This top secret think tank has been
pulling the strings of American government for at least 60 years
Born in the wake of World War II as a factory of ideas designed to advise the Air Force on
how to wage and win wars, RAND quickly grew into a magnet for the best and brightest, and became the creator of
America’s nuclear strategy in the struggle against the Soviets. From its ranks arose Cold War luminaries Albert
Wohlstetter, Bernard Brodie, and Herman Kahn, who arguably saved us from nuclear annihilation with their doctrines
of fail-safe and second strike, and unquestionably created what Eisenhower first termed the military-industrial complex.
The Kennedy era brought RAND directly into the corridors of power, where its analysts
became McNamara’s Whiz Kids and its theories of rational warfare steered our conduct in the Vietnam War. Those same
theories would drive our invasion of Iraq forty-five years later, championed by RAND-affiliated actors such as Paul
Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Zalmay Khalilzad, and Donald Rumsfeld. But RAND’s greatest contribution might be its
least known: rational choice theory, a model explaining all human behavior through self-interest. With that theory
RAND sparked the Reagan-led transformation of our social and economic system and also unleashed a resurgence of
precisely the forces whose existence it denied—religion, patriotism, tribalism.
...RAND's ultimate goal was to have technocrats running every aspect of society in pursuit of
aone world governmentthat would be
administered under "the rule of reason," a ruthless world where efficiency was king and men were little more than
machines, which is why RAND studied the social sciences because they were at a loss to work out how to deal with
people and how human beings did not always act in their own predictable self-interests. There is no place for love,
empathy or selflessness inthe new world orderthat RAND
and the Ford Foundation are working to create, and patriotism and altruism are adversarial to their
aims.
Top Hacker: Chicago Nuke Attack Planned For 2015
Guccifer says Illuminati run the planet
by Paul Joseph Watson | November 11, 2014
Guccifer – the Romanian hacker who
accessed private email accounts of numerous top government & military officials as well as the Bush &
Rockefeller family – is quoted in the New York Times as predicting a nuclear attack on Chicago sometime in
2015.
David Knight talks with Paul Joseph Watson in the UK about the claims of famous hacker
Guccifer, he claims that a city in Pennsylvania has been targeted for a nuclear false flag.
Russia Builds Miles of Nuke Bunkers While US Does
Nothing
Published on Mar 27, 2015
Alex Jones uncovers one of the biggest and
most dangerous issues in recent history, a Rosetta Stone that will decode the deception taking place throughout our
world. As Russians build gigantic underground bunkers, spanning 400 square miles, the elite are planning their
escape from America by purchasing airstrips, farms in places like New Zealand, and buying underground shelters in
record numbers. As preparations for nuclear war intensify, the public is being told it's not a danger anymore. Get
this emergency broadcast out to everyone you know before the time for action runs out.
Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions
more. we all want liberty. Find the free live feed at http://www.infowars.com/watch-alex-jo...
Former Top CIA Analyst:
This Is Bigger Than The Cuban Missile
Crisis
Published on Aug 29, 2014
Alex Jones talks with former top CIA analyst and presidential advisor Ray McGovern about
the situation in Ukraine.
Feds warn of “imminent” terror threat on U.S.
border
According to high level sources, ISIS terrorist are operating in
Ciudad Juarez on the border across from the city of El Paso, Texas.The sources state
ISIS operatives will use vehicle born improvised explosive devices in the attacks. Homeland Security, Justice
and Defense Department agents have been placed on high alert “and instructed to aggressively work all possible
leads and sources concerning this imminent terrorist threat,” Judicial Watch reports. The attack is “coming
very soon” the high-level source warned. It is speculated an attack will happen on the anniversary of the
September 11, 2001 terror attacks.“An attack is so
imminent that the commanding general at Ft. Bliss, the U.S. Army post in El Paso, is being briefed, another
source confirms. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not respond to multiple inquiries from Judicial
Watch, both telephonic and in writing, about this information,” reports Judicial Watch.
