" Look Into It - Home








The leaders of the past beckon us to get involved, and encroaching despotism before us demands it! Get Busy -> Look Into It


The main purpose of this site is to stock information, materials, and resources in defending against political/geopolitical corruption and its vast power, which is drastically changing your life and the lives of everyone you know (for the worse).  Example: Are you familiar with TPP?...The Enemy Belligerent Act?...NDAA?  The Govt Assassinating American Citizens?  The violations of Posse Comitatus, and Patriot Act?  What about Codex Alimentarius?  The WTO?...or the IMF World Bank?  The Federal Reserve?  Cashless Trackable Society?  Eugenics?  Transhumanism?  Organ Harvesting?  If you've never heard about this stuff, or know very little, then you need to bookmark this site now and start to look into these issues...for they are affecting you severely.  


  • solutions 
  • they want you dead! 
  • u.s. government assassinating american citizens! 
  • planned parenthood murders babies and sells their body parts!! 
  • pawns on the grand chessboard 
  • the swiss army knife of destabilization : isis exposed 
  • give a man a bank and he can rob the world 
  • americans can legally be kidnapped and held without trial!! 
  • gun confiscation has begun : gun owner alert! 
  • it's the oldest trick in the book dating back to roman times : creating the enemies you need 
  • the intelligence community, military and police, merge for total population control 
solutions1 they want you dead!2 u.s. government assassinating american citizens!3 planned parenthood murders babies and sells their body parts!!4 pawns on the grand chessboard5 the swiss army knife of destabilization : isis exposed6 give a man a bank and he can rob the world7 americans can legally be kidnapped and held without trial!!8 gun confiscation has begun : gun owner alert!9 it's the oldest trick in the book dating back to roman times : creating the enemies you need10 the intelligence community, military and police, merge for total population control11 
wordpress slider by WOWSlider.com v8.2




MLKBut first, imagine it is 1963 and you walk outside to see your neighbor, Martin, leaving hastily on his way to do something. The speed of his leaving makes even the man across the street curious enough to ask.
"Martin, where are you running off to again?"
Dr. King turns to the man as his key unlocks the car door, and says, "Friend, look around you, can't you see the work that needs to be done?...and if so, how about coming along with me?"
"Ah, there you go again Martin," replies the man, "you worry too much about politics and the like.  Things are going to workout...I mean, don't you watch television?...they say it all the time.  Anyway, you are too radical for me...reading, truth searching, voting...let somebody else do all that work for rights and freedoms.  Besides, doesn't your Bible teach that we are in the "end times," and things are like this because it's the way it's suppose to be?...You know, prophecy and all that."  
Suddenly the phone rings indoors, for the man who had been speaking, and he announces. "Oh well, excuse me Rev, some of us have a life...later my brothers." And he trots off as Dr. King happens to look your way. "Excuse me friend, I notice you standing there...no doubt you heard the conversation?  Listen," he opens the car door, "I am on my way to talk to a few folks gathered at the Lincoln Memorial...would you like to join us?"  Click here to be inspired, and to see how things turned out. 


What would your response have been to M.L.K Jr? What if Dr. King listened to types like the man across the street? Has some convenient distraction, carried you away from getting involved in the fate of your society? For the clarion call continues today, arguably in a time where the situation is much worse than it was even then. If you are not convinced that it is, I would strongly suggest that you do your best efforts to, "Look Into It."


A special welcome if you've come by this site via Fighting Worldwide Genocide or Kings and Government on YouTube!





"Biblical And Natural Law Principles Regarding War"



This message was preached by Pastor Chuck Baldwin on Sunday, August 13, 2017 during the service at Liberty Fellowship. To purchase a copy of this message or to support the fellowship please visit LibertyFellowshipMT.com

"Donald Trump does NOT have authority from God to do anything he wants regarding assassination and war. Not only does Trump not have authority from God to fight premature, foolish, and unjust wars, he doesn’t have authority from the Supreme Law of the United States to fight such wars: the Constitution of the United States.

Our President is not a king; he is not an emperor; he is not a monarch. Only the people’s representatives in Congress can lawfully declare war. Any war fought outside the jurisdictional authority of the U.S. Constitution is an illegal war. Tragically, America has not fought a constitutional war since World War II. And our spineless congressmen (from both parties) have allowed presidents--left and right--to get away with it." An Excerpt From The Must-Read Article :

Pastor Robert Jeffress And The Prophets Of Ahab






"The Art of WAR"

Portraits of Racketeering & Terrorism by The U.S. Empire and Its Allies


A Pact with the Devil

  We Fight


Decline of Empires

American Empire D.D.D.

How SA Funded Global Terror

Uncovering Saudi Arabia 

Greater Israel -Zionism

The War You Don't See

John Pilger: Palestine Is Still The Issue
- Real Stories -

America, Israel's Whore

Abby Martin "Exposes" Zionism & Israel

* All 12 videos are essential, please watch and share!



-- Dwight David Eisenhower --

"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. This is, I repeat, the best way of life to be found on the road the world has been taking. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron. […] Is there no other way the world may live?"

"Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground?"

Why does the US have 800 military bases around the world?


David Vine: American Bases Around The World


Striking Example of How The US Is Enslaved To The Military Industrial Complex


The US has about 800 military bases in other countries, according to David Vine in his forthcoming book Base Nation. And it costs a lot of money to keep them open. Why are they there in the first place?


Chalmers Johnson : The Sorrows of Empire

Published on Nov 22, 2010

Interview with Chalmers Johnson author of "The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic" given February 12, 2004 in Seattle.


David Vine is the author of the landmark book, Base Nation, on US military bases around the world. This is an eye-opening, factual account based on years of research. David explains how these bases do not serve America's security or best interests, rather they anger and cause many in these occupied countries to rise up and demand that America go home. He also points out how the costs to maintain these bases along with hundreds of thousands of US troops and their families is causing our needs at home to be neglected.



Close All US Military Bases on Foreign Soil

US Empire Reaches Breaking Point – Time To End It

Trump says the F-35 is too expensive and he's not wrong. But this is what he's up against.


The Bases Are Loaded: US Permanent Military Presence in Iraq

Published on Jun 20, 2007

Will the U.S. ever leave Iraq? Official policy promises an eventual departure, while warning of the dire consequences of a "premature" withdrawal. But while Washington equivocates, facts on the ground tell another story. Independent journalist Dahr Jamail, and author Chalmers Johnson, are discovering that military bases in Iraq are being consolidated from over a hundred to a handful of "megabases" with lavish amenities. Much of what is taking place is obscured by denials and quibbles over the definition of "permanent." The Bases Are Loaded covers a wide range of topics. Gary Hart, James Goldsborough, Nadia Keilani, Raed Jarrar, Bruce Finley Kam Zarrabi and Mark Rudd all add their observations about the extent and purpose of the bases in Iraq.


The Troops Don't Defend Our Freedoms


by Jacob G. Hornberger
by Jacob G. Hornberger

How often do we hear the claim that American troops “defend our freedoms”? The claim is made often by U.S. officials and is echoed far and wide across the land by television commentators, newspaper columnists, public-school teachers, and many others. It's even a common assertion that emanates on Sundays from many church pulpits.

Unfortunately, it just isn't so. In fact, the situation is the exact opposite — the troops serve as the primary instrument by which both our freedoms and well-being are threatened.

Let's examine the three potential threats to our freedoms and the role that the troops play in them:

1. Foreign regimes

Every competent military analyst would tell us that the threat of a foreign invasion and conquest of America is nonexistent. No nation has the military capability of invading and conquering the United States. Not China, not Russia, not Iran, not North Korea, not Syria. Not anyone. To invade the United States with sufficient forces to conquer and “pacify” the entire nation would take millions of foreign troops and tens of thousands of ships and planes to transport them across the Atlantic or Pacific ocean. No foreign nation has such resources or military capabilities and no nation will have them for the foreseeable future.

After all, think about it: the U.S. army, the most powerful military force in all of history, has not been able to fully conquer such a small country as Iraq because of the level of domestic resistance to a foreign invasion. Imagine the level of military forces that would be needed to conquer and “pacify” a country as large and well-armed as the United States.

I repeat: No foreign nation has the military capability to invade the United States, conquer our country, subjugate our people, and take away our freedoms. Therefore, the troops are not needed to protect our freedoms from this nonexistent threat.

2. Terrorists

Despite widespread fears to the contrary, there is no possibility that terrorists will conquer the United States, take over the government, and take away our freedoms. At most, they are able to kill thousands of people, with, say, suicide bombs but they lack the military forces to subjugate the entire nation or any part of it.

Equally important, while the troops claim that they are protecting us from “the terrorists,” it is the troops themselves — or, more precisely, the presidential orders they have loyally carried out — that have engendered the very terrorist threats against which the troops say they are now needed to protect us.

Think back to 1989 and the years following — when the Berlin Wall fell, East and West Germany were united, Soviet troops withdrew from Eastern Europe, and the Soviet Union was dismantled. The Pentagon didn't know what to do. Unexpectedly, its 50-year-old “official enemy” was gone. (The Soviet Union had previously been America's “ally” that had “liberated” Eastern Europe from Nazi Germany.) With the fall of the Soviet empire (and, actually, before the fall), the obvious question arose: Why should the United States continue to have an enormous standing army and spend billions of dollars in taxpayer money to keep it in existence?

The Pentagon was in desperate search for a new mission. “We can be a big help in the war on drugs,” the Pentagon said. To prove it, U.S. military forces even shot to death 18-year-old American citizen Esequiel Hernandez in 1997, as he tended his goats along the U.S.-Mexican border. “We'll help American businesses compete in the world.” “We'll readjust NATO's mission to protect Europe from non-Soviet threats.” “We'll protect us from an unsafe world.”

Then along came the Pentagon's old ally, Saddam Hussein, to whom the United States had even entrusted weapons of mass destruction to use against the Iranian people, and gave America's standing army a new raison d'être. Invading Kuwait over an oil-drilling dispute, Saddam provided the Pentagon with a new official enemy, one that would last for more than 10 continuous years.

Obeying presidential orders to attack Iraq in 1991, without the constitutionally required congressional declaration of war, the troops ended up killing tens of thousands of Iraqis. Obeying Pentagon orders to attack Iraq's water and sewage facilities, the troops accomplished exactly what Pentagon planners had anticipated — spreading deadly infections and disease among the Iraqi people. Continuing to obey presidential orders in the years that followed, the troops enforced what was possibly the most brutal embargo in history, which ended up contributing to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children, deaths that U.S. officials said were “worth it.” Obeying presidential orders, the troops enforced the illegal “no-fly zones” over Iraq, which killed even more Iraqis, including children. Obeying presidential orders, the troops established themselves on Islamic holy lands with full knowledge of the anger and resentment that that would produce among devout Muslims. Obeying presidential orders, the troops invaded and occupied Iraq without the constitutionally required congressional declaration of war, killing and maiming tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis — that is, people whose worst “crime” was to resist the unlawful invasion of their homeland by a foreign power.

All that death and destruction — both pre-9/11 and post-9/11 — have given rise to terrible anger and hatred against the United States, which inspired the pre-9/11 attacks, such as the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center, the attack on the USS Cole, and the attacks on overseas U.S. embassies, the 9/11 attacks, and the terrorist threats our nation faces today.

Through it all, the Pentagon simply echoed the claims of the president — that all the death and destruction and humiliation that the U.S. government had wreaked on people in the Middle East, as well as its unconditional military and financial foreign aid to the Israeli government, had not engendered any adverse feelings in the Middle East against the United States. Instead, the president and the Pentagon claimed, the problem was that the terrorists simply hated America for its “freedom and values.”

If the American people had dismantled the nation's standing army when the Soviet empire was dismantled, the federal government would have lacked the military means to meddle and intervene in the Middle East with unconstitutional military operations, sanctions, no-fly zones, bases, invasions, and occupations. Therefore, there never would have been the terrorists attacks against the United States and a “war on terrorism” for the troops to fight, not to mention the USA PATRIOT Act, secret search warrants and secret courts, the Padilla doctrine, and other federal infringements on our rights and freedoms.

Finally, but certainly important, despite being the most powerful standing army in the world, the U.S. troops were not even able to protect Americans from terrorist acts, as best evidenced by two terrorist attacks on the same target — the World Trade Center, first in 1993 and then again in 2001.


War on Terror: Greatest Covert Op



Mad Dogs Of War

Brother Nathanael
Published on Jan 30, 2018



US War Costs 3 Times Higher Than Pentagon Estimates - Report

RT Published on Nov 13, 2017

It's been calculated that - by the end of this year - the US will have spent a total of 5-point-6-trillion dollars on wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria. That's triple what the Pentagon says it's spent.


"...If the American people knew about this they'd say, 'enough of this militarism!'"

-- Ron Paul --

The Real Cost Of War:
Three Times More Than The Government Admits

Streamed live 5 hours ago

According to a new study by Brown University's Watson Institute, the real cost of the US wars since 9/11 is three times the Pentagon's estimate. Some $5.6 trillion have been spent on the endless global war. The total costs of 16 years of war are even higher, and they extend beyond just finance.


would like to think that we could win the moral argument against the global military empire, but we have to be realistic.  And I think the Watson Institute does a great service, by simply breaking it down into financial terms.”

"Americans need to understand that their pockets are being picked by very wealthy connected people, and it’s not benefiting them. So I think that if middle America can understand the real costs to their future, their children’s future, their financial future of this military empire, I think we might have a chance of really winning that argument. 

-- Daniel McAdams --



(Article Continued: The Troops Don't Defend Our Freedoms)

3. The federal government

As our Founding Fathers understood so well, the primary threat to our freedom lies with our own government. That's in fact why we have the Constitution and the Bill of Rights — to protect us and our freedoms from federal officials. If the federal government did not constitute such an enormous threat to our freedoms, there would be no reason to have the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Yet, what is the primary means by which a government takes away the freedoms of its citizenry? Our American ancestors gave us the answer: its military forces. That is in fact why many of our Founding Fathers opposed a standing, professional military force in America — they knew not only that such a force would be used to involve the nation in costly, senseless, and destructive wars abroad but also that government officials would inevitably use the troops to ensure a compliant and obedient citizenry at home.

Consider the words of James Madison:

A standing military force, with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defense against foreign danger have been always the instruments of tyranny at home. Among the Romans it was a standing maxim to excite a war, whenever a revolt was apprehended. Throughout all Europe, the armies kept up under the pretext of defending, have enslaved the people. 

Here's how Patrick Henry put it:

A standing army we shall have, also, to execute the execrable commands of tyranny; and how are you to punish them? Will you order them to be punished? Who shall obey these orders? Will your mace-bearer be a match for a disciplined regiment? 

Would U.S. troops obey presidential orders to deploy against the American people and take away our freedoms?

There is no doubt about it. Of course they would, especially if the president told them that our “freedom and national security” depended on it, which he would.

As I suggested in my article, “The Troops Don't Support the Constitution,” in the United States the loyalty of the troops is to the president as their supreme commander of chief, not to the Constitution. Recent evidence of this point, as I observed in my article, was the willingness of the troops to obey presidential orders to deploy to Iraq despite the fact that the president had failed to secure the constitutionally required congressional declaration of war.

What if the president ordered the troops to deploy across the United States and to round up “terrorists” and incarcerate them in military camps, both here and in Cuba? Again, there can be no doubt that most of the troops would willingly obey the president's orders, especially in the middle of a “crisis” or “emergency” because they view themselves as professional soldiers whose job is to serve the president and not to question why but simply to do or die.

Another good example of the allegiance that the troops have toward the president involves the case of U.S. citizen Jose Padilla. Labeling Padilla a “terrorist,” the president ordered the troops to take him into military custody, deny him access to an attorney, and punish him without a trial and due process of law. The troops obeyed without question. Do you know any troops who have publicly protested the Padilla incarceration or who have resigned from the army in protest? How many have publicly announced, “I refuse to participate in the Padilla incarceration because I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution”?

Indeed, how many of the troops resigned in protest at the president's orders to set up a prisoner camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, knowing that the reason he and the Pentagon chose Cuba, rather than the United States, was precisely to avoid the constraints of the Constitution?

If the troops didn't protest with respect to Iraq or Padilla or Gitmo, what is the likelihood they would protest when their commander in chief ordered them to arrest 100 other Americans “terrorists,” or 1,000?

I repeat: The troops, from the Pentagon on down, would not disobey orders of the president to disarm and arrest American “terrorists,” especially in the midst of a “crisis” or “emergency.”

And even if some were to protest, they would be quickly shunted aside (probably punished as well) and replaced with those troops whose allegiance and loyalty to the president would be unquestioned.

Now it's true that soldiers are supposed to disobey unlawful orders, but as a practical matter most of the troops are not going to overrule the judgment of their commander in chief as to what is legal or not. After all, how many troops involved in the torture and sex-abuse scandal refused to participate in the wrongdoing, especially since they thought that it was approved by the higher-ups? Again, how many refused orders to deploy to Iraq despite the fact that there was no constitutionally required congressional declaration of war?

Imagine that the president issues the following grave announcement on national television during prime time: “Our nation has come under another terrorist attack. Our freedoms and our national security are at stake. I have issued orders to the Joint Chiefs of Staff to immediately take into custody some 1,000 American terrorists who have been identified by the FBI as having conspired to commit this dastardly attack or who have given aid and comfort to the enemy. I have also ordered the JCS to take all necessary steps to temporarily confiscate weapons in the areas where these terrorists are believed to be hiding. These weapons will be returned to the owners once the terrorist threat has subsided. I am calling on all Americans to support the troops in these endeavors, just as you are supporting them in their fight against terrorism in Iraq. We will survive. We will prevail. God bless America.”

Now ask yourself: How many of the troops would disobey the orders of the president given those circumstances, especially if panicked and terrified Americans and the mainstream press were endorsing his martial-law orders?

The answer: Almost none would disobey. They would not consider it their job to determine the constitutionality of the president's orders. They would leave that for the courts to decide. Their professional allegiance and loyalty to their supreme commander in chief would trump all other considerations, including their oath to “support and defend the Constitution.”

Therefore, if the federal government is the primary threat to our freedom, then so are the troops: their unswerving loyalty to their commander in chief makes them the primary instrument by which the federal government is able to destroy or infringe the rights and freedoms of the citizenry.

The solution

No one can deny that we now live in a nation in which the president wields, albeit unconstitutionally, the omnipotent power to send the entire nation into war against another nation — and that he has the means — a loyal and obedient army — to exercise that power. President Bush made his position clear prior to his invasion of Iraq, when he emphasized that while he welcomed the support of Congress in the event he decided to wage war on Iraq, he didn't need its approval. His position was reconfirmed by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who informed Congress on October 19, 2005, that the commander in chief's position was that he did not need the consent of Congress to send the nation into another war, this time against Syria.

No one can deny that we now live in a nation in which the president claims the omnipotent power to jail and punish any American citizen whom the president labels a “terrorist,” denying him due process of law, trial by jury, and other constitutional guarantees — and that he has the means — a loyal and obedient army — to exercise that power.

Thus, as a practical matter the troops serve not as a defender of our freedoms but instead simply as a loyal and obedient personal army of the president, ready and prepared to serve him and obey his commands. It is an army that stands ready to obey the president's orders to deploy to any country in the world for any reason he deems fit and attack, kill, and maim any “terrorist” who dares to resist the U.S. invasion of his own country. It is also an army that stands ready to obey the president's orders to take into custody any American whom the commander in chief deems a “terrorist” and to punish him accordingly.

There is one — and only one — solution to this threat to our freedoms and well-being: for the American people to heed the warning of our Founding Fathers against standing armies before it is too late, and to do what should have been done at least 15 years ago: dismantle the U.S. military empire, close all overseas bases, and bring all the troops home, discharging them into the private sector, where they would effectively become “citizen-soldiers” — well-trained citizens prepared to rally to the defense of our nation in the unlikely event of a foreign invasion of our country. And for the American people to heed the warning of President Eisenhower against the military-industrial complex, by shutting down the Pentagon's enormous domestic military empire, closing domestic bases, and discharging those troops into the private sector.

