Under the “Smart ID” program, all 4,200 students are forced to wear an ID badge
with an RFID tracking chip in it at all times to attend school. Thecontroversial ID badge includes the photo
and name of each student, a barcode tied to the student’s social security number, as well as an RFID chip which
pinpoints the exact location of the individual student, including after hours and when the student leaves
campus...“What we’re teaching kids is that they live in a total surveillance state
and if they do not comply, they will be punished.”
RFID Spy Tags Could Be Used By Pedophiles To Track
Program will allow state and federal agencies to access
January 27, 2014
New York’s new, multi-agency surveillance program will
collect data on public school students, starting from preschool to their entry into the workforce and potentially
throughout their entire lives.
Developed by the New York State Education Department, funded by the
federal government and promoted by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the P-20 data collection program
allows government entities to share and access records for every student in the state with the overall goal of
monitoring individuals from childhood to death.
“By working in collaboration with other state agencies, the New York State Education Dept. will be able to
establish a P-20 data system without duplication of effort and cost,” a U.S. Dept. of Education web site states. “It will allow NYSED and other agencies to link data without the need for
agencies to unnecessarily add new regulations or seek legal policies to collect data out of their purview.”
“In the end, it will provide a more robust state data system.”
New York began development of the P-20 program as early as 2008 and has received over $40 million in federal and
state grants since then, according to USA Today.
The program was named P-20 to indicate the tracking of students from pre-kindergarten to around age 20 when they
enter the workforce.
“Data is painting a profile of a student that is richer and more valuable than ever before,” Jim Shelton, a U.S.
Education Department official who previously worked for the Gates Foundation, said recently.
He also added that the P-20 program leads to “progress.”
Others, however, have pointed out the obvious privacy issues and Orwellian characteristics of this data
“This throws up so many red flags for me as a parent, a tech guy and an
educator,” technology training specialist Brian Wasson said to USA Today. “As this develops, will they decide to use this data for more than research?
“I don’t buy the rationale for it.”
The real reason behind the program is to integrate personal records held by various government departments into
a centralized database which can then be shared and accessed by a multitude of state and federal agencies.
The idea for such a database existed as far back as 2002 when the New York Times reported that the Pentagon wanted to analyze Americans’ educational,
criminal, financial, medical, and travel records in order to profile every citizen in the country.
This goal came to fruition in the past year when the Dept. of Health and Human Services rolled out the
Federal Data Services Hub, a comprehensive database which provides federal entities
real-time, electronic access to dossiers on Americans compiled with information from the IRS, the Dept. of
Homeland Security, the Justice Dept. and others.
No doubt that the records collected under the P-20 program will also eventually appear in this data hub.
This article was posted: Monday, January 27, 2014 at 2:54 pm
The Government Wants Your Children - or What is the
P20 Councils are education data collection boards set up in each state via state
legislation. P stands for Pre-School and 20 stands for 20 years of age - the ages during which public schools
will collect data on students for the state and federal governments to use and share. Each Council determines
how and with whom to share educational data and what data will be collected. In Oklahoma, our P20 Council has
made it known that they wish to collect data from home school students. Why?
'Alarming!' NY state steps up
[Collecting The Data of 3.6 Million
New York state authorities are planning to step-up surveillance - this time, on school
kids. The program, which is to be launched state-wide, is supposed to gather information on students starting
from the age of five. And as RT's Marina Portnaya reports, the move is finding little support among
-- Collecting The Data of 3.6 Million Kids --
The Department of Education is creating a statewide data base: that will include the names, addresses, test scores,
learning disabilities, attendance, and disciplinary records of every single public school student! The data
collection begins at the age of 5yr...
NBC: Your Children Will be Microchipped “Sooner Rather Than
Americans will accept it just as they accepted the
Paul Joseph Watson - May 24, 2016
An NBC News report that promotes the microchipping of
children asserts that it will happen “sooner rather than later” and that Americans will eventually accept the
process as something just as normal as the barcode.
It goes on to highlight mother of three Steffany Rodroguez-Neely, who talks about how she briefly
lost her daughter after she hid behind a rack of clothes, bringing to the fore, “every parent’s nightmare when
you can’t find your child.”
“If it’ll save my kid, there’s no stuff that’s too extreme,” says Rodroguez-Neely. “Micro-chipping
would be an extra layer of protection, if something bad does happen.”
