[Arms Transfer Treaty (ATT) ] would create a global registry of private ownership of
firearms. This treaty — which would also mandate creation of a national collection agency for those guns and is
contrary to the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment
THE UN AGENDA :CIVILIAN DISARMAMENT
WATCH THE FULL PRESENTATION AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE
-- THE U.N. DECEPTION --
The UN Sets Its Sights On American Gun
Published on Dec 9, 2014
Alex Jones talks with Alex Newman about the coming UN small arms treaty and what it
UN Accelerates Plan For Global Gun
Confiscation After Collapse United Nations hiring 'disarmament,
demobilization and reintegration' officers
The United Nations is gearing up for gun
confiscation in the event of a societal collapse in numerous countries by hiring “disarmament, demobilization and
reintegration” officers who will be trained to seize guns “from the civilian population.”
A posting on the
United Nations Career Opportunities page announces a vacancy for the position of “Disarmament,
Demobilization and Reintegration Officer” under the UN’s Department of Peacekeeping Operations based out of New
UN Publicly Prepares For Gun Confiscation In
We know they have been planning it for years, and the documents are legion. Now they are
preparing to go operational.
The UN’s page on DDR operations explains what role the DDR officer
will be expected to undertake;
Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of
small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons from combatants and often from the civilian
Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active
combatants from armed forces and groups, including a phase of “reinsertion” which provides short-term
assistance to ex-combatants.
Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian
status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is a political, social and economic process with an open
time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level.
The objective of the DDR process is to contribute to security and stability in post-conflict
environments so that recovery and development can begin. DDR helps create an enabling environment for political
and peace processes by dealing with security problem that arises when ex-combatants are trying to adjust to
normal life, during the vital transition period from conflict to peace and development.
Although the posting prompted feverish speculation that the UN was about to embark on a mass gun
confiscation program within the United States, it’s important to note that the DDR program is only currently active
in countries like the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ivory Coast and Haiti.
However, concerns are understandable given the acceleration in anti-Second Amendment rhetoric and
executive action on behalf of the Obama administration since the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre.
“It’s no secret that the US government has been preparing riot gear, guns, ammunition, and
detention centers for a
major calamity that will likely involve violence and widespread civil
writes Mac Slavo. Should such an event ever take place the first order of business will include a declaration
of martial law. And just as we saw during Hurricane Katrina, when the U.S. Constitution has been suspended gun
confiscation is soon to follow.”
Since the 1990′s, Alex Jones and Infowars reporters have attended numerous urban warfare training
drills inside the United States, many of which included exercises based around disarming American citizens. Foreign
troops were also present at many of these drills.
Infowars first became aware of this story a week ago having been contacted by active duty military
officials who saw the advertisement before it was posted publicly and we are currently working on a deeper angle
that promises to provide further insight.
For anyone who still doubts that domestic gun confiscation would be plausible in the aftermath of a
catastrophe, watch the short documentary below which highlights how authorities exploited Hurricane Katrina to
seize firearms, including those belonging to residents who weren’t even affected by the disaster.
The Untold Story of Gun Confiscation After
Your Guns Are Being Taken And You Don't Even Know
UN Demands All Americans Be
The UN general assembly has overwhelmingly approved the first treaty regulating the
multibillion-dollar international arms trade, a goal sought for more than a decade to try to keep illicit weapons
out of the hands of terrorists, insurgent fighters and organised crime.
The resolution was approved by a vote of 154 to three with 23 abstentions. As the numbers appeared on the
electronic board, loud cheers filled the assembly chamber.