“Oh, my gosh, if we did all that, how would our freedoms be protected?”

Protected from what? Again, there is no threat of a foreign invasion. And again, terrorism is not a threat to our freedom. Moreover, dismantling the standing army would remove the primary means by which presidents have succeeded in engendering so much anger and hatred against our nation — anger and hatred that in turn have given rise to the threat of terrorism against our nation. And finally, the worst threat to our freedom is our own government, and by dismantling the standing army we would reduce that threat significantly.

What would happen if a foreign nation ever began constructing thousands of ships and planes and mobilizing millions of people to invade the United States? The answer to that threat was also provided by our Founding Fathers: the foreign nation in question would be met by a nation of free well-armed citizens who would be prepared and willing to rally quickly to oppose any invasion and conquest of our nation. Invading a United States filled with well-trained, free men and women would be much like invading Switzerland — like swallowing a porcupine. Don't forget that the men and women who currently serve in the U.S. armed services wouldn't disappear; instead they would join the rest of us as citizen-soldiers, people whose fighting skills could be depended on in the unlikely event our nation were ever threatened by invasion by a foreign power.

We should also keep in mind the tremendous economic prosperity that would result from the dismantling of America's enormous standing army. Not only would all the taxpayer money that is being used to fund the standing army be left in the hands of the citizenry for savings and capital, but all those new people in the private sector would be producing as well, instead of living off the IRS-provided fruits of other people's earnings. Thus, the economic effect would be doubly positive, and, while weakening the federal government, it would make our nation stronger.

What about foreign monsters, tyrants, oppressors, and conquerors? The answer to that was also provided by our Founding Fathers: Our government would no longer go abroad in search of monsters to destroy, but foreigners suffering oppression and tyranny would know that there would always be at least one nation that would accept them — the United States of America. Rather than police the world, Americans would focus on producing the freest and most prosperous society in history as a model for the world and to which those who escaped tyranny and oppression could freely come.

Of course, those Americans who would nonetheless wish to leave their families and jobs to help oppressed people overseas would still be free to do so.

We should also bear in mind the perverse results of the federal government's military empire and overseas interventions. World War I brought World War II, which brought the Soviet communist occupation of Eastern Europe, which brought the Cold War, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War, along with an enormous standing army in our country. The Middle East interventions and meddling have brought us terrorism, the war on terrorism, the USA PATRIOT Act, the Padilla doctrine, military torture and sex abuse, and CIA kidnappings and “renditions” to foreign countries for the purpose of proxy torture.

By their fruits, you shall know them.

One vision — the vision of militarism and empire — will bring America more violence, death, destruction, impoverishment, and loss of freedom. The other vision — the vision of a limited-government, constitutional republic with citizen-soldiers — would put our nation back on the right road of peace, prosperity, harmony, and freedom.


Black Budget: US govt clueless about missing Pentagon $trillions

Published on Dec 21, 2013

The Pentagon has secured a 630 billion dollar budget for next year, even though it's failed to even account for the money it's received since 1996. A whopping 8.5 trillion dollars of taxpayer cash have gone to defence programmes - none of which has been audited. This black budget has sparked concerns over potential fraud, as Gayane Chichakyan reports.

"...A whopping 8.5 trillion dollars of taxpayer cash have gone to defence programmes - none of which has been audited. This black budget has sparked concerns over potential fraud."


Trump Serves The War Gods

Brother Nathanael
Published on Dec 12, 2017





Big Military Spending Boost Threatens Our Economy and Security

by Ron Paul

(Excerpt From The Article)

...Unfortunately President Trump seems to be incapable of understanding that it is US intervention and occupation of foreign countries that creates instability and feeds terrorism. Continuing to do the same thing for more than 17 years – more US bombs to “stabilize” the Middle East – and expecting different results is hardly a sensible foreign policy. It is insanity. Until he realizes that our military empire is the source of rather than the solution to our problems, we will continue to wildly spend on our military empire until the dollar collapses and we are brought to our knees. Then what?


The Information-Industrial Complex

Published on Dec 18, 2017
TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=25128

Half a century ago, outgoing President Dwight D. Eisenhower coined the term "military-industrial complex" to describe the fascistic collusion between the Pentagon and America's burgeoning armaments industry. But in our day and age we are witnessing the rise of a new collusion, one between the Pentagon and the tech industry that it helped to seed, that is committed to waging a covert war against people the world over. Now, in the 21st century, it is time to give this new threat a name: the information-industrial complex.


Transhumanism And The Technocratic Era


 RAND Corporation




Excerpts from the Must Watch Video Below Titled : 

As US Fuels WAR CRIMES in Yemen, House Says US Involvement is Unauthorized

The Real News: Nov 17, 2017

MARK WEISBROT: "...they really don't want a full and open debate. They don't want this to become a real political and possibly electoral issue, I mean a big issue. That's what they're afraid of because it's completely indefensible. That's very important I think. The details are kind of important for people to know because there's a real chance of stopping this terrible war, the worst humanitarian crisis in the world."

MARK WEISBROT: ..."If people contact their members of Congress and especially their senators now, the members of Congress can also and are going to be trying to persuade the senators, so both of them. I think that could really be the beginning of the end of this war. It's really urgent, you know, because as you mentioned the humanitarian groups, the UN are saying that really millions of people are at risk and people are dying there every day."

SHARMINI PERIES: ..."If it is what you say, which is partly to prop up Saudi Arabia in the region as the region of power as opposed to Iran, does the administration have the right to go about doing that at the cost of this kind of humanitarian disaster?

MARK WEISBROT: "Of course, there's no right to do any of this stuff. These are, as the New York Times said, these are actual war crimes. They are literally starving the whole population to force the people that they're opposing to give in. Of course, it's illegal under international law, but it's horrific. As I said, it's the worst humanitarian crisis in the world, and this is one of the ways we can stop it. Unfortunately, it hasn't gotten the attention that it deserves in the U.S., in the media overall internationally, but it's getting a lot more."

Full Transcript Here :




Thousands of Yemenis Protest U.S. - Saudi's Bombs

!!! Humanitarian Crisis In Yemen Is Worst In The World !!!

– Oxfam report -

As of March 27, 2017 According to RT Report :

  • At least 10,000 people killed from coalition air strikes  
  • More than 100 civilians killed in 1 month according to the U.N.  
  • More than 3MILLION Yemenis have been displaced from their homes  
  • Oxfam describes the humanitarian situation as the worst on the planet  
  • An estimated 17MILLION People lack access to food  
  • 7MILLION are 1 step away from starvation 

Published on Mar 27, 2017
Thousands of protesters in Yemen have vented their anger at the relentless bombing by the Saudi-led coalition, as the conflict in their country rages on. The demonstration coincided with the 2nd anniversary of the Saudi intervention...
RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air 



Selected Articles: US War Crimes

By Global Research News
Global Research, November 19, 2017

In an era of media distortion, our emphasis has been on the “unspoken truth”. As an independent site, it is our mandate to challenge the engineered truth by the corporate media. The selected articles below reveal media omission pertaining to US war crimes across the globe.

President Trump Accelerates Drone Strikes in Somalia

By Zero Hedge, November 19, 2017

U.S. Africa Command has conducted fourteen airstrikes since August bringing the year’s total to eighteen. The increased tempo of airstrikes started in September between the Kismayo and Mogadisu region.

Secretary Mattis Is Off Base: US Military Presence in Syria Has No Legal Grounds

By Peter Korzun, November 19, 2017

Although the US has many times stated that its target is IS only, it appears that its intentions may go beyond the stated objective. In fact, Washington is seeking to retain post-conflict zones of influence within the country, where the American presence is illegal.

The US-led War Against ISIS Is Killing 31 Times More Civilians Than Claimed. Report

By Alex Ward, November 19, 2017

It turns out that the military’s assertion is a stunning underestimation of the true human cost of Washington’s three-year-old war against ISIS. An 18-month-long investigation by the New York Times has found that the US-led military coalition is killing civilians in Iraq at a rate 31 times higher than it’s admitting.

America’s Renegade Warfare. Is the U.S. Guilty of Genocide

By Nicolas J. S. Davies, November 18, 2017

Claiming the right to launch preemptive wars and fighting an ill-defined “global war on terror,” the U.S. government has slaughtered vast numbers of civilians in defiance of international law, says Nicolas J S Davies.

Trump and the Nuclear Option: The Fiction of Sanity

By Dr. Binoy Kampmark, November 18, 2017

It had not happened in decades. On Tuesday, members of the US Congress gathered to consider the scope of presidential power in launching a nuclear strike. The state of the mind of the current president was very much at the forefront of the discussion, even if some present preferred not to name him specifically.

Who is Behind “Fake News”? Mainstream Media Use Fake Videos and Images

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, November 18, 2017

These are four examples and there are many more. The manipulation of videos and images is routine. In some cases, these manipulations are revealed by readers, independent media and social media. In most cases they go undetected. And when they are revealed, the media will say “sorry” we apologize: they will then point to technical errors. “we got the wrong video”.

Please go and Donate to GR. Page Link :



Save the Children:
130 Yemeni children die each day due to Saudi blockade





Infowars Turns a Blind Eye to the Impending Deaths of 50,000 Children in Yemen!

The disparity between Infowars taking to task prior and current presidential administrations is contemptible.

November 21, 2017

Though the mounting war crimes of the present administration are abundant (as seen by the Global Research links above) Infowars (namely Alex Jones) continues to report the misdeeds of Donald Trump in a positive light, or omits them all together if they can not be spun that way. Such is the case in Yemen with its unprecedented humanitarian crisis. (For background watch the video below: ‘Untold 1000s of innocent victims will die’: UN urges end of Yemen blockade)

If you've waited like I have, in the hopes that Alex Jones at some point would show impartiality in his journalism toward Trump, despite helping him get in office, I think the lack of coverage on Yemen - its circumstances being so dire and severe - to me regrettably makes it safe to say that that's not going to happen. Alex would have you believe that Trump is some maverick outside of the controlled left right paradigm, but his actions clearly prove otherwise: the impending deaths of 50,000 children because of his approved US military involvement is just one egregious example! And the overwhelming magnitude of PR Alex uses day by day to keep this facade going, I believe would have even embarrassed Edward Bernays.

Below are just three examples out of many that you can find on this site of Infowars holding Obama and his administration accountable of its unconstitutional military actions. In contrast, there are no video special reports from Infowars to post about Trump, though he’s continued and even exacerbated these same illegal actions! This in itself shows the disparity and bias of their current reporting, and marked the beginning of the end of me seeing Infowars as a trustworthy impartial news source.

This is why I feel morally obligated, especially in light of the Yemeni genocide, to dissuade people from listening to Jones unless you want to experience geopolitical news tainted by obfuscations, omissions, and distractions...he's recently made 25+ youtube videos on the NFL for crying out loud. The irony is, that the Alex Jones/Infowars videos I've chosen to remain on this site, are largely a repudiation to what Alex is now.

In short, I am compelled to believe that Alex Jones' reporting omission of what most would agree as the greatest humanitarian crisis on the planet, clearly displays a stark change from him being an independent news journalist who cares about justice for all, into being a venal propagandist for persons that view the publicizing of their war crimes, counter productive to their geostrategic aims in the region. For more background as to why I say this, please watch the 12 videos at the top of this page. Once you have done that perhaps you'll have a similar view.

Look for more on this subject to be posted later. But for now I hope that all who actually care about the men, women and children in Yemen who are caught in this nefarious war, will put pressure on our government by calling to account the politicians and the news journalists who make it possible, and to use whatever viable way you can to inform others about these horrific and tragic circumstances.

"We journalists... have to be brave enough to defy those who seek our collusion in selling their latest bloody adventure in someone else's country... That means always challenging the official story, however patriotic that story may appear, however seductive and insidious it is. For propaganda relies on us in the media to aim its deceptions not at a far away country but at you at home... In this age of endless imperial war, the lives of countless men, women and children depend on the truth or their blood is on us... Those whose job it is to keep the record straight ought to be the voice of people, not power." -- John Pilger



Beheadings Up! Human Rights Down

The Alex Jones Channel
Published on Sep 29, 2015

2015 has been a banner year for be-headings in Saudi Arabia. According to Amnesty International be-headings have surpassed 175 at a rate of one every two days. Many had hoped That new Saudi King Salman would have diminished the brutality, instead he has accelerated it.

Well then, America and the rest of the representatives of the modern world must be furious with the Saudi Government for these blatant displays of medieval barbarism. Wrong.

Saudi Arabia has been chosen to head an important U.N. human rights panel. And State Department Deputy Spokesman Mark Toner responded with enthusiasm. Toner said “We would welcome it. We’re close allies…”

Close allies, according to witness testimony to the classified 28 pages of the 9/11 report, this ally of ours funded the 9/11 terror attacks and has been dubbed the Great ISIS by Colonel Sharaf Luqman, the official spokesman for the Yemeni armed forces. A region that has experienced exponential war crimes undertaken by Saudi Arabia and supported by the United States.

The Saudi government has been very elusive with the evidence connecting them to the bankrolling of ISIS. It has officially condemned the Islamic State along with Jabhat al-Nusra, the Muslim Brotherhood, Yemen’s Houthi rebels, and Saudi Hezbollah.

Wealthy Saudi and Qatari citizens, however, continue to fund and support Sunni Wahhabist groups in the Middle East, including ISIS, al-Nusra, Liwa al-Tawhid, Ahrar al-Sham, Jaish al-Islam and other jihadi fighters in Syria.
Yet, none of these wealthy agitators have been beheaded.


Obama Orders Children Murdered

Dec 19, 2012

As Obama grandstands and uses the Sandy Hook crisis to, in the words of Eric Holder "brainwash the public" that guns are bad and the cause of violent crime and misery, We decided to show just a few of the documented cases of drone attacks that he personally ordered where children were killed. Drone attack after drone attack you will see the real face of the Globalists. This man does not care about children he cares about disarming the American people to bring in a totalitarian government.

The Obama Deception was released In Less Than Two Months after Obama was inaugurated

“In the real executive power structure, the president serves the military industrial complex, itself owned by the international bankers...” 

-- Alex Jones, The Obama Deception --


Saudi Genocide Campaign

The Alex Jones Channel
Published on Apr 25, 2015

The Saudi’s claimed to be done with their airstrike campaign on the Houthi Rebels. But it appears that was a dirty Saudi trick, coaxing the residents of Yemen out of their homes to be pummeled by more Saudi Airstrikes. The Strikes have so far wounded 3,311 and killed 951 people, 300 Civilians…134 of them were children. The Saudi Arabian elitist genocide campaign may seem like a world away. But according to the truth about the Saudi Government and their involvement hidden in plain view in the full 9/11 commission report. That same psychopathic irresponsibility could potentially spark into a full blown third world war in the Middle East.









SAUDI ARABIA IS A BIGGER THREAT THAN IRAN - www.infowars.com/saudi-arabia-...


SAUDI ARABIA, WITH US SUPPORT, INVADES YEMEN - www.infowars.com/saudi-arabia-...





This man does not care about [Yemeni] children

  • 2017 Alex Jones Soldout and Becomes Trump's PR Toady...Now with Blood on His Hands.

  • The Same Genocide, Illegal Wars, Drone Murders, and Saudi/Israeli Control Over our Government Goes on Unabated...Those are real reasons to oppose Trump, not the fake opposition garbage.
  • Trump is No Maverick, but just another "Quigley Formula" Puppet with Alt media cover for this Election Selection
  • Be sure to scroll down this page to the section: ...And Beware of ALT-Media 


-- Alex Jones 2012, quote below from his video : Obama Orders Children Murdered --


ecause of the context we are putting it in his[Obama's]
 hypocrisy, the censors will try to block you seeing something that ended the Vietnam war, and could end all of these undeclared illegal wars We’re trying to save children here, not just the children killed at Sandy Hook, the twenty, but  the thousands killed by these illegal wars.”

"This support to the Saudi-UAE effort to wage this war in Yemen, though, is not legitimate. It's illegal. It was started by the Obama administration and continued and emphasized by the Trump administration. It's illegal. It's brutal. "

-- Col. Larry Wilkerson --


"This horror, and I’m sorry it’s hard to see, is caused in part by our decision to facilitate a bombing campaign that is Murdering Children!

-- Senator Chris Murphy --

‘Untold 1000s of innocent victims will die’: UN urges end of Yemen blockade

Published on Nov 17, 2017

The heads of three UN agencies issued a fresh plea for the Saudi-led military coalition to lift its blockade on Yemen.


Senator Murphy Demands Congressional Action On Saudi Arabia’s Blockade In Yemen

Senator Chris Murphy
Published on Nov 14, 2017

“What they are doing is a gross violation of human rights law. And it would be one thing if the United States was a mere observer, but we are a participant in this. This horror, and I’m sorry it’s hard to see, is caused in part by our decision to facilitate a bombing campaign that is murdering children!”

"This is a stain on the conscience of our nation if we continue to be silent."

"I hope that we make clear that there is NO legal authorization for the Unted States to be part of a war inside Yemen. Congress has NOT given the authorization for this president to engage in these military activities."

-- Senator Chris Murphy --

As US Fuels War Crimes in Yemen, House Says US Involvement is Unauthorized

Published on Nov 17, 2017

Overwhelming support for the nonbinding resolution, which passed the House 366-30, shows opposition to Saudi Arabia's war in Yemen is growing, but more pressure is needed to stop U.S. involvement, explains economist Mark Weisbrot of CEPR

YEMEN: The ‘New Vietnam’ Could Bring an End to the US ‘Forever War’ Policy

November 9, 2017 By 21wire

Connor Freeman
Libertarian Institute

House Concurrent Resolution 81 (H.Con.Res.81) is sponsored by Representatives, Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), Walter Jones (R-NC), Mark Pocan (D-Wisc.), Thomas Massie (R-KY), and 39 other lawmakers. The resolution commands an end to U.S. participation in the Saudi-led war in Yemen.

The sponsors of this resolution contend that such participation, which began in March 2015, was never authorized under the War Powers Act of 1973. Per the War Powers Act, any congressman can pose a legal challenge and is guaranteed a floor vote on the issue. This is known as a privileged resolution.

On November 1st, the night before the vote was scheduled to take place, House leadership swiftly pushed through a Rules Committee vote, denying the resolution’s privileged status. Thus, preventing the guaranteed floor vote.

What was their justification? Apparently, the House Rules Committee feels that the war in Yemen has yet to ‘rise to a level’ where the War Powers Act is applicable.

After preventing the vote on H.Con.Res.81, the House Leadership has said it shall permit a ‘compromise’ resolution on the war in Yemen. The debate, scheduled for the week of November 13th, will discuss the legality of U.S. involvement in the war. The vote will be non-binding.

Five peace activist groups, heavily engaged in promoting the resolution, said just after the Rules Committee vote:

“We remind the House leadership that under the War Powers Resolution of 1973,

“‘introduction of United States Armed Forces ’includes the assignment of member of such armed forces to command, coordinate, participate in the movement of, or accompany the regular or irregular military forces of any foreign country or government when such military forces are engaged…’

U.S. refueling of Saudi-UAE planes bombing Houthi targets in Yemen meets that definition.’”

Therefore the War Powers Act, clearly applies to the war on Yemen.

The House leadership is lying to the American people, supporting the continuation of the world’s worst humanitarian crisis, violating the War Powers Act, and attempting to prevent Congress from stopping yet another illegal and unconstitutional war.

Conservatively, since the beginning of 2017, at least 10,000 people have been killed in this war. The heroic and indispensable Yemeni journalist Nasser Arrabyee has said the toll could be as high as 60,000 deaths.