Rodroguez-Neely goes on to explain how she has braved skepticism from members of the local Tampa
Bay Moms Group, people like Kerri Levey, who are wary about implanting their own children.
“You’re putting a battery in your kid, you’re putting a chip in your kid. And, where does it stop,”
asks Levey. “Where? It’s going too far. This is a child we’re talking about.”
“If a small chip the size of a grain of rice could have prevented a tragedy, I think most parents
would have said, I think I would have done it,” responds Rodroguez-Neely.
The piece flips back to pushing the idea when it quotes electronics expert Stuart Lipoff, who
asserts that microchipping children is safe and inevitable.
(Article Continued Below)
FULL NBC BROADCAST PROMOTING MICROCHIPPING CHILDREN
NBC: YOUR CHILDREN WILL BE MICROCHIPPED
“SOONER RATHER THAN LATER”
Published on May 25, 2016
An NBC News report that promotes the microchipping of children asserts that it will
happen “sooner rather than later” and that Americans will eventually accept the process as something just as
normal as the barcode.
It goes on to highlight mother of three Steffany Rodroguez-Neely, who talks about how she briefly lost her daughter
after she hid behind a rack of clothes, bringing to the fore, “every parent’s nightmare when you can’t find your
“If it’ll save my kid, there’s no stuff that’s too extreme,” says Rodroguez-Neely. “Micro-chipping would be an
extra layer of protection, if something bad does happen.”
“People should be aware that testing is being done right now. The military is not only testing this
out, but already utilizes its properties. It’s not a matter of if it will happen, but when,” states Lipoff.
Lipoff also told NBC that people shouldn’t be concerned about “big brother” tracking their children
and that the technology was merely an upgrade on the traditional barcode.
“When barcodes first came out in the late 1960s, people were appalled. They were wary of them and
did not understand the concept. Today, it is so commonplace, we don’t even notice it. A microchip would work
much in the same way,” he states, adding that it will “definitely happen”.
NBC reporter Melanie Michael appears to agree, remarking that the size of the chip is “very very
small” and that “the expert tells us this will happen sooner rather than later.”
“You can bet somewhere someone someday is going to pull this off and we could see those microchips
in everyone,” she adds.
The sheer creepiness of children being treated like barcoded products seems to be lost on
The entire premise of the piece is extremely odd to say the least. Did Rodroguez-Neely approach NBC
with the idea to promote implantable microchips as a way of finding lost children, or is the segment a pure
propaganda blitz to normalize the idea in the minds of the viewers?
Either way, it doesn’t come across as very balanced, aggressively promoting the safety aspect of
the microchip over concerns about its clear Orwellian scope.
Imagine a world of no more privacy. Where
your every purchase is monitored and recorded in a database, and your every belonging is numbered. Where someone
many states away or perhaps in another country has a record of everything you have ever bought, of everything
you have ever owned, of every item of clothing in your closet -- every pair of shoes. What's more, these items
can even be tracked remotely.
Once your every possession is recorded in a database and can be tracked, you can also be tracked and monitored
remotely through the things you wear, carry and interact with every day.
We may be standing on the brink of that terrifying world if global corporations and government agencies have their
way. It's the world that Wal-Mart, Target, Gillette, Procter & Gamble, Kraft, IBM, and even the United States
Postal Service want to usher in within the next ten years.It's the world of radio frequency identification.
Radio frequency identification, RFID for short, is a technology that uses tiny computer chips -- some smaller than
a grain of sand -- to track items at distance. If the master planners have their way, every object -- from shoes to
cars -- will carry one of these tiny computer chips that can be used to spy on you without your knowledge or
consent. We've nicknamed these tiny devices "spychips" because of their surveillance potential.
TECHNOCRACY - A form of government in
which scientists and technical experts are in control "technocracy was described as that society in which those
who govern justify themselves by appeal to technical experts who justify themselves by appeal to scientific
forms of knowledge"
The Roots of Technocracy with Expert Patrick M.
Having lost her appeal, 15 year-old student Andrea
Hernandez is leaving John Jay High School after school officials denied her request to allow her to continue her
“education uninterrupted” by permitting her to use her old (chipless) ID badge which “does not signify
participation in a program which I believe conflicts with my religious beliefs.”
In her handwritten letter, Hernandez writes: “I do not wish to wear the new badge, even without
the RFID chip, because it signifies participation in the program.”
