...Could you understand why I’m upset if the government is trying
to make targets to kill citizens – I don’t feel that’s right,” he responded. Cooper also makes reference to the
DHS’ purchase of 2 billion bullets,
“enough rounds to kill every citizen of the United States five times over.” The shooting targets, intended to
“help the transition for officers who are faced with these highly unusual targets for the first time,” include
“pregnant woman threat,” “older man with shotgun,” “older man in home with shotgun,” “older woman with gun,”
“young school aged girl,” “young mother on playground,” and “little boy with real gun.”
DHS IS TARGETING YOU! MUST-HEAR
DHS Targets Pregnant Women and Children
Why are law enforcement and Homeland
Security buying up targets portraying pregnant women inside their homes, young children and old men with shotguns
as the enemy, all at the same time many states are pursuing gun confiscation? Why does the media continue to
portray constitutionalists and patriots as racist scum?
DHS supplier responds to outrage over
“no hesitation” targets which include children
Paul Joseph Watson
February 20, 2013
Law Enforcement Targets, Inc., a provider of shooting
targets to the Department of Homeland Security, has admitted that targets depicting pregnant women were “requested”
by law enforcement agencies.
Police "Requested" Shooting Targets of Pregnant
Law Enforcement Targets, Inc., a provider of shooting targets to the Department of Homeland
Security, has admitted that targets depicting pregnant women were "requested" by law enforcement agencies.
As you can hear in the YouTube clip above,
Blaine Cooper enquired about the company’s “no hesitation” targets, which also feature children, elderly gun owners
and mothers in playgrounds, and was told that the target showing a pregnant woman was a “requested law enforcement
target for training.”
The representative refused to answer why police would be interested in training to shoot pregnant
women, but went on to explain, “unfortunately our world is made up of people, pregnant or otherwise, that are gun
owners not for the right reasons,” adding that the targets were to “train police officers”.
The woman refused to give her name, accusing Cooper of being “angry.” “Could you understand why I’m
upset if the government is trying to make targets to kill citizens – I don’t feel that’s right,” he responded.
The representative also claims that the targets could be used for “don’t shoot” training, which is
somewhat dubious given that they are called “no hesitation” targets and every single one of them is described as a
“threat” target in the product description.
The shooting targets, intended to “help the transition for officers who are faced with these highly
unusual targets for the first time,” include “pregnant woman threat,” “older man with shotgun,” “older man in home
with shotgun,” “older woman with gun,” “young school aged girl,” “young mother on playground,” and “little boy with
Another customer who called the company claims he was told that the targets were, “strictly for
Department of Homeland Security and other law enforcement agencies.”
Asked by Mike
Riggs at Reason about the targets, the company responded, “The subjects in NMH targets were chosen in
order to give officers the experience of dealing with deadly force shooting scenarios with subjects that are not
the norm during training. I found while speaking with officers and trainers in the law enforcement community that
there is a hesitation on the part of cops when deadly force is required on subjects with atypical age, frailty or
condition (one officer explaining that he enlarged photos of his own kids to use as targets so that he would not be
caught off guard with such a drastically new experience while on duty). This hesitation time may be only seconds
but that is not acceptable when officers are losing their lives in these same situations. The goal of NMH is to
break that stereotype on the range, regardless of how slim the chances are of encountering a real life scenario
that involves a child, pregnant woman, etc. If that initial hesitation time can be cut down due to range
experience, the officer and community are better served.”
The targets are still available for sale on the company’s website via this link (screenshot here).
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is
the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
Contracts were for “training aids” and
Paul Joseph Watson
February 20, 2013
The company behind controversial shooting
targets that include images of children, pregnant women and elderly gun owners received almost $2 million dollars
in contracts from the Department of Homeland Security.
The company reacted to the furore by
asserting the products helped override “hesitation on the part of cops when deadly force is required on subjects
with atypical age, frailty or condition,” and to “break that stereotype on the range, regardless of how slim the
chances are of encountering a real life scenario that involves a child, pregnant woman, etc.”
The vast majority of those contracts were for
“training aids” and
“paperboard,” according to the USASpending.gov website, which lists numerous different contracts each in
the region of $150,000 and $180,000 dollars stretching back to early 2010 and running through to July 2012.
While it is not known whether the DHS purchased the “no hesitation” targets, a company representative
admitted to a customer that law enforcement agencies had “requested” at least one of the images which
depicted a pregnant woman as a “threat”.
