Look Into It - AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example
Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally
by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts
on the environment. When you start doing deep research into Agenda 21, you will find that describing it as a
"comprehensive plan" is an understatement. Virtually all forms of human activity impact the environment. The rabid
"environmentalists" behind the green agenda intend to take all human activity and put it into a box called
"sustainable development". One of the key elements of "sustainable development" is population control. The United
Nations (along with radical "environmental" leaders such as Al Gore) actually believes that there are far too many
people on earth.
"These guys think they have the right to drop a damn tripod in the
ground and put a sniper rifle on it so if you cross a line they can put a bullet in you? Who the hell is the man
behind the trigger? When he pulls the trigger, which one of us is he gonna shoot? Good God didn't he grow up in
this country? Are we gonna give it up? "
"This is a helluva lot bigger than Cliven Bundy. They are
setting a precedent."
- Nevada Rancher Town Board Meeting -
Agenda 21 explained very well. Including implications it will have on humanity. Opinions
within the video come in some cases from those that were in on the negotiations. Truly an interesting
Why is the federal government so obsessed with grabbing
more land? After all, the federal government already owns more than 40 percent of the land in 9 different U.S.
states. Why are federal bureaucrats so determined to grab even more? Well, the truth is that this all becomes much
clearer once you understand that there is a very twisted philosophy behind what they are doing. It is commonly
known as “Agenda 21″, although many names and labels are used for this particular philosophy. Basically, those that
hold to this form of radical environmentalism believe that humanity is utterly destroying the planet, and therefore
the goal should be to create a world where literally everything that we do is tightly monitored and controlled by
control freak bureaucrats in the name of “sustainable development”. In their vision of the future, the human
population will be greatly reduced and human activity will be limited to strictly regulated urban areas and travel
corridors. The rest of the planet will be left to nature. To achieve this goal, a massive transfer of land from
private landowners to the federal government will be necessary.
So the conflict between Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and the BLM is really just the tip of the iceberg. The
reality is that the BLM has their eyes on much bigger prizes.
For example, Breitbart is reporting that the BLM is looking at grabbing 90,000
privately-held acres along the Texas/Oklahoma border…
After the recent Bundy Ranch episode by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Texans are becoming more
concerned about the BLM’s focus on 90,000 acres along a 116 mile stretch of the Texas/Oklahoma boundary. The
BLM is reviewing the possible federal takeover and ownership of privately-held lands which have been deeded
property for generations of Texas landowners.
Sid Miller, former Texas State Representative and Republican candidate for Texas Agriculture Commissioner,
has since made the matter a campaign issue to Breitbart Texas.
“In Texas,” Miller says, “the BLM is attempting a repeat of an action taken over 30 years ago along the Red
River when Tommy Henderson lost a federal lawsuit. The Bureau of Land Management took 140 acres of his property
and didn’t pay him one cent.”
Needless to say, officials down in Texas are not pleased about this. In fact, just check out what the attorney
general of Texas is saying…
Gen. Abbott sent a strongly-worded letter to BLM Director Neil Kornze, asking for answers to a series of
questions related to the potential land grab.
“I am deeply concerned about the notion that the Bureau of Land Management believes the federal government
has the authority to swoop in and take land that has been owned and cultivated by Texas landowners for
generations,” General Abbott wrote. “The BLM’s newly asserted claims to land along the Red River threaten to
upset long-settled private property rights and undermine fundamental principles—including the rule of law—that
form the foundation of our democracy. Yet, the BLM has failed to disclose either its full intentions or the
legal justification for its proposed actions. Decisions of this magnitude must not be made inside a
bureaucratic black box.”
In an exclusive interview with Breitbart Texas, General Abbott said, “This is the latest line of attack by
the Obama Administration where it seems like they have a complete disregard for the rule of law in this country
…And now they’ve crossed the line quite literally by coming into the State of Texas and trying to claim Texas
land as federal land. And, as the Attorney General of Texas I am not going to allow this.”
Does the federal government actually need more land?
The federal government does not need more land. But there is an obsession to grab more so that the dictates of
Agenda 21 can be implemented.
The map that I have posted below is a simulation of what the endgame of Agenda 21 might look like. If these
radical environmentalists get their way, the only areas that will be allocated for normal human use will be the
areas in green…
If you do not go along with the “sustainable development”
agenda, you risk being labeled a “threat” to be dealt with.
For example, Senator Harry Reid has used the label “domestic terrorists” to describe those that showed up to support Cliven Bundy at his
Reid could have used lots of other labels. But he specifically chose to call them terrorists. And considering
what the law allows the feds to do to “terrorists”, that is quite chilling.
If so, then you are a “potential terrorist” according to the U.S. government.
We live at a time when the federal government is becoming increasingly oppressive. Just consider the following
excerpt from a recent article by John W. Whitehead…
It’s not just the Cliven Bundys of the world who are being dealt with in this manner. Don
Miller, a 91-year-old antiques collector, recently had his Indiana home raided by the FBI, ostensibly because
it might be in the nation’s best interest if the rare and valuable antiques and artifacts Miller
had collected over the course of 80 years were cared for by the government. Such tactics carried out by anyone
other than the government would be considered grand larceny, and yet the government gets a free pass.
In the same way, the government insists it can carry out all manner of surveillance on
us—listen in on our phone calls, read our emails and text messages, track our movements, photograph our license
plates, even enter our biometric information into DNA databases—but those who dare to return the favor, even a
little, by filming potential police misconduct, get roughed up by the police, arrested, charged with violating
various and sundry crimes.
This was not what our founders intended.
Our liberties and freedoms are being eroded a little bit more with each passing day, and most
Americans don’t even seem to care.
In the end, we will pay a great price for our apathy.
This article was posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 at 5:32 am
Government is using environmentalism to confuse the public
and the Left/Right paradigm to divide the public so they can enslave us in an Agenda 21 future where we have no
property and no rights. The last rancher — “the last man standing” — across the Mojave Desert to the Pacific Ocean,
Cliven Bundy, is in a fight for his rights and your rights against a federal bureaucracy that’s out of control.
This article was posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 at 5:03 am
William F. Jasper covers Maurice Strong,
former Secretary General of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Jeneiro. Strong has stated multiple times that the
United States is the biggest threat to the Earth's future and that the lifestyles of the middle class need to
change. While Strong talks about changing lifestyles, he exempts his own and others that are deciding our future.
Video produced by http://www.libertynewsnetwork.tv
Links to news articles exposing the agenda behind the Rio+20 conference and on the drive for a
UN-administered socialist world government:
COMMENT: With Al Gore & Co. on the verge of making
law of Cap & Trade policies, it is important to recognize the power propaganda that has paved the way for phony
environmentalism and depopulation eugenics.
“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our
responsiblity to bring that about?” - Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme
Opening speech, Rio Earth Summit. 1992
Today, Maurice Strong sits atop the global environmental movement headed by the United Nations and its
interlocking NGO’s and tax-exempt foundations.