Hernandez, who has been threatened with expulsion for refusing to wear a chipless RFID tracking badge, had her
request for a preliminary injunction denied by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Western District of
Texas. Rutherford Institute attorneys argue the school is violating her rights under Texas’ Religious Freedom Act
and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
School makes good on threat of ‘consequences’ for refusing to
submit to ‘Mark of the Beast’ ID scheme
Aaron Dykes Infowars.com November 19, 2012
After months of protesting a
policy requiring high school students to wear an RFID-enabled ID badge around their necks at all times, Andrea
Hernandez is being involuntarily withdrawn from John Jay High School in San Antonio effective November 26th,
according to a letter sent by the district that has now been made public.
The letter, sent on November 13, informs her father that the
Smart ID program, which was phased in with the new school year, is now in “full implementation” and requires
all students to comply by wearing the location-tracking badges.
Since Andrea Hernandez has refused to wear the badge, she is being withdrawn from
the magnet school and her program at the Science and Engineering Academy, and instead will have to attend William
Howard Taft HS, which is not currently involved in the ID scheme, unless she changes her position.
Civil liberties lawyers at theRutherford Institute told Infowars.com that they are in the process of filing a temporary restraining order
petition to prevent the school from kicking Hernandez out until further appeals can be made to resolve the matter.
Representatives for John Jay did not return calls for comment by the time of publishing.
Andrea, backed by her family, has claimed the policy violates her religious
beliefs and unduly infringes on her privacy. The
controversial ID badge includes the photo and name of each student, a
barcode tied to the student’s social security number, as well as an RFID chip which pinpoints the exact location of
the individual student, including after hours and when the student leaves campus.
The battle over the IDs has been an ongoing saga. The Hernandez family has
previously attended several school board meetings, organized protests and filed formal grievances with the district
over the matter, and has been backed by numerous civil rights advocates.
Infowars reporters covered a protest that took place in early October, following
up with appearances by the Hernandez family on theAlex Jones
Show and theInfowars
Nightly News programs.
Texas Students Treated Like Cattle with Mandatory RFID
In response to public outcry
and pressure from rights groups, the school has offered to remove the battery and chip, but wouldn’t budge on
mandating the ID. Their offer would also require the Hernandez family toend
their criticism and agree to comply with and even tout the policy,
something Andrea’s father Steve Hernandez finds unacceptable.
Steve Hernandez stated, “[A]s part of the accommodation my daughter and I would
have to agree to stop criticizing the program and publicly support … it. I told [the Deputy Superintendent] that
was unacceptable because it would imply an endorsement of the district’s policy and my daughter and I should not
have to give up our constitutional rights to speak out against a program that we feel is wrong.”
Andrea has instead agreed to carry her original ID card, which was issued when she
began at the school, and was told would be valid for her entire four years there.
But she has already been effectively punished for her non-compliance. She was not
allowed to vote for Homecoming King & Queen because she didn’t have the proper identification, and has also
been barred from some school functions. The school originally threatened to suspend, fine, or involuntarily
transfer students who wouldn’t wear the ID once the program was fully instituted.
Deputy Superintendent Ray Galindo vowed in October that
theconsequences would be worse if Andrea did not
change her mind: “I urge you to accept this solution so that your child’s instructional program will not be
affected. As we discussed, there will be consequences for refusal to wear an ID card as we begin to move forward
with full implementation,” Galindo wrote.
Hernandez’ case first madenews back in August, when the school tried to impose the
new technology at the start of the school year. John Jay HS, along with other participating schools, stands to
receive $2 million dollars in state funding for a program supposedly instituted to reduce tardiness and truancy.
However, Hernandez and other students only qualified for the magnet school by having good attendance, grades and
test scores in the first place.
Christian Family Refuses Mandatory RFID Chip at Texas
For many Christian families,
including the Hernandez’, the mandatory policy is eerily close to the predictions of Revelations 13: 16-18, which
warns of the Mark of the Beast:
16 He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free
and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, 17 and that no one may buy or sell
except one who has the mark or[a] the name of the beast, or the number of his name. 18 Here is wisdom. Let
him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is
666.(New King James Version)
As such, the policy has also been considered a violation of the First Amendment to
the Constitution, which guarantees the right to free speech and freedom of religion. Many also consider it to be an
unreasonable and unwarranted violation of privacy, protected under the Fourth Amendment.