A group of treaty supporters sought a vote in the 193-member world body after Iran, North Korea and Syria blocked
its adoption by consensus at a negotiating conference on Thursday. The three countries voted "no" at Tuesday's
The United Nations is
polishing up a global Arms Transfer Treaty (ATT) this month in a New York convention that would create a global
registry of private ownership of firearms. This treaty — which would also mandate creation of a national collection
agency for those guns and is contrary to the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment — has the long-standing
and enthusiastic backing of the Obama State Department, headed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
“Conventional arms transfers are a crucial national security concern for the
United States, and we have always supported effective action to control the international transfer of arms,”
Hillary Clintonnotedas early as October 14, 2009. Clinton boasted
that “the United States regularly engages other states to raise their standards and to prohibit the transfer or
transshipment of capabilities to rogue states, terrorist groups, and groups seeking to unsettle regions.” Of
course, that speech was delivered at the same time the Obama administration was transferring some 2,000 small arms
to Mexican drug gangs in the “Fast and Furious” gun-walking
The State Department website nevertheless absurdly continues
United States has in place an extensive and rigorous system of controls that most agree is the ‘gold standard’
of export controls for arms transfers.”
In view of such obviously false public statements, one may question the sincerity
of Obama State Department promises about “redlines” to
the UN ATT, which supposedly protect the Second Amendment: “The Second Amendment to the Constitution must be
upheld. There will be no restrictions on civilian possession or trade of firearms otherwise permitted by law or
protected by the U.S. Constitution. There will be no dilution or diminishing of sovereign control over issues
involving the private acquisition, ownership, or possession of firearms, which must remain matters of domestic
law.” The Obama State Department also promises “There will be no mandate for an international body to enforce an
So America’s Second Amendment rights are safe, right?
Thedraftof the treaty
prepared earlier this year by the UN Preparatory Committee (PrepCom) explains that the treaty is aimed at crime
control as well as rogue militias in developing nations:
The majority of conflict deaths are caused by the use of small arms, and civilian
populations bear the brunt of armed conflict more than ever. Also, small arms are the dominant tools of criminal
The PrepComreportof February
2012 — despite protestations by the Hillary Clinton’s minions — is not limited merely to international transfer
of firearms. The draft treaty covers “transfers” as well as imports and exports of firearms:
The international transactions or activities covered by this Treaty include those
listed below and defined in Annex A:
In this matter, the 2012 conference is merely following the goals of the 2001
UNProgramme of Action on small arms, which required national gun registries and collection agencies for those
guns once they’ve been registered. The 2001 Programme
of Action requires nations:
To ensure that comprehensive and accurate records are kept for as long as possible
on the manufacture, holding and transfer of small arms and light weapons under their jurisdiction. These records
should be organized and maintained in such a way as to ensure that accurate information can be promptly retrieved
and collated by competent national authorities.
To develop and implement, where possible, effective disarmament, demobilization
and reintegration programmes, including the effective collection, control, storage and destruction of small arms
and light weapons…
The UN is still seeking this kind of broad control over private firearms
ownership, and UN General Assembly resolution 66/47, adopted December 2, 2011 in advance of this month’s conference that it seeks to ban “The
illicit trade in small arms and light weapons in all its
aspects.” [Emphasis added]
Moreover, the 2012 PrepComreportuses broad
bans on any transfer of firearms:
A State Party shall not authorize a transfer of conventional arms if there is a
substantial risk that those conventional arms would: Be used in a manner that would seriously undermine peace and
security or provoke, prolong or aggravate internal, regional, subregional or international instability.
Some 56 or more U.S. senators have written a letter to President Obama and
Secretary of State Clinton opposing the UN global gun registry, according to the National Rifle Association.
Senatorial opposition began with a July 26, 2011 letterclaimingthat “the
establishment of any sort of international gun registry that could impede upon the privacy rights of law-abiding
gun owners is a non-starter.”
The State Departmentpolicyon
Conventional Weapons Destruction suggests: “The proliferation of illicit conventional weapons, including small
arms and light weapons (SA/LW), in regions of the world suffering from political instability and violent
conflict has proven a major obstacle to peace, economic development, and efforts to rebuild war-torn societies.
In places like Afghanistan, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Sudan, and Colombia, thousands of innocent civilians have
been killed and tens of thousands more displaced by ethnic and civil conflicts perpetuated in large part by easy
access to illicit conventional weapons, particularly SA/LW.”