Strong is considered to be the person behind the globalization of the foundation-funded environmental movement,
and was the Secretary-General of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment held in 1972, in Stockholm,
He co-authored the ‘Earth Charter’ with Mikhail Gorbachev in 1992. It was Gorbachev who stated in 1996 that the
"threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order."
Strong was recruited by David Rockefeller at the age of 17 and groomed for the role he serves today. Despite not
having a college education, he was a millionaire by his early 20′s and wielded enormous power and influence.
Already in 1972, at the time of this interview, there is talk of doomsday scenarios if people don’t give up
their rights and drastically alter the way they live. Also mentioned in the interview is zero growth, put forward
by theClub of
Rome in the late 60′s/early 70′s, which called for the control of population and economic
growth, and was the precursor to what we see happening today with the US economy and infrastructure being gutted
and sent overseas.
[efoods]In this interview clip Strong discusses his proposal of licenses in order for women to give birth, which
has been of much talk among the elite for the past several decades. In the 70′s, David Rockefeller extended his
praise to communist dictator of China, Mao Zedong, in an article published in the New York Times, for his country’s
one-child policy, which will be the model for the Western nations to follow in the future — hence China’s "Most
Favored Nation" status granted by the UN.
For more information on Strong, see my article titled ‘Eco-economic Warfare and the Planned Collapse of Western
In 1991, the Club published The First
Global Revolution. It analyses the problems of humanity, calling these collectively or in essence the
'problematique'. It notes (laments) that, historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by
enemies in common: "The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to
overcome domestic failure and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat
is as old as mankind itself - when things become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring
the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With
the disappearance of the traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats,
especially those whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so used to classifying
its neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and public
opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new weapons
devised." "In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that
pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their
totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone
together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned
readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural
processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is
The First Global Revolution follows up the earlier 1972
work-product from the Club of Rome titled The Limits to Growth.
In the 1970s, the Club of Rome launched the
book "The Limits to Growth". Essential reading for all those concerned about the future of the planet, the book was
translated into 37 languages. Now, President Emeritus Alexander King and Secretary General Bertrand Schneider
review global problems 20 years on, offering both a warning and an approach to a possible solution to world
problems. Topics covered by this book include the need for the world to convert from a military to a civil economy,
the recognition of the disastrous short-term effects of exploitation by First World countries of Third World
poverty and need, and the containment of global warming: the need to reduce global emissions of carbon dioxide, to
encourage reforestation, to conserve traditional forms of energy and develop alternatives.
THE ARK OF THE COVENANT
Sacred chest where the ancient Hebrews kept the two tablets
containing the Ten Commandments
Earth Worship And The Blasphemous Ark of
"The real goal of the Earth Charter is that it will in fact become like the Ten
- Maurice Strong -
"Do not do unto the environment of others what you do not want done to your own
environment... My hope is that this charter will be a kind of Ten Commandments, a 'Sermon on the Mount', that
provides a guide for human behavior toward the environment in the next century."
- Mikhail Gorbachev, The Los Angeles Times, May 8, 1997 -
Investigative journalist and senior editor of
The New American magazine, William F. Jasper exposes the dangers posed by the "Earth Charter".
Links to informative news articles by The New American magazine and other sources further exposing
the Earth Charter and the drive for a UN-controlled world government:
The New World Religion
Presented to the world as a mystical revelation, the UN Earth Charter is actually a diabolical blueprint for global
The chairman of the Earth Charter Drafting Committee takes issue with this magazine's exposé, "The New World
Religion." The facts show that his objections are not sustainable. http://tinyurl.com/cjew9pb
The Potemkin Global Villages
Far from representing "global civil society," the Earth Charter Community Summits were tiny gatherings of
ultra-left activists financed by wealthy, one-world elitists. http://tinyurl.com/7mmc4f8
The Global School Board
By rejoining UNESCO, the U.S. government is aiding the UN's grab for power and boosting the Earth Charter crusade
to paganize our children. http://tinyurl.com/8axo79w
New Age Roots
New Age paganism provides the global elitists with a ready tool for enchaining individuals in spiritual bondage —
making them prime candidates for citizenship in the New World Order. http://tinyurl.com/7nom5nz
The UN is NOT Your Friend
Behind the mask of peace, brotherhood, and universal understanding, the United Nations promotes terror and tyranny
in order to achieve its real objective: world government. http://tinyurl.com/bu6ncjl
Tendrils of Tyranny
The United Nations has long sought to control all aspects of human endeavor. Its vast bureaucracy is now closer to
that goal than ever before. http://tinyurl.com/7gyvw5z
Eco-agenda for Planetary Control
The Earth Summit's Agenda 21 and other radical proposals ? supposedly intended to save "Mother Earth" ? will bring
untold human suffering and ecological damage. http://tinyurl.com/c4sjb6a
Global Master Plan
Agenda 21, the Biodiversity Treaty, the Wildlands Project, and other United Nations schemes for global control are
the basis for local environmental assaults on property rights. http://tinyurl.com/czp5egx
Hijacking "Spaceship Earth"
Claiming that Earth is a spaceship with limited resources requiring central control, globalists are steering
humanity into the black hole of UN-dominated world government. http://tinyurl.com/bw97mpg
Shaping Things To Come
Seeking to impose their global vision of a tyrannical "utopia," powerful elitists have effectively used science
fiction to evangelize for their cause. http://tinyurl.com/6peytb4
The evidence is in that free-market principles and private ownership of natural resources provide better
stewardship of the environment than government controls ever could. http://tinyurl.com/bo6mybf
Behind the Environmental Lobby
It may seem stranger than fiction, but it's a documentable fact: the eco-socialist movement is financed by the
super-rich as part of a comprehensive agenda for global control. http://tinyurl.com/clprr3r
Some Christians see the decay of the world as predestined and inevitable, so they withdraw from society. Such a
retreat, however, only contributes to the growth of evil. http://tinyurl.com/cn7pc74
Evangelicals Are Selling Out To The New World Order
"From the least to the greatest, all are greedy for gain; prophets and priests alike, all
practice deceit. They dress the wound of my people as though it were not serious. 'Peace, peace,' they say, when
there is no peace. Are they ashamed of their loathsome conduct? No, they have no shame at all; they do not even
know how to blush. So they will fall among the fallen; they will be brought down when I punish them," says THE
In its 2010 review of grants extended from
2005 to 2010, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund admits to buying off (quite literally) so-called “non-green voices”-
meaning people outside the environmental community- to sell man-made climate change doctrine to their respective
communities. “(…) foundation dollars extended to support these non-green voices have grown dramatically (…). The
RBF has supported “allied voices for climate action” that include businesses, investors, evangelicals, farmers, sportsmen, labor, military leaders, national security hawks, veterans,
youth, and governors and mayors.”