How could there be aWar on Terror and actually say that we're having
awar against terrorism, and leave the
borders wide open? If you were the President of the United States, or I were the President of the United States,
and9/11 really happened the way they
want us to believe it happened, the first thing you would do is shut down the borders, so people couldn't get in
the country to harm you. But they left the borders wide open. Becausethe bankers want the borders open, because they want
aone-world government. They
want a North American Union. They don't want borders
here.9/11 was only a manifestation.
It was done to create afear in the
American public, so that we willobey what they want us to do.
The SPFOR (to use the inevitable acronym) would be a “hybrid” military/law
enforcement unit created within the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) for use “in a range of tasks such as crowd and
riot control, special weapons and tactics (SWAT), and investigations of organized criminal groups” — both abroad,
in UN-directed multilateral military operations, and at home, as dictated by the needs of the Regime.
Initially as small as 2–6,000 personnel, the SPFOR’s size “could be increased by
augmenting it with additional federal, state, or local police from the United States” as necessary.
The RAND study, which was conducted for the U.S. Army’s Peacekeeping and Stability
Operations Institute, recommended using the Marshals Service rather than the US Army’s Military Police as
host for the SPFOR in order to avoid conflicts with the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids (albeit in
principlemore thanin
practice) the domestic use of the military as a law enforcement
body.
“The USMS hybrid option … provides an important nondeployed mission for the force:
augmenting state and local agencies, many of which currently suffer from severe personnel shortages,” states the
report without explaining how the SPFOR could at once “augment” those under-manned agencies while at the same
timebeing “augmented”
by them if necessary.
That little lapse in logic is one of several indications that the report’s authors weren’t so much addressing a
“problem” as making a case for a preordained “solution” — in this case, creating the vanguard of a militarized
internal security force.
Building the SPFOR within the Marshals Service “would place it where its members can develop the needed skills
under the hybrid staffing option,” summarizes the document. “Furthermore, the USMS has the broadest law enforcement
mandate of any U.S. law enforcement agency…. [This model] provides significant domestic policing and homeland
security benefits by providing thousands of additional police officers across the United States.” (Emphasis
added.)
Back in 1961, the U.S. Government produced a document entitled “Freedom From
War” that envisioned the creation of a globe-spanning United Nations “Peace Force” that
would work in collaboration with a militarized “internal security” force in each country. Since that time, critics
of the UN have anticipated the day when foreign “peacekeepers” would be assigned to police American streets and, if
necessary, confiscate privately owned firearms.
While the monstrosity headquartered on the East River is a proper target of our scorn and hostility, the new
RAND study underscores the fact that if
“peacekeepers” end up patrolling American streets, they probably won’t be foreigners in blue berets, but homegrown
jackboots commanded by Washington.
(My thanks to Jack Slater for tipping me about the RAND report.)
"Liberty
in Eclipse" is a 320-page expose and indictment of our nation's descent into the early stages of police state
tyranny. Topics discussed include the militarization and federalization of law enforcement; the establishment of a
quasi-dictatorial "war presidency"; the evisceration of the Bill of Rights, and due process guarantees going back
to the Magna Carta; the increasingly commonplace surveillance of Americans; the institutionalization of torture;and
the likely restoration of conscription, including a military draft.
In the video below, Alex Jones highlights how the
Guardian Centers video is yet another startling indication that authorities in the United States are preparing for
civil unrest as America increasingly begins to resemble a militarized police state.
Today The Blaze is reporting from their sources for the reasons why the changes are happening.
The timing comes as the five branches of the U.S. armed forces are reducing staff due to budget cuts, and as
U.S. troops are expected to withdraw from Afghanistan next year.
“I think they’re using the opportunity of the shrinkage of the military to get rid of people that don’t agree
with them or not tow the party line. Remember, as (former White House chief of staff) Rahm Emanuel said, never
waste a crisis,” a senior retired general told TheBlaze on the condition of anonymity because he still provide
services to the government and fears possible retribution.