Many of the countries listed by State Department officials are the very
nations that most need “illicit” small arms to fight back against genocidal governments. “Illicit” is the new
globalist jargon for “illegal,” though in most instances the sparse “illegal” weapons around the world are the ones
that are being used by victims to shoot back against genocidal governments. This is certainly the case
inSyria today, where perfectly legal small arms in the hands of the government are crushing a
largely disarmed civilian population. It was also recently the case in the genocide in South Sudan, which
recently won independence from Sudan — ending the genocide — after using “illicit” small arms in an independence
Since the UN has traditionally backed genocidal governments over the victims who
use “illicit” guns to defend themselves, it’s not surprising that human rights violatorIran is one of several regional
chairmenof the UN ATT convention.
U.S. to Surrender Military Control
to UN While Disarming Americans!
U.S. to Surrender Military Control to UN While Disarming
Alex also talks with Bernadine Smith, the founder of the Second Amendment Committee, a
nationwide organization working to make sure the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights is upheld as the supreme
protective law for firearms of law-abiding people. Smith also authored legislation to restore the militia system to
its proper role as designed by the framers of the Constitution. http://www.libertygunrights.com/index... http://www.americandeception.com/inde...
Did You Know a Law Is On The Books to Disarm All
Law provides impetus for "ultimate world
disarmament" and U.N. control over military
Public law 87-297, the Arms Control and Disarmament
Act signed by President Kennedy in 1961, provides an impetus to not only ban civilian firearm ownership
but to also transfer control of the U.S. military to the United Nations.
“It is the purpose of this Act to provide impetus toward this goal by creating a new agency of peace to deal
with the problem of reduction and control of armaments looking toward ultimate world disarmament,” the law
The law was based primarily on State Department
Publication 7277, The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World,
which advocates the complete disarmament of every country in favor of a permanent U.N. military force:
DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES
The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to
common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world
which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which
adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives
toward which nations should direct their efforts:
The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form
whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace
The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the
means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining
The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of
disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations;
The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework
of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.
“The right to own, buy, sell, trade, or transfer all means of armed resistance, including handguns, is denied to
civilians by [Article 2] of the Arms Trade Treaty,” wrote Joe Wolverton II of the New American. “Article 3 places the ‘ammunition/munitions fired, launched or delivered
by the conventional arms covered under Article 2′ within the scope of the treaty’s prohibitions, as well.”
In the video below, Alex Jones highlights how the
Guardian Centers video is yet another startling indication that authorities in the United States are preparing for
civil unrest as America increasingly begins to resemble a militarized police state.
This has reached the point where it has ceased to be a domestic issue. The world cannot stand
The UN has been working for a long time on tactics to disarm and control Americans. The purpose of the UN Arms
Trade Treaty (UN-ATT) is to regulate the transfer of guns. That obviously requires that all guns be registered and
tracked by governments — which is really about registering and tracking gun owners.
To get the ATT ratified, a watered down version is offered as a Trojan Horse with just a passing reference to
“small arms”. Once it’s ratified, it can easily be changed and expanded with only 75% of UN countries voting for
changes. That won’t be difficult considering it passed nearly unanimously, with only 3 countries (Iran, Syria and
North Korea) voting against.
FALSE FLAGS & PUBLIC OPINION
The history of the UN-ATT is intertwined with false flags.
Fast & Furious was supposed to lay the groundwork to scare the public about arms crossing the border. Even the
NY Times pointed out that the purpose of our government shipping guns to Mexico in the “Gunwalker” programs was to
scare the public about arms moving across borders and get the public to cry out for protection. And the UN-ATT was
the legislation they had already prepared to offer as a solution.
The UN-ATT was originally scheduled for a vote last July. But Fast & Furious had been exposed and was in
full blown controversy because the GOP wanted to use it for political gain — not because they wanted to end the
BATF abuses or send anyone to jail for criminal behavior. The “Gunwalker” programs had been run under Bush prior to
Exactly one week before the UN was to vote on the UN-ATT, the Aurora, CO shooting was staged to try to energize
gun control, take away attention from Fast & Furious and get American public opinion to support UN-ATT
The history of the UN-ATT is intertwined with false flags.