Enforcement of The Agenda21 Scheme Through
Bureaucracy, Balkanization, and Intimidation
"It was kind of like how the Romans used to conquer little villages in the Mediterranean.
They'd go into a little Turkish town somewhere, they'd find the first five guys they saw and they would crucify
them. And then you know that town was really easy to manage for the next few years."
“I feel that this needs to be put out for the public to
Mikael Thalen Infowars.com April 20, 2014
New photos released by the Bundy family Sunday provided
more evidence to the claim that the Bureau of Land Management was illegally killing and burying confiscated
Posted to the official Bundy Ranch Facebook page, the gruesome
image shows several dead cattle being removed from a makeshift grave discovered just this weekend.
“Digging up 1 of the HUGE holes where they threw the cows that they had ran to death or shot,” the picture’s
description reads. “I feel that this NEEDS to be put out for the public to see.”
The picture backs up reports by several people including Nevada assemblywoman Michele Fiore, who commented on
the BLM’s cattle graves last Tuesday.
“Near their compound, right off the highway, they were digging holes,” Fiore said. “They tried to bury some cows on the compound, but I guess they didn’t dig the hole
deep enough, so they throw a cow in and they put dirt over him and you have cows’ legs sticking up out of the
Fiore also displayed several photos on her Twitter account Sunday, labeling
the incident the “BLM Massacre.”
Video from the area also revealed holes in water tanks, a smashed tortoise burrow, as well as destroyed
fences and water lines.
“They had total control of this land for one week, and look at the destruction they did in one week,” Corey
Houston, family friend of Cliven Bundy, told Fox News last week. “Nowhere in the court order that I saw does it say
that they can destroy infrastructure, destroy corrals, tanks … desert environment, shoot cattle.”
“There were hundreds, hundreds of people from around the country that came there,” Reid said at an event in Las
Vegas. “They had sniper rifles in the freeway. They had weapons, automatic weapons. They had children lined up.
They wanted to make sure they got hurt first … What if others tried the same thing?”
Unsurprisingly, proof of automatic weapons being present during the stand off between peaceful protesters and
the BLM was not provided by Reid. Video of the incident also clearly shows only men and woman, most of whom were unarmed,
lined up peacefully.
Whether it be assaulting a cancer survivor, attacking a pregnant woman, tasereing protesters, killing
animals or unleashing an attack dog, all extreme behavior has exclusively come from the BLM.
This article was posted: Sunday, April 20, 2014 at 5:48 am
There are many important aspects of the Bundy Ranch standoff but what brought the story to the
attention of InfoWars and then the nation's attention was the iron-fisted tyranny of an army of bureaucrats. Ron
Paul warned of this in 1997. His warnings have now come true.
“Hoofed locusts.” That’s how Sierra Cub founder John Muir
saw domestic sheep and cattle. It is a term later adopted by Earth First! anarchist and “EcoWarrior” Edward Abbey
and other radical enviro-actvists.
Muir, Abbey, and their ilk harbor equal (or, perhaps, greater) contempt for the
farmers and ranchers who inflict the “hoofed locusts” on Mother Earth. The “locust” farmers/ranchers, like the
“destructive” critters they produce, must be eradicated (humanely, of course), say the activists. That is why
Cliven Bundy (shown) and his family’s ranch in Clark County, Nevada, are now in the headlines.
In the 1980s, a broad coalition of the major enviro-actvist groups targeted cattle ranching for extinction.
Specifically, they initiated a multi-pronged, long-term plan to evict livestock from the vast “public lands” of the
Western states. They planned to drive out all the ranchers by 1993, thus their slogan at the time: “Cattle Free by
Some of that plan was detailed at a “Public Interest Law Conference” held March 7-10, 1991 at the University of
Oregon School of Law in Eugene, Oregon.
A key presenter at the conference was Roy Elicker, counsel for the National Wildlife Federation. Central to
Elicker’s message was the point that ranchers could be driven off range, the “public lands," by simply driving them
out of business with costly fees and regulations.
“In other words,” he told
the conferees, “if you start making them pay their true cost of what they're doing, they're going to fold
up. They can't — if they got to go out and move that cow around six times, by the time they're done, they've lost
So, the activists must work closely with the politicians and the federal and state agencies to make it too
expensive for the ranchers to stay in business — force them into bankruptcy.
Elicker warned the attendees that they would not be able to accomplish this overnight; it was a plan that would
take years, but would gradually yield big, permanent results.
So one of the keys is, when I talk about opportunities to make a difference,
is not only the fact — you know, what everyone likes is the big victory. You load up them cattle trucks for the
last time and it goes riding off into the sunset and they never come back.
That comment and vision for the future drew laughter and applause from the audience. Elicker
But you can win a lot more victories than that ultimate one. You can win a
lot more victories by making him pay for what he does out there and by making it so expensive in his operation and
making all these changes for him to continue to run the cattle on the public lands, he goes broke.
The plan outlined by Elicker (and others) was implemented by the National Public Lands Grazing Campaign
(NPLGC) and other Big Green allies. A key component of that campaign has been to falsely portray ranchers such as
the Bundys as “welfare ranchers.” Over the past couple of decades, the overall campaign has been very successful in
driving many ranchers off the land.
Of course, this is the same strategy that was publicly announced by then-Senator Barack Obama, as he campaigned
for the White House in 2008, when he assured his “green” backers that he would escalate the “war on coal.”
Candidate Obama promised:
So, if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can — it’s just that it will
bankrupt them, because they are going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being
Obama’s Region Six EPA Administrator Al Armendariz carried this philosophy to its logical conclusion, advocating
that EPA officials use their “authority” with brutal efficiency. Armendariz said that his philosophy of enforcement
“was kind of like how the Romans used to conquer little villages in the Mediterranean. They’d go into a little
Turkish town somewhere, they’d find the first five guys they saw, and they would crucify them. And then you know
that town was really easy to manage for the next few years.”
According to Armendariz, you find folks who are not in compliance with the EPA’s constantly changing, draconian
edicts, and “you hit them as hard as you can, make examples of them. There’s a deterrent there.”
The problem for Armendariz was that his comments were videotaped and went viral on the Internet, forcing him to
tender a hasty resignation, in order to spare his boss political blowback. (To see a YouTube video of his remarks,
So it goes against all of the natural resource industries that are essential to sustaining a large, modern,
industrialized society: farming, ranching, mining, logging, energy, fishing — all of these are under concerted,
In the case of the current Bundy ranch/BLM conflict, one of the main hired guns of the Big Government/Big Green
combine is the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD). As one would expect, the wealthy urban green militants at CBD
claim to be watching out for all of the furry, fluffy, feathery, scaley creatures whose habitats are threatened by
the big, bad invasive species, Homo Ranchero.