“Even as a retired general, it’s still possible for the administration to make life miserable for us. If we’re
working with the government or have contracts, they can just rip that out from under us,” he said.
Retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, an outspoken critic of the Obama administration, said the White House
fails to take action or investigate its own, but finds it easy to fire military commanders “who have given their
lives for their country.”
“Obama will not purge a civilian or political appointee because they have bought into Obama’s ideology,” Vallely
said. “The White House protects their own. That’s why they stalled on the investigation into fast and furious,
Benghazi and Obamacare. He’s intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a
superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.”
In Obama’s America, the military must forsake their
constitutional oath in favor of blind allegiance to their new commander. And whether it’s top nuke
commanders being removed for failing to play ball with the global elite, or just silencing potential
whistleblowers, top military generals are now speaking out about the ‘mass purge’ within the United States
military.
One such general, a
recipient of the Medal of Honor, has now gone on record in speaking with news
organization WND about the mass culling of high level military officers on behalf of the Obama administration.
Retired Army Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady says that the attack on high level military personnel is so great that it
has now obliterated the morale of troops at large, but is more importantly centered in terminating any high
level individual that will not go along with the plan.
“There is no doubt he (Obama) is intent on emasculating the military and will fire anyone who disagrees with
him,” the retired general told WND.
General Brady’s admission comes just after two of the top nuclear commanders in the United States were
terminated and suspended amid the high level military intelligence we
released surrounding the secret transfer of nuclear weapons from a Texas Airforce base to South Carolina.
And while the terminations were originally reported on by the Associated Press, who has been covering the issue in
depth and even hinting towards our coverage of the missing nuke within their reports, it was revealed by the agency
that the terminations and suspensions were actually found out through leaked emails.
In other words, the mass purge of military officials was never truly intended to meet the public eye. But even
in the face of government secrecy surrounding the issue, numerous news organizations and media figures have now
come out and highlighted the purge of top nuke commanders and others. From Michael Savage
launching an investigation into the missing nuke issue and calling for answers, to WND questioning officials over the military
intelligence.
Overall, the new media has forced this issue into the spotlight, reaching millions with the powerful information
that has been confirmed time and time again by scenarios like Senator Lindsey Graham’s same day speech regarding a nuclear
strike on the exact destination of the nuclear warheads. Meanwhile, the establishment has been busy in attempting
to eliminate high level military officers who will not blindly follow commander Obama on his every unconstitutional
demand.
After multiple top generals described to WND what they
regard as a full-scale “purge” of the U.S. military by the Obama administration, the commander of U.S. Army
Garrison Japan was summarily relieved of duty and his civilian deputy reassigned, pending a “misconduct”
investigation.
Nine generals and flag officers have been relieved of duty under Obama just
this year – widely viewed as an extraordinary number – and several sources put the total number of senior
officers purged during the five years of the Obama administration as close to 200.
In response, prominent retired generals – ranging from Army Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely, a Fox News senior
military analyst, to Lt. Gen. William G. Boykin, a founder of the Army’s elite Delta Force, to Medal of Honor
recipient Maj. Gen. Patrick Henry Brady – have all gone on the record with WND, characterizing Obama’s actions as nothing less than an all-out
attack on America’s armed forces.
Obama is traitorously attempting to emasculate the U.S. military by
conducting a purge of the top ranks, according to retired Army Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady.
“There is no doubt he (Obama) is intent on emasculating the military and will fire anyone who disagrees with
him,” Brady told WorldNetDaily last week.
Disagreeing on issues such as “homosexuals, women in foxholes, the Obama sequester” will result in early
retirement. In the past year alone nine generals have been purged from the Pentagon’s ranks. “They are purging
everyone” a source told WND.
“Over the past three years, it is unprecedented for the number of four-star generals to be relieved of duty, and
not necessarily relieved for cause,” retired Army Lt. Gen. William G. “Jerry” Boykin told F. Michael Maloof. “I
believe there is a purging of the military,” he added. “The problem is worse than we have ever seen.”