A customer who called Law Enforcement Inc. yesterday told Infowars that the company informed him
the targets were, “strictly for Department of Homeland Security and other law enforcement agencies.”
The story has prompted widespread condemnation on the Internet, with Law Enforcement Inc. being
slammed by Facebook
users after it issued a statement.
Retired City of Houston police officer T.F. Stern reacted to the issue by
remarking, “There’s something wrong, seriously wrong here. If we start to desensitize law enforcement officers,
have them disregard humanity, to feel nothing’s wrong in shooting a pregnant lady or an old man with a shotgun
inside his own home…then what kind of society have we become? How will police officers react after they no longer
believe they are part of the society which they have been charged with policing, when they have become used to
shooting pregnant ladies and old men?”
View all the “no hesitation” targets, which are still available on the company’s website, below.
UN Accelerates Plan For Global Gun
Confiscation After Collapse United Nations hiring 'disarmament,
demobilization and reintegration' officers
The United Nations is gearing up for gun
confiscation in the event of a societal collapse in numerous countries by hiring “disarmament, demobilization and
reintegration” officers who will be trained to seize guns “from the civilian population.”
A posting on the
United Nations Career Opportunities page announces a vacancy for the position of “Disarmament,
Demobilization and Reintegration Officer” under the UN’s Department of Peacekeeping Operations based out of New
UN Publicly Prepares For Gun Confiscation In
We know they have been planning it for years, and the documents are legion. Now they are
preparing to go operational.
The UN’s page on DDR operations explains what role the DDR officer
will be expected to undertake;
Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of
small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons from combatants and often from the civilian
Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active
combatants from armed forces and groups, including a phase of “reinsertion” which provides short-term
assistance to ex-combatants.
Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian
status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is a political, social and economic process with an open
time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level.
The objective of the DDR process is to contribute to security and stability in post-conflict
environments so that recovery and development can begin. DDR helps create an enabling environment for political
and peace processes by dealing with security problem that arises when ex-combatants are trying to adjust to
normal life, during the vital transition period from conflict to peace and development.
Although the posting prompted feverish speculation that the UN was about to embark on a mass gun
confiscation program within the United States, it’s important to note that the DDR program is only currently active
in countries like the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ivory Coast and Haiti.
However, concerns are understandable given the acceleration in anti-Second Amendment rhetoric and
executive action on behalf of the Obama administration since the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre.
“It’s no secret that the US government has been preparing riot gear, guns, ammunition, and
detention centers for a
major calamity that will likely involve violence and widespread civil
writes Mac Slavo. Should such an event ever take place the first order of business will include a declaration
of martial law. And just as we saw during Hurricane Katrina, when the U.S. Constitution has been suspended gun
confiscation is soon to follow.”
Since the 1990′s, Alex Jones and Infowars reporters have attended numerous urban warfare training
drills inside the United States, many of which included exercises based around disarming American citizens. Foreign
troops were also present at many of these drills.
Infowars first became aware of this story a week ago having been contacted by active duty military
officials who saw the advertisement before it was posted publicly and we are currently working on a deeper angle
that promises to provide further insight.
For anyone who still doubts that domestic gun confiscation would be plausible in the aftermath of a
catastrophe, watch the short documentary below which highlights how authorities exploited Hurricane Katrina to
seize firearms, including those belonging to residents who weren’t even affected by the disaster.
T.F. Stern, writing on his website The Moral Liberal, states that the cardboard cutouts of pregnant women, children,
and elderly citizens, for police target practice can only have been created by a “sick mind”, with the intention
of having police officers or Homeland Security “goons” completely disregard humanity.
Whether consciously intentional or not, “Maybe it’s the natural progression, a downward spiral of
perversion,” Stern states, the result is to have police “feel nothing’s wrong in shooting a pregnant lady or an
old man with a shotgun inside his own home.”
The company that produced the images, Law Enforcement Training Inc., even admitted this much, asserting the products helped override “hesitation on the part of
cops when deadly force is required on subjects with atypical age, frailty or condition,” and to “break that
stereotype on the range, regardless of how slim the chances are of encountering a real life scenario that
involves a child, pregnant woman, etc.”
“Law enforcement officers train for the ‘what if scenarios’; robbers, burglars or just ‘bad guys’
in general.” Stern states in his column. “While it is possible to run up against other situations where extreme
violence must be confronted, why train police officers… to shoot a pregnant lady holding a gun, an old man with
a shotgun inside his house or a young mother on a playground?” the retired officer asks.
