welcome
|
||||
LIFE NEWS
The S.L.E.D. Test The SLED Test is a simple argument against abortion https://www.str.org/articles/the-s.l.e.d.-test Alan Shlemon Published Thu, 03/13/2014 - 07:00 The pro-life view is that the unborn are human beings just like you and me. That’s why it’s wrong to kill them. Although many abortion-choice advocates agree the unborn are human, they deny they are valuable human beings. They think this distinction justifies killing the unborn. Often they use personhood language to express this view. They say the unborn might be human, but it’s not a person. When confronted with this claim, ask a simple question: “What’s the difference between a human being and a human person?” They must answer this question. Why? They’ve just made the incredible claim that there are human beings that can be killed with impunity because they are not persons. What are their reasons for this view? What’s the difference between a born human and an unborn one that justifies killing the latter? Abortion-choice advocates typically cite one or more characteristics they believe make a human being a person. Each of these characteristics fall under one of four categories. You can remember these categories with the acronym SLED: Size, Level of development, Environment, and Degree of dependency. Although it’s true the unborn differs from a born human in these four ways, none of them is a relevant difference. None of them justifies killing the unborn. Consider how each category is irrelevant to human value.
Do you know how to defend your position on abortion? Do you get
uncomfortable when the topic comes up? Can you back up your views with logic and reason?
Size: The unborn is clearly smaller than a born human. It’s hard to reason how a difference in size, though, disqualifies someone from being a person. A four year-old is smaller than a fourteen year-old. Can we kill her because she’s not as big as a teenager? No, because a human being’s value is not based on their size. She’s still equally a person even though she differs in that characteristic. In the same way, the unborn is smaller than a four year-old. If we can’t kill the four-year old because she’s smaller, then we can’t kill the unborn because she’s smaller either.
Level of development: The unborn is also less developed than a born human being. How does this fact, though, disqualify the unborn from personhood? A four year-old girl can’t bear children because her reproductive system is less developed than a fourteen year-old girl. That doesn’t disqualify her from personhood. She is still as equally valuable as a child-bearing teen. The unborn is also less developed than the four year-old. Therefore, we can’t disqualify her from personhood for the same reason we can’t disqualify the four year-old. Both are merely less developed than older human beings.
Environment: The unborn is located in a different environment than a born human. How does your location, though, affect your value? Can changing your environment alter your status as a person? Where you are has no bearing on who you are. An astronaut who spacewalks in orbit is in a radically different environment than a person on the planet. No one could reasonably deny his personhood simply because he’s in a different location. Scuba divers who swim under water and spelunkers who crawl through caves are equally as valuable as humans who ride in hot-air balloons. If changing your environment can’t change your fundamental status, then being inside or outside a uterus can’t be relevant either. How could a 7-inch journey through the birth canal magically transform a value-less human into a valuable person? Nothing has changed except their location.
Degree of dependency: The unborn is dependent upon the mother’s body for nutrition and a proper environment. It’s hard to
see, though, how depending upon another person disqualifies you from being a person. Newborns and toddlers still
depend upon their parents to provide nutrition and a safe environment. Indeed, some third-world countries require
children to be breast fed because formula is not available. Can a mother kill her newborn son because he depends on
her body for nutrition? Or, imagine you alone witnessed a toddler fall into a swimming pool. Would you be justified
in declaring him not valuable simply because he depended on you for his survival? Of course not! Since the unborn
depends on his mother in the same way, it’s not reasonable to disqualify his value either. The SLED tactic exposes the argument for abortion for what it really is: unjust discrimination. Abortion-choice advocates deny that all human beings are valuable and deserve protection. Which ones don’t qualify? The ones that are too small, not developed enough, in the wrong location, and are too dependent on other people. In other words, the human beings that satisfy the SLED Test’s criteria are the ones that don’t make the cut. These four characteristics, though, are arbitrary and allow the strong to disqualify the weak, vulnerable, and defenseless. Sadly, history is crowded with similar examples. African Americans were victims of discrimination. They were a class of human beings that was disqualified from being valuable based on an arbitrary characteristic: their skin color. Jews were also were victims of discrimination. They were a class of human beings that was disqualified from being valuable based on an arbitrary characteristic: their ethnicity. Today, the unborn are victims of discrimination. They are a class of human beings that are disqualified from being valuable based on arbitrary characteristics: their size, level of development, environment, and degree of dependency. The pro-life position, on the other hand is an inclusive view. It says no human being – regardless of size, skin color, level of development, race, gender, or place of residence – should be excluded from the community of human persons. This view of humanity is inclusive and wide open to all, especially to those who are small, vulnerable, and defenseless.