Boykin also cited reports indicating 197 military officers had been removed by the Obama administration over the
last five years.
Boykin pointed to the early retirement of Gen. Stanley A.
McChrystal, who criticized the Obama administration. McChrystal was forced to retire after an article penned by
freelance journalist Michael Hastings appeared in Rolling Stone. Hastings later died under mysterious circumstances.
The greatest purge in U.S. military history has delivered a decisive blow to morale and poses a dangerous
weakness to the readiness of troops, warned the U.S. Army’s Chief of Staff, Gen. Raymond Odierno, last month.
Currently there are only two Army brigades — between 7,000 to 10,000 troops — that are rated as combat-ready,
less than one-third required for national security requirements, the General explained. “Right now we have in the
Army two brigades that are trained. That’s it. Two,”
Odierno said in October.
Litmus Test for Firing On American Citizens
In January of this year 2009 Nobel Peace Prize nominee Jim
Garrow told Alex Jones and Infowars he was informed by a top military veteran that the Obama
administration’s “litmus test” for new military leaders hinges on if they will obey orders to fire on U.S.
citizens.
“I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new ‘litmus test’ in
determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders,” Garrow wrote on his Facebook page. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US
citizens or not. Those who will not are being removed.”
During the Clinton administration in the mid-1990s, similar accusations were made after a survey was given to U.S. Marines at the 29 Palms
Marine Corps base in California. The survey allegedly asked the soldiers if they would “fire upon U.S. citizens who
refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the United States government.”
In addition, a former Navy SEAL, Ben Smith, said last month that the Obama administration is asking top brass in the military
if they would be comfortable with disarming U.S. Citizens.
“Going back to the beginning of this administration, I’ve had friends within the community talking about how
they were brought in and questioned with people from more towards the top side and the questioning… where it was
pointing was do you feel comfortable disarming American citizens,” Smith told the Alex Jones Show on October
22.
On October 25, a caller to the Alex Jones Show provided footage shot during a FEMA meeting revealing the mindset
of the government concerning the Second Amendment and the ability of citizens to protect themselves during a civil
emergency. “When the military moves in on your street,” an unidentified official stated during the meeting, “they
are now saying you have no more rights.”
Stalin and Hitler Conducted Political Purges of the Military
Obama’s military purge brings to mind Stalin’s purge between October 1940 and
February 1942 of the Red Army. This purge is part of a larger Soviet historiography that saw the imprisonment and
execution of more than 20,000,000 political enemies by the Soviet secret police and the NKVD.
Stalin and the NKVD were also responsible for purging the Polish military in 1940 and executing around 22,000
officers. Known as the Katyn
massacre, the purge was blamed on Nazi Germany by Stalin. The Russian government denied it was responsible for
the atrocity until 1990.
Other infamous military purges include Hitler’s Night of the Long Knives in 1934. In addition to purging the
street fighting SA faction of the German military after Hitler consolidated power, resulting in murder of Ernst
Röhm and the SA leadership, the operation included liquidating the so-called left-wing Strasserist faction of the
Nazi Party and the wholesale execution of Nazi opponents.
This article was posted: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 at 12:17 pm
LeeAnn report : "DEA Doesn't Want Legal Marijuana Cutting Into Their Illegal Profits"
Drug Smuggling DEA calls Marijuana Legalization 'Reckless and Irresponsible' http://www.infowars.com/drug-smugglin...
The
Purge
The powerful fiction film The Purge, is a near future
window into the choices we have to make.
REACH OUT TO OTHERS
[Help Educate Family And Friends With This Page And The Links Below]
Initially as small as 2–6,000 personnel, the SPFOR’s size “could be increased by
augmenting it with additional federal, state, or local police from the United States” as necessary.
One such general, a
recipient of the Medal of Honor, has now gone on record in 
Nine generals and flag officers have been relieved of duty under Obama just
this year – widely viewed as an extraordinary number – and several sources put the total number of senior
officers purged during the five years of the Obama administration as close to 200.