“What does it say about the mindset of an entire police department that trains for such an
event…trains for it as if it were a common every day event rather than the exception which might happen once in
a ‘blue moon’.” Stern urges.
Stern notes, as we did in our original reports, that the images were produced only because there
was a demand for them from law enforcement. In our latest article we note that Law Enforcement Training Inc. has racked up contracts worth almost $2 million dollars mainly for “training aids” and
“paperboard,” with the DHS over the last three years.
“There’s something wrong, seriously wrong here.” Stern states, adding that police are being trained
to essentially become domestic standing armies.
“How will police officers react after they no longer believe they are part of the society which
they have been charged with policing, when they have become used to shooting pregnant ladies and old men?” he
“Odd as it may sound coming from an old retired cop, if police recognition skills, the red flags
that alert to danger were delayed for a moment, so be it; I’d rather get shot than develop the attitude that all
or even most of my neighbors were a constant threat.” Stern further notes.
As we have noted, The story has hit a nerve following multiple accounts documenting The Department
of Homeland Security’s purchase of around 2 billion bullets over the last year, which many fear is linked to
preparations for domestic disorder.
Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’
Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of
Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from
Nottingham Trent University.
This article was posted: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 at 11:27 am
A former Marine Corps Colonel who was stationed
in Fallujah and trained Iraqi soldiers warns that the Department of Homeland Security is working with law
enforcement to build a “domestic army,” because the federal government is afraid of its own citizens.
In this exclusive in studio interview Ret. Col Martino covers the DHS buildup and solutions our overreaching
corrupt government officials.
Second massive ammunition buy this year fuels fears of
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Monday, August 13, 2012
federal authorities are preparing for mass civil unrest have increased after it was revealed that the Department of
Homeland Security is planning to buy a further 750 million rounds of ammo in addition to the 450 million rounds of
hollow point bullets already purchased earlier this year.
A solicitation originally issued by the
DHS in April but updated on Friday calls on suppliers to provide a plethora of different types of ammunition,
including 357 mag rounds that are able to penetrate walls.
The PDF file for the solicitation lists the
different units of ammo required by the thousand, with the total ammo purchase exceeding 750 million
“The Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC), Glynco, Georgia
anticipates awarding multiple award indefinite delivery and indefinite quantity (IDIQ) firm fixed price (FFP)
contracts for commercial leaded training ammunition (CLTA) of various calibers for law enforcement officer firearms
training courses at the following FLETC facilities Glynco, GA, Artesia, NM, Cheltenham, MD and Charleston, SC and
to other Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agencies. The Government guarantees a minimum of 1,000 rounds per
year on each resultant contract. Contracts will be for a base year and four (4) 12 month option periods,” states
Potential suppliers are required to respond to the solicitation
before August 20.
The purchase comes in addition to an order for 450 million rounds of
.40-caliber hollow point bullets which wasfulfilled by Alliant Techsystems Inc. back in March, news greeted by some
as an indication that the DHS was arming itself in preparation to go
to war with the American people.
Although the ammo purchases are ostensibly earmarked for training
purposes, the DHS has been reticent to clarifywhy such an
unusually large amount of rounds are necessary and why such powerful bullets are required merely for training
This has led to speculation that the purchases are connected to
confirmed preparations for civil unrest in the United States.
On page 20 of the manual, rules regarding the use of “deadly force” in confronting
“dissidents” are made disturbingly clear with the directive that a, “Warning shot will not be fired.”
The manual includes lists of weapons to be used against “rioters” or
“demonstrators,” including “antiriot grenades.” It also advises troops to carry their guns in the “safe port arms”
stance, a psychological tactic aimed at “making a show of force before rioters.” Non-lethal weapons and water
cannons are also included.
The increasing likelihood of a
full blown financial collapse in the coming months has also spurred
federal agencies and the U.S. Army to hone their preparations for domestic disorder on a scale greater than riots
witnessed in Europe over the past two years.
A 2008 report produced by the U.S. Army War College’s Strategic
Institute warned that the United States may experience massive civil unrest in the wake of a series of crises which
it termed “strategic shock.”
“Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense
establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security,” stated the
report, authored by [Ret.] Lt. Col. Nathan Freir, adding that the military may be needed to quell “purposeful
National Weather Service Makes Huge Ammo
Nashville Police Stockpile Weapons Of War Items include grenade launchers
by Ben Hall | NewsChannel5.com | July 20, 2014
NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- A massive military build-up is underway
right here in Tennessee.