KREM News, the CBS affiliate in Spokane, Washington, provide this short news item on the CBD connection:
Environmentalists accused the bureau of capitulating to threats of violence from
armed Bundy supporters and urged them to pursue action against the rancher. "The BLM has a sacred duty to manage
our public lands in the public interest, to treat all users equally and fairly," said Rob Mrowka, senior scientist
with the Center for Biological Diversity. "Instead it is allowing a freeloading rancher and armed thugs to seize
hundreds of thousands of acres of the people's land as their own fiefdom." "The BLM is setting a dangerous
precedent in announcing that it will pick and choose who has to follow federal laws and who it will reward for
violating them," he added. [Bureau of Land Management spokesman Craig] Leff declined to comment, reiterating that
the bureau's top concern was the safety of its employees and the public. In April 2012, the Center for Biological
Diversity filed a notice of intent to sue the bureau for canceling a planned roundup of Bundy's cattle at the last
A direct violation of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of
April 11, 2014
The establishment media is now
paying attention to Cliven Bundy and his struggle with the Bureau of Land Management. Most of this coverage assumes
Bundy is engaged in illegal cattle grazing on federal land.
“The U.S. government is rounding up Bundy’s cattle that it says have been
grazing illegally on public lands in Clark County for more than 20 years, according to the land-management
bureau and the National Park Service,” CNN reports today.
The BLM insists “Mr. Bundy has… failed to comply with multiple court orders to remove
his cattle from the federal lands and to end the illegal trespass.”
The clause, known as the Enclave Clause, authorizes Congress to purchase, own and
control land in a state under specific and limited conditions, namely “for the erection of forts, magazines,
arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings,” and not, as the feds now insist, to protect an endangered
The Founders were opposed to providing a centralized federal government with
unlimited authority to purchase and, as is routinely the case today, seize state and private land.
During the federal convention debates in September, 1787, Elbridge Gerry, who later went on to serve as vice president under James Madison, contended
federal purchase of land “might be made use of to enslave any particular State by buying up its territory, and
that the strongholds proposed would be a means of awing the State into an undue obedience.”
In order to make certain the federal government did not abuse the Enclave Clause, the
words “Consent of the Legislature of the State” were added.
Madison, Jefferson and the Founders were primarily interested in limited government
and the diffusion of federal authority over the states for the protection of individual liberty. In 1992, the
Supreme Court issued an opinion on the framers’ reasoning behind the state consent requirement (New York v.
“The Constitution does not protect the sovereignty of States for the benefit of the
States or state governments as abstract political entities, or even for the benefit of the public officials
governing the States. To the contrary, the Constitution divides authority between federal and state governments
for the protection of individuals. State sovereignty is not just an end in itself: rather,
federalism secures to citizens the liberties that derive from the diffusion of sovereign power.”
Madison knew unlimited federal power inevitably results in unbridled tyranny. “I
venture to declare it as my opinion that, were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended
for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited government established by
the people of America,” he wrote.
Despite the desire of the founders and the originating principles of the nation,
conceived as a constitutional republic, the federal government has repeatedly and habitually exacted dictatorial
authority in Nevada and throughout much of the West.
“The United States government owns and has broad authority to regulate federal lands
in Nevada,” the BLM arrogantly insists. “In response to challenges of federal ownership of the lands in
Nevada, the 9th circuit held that the federal government owned all federal lands in Nevada, and that those lands
did not pass to the state upon statehood.”
This is in direct conflict with Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the
Cliven Bundy’s struggle with the BLM in Nevada is exactly the situation Madison and
the founders tried to prevent. The federal government does not have the constitutional authority to own land,
beyond what is stipulated in the Enclave Clause, and its seizure of land, under the obviously fallacious pretense
of protecting a tortoise, is a serious violation of the Constitution.
Madison made if perfectly clear in Federalist Paper 45:
“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few
and defined… The [federal powers] will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation,
and foreign commerce… the powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the
ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order,
improvement, and prosperity of the State.”
“It’s really about our constitutional rights and statehood,” Bundy has said. “And
whether this area known as the state of Nevada is owned by the United States government or is owned by the
sovereign state of Nevada.”
Mr. Bundy, despite a propaganda campaign to the contrary launched by the federal
government and its subservient media, is absolutely correct – the war shaping up between the Nevada rancher and the
federal government is about states’ rights and, ultimately, the rights of sovereign individuals.
This article was posted: Friday, April 11, 2014 at 10:31 am
Court opinion exposes BLM’s true intent against Cliven
April 17, 2014
For over 20 years, the Bureau of Land Management engaged
in a “literal, intentional conspiracy” against Nevada ranchers to force them out of business, according to a
federal judge whose court opinion exposes the BLM’s true intent against rancher Cliven Bundy.
BLM agents who impounded Cliven Bundy’s cattle.
In his opinion of United States v. Estate of Hage, U.S. District Court Judge Robert C. Jones reveals that
after late Nevada rancher E. Wayne Hage indicated on his 1993 grazing permit renewal that by signing the permit,
he was not surrendering his family’s long-standing water and forage rights on the land, the BLM not only
rejected the permit but also conspired for decades to both deny his family’s property rights and to destroy
their cattle business.
“Based upon E. Wayne Hage’s declaration that he refused to waive his rights — a declaration that did not purport
to change the substance of the grazing permit renewal for which he was applying, and which had no plausible legal
effect other than to superfluously assert non-waiver of rights — the Government denied him a renewal grazing permit
based upon its frankly nonsensical position that such an assertion of rights meant that the application had not
been properly completed,” Judge Jones wrote. “After the BLM denied his renewal grazing permit for this reason by
letter, the Hages indicated that they would take the issue to court, and they sued the Government in the CFC [Court
of Federal Claims.]”
And at that point, Jones explained, the BLM refused to consider any further applications from Hage.
“The entire chain of events is the result of the Government’s arbitrary denial of E. Wayne Hage’s renewal permit
for 1993–2003, and the effects of this due process violation are continuing,” he stated.
Judge Jones continued:
In 2007, unsatisfied with the outcome thus far in the CFC, the Government brought the present civil trespass
action against Hage and the Estate. The Government did not bring criminal misdemeanor trespass claims, perhaps
because it believed it could not satisfy the burden of proof in a criminal trespass action, as a previous
criminal action against E. Wayne Hage had been reversed by the Court of Appeals. During the course of the
present trial, the Government has: (1)invited others, including Mr. Gary Snow, to apply for grazing permits on
allotments where the Hages previously had permits, indicating that Mr. Snow could use water sources on such
land in which Hage had water rights, or at least knowing that he would use such sources; (2) applied with the
Nevada State Engineer for its own stock watering rights in waters on the land despite that fact that the
Government owns no cattle nearby and has never intended to obtain any, but rather for the purpose of obtaining
rights for third parties other than Hage in order to interfere with Hage’s rights; and (3) issued trespass
notices and demands for payment against persons who had cattle pastured with Hage, despite having been notified
by these persons and Hage himself that Hage was responsible for these cattle and even issuing such demands for
payment to witnesses soon after they testified in this case.