The Saudis are ruthlessly bombarding the Yemenis and their civilian infrastructure. The coalition wants to cripple the people of Yemen to the point of submission. Their end goal is to force Yemen’s civilians to stop supporting the northern tribesmen if only to alleviate their suffering.

U.S. involvement is most critical to the Saudi effort in this war. The U.S. military is training Saudi Arabian forces. The U.S. is refueling the coalition’s warplanes not just in the air with tanker sorties, but also on its bases peppered throughout the region.

As of February, according to an article written by Oriana Pawlyk for Military.com:

“Saudi Arabian coalition jets bombing Houthi rebel sites in Yemen increasingly turn to U.S. Air Force tankers for refueling support almost two years after the conflict began. Since April 2015, the Air Force has logged 1,778 tanker sorties for the operation, Air Forces Central Command spokeswoman Capt. Kathleen Atanasoff told Military.com on Tuesday. That includes 1,069 over the past year, an increase of 360, or 50 percent, from the 709 in the previous period.‘These operations are ongoing, with aircraft refueling occurring daily,’ Atanasoff said in an email. The service’s tankers such as KC- 135 Stratotankers and KC-10 Extenders participated in 7,564 refueling ‘events’ with coalition aircraft, with ‘about 54 million pounds of fuel off-loaded in support of Saudi operations in Yemen,’ Atanasoff said.”

Donald Trump, doing his best Barack Obama impression, has been more than happy to sell the Saudis hundreds of billions of dollars worth of weapons to continue their genocide. These include planes, ships, rockets, precision-guided bombs, cluster bombs, etc. American defense contractors, particularly Lockheed Martin and Boeing, are likewise more than happy to rake in their handsome profits from Yemen’s destruction. With Jared Kushner playing the role of matchmaker for Mohammed bin Salman and Marillyn A. Hewson (CEO of Lockheed), the profits will surely escalate.

However, the Saudis have another powerful ally in this war, al Qaeda. This certainly makes the upcoming debate on Yemen a great opportunity for the House to finally get around to discussing the legality of high treason. Or more specifically, fighting another war for al Qaeda.

In addition to the coalition’s sadistic air campaign, Yemini civilians are threatened and attacked on the ground day in and day out by Sudanese mercenaries, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), and a local Islamic State affiliate. All of whom support the coalition.

In an article published in The Hill, Gareth Porter and retired Col. Lawrence Wilkerson (former Secretary of State Colin Powell’s Chief of Staff) said:

“U.S. intelligence and counter-terrorism officials have regarded AQAP as even more of a foreign terrorist threat to the United States than ISIS. It mounted efforts to bring down U.S. airlines three times between 2009 and 2012, and nearly succeeded twice. But the Saudi/UAE war in Yemen has made them the most powerful indigenous armed group in southern Yemen, with more money, arms and territorial control than ever before. The Saudi-led coalition and the forces of the Saudi backed former regime have allied openly with AQAP and even fought alongside them. As a result of the war AQAP is now poised for the first time to compete for national power in Yemen.”

See the map below of the military situation in Yemen as of this July for an idea of just how much territory AQAP has consolidated. The areas shaded white are controlled by AQAP, the pink areas are controlled by Hadi-loyal forces, and the green areas are controlled by the Houthi/Saleh alliance:

This is further evidence that U.S. involvement in the Saudi war is illegal. When asked for a justification for U.S. involvement in the Saudi/UAE war, both Barrack Obama and Donald Trump’s administrations have cited the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF). That AUMF permits military action only against those entities who perpetrated the attacks on 9/11. In other words, military action is only permitted against al Qaeda. Yet, this war is being fought on behalf of al Qaeda against their enemies, the Houthis.

Indeed, Asher Orkaby made the point in Foreign Affairs that, “far from being aligned with extremists, the Houthi movement has repeatedly clashed with the Islamic State and AQAP” So, in addition to the fact that this war was never authorized under the War Powers Act, it is also clearly not covered under the current AUMF.

Since the Obama administration, this is at least the third major conflict wherein the U.S. has found itself aligned with, fighting along side, arming, and/or supporting al Qaeda. This was official policy notably during the regime change operation in Libya and in the failed regime change operation in Syria. It is very important to note that if things had gone to plan in Syria, al Qaeda would have almost certainly taken Damascus.

Neoconservatives are now calling for a new AUMF to explicitly define ‘the enemy’ more broadly as proponents of so called, ‘radical Islam’. The ‘radical Islam’ handle is a red herring callously promoted by the fake news establishment. It is meant to dumb down and obscure the realities of these conflicts for domestic audiences. The cynical neoconservatives are pleased to have Americans view all Arabs and Muslims as one homogenous and terrifying collective. Most Americans are designedly oblivious to the differences between Sunnis, Shiites, and other branches of Islam. It is in the interests of the War Party for American voters to see such radically opposed groups as Daesh and Hezbollah as cut from the same cloth. This is obviously done in order to prevent rational discussion of these conflicts from ever taking place. For if the American people were well informed of the consequences of U.S. policy abroad, especially in the Middle East, they would probably not even passively support their regime’s policies.

In 2013, popular sentiment from people of all political stripes helped to prevent Obama’s would have been Iraq-style invasion of Syria. I believe one of the primary reasons for this was the effectiveness of the famous ‘I will not fight for al Qaeda in Syria’ social media campaign undertaken by active military personnel. Americans do not want to support and subsidize al Qaeda in Syria, Libya, Yemen, or anywhere else for that matter. The reason these horrific policies persist is not the peoples’ apathy, it’s their ignorance.

This is a particularly indefensible war, even by U.S standards. If they choose to, this is a war the American people can end. The establishment is certainly not comfortable publicly debating and defending their Yemen policy. Exposing the realities of this conflict and ending the war in Yemen could trigger an anti-war domino effect. Not since the Vietnam War has there been more fertile soil for an American anti-war movement.

Please continue to call your Congressmen and women and tell them to vote against the war on November 13th. Give them some good talking points for the debate. Please share, retweet posts from Yemenis on the ground, post news items, write blog posts, write articles, and speak your mind about the war in Yemen on social media. Do not be afraid to talk about the U.S.-Saudi/AQAP alliance. We have the truth on our side.


READ MORE YEMEN NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Yemen Files




Rand Paul's Speech on Saudi Arabia Arms Deal

Published on Jun 13, 2017

Senator Rand Paul makes a passionate speech about rejecting the Saudi Arabia arms deal because of the increased harm it would do to the region and the United States

Check out Rand Paul's website here






"They're killing lots of people. By the indirection of their actions, they're killing potentially half a billion people over time. The greatest humanitarian tragedy since World War II." 

-- Col. Larry Wilkerson --

Most of Congress "Likes War" and Opposes Ending US Support for Saudi War in Yemen

"There's no defense. It's a brutal, bloody war, as I pointed out. It's a major humanitarian disaster, and the United States has no business participating in it. It's that clear. It's that simple."

-- Col. Larry Wilkerson --


Published on Nov 6, 2017

Several members of Congress have introduced legislation to invoke the War Powers Act with an aim to shut down US support for Saudi Arabia's war in Yemen, but the resolution will not pass because the vast majority in Congress doesn't oppose war explains Col. Larry Wilkerson

Original Transcription



[Highlighted Emphasis Added]

SHARMINI PERIES: It's the Real News Network. I'm Sharmini Peries coming to you from Baltimore. In October, Representative Ro Khanna, Democrat from California, Thomas Massie, Republican from Kentucky, Mark Pocan, Democrat from Wisconsin and Walter Jones, Republican from North Carolina introduced a bipartisan resolution to stop the U.S. military assistance to Saudi Arabia in its war against the Houthis in Yemen. This bill has the support of 34 other lawmakers who are willing to invoke the War Powers Act, where Congress can swiftly terminate the U.S. military assistance for Saudi Arabia's war in Yemen. But some congressional representatives on both sides of the House are reluctant to do so and to end the war that the UN says is the worst humanitarian disaster of the 21st century. The UN is expressing concern at the Saudi led coalition's closing of two airports, seaports, and land crossings in Yemen, warning that this may hamper the delivery of vitally needed humanitarian aid to the Yemeni people where 14.5 million are cut off from access to clean water and sanitation.

There are some 200,000 people suffering from cholera outbreak and over 1,300 of them have already died where a quarter of them were children. Who in Congress might be objecting to stopping this war and why? Let's find out from Colonel Larry Wilkerson. Larry is a retired U.S. colonel and former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, now a distinguished professor at the College of William and Mary. Larry, good to have you with us.

LARRY WILKERSON Good to be with you, Sharmini.

SHARMINI PERIES: Larry, you've been on the Hill working on this effort. Why don't you tell us about the debates that's going on and the debate that's not going on. From what I understand, the bill will pass on but no debate will be taking place in the House, but mostly who is reluctant to pass this bill?

LARRY WILKERSON: I think probably Democrats and Republicans alike, so caught up in the war machine that this country has become, are guilty, guilty as charged. What you have with Walt Jones from North Carolina is a pariah Republican from the very start. What you have with Ro Khanna, and with Mark Pocan and with Tom Massie from Kentucky, Republicans and Democrats, and the co-sponsors are those within the Congress who have the moral courage and the understanding of U.S. history and the U.S. Constitution sufficient to apply it to what is U.S. Code Title 50, Chapter 33, sections 1541 to 48, as I recall, which codifies the War Powers Resolution. Now,a little history there, that's the resolution Congress passed to reassert its constitutional powers over the war power when it grew very, very tired of the Vietnam conflict, and Richard Nixon, in particular, conduct of that conflict towards the end of it.

They essentially told the president, "You've got to do this in order to wage war," abbreviating the Constitution, Article one, Section eight, a bit but nonetheless reaffirming it mostly. Nixon vetoed it, and then the Congress, very unusually, passed the legislation over Nixon's veto. Now they are up to the point where you can only find these iconoclastic members, these pariah members, these members who understand the Constitution, who understand our history and more than anything understand how dangerous is the war power to the very liberties of this republic. That's all you have left in the Congress who would, as you pointed out in your introduction, bring the United States' action to support Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in waging this brutal, bloody war, which incidentally the Saudis and the UAE are losing. They're losing it.

They don't, they're the only ones who want to do this and so this legislation is being fought by hook and crook by everyone from Mark Thornberry, the Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee who loves to have Raytheon and Lockheed Martin making lots of money off the weapons we're selling to Saudi Arabia, to Ed Royce, the Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee who ultimately has committee jurisdiction over the bill. They all want to stop it, because very frankly, Sharmini, they like war.

SHARMINI PERIES: They like war. When the United Nations is putting out such warnings about the conditions of so many, 14.5 million people who are suffering from this war, the devastation is staring them in the face, there's so many children affected by this, what are their main motivations for not wanting to support this bill?

LARRY WILKERSON They say, in the legislation that we could cite that Steny Hoyer and others have written as an alternative to our legislation, which is called House Continuing Resolution 81, invoking the War Powers and which should enjoy privileged status under the law and therefore have to go to the House for a vote and not be stoppable by a committee chairman. What they're doing is offering 599, which if you read all the whereases, and boy does it go ad nauseam into the whereases, "Whereas this, whereas this, whereas this," if you read it closely, what you see is, they're trying to excuse the Saudis for what they're doing. They know darn well that all those whereases in that other legislation, which recognize the nature of the humanitarian disaster, recognize the nature of the UN recognition of the government supposedly the Saudis are trying to defend, recognize the fact that Iran is participating and so forth.

Of course, they don't point out that Iran wasn't even in Yemen until the Saudis attacked, that Iran wasn't doing anything until the Saudis attacked. All of this legislation that Hoyer and others have put together, and Hoyer by the way, is a Democrat, of course, from Maryland, is just a subterfuge, an obfuscation of the true issue, which is, the Saudis are fighting a brutal, bloody war. They're killing lots of people. By the indirection of their actions, they're killing potentially half a billion people over time. The greatest humanitarian tragedy since World War II. They're bombing sewage and water plants. They're bombing food sources and so forth, and all this to support a government that I think the UN would probably like to retract its vote on in terms of being the legitimate government of Yemen. It is, a piece of this 599 is a piece of legislation that shows just how many ends these folks will go to in order to justify what is truly a brutal war in which the United States is participating.

On top of that, the U.S. participation is causing Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, one of the most dangerous terrorist groups with a global capability, to grow, to actually harden and grow in its membership and in its actions. At the same time, we're trying to stop that group under a legitimate AUMF, the one passed after 9/11, in Yemen with Special Operating Forces. We want to separate those two actions. The Special Operating Forces going after Al-Qaeda in Yemen are operating under the original Authorization for the Use of Military Force and therefore are legitimate. This support to the Saudi-UAE effort to wage this war in Yemen, though, is not legitimate. It's illegal. It was started by the Obama administration and continued and emphasized by the Trump administration. It's illegal. It's brutal. It's being lost by Saudi Arabia.

You saw the architect of the war, Mohammad Bin Salman effecting something we haven't seen since the formation of the House of Saud, recently, the last few days. He actually got rid of 11 princes. He's getting rid of a lot of business leaders and so forth. I think this is a sign of the instability of the Saud regime under MBS's leadership, and it's going to be interesting to see how this develops, because this is his war. He started it. There's no defense. It's a brutal, bloody war, as I pointed out. It's a major humanitarian disaster, and the United States has no business participating in it. It's that clear. It's that simple.

SHARMINI PERIES: Right. Larry, give us a sense of what they're telling you when you're on the Hill about this unconditional support for Saudi Arabia's war.

LARRY WILKERSON: You'd be amazed, Sharmini. I have gotten answers from staffers and members that range the gamut from, "Well, this is just a niche issue." That's a direct quote. "This is just a niche issue." My response, of course, was, "500,000 people dying is a niche issue?" Well, not a lot, and get them a little off guard with that kind of response, to a response such as this, "Well, I always go with my committee chairman." That is, the committee of jurisdiction. "So, if Ed Royce is going to go against this, I've got to go against it, too." This is the war power. This is your nation using bombs, bullets and bayonets to kill the citizens of other nations and, oh, by the way, put its own men and women in harm's way too.

This is the war power. This is the ultimate power, and you bow to your committee of jurisdiction? Come on, Mr. Congressman. You can do better than that. To an answer like this one that I got, "Well, Iran's there." My response, "Iran wasn't there until the Saudi-UAE coalition attacked and we supported them." "Well, Iran is there now, so we've got to fight them. The Saudis are doing our dirty business for us." Why do we have to fight Iran in Yemen? What is it that Iran is doing in Yemen that's destabilizing, and destabilizing in a way that threatens U.S. national security interest? "Well, Iran always does that." Are you kidding me, Congressman? Can't you think more critically than that? Can't you think more analytically than that? Iran is not always going against U.S. interest. Iran, in this case, is going against U.S. interest, if they are, because we are supporting the Saudi coalition that's waging this brutal war.

You just wouldn't believe it, Sharmini. The first reaction I have is that they don't know what they're talking about. The second reaction I have is that they're venal, they're cruel, they're brutal. The third reaction I have is, they're ignorant, they're just not willing to look at the issues. And the fourth reaction I have is that they're in obeisance to the military-industrial complex, which, if you'll look at the contribution charts, does, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing and so forth does contribute a heck of a lot of money to these people's campaigns. And so with a little war like this, what's a little war as long as it maintains me in power?

SHARMINI PERIES: Only the lives of hundreds of thousands of children.

LARRY WILKERSON: Yes. Yes, and just, I mean, when you've got a situation where, for example, you bomb cranes at the only port where you really can offload the food and clean water to save people's lives and you, the United States, recognizing these cranes have been bombed and that the water and the food can't be off-lifted until the cranes are replaced then provide the cranes out of the goodness of your heart, I hope to replace them, only to have the cranes not able to be off-loaded and reinstalled because of Saudi-UAE bombing. Bombing which you're supporting with refueling tankers, with targeting intelligence and so forth. This is not just nonsense, though. It's brutal. Brutal nonsense.

SHARMINI PERIES: Larry, thank you for your relentless work on the Hill and I wish you more success. Thank you.

LARRY WILKERSON: Thank you, Sharmini.

SHARMINI PERIES: And thank you for joining us here on The Real News Network.






Addicted to War: Why the U.S. Can't Kick Militarism

Published on May 21, 2007

Visit www.addictedtowar.com and www.arlingtonwestsantamonica.org for more information. Addicted to War: Why the U.S. Can't kick Militarism. An illustrated expose by Joel Andreas. Also of interest Arlington West



America's Addiction To War
- Dennis Kucinich -

Published on Oct 16, 2017

In this video, Luke Rudkowski of WeAreChange interviews former Congressman Dennis Kucinich. They discuss redistricting and how it negatively affected his seat in the Cleveland area. They also discuss the Military Industrial Conflict and the United States addiction to war.

Dennis Kucinich
Tells Jesse Ventura
"This Is A Racket! A Way For People Who Make Arms To Cash In!"

The Middle Blitz
Published on Nov 24, 2017

The problem today we have in Washington is that both political parties have converged with the military-industrial complex, fulfilling President Eisenhower’s nightmare and setting America on a path toward destruction.

Rescuing America from a future “cataclysmic war,” Kucinich argues, requires that Americans both “realize that our position in the world was never, ever meant to be a cop on the beat, a global cop,” and “challenge this two-party duopoly that’s committed to war.”


"Woe to him who builds a city with bloodshed and establishes a town by injustice!"

Habakkuk 2:12  Link


War Corporatism - What Barry Says

Sean Ackley
Published on Apr 23, 2007

What happens when you cross aNeocon organization like PNAC (Project for the New American Century), war politics, the Carlyle Group and very evil men?

Winner, Best Animation at the Brooklyn International Film and the Portabello Film Festival...and rightly so!

Why Terrorism Will Never Stop


Published on Nov 1, 2017

In this video, Luke Rudkowski of WeAreChange gives you the latest breaking news on the events in New York NYC with reactions from U.S President Donald Trump, U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer and the general left-right paradigm.


The American Way of War

Published on Mar 22, 2009

More at

Eugene Jarecki is an award-winning dramatic and documentary filmmaker whose previous film WHY WE FIGHT won the 2005 Grand Jury Prize at the Sundance Film Festival. THE TRIALS OF HENRY KISSINGER, won the 2002 Amnesty International Award. In addition to his work in film, Jarecki is also the Founder and Executive Director of The Eisenhower Project, an academic public policy group, dedicated in the spirit of Dwight D. Eisenhower, to studying the forces that shape American foreign policy.


The American Way of War pt.2

Published on Mar 24, 2009

More at

E. Jarecki: Make arms-manufacturers' political engineering and currying favor with Congress - illegal



Leaving Iraq mostly rhetoric pt. 3

Published on Mar 25, 2009

More at therealnews.com/t/index.php?op...

Eugene Jarecki: We won't leave Iraq as long as oil is the 'life blood' of our global dominance


Big Government's Best Friend

Published on Mar 2, 2012

Bestselling author Tom Woods speaks at the Mises Institute's seminar at Furman University, "War: Big Government's Best Friend." Sponsored by the Conservative Students for a Better Tomorrow. www.TomWoods.com 


Conservatism and War

A great many books and articles on the moral and strategic imperative of nonintervention have been written; my aim here is simply to introduce the reader to some of the key ideas.

A few of my own pieces on the subject:

Do Conservatives Hate Their Own Founder? Russell Kirk on Militarism by Thomas Woods
Come Home, Conservatives — To the Antiwar Conservative Movement by Thomas Woods
The Conservative Case Against the War: A Review by Thomas Woods
No Patronizing, No Sloganeering by Thomas Woods

Daniel P. McCarthy, editor of The American Conservative magazine, gives a good overview of the correct conservative foreign policy in this extended interview (part one deals primarily with domestic issues):

Tom Woods: Conservatives and War

AStarSpangledGrl SanDiego
Published on Nov 23, 2011




We Need to Talk About the Iran Protests


Published on Jan 5, 2018

Are these protests in Iran spontaneous, or are they the result of another regime change operation? This week on The Corbett Report James explores the past, present and future of US and Israeli involvement in Iran, and the attempts to foment unrest in the country.