Local law enforcement agencies are snatching up huge amounts of weapons -- from the Department of
Defense -- used in fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Items include grenade launchers, mine-resistant vehicles and guns that have been deemed as surplus
by the Pentagon.
The equipment is cheap or free for local law enforcement agencies to acquire.
The federal program has fueled a debate about the militarization of our police departments.
McMinn County is located in the foothills of the Appalachian Mountains. It boasts beautiful
scenery, but its sheriff's department can boast something else.
The department received more military surplus guns than any other local department in the state
"We actually reconfigured the whole armory to accommodate all of this," said Sheriff Joe Guy.
Sheriff Guy oversees 31 officers and investigators, but his department received 161 army rifles and
pistols, including 71 M16 rifles and 71 .45-caliber pistols.
NewsChannel 5 Investigates asked, "Why does your department need all these guns?"
Sheriff Guy responded, "Well, we don't need this many. There was a little error in the order."
The Sheriff said the Army surplus program doubled his initial order, but he hasn't sent the guns
"They're here as our department grows. We'll have additional firearms for future officers," Sheriff
McMinn County is not alone.
A spreadsheet obtained by NewsChannel 5
Investigates shows thousands of pieces of military equipment going to Tennessee law enforcement agencies.
Equipment used to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan is now going to local departments.
"The way this stuff is being distributed, it's kind of reckless," said author Radley Balko.
He has written a book, Rise of the Warrior Cop, that raises concerns about militarization of
American police departments.
"What we've seen is just a massive transfer of gear, guns, vehicles and other weaponry," Balko
Law enforcement agencies can go to a website administered by the Department of Defense and look for
On the day we went to McMinn County, the department was looking for Humvees. Sheriff Guy reviewed
what was available.
"It looks good," Sheriff Guy said to an employee who was looking up a vehicle on-line.
The employee responded, "It's got 14-hundred miles on it."
"How many of those did you put in for?" Sheriff Guy asked.
"Three," his employee answered.
Sheriff Guy responded, "Three of those and one truck."
Departments pay a registration fee, then all the equipment is free. Individual departments must pay
for transportation and maintenance.
"The disbursement across the country is so uneven and random and sort of based on who is good at
manipulating the system," Balko said.
Thirty Tennessee departments just received mine-resistant vehicles. They were designed to protect
soldiers from road side bombs in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Lebanon Public Safety, La Vergne and Hendersonville Police Departments all received MRAPS.
"This is our newest armored protective vehicle," said Mike Justice with Lebanon Public Safety.
Justice hopes Lebanon police officers never use it.
"The situations we would use this vehicle in is hostage negotiations, putting this vehicle between
the bad guy and the good guys," Justice said.
He said the surplus program is critical to smaller departments. It provides equipment is not just
military in nature including trucks, lawn mowers and tents.
Many small departments could not afford them on their own.
"As a taxpayer, I paid for it the first time. When I paid my federal income tax, I paid for this
vehicle. So the citizens of Lebanon now get the benefit from it," Justice said standing beside the MRAP.
But Balko said the militarization of police departments comes at a price, like more SWAT raids.
"What we've done is encourage the police to become more like the military," Balko said.
"When you surround yourself with the weapons of war, with the language of war, you're going to be
much less likely to look for ways of resolving disputes using the least amount of force possible," Balko
Our investigation also found some departments can't keep up with the weapons they're getting.
The Tennessee Highway Patrol reported two M14s missing last year.
A TWRA park ranger had an M16 stolen from his vehicle -- it was later recovered.
And at the tiny Bean Station Police Department in East Tennessee, the police chief's son took an
M16 from the program and was arrested for impersonating a police officer.
"It's concerning that this stuff is getting lost or stolen because I think it again indicates how
little monitoring the Pentagon is doing once this stuff gets out of their reach," Balko said.
Sheriff Guy keeps his guns locked up and knows where each one is.
But for some, a department with five times more guns than patrol officers raises questions about
the military surplus program.
"There was never any sort of public debate on this, or public discourse. It all sort of happened
under the radar, and I think that's concerning," Balko said.
Late Thursday, the Department of General Services told NewsChannel 5 Investigates that it has
suspended the state coordinator of the Law Enforcement Support Office (LESO).
Elbert Baker is on administrative leave with pay. The Department of General Services stated it
discovered that it had given inaccurate and incomplete information to NewsChannel 5 Investigates.
We had asked for documentation involving missing weapons in the LESO program.