I was at the UN that week covering it for a
pro-Second Amendment organization. There were a couple of groups demonstrating for passage and the corporate media
was in full court press calling for gun control. But the Feds didn’t get the traction from Aurora that they needed
thanks to the authentic media. So they decided to wait until after the US election and even made public statements
to that effect. If Obama lost, it would be done after election but before the new President took office.
Within hours of Obama winning re-election and the Senate Democrats increasing in numbers, they announced that
they wouldn’t do it in the lame duck session after all but in the spring. The Sandy Hook shooting took place Dec 15
and for 3 months Sandy Hook and gun control were the corporate media’s theme. Then the UN passed the Arms Trade
Treaty on April 2.
Constitutionally, it doesn’t matter that the Secretary of State signed the treaty. President Clinton’s Secretary
of State, Madeline Albright, signed another terrible UN treaty — the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child,
attacking the family — back in 1995. It never got any farther.
If Obama signs the treaty it still has to be ratified by the Senate. But it’s important to note that the
Constitution doesn’t require 2/3 of the Senate to approve — only 2/3 of those PRESENT have to sign
it. Will Harry Reid schedule a vote during a recess to get it ratified?
TREATIES DON’T CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION
Treaties don’t amend the Constitution but neither does regulatory law. However, the Feds act as if both do. Once
the government passes a “law” or “regulation”, they enforce it. Citizens can fight them in court, but even when
governments lose, it’s not uncommon for them to ignore the court decision. Washington, DC ignores the fact that the
Supreme Court struck down their gun laws 5 years ago in DC v Heller. And
court decisions striking down laws against photographing cops are being ignored across the country.
he feared US civilians “do not know us” while the military had become increasingly
McChrystal went on to say something very telling:
“Serious action is necessary. Sometimes we talk about very limited actions on the
edges and I just don’t think that’s enough.”
“Very limited action around the edges” is exactly what “infringement” is. But not content with infringement,
McChrystal is calling for more “serious action” implying, he’s ready to move on to confiscation. Clearly McChrystal
& Mullen have no respect for the constitutional prohibition of a standing army and reject the constitutional
prescription of a citizen militia like Switzerland.
The Founders used the term “shall not be infringed” in the Second Amendment because they knew that arms could
never be confiscated from the people unless it was a gradual infringement, gradual and “limited actions on the
edges” as McChrystal puts it.
One might ask why they used the term “shall not infringe” rather than “Congress shall pass no law” as in the
First Amendment. If we look at Article 1, Sec 8, we see that Congress had already given authorization to pass laws
that affected the militia. Congress was to organize, arm and call forth the people as a militia, i.e. support and
aid the militia.
There is a clear distinction in the Constitution between a standing army (which was not to be funded for more
than 2 years) and the militia. The militia, not the army, was tasked with “suppressing insurrections and repelling
invasions” according to Article 1, Sec 8, Clause 15. The next clause, Article 1, Sec 8, Clause 16, gave Congress
authority to organize, arm and train the militia and to appoint officers. That was what the term “well regulated”
referred to in the Second Amendment — not the infringement of rights by bureaucratic “regulations”.
The Congress was tasked with arming the militia, not disarming it incrementally. The public’s understanding of
militias and the army has been turned upside down by the schools and the corporate media. To correct it, we need to
understand that a standing army and a national bank were correctly understood by the Founders to be the greatest
threats to our liberties. The Constitution calls for a citizen militia, not a standing professional army, to defend
This article was posted: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 at 3:49 pm
Govt Enforced UN Arms Treaty Bans 3D Printable Gun
On the Thursday, May 9 edition of the Alex Jones Show, 3D printing guru Cody Wilson of
Defense Distributed announced that the US Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, Enforcement Division
(DTCC/END) has sent him a letter requesting the group remove all data supposedly in violation of the Arms Export
Control Act from public access immediately. http://www.infowars.com/breaking-3d-p...