TRANSCRIPT, SOURCES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=25512


USA, Israel & Saudi Arabia Prepping for Zionist War With Iran


End Times News Report
Published on Dec 9, 2017

War with Iran is inevitable. The Zionist puppet masters have been trying for years to start a war with Iran and that reality has never been closer than it is today. The USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia are all making coordinated moves in preparation for a major war.

Link: C.I.A. 
(the link has been updated)




“This channel [Truthstream Media] has covered multiple times that Iran is so much in the crosshairs, it’s such a persistent target. It’s such a country that these war generals and policy wonks in Washington are salivating over, that an actual entire book was written by the Brookings Institute - yeah satan’s own think tank - raising the question, ’which path to Persia?’ Not whether there would be a conflict in Iran, not whether they seek regime change, but how to get there and maintain international credibility. And they ran through everything from a false flag attack, to a joint air strike with Israel or Saudi Arabia, to a domino situation with Syria or surrounding countries, to a PT boat confrontation and much more.” 

-- Aaron Dykes, journalist, Truthstream Media, video : While Everyone Was Busy Being Distracted by Texas… --




Steve Pieczenik Sharply Rebukes Trump & Neocon Generals for Insidious ‘Afghanistan Strategy’

“…More men will die, men will die! Trump has now created a greater, greater graveyard for our men which shouldn’t have been there in the first place. It’s absolute nonsense!”

“There was no terrorist attack from Afghanistan or Iraq and these generals know it. They’re lying, they’re cowards, moral cowards, and they’re ineffectual. And I say that as a former Rear Admiral and a Military Officer who resigned my commission with honor. And I find them disgraceful! This is the most absurd thing you could have done. Trump is now on notice that we will work against him.”

“This is 6Trillion Dollars in that WAR, and who’s going to make money?…KBR. Who makes money in Africa?…KBR. What are we doing in Djibouti?…The same thing. I’ve got soldiers who come back and say, ‘what the hell was I doing in Africa? Why am I in Djibouti, Sudan, Somalia?’ The soldiers have no idea what they’re doing!” -- Steve Pieczenik


Alex Jones Heated Debate On Trump & Afghanistan

- Alex Jones vs Steve Pieczenik -

Published on Aug 22, 2017

Alex Jones Heated Debate On President Trump And Afghanistan - Alex Jones vs dr steve pieczenik

MORE HERE : Troops Protect Government Drug Dealing




US Signs $12 Billion Arms Deal With Qatar Days After Saying It Funds Terrorism




f course, Washington’s logic is riddled with absurdity.
To claim that its forces are acting in self-defense overlooks the glaring reality that the US-led military coalition has no legal mandate whatsoever to be in Syria in the first place. Its forces are in breach of international law by operating on Syrian territory without the consent of the government in Damascus and without a mandate from the UN Security Council."

[From Article Below]


[Absolute Must-Watch Videos]

"The U.S. is an Invader In Syria...The U.S. Has No Business in Syria."

"The US & the coalition are in Syria without any permission, w/o any lawful authority to be present."

U.S. Illegal Military Base in Syria

Lew Rockwell talks to RT Inter-national.

"The people the U.S. is supporting in Syria, for example the Kurdish-forces spend most of their time attacking Syrian Christians and the Armenian Christians, ethnically cleansing their villages killing people...U.S. NEEDS TO GET OUT OF SYRIA, STOP BRINGING ON WAR."


Overthrowing Assad: US Policy in Syria Undermines Legitimate Government

Published on Jun 30, 2017

Syria and Russia warn the latest accusations about chemical weapons are just a flimsy pretext for a new US strike on Syria. One America's Pearson Sharp has the latest, and spoke with Virginia Senator Richard Black, who says the US is waging an illegal war to overthrow President Assad.

"Some members of the coalition may say “We are in clear violation of international law, maybe this is not right.” Others bought into this coalition to be part of a group fighting ISIS, and now they are saying “Wait a minute. We didn’t go into Syria to fight the legitimate duly elected government of Syria; we went there to fight this terrorist organization.”…The coalition is certainly not there to help the Syrian people; it is there to help Saudi Arabia with its Wahhabi radical Islamic domination of the entire world beginning with the countries close to it".


Who Is The Aggressor In Syria?

Published on Feb 12, 2018

Just when it seemed the war in Syria might be winding down, it heats back up. First a Russian plane is shot down, then an Israeli plane is shot down after completing a bombing run on Syrian territory. Meanwhile the US continues occupying parts of northeast Syria with no legal basis in US or international law...


"The thing that is concerning is that the United States has established a military base within the sovereign territory of Syria. Now up until now we've had four bases in Turkey Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Jordan all training terrorist to invade the Syrian nation...this is one instance in which we actually have a 300 man base, which is actually located within Syria without the permission of the Syrian government of course, again in clear violation of international law..."

"We now have the Bush, Obama, Trump doctrine of regime change..."

US Expands Military Footprint in Syria to Eight Bases, ‘Modifies’ Kobani Air Base


More US Bases In Syria...Why Not Come Home?

Published on Jan 17, 2018

Why is the US building more military bases on Syrian territory without permission? Why is it funding and training a 30,000 strong border guard for Syria's borders with Turkey and Iraq? With ISIS defeated, does the White House really believe it has legal authority to keep US troops in Syria to "deter Iran"?






Syria : US Flagrant Aggression  is Absurdly Described as 'Self-Defence'


June 20, 2017 BY 21WIRE

Finian Cunningham
Strategic Culture Foundation

The shooting down of a Syrian fighter jet by US forces this week comes on the back of several aggressive actions by American military on the ground. Taken together the US actions mark an alarming escalation of intervention in the Syrian war – to the point where the Americans can be said to be now openly at war against Syria.

The American military actions also come despite repeated warnings from Russia against such unilateral deployment of force. Following the shoot-down of the Syrian SU-22 fighter bomber this week, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov  denounced the American violence as an act of «flagrant aggression» against a sovereign state. Some Russian lawmakers such as Duma foreign affairs chief Alexei Pushkov went further and condemned it as an act of war by the Americans.

Of course, Washington’s logic is riddled with absurdity. To claim that its forces are acting in self-defense overlooks the glaring reality that the US-led military coalition has no legal mandate whatsoever to be in Syria in the first place. Its forces are in breach of international law by operating on Syrian territory without the consent of the government in Damascus and without a mandate from the UN Security Council.

Another absurdity is the claim that the US forces are «protecting» militants whom they are supposedly training to «fight» the Islamic State terror group (ISIS). On at least three occasions over the past month, American military have carried out air strikes on Syrian government forces and their allies near a strategically important border crossing between Syria and Iraq. The Americans claim that the Syrian government forces were posing a threat to a military base at Al Tanf on the Syrian side of the border where they are training militants belonging to a group called Maghawir al Thawra. 

The Pentagon claims that these militants are being trained to «fight and defeat» ISIS. The installation last week of long-range artillery batteries known as HIMARS at Al Tanf was justified as a self-defense measure. US Colonel Ryan Dillon said: «We have increased our military footprint and are prepared for any threat that is presented to us by the pro-regime forces».

As with the shooting down of the Syrian fighter jet this week, American forces are invoking «self-defense» as a legal rationale. But as Moscow has pointed out, the Americans have no legal right to be present on Syrian territory and then, secondly, to be unilaterally declaring «deconfliction zones» for what are de facto invasive forces.

A further nail to the American lie is exposed when the nature of the militant group is looked at more closely. Unverified video footage showing the US-backed militants at Al Tanf indicates that they are another brand of jihadist terrorism. The videos show Maghawir al Thawra militants repeatedly shouting the jihadist slogan «allu akbar». They are also equipped with the notorious top-of-the-range white Toyota land cruisers that other jihadist groups have obtained through funding by Saudi Arabia and other Gulf monarchies.

Syrian sources have confirmed to this author that the group displayed in the videos is indeed the Maghawir al Thawra and that they are unquestionably jihadist. Yet this is the same group that the US has openly declared to be training at its military base at Al Tanf to «fight and defeat ISIS», and which the US is supposedly «protecting» from advancing Syrian army units and their allies.

What’s more, it is  reported that in addition to American forces at Al Tanf, there are British and other NATO troops, as well as those from two other Arab states. This amounts to a full-scale US-NATO intervention in the Syrian war – an intervention which seems to be clearly on the side of jihadist terror groups.

After the shooting down of the Syrian warplane by American forces this week, Moscow noted pointedly that Washington has openly taken sides with terror groups aiming to topple the sovereign government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. There can be no other pretense.

The bolstering of the US military footprint at the Al Tanf base near the Syrian-Iraqi border is another sign of brazen American siding with terror groups. As the videos above show, the notion that these militants are somehow «moderate rebels» who are combating ISIS does not bear scrutiny.

This US-led charade of supporting «moderate rebels» has been going on for nearly six years in Syria. The mercurial «Free Syrian Army» and the «Syrian Defense Forces» are part of this smoke and mirrors game designed to obscure the fact that the Americans and their NATO allies are using proxy militant groups dominated by jihadist terror networks, for the objective of regime change. The plethora of different names for these proxies – all whom are illegally armed groups – is just part of the cynical game to conceal the fact that Washington and its allies are waging a criminal war against a sovereign nation.

As independent investigative journalist Vanessa Beeley told this author: «The labelling by the US of any extremist faction fighting in Syria as a Free Syrian Army division is nothing more than a cynical marketing ploy to rebrand these group as ‘moderate’».

Beeley says that the Maghawir al Thawra militants whom the US claim to be protecting in a supposed campaign to defeat ISIS is just another instance of Washington «rebranding terror groups as moderates».

Another giveaway to the real nature of this US-patronized group came from a Reutersreport in which one of the Maghawir commanders was interviewed.

Maghawir al Thawra spokesman Abu al Atheer said the goal of the US forces was to take the eastern Syrian city of Deir Ezzor. That city is already under the control of the Syrian government forces and their allies. If the US and its militants were motivated to defeat ISIS, then why are they moving on Deir Ezzor?

The Maghawir commander also revealed his extremist ideological affiliations when he went on to talk about Iranian-backed forces allied with the Syrian government. «The battle is not over and we will not allow the Iranian Shi’ites to occupy our land. Our response to those who stand against us will be cruel», he told Reuters.

Recall this is the same supposedly «moderate» group whom the US, British and Norwegian NATO troops are training at Al Tanf and for which the US has installed long-range artillery batteries in «an act of self-defense».

Events in Syria seem to be spiraling toward a bigger international war. This week Iran hit ISIS bases near Deir Ezzor with medium range ballistic missiles fired from inside Iranian territory. Tehran says the action was coordinated with the Syrian government. Meanwhile, the US is stepping up its direct assault on Syrian government forces.

Another telling development in the slide to wider war is that the US forces are moving towards blatantly defending jihadists like Maghawir al Thawra from Syrian, Russian and Iranian forces who are the only ones actually taking the battle to defeat jihadists. The US mask of hiding behind «moderate rebels» is slipping. Washington is now seen to be increasingly at war in Syria. It seems only a matter of time before US forces come into direct clash with Russian and Iranian military.


Finian Cunningham is a former editor and writer for major news media organizations. He has written extensively on international affairs, with articles published in several languages

READ MORE SYRIA NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire SYRIA Files



Donald Trump's Foreign Policy That The Media Won't Mention

Published on Jun 19, 2017

In this video, Luke Rudkowski of WeAreChange reports on the latest breaking news between the failing relations between Russia and the United States. As Donald Trump faces off against Vladimir Putin the stakes couldn't be any higher.

Visit our MAIN SITE for more breaking news http://wearechange.org/

Syrian Warplane Engaging ISIS Shot Down By U.S-Led Coalition!

Published on Jun 18, 2017

Reports are now confirming that a U.S-Led Coalition has just shot down a Syrian warplane inside of southern Raqqa in Syria WHILE it was engaging ISIS so in this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth shows how there is no longer any question as to who the real face of terror is in the middle east!

For more info from Press For Truth visit: http://pressfortruth.ca/



"The coalition is certainly not there to help the Syrian people; it is there to help Saudi Arabia with its Wahhabi radical Islamic domination of the entire world beginning with the countries close to it"

-- U.S. Senator Richard Black --





[Trump's Gross Hypocrisy & Shameful Genuflecting To M.I.C.]Trump In Saudi Arabia - 'Peace In Our Time?'

President Trump was in Saudi Arabia over the weekend, where he signed the largest US arms sale ever, praised the country's history and record, and declared war on Iran, Syria...and possibly Russia. Some first foreign trip...


Published on Nov 4, 2016

WATCH FULL INTERVIEW HERE: https://youtu.be/_sbT3_9dJY4

In the second excerpt from the John Pilger Special, to be exclusively broadcast by RT on Saturday, courtesy of Dartmouth Films, Julian Assange accuses Hillary Clinton of misleading Americans about the true scope of Islamic State’s support from Washington’s Middle East allies.

An Update on Blocking The Saudi Arms Deal with Senator Rand Paul

Streamed live on May 31, 2017

What's the latest on Trump's arms deal with Saudi Arabia? Senator Rand Paul visits Texas to be a live guest on today's Liberty Report! We get an update on Rand's bill to block the arms sale, as well as a thorough look of the U.S. government's total lack of good judgement in providing arms to the world's leading state sponsor of terror.

Hold Trump accountable; he is supporting ISIS with weapons just like Obama, and builds our M.I.C. with the bloodmoney for a never ending cycle of war. It can not be any clearer that all who oppose terrorism have been betrayed for the war and surveillance profiteers - who all benefit from this blantanly obvious manufactured war on terror.

Take action and relentlessly call your senator to stop this crime. Actively get this information to your family and friends, spread all relative vids, links and articles, and call in to talk radio.

Proxy War for Middle East Control - Saudi Arabia vs Yemen = USA vs IRAN -

Published on Apr 23, 2015

Jake Morphonios explains the background to the deadly conflict between Saudi Arabia and Yemen. Included in this video are the following subjects: [click video title for detailed notes]

Links :

Full Spectrum Dominance



The Truth About Yemen - With Vanessa Beeley

Aug 17, 2017

More than two years after a Saudi-led coalition began attacking Yemen, the country is a wasteland. Thousands of airstrikes, scores of children killed, epidemics, misery. Who's really responsible and what can be done?

The Truth About Yemen - With Vanessa Beeley

Written by Daniel McAdams

The misery inflicted on the Yemeni people by two years of US-backed Saudi warfare is almost unimaginable. Western press are either silent or they promote pro-war propaganda. Why is Washington selling Saudi Arabia the weapons to commit genocide on the Yemeni people? We get the real news from investigative journalist Vanessa Beeley in today's Liberty Report:

Daniel Mcadams - ronpaulinstitute.org - rightly asked,
"How many US service members may be killed by US weapons fallen into the wrong hands in places like Syria and Iraq? What kind blowback might be ignited by Saudi genocide in Yemen made possible by US-made weapons? Do we want the families of innocent victims of Saudi wars to see "Made in America" on the weapons that killed their loved ones?"




Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Introduces Bill to Stop Arming Terrorists

Behind Tulsi Gabbard's 'Stop Arming Terrorists' bill

Published on Jan 13, 2017

Congresswoman, one of the first Democrats to meet with President-elect Trump, explains her bill to stop the government from directly or indirectly arming, funding terror groups who are enemies of US but would help overthrow the Syrian government #Tucker

[Trump betrayed her and us all]




"Trump essentially continues to massively fund terrorism, including future attacks on American targets via the CIA and the Deep State"

(Quote from Article Below)

Trump Bows Deeply to Globalists, Surrenders to Puppet Masters


By Larry Chin
Global Research, May 23, 2017

In bowing and groveling before Saudi royalty and the all-powerful Israeli regime and Washington-controlling Israeli lobby, President Donald Trump continues to demonstrate that he is a puppet of globalist masters, the Deep State, and the existing international criminal political establishment.

In signing over the single largest arms deal in US history with Saudi Arabia, “both the neo-cons in DC, as well as the all-powerful American Military-Industrial complex can declare a truly unprecedented victory”. It is also a triumph for the CIA, and the CIA’s international network of terror fronts, including ISIS and Al-Qaeda. This arms deal, globalism on super steroids, is on top of already immeasurable military-industrial lucre, a mushrooming Pentagon budget, and a CIA black budget that is uncounted as well as bottomless.

It is a promise that the existing criminal Anglo-American war and terrorism agenda—the Bush-Obama-Clinton/New World Order blueprint for conquest—not only continues, but receives a super escalation, towards regime change in Syria, as well as continuing aggression towards Iran.

Trump essentially continues to massively fund terrorism, including future attacks on American targets via the CIA and the Deep State, while spewing nonsensical hot air about fighting terrorism. His performance was tantamount to lecturing a den of chuckling mafia godfathers about the dangers of crime, while paying them billions of dollars. Trump will do the same in Israel, where Jared Kushner, who is deeply connected to Netanyahu and Israeli interests, will cut yet more power deals on behalf of Tel Aviv.  (Article Continues Below)

Keys to the Kingdom:

Trump visits Saudi Arabia first, signs $380bn deal

[ Including An Arms Deal Worth $110Billion ]

Published on May 20, 2017

Donald Trump's received a lavish, royal welcome in Saudi Arabia, where he's kicking off his first foreign tour as U.S. president. Trump's signed a number of defence and business deals totalling in excess of $380bn, including an arms deal worth $110bn. Trump is the first American president to make Saudi Arabia, or any Muslim-majority country, his inaugural stop overseas and he's pleased with his progress so far. READ MORE: https://on.rt.com/8c79

(Article Continued)

Lee Stranahan is among many who is alarmed by Trump’s 180 degree reversal from long-held views, and views pushed by Trump throughout his election campaign.

“Here’s what you wrote about Saudi Arabia in the past, POTUS. Your 180 on this subject is very distburbing.” Trump previously wrote:

  “It’s the world’s biggest funder of terrorism. Saudi Arabia funnels our petrodollars, our very own money, to fund the terrorists that seek to destroy our people while the Saudis rely on us to protect them.”

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard also blasted Trump with a series of Twitter posts:

   “Trump refuses to acknowledge Saudi Arabia remains world’s largest sponsor of terror and Wahhabi Salafist ideology fueling al-Qaeda/ISIS.”

  “Opening counter-terrorism center in Saudi is a farce; Saudi is #1 exporter of Wahhabi Salafi jihadist ideology that fuels grps like ISIS/AQ”

Even Trump’s most ardent supporters are worried. Roger Stone was sickened by the sight of Trump bowing to the Saudis, and posted:

  “While I support our President, disturbing 2 see @realDonaldTrump embrace those who financed 9/11 attack on America”

Alex Jones was similarly disturbed:

  “The House of Saudi is the number one $ of terror. They better rollover after Trump bent over or I am pissed!”

Trip itself is capitulation

Trump’s foreign junket amply demonstrates how little control Trump has over his own actions. According to Mike Cernovich was forced to make the trip by the globalists who actually control the White House, and who drive foreign policy: National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster, Deputy National Security Advisor Dina Habib Powell (and here) and Chief Economic Advisor Gary Cohn (and see here).

This neocon Saudi lobby has co-opted the White House, along with Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump (Dina Habib Powell is Ivanka Trump’s advisor). This is the definition of an internal coup, and a continuing political suicide that Trump himself has enabled, and seems unwilling and unable to recognize or combat.

The arms and nuclear weapons deal itself was orchestrated by McMaster, according to Cernovich, all towards a ground war in Syria.