Print a baby: Expectant parents see 3D models of their unborn children
Mothers-to-be can now print 3D models of their unborn children from ultrasound scans, thanks to the Embryo 3D service in the Russian city of Ufa. READ MORE: https://on.rt.com/90o8 LINKS : Abortion Genocide! , INFANTICIDE! ,Depopulation Agenda
Dead Fetus Cells in Pepsi and other Products
"Sadly, most Americans don’t even realize that large numbers of consumer products on our supermarket shelves contain ingredients which have been cultivated using aborted human fetal cell lines. This information is not hard to find. But people do not like to talk about it. There are price lists for human fetal tissue all over the Internet. You can find one example right here. So does it bother you that aborted babies are being chopped up and sold to researchers all over America? Or are you perfectly fine with it?"
Sickening: Major food corporations use tissue from aborted babies to manufacture flavor additives in processed foods LINK :
Dead Fetus Cells in Pepsi and other Products
Yes, they are selling baby parts. Published on Aug 8, 2015 Yes, they are selling baby parts. There are literally hours of unedited video of them haggling over specific pieces in Planned Parenthood offices across the country. But don't let the truth get in the way of a good old fashioned false debate... All Planned Parenthood undercover videos can be found on the official YouTube channel for The Center for Medical Progress here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... Here is the latest "Intact Fetuses 'Just a Matter of Line Items' for Planned Parenthood TX Mega-Center: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egGUE... LINK: Yes, they are selling baby parts
[PRO-LIFE PRO-CHOICE FLIP-FLOP] "Muh New York Values" (aka) "That's It Jake, I'm Unsubscribing!" Blackstone Intelligence Network
Published: Thursday, September 27, 2018
The Republican-controlled Congress is moving to enact a Defense appropriations bill that has morphed into a multi-agency "minibus" and continuing resolution that funds Planned Parenthood and research that uses fetal tissue taken from aborted babies. The version of the Labor-HHS-Education bill that was approved by the House Appropriations Committee on July 11—but never brought up for a vote on the House floor—defunded both Planned Parenthood and federal research that uses tissue taken from aborted babies. The version of the Labor-HHS-Education bill approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee on June 28 permitted funding of Planned Parenthood and research that uses tissue taken from aborted babies. By joining the Defense Department funding bill to the Senate Appropriations Committee’s version of the Labor-HHS-Education bill, the Republican leadership made it impossible for a senator to vote against funding Planned Parenthood and fetal tissue research without also voting against funding the Defense Department. Sen. Rand Paul (R.-Ky.) fought to get a vote on an amendment to the bill that would defund Planned Parenthood. Before the Republican leadership agreed to such a vote, Paul needed to go to the floor to speak out about what was happening. “My amendment would end the funding of Planned Parenthood,” Paul said. “Yet my amendment is now being blocked by Republicans.” “Many voters think Republicans actually care about the unborn,” said Paul. “Many voters think Republicans are really opposed to government-funded abortions. But the dirty little secret is that Republican leadership is blocking my amendment to defund Planned Parenthood.” “Big-spending Republicans fear that blocking funding for Planned Parenthood would derail their plans to greatly expand the welfare-warfare state,” he said. “So be it. The public has long known that the Democrats are the abortion party. Now the public will know that many Republicans just pay lip service to pro-life issues and are really more concerned with bloated government spending than with saving lives.” The seven senators who voted against the bill included six Republicans and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I.-Vt.). Sen. Mike Lee (R.-Utah), one of the six Republicans, delivered a floor speech explaining his opposition to this bill that funds Planned Parenthood and fetal-tissue research. “For the second straight year of unified Republican governance—unified pro-life governance—Congress’s annual spending bills will include no new reforms protecting unborn children or getting federal taxpayers out of the abortion business,” said Lee. “Under this bill,” said Lee, “neither the unborn nor taxpayers are any more protected from the abortion industry than they were under President Obama and a unified Democratic Congress.” Yesterday the House passed the bill, and for all of Donald Trump’s protestations over taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood and bloated government spending in general, Trump promised that he will sign this massive spending bill into law. How long will it take Christians and conservatives to wake up to the fact that the Republican Party in Washington, D.C., is nothing more than controlled opposition? The national GOP is as crooked as a dog’s hind leg. It has been selling itself as a “pro-life” party ever since the U.S. Supreme Court rendered its heinous Roe v Wade decision legalizing abortion-on-demand. But 45 years and 60 million aborted babies later, Roe is still the law of the land. Republicans are so pathetic that they can’t even defund the nation’s largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood, when they have total control over the entire federal government. And when Republicans say we must wait for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe (remember it was a Republican Supreme Court that passed Roe, and the Supreme Court has been dominated by Republican appointments ever since), they are spouting utter balderdash. Under Article. III. Section. 