Gov’t Bribing School Children with Candy to Wear RFID
This article was posted: Monday, November 19,
2012 at 5:44 pm
A Texas school district has
come under legal fire after a student was expelled for failure to comply with the “School Locator Project,” an RFID
chip tracking program currently being piloted in a San Antonio middle and high school.
John Jay High School sophomore Andrea Hernandez was involuntarily withdrawn after
protesting her school’s tracking badge policy for months. When appeals to respect her rights were repeatedly
ignored, the family decided to fight back, seeking legal council.
In a just-released statement, civil liberties organization The Rutherford
Institute, which represents the Hernandez family, has announced it will immediatelyseek a preliminary injunction against the district to prevent Andrea from being moved to another school.
Under the “Smart ID” program, all 4,200 students are forced to wear an ID badge
with an RFID tracking chip in it at all times to attend school. Due to her persistent refusal, the school’s
administration finally offered Andrea a deal; she would comply with the project by wearing a program badge with the
Not wanting to endorse the program in any way, Andrea refused. On November 13, the
school sent Andrea’s father a letter expelling her because “all students are expected to comply with the Smart ID
This case is quickly setting a precedent that students can be kicked out of school
for not complying with programs they feel violate their rights.
“I feel it is an invasion of my religious beliefs, I feel that it’s the
implementation of the Mark of the Beast, I feel that it’s an invasion of my privacy and an invasion of all my
rights as a citizen,” Andrea said at a school RFID protest shown in an Infowars report below.
“What we’re teaching kids is that they live in a total surveillance state and if
they do not comply, they will be punished,” John Whitehead, constitutional attorney and Rutherford founder said in
a telephone interview with Infowars. “There has to be a point at which schools have to show valid reasons why
they’re doing this.”
Onthe district’s Student Locator Project
website, it notes that “Northside ISD is harnessing the power of radio
frequency identification technology (RFID) to make schools safer, know where our students are while at school,
increase revenues, and provide a general purpose ‘smart’ ID card.” Although the district will pay $500,000 up
front for the program, is expects to garner $1.7 million from the state government in increased attendance
The district’s website also confirms the “smart” student ID cards are just the
newest edition to the school’s surveillance grid.A letter to parents regarding the Smart ID project’s implementation mentions that digital cameras have been
installed in all high and middle schools and all school buses. Whitehead noted that the schools have already
been fitted with 290 surveillance cameras.
In addition, according to the district, the Smart ID will “provide access to the
library and cafeteria” and “allow for the purchase of tickets to the schools’ extracurricular activities,” meaning
students who refuse to comply with the program will not be allowed to access those facilities and activities. The
school also makes the ambiguous statement, “Other uses [for the Smart IDs] will be rolled out during the pilot
As Infowars previously pointed out, in addition to a vast privacy encroachment,
the Hernandez’s feel the program is a direct violation of their Christian religious beliefs, as it bears a striking
resemblance to Revelations 13: 16-18 warning of the Mark of the Beast:
“16. He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to
receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, 17. and that no one may buy or sell except one who
has the mark or[a] the name of the beast, or the number of his name. 18. Here is wisdom. Let him who has
understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666.” (New King
The Student Locator Card program is set to expand to all 112 schools in the San
Antonio Northside Independent School District.
A student’s rights should not end simply because they set foot on school property.
This big brother takeover in our schools is an alarming trend, as it would appear schools are attempting to
condition the youngest members of our society to accept government intrusion into – and control over – their
“Regimes are formulated in the schools. Every dictator – every regime-changer –
has always implemented a dictatorship in the schools first,” Whitehead said. “The ramifications are really ominous:
if you grow up in that environment all your life, it’s normal to you. We’re moving into a total compliance
Over 200 UK state schools
have installed cameras in bathrooms and changing rooms to monitor students, a recent surveillance survey reported.
British parents will likely be shocked by the study’s findings.
The survey is based on a freedom of information request conducted by Big Brother Watch, an anti-surveillance
activist group. The group said they were shaken by the results, which was much higher and more extensive than
The report “will come as a shock to many
parents“, Nick Pickles, Director of Big Brother Watch said.
“Schools need to come clean about why they are using these cameras and
what is happening to the footage”.
- 47,806 cameras used in 2,107 schools - 207 schools have 825 cameras in changing rooms and bathrooms - 90% of schools use CCTV cameras - 54 UK schools have 1 camera or more per 15 pupils - 106,710 CCTV cameras estimated in high schools and academies in England,
Scotland and Wales
A total of 825 cameras were installed in the bathrooms and changing rooms of 207 different schools across
England, Scotland and Wales, according to data provided by more than 2,000 schools.