Powell is close to Hillary Clinton aide and Muslim Brotherhood-connected Huma Abedin, Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett, and others who are working to destroy Trump. Both McMaster and Habib Powell are suspected of leaking anti-Trump stories to the Washington Post and New York Times.

Between his continuing foreign policy capitulations, the appointment of dangerous Bush neocon and 9/11 fixer Robert Mueller as a special prosecutor to dog his presidency, and the looming appointment of another political enemy (such as Joe Lieberman) as FBI director, Trump’s sabotaged, bleeding presidency appears doomed.

Full Transcript of Trump's Riyadh Speech:










"This is the same Donald Trump who on the campaign trail told Fox & Friends, “Who blew up the World Trade Center? It wasn't the Iraqis, it was Saudi--take a look at Saudi Arabia, open the documents.” Now, instead of opening the documents ON Saudi Arabia, Trump is opening the purse FOR Saudi Arabia." - Chuck Baldwin


Globalists Using Donald Trump To Take America Into War

Chuck Baldwin
Published: Thursday, May 25, 2017

(An Excerpt From The Article)

I already reported how Donald Trump killed more people in the month of March than all of the so-called terror states of the world combined. And Trump only became a more proficient killer in the month of April. “The Airwars monitoring group has compiled reports of 1,280 to 1,744 civilians killed by at least 2,237 bombs and missiles that rained down from U.S. and allied warplanes in April (1,609 on Iraq and 628 on Syria). The heaviest casualties were in and around Old Mosul and West Mosul, where 784 to 1,074 civilians were reported killed, but the area around Tabqa in Syria also suffered heavy civilian casualties.”

See the report here:

The Silent Slaughter Of The US Air War

This is the same Donald Trump who on the campaign trail told Fox & Friends, “Who blew up the World Trade Center? It wasn't the Iraqis, it was Saudi--take a look at Saudi Arabia, open the documents.” Now, instead of opening the documents ON Saudi Arabia, Trump is opening the purse FOR Saudi Arabia.

What is it about Christians and conservatives that they can be so easily duped into supporting war? What is it that makes them not only overlook and excuse wars of aggression but also enthusiastically endorse and champion such wars? Nothing builds the size and scope of government like WAR; nothing creates socialist government like WAR; nothing causes people to accept authoritarian government like WAR; nothing separates families like WAR; nothing leaves children homeless and helpless like WAR; nothing fills the political swamp like WAR; nothing empowers globalists like WAR; nothing destroys a country’s economy like WAR; nothing destroys truth like WAR; and nothing sears the conscience of a people like WAR. Yet, professing Christians and conservatives from Alex Jones to Jerry Falwell, Jr. to Mike Huckabee to Tony Perkins continue to laud Donald Trump as a great “conservative” even as he prepares to take America into yet another senseless, unconstitutional, and perhaps global WAR.





Heartbreaking Video Footage from Syria

End Times News Report
Published on Sep 26, 2017

This moving video footage from Syria is haunting. All patriotic Americans must know what our government is doing in the Middle East. PLEASE SHARE! Crowd funding keeps this channel alive! Please support my work:

Patreon: www.patreon.com/EndTimesNewsR...
PayPal: www.paypal.me/EndTimesNewsReport


Killing For Peace? More Civilian Deaths Now Than Under Obama


Streamed live 5 hours ago

Changing rules of engagement, increased bombing runs, and granting field officers more authority to call in drone strikes has resulted in far more civilian casualties in the ongoing US wars in Afghanistan and the Middle East. Will this acceleration lead to quicker victory? Or is it planting the seeds for yet more expansion of the war?


President Trump To Unleash The CIA Drones

According to recent media reports, President Trump is planning to lift the restrictions on the CIA's use of drones worldwide. Will this new "counterterrorism" strategy create more terrorists than it kills?

Monitoring and assessing civilian casualties from international airstrikes in Iraq, Syria and Libya. Seeking transparency and accountability from belligerents, and advocating on behalf of affected civilians. Archiving open-source reports, and military claims by nations.


The US Gov’t Killed More Civilians This Month Than All Terrorist Attacks in Europe Over the Last 12 Years

In the last 12 years, terrorist attacks in Europe have killed 459 civilians. The U.S. killed at least 472 civilians in Syria, just in the last month.






If You Still Think Trump Is Going To Drain Anything, You're Delusional


America’s Saudi Ally “Cuts Off More Heads” than the Islamic State (ISIL)

By Robert Barsocchini Global Research, October 21, 2014  Washington's Blog 20 October 2014

Newsweek has an  articleout called “When It Comes to Beheadings, ISIS has Nothing on Saudi Arabia”.

The article accurately illustrates that Saudi Arabia is essentially an established version of ISIS; in fact it was established the same way, which is also how Britain established its colonies like the USA, how US/Israel was, and is being, established, how the Afghan Taliban was established in a joint venture with the USA that lasted until 2001, and so on.

Newsweek details how the Saudis behead more people than ISIS (not to mention Saudis are big supporters of ISIS, and, according to leaked 2009 US documents, are the world’s overall biggest supporters of Sunni terror groups such as the formerly US-backed Taliban.)

The Saudi theocracy doesn’t just behead people or crucify people.  They slice your head off in public then crucify you.


…if you were accused of banditry or drug smuggling, like seven Yemenis who were beheaded last year, your corpse will also be crucified.

There are different methods of crucifying the headless … while the headless corpse is mounted, your head is placed in a plastic bag… Your head is then raised above your body and appears to be floating and detached. Your corpse might be kept in that position for up to four days, as a grotesque warning to others of what might happen if they stray outside the law.

The article documents how this is done to people accused of being “sorcerers”, adulterers, people who plead not guilty to crimes (and, the article suggests, are likely innocent), and political dissidents (though Israel has the most political prisoners in the region, and it should also be noted that the USA puts people in cages for the rest of their lives for pretty crimes like shoplifting, while almost no one else does this.)

Noam Chomsky pointed out in a talk this month that Saudi Arabia is the single most radical Islamic state, and makes Iran look moderate by comparison (even though Iran also executes people; the top three countries for executing their own people are always Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the USA.  China’s numbers are likely higher, but unknown.)  And Saudi Arabia, exactly unlike Iran, has been pursuing, and has in fact obtained access to, nuclear weapons, via adealwith nuclear Pakistan, another Islamic fundamentalist US ally and distant runner up to Obama’s USA for  greatest threat to worldpeace at the start of 2014.

Newsweek likewise points out that Iran has “a far more democratic political process than Saudi Arabia.”  Iran, like the USA, China, and others, has a kind of fake democracy wherein candidates must be supported by religious authorities; in China, it is state authorities, and in the US, financial authorities, or oligarchs.

Newsweek then documents how the USA demonizes and criticizes not Saudi Arabia, but rather the more moderate and “democratic” country, Iran.  When US politicians visit Saudi Arabia, as Kerry, Obama, Hillary Clinton, and others regularly do, they “do not publicly condemn the country”; human rights violations are “not mentioned”.

Indeed, though the USA cages more women than any other country in the world, Saudi Arabia is the only country where women are not allowed to operate cars.

Newsweek then points out that this behavior – criticizing a relatively moderate country but not a far more extremist ally – reveals a blatant double-standard by the US.

However, Newsweek then asks “why” the USA has this double-standard, and doesn’t explore the question beyond offering a couple of incidental hints throughout the article.

Perhaps the Newsweek author doesn’t know, thinks the answer is unknowable, or has some other motive for not exploring the topic further, but it should be pursued and the article presents a good opportunity.

Again, the question is, why does the otherwise wonderful USA have this confusing and seemingly nonsensical “double standard”, wherein it criticizes countries (like Iran) that are moderate compared to US ally Saudi Arabia (not to mention scores of others)?

US Relationship with Saudi Arabia

“…starting in the 1930s, the Americans would come to displace the British as the chief ally of the Saudis, especially after the American-aided discovery of vast reserves of oil in Saudi lands. [Murray] Rothbard spelled out the military and crony connections involved:

The Rockefeller interest and other Western Big Oil companies have had intimate ties with the absolute royalties of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia ever since the 1930s. During that decade and World War II, King Ibn Saud of Saudi Arabia granted a monopoly concession on all oil under his domain to the Rockefeller-control-led Aramco, while the $30 million in royalty payments for the concession was paid by the U.S. taxpayer.

The Rockefeller-influenced U.S. Export-Import Bank obligingly paid another $25 million to Ibn Saud to construct a pleasure railroad from his main palace, and President Roosevelt made a secret appropriation out of war funds of $165 million to Aramco for pipeline construction across Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, the U.S. Army was obligingly assigned to build an airfield and military base at Dhahran, near the Aramco Oilfields, after which the multi-million dollar base was turned over, gratis, to Ibn Saud.”

(Dan Sanchez)

In the 1940s, US planners confirmed that the Middle East, particularly Saudi Arabia, contained the greatest material prizes in world history, and set about ensuring that the US could control these resources (just as the US had previously worked to control the formerly most important resource, cotton, in order to bring Britain “to its knees”.  Britain then was holding profitable colonies and enticing lands that ambitious US slave-owning empire-builders were drooling over.)

In the 1950s, Dwight Eisenhower asked his staff, privately, the question asked again decades later, publicly, by Bush Jr.: Why do people in the Middle East seem to hate us?  His staff investigated and determined that it was because the USA prevented democracy and supported repressive regimes in the Middle East so the US could control the region’s energy resources, and that the US should continue doing that.

The cozy gift-based US relationship with Saudi Arabia continues up to today, under Obama, who brown-noses the Saudis by, for example, sending them the biggest shipment of lethal weapons in US history, which Obama did in 2013.  The shipment included internationally banned cluster bombs, one of the personal favorite toys of Obama, as well as the Boston Bombers.

Professor Chalmers Johnson concludes from his extensive research that if Saudi Arabia were to become too upset with the USA, stopped dealing its oil in dollars and switched to some other currency (as did Saddam prior to the US invasion, after which the US switched Iraq back to dollars), then the entire US empire would collapse.

So, quite clearly, the USA refrains from criticizing Saudi Arabia because it is a cornerstone of the extremely profitable (for people like the Rockefellers and Bushes) US empire, but that is only one reason.







Trump's Reckless Unilateral Actions Risk Millions of Lives!

There needs to be diplomacy not casino brinksmanship


Is North Korea An 'Imminent Threat'?

Ron Paul

- New hope for foreign policy -


US Practices 'Taking Out' Kim Jong-Un -- What Will Be The Consequences?


Streamed live on Mar 22, 2017

North Korea continues testing missiles as the United States and South Korea conduct military exercises to practice attacking North Korea. Is North Korea about to launch an attack? Is it capable of being an existential threat to the US? Or is it possible that the threat is only made worse by continued US meddling in the dispute?


Uploaded on Nov 7, 2007

Presidential candidate Ron Paul proposes major changes to U.S. foreign policy. We caught up with him in Iowa


Streamed live on Mar 14, 2017

The US is sending special forces, SEAL Team 6, drones, B-52s, etc to South Korea. Military exercises will include practicing killing the North Korean leadership. Will such exercises provoke a North Korean response? What happens next? What about the Chinese?


What's Really Happening In North Korea

Eric Margolis: Tensions on the Korean Peninsula


What You Need To Know About North Korea and Trump?


Published on Mar 9, 2017

In this video investigative journalists, Luke Rudkowski and James Corbett of the Corbett Report discuss the disastrous geopolitical situation with Kim Jong-un of North Korea. We go over the position of China, Russia, and the U.S in this situation. As missile defense systems are being set up in South Korea which is causing a conflict between these world powers.

For more from James Corbett check out www.youtube.com/channel/UC7Tv...

Visit our MAIN SITE for more breaking news wearechange.org/


US provoked North Korea to break the nuke agreement - Putin

Published on Dec 14, 2017

Russian President Vladimir Putin holds his annual end-of-year press conference, where he discusses a range of domestic and foreign policy issues.

Published on Apr 5, 2013

The Story of the Week: As the rhetoric between Pyongyang and Seoul escalates, The Agenda looks at whether or not tensions on the Korean peninsula could spill into war. Syndicated columnist Eric Margolis joins Steve Paikin for his perspective.


CrossTalk on North Korea:

The U.S. and North Korea continue their war of words, while cooler minds press for diplomacy and negotiations. How much of a threat is North Korea to the global order? And why is the United States threatening force to resolve this conflict? CrossTalking with Sourabh Gupta, Brian Becker, and Sung-Yoon Lee. FACEBOOK: Like CrossTalk on Facebook www.facebook.com/crosstalkrules/ 

Published on Apr 11, 2017

In this video, we go over all the latest breaking news surrounding North Korea and the inevitable action that the U.S and Donald Trump will take. China and Russia are also involved in this international scenario and we give you break down and what previously happened between these global forces.

What's Really Happening In North Korea

Visit our MAIN SITE for more breaking news http://wearechange.org/




Foal Eagle


Foal Eagle is a combined Field Training Exercise (FTX) conducted annually by the Republic of Korea Armed Forces and the United States Armed Forces under the auspices of the Combined Forces Command. It is one of the largest military exercises conducted annually in the world. While defensive in nature and conducted primarily as a rear area security and stability training exercise, Foal Eagle has been a source of friction with the government of Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) and domestic ROK critics.


Provocative U.S. Military Drills: the Source of Manufactured N.K. Crisis

(An Exceprt From Article Below)

"Imagine if North Korea decided to conduct massive “live fire” military drills, accompanied by a Chinese naval flotilla, just three miles off the coast of California. And, let’s say, they decided to send formations of strategic high-altitude aircraft loaded with nuclear bombs to fly along the Canada and Mexico borders while tens of thousands of combat troops accompanied by hundreds of tanks and armored vehicles rehearsed a “shock and awe” type blitz onto US territory where they would immediately crush the defending army, level cities and critical civilian infrastructure, and topple the regime in Washington." -- Mike Whitney 



S. Korea, U.S. launch Key Resolve military drills

South Korea - U.S. kick off Ulchi Freedom Guardian exercise


Foal Eagle


South-Korea and the U.S. kicked off their annual Key Resolve military drills today... complementing the Foal Eagle exercises that began two weeks ago. Amid perhaps the highest inter-Korean tensions in recent years,... the joint drills feature some of the most advanced U.S. military aircraft and weaponry. Our Kim Jung-soo has the details. With tensions running high amid North Korea's latest missile tests, South Korea's Defense Ministry has announced the start of this year's Key Resolve exercises. The drills started Monday and will continue for approximately two weeks until March 24th in tandem with the Foal Eagle drills that began on March 1st and run through April 30th. The drills complement one another -- the Key Resolve drills are command-post exercises that utilize computer simulations of possible North Korean provocations, while the Foal Eagle drills consist solely of field-training exercises. Seoul's Joint Chiefs of Staff have said that a combined 300-thousand troops would be involved in this year's Key Resolve and Foal Eagle exercises -- 290-thousand from South Korea and 10-thousand from the U.S. Military officials have also said that this year's exercises would be conducted with the assumption that the THAAD missile defense system had already been installed on the Korean peninsula. They've also said a variety of other U.S. strategic weaponry would be deployed, including the nuclear-power aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson, which is expected to arrive in Busan on Wednesday, and a special squadron of F-35B stealth fighters from U.S. Forces Japan that are expected to join the exercises sometime this week. It has also been reported that starting sometime next month... the South Korean and U.S. Navy and Marines will conduct large-scale landing operations involving the American amphibious assault ship USS Bonhomme Richard. On a separate note, Seoul's defense ministry also said Monday that the annual Soaring Eagle exercises -- which are conducted solely by the South Korean Air Force to test combat readiness -- had begun on March 10th and will continue through this Friday with the participation of over 50 military aircraft. Kim Jung-soo, Arirang News.

We start this morning with the annual military exercises that begin today,... South Korea and the United States are holding their Ulchi Freedom Guardian drill,... amid escalating tension on the Korean Peninsula after Pyongyang's launch of two ICBMs... and its threats to strike the U.S. territory of Guam. North Korea, once again, has been vocal in its objections, warning Seoul and Washington that the exercises could lead to a catastrophe. Ji Myung-kil starts us off. The Ulchi Freedom Guardian exercise which will run from August 21st to the end of this month... traces its roots to the joint South Korea-U.S. command post exercises back in the 1950s. Tens of thousands of South Korean and U.S. troops will participate in the drill... to help evaluate and improve combined military procedures which are critical to the defense of the Korean peninsula. 2017 UFG to be similar in size to last year's} This year's drill, much of it computer-simulated, will be similar in size to that of last year's... but it is not known whether the U.S. will be sending strategic assets. Admiral Harry Harris... the commander of the U.S. Pacific Command is currently visiting South Korea to inspect the joint exercise. N. Korea fired submarine-launched ballistic missile during 2016 UFG} North Korea, meanwhile, has long denounced the drills, seeing them as a rehearsal for an invasion. During last year's Ulchi Freedom Guardian,... Pyongyang test-fired a submarine-launched ballistic missile followed by a fifth nuclear test a few weeks later. N. Korea says Seoul and Washington 'adding fuel to fire'} On Sunday the North warned that Seoul and Washington are "adding fuel to the fire" and driving the situation on the divided peninsula into a "catastrophe." Tensions escalated between N. Korea and U.S. in recent weeks } Tensions between North Korea and the U.S. have risen in recent weeks... as their respective leaders' exchanged harsh rhetoric. Pyongyang had threatened to fire four ballistic missiles near waters off the U.S. territory of Guam... but backed off its threat last week while key U.S. officials played down fears that war with the North was imminent.

Foal Eagle is a combined Field Training Exercise (FTX) conducted annually by the Republic of Korea Armed Forces and the United States Armed Forces under the auspices of the Combined Forces Command. It is one of the largest military exercises conducted annually in the world. While defensive in nature and conducted primarily as a rear area security and stability training exercise, Foal Eagle has been a source of friction with the government of Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) and domestic ROK critics.

In the US we constantly hear about North Korea‘s missile attempts, their development of weapons which could hit the United States…It would seem as if the US has a lot of reason to fear the tiny country, but we don’t hear really why do they fear us?”


etween 1950 and 1953 the United States carpet bombed North Korea, they bombed it back into the stone age 4 to 5 MILLION Koreans died according to the Encyclopedia Britannica. The main complaint of American pilots in December 1950 that was two years before the war ended, was that there was nothing left to bomb in North Korea because not one structure taller than one story was still standing by 1951, and yet they bombed for another two years. So when US government now simulates the aerial destruction of North Korea as it does every year with war exercises, some of which are going on right now, that’s not a ‘war game’ for the North Koreans, that’s not a game, that’s not funny.
They’ve been through there, they’ve had their country destroyed. And so they’re demanding the US suspend the war games simulating the destruction of North Korea. And the North Koreans have said over and over again : if you do that, we will suspend missile tests, and nuclear weapon tests to which Obama said NO and Trump a month ago said NO.  So yes, there is a basis to have a settlement for these issues.

-- Brian Becker --


MSM and Alt Media (Like Infowars) ignore the outcry of the people in the region who rightly view the drills as Provocative. Infowars produced 65+ videos on Jade Helm15 creating internet hysteria over one US military drill in Texas and a few other states, yet Alex Jones/Infowars have produced ZERO video reports on drills: UFG, FOAL EAGLE, and KEY RESOLVE all of which could start WWIII!

If the American people don't wakeup to how MSM and Alt Media are being used to generate a consensus for WAR/Nuclear WAR with Norht Korea/China, it could mean the death of millions if not most of all life on earth.

Peace activists protest against joint US/SKor military exercises

North Korea is ready to strike unless 'US starts acting sensibly'

South Koreans Protest against Ongoing US South Korea Joint Military Exercise

(Korean) Yu Young-jae, leader of South Korean peace activist group: "South Korea and the US are holding the Ulchi Freedom Guardian (UFG) war exercise. South Korea and the US are claiming that this is a defensive exercise, but it is clearly an attacking exercise when you look at its character and size. We strongly insist they stop the exercise since this exercise seriously threatens peace in the Korean peninsula."