2. of the U.S. Constitution, a genuine pro-life Congress and White House could overturn Roe v Wade anytime it wanted to. The only reason the Republican Party hasn’t overturned Roe is because it hasn’t wanted to overturn Roe. And, incredibly, there are millions of Christians and conservatives who continue to believe that the GOP is pro-life. Is this stupidity, naïveté or what exactly? Furthermore, pro-life conservatives and Christians are beside themselves with glee over Trump’s appointment of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. They seem to be convinced that Kavanaugh is going to tip the scales on the High Court and finally overturn Roe v Wade. It is pure fantasy. In the first place, the idea that only the Supreme Court can overturn Roe only serves to reinforce the fallacious and unconstitutional doctrine of judicial supremacy. And, secondly, there is absolutely nothing in Kavanaugh’s record to suggest that he will vote to overturn Roe—all of the left-wing hysteria over the idea that he will notwithstanding. Kavanaugh believes that Roe is “settled law.” He believes that women and teenage girls “have a right to abortion.” Phillip Jauregui of the Judicial Action Group warned that Kavanaugh is not “constitutionally principled.” That’s an understatement. Not only is Kavanaugh neck-deep in his complicity to cover up the murder of Clinton Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, he has a judicial track record as being a loathsome toady for the Police State. Judge Andrew Napolitano is trying to warn conservatives that Kavanaugh is an “enemy of the Fourth Amendment.” Mises Institute reports (VIDEO): In a discussion on natural law, Napolitano noted that Judge Kavanaugh had established a record of supporting government surveillance on Americans, even when there was not probable cause to believe a crime was being committed. Kavanaugh's support for abuse of government power in this case, has been buttressed by the Patriot Act, one of the most anti-Fourth-Amendment pieces of legislation passed in recent decades. Napolitano goes on to outline the many ways the Patriot Act violates the natural rights behind the Fourth Amendment, concluding: "What young lawyer was the scrivener when they were putting together the Patriot Act?" It was, of course, Brett Kavanaugh. People who are putting their faith in Brett Kavanaugh to uphold the Natural rights of man codified in our Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights—including the right to life—are in for a rude awakening. Again, if Donald Trump and the Republicans in Congress truly wanted to overturn Roe v Wade and put a stop to legalized abortion-on-demand, they could have already done it. Do you really believe that a Republican President and Congress that haven’t been able to even defund Planned Parenthood for two years (make it six, if you include the years under Bush and Trump) are going to overturn Roe v Wade? You really aren’t that naïve, are you? Tell me again how a federal government under the control of the GOP is all that different from a federal government under the control of the Democrats. Both parties continue waging a perpetual never-ending war on innocent unborn babies and perpetual never-ending wars on innocent people abroad. Of course, the other war being waged by both Democrats and Republicans in Washington, D.C., (including Donald Trump) is the war on the Constitution. P.S. The other thing that both parties in Washington, D.C., have in common is their blind support for the Zionist State of Israel. And, in this regard, Donald Trump is the leader of the pack. Christian teaching in support of Zionist Israel is one of the greatest deceptions in Church history. No country is more rabidly pro-abortion than Israel. The State of Israel pays for a woman’s abortion up to the very moment of delivery—regardless of the reason. Zionists are among the most radical pro-abortion people in the world. In fact, many of the radical left-wing pro-abortion groups in the United States are comprised heavily of Zionists. Those who call themselves pro-life and pro-Israel at the same time are truly among the most deluded people on earth. I urge readers to get the 15-message series on the truth of Israel that I recently delivered. We have put all 15 messages into a 7-DVD set called The Israel Package. If purchased separately, these 15 messages would cost $95. But The Israel Package, including 7 DVDs containing all 15 messages, costs only $30. Basically, we are offering 15 messages for the price of 2. Plus, the DVDs come in a beautiful hard plastic case that will compliment any library or coffee table. And the price is affordable enough that sets can be purchased for friends and loved ones. As I said, this package includes 7 DVDs containing 15 messages, including: *“The Children Of Promise” *A Counterfeit Temple; A Counterfeit Israel *Christ’s Last Words To Israel *I Will Curse Them That Bless Thee And 11 more I am convinced that the Israel deception is to a great extent responsible for America’s rapid descent into the moral, cultural and political upheaval (including the abortion upheaval that has claimed the lives of over 60 million unborn babies) taking place in our country. The Israel deception has blinded the vast majority of evangelical pastors and churches and during the past 70 years has brought our country to the brink of ruination. I am further convinced that if our pastors and churches could be delivered from the Israel deception, it could bring a great national healing to our country. I urge readers to take advantage of this limited-time offer and order The Israel Package: 7 DVDs containing 15 messages on the truth about Israel for only $30. Order The Israel Package here:
© Chuck Baldwin
False Flags, Wars And Butchered Babies: A Neocon Paradise
“The Case For The Life Of The Unborn”
LibertyFellowshipMT | Jan 23, 2014 This Bible study was given by Pastor Chuck Baldwin on Wednesday, January 22, 2014 at Liberty Fellowship. To purchase a copy of this message or to support the fellowship please visit LibertyFellowshipMT.com
Forty-Seven Years Of An American
Holocaust
Published: Thursday, January 23, 2020 Yesterday, January 22, marked the forty-seventh anniversary of the Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton Supreme Court decisions legalizing abortion-on-demand. Forty-seven years! Since those dreadful decisions, over 60 million helpless innocent unborn babies have been mercilessly (but legally) slaughtered in the wombs of their mothers. Think about it: An American fifty years of age or younger has no conscious recollection of a country where abortion-on-demand was NOT legal. And the truth is, both major parties and the vast majority of America’s pastors and churches are equally culpable for this slaughter of innocents. The Republican Party touts itself as being "pro-life." The claim is so much hot air. The Supreme Court that voted to legalize abortion-on-demand in the Roe decision was dominated by Republican appointments by a margin of 6 - 3. And 5 of those Republican appointments (Harry Blackmun, Warren Burger, William Brennan, Potter Stewart and Lewis Powell Jr.) voted in favor of Roe, which means the votes of the Democrat-appointed justices were not even needed to pass Roe. For the record, two Democrats voted in support of Roe (William Douglas and Thurgood Marshall) and one Democrat voted against Roe (Byron White). And the only Republican to vote against Roe was William Rehnquist. Beyond that, the GOP controlled the entire federal government for 4.6 years of G.W. Bush's eight years in office—and they controlled the entire federal government for the first two years of Donald Trump’s presidency. They did nothing about Roe v Wade under Bush, and they have done nothing about Roe v Wade under Trump. While Ron Paul was a congressman, he would routinely introduce the "Sanctity of Life Act” in every congressional term; and the GOP leadership in Congress always let the bill collect dust in the document room and die. President Bush never once voiced his support for the bill. NOT ONCE. All three years of Trump’s presidency, Senator Rand Paul has introduced a bill that mirrors the “Sanctity of Life Act,” called the “Life at Conception Act.” And just as did Bush, Donald Trump has done NOTHING to promote the bill—and Republican leaders again made sure the bill went nowhere. Had Ron Paul's bill become law, it would have 1) defined life as beginning at conception, and 2) under Article. III. Section. 2. of the U.S. Constitution, completely removed abortion from the jurisdiction of the Court, thereby overturning Roe v Wade. All of this talk about nothing can be done about abortion-on-demand until some magical configuration of the Supreme Court decides to overturn it is just smoke and mirrors. Congress and the President could end abortion-on-demand anytime they wanted to. Plus, never forget that the Supreme Court has been dominated by Republican appointments ever since the Roe decision in 1973—and nothing has been done to overturn Roe. NOTHING! To add insult to injury, these national "pro-life" organizations such as the “National Right To Life Committee,” “Focus On The Family” and the “U.S. Conference Of Catholic Bishops”—and their affiliates at the State level—have consistently OPPOSED Dr. Paul’s “Sanctity of Life Act” and State personhood bills. Their reasoning goes something like this: “Since it was a Supreme Court ruling that instituted abortion-on-demand, we must wait for the U.S. Supreme Court to issue a ruling reversing the decision.” Such reasoning is pure poppycock! Montana Pro-Life Coalition President Dr. Ann Bukacek delivered an excellent presentation on how the big “pro-life” organizations such as those listed above are nothing more than controlled opposition and are as much to blame for keeping the Roe decision intact as anything else. Her presentation is entitled Pro-Life Legislation: Fake And Genuine. I urge readers to watch it. In 1857, the Supreme Court issued its dreadful Dred Scott decision, saying that African slaves were “so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the Negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic whenever a profit could be made by it.” Now please tell me, when was the Dred Scott decision ever reversed by the Supreme Court? It wasn’t. The Supreme Court never reversed the Dred Scott decision. It was reversed by the passage of the 14th Amendment in 1868. And as you know, a constitutional amendment is an act of the U.S. Congress proposing—and the individual states approving—an amendment. In other words, the Supreme Court wasn’t involved in the remedy AT ALL. It is the responsibility of each branch of Congress to serve as a check and balance to the other two branches. In other words, when the Supreme Court issues an unconstitutional ruling (which the Roe and Doe decisions certainly were), it is the duty of