Man shocked by arrest after daughter
draws picture of gun at school
Father Arrested After 4 Year Old Daughter Draws Picture of
Arrested Jessie Sansone was arrested at his daughter's school
after the 4-year-old drew a picture of a gun. Peter Lee, Record staffRelated Stories Gun leading to dad's arrest
was a toy
A plastic toy gun is to blame for the mayhem that saw a man arrested at his daughter's school this week. KITCHENER
— A Kitchener father is upset that police arrested him at his children's' school Wednesday, hauled him down to the
station and strip-searched him, all because his four-year-old daughter drew a picture of a gun at school.
"I'm picking up my kids and then, next thing you know, I'm locked up," Jessie Sansone, 26, said Thursday.
"I was in shock. This is completely insane. My daughter drew a gun on a piece of paper at school."
The school principal, police and child welfare officials, however, all stand by their actions. They said they had
to investigate to determine whether there was a gun in Sansone's house that children had access to.
"From a public safety point of view, any child drawing a picture of guns and saying there's guns in a home would
warrant some further conversation with the parents and child," said Alison Scott, executive director of Family and
Waterloo Regional Police Insp. Kevin Thaler said there was a complaint from Forest Hills public school that "a
firearm was in a residence and children had access to it. We had every concern, based on this information, that
children were in danger."
Their concern wasn't based on the drawing alone, he said.
Neaveh, the child who made the drawing, also made comments about it that raised more flags.
Sansone thinks police overreacted. He didn't find out until hours after his arrest what had actually sparked the
He said he went to the school Wednesday afternoon to pick up his three children. He was summoned to the principal's
office where three police officers were waiting. They said he was being charged with possession of a firearm.
He was escorted from the school, handcuffed and put in the back of a cruiser.
At the same time, other police officers went to his home, where his wife and 15-month-old child were waiting for
They made his wife come to the police station while the other three children were taken to Family and Children's
Services to be interviewed.
The UN global arms treaty was approved by a vote of 154 to three
with 23 abstentions. Photograph: Timothy A Clary/AFP/Getty Images
The UN has voted overwhelmingly to regulate the $70bn global trade in conventional weapons in an attempt
to halt the proliferation of violent conflict and human rights abuses around the world.
The UN general assembly voted by 154 votes to just three to adopt the first Arms Trade Treaty.
The new regulations will bring the gargantuan global business in small arms and light weapons, as
well as tanks, armoured vehicles, military jets, helicopters, battleships and missiles under the same sort
of international controls that have long applied to nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.
Human rights and development groups hailed the decision as a turning point in the prolonged struggle to
counter the damage wrought by an unregulated arms trade. Anna Macdonald, who heads Oxfam's campaigning on
arms control, said "for the first time, we have a legally binding international treaty that will bring
conventional arms under control.
"This is a treaty for the millions of people whose lives have fallen apart because of armed violence
every day, from Guatemala to Kenya, Jamaica, Albania and a whole range of other countries."
Kate Allen, head of Amnesty International UK, called the treaty a milestone that would regulate "the
illegal flow of arms to warlords, tyrants and despots around the world, a treaty that could save the lives
of millions and help prevent conflicts like those in Mali or Sri Lanka ever happening again."
The adoption of the treaty marks an important achievement for the UN itself, which came close to
repeating last year's failure on conventional arms control. In 2012, the collapse in talks was caused
largely by the hesitance of the US, the world's largest arms dealer, which in a presidential election year
was particularly susceptible to pressure domestically from the gun lobby led by the National Rifle
Re-election behind him, President Obama showed no such ambiguity this time, and the US signed up to the
treaty along with other major arms nations such as the UK, France and Germany as well as emerging weapon
trading countries such as South Africa and Brazil. The main threat to achieving an agreement on this
occasion came from three countries that are all under various forms of UN sanctions – Iran, Syria and North
Korea – who blocked adoption of a draft treaty last week and forced the UN to take the issue to the general
assembly for a simple majority vote.