The activists said they too believed the exercise's real purpose is to prepare for an attack. "We strongly insist they stop the exercise since this exercise seriously threatens peace in the Korean peninsula," said Yu Young-jae, one of the peace group's leaders. "The projected war manoeuvres under the spurious signboard of 'defence' are belligerent and undisguised (North Korea)-targeted war exercises," Pyongyang's military said in a statement carried Sunday by the official Korean Central News Agency. North Korea's military will deal a "merciless counterblow" to the US and South Korea, "the severest punishment no one has ever met in the world," it said. The statement did not elaborate on how the North would retaliate. South Korea's Defence Ministry said on Monday it was keeping a close watch on North Korea and had spotted no suspicious activity.

A North Korean diplomat says preparations are complete for a strike on the US territory of Guam if America "does not act sensibly." RT discussed this with author and human rights attorney Eric Sirotkin.


US-South Korea military drills could lead to uncontrollable phase of nuclear war - Pyongyang

Published on Aug 21, 2017

Pyongyang has described the US-South Korea annual military drills, set to kick off on Monday, as the “most explicit expression of hostility,” voicing fears that the war games, known as the Ulchi Freedom Guardian, may “evolve into actual fighting.”

South Koreans held a protest at the Port of Busan on Sunday where South Korean and U.S. military are conducting joint military exercises of Key Resolve and Double Dragon. More than 17,200 soldiers are participating in this year's landing exercise of Double Dragon, the largest ever in history. At the military exercise site, some South Korean residents chanted slogans and waved banners, such as "We Want Peace," "No War," "Stop Military Exercise," and "No Deployment of THAAD system," to express their opposition to the exercise. "The joint military exercise by South Korea and the United States could only make the peninsula fall into the mire of war. We hope the exercise will stop right now. The DPRK people and South Koreans are one nationality, and we should exclude external powers. We should see our nation's own interests. I think South Korea and DPRK can reconcile at any time and we can live together. It is the unification that we need," said a protestor. "Just like what you have seen here, the bombing, smoke of gunpowder and military exercise are going to push the peninsula to war. If we keep doing this, the war will happen at any time. What we want is peace, but not war. Therefore, we must struggle against it unremittingly," said another protester. The United States dispatched its nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis as an addition to supporting the exercise.

Bruce Cumings: North Korea Timed Recent Missile Test to Take Place During Trump-Abe Dinne


- North Korea tested a ballistic missile last month, sparking widespread international condemnation. The test was a violation of a United Nations Security Council resolution. North Korea claimed the test was a successful launch of an intermediate-range missile.

The test came while Trump hosted Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe over the weekend at the Trump-owned Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida. We speak to professor Bruce Cumings about the significance of the timing of North Korea’s action

Is North Korea


"They sure seem crazy when you omit half the story of the US and South Korea doing War Games annually just south of the border."

-- Ryan Dawson --

‘Fire and fury’ wasn’t tough enough - Trump on North Korea

US President Donald Trump said his “fire and fury” warning to North Korea may not have been “tough enough,” shrugging off domestic critics who accused him of reckless rhetoric.

'Patience is over': US, North Korea latest exchange of threats

Published on Jul 10, 2017





"...The objective of the operation is to intensify tensions between North and South thereby justifying the continued US occupation of the peninsula and the permanent division of the country"

-- Mike Whitney --


Why Can’t Wheeler-Dealer Trump Cut a Deal with North Korea?

By Mike Whitney
Global Research, August 26, 2017
CounterPunch 25 August 2017

The United States and South Korea are currently engaged in large-scale, joint-military war games that simulate an invasion of the North, the destruction of the DPRK’s nuclear weapons sites, and a “decapitation operation” to take out the supreme leader, Kim Jong-un. The objective of the operation is to intensify tensions between North and South thereby justifying the continued US occupation of the peninsula and the permanent division of the country.

Imagine if North Korea decided to conduct massive “live fire” military drills, accompanied by a Chinese naval flotilla, just three miles off the coast of California. And, let’s say, they decided to send formations of strategic high-altitude aircraft loaded with nuclear bombs to fly along the Canada and Mexico borders while tens of thousands of combat troops accompanied by hundreds of tanks and armored vehicles rehearsed a “shock and awe” type blitz onto US territory where they would immediately crush the defending army, level cities and critical civilian infrastructure, and topple the regime in Washington.

Do you think the Trump administration would dismiss the North’s provocative war games as merely “defensive maneuvers” or would they see them as a clear and present danger to US national security warranting a prompt and muscular response from the military?

It’s a no brainer, isn’t it? If North Korea treated the US like the US treats North Korea, then Washington would turn everything north of the 38th Parallel into a smoldering wastelands. That much is certain.

But double standards aside, the United States has always treated Korea with contempt and brutality. The ongoing war games are just the latest in a long line of provocations dating back more than a hundred years.








Americans must ask themselves how they would respond if drills like Foal Eagle were being conducted by either the Russians or Chinese on America's borders...And if a quarter million Americans had been killed by either nation in a prior war...And if at present, America had no nuclear weapons to counter its opposition's arsenal of high tech nuclear weapons....How would America respond if, said nations, had done what America has just recently done to Iraq, Libya, and its current attempts against Syria?



All America's Wars Begin with False Flags (and WWIII Will Too)

This D.C. think tank jerk off blatantly admitted all of America's wars have traditionally begun with false flag events, and they know they will need another one to get the war with Iran started that they've been working on for so long.

This video is a few years old now, but it's more relevant today with what's going on in the Middle East than ever. They don't teach you this in school, kids, but whatever happens over there, just realize how absolutely manufactured all of it is.

Link : False Flag Event



'No Trump, no war’

1,000s rally for peace ahead of US president’s visit to South Korea

Published on Nov 5, 2017




The Korean War: A History Part 1
- Bruce Cumings -

Massachusetts School of Law at Andover
Published on Mar 23, 2011

The Korean War: A History Part 2
- Bruce Cumings -

Massachusetts School of Law at Andover
Published on Apr 13, 2011

From the historical origins of the Korean war, to the early disputes between North and South Korea and then on thru to the more recent history of North Korea, from General MacArthur's massive underestimation of the North Korean army, to the north's involvement with China, all the way to the great famine and the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Bruce Cumings, Chairman of the Department of History at the University of Chicago and author of The Korean War: A History, joins Dean Lawrence R. Velvel in part one of this episode of Books of Our Time.

To watch part 2 of the interview head over here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KCBH2...


For Americans, it was a discrete conflict lasting from 1950 to 1953. But for the Asian world the Korean War was a generations-long struggle that still haunts contemporary events. With access to new evidence and secret materials from both here and abroad, including an archive of captured North Korean documents, Bruce Cumings reveals the war as it was actually fought. He describes its origin as a civil war, preordained long before the first shots were fired in June 1950 by lingering fury over Japan’s occupation of Korea from 1910 to 1945. Cumings then shares the neglected history of America’s post–World War II occupation of Korea, reveals untold stories of bloody insurgencies and rebellions, and tells of the United States officially entering the action on the side of the South, exposing as never before the appalling massacres and atrocities committed on all sides.

www.mslaw.edu The origins of the Korean war, the great North Korean famine and MacArthur's massive underestimation of the North Korean Army.

Bruce Cumings, Chairman of the Department of History at the University of Chicago and author of The Korean War: A History, joins Dean Lawrence R. Velvel in part two of this episode of Books of Our Time. Cumings and Velvel discuss the historical origins of the Korean war, from the early disputes between North and South Korea and then on thru to the more recent history of North Korea, from General MacArthur's massive underestimation of the North Korean army, to the north's involvement with China, all the way to the great famine, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the advent of modern democracy in South Korea



Scott Horton speech on North Korea and Iran

Scott Horton
Published on Jun 11, 2013

San Angelo, Texas April 24, 2013.
Radio host Scott Horton talks to the Young Americans for Liberty at Angelo State University in San Angelo, Texas, April 24, 2013 on American policy toward North Korea and Iran and answers questions about US support for Chechen rebels and the wars Libya, Mali, Afghanistan and Syria






Exploding the Korean War Lies

Published on Jun 25,2015

On the 65th anniversary of the beginning of the Korean War James is joined by James Perloff of jamesperloff.com to discuss his in-depth article, "The Korean War: Another Conflict that Served the Illuminati Agenda." From deals with the Soviets to protection for the Chinese to pulled punches and "missed" opportunities, we examine how the pretext for the war was created, why it was thrown, and who was behind it.

LINKS : The United Nations ,  C.F.R.

The Following Are Underreported Essential Points To The Conflict:

  • North Korea has been under nuclear threat since the Korean War. Our war plans for decades called for using nuclear weapons very early in a new war. That’s one reason there hasn’t been a new war , but every general prepares for the worse case. And so North Korea has essentially spent about fifty or sixty years developing the only deterrent to nuclear weapons that they possibly can, until they got their own nuclear weapons in the last two years. [Lawrence Velvel] Do you think most Americans know that we had nuclear weapons in South Korea as early as, well in 1958 or so? [B.C.] That’s something that is very mystified. I’ve tried to bring it out time and time again in articles, but I went to the Eisenhower library and looked at the documents on it. We put ‘Honest John’ missiles - nuclear tipped - into South Korea in 1958. The decision was made in 1957 by John Foster Dulles. And you look at the National Security Council’s records, they know they’re violating a cardinal principle of the armistice that ended the Korean War : which is not to introduce new and different quality weapons. It’s said, ’Well you know they’re always doing that, they’re bringing in new MIGs and everything, so we can do this. But I mean to go from conventional weapons to nuclear weapons essentially obliterated that article of the [Armistice]. [L.V.] Yeah that’s taken as these days, that is the line…that is the line. [B.C.] They were there in the hundreds in the 70’s and 80’s. [L.V.] In the hundreds?! [B.C.] Yeah hundreds, because they started with bringing in tactical nuclear weapons like nuclear mines that you could fit in a backpack. Soldier in a jeep goes up to the DMZ and puts one down…In the 80’s a lot of this came out because our own military didn’t like it. I heard a retired general give a lecture at Carnegie Endowment where he said, ‘we done things like put a nuclear weapon on a helicopter., and then it goes up near the DMZ, and what if it is, you know, somehow captured by the North Koreans or gets off course.’ He said, “We relied way too much on a nuclear deterrent to the point the South Korean army doesn’t think it has to fight in a new war because we are going to wipeout the North Koreans.” -- Bruce Cuming & Lawrence Velvel

  • “…The United States in the region has a central objective that does not concern Kim Jong-un or his nuclear weapons. Rather, it is driven by the perennial necessity to increase forces in the region for the purposes of maintaining a balance of military force (Asian Pivot) and ultimately trying to contain the rise of the People’s Republic of China (PRC).” -- Federico Pieraccini

  • “…Think about this, if they [The C.I.A] thought that Kin Jong Un was getting ready to nuke American citizens, they could assassinate this guy within 24 hours. They could knock him off like that, his government would crumble. The problem with that though, is that the C.I.A. would not have control of the process of the rebuilding of the North Korean government. What they want is total control. What they are doing is trying to arrange a full scale military operation like what we did in Iraq. That way we’d get in, we’d control the infrastructure, we’d control the setting up of the new government and we’d install a puppet. An entire puppet government, that’s what we did in Iran, and Afghanistan. And this includes controlling the policies of the new government in a way that favors the United States, and includes new U.S. military outposts being setup in North Korea. Of course that’s something that China and Russia are not going to sit by and just allow to happen….There are mutually beneficially things that can be determined here [between US and NK] , but unless the two sides sit down and talk, nothing is going to happen, and that is the actual goal of the C.I.A. They don‘t want there to be negotiations. They want what they want. The globalists do not want compromise, they are after control. And they are not going to get control as long as Kim is in power; he‘s too independent. The Kim dynasty , they don‘t go along with what the C.I.A. tells them to do…And that is why I believe that there is not going to be a Donald Trump negotiation to resolve this conflict.

    I think that the deep state is going to push and push and push; they will create a false flag attack if necessary, something will happen to make it look like we absolutely have to go to war with North Korea…This is not a simple issue. This is certainly not a story of just some crazy little dictator who is off his rocker and he wants to control the world; he wants to develop nuclear weapons and destroy everyone. This is not Dr Evil, this is a puny little guy who was thrust into a position well before he was ready for it, who is scared to death, doesn’t know what to do. But all he knows is the C.I.A. is going to murder him if he gives them the chance. ” -- Jake Morphonios

  • “The US ‘War Economy’. One can also argue there are very powerful vested interests in the US corporate structure who have, and will continue to benefit from a heated arms build-up, and will certainly use the North Korea threat as a justification to push forward spending, especially in light of Washington’s new found austerity culture ushered in through recent budget sequestrations. America’s new pivot towards Asia provides the catch-all policy net, while the two-way propaganda duel between the two countries provides the fear needed to justify a new military build up in the region.”

    “By now, we should all have learned the lesson: mainstream media, not politics, is the true engine of war.” -- Patrick Henningsen

  • In response to the recent U.N. Security Council vote, North Korea’s government stated that it would not negotiate over its nuclear or missile programs. The assumption that seems to be behind Trump administration policy is that they can be cajoled into doing this, and furthermore that they can be pressured into making concessions on these issues before talks begin. The administration is laboring under the delusion that it is still possible to persuade North Korea to give up on things that its government considers essential to its security. If anything, the heightened tensions and increased pressure in recent months have just confirmed their leadership in the belief that they need their nuclear weapons and missiles more than ever. Needless to say, talking about raining down “fire and fury” on them isn’t going to make them more likely to compromise on this point.

    One of the more common hawkish refrains about North Korea is that “diplomacy has been tried and it failed,” but this ignores that North Korea acquired nuclear weapons in response to some of the same pressure tactics that hawks wanted to use in lieu of the nuclear deal with Iran. There was a diplomatic agreement in place that had succeeded in limiting North Korea’s nuclear program, but the Bush administration wasn’t satisfied with it. They blew up the agreement, and North Korea withdrew from the NPT and tested its first nuclear weapon soon thereafter. North Korea is a cautionary tale about what happens when hard-liners in Washington prefer to scrap an imperfect but working nonproliferation agreement in favor of pursuing the fantasy of forcing the other side’s total capitulation. -- Daniel Larison

  • “Talk of war is dangerous and irresponsible. It would have catastrophic consequences for Northeast Asia and the world. Military action could slow the North’s program, but not eliminate it. Threats of war, moreover, only make the North redouble efforts to hold the United States at risk. And they greatly exacerbate the greatest risk of all: an inadvertent war on the Korean peninsula with the potential for hundreds of thousands of deaths, including thousands of American citizens. Unfortunately, some American leaders believe that if there is a war, keeping it on the Korean peninsula will keep us safe. I maintain that a nuclear war anywhere will have catastrophic consequences for America.” -- Siegfried S. Hecker

  • "The reason that George Bush was so intent on screwing up the [94Carter/Clinton] deal. Was because when he took power, the Japanese and South Koreans were basically already ignoring the Americans and had their own North Korea policy at that point. And really wanted to push The Sunshine policy, they called it, toward reunification in slow motion, but still toward peace, toward understanding… families aloud to visit back and forth across the border…Trains that run back and forth so that you could have multinational businesses on both sides of the border…begin to forge these relationships, and thought-out the crisis. And to the Bush regime that was absolutely intolerable. That our Japanese and South Korean satellites would think that they can have their own foreign policy on North Korea issues. And that is why they really moved to quash it…

    And that goes to show that the American government’s interest in Korea is not peace. The American government’s interest in Korea is to keep them divided, because the Pacific is an American lake. And a big part of the reason that the Japanese rely on us, is because they’ve got that North Korean problem to deal with etc. etc…We keep them divided, we keep them conquered, we keep them our satellites. If we can tell the Japanese, ‘you shut up we’ll take care of it’ then we can keep them quiet. If we can’t credibly say that we are in charge of the situation, then they’re going to go ahead and make their own policy. So the American policy is that we prefer a divided Korea that could explode into nuclear warfare, rather than sunshine and peace, and globetrotters and gymnastics and symphony orchestras, and a future that anyone would want to look forward to. So that’s where your government is coming from on this. They are evil. And they are refusing to solve a problem that is really pretty simple to solve…At least for a beginning." -- Scott Horton
  • The North Koreans want peace. They want a formal end to the war and they want guarantees that the United States won’t preemptively attack them. Is that too much to ask?

    But the United States won’t sign a treaty with the North because it is not in its interests to do so. Washington would prefer for things to stay just the way they are today. In fact, Hillary Clinton said as much in a speech she made to Goldman Sachs in 2013. Here’s an excerpt:

    CLINTON: “We don’t want a unified Korean peninsula, because if there were one South Korea would be dominant for the obvious economic and political reasons.-We [also] don’t want the North Koreans to cause more trouble than the system can absorb. So we’ve got a pretty good thing going with the previous North Korean leaders [Kim Il-sung and Kim Jung-il]. And then along comes the new young leader [Kim Jung-un], and he proceeds to insult the Chinese. He refuses to accept delegations coming from them…..So the new [Chinese] leadership basically calls him [Kim Jung-un] on the carpet. …Cut it out. Just stop it. Who do you think you are? You are dependent on us [the Chinese], and you know it. (WikiLeaks)

    There it is in black and white. The US does not want a unified Korea. (“for obvious economic and political reasons.”) The US wants to keep the country split up so it can keep the North isolated and underdeveloped, maintain the South’s colonial dependence on the US, and perpetuate the occupation. That’s what Washington wants. The goal is not security, but power, greed and geopolitical positioning.

    From Washington’s point of view, the status quo is just dandy which is why there is no incentive to end the war, sign a treaty, wind down the occupation, or provide security guarantees for the North. As Hillary cheerily opines, “We’ve got a pretty good thing going on.” -- Mike Whitney 



---------->> AN ABSOLUTE MUST WATCH VIDEO!...PLEASE SHARE! <<----------

My Response to Viewers Who Support War with North Korea 


---------->> AN ABSOLUTE MUST WATCH VIDEO!...PLEASE SHARE! <<----------

Published on Mar 15, 2017

The Deep State is trying to manufacture support for a war with North Korea. The war drums are beginning to sound. If you fell for the anti-Iraq war propaganda under George W. Bush - don't make the same mistake again!

Would You Like to Support My Work?

Patreon: http://bit.ly/2i1cFVv
PayPal: http://www.paypal.me/EndTimesNewsReport


These 12 Hellholes Are Examples Of What The Rest Of America Will Look Like Soon

Economy Destroyed By Design!

Food Crisis





-- RON PAUL --

"[NORTH KOREA DILEMMA] The moral responsibility and political responsibility are the people over there in that region...so we still argue the case that for the American system and for our national security and for our financial reasons, it is in our best interest to mind our own business; and I'll stick to my argument that it's time to BRING OUR TROOPS HOME!"

A Foreign Policy of Freedom

A Foreign Policy of Freedom: Peace, Commerce, and Honest Friendship is a 2007 compilation of floor speeches to the U.S. House of Representatives by Congressman Ron Paul.[1][2] They covered a 30-year period and addressed foreign policy. The book was published as an accompaniment to his campaign for the presidency of the United States in the 2008 election. The first edition includes a foreword by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. It is published by the Foundation for Rational Economics and Education of Lake Jackson, Texas.


Swords into Plowshares

Twelve-term US Congressman and three-time presidential candidate Ron Paul reveals an intensely personal side as he reflects on growing up during World War II. The book also provides a powerful critique of the corruption and corrosion produced by a 20th century full of war and killing. Ever the optimist, however, Paul leaves behind the ashes of a 20th century of war to finish with a stirring, liberating view of the future we may choose if we turn from war and violence. This is the book we’ve all been waiting for, and it has finally arrived!