By filing for a public water reserve, the Government in this case sought specifically to transfer to others
water rights belonging to the Hages. The Government also explicitly solicited and granted temporary grazing
rights to parties who had no preferences under the TGA [Taylor Grazing Act of 1934], such as Mr. Snow, in areas where the Hages had preferences
under the TGA.
It is necessary to note that under the TGA, according to Red Canyon Sheep Co. v. Ickes (1938), a rancher whose cattle had previously grazed in
the area based upon adjacent land, water rights on the land, etc., has a right to a grazing permit over others
who apply for a permit to graze the area without having previously grazed there.
So in this instance, Hage would have priority over Snow for a grazing permit, but the BLM willfully ignored this
And after the agency filed for a public water reserve, according to Judge Jones, the BLM “sent trespass notices
to people who leased or sold cattle to the Hages, notwithstanding the Hages’ admitted and known control over that
cattle, in order to pressure other parties not to do business with the Hages, and even to discourage or punish
testimony in the present case.”
“For this reason, the Court has held certain government officials in contempt and referred the matter to the
U.S. Attorney’s Office,” he wrote. “In summary, government officials, and perhaps also Mr. Snow, entered into a
literal, intentional conspiracy to deprive the Hages not only of their permits but also of their vested water
“This behavior shocks the conscience of the Court and provides a sufficient basis for a finding of irreparable
harm to support the injunction described at the end of this Order.”
So in other words, the BLM willfully attempted to destroy the Hage family’s livelihood because Hage dared to
assert his existing rights to the land which his family has held since the late 19th century.
And unfortunately the BLM is attempting to do the exact same thing to Cliven Bundy.
“Has Attorney General Eric Holder prosecuted any federal officials for criminal activity and violation of the
Hage family’s constitutionally protected rights? No,” William F. Jasper, senior editor of The New American,
wrote on the subject. “Has Sen. Harry Reid denounced this lawlessness and criminal activity by government
officials and call upon President Obama and Attorney General Holder to protect the citizens of his state from the
depredations of federal officials under their command? No.”
“With attitudes such as those expressed above by Sen. Harry Reid, it is almost a certainty that the recently
defused Bundy Ranch standoff will be replayed again — and in the not-too-distant future. And the outcome could be
much less amicable for all concerned.”
This article was posted: Thursday, April 17, 2014 at 2:26 pm
In 1991, the Club published The First Global
Revolution. It analyses the problems of humanity, calling these collectively or in essence the 'problematique'. It
notes (laments) that, historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by enemies in common:
"The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome domestic failure
and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind
itself - when things become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation
together to face an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance
of the traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those
whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so used to classifying its neighbours as
friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and public opinion with a
great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new weapons
THE GLOBALISTSMOVE FROM THEIRALQAEDA
CREATION,TO FABRICATING HOMEGROWN DOMESTIC
The State Run CIA Media Has Been Propagandizing This
Domestic Terrorism Narrative To Keep The American People Divided And Unable To Unite
Against Real Terrorism Like Agenda 21
The establishment media wasted little time after the
Southern Poverty Law Center sent a letter to the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security
demanding the mailed fist of the state crack down on Americans expressing opposition to an increasingly tyrannical
“There are, in increasingly frightening numbers, cells of angry men in the United States preparing for combat
with the U.S. government. They are usually heavily armed, blinded by an intractable hatred, often motivated by
religious zeal,” a Los Angeles Times op-ed claimed on March 8, a couple days after the SPLC letter went
out warning of another Oklahoma City terrorist bombing.
MSNBC did its part on March 6 by ramping up the paranoia of another
Oklahoma City bombing.
The rant published in the second-largest metropolitan
newspaper in the country – following up on the heels of the grand lady of Mockingbird propaganda, the New York
Times – doesn’t mince words:
“They’re not jihadists. They are white, right-wing Americans, nearly all with an obsessive attachment to guns,
who may represent a greater danger to the lives of American civilians than international terrorists.”
Despite the ethnic diversity of the patriot movement, the LA Times engages in brazen
racism and deliberately singles out white people. This feeds into the SPLC’s absurdist propaganda arguing
folks actively resisting constitutional violations perpetuated by the federal government – from the trashing
the Second Amendment to the Fourth and beyond – are intimately linked to a minuscule and entirely marginalized
white supremacist movement. By raising a fantasy specter of Klansman armed with AR-15s gunning for black and
Latino people, the SPLC and the establishment media are actively colluding in an attempt to demonize and
eventually destroy an increasingly effective political opposition.
As we noted in our response to the SPLC letter, posted on the same day the LA Times op-ed piece
appeared, it is “hardly surprising the SPLC has decided to exploit the growing and diverse movement opposed to a
raft of recently proposed unconstitutional firearms laws and label the movement extremist and akin to domestic
Nothing petrifies urban liberals more than defenders of the Second Amendment, especially when they demonstrate
with brandished firearms. “Patriot groups are motivated by a host of anti-government attitudes, but their primary
focus is guns,” the Times argues. “They are convinced that the government is out to seize their weapons, even
though most legislation is focused on keeping guns out of the hands of criminals or restricting the types of
weapons that can be sold.”
The LA Times sheepishly decries the fact government is unable to do much “to reverse this tide of belligerent
ignorance” on the part of “like-minded Neanderthals” who shelter and encourage “the Timothy McVeighs of the
Instead of a direct police state crack down and mass internment of white people in concentration camps, the
editorial staff of the Los Angeles Times suggests a new COINTELPRO-like program designed to monitor Americans upset
by continual government usurpations and attacks on the libertarian principles enshrined in the Constitution.
“These groups should be closely monitored, with resources adequate to the task, even if it means shifting some
homeland security money from the hunt for foreign terrorists,” they write. As we noted, the groups and individuals
singled out by the SPLC include Alex Jones, We Are Change, Oath Keepers, the Constitution Party, the Tyranny Response Team and thousands of other Americans.
Left unmentioned here is the obvious fact the real enemy of government all along has not been a largely
fantastical al-Qaeda and a comical Saudi hooked up to a dialysis machine in an Afghan cave, but a considerable and
growing domestic patriot movement determined to prevent the incremental move toward authoritarianism and
In 2011, we pointed out the government’s attempt to reconstitute its elaborately fashioned Arab
and Islamic terror meme into a “white al-Qaeda” threat. “Prior to the events in Norway [Anders Breivik's
murderous terror attacks], the Department of Homeland Security released a propaganda video characterizing white middle class Americans as terrorists
and members of white al-Qaeda, a term designed to conflate the image of the CIA-created Islamic terror group and
‘rightwing extremists’ in America,” we wrote.
The overriding absurdity of the LA Times editorial is the obvious fact that it is not merely white people who
are determined to restore America’s constitutional heritage.
It is people of all ethnic persuasions.