Those three nations were the only ones who voted against the treaty on Tuesday, while 23 abstained
Individual nations will now be asked to ratify the treaty, which would incorporate its terms into each
country's domestic law. Once 50 countries have ratified, the treaty becomes international law.
The weakness of the new provision is that it has no teeth - there is no policing mechanism equivalent to
the international criminal court. But supporters say that the public impact of being seen to act in
violation of international law will act as a significant stick to beat errant nations into changing their
"This is not a panacea, it is not going to solve all problems overnight but it is an important step. We
have seen time and again that international treaties effect the behaviour even of those states who fail to
sign up," Macdonald said.
The US is likely to be among those nations who fail to ratify the treaty. That would require approval by
the US senate and the NRA's enduring opposition to any attempt to regulate the trade in guns is likely to
The NRA's stamp can also be seen in aspects of the treaty itself. The text stresses that each state has
the right to regulate and control conventional arms within its own territory - a response to the NRA's
inaccurate claim that the treaty would be the first step towards a government grab of individual Americans'
guns. Under US pressure, controls over ammunition contained in the draft treaty were also watered down to
remove a requirement on states to record importation of ammunition and to prevent it being diverted to
Once the treaty is effective, UN member nations will have to assess every arms sale under its
jurisdiction to ensure that it does not undermine peace and security or facilitate a violation of
international humanitarian or human rights law. Safeguards against the use of conventional weapons to
foment organised crime or terrorism will also have to be implemented.
Why must all
decent non-violent people fight against "gun control"? Why is the
right to keep and bear arms truly a fundamental individual right? You can find the answers in this new
People frequently ask why we are so dedicated to our cause? This book answers that
question by collecting the key facts and arguments in one place.
People have asked us to present the whole JPFO argument in one place. We have done
it. Available now in an easy-reading format and a handy size, the new book is
entitledDeath by Gun Control: The Human Cost of Victim
The message is simple: Disarmed people are neither free nor safe - they become the
criminals' prey and the tyrants' playthings. When the civilians are defenseless and their government goes bad,
however, thousands and millions of innocents die.
Professor R.J. Rummel, author of the monumental
bookDeath by Government,said: "Concentrated political power is the most dangerous thing on earth." For power to
concentrate and become dangerous, the citizens must be disarmed.
What disarms the citizens? The idea of "gun control." It's the idea that only the
government has the right to possess firearms, and that citizens have no unalienable right to use force to defend
Death by Gun Controlcarefully
examines the "gun control" idea: its meaning, its purposes, its effects. It comes in many forms, but in every form
it enables the evildoers and works against righteous defense.
•Government permit system
•Ban on private ownership
Enemies of the state
Act of Feb. 20, 1951
Act of Oct. 22, 1957
•Prison or death to "counter-revolutionary criminals" and anyone resisting any government
•Death penalty for supply guns to such "criminals"
Mayans & other Indians;
Decree 36, Nov 25 •Act of 1932
Decree 386, 1947
Decree 283, 1964
•Register guns & owners •Licensing with high fees
•Prohibit carrying guns
•Bans on guns, sharp tools
Firearms Ordinance, 1955
Firearms Act, 1970
•Register all guns & owners •Licenses for transactions
•Warrantless searches •Confiscation powers
Art. 322-328, Penal Code
Royal Ordinance 55, 1938
•Licenses for guns, owners, ammunition & transactions
•Photo ID with fingerprints
•License inspected quarterly
Decree-Law No. 12, 1979
•Register guns, owners, ammunition •Owners must justify need •Concealable guns illegal
They Cannot Refute
Death by Gun
Control delivers the essential - and gut wrenching -- truth that the
anti-self defense "gun control" advocates never try to refute. They simply cannot refute the facts or the
Here's the Formula:Hatred +
Government + Disarmed Civilians = Genocide
What makes the argument so powerful? Two factors. First, it makes common sense:
unarmed defenseless people have no hope against armed aggressors. Second, it states the historical truth: evil
governments did wipe out 170,000,000 innocent non-military lives in the 20th Century alone.