[US estimates of war in Korea, made a decade ago, suggest America would incur 250,000 casualties in a war that would cost one million Korean deaths]

by Eric Margolis

March 18, 2017

Panmunjom, the ‘peace village’ on the incredibly tense demilitarized zone (aka DMZ) between North and South Korea, is one of the weirdest places I’ve ever visited. Tough North Korean soldiers lurk about, watched by equally tough South Korean troops in one-way sunglasses and an aggressive judo ‘warrior’ stance.

When I was filming at Panmunjom, we were warned to beware of North Koreans who could at any moment rush into the main conference room and drag us into North Korea.

It was into this crazy house that the new, jet-lagged US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was transported from turbulent Washington. After a quick look at the DMZ, Tillerson announced `no more Mr. Nice Guy.’ The US had run out of `strategic patience’ with North Korea and will go to war to end North Korea’s ‘threat’ to the US, he warned.

Tillerson, formerly CEO of EXXON, is well-versed in world affairs but the Korean peninsula’s complexities could be too much for him to quickly absorb. Immediately threatening war is no way to begin a diplomatic mission. But Tillerson was obviously reading from a script written by his boss, Donald Trump, whose knowledge of North Asian affairs makes Tillerson look like a Confucian scholar.

Welcome to Trump’s credo: tweet loudly and walk with a big stick.

What would war between the US and North Korea mean? A very grim scenario if it occurs.

The US has nearly 80,000 military personnel in South Korea and Japan, as well as more war-fighting units in Guam, which the US conquered from Spain in 1898. The US 7th Fleet patrols the region, armed with tactical nuclear weapons. US nukes are also based in South Korea and Guam. As we recently saw, US heavy B-1 and B-52 bombers can fly from North America to Korea.

South Korea has a formidable, 600,000-man army equipped with state of the art weapons. I’ve been up on the DMZ with the 2nd ROK division. As an old soldier, I was very impressed by their skill and warlike spirit.

North Korea’s one million-man armed force is large, but obsolescent. Its great strength in heavy artillery partly compensates for its totally obsolete, 1960’s vintage air force. Key combat elements of the DPRK army are dug deep into the rocky hills just north of the DMZ, with thousands of heavy North Korean guns facing south. In the event of war, the North claims it will destroy South Korea’s capitol, Seoul, that is only 30km away and has 20 million residents.

US estimates of war in Korea, made a decade ago, suggest America would incur 250,000 casualties in a war that would cost one million Korean deaths. That’s why the US has shied away from direct attack on North Korea. Unlike Iraqis, Syrians, Libyans and Somalis, North Koreans know how to fight back and are amply armed for a defensive war.

The US would certainly be tempted to use tactical nuclear weapons against North Korean troops and guns deeply dug into the mountainous terrain. Without them, air power, America’s usual trump card, would lose much of its destructive potential. No doubt, all North Korea would be ravaged by US air power, as it was during the 1950’s Korean War. South Korea plans massive air, missile and commando attacks on North Korean military HQ and against leader Kim Jung-un’s hideaway.

US war plans call for amphibious landings along North Korea’s long, vulnerable coastline. This threat forces the North to deploy large numbers of regular army and militia troops on both coasts.

North Korea’s air force and little navy would be vaporized on the first day of hostilities. But it is likely that the DPRK would be able to fire a score or more of medium-ranged missiles at Japan. If the war goes nuclear, Japan looks almost certain to suffer nuclear attack, along with Guam. Tokyo and Osaka are prime targets.

North Korean forces might be able to push south to Seoul, but likely no further in the face of fierce attacks by US and South Korean air power operating from bases further south. The North’s powerful commando force of some 100,000 troops would attack key South Korean targets, including its vital air bases shared with the US. Such raids would be highly disruptive but not decisive unless the DPRK used chemical and/or biological weapons to shut down South Korea’s air bases and its ports at Busan and Inchon.

The US and South Korea could certainly win such a war but it would be very bloody and expensive. There would be the threat of Chinese military intervention if it appeared the US was about to occupy North Korea. Russia is right next door.

Secretary Tillerson, please leave war threats to the generals and start practicing some active diplomacy with the North. If ever a war was not needed, it’s here.



  • Mass Movement in South Korea against THAAD Missile Deployment
    Riot Cops Exert Excessive Use of Force

[The Defense Ministry reportedly told the South Korean media that it plans to transport the remainder of the THAAD components into the deployment site by the end of this year.]



  • How U.S. Missile “Defense” Destabilizes the World 



  • Directed against China: New Site for U.S. THAAD Missile Deployment in South Korea 



  • The South Korea Protest Movement against the THAAD Missile System. “Seongju is Korea and Korea is Seongju” 




This is not Syria: Tens of millions could die in Korean War II

By World Tribune on April 13, 2017

By Donald Kirk 

POHANG – An array of heavy-duty, sophisticated gear spread over the beaches here shows the incredible military might of the U.S. and South Korea. Far offshore, way beyond the horizon, the aircraft carrier Carl Vinson leads a "strike force" of warships.

Watching the display of U.S. strength on the beach in a wargame called Pacific Reach, one realizes how easy it would be to decimate the North Koreans.
A U.S. Marine stands guard during the U.S.-South Korea joint Exercise Operation Pacific Reach in Pohang, South Korea, on April 11. / Ahn Young-joon / AP

The purpose of this particular exercise is logistics ? to show the speed and agility with which these forces can unload hundreds of thousands of tons of supplies anywhere on shore ? perfect for an attack on the North. The South Koreans are in it too ? infinitely stronger than when the North Koreans rolled over them in the summer of 1950.

None of this drama, however, appears to have had any impact on Kim Jong-Un as he intensifies his own scare campaign against the U.S. and South Korea. If the U.S. wants to consider a preemptive strike against his nuclear and missile facilities, his propaganda machine lets it be known, he’ll hit the U.S. first with a nuclear warhead.

It’s hard to take such rhetoric seriously. Everyone knows it’s for dramatic effect, whether to impress his own people or foreigners dumb enough to think North Korea’s nuclear program is really for "defense." The point, however, is: might President Trump order a pre-emptive strike as he did against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s murderous military machine?

Advocates of military force, impressed by what’s plain to see about U.S. military power, had better not get their hopes up.

Sure, Trump could order an air strike on Assad as punishment for his use of deadly chemical weapons on innocent civilians in a rebel-held town.

Similarly, a volley of cruise missiles, supplemented by air strikes, could take out the sites from which Kim Jong-Un loves to order "tests" of his own missiles, including the long-range model with which he threatens the U.S. More strikes might remove North Korea’s nuclear complex at Yongbyon from the map.

And then what? North Korea is not Syria. The Middle East is not the Korean Peninsula.

Thousands of American troops are not exposed to Assad’s war machine. Nor are millions of people living and working in peace across a line 60 or so kilometers from Damascus.

No, the fact that the U.S. has enough sheer strength to wage war in Northeast Asia does not mean that option should be on the table. The results of headstrong action, of attacking on gut instinct, as some think Trump might do, would be unpredictable, to say the least.

The risks far outweigh the rewards. There’s no telling exactly how North Korea would respond, or whether China and Russia would rush to Kim Jong-Un’s aid as they did for his grandfather Kim Il-Sung, in the Korean War. For sure, however, millions would be in the line of fire if the North Koreans deluged the South with artillery blasts and missiles - even if they haven’t figured out how to "deliver" miniaturized nuclear bombs.

When the topic of a retaliatory strike came up during the 1994 nuclear crisis, Bill Clinton, then in the White House, considered bombing North Korea’s nuclear complex. Kim Young-Sam, then South Korea’s president, warned him 10 million Koreans could lose their lives in the ensuing conflict.

At the very least, the U.S needs to consult its Korean ally before giving a moment’s thought to a preemptive strike. Would any South Korean president, liberal or conservative, say, sure, let’s do it, a great "combined" exercise?

That’s not to say a preemptive strike might not bring a quick dividend by stopping the North from launching missiles right away. After that immediate gain, however, holy hell could break out. Nobody knows how many tens of millions might die.

The cruise missile strike in Syria should not serve as an example even if the sight of American and Korean forces playing war games here with a panoply of awesome gear is impressive. No one knows what magic formula or potion will resolve the Korean standoff, but one way not to resolve it is to open Korean War II. Real war is not a war game.




There Is No Military Solution To The North Korea Conundrum

"...the question of war on the Korean peninsula is now “on the table,” as the national security wonks like to say...It should be taken off the table, pronto."


Justin Raimondo Editorial Director, Antiwar.com

5:48 PM 04/14/2017

With North Korea launching ballistic missile tests with disturbing regularity, and US officials openly talking about the possibility of a preemptive strike against the Hermit Kingdom’s nuclear facilities, the question of war on the Korean peninsula is now “on the table,” as the national security wonks like to say.

It should be taken off the table, pronto.

The reason is simple: a military confrontation with North Korean despot Kim Jong-un has a 100% chance of ending in a nuclear conflagration. As retired Col. David Hunt, who served in Korea on the DMZ, told Eric Bolling on Thursday, every war game simulating a war with North Korea has ended in a nuclear conflict. For fifty years, the North Koreans have been preparing for a resumption of hostilities in a war that never formally ended. Positioned in the heights just above the demilitarized zone is a massive array of North Korean artillery pointed at Seoul, the South Korean capital, a city with 3 million inhabitants. Within six minutes, that tremendous firepower would be unleashed, and the casualties would be massive.

Of course the South Koreans are fully aware of this, which is why they would never consent to a US military strike. This is the one factor our talking heads — who blithely debate this “option” as if it were just another foreign policy issue — always leave out. They can’ imagine that the South Koreans might object to the obliteration of their country – or even that they might have a say in the matter.
Sponsored Links by

The reason for the supposedly irrational behavior of the North Koreans isn’t hard to understand. Every year we conduct joint military exercises a few miles from the North Korean border, and this year they simulated a full-scale military assault. Our nuclear-capable B-1B bombers and F-22 stealth fighter jets – the world’s most lethal military aircraft — flew alongside South Korean fighters in a “mock” air raid on North Korean positions. The USS Vinson, an aircraft carrier, the USS Columbus, a nuclear submarine capable of landing special forces and hitting offshore targets, were deployed off the North Korean coast. Twenty-thousand US military personnel joined with over 300,000 South Korean troops to enact a dress rehearsal for a war Pyongyang has been preparing for since the last one ended in a truce.

Now the US is openly talking about ending that truce, with President Trump tweeting that if the Chinese don’t do something about Kim Jon-un the United States will act.

Trump thinks he can get the Chinese to rein in Pyongyang – after all, aren’t they allies? Well, no, they aren’t. The last time Beijing had any influence in Pyongyang was in 1956, when the pro-Beijing faction within the ruling Korean Workers Party acted in concert with a pro-Soviet faction to remove supreme leader Kim Il Sung from power at a meeting of the Central Committee. The attempt failed, and the dissidents were purged and later executed. The latest manifestation of a pro-Beijing faction within the leadership was centered around Kim Jong-un’s late uncle, Jang Song-thaek, Pyongyang’s liaison with Beijing via “free trade zones” set up in coordination with the Chinese. He was charged with treason and recently executed, shot to death with an anti-aircraft gun: his family was also killed.

There is no military solution to the problem of North Korea. Nor is leaving it to the Chinese going to work. There’s just one way to avoid war on the Korean peninsula, and that is by encouraging the process of North-South reconciliation that was begun some 16 years ago with the “Sunshine Policy.” That’s when South Korea’s then President Kim Dae-jung opened up talks with the North, and, in spite of US opposition, his successor traveled to the North, and met with Kim Jong-il: thousands of South Koreans followed suit, crossing over to visit long-lost relatives. Trade increased, but the thaw didn’t last long. Nixed by the Bush administration, and the coming to power in South Korea of right-winger Lee Myung Bak, the sunset of the “Sunshine Policy” was ensured.

Recent political developments in South Korea hold out some hope. The impeachment of President Park Geung-hye, daughter of cold war military dictator Park Chung-hee, means that the liberal opposition will very likely come to power. The leading candidate, Moon Jae-in of the Democratic party, opposes a preemptive strike and has said “The safety of South Korea is as important as that of the United States”: he’d reopen negotiations with Pyongyang.

The Korean people are intensely nationalistic: they resent any sort of foreign interference in their affairs, which is why meddling by Beijing and Washington is widely resented. There is a way out of the Korean conundrum – if only the US will get out of the way.

Justin Raimondo is the founder and editorial director of www.Antiwar.com.



What Would Korean War II Look Like?

Eric Margolis April 15, 2017

If China is not going to solve North Korea, we will.”

So thundered President Donald Trump last week. Unfortunately, neither China nor North Korea appeared intimidated by this presidential bombast or Trump’s Tweets.

What would ‘we will’ actually entail? This clear threat makes us think seriously about what a second Korean War would be like. Memory of the bloody, indecisive first Koran War, 1950-53, which killed close to 3 million people, has faded. Few Americans have any idea how ferocious a conventional second Korean War could be. They are used to seeing Uncle Sam beat up small, nearly defenseless nations like Iraq, Libya or Syria that dare defy the Pax Americana.

The US could literally blow North Korea off the map using tactical nuclear weapons based in Japan, South Korea and at sea with the 7th Fleet. Or delivered by B-52 and B-1 bombers and cruise missiles. But this would cause clouds of lethal radiation and radioactive dust to blanket Japan, South Korea and heavily industrialized northeast China, including the capital, Beijing.

China would be expected to threaten retaliation against the United States, Japan and South Korea to deter a nuclear war in next door Korea. At the same time, if heavily attacked, a fight-to-the-end North Korea may fire off a number of nuclear-armed medium-range missiles at Tokyo, Osaka, Okinawa and South Korea. These missiles are hidden in caves in the mountains on wheeled transporters and hard to identify and knock out.

This is a huge risk. Such a nuclear exchange would expose about a third of the world’s economy to nuclear contamination, not to mention spreading nuclear winter around the globe.

A conventional US attack on North Korea would be far more difficult. The North is a small nation of only 24.8 million. Its air and sea forces are obsolete and ineffective. They would be vaporized on the first day of a war. But North Korea’s million-man army has been training and digging in for decades to resist a US invasion. Pyongyang’s 88,000-man Special Forces are poised for suicide attacks on South Korea’s political and military command and control and to cripple key US and South Korean air bases, notably Osan and Kunsan.

North Korea may use chemical weapons such as VX and Sarin to knock out the US/South Korean and Japanese airbases, military depots, ports and communications hubs. Missile attacks would be launched against US bases in Guam and Okinawa.

Short of using nuclear weapons, the US would be faced with mounting a major invasion of mountainous North Korea, something for which it is today unprepared. It took the US six months to assemble a land force in Saudi Arabia just to attack feeble Iraq. Taking on the tough North Korean army and militia in their mountain redoubts will prove a daunting challenge.

US analysts have in the past estimated a US invasion of North Korea would cost some 250,000 American casualties and at least $10 billion, though I believe such a war would cost four times that much today. The Army, Air Force and Marines would have to mobilize reserves to wage a war in Korea. Already overstretched US forces would have to be withdrawn from Europe and the Mideast. Military conscription might have to be re-introduced.

US war planners believe that an attempt to assassinate or isolate North Korean leader Kim Jung-un – known in the military as ‘decapitation’- would cause the North Korean armed forces to scatter and give up. I don’t think so.

My visits to South and North Korea have shown me that soldiers of both nations are amazingly tough, patriotic and ready to fight. I’ve also been under the Demilitarized Zone in some of the warren of secret tunnels built by North Korea under South Korean fortifications. Hundreds of North Korean long-range 170mm guns and rocket batteries are buried into the hills facing the DMZ, all within range of the northern half of South Korea’s capital, Seoul.

North Korea is unlikely to be a pushover in a war. Even after US/South Korean forces occupy Pyongyang, the North has prepared for a long guerilla war in the mountains that could last for decades. They have been practicing for 30 years. Chaos in North Korea will invite Chinese military intervention, but not necessarily to the advantage of the US and its allies.

Is Commander-in-Chief Trump, who somehow managed to avoid military service during the Vietnam War, really ready to launch a big war in Asia? Most Americans still can’t locate Korea on a map. Will Congress tax every American taxpayer $20,000 to pay for a new Korean war? Will Russia sit by quietly while the US blows apart North Korea? Does anyone in the White House know that North Korea borders on Russia and is less than 200km from the key Russian port of Vladivostok?

All this craziness would be ended if the US signed a peace treaty with North Korea ending the first Korean War and opened up diplomatic and commercial relations. No need for war or missile threats. North Korea is a horrid, brutal regime. But so is Egypt, whose tin pot dictator was wined and dined by Trump last week.

But pounding the rostrum with your shoe is always much more fun than boring peace talks.








Rex Tillerson: 'Steps Are Underway' To Remove Assad

Escalation: US Media Calls For War With Russia


The Truth About Trump's Air Strike on Syria


Published on Apr 7, 2017

Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show


Published on Apr 7, 2017

Alex Jones breaks down how the media is spinning with no evidence that Russia carried out the chemical weapons attack.

Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show


Published on Apr 7, 2017

Half of you will hate me whatever I say.

Facebook @ www.facebook.com/paul.j.watso...
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

Link : C.F.R.




Syria Attacked : Globalists Urge POTUS to carryout failed Regime Change of 2013

Many more videos here :WE WHO DARE SAY NO TO WAR!


 Some Background :


Who Is Really Behind the Syrian War?



Published on Aug 30, 2013

SHOW NOTES AND MP3: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=7893

Given that the pretext for attacking Syria is falling apart before the public's eyes [...at least it was back in 2013], why is the US preparing to wage war on that country? Who benefits from the ongoing destabilization of Assad's government? What will the Middle East look like if the Sunnis take over Syria? What is Israel's role in this? What do Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia have to gain from a war in Syria? And what does Bandar Bush have to do with all of this? Join us today on The Corbett Report as we discuss these and other pressing issues as the world stands on the brink of yet another US-led Middle Eastern military adventure.





Why The NWO Hates Syria


Published on Dec 17, 2012

8 reasons why the NWO hates Syria
No Rothschild central bank, NO IMF debt, No Genetically modified food, Oil and pipelines, Anti-secret societies, Anti-Zionism, Secularism, Nationalism.



The Federal Reserve

International Monetary Fund



Full Spectrum Dominance

Skull and Bones, The Order at Yale Revealed

 Iran-Iraq Syria Pipeline (The Below Link)


Greater Israel Plan (The Below Link)




Media Lies While Syrians Die: Media Disinformation and the Syrian War


Published on Dec 21, 2013

TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: http://ur1.ca/g8f8q

Months after the events took place, Pulitzer prize winning journalists and others are finally reporting about the lies and manipulations of the US government regarding the recent chemical weapons attack in Syria. Far from shining a light on the true situation in the country, however, these reports continue to avoid the underlying causes and explanations for what is happening in Syria, and the forces that are behind it. This is the GRTV Backgrounder on Global Research TV.


Corporate Media -The Invisible Government

The War You Don't See

The Media Manipulators




President Donald Trump Bombs Syria

Published on Apr 6, 2017

On the 100th anniversary of the United States entry into World War I, President Donald Trump targeted a Syrian air base, launching over 50 Tomahawk cruise missiles and destroying the facility. United States Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has also alluded to an international coalition forcing the ouster of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. After campaigning on a foreign policy without entangling foreign wars and nation-building, many Trump supporters feel betrayed and angry.



Evidence Mounts Syrian WMD Attack Was False Flag

Published on Apr 6, 2017

The news has done nothing but push the total war agenda after the Syrian chemical attack, but who really stands to gain from the overthrow of the Assad regime in Syria.