Alex Jones breaks down the “white al-Qaeda” meme during the terror attacks in Norway:
Oslo Bombings and Mass Shooting:
Establishment Seeks to Manufacture "White Al-Qaeda" Myth
"Terror is being used as a weapon to destroy the cherished freedoms of democratic societies"
The recent attack on Libya laid bare the iron fist behind the velvet glove of slogans like "human rights" and
"international community." This latest aggression, like the destruction of Yugoslavia and the rape of Afghanistan,
proceeds under the cover of NATO. And what is NATO? Author Richard Cottrell tells the story of mayhem, murder and
subversion behind the "alliance for peace."
Bombing of government
building and mass shooting arrive as establishment seeks to manufacture "white Al-Qaeda"
UPDATE: Oslo Police Conducted
Bombing Exercise Days Before Terrorist Blast
Today's bombing in Oslo and a related mass shooting that occurred just outside the
Norwegian capital are already replete with inconsistencies and questions that demand further inquiry into whose
agenda this deadly attack serves.
Authorities have already said that the man who carried out the shootings at a youth
camp in a nearby resort has direct ties to the earlier bombing in Oslo of a government building.
- An eyewitness to the blast who was just 200 feet away from the explosion called
into the Alex Jones show and stated that there was a "bomb sweep" of the area the day before the attack. Norwegian
television also reported this story.
- According to a Norwegian who emailed us, his father who is an explosives expert has
analyzed the bombing scene and states that due to the pattern of the damage and debris, the blast was clearly
underground. There are also reports that the road was closed off in recent days for underground sewer works. This
is inconsistent with the official story that the blast was caused by a car bomb.
- Friday was a public holiday in Norway and the building that was bombed was largely
empty, which is why only seven people died. The Daily Mail reports, "Fortunately, it is a public holiday in Norway
and the offices are less busy than a normal weekday." Why would "terrorists," who presumably want to kill as many
people as possible, choose to bomb the building on a day when they know it will be almost empty?
- Reports that the culprit of the mass shooting at a Labour youth camp outside Oslo,
who early indications show killed at least 25 people, was a blonde-haired Norwegian man, fit perfectly into the
recent propaganda campaign to hype the "white Al-Qaeda" as the most deadly terror threat. Self-proclaimed security
experts quoted by Reuters are already predicting the blame will "fall on both Islamists and right-wing extremists,"
in some form of alliance that led to a "hybrid assault," which in an of itself is a ludicrous notion but does serve
to link anti-government sentiment amongst the host population with Muslim terrorism, which has been the goal all
- As Kurt Nimmo reports, the man accused of leading the group blamed by some for the
bombing, Mullah Krekar, has had dealings with the CIA previously, having been approached to work with them in 2005.
Members of Krekar's group, Ansar al-Islam, are veterans of the CIA-ISI collaborative war against the Soviets in
- Is the attack a slap on the wrist for Norwegian meddling in the globalist agenda?
Norway is not a member of the European Union and its recent actions will have undoubtedly angered many of the power
players amongst the global elite within that inner circle. Specifically, Norway's support for full Palestinian
statehood, set to be voted on at the UN in September, Norway's decision to reverse its support for the bombardment
of Libya and withdraw completely from the NATO operation on August 1, and Norway's move to freeze a $42 million
dollar payment to Greece, an obvious hindrance to recent efforts to prop up the country's dire debt crisis, are all
massive issues that could have caused a fall out between Norway and the Anglo-American establishment.
The pedigree of Beck’s circle reveals he is not a
libertarian and does not believe in the Constitution
April 25, 2014
Glenn Beck, who fancies himself
a libertarian, is working with corporate media insiders and a former CIA employee who flaunts his membership in the
globalist Council on Foreign Relations. The objective of this group at the very heart of Beck’s operation, now
readily apparent following the Cliven Bundy standoff, is to portray the Nevada rancher as a racist zealot, a member
of a dangerous and outlaw sovereign citizen movement, and inseparable from violent and conspiracy crazed “militia”
domestic terrorists. Beck’s campaign mirrors that of the Obama administration, Eric Holder’s Justice Department and
the liberal media intelligentsia.
Beck and company are exploiting
a carefully crafted meme manufactured in the intervening years since the Oklahoma City bombing by the Southern
Poverty Law Center in partnership with the Department of Homeland Security, the Justice Department and the
establishment media. They are using this government created and SPLC disseminated mythology to foment discord
within the patriot movement and also set the stage for a false flag event that will serve as a coup de
grâce that will destroy the movement.
The correlation between the Obama administration, the Justice Department and Beck
became obvious as the standoff progressed, most notably when Beck began to repeat government talking points to
attack Bundy and his supporters.
Establishment Talking Points
On April 13, as the Bundy
standoff was in full swing, Becket Adams, writing for Beck’s The Blaze, openly echoed the government narrative. He
attempted to disprove Senator Harry Reid’s connection to a Chinese energy firm and plans to build a solar plant
on public land, an effort documented on April 11 by Infowars.com journalist Kit Daniels.
Beck and Adams also cited the debunked claim that the federal government owns and
manages “public land” in Nevada (in direct violation of the Constitution) and insisted Bundy is breaking the law. This claim
conforms to the narrative established by the federal government and its propaganda media.
In addition, Adams supported the claim pushed by the government and the establishment
media that Bundy’s cattle grazing endangered a tortoise (in fact, as Adan Salazar demonstrates, the tortoise has benefited from cattle grazing).
Finally, Adams tried to argue the Bundy family was a threat to heavily armed BLM
agents because they cited Ruby Ridge and Waco and, like millions of ranchers, farmers and other rural Americans,
keep and use firearms. Adams’ commentary is nearly indistinguishable from rhetoric put out by Democrats (and, to a
lesser degree, Republicans, including the Koch Brothers) and the establishment media. In fact, the establishment media dutifully ignored the story until it
went viral in the alternative media and they were required to engage in damage control.
On his nationally syndicated radio show,
Beck accused Alex Jones and Infowars of exploiting the Bundy affair as a catalyst to launch a violent
revolution. “Quite honestly, some of the people from… uh, what’s that stupid website’s name? Infowars,” Beck
said. “Because these guys were so deeply embedded with the Bundys, we thought there’s something wrong… if you
don’t see these guys a mile away, that’s a red flag and it’s not a false flag (laughter). These guys are
dangerous. They are looking for revolution, they’re looking for a fight, and keep those guys a million miles
away. Anybody with any spiritual radar can see that one coming.”
Beck’s accusation appeared several days before Senate majority leader Harry Reid made
similar remarks. Reid characterized Cliven Bundy and his supporters as armed “domestic terrorists.” In addition, Reid called for a “united front” against Bundy, a call
that paralleled Beck’s remark Americans should reject Bundy’s stand against the federal government and should
distance themselves from his supporters who Beck slandered as crazed followers of Alex Jones.