Using the facts inDeath by Gun
Control, you can take down the enemies of the Bill of Rights. The
rights-destroyers have no answers to these facts. They have no excuses for their killer ideas.
JPFO's work has already borne fruit. John R. Bolton, an under-Secretary of State
for the United States, this year urged the United Nations to recognize how an "oppressed non-state group defending
itself from a genocidal government" will need ready access to firearms. Mr. Bolton might have been the first U.S.
official in modern history to have argued to the UN that private citizens might need to be armed against their own
Paul Harvey, the world-renowned and much admired radio commentator, last year
reportedly broadcast the JPFO-produced facts linking "gun control" to the genocide of millions of unarmed
civilians. Country by country, Mr. Harvey counted the murdered victims of civilian disarmament policies.
Our new book could inspire other opinion-makers to join the chorus. Chapters in
the book teach about:
The essential meaning of "gun control"
The Genocide Formula
The laws and policies that led to mega murder in Cambodia, China, Nazi
Germany, Guatemala, Rwanda, Ottoman Turkey, Uganda, USSR
Zimbabwe's land invasions and firearms confiscations
Soaring crime in Britain after gun prohibition
Violence and police state polices in Japan
The right and duty of armed self-defense in Judaism and both Protestant and
Racist roots of "gun control" in America
The United Nations program to disarm civilians worldwide
Police state polices that condition Americans to accept victim
Contributors: Leading Lights for
There is much more.Death by Gun
Control features articles contributed by:
James Bovard(Introduction): "Not every firearms regulation
leads inexorably to genocide. ... But there is no trigger guard on political ambition."
Stephen Halbrook, Ph.D.(Chapter
9): How Nazi firearms laws disarmed German Jews -- the whole
10): Retelling the tragic, inspiring tale of The White Rose
Society, college students who paid the ultimate price for freedom of mind.
18): What the Bible says to Christians and Jews about
self-defense and victim disarmament.
Learn how top United Nations proponents exploit small
arms, the environment, and justice to pressure Capitol Hill into quietly surrendering America's heritage of
freedom. Should these UN plans remain unopposed, the consequences are ultimately grim. There is, however, a way to
avert this danger. (2001, 60 min., DVD)
(THIS IS WHY WE HAVE GUNS!)
Warning: Graphic Violence. This
disturbing video clearly demonstrates the consequences of centralizing government power and disarming
citizens.Genocide always follows, leaving millions of innocent victims
Innocents Betrayed - The History of Gun Control - FULL LENGTH
INNOCENTS BETRAYED -- JPFO Production -- 58
minutes - DVD 2003.... This has to be the greatest professional production of the effects of gun control. This
production shows actual footage of gun confiscation and its effects. This is a must video for gun shows.....
"Something is out there. Finding it will change your life. Stopping it will change the world." History's worst
serial killer roams the earth - calculating, methodical, and brutal. The victims - men, women, and children -
numbered 170,000,000 in the 20th century. And the toll is still rising. Tragically, these victims actually depend
upon their killer, they trust the kiler to protect them. But in the end, using laws, edicts, propoganda, and
finally sheer force, the killer renders millions powerless. And destroys them... Horriffic persecution, slavery,
and mass murder engulf nation after nation... Germany, China, Cambodia, Soviet Union, Guatemala, Uganda, Turkey,
Rwanda. No country is safe. Not even the U.S.A. But who is this killer whose victims incomprehensebly outnumber
those of every Bundy, Manson, or Dahmer? And what can you do to help stop the slaughter? Watch "Innocents Betrayed"
and you'll have the lifesaving answers to both questions...... (2003 documentary by Jews For The Preservation of
Firearms Ownership, Inc.) Directed by Aaron Zelman -- Produced by Aaron Zelman & Dr. Ignallus Plazza -- Screen
Play by Claire Wolfe -- Creative Consultant, Richard W. Stevens.
REACH OUT TO OTHERS
[Help Educate Family And Friends With This Page And The Links Below]