LINK : False Flag Event





"The Neo-Cons want America to go to War"

[S.P.] "The key issue is the public doesn't know we've got 500 Marines being put into Syria in a war that can't be won, in a battle that was not even planned-out correctly in Raqqa...The generals have failed in doing what they're supposed to do and the reason is very simple : they were there in the first Iraq war they failed, in the second Iraq war they failed, they haven't won a war, they've been in battles but not wars...[Alex Jones] "So they're ready to fight wars, they're not ready to use Intelligence to cut it off at the head." [S.P.] "You got it...The basic premise of all wars is you win it by using the head not by using guns...you put guns on the ground particularly with the Marines you get cannon fodder. I've got boys who've just come back from Africa, they don't know what they were doing in Africa; they don't know why they were shooting at certain people; they don't know why we have troops in...[Alex Jones] "No I know, I understand, so you're saying it is literally just a defense contractor event...[S.P.] "It's the Military Industrial Complex again! We don't need 58 Billion dollars more in a budget that's already bloated to 600 Billion..."

-- Dr. Steve Pieczenik --




Insider Warns Generals Not To Trick America Into A War In Syria

Published on Apr 10, 2017

Steve Pieczenik joins the Alex Jones to break down why attacking Syria would be a fatal mistakes for the Trump presidency and how it would put him into the hands of the globalists.




Steve Pieczenik:
Neo Cons Want To Destroy America/Gorsuch Is Dangerous And Can't Be Trusted



[Middle East Disaster]


Published on Mar 21, 2017

Hear what I have to say about Military Spending. Cut the budget! Don't add to it ! Please listen POTUS Trump.


Published on Mar 23, 2017

Dr. Steve Pieczenik explains how the Neo-Cons are attempting to destroy America as well as what he thinks about Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.


Published on Apr, 2017

Hear me on two issues: Brexit will have an IMPACT on U.S. and plz Potus, get out of ME. Its a disaster.




Pawns On The Chessboard


 Troops Protect Government Drug Dealing





An independent agency of the United States government responsible for collecting and coordinating intelligence and counterintelligence activities abroad in the national interest; headed by the Director of Central Intelligence under the supervision of the President and National Security Council...There has been considerable criticism of the CIA relating to security and counterintelligence failures, failures in intelligence analysis, human rights concerns, external investigations and document releases, influencing public opinion and law enforcement, drug trafficking, and lying to Congress. In 1987, the former CIA Station Chief in Angola in 1976, John Stockwell, said the CIA is responsible for tens of thousands of covert actions and destablization programs since it was created by Congress with the passage of the National Security Act of 1947. At the time, Stockwell estimated that over 6 million people had died in CIA covert actions.





Featured Video #1 



In the 1960’s an anti-war movement emerged that altered the course of history. This movement didn’t take place on college campuses, but in barracks and on aircraft carriers. It flourished in army stockades, navy brigs and in the dingy towns that surround military bases. It penetrated elite military colleges like West Point. And it spread throughout the battlefields of Vietnam. It was a movement no one expected, least of all those in it. Hundreds went to prison and thousands into exile. And by 1971 it had, in the words of one colonel, infested the entire armed services. Yet today few people know about the GI movement against the war in Vietnam.






Obama Now Global Head of Alqaeda!






Troops Protect Government Drug Dealing

U.S. Military Killing Its Own Troops!

War and Collateral Damage

Subverting The Public

The United Nations






North Atlantic Treaty Organization


Ever since its inception there have been those who have warned that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, far from offering a simple "collective security" pact to ensure the integrity of its member nations' borders, would in fact be used as an offensive tool of imperial adventurism and conquest. Since the NATO-led Kosovo bombing campaign of 1999 at the very least, those fears have appeared more and more justified.

Since that time, NATO has continued to take a lead role in more and more overtly offensive campaigns of aggression in theatre after theatre. By now it is commonly understood to be an extension of the Pentagon itself, a convenient international military instrument for Washington to wield whenever the pretense of an international consensus cannot be achieved at the UN Security Council. -- James Corbett


NATO is the first attempt in history to establish an aggressive global military formation, one which currently includes a third of the nations of the world either as members or partners, has members and partners on five continents and has conducted active operations on four, with the potential to expand its reach into the remaining two where it has not yet officially intruded itself...As NATO continues to expand across the globe through a series of partnerships, initiatives and dialogues, what was once a collective security agreement is increasingly becoming a global military strike force capable of bombarding, invading and occupying countries anywhere in the world.








The Crime Of Aggression:

Condemned By The Law Of Nature And Nature’s God

The Crime of Aggression is the most serious crime a nation can commit. The condemnation of this crime is rooted in both Natural and Biblical Law. The preparation for committing this crime almost caused David his kingdom. In judgment upon David for planning this crime, God destroyed tens of thousands of David's fighting men, and had David not repented, the nation of Israel itself would have been destroyed.

Sadly, almost no preacher even deals with this subject and almost no Christian has ever heard it explained. Yet it is one of the most important laws dealing with nations in the entire Bible. The committing of this crime constitutes much of the current crisis in America and the world today.

In this DVD, Dr. Baldwin explains this almost forgotten and extremely important doctrine. This is a message you will likely hear nowhere else. Buy DVD Here


LINKS: Asleep at the Switch , Morality and Politics






"Let's look at the track records, what kind of news source in the U.S. let's say in the past fifteen years, twenty years, has the highest level of disseminating fake news? I'm talking about factual grounds, I'm not talking about sensationalism or embellishment okay. What were the sources for the WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) stories that were sold to the public, marketed on hourly basis, not even hourly on minutely basis to the public?...Mainstream Media: NBC, NPR, CNN, all these sources. And now that we all know it has been established that for example that WMD stories were all fake, they were lies, they were false...can you recall any of these publications Mainstream Media publications: NBC, CNN, NPR, PBS, ever coming and issuing an official formal retraction? Have you heard any of these channels coming and actually apologizing, and saying we disseminated fake news. And we basically got us into the war by manufacturing consent from the public and that caused tens of billions of dollars if not trillions of dollars in terms of dollar costs, and all these lives, you know...People in Iraq and also American Soldiers died. So you're looking at criminal lie in this case, but what kind of consequences those Mainstream Media channels have faced?"

-- Sibel Edmonds --



Sound Clip Features Darrin McBreen




...And Beware of ALT-Media

Operation Mockingbird 2.0

- Douglas Valentine, The CIA as Organized Crime -



The History (And Future) of Social Engineering

Corbett Report Extras
Published on Dec 19, 2016

SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=10505

In this interview from 2014, James Corbett joins Walter Hendricks of The Solvinur Event to discuss social engineering. James and Walter break down propaganda and PR, advertising and education, how the media is used to form our habits and opinions, and how to fight back against the social engineers


Alternative to What? The BFP Roundtable Dissects the "Alternative" Media

Published on Jan 11, 2014

SUPPORT BOILING FROGS POST:http://ur1.ca/ge4h7

Alternative to what and independent of whom? These are the questions that are seldom asked of the pseudo-alternative, foundation-funded and establishment-dependent "alternative" media. Today on the BFP Roundtable, Sibel Edmonds, Peter B. Collins, Guillermo Jimenez and James Corbett discuss the meltdown of the dinosaur media paradigm and how the establishment is using the pseudo-alternatives to continue to forward their agenda. We also discuss ways of counteracting this and positing real solutions to the problems we are facing.

Meet Edward Bernays, Master of Propaganda

Corbett Report Extras
Published on Oct 2, 2017

Description:You’ve heard of his uncle Sigmund, so how come you’ve never heard of him? This week, we dish the dirt on Freud’s American nephew, the man who literally wrote the book on propaganda, and paved the way for women’s smoking, fluoride poisoning our water supply and the invasion of Guatemala, among other masterful acts of PR

Exposed: Clinton Train Paid The Young Turks $20 Million (Full Video)

Published on Aug 25, 2017


In this week’s episode of Newsbud’s Spiro Reports, Spiro investigates the deep state’s role in influencing the so-called alternative media. Recently the Young Turks secured an investment deal for $20 million. You know what they say, follow the money! Find out what we discovered in this hard hitting Newsbud community exclusive as we uncover the shady powerful network within the Clinton train who is pulling the money strings for the Young Turks. Plus, find out what former FBI whistleblower and Newsbud Founder Sibel Edmonds had to say about the Young Turk front man only at Newsbud.com

Show Notes: http://bit.ly/2wEpL1t



This film explores the evolution of propaganda and public relations in the United States, with an emphasis on the elitist theory of democracy and the relationship between war, propaganda and class.

A deep, richly illustrated study of the nature and history of propaganda, featuring some of the world's most insightful critics, Psywar exposes the propaganda system, providing crucial background and insight into the control of information and thought.


An Excerpt From The Film:

lMikela Jay: The head of the Rendon Group, John Rendon, denies that he is a “national security strategist” or a “military tactician”. Rather, he states: “I am a politician and a person who uses communication to meet public policy or corporate policy objectives. In fact, I am an information warrior and a perception manager.”

Following the First Gulf War, Rendon was paid $23 million by the CIA to create anti-Saddam propaganda. Following 9/11, he was charged with public relations for the U.S. bombing of Afghanistan.

Rendon is far from alone. Public relations has mushroomed into a $200 billion a year industry with PR “flacks” in the United States now outnumbering journalists.

Propaganda has become the primary means by which the wealthy communicate with the rest of society. Whether selling a product, a political candidate, a law, or a war, seldom do the powerful deliver messages to the public before consulting their colleagues in the public relations industry.

Colin Powell presents a now typical case. He didn’t choose a seasoned diplomat for the position of Under Secretary of State. Instead, he chose Charlotte Beers known in PR circles as “The Queen of Madison Avenue.” Her resumé includes successful advertising campaigns for Head & Shoulders dandruff shampoo, Uncle Ben’s rice, and now, Uncle Sam.

Excerpt Continues on Next Column

The Following Quote is Relevant to Many Spheres Including Media:

"We have been conditioned our entire lives to expect that anything that opposes a demonstrably evil entity must itself be good. Whether it be the Star Wars Rebel Alliance fighting the Galactic Empire or the heroic Allies fighting the villanous Axis or even the more nuanced case of a valiant Serpico fighting the corruption within his own NYPD, we are almost invariably given narratives with identifiable “good guys” fighting risible “bad guys.”

But when it comes to the machinations of global geopolitics, this is completely the wrong lens through which to understand what is happening. Much more to the point would be the metaphor of rival gangs competing for territory. It is not the case that the Bloods are the “good guys” and the Crips the “bad guys” or vice versa; they are both criminal networks that use brutality and violence to enforce their control over given areas and to terrorize others.

Similarly, if we understand that rivalries between various international organizations (to the extent that they exist at all) are really only battles between gangsters for control over the global turf, we can more clearly understand that it is not a question of choosing sides in the struggle, but opposing the very ideologies of centralized, hierarchical control that make these institutions possible."  - James Corbett, Phoney Opposition: The Truth About the BRICS





PSYWAR Continued -

John Stauber (PR Watch): You see a news show. You watch 60 Minutes or a Fox program, or whatever it is. You tend to give more credibility to what you’re told is journalism. If an advertisement comes on hopefully you tend to be more skeptical of that because obviously, somebody put an awful lot of money into crafting this slick TV ad and airing it.

But what you probably never suspect is that that news story you just watched was also crafted by a company, given to the TV station or network with the understanding that they would put their own logos on it, identify it as real journalism, and air it.

Mikela Jay: Colonel Sam Gardiner would eventually chart 50 false news stories created and leaked by the Bush White House propaganda apparatus prior to and during the assault on Iraq.

Foremost amongst these were the lies that led to the war in the first place. “It was not bad intelligence that led to the invasion”, concludes Gardiner. “It was an orchestrated effort that began before the war” and was “meticulously planned” to manipulate the public.

John Stauber: In 2002, when the Bush administration was conducting its massive public relations campaign to sell the war out of Donald Rumsfeld’s office in the Pentagon, there was something now referred to as the Pentagon pundits program where literally scores of former high-ranking military generals and admirals and colonels were getting their talking points for their appearances on TV news shows directly from the Pentagon.

They would literally go to the Pentagon, be on phone conferences with the Pentagon, travel with the Pentagon, and then go on TV as supposedly independent sources. Although most of them were actually being paid in the private sector – because these were retired military officials – by defense contractors. And many of them were actually registered lobbyists for military contractors.

So there’s a bit of a conflict-of-interest right away when your bread and butter is based on being able to sell armaments and bombs and missiles and you’re supposed to be just a patriotic ex-general giving an honest opinion to what’s going on.

And even though that’s illegal, there’s no way to really stop it. And the most powerful medium through which it occurred refuses to even report on the scandal. You’ve got just a massive problem, and that’s where we’re at.



How Government Tries To Mess With Your Mind

By Douglas Valentine

Fake Alternative News Exposed! (Full Documentary)

Published on Aug 31, 2017

Join the community
tyrannyunmasked.us AND
www.con-tru.com/ Subscribe to our censorship free channels before its too late!: minds.com

Additional Information:

Alex Jones admits his family and father worked for the CIA

Alex Jones Admits he has Family Connections to the C.I.A.

@28:17 "...whenever I go to a family reunion half the people in the room are former retired CIA." - Alex Jones


Douglas Valentine
The CIA as Organize Crime

"If you give a man the correct information for seven years, he may believe the incorrect information on the first day of the eighth year when it is necessary, from your point of view, that he should do so. Your first job is to build the credibility and the authenticity of your propaganda, and persuade the enemy to trust you although you are his enemy."

- A Psychological Warfare Casebook Operations Research Office Johns Hopkins University Baltimore (1958)

Link: C.I.A.

Pentagon Spending Billions on PR to Sway World Opinion

Published on Feb 11, 2009

As it fights two wars, the Pentagon is steadily and dramatically increasing the money it spends to win what it calls "the human terrain" of world public opinion. In the process, it is raising concerns of spreading propaganda at home in violation of federal law.


Human Resources
Social Engineering in the 20th Century


Human Resources: Social Engineering in the 20th Century explores the rise of mechanistic philosophy and the exploitation of human beings under modern hierarchical systems. Topics covered include behaviorism, scientific management, work-place democracy, schooling, frustration-aggression hypothesis and human experimentation.

"Essentially", says Scott, "this film is about the rise of mechanistic philosophy and the exploitation of human beings under modern hierarchical systems."  

PROPAGANDA - The Public Mind In The Making:

"In almost every act of our lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons [...] who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires that control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world."
  p. 37–38

"Propaganda is the executive arm of the invisible government."
  p. 48

"The new profession of public relations has grown up because of the increasing complexity of modern life and the consequent necessity for making the actions of one part of the public understandable to other sectors of the public. It is due, too, to the increasing dependence of organized power of all sorts upon public opinion. Governments, whether they are monarchical, constitutional, democratic or communist, depend upon acquiescent public opinion for the success of their efforts and, in fact, government is government only by virtue of public acquiescence. Industries, public utilities, educational movements, indeed all groups representing any concept or product, whether they are majority or minority ideas, succeed only because of approving public opinion. Public opinion is the unacknowledged partner in all broad efforts. The public relations counsel, then, is the agent who, working with modern media of communications and the group formations of society, brings an idea to the consciousness of the public."
  p. 63

"If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing it?"
  Page 71 (1928 edition?)

"If you can influence the leaders, either with or without their conscious cooperation, you automatically influence the group which they sway. But men do not need to be actually gathered together in a public meeting or in a street riot, to be subject to the influences of mass psychology. Because man is by nature gregarious he feels himself to be member of a herd, even when he is alone in his room with the curtains drawn. His mind retains the patterns which have been stamped on it by the group influences."
  Page 73 (1928 edition)

"But when the example of the leader is not at hand and the herd must think for itself, it does so by means of clichés, pat words or images which stand for a whole group of ideas or experiences. Not many years ago, it was only necessary to tag a political candidate with the word interests to stampede millions of people into voting against him, because anything associated with "the interests" seemed necessary corrupt. Recently the word Bolshevik has performed a similar service for persons who wished to frighten the public away from a line of action. By playing upon a old cliché, or manipulating a new one, the propagandist can sometimes swing a whole mass group emotions."
  Page 74

"No serious sociologist any longer believes that the voice of the people expresses any divine or specially wise and lofty idea. The voice of the people expresses the mind of the people, and that mind is made up for it by the group leaders in whom it believes and by those persons who understand the manipulation of public opinion. It is composed of inherited prejudices and symbols and clichés and verbal formulas supplied to them by the leaders."
  Page 109







Troops Illegally On The Street


Posse Comitatus Act




Climate Engineering DOOM




All U.S. Under Virtual Surveillance


National Security Agency


  DHS Arming For War With Americans 


Sodium Fluoride


Govt Admits Fluoride Damages Kids








World Trade Organization


Why The WTO Is Bad For You


The Technocratic Era


Transhumanism Technocratic Era



A Brief History of False Flag Terror



False Flag Event


Edu Dept Purposely Perverting Kids


Onslaught On Education

U.S. Govt Assassinating Americans


Assassination Program



Controlled Mainstream Media


Media Controllers


RED ALERT: America Takedown Plan


You Are Being Targeted




Bread and Circus






Mastering The Human Domain

  • Who You Are – Collected information includes names, addresses, biometrics, social media accounts . 
  • What You Do – Travel history, communications, financial transactions and movement of physical assets. 
  • Who You Know – Relational information including family, friends, associates and organizations. 
  • Context – Contextual data such as demographics, politics, cultural norms and religion. 


A closer look at the upcoming Jade Helm military exercise, specifically its “master the human domain” motto, reveals a larger agenda in regards to domestic policy.

...“They’re building an infrastructure of tyranny,” stated Infowars David Knight. “There’s a legal infrastructure with things like the NDAA, there’s a technical infrastructure with things like the capability to do dragnet surveillance, and then of course there is going to be a military and law enforcement infrastructure, and those are merging.”




Full Presentation







While it may rate up there with the best in gaming, America's Army is not an exercise in largesse towards the gaming community. It's essentially a propaganda tool funded to the tune of more than $US10 million ($A11.1 million) of US taxpayers' money designed to attract young people to military life.

The US Army spends an estimated $US1.5 million annually to support the game, a drop in the $US583 million ocean of the army's recruitment advertising budget last year. But the modest expense is reaping big dividends with 28 per cent of players clicking through to the US Army's recruitment site and about 40 per cent of new US Army recruits in 2005 having played the game before signing up.


Propagandizing Through Games




The Fall of Iraq 

- What You Aren't Being Told -

Iraq is descending into chaos, but not for the reasons you're being fed by the politicians and the mainstream media. Sources and full transcript:









Criminal governments armed Isis/Al-qaeda with weapons, including estimated 20,000 missiles to steal, kill, and to destroy for a New World Order.






Obama Now Global Head of Alqaeda!

Troops Protect Government Drug Dealing

U.S. Military Killing Its Own Troops!




The Federal Reserve

The Obama Deception

Road to World Government

Don't Trust Mainstream Media

Seal Team 6 Was Executed

Total Despotism in America

The Fake War On Terror

The United Nations

False Flag Event








False Flag Event


America Armed ISIS!!

American Border Debacle


The Federal Reserve 





LINK : American Border Debacle





Popular Subjects























The Site Map Allows Viewing Content In Hierarchical Layers Or Alphabetically







"We have arrived at a period in American and world history when being awake is of utmost importance. Being in a position of leadership and yet asleep to critical issues at such a time will certainly lead to the ‘disastrous results..." -- An excerpt from, Asleep At The Switch: An Open Letter to America's Pastors

Asleep at the switch: An Open Letter to America's Pastors 

Asleep at the switch: An Open Letter to America's Pastors  






 Please note that this site is under construction so be sure to refresh your browser often. Also, allow your video selection to play smoothly by pressing play and then pause. After it buffers for a moment then resume to play for uninterrupted viewing.


 look into it






look into it videos 


invisible empire



hollerith dvd


obama deception


fall of the republic


Aaron Russo 


Terror Storm final cut 



police state 4


blueprint of madmen