“This morning I got up and I saw some more news reports, and more people in America
that are standing up now and crying for revolution, insurrection, arming yourself, and a call to arms,” Beck said on his radio program on April 15. “I will tell you I believe in the Second
Amendment, and I will defend myself. I believe in the rights that we have. But I will tell you more than I
believe in my rights, I believe in the responsibilities that we have to God. And God does not call
anyone to anger. God does not call anyone to vengeance ever, ever, ever.”
Glenn Beck and Company: CIA, CFR and Establishment Media Insiders
Beck’s coterie is indisputably
linked not only to the establishment media and its endless diversionary game of false left-right politics, but also
the intelligence community. If this does not reveal the true nature of Beck’s operation, nothing does.
Buck Sexton. A Blazetv host, Sexton is Beck’s direct link to the CIA
and the CFR. His LinkedIn profile states he worked for the agency from 2005 until 2010. He also spent
time with the Council on Foreign Relations, the premier globalist organization operating as the shadow
government, a fact revealed by Hillary Clinton.
Betsy Morgan. According to LinkedIn, she is the president of The Blaze and has a background serving the corporate
media, from CEO of AOL’s Huffington Post to Senior Vice President of CBS Interactive. She has an MBA from
Harvard Business School.
Laurie Dhue. She hosts The Blaze’s For the
Record and is the channel’s primary news anchor. She also sports a background in establishment media. Dhue was a
Fox News anchor and worked at MSNBC, a fact demonstrating how effortless the crossover is between so-called
conservative and liberal circles in the establishment.
Considering the pedigree of Beck’s circle, it is obvious he is not a libertarian and
he does not believe in the primacy of the Constitution. It is accurate to say Beck is working in concert with the
government to sabotage patriotic Americans who believe the Bundy standoff and the armed and menacing reaction by
the federal government represent a mortal danger. It is one worth drawing a line in the sand in response as Beck’s
former colleague at Fox News, Andrew P. Napolitano, rightly said.
This article was posted: Saturday, April 26, 2014 at 7:44 am
Magazine article literally asks, “Do
you have what it takes to pull the trigger on a fellow citizen?”
June 13, 2013
The latest installment of the popular Rainbow Six video
game franchise casts Americans fed up with government corruption and banker domination as domestic terrorists
intent on carrying out killings and bombings, yet another startling indication of how media is influencing the
public to accept protesters and people generally upset with the way their government is being run as the new
“In Tom Clancy’s Rainbow 6 Patriots, Team Rainbow faces a new and very real threat called the ‘True Patriots,’ a
highly-trained, well-organized revolutionary group that claim the American government is irrevocably corrupted by
greedy politicians and corporate special interests. The True Patriots will do whatever it takes to reclaim their
country,” Ubisoft’s description of the game states.
The description goes on to label members of the fictitious movement as the “new breed of terrorists,” stating,
“…players will face critical scenarios that will require them to make tough ethical decisions in order to stop this
new breed of terrorists.”
Game Informer Magazine, national retail video game chain Game Stop’s exclusive magazine, claimed a tumultuous
political atmosphere was the motivation for Ubisoft to pit American citizens against federal agents.
From the December 2011 issue of Game Informer:
“Americans are angry and why shouldn’t they be? With an exponentially expanding national debt, crippling
foreclosures, corporate bailouts, degrading infrastructure, dwindling job market and widening income gap
between the haves and have-nots, it’s getting harder to believe politicians when they speak of American
exceptionalism as if it were a fundamental truth.
“In response to gradual erosion of our beloved nation, resentful citizens of all kinds of political
backgrounds are rising up in the form of new political movements like the Tea Party and Occupy Wall
Reading further in the magazine’s short intro for the game, we find the real motivation behind the game’s
“In 2009, the Southern Poverty Law Center reported a massive resurgence in anti-government paramilitary
groups, which have jumped from 43 militias in 2007 to nearly 300 in 2010. The sudden surge has captured the
attention of the Department of Homeland Security, NSA, CIA, and FBI, who all view these groups as a real threat
to the stability of the nation. Moreover, many of these disenfranchised groups frequently put their members
through intense military training exercises – for what, no one knows.”
In their final introductory paragraph, the Game Informer writers ask, “Do you have what it takes to pull the
trigger on a fellow citizen?”
Rainbow 6: Patriots was announced in 2011, but its actual release has been held back. When GameStop pulled
pre-sales from its database without explanation, some speculated the game had been shelved entirely.
However, in a June 2013 interview with IGN, Ubisoft senior vice president of sales and marketing Tony Key confirmed that Rainbow 6:
Patriots would likely be held over for next-gen systems like Playstation 4 and Xbox One.
A look at the game’s trailers shows players that play as members of the Rainbow Six squadron will have no choice
but to shoot innocent people (and even police officers) in certain situations. According to Game Informer, players
will also have the opportunity to play as the terrorists.
This is just the latest example of an ongoing media campaign to demonize Constitutionalists and those seeking to
uphold the principles of the Founding Fathers of the nation, as terrorists.
Earlier this year, we reported on how the cable TV network AMC was producing a show titled, “We Hate Paul Revere,” following two brothers that hate the famous patriot activist who
became a hero during the American Revolutionary War when he went on his “midnight ride” to warn patriots and
patriot militias that the British were coming.
In March, we also discussed how the Fox TV series “The Following” attempted to portray Constitutionalists and militia members as serial
killers and terrorists.
Add these “coincidences” to a July 2012 report we wrote covering a DHS study that characterized Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal
authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists, and you begin to see a
Recently, the Internal Revenue Service was also forced to apologize for targeting patriot and Tea Party groups with extra scrutiny and audits
when they applied for tax exempt status.
As the federal government further embroils itself in scandal after scandal, and as it takes huge strides to
implement a hellish vision of a free society, using an unchecked police state as its muscle – now police in New
York can arrest you for merely annoying them, and recently the Supreme Court ruled that police can take DNA swabs from citizens as a “legitimate police booking procedure” – the desperation to
stifle opposition has become readily apparent.
Watch the propaganda slickly disguised as a video game in
the preview below:
Watch the Infowars Nightly News report on Rainbow Six:
This article was posted: Thursday, June 13, 2013 at 2:24 pm
As a federal appeals court rules that the Obama
administration must divulge its legal basis for launching drone strikes against American citizens, many statists
opposed to Nevada cattle rancher Cliven Bundy’s stand against the government are calling for him and his supporters
to be the victims of what would be America’s first domestic drone attack.
Of course, it’s virtually inconceivable that
the White House would launch a Predator drone strike against U.S. citizens, Harry Reid’s “domestic
terrorist” slur not withstanding, but the mere fact that self-proclaimed liberals are openly calling for
Bundy supporters to be massacred provides us with yet another chilling insight into the warped minds of
The most egregious offense committed by Bundy supporters in the eyes of such people is the fact
that a minority of Bunkerville protesters were carrying guns during last weekend’s
standoff with heavily armed Bureau of Land Management agents.