It remains unclear where in the bathrooms and changing rooms the cameras are
located, who watches the footage and whether any pupils were recorded while changing.
The principal of the Wildern School in southern England, however, said that the
cameras in her school – one per bathroom – are located “nowhere near the
“The images are not looked at unless
there has been a reported problem and all images are deleted after a maximum of 30
days,” she said.
Video recording in toilets or changing rooms is legal, but recommended only for
exceptional circumstances, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) reported. The ICO is an independent
authority in the UK, whose duties include promoting privacy.
Research also showed that the extent of CCTV use varied widely from school to
school. “With some schools seeing a ratio of one camera for every five pupils,” the report said.
“CCTV appears to be used as a quick fix to much more complex problems and
issues that simply cannot be solved with passive surveillance.”
UK schools so unsafe that surveillance needed in the most private
spaces? Since the 1990s, the UK’s Home Office has spent 78 percent of its crime prevention
budget on CCTV installations, and schools have likewise invested significant resources in their own surveillance
equipment, the Big Brother Watch report said.
No significant research has been done into whether CCTV cameras actually lower
Big Brother Watch was able to locate a single study by the French Institut D’
Aménagement Et D’Urbanisme, which concluded that theft and burglary continued to increase after the 2007
installation of CCTV in the Île-de-France region. A marginal reduction in disorderly incidents in schools was also
‘Shocking’ highlights The Big Brother Watch report estimated that more than 100,000 cameras monitor
students and teachers across Britain, with 90 percent of the schools surveyed acknowledging the use of some form of
Responses from 2,107 secondary schools showed that they used 47,806 cameras in
total with more than half installed inside the schools. The Radclyffe School in Oldham surpassed all other schools
in the survey, with 20 cameras total in bathrooms and changing rooms.
Sharon Holder, the GMB’s national officer, told Newsvine that her trade union was
disgusted with the findings.
“Placing CCTV in school bathrooms poses a
worrying development in school policy and raises a number of questions,” she said. “How many parents have given
headteachers permission to film their child going to the toilet or having a shower? What happens to the film
afterwards? How much discussion has there been on governing bodies and to what extent have councils and councilors
had any input into these developments? What problems are the schools trying to solve?”
Alex welcomes "America's liberty belle" Dr. Katherine Albrecht to discuss the imminent threats to
our digital and personal privacy and ways to overcome warrantless government spying. Alex also covers other
major news items and takes your calls. http://www.katherinealbrecht.com/
Melissa welcomes Dr. Katherine Albrecht to discuss the imminent threats to our digital and
personal privacy and ways to overcome warrantless government spying. http://www.katherinealbrecht.com/
Mastering The Human
Who You Are – Collected information includes names, addresses, biometrics,
social media accounts .
What You Do – Travel history, communications, financial transactions and
movement of physical assets.
Who You Know – Relational information including family, friends, associates
Context – Contextual data such as demographics, politics, cultural norms
Acloser look at the
upcoming Jade Helm military exercise, specifically its “master the human domain” motto, reveals a larger agenda in
regards to domestic policy.
...“They’re building an infrastructure of tyranny,” stated Infowars David Knight.
“There’s a legal infrastructure with things like the NDAA, there’s a technical
infrastructure with things like the capability to do dragnet surveillance, and then of course there is going to be
a military and law enforcement infrastructure, and those are merging.”
Revelation 13:16 reads "And the second beast required all people small and great, rich and poor,
free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead,"
That quote leads us to the small hamlet of Geneva, Switzerland. Where the elite go about doing
Lucifer’s work. Geneva, Switzerland…Home of the European headquarters of the United Nations, and CERN. Geneva hosts
the highest number of international organizations in the world including the United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees (UNHCR), the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the World Health Organization
(WHO), the International Labour Organization (ILO), International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the International
Baccalaureate Organization (IBO) and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
Apart from the UN agencies, Geneva hosts many inter-governmental organizations, such as the World
Trade Organization (WTO), the World Economic Forum (WEF), the International Organization for Migration (IOM), and
the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).
"I freed a thousand slaves; I
could have freed a thousand more, if only they knew they were slaves."
Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who
are constantly and intelligently on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic
"A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time,
not on the spot, not here and now and in their calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other
worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the
encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it.”