The state has alerted its auditors and is conducting a review of LESO files, records and internal
controls, a spokesperson said. The auditors have notified the comptroller's office they are investigating a
possible internal deficiency.
Finally, the Department of General Services expressed thanks to NewsChannel 5 Investigates for
bringing "to light a record-keeping deficiency of which our department was previously unaware."
THE GOVT HASN'T LIED ABOUT AMMO PURCHASES
AND HOW THEY'LL BE USED...RIGHT?
The first rule of the drone program is
that you do not talk about the drone program
Feb 25, 2013
In a rare admission, Robert Gibbs, the former White House
Press Secretary under Obama, told reporters Sunday that he was ordered to act as if there was no such thing as an
active US drone program.
“When I went through the process of becoming press secretary, one of the first things they told me was, you’re
not even to acknowledge the drone program,” Gibbs said on MSNBC’s “Up With Chris Hayes” this past weekend.
Gibbs said that he was told “You’re not even to discuss that it exists.”
Noting that the notion was “inherently crazy”, Gibbs said “You’re being asked a question based on reporting of a
program that exists.”
“So you’re the official government spokesperson acting as if the entire program—pay no attention to the man
behind the curtain.” Gibbs, who was Press Secretary between 2009 and 2011, said.
Gibbs stated that he expects the drone program to remain secret for the most part, despite moves in Congress to
force more transparency.
“I have not talked to him about this, so I want to be careful,” Gibbs said, “but I think what the president has
seen is, our denial of the existence of the program when it’s obviously happening undermines people’s confidence
overall in the decisions that their government makes.”
While the program itself remains classified, it is no secret that Obama has vastly expanded the US drone war
since entering office in 2009. Daily drone strikes are raining down on Yemen, Pakistan and Afghanistan, as well as
A recent report released by Washington based think tank, The New America Foundation
revealed that the number of secret US drone strikes in Yemen almost tripled in 2012, compared to 2011.
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, has found that at least 171 civilians, including 35 children, have been
slaughtered in Yemen by secret US drone strikes over the past ten years.
Communications released by WikiLeaks in 2010 revealed that the US and Yemen have repeatedly attempted to cover
up the use of US warplanes to bombard Yemen.
Last week it was announced that despite the fact that drone strikes have killed thousands of innocent civilians
in Yemen and Pakistan, the Pentagon is to reward drone operators with medals.
The DoD is creating a new ribbon, called the Distinguished Warfare Medal that will be awarded for “extra
achievement” related to a military operation. This will encompass sitting at a computer console and pressing a
button to release Hellfire missiles from Predator drones hundreds and thousands of miles away.
The medal will become the fourth-highest ranking combat decoration, placing above the Bronze Star.
Despite the official secrecy, the president has referred to the drone program several times in public, as have
officials such as counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan.
Last year, the New York Times ran a major piece on the program revealing that the White House
has asserted the right to carry out state-sponsored assassination anywhere in the world without having to
provide any evidence or go through any legal process.
The administration merely has to state that the target is
a terrorist and it doesn’t matter whether they are an American citizen or not, as we saw in the case of American-born Anwar al-Awlaki and his son, who were both killed last year.
In December of last year, Obama administration lawyers reaffirmed their backing for state sponsored
assassination, claiming that “U.S. citizens are legitimate military targets” and do not have the right to any
legal protection against being marked for summary execution.
During a CBS 60 Minutes interview in January, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta
revealed that Obama himself personally approves the policy to kill American citizens suspected of terrorism
without trial on a case by case basis.
Perhaps the real reason that the administration wants the details of the programme kept under wraps is that, as
reported by Propublica recently, the programme is potentially much bigger in scope than
anyone had previously thought.
The administration’s figures do not add up, they are chock full of contradictions and discrepancies, and there
can be little doubt that there have been many many more civilian deaths as a result of drone attacks than have been
Akram, who noted that US drone strikes had killed more than 1,000 civilians in Pakistan, also said “We find the
use of drones to be totally counterproductive in terms of succeeding in the ‘war against terror’. It leads to
greater levels of terror rather than reducing them.
Many also contend that the attacks infringe the national sovereignty of Pakistan and constitute an act of
a report by Washington think tank The New America Foundation found that 32% of the more than
1,200 people killed since 2004 in Pakistan, or around 1 in 3, were innocent bystanders rather than dangerous
Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of
Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from
Nottingham Trent University.