This again underscores the rampant hypocrisy of leftists who grandstand as gun control advocates
yet fully support the state having a monopoly on firearms. Hundreds of armed BLM agents seizing Bundy’s property
while aiming sniper
rifles at his family members and tasing them for
exercising free speech is not only tolerated by liberals but enthusiastically supported. Indeed, it seems
that many were disappointed that BLM agents didn’t follow through on the slaughter they promised during the
standoff at Bunkerville.
Virtually every point of resentment directed against Bundy by leftists is borne out of repugnant
duplicity and double standards, most notably the charge that Bundy is both engaging in lawlessness and is a
“freeloader” for not paying grazing fees, a criticism liberals are perfectly willing to dispense with when it comes
to the 12 million illegal immigrants living in the United States.
When a group of Occupy Wall Street demonstrators were brutally pepper sprayed during the
infamous incident at UC Davis in 2011 (prompted
by students flouting a law they saw as unjust), liberals were rightly outraged and their fury was shared by
libertarians who have been speaking out against America’s burgeoning police state for years.
However, now that the shoe is on the other foot, liberals have chosen to either ignore the federal
government’s targeting of the Bundy family and their supporters, or in some cases have adopted the role of
cheerleaders in unashamedly urging actual bloodshed.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is
the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
This article was posted: Monday, April 21, 2014 at 3:30 pm
To the discerning eye they are everywhere; Flashpoints of
tyranny threatening to push the nation into open revolt. The standoff between the Bundy ranch and the BLM feds is a
visceral example of growing discontent over an expanding federal government.
These abuses have occurred over many decades, with a focused intent. Centralization of power and a steady
erosion of personal wealth and liberty have been the result. As these abuses and usurpations continue, Americans
will face a choice between submitting or standing firm like the Bundy family did.
The tax foundation recently
reported that Americans pay more in taxes than they do for food and housing expenses
combined. Adding insult to injury, the IRS has been caught in
open political persecution of Tea party organizations opposed to big government.
The average American citizen is more than $70,000 in debt. Now the IRS is seizing
tax refunds of individuals who’s parents had outstanding debt.
President Obama, since taking office in 2009, has proposed 442 new taxes. Obamacare, with all
of its penalties, is effectively another tax. Small business owners on average now
lose about a week of business preparing taxes.
Meanwhile, wealthy elites like the Rockefeller Family and Bill Gates are able to hide their wealth in tax exempt
foundations, which are in turn used to shape the cultural, political and financial spheres of our world.
A Department of Defense training manual
leaked last year revealed that servicemen and women were told that the founding fathers would not be
welcome in today’s military. The document demonizes “extremists” who “…will talk of
individual liberties, states’ rights, and how to make the world a better place.”
An entire fake town has been built in Virginia, complete with Christian churches and subways, for the
military to train for urban occupation.
4th Amendment Eviscerated
Despite its obvious unconstitutional nature, the Supreme Court has yet to decide on the legality of NSA
surveillance. As the Business Insider recently
reported, Justice Antonin Scalia hinted that he would back the NSA spy program. ”The Supreme
Court doesn’t know diddly about the nature and extent of the threat,” Scalia said. “It’s truly stupid that my court
is going to be the last word on it.”
The American people can no longer claim ignorance on the NSA surveillance grid. A detailed multi-dimensional
image of our daily lives is being built with this system. Individuals to entire group dynamics are being tracked.
As it continues to grow, it will be unparalleled in history. Everything from daily travel routes to eating habits
will be traceable. Every day objects will be transmitting data 24/7.
According to former CIA Director David
Patraeus, smart grid technologies will have a monumental impact on “clandestine tradecraft.” Patraeus states,
“Items of interest will be located, identified, monitored, and remotely controlled through technologies such as
radio-frequency identification, sensor networks, tiny embedded servers, and energy harvesters…”
The system – in its mechanized, wicked desire to perpetuate itself – has convinced many of us that we will be
protected and rewarded for following its directives and turning our neighbors in to the authorities, but the truth
is that we all lose when this happens.
“Mr. And Mrs. America, Turn Them All In”
The Bill of Rights has been under attack through multiple
administrations and political parties. The 2nd amendment right to bear arms has endured a sustained attack in
recent years. White house pundit Piers Morgan learned that his anti-Constitutional views weren’t as popular as he
thought when his
CNN show was canceled.
In another demonstration of the morally bankrupt government, Democrat Senator of California Leland Yee, a gun
control advocate, was recently
charged with arms trafficking.
Government runs the guns, we the people are to be disarmed.
“A Long Train of Abuses”
The United States Declaration of Independence states:
“Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and
transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while
evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a
long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under
absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new
Guards for their future security.”
The above outstanding examples are just a few of an innumerable list of such abuses. As power continues to
centralize in a corrupt, morally bankrupt federal government, the necessity to re-assert or even create a new
declaration of independence is becoming more evident. In this process Americans resisting this expansion must hold
the moral high ground. We are not the aggressors, nor do we intend to be. We do recognize, however that Tyranny
will tighten its grip, and as our forefathers wisely knew, the people will tolerate it for a long time. At a
certain critical point that tolerance ceases and the people stand up.
When we do stand up we will stand with the spirit of our ancestors at our back. Police, military, government
employees; You are all invited to join us with open arms in this fight. When this critical point arrives in all its
fury we must hold guiding principles in our hearts. Love of goodness, honor, justice and truth need to give us
strength to cut through the chains.
"...Americans resisting this expansion must hold the
moral high ground. We are not the aggressors, nor do we intend to be. We do recognize, however that Tyranny will
tighten its grip, and as our forefathers wisely knew, the people will tolerate it for a long time. At a certain
critical point that tolerance ceases and the people stand up."
TAKE ACTION NOW BY SUPPORTING THOSE BRAVE MEN AT THE BUNDY RANCH, AND BY BEING PROACTIVE IN YOUR
COMMUNITY. TO HELP YOU GET STARTED CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO THE AUTHOR OF : BEHIND THE GREEN MASK U.N. AGENDA 21.
AND AT THIS LINK : AGENDA 21 YOU CAN HEAR LECTURES FROM ROSA AND MANY OTHERS ON
AGENDA 21 AND WHAT YOU CAN DO.
Oath Keeper, Stewart Rhodes, sends a message to Oath Keepers in his home state of
Oath Keepers Bundy Ranch Debrief
This is the official statement from the Oath Keepers regarding the Bundy Ranch
The Video The Feds Don't Want You To See
Published on Apr 13, 2015
Although no gunshots were fired, what happened at the Bundy
Ranch was a shot fired across the bow using the most powerful weapon in the infowar, the camera. It captured the
iconic moment of the people taking on an aggressive government tyranny, a snapshot that still reverberates one year
later. We look at the lies, the spin and the reality of a federal government openly defying The Posse Comitatus Act
as it threatened and brutalized citizens of the community. Although the sheriff did nothing to protect the
community, neighbor stood with neighbor in true posse comitatus, the “power of the community”, to expel the federal
army from the community.