This article was posted: Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:00 am
My topic for this evening is “now, it’s assassinations”. What have
we allowed ourselves to become? Are we no longer a nation of laws? Have we become instead a nation of men who make
secret arrests? Are secret prisons now simply another tool of the federal government law enforcement? Is secret
rendition of individuals now permitted out of misplaced fear? Have we decided that the writ of habeas corpus is not
worth defending? Is torture now an acceptable tool for making us safe?
Unfortunately, the single answer to all these questions from the
leaders of our country to many of our citizens appears to be yes. And now we are told that assassination of
foreigners as well as American citizens is legitimate and necessary to provide security for our people. It is my
firm opinion that nothing could be further from the truth.
Secret arrests, secret renditions, torture and assassinations are
illegal under both domestic and international law. These activities should be anathema to the citizens of a
constitutional republic. The real threat doesn’t arise from our failure to torture, rather desensitizing our nation
to the willful neglect and sacrifice of our civil liberties fought and died for over the centuries, is the
An independent agency of the United States government responsible for
collecting and coordinating intelligence and counterintelligence activities abroad in the national
interest; headed by the Director of Central Intelligence under the supervision of the President and
National Security Council...There has been considerable criticism of the CIA relating to security
and counterintelligence failures, failures in intelligence analysis, human rights concerns,
external investigations and document releases, influencing public opinion and law enforcement, drug
trafficking, and lying to Congress. In 1987, the former CIA Station Chief in Angola in 1976, John
Stockwell, said the CIA is responsible for tens of thousands of covert actions and destablization
programs since it was created by Congress with the passage of the National Security Act of
1947.At the time, Stockwell estimated that over 6
million people had died in CIA covert actions.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is a governmental agency
belonging to the United StatesDepartment of Justice that serves as both a federal criminal
investigative body and an internal intelligence agency (counterintelligence). Also, it is the
government agency responsible for investigating crimes on Indian reservations in the United States
under the Major Crimes Act. The branch has investigative jurisdiction over violations of more than
200 categories of federal crime. The agency was established in 1908 as the Bureau of Investigation
(BOI). Its name was changed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 1935. The agency
headquarters is the J. Edgar Hoover Building, located in Washington, D.C. The agency has fifty-six
field offices located in major cities throughout the United States, and more than 400 resident
agencies in lesser cities and areas across the nation. More than 50 international offices called
"legal attachés" exist in U.S. embassies and consulates general worldwide.
'Federal Bureau of Investigation organizes almost
all terror plots in the US' ...The report reveals that the FBI regularly infiltrates communities
where they suspect terrorist-minded individuals to be engaging with others. Regardless of their
intentions, agents are sent in to converse within the community, find suspects that could
potentially carry out “lone wolf” attacks and then, more or less, encourage them to do so. By
providing weaponry, funds and a plan, FBI-directed agents will encourage otherwise-unwilling
participants to plot out terrorist attacks, only to bust them before any events fully
How could there be aWar on Terror and actually say that we're having
awar against terrorism, and leave the
borders wide open? If you were the President of the United States, or I were the President of the United States,
and9/11 really happened the way they
want us to believe it happened, the first thing you would do is shut down the borders, so people couldn't get in
the country to harm you. But they left the borders wide open. Becausethe bankers want the borders open, because they want
aone-world government. They
want a North American Union. They don't want borders
here.9/11 was only a manifestation.
It was done to create afear in the
American public, so that we willobey what they want us to do.
In 1991, the Club published The First Global
Revolution. It analyses the problems of humanity, calling these collectively or in essence the 'problematique'. It
notes (laments) that, historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by enemies in common:
"The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome domestic failure
and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself - when things
become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face
an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the
traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those
whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so used to classifying its
neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and
public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new
THE GLOBALISTSMOVE FROM THEIRALQAEDA
CREATION,TO FABRICATING HOMEGROWN DOMESTIC
A failed attempt to recruit Aaron Russo resulted in recent
light being shed on the CFR...And The Fake War On Terror!
ago, after his popular video “Mad As Hell” was released and Aaron Russo began his campaign to become
Governor of Nevada, Russo was noticed by Nicholas Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney. Seeing
Russo’s passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the
elite’s CFR. Watch the full interview here: Reflections and
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And
The Fake War On Terror!
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And The Fake War On
Alexander Solzhenitsyn was born in Russia, DECEMBER 11, 1918. He
was arrested for writing a letter criticizing Stalin and spent 11 years in labor camps. He began writing and
eventually received the Nobel Prize for Literature.
REACH OUT TO OTHERS
[Help Educate Family And Friends With This Page And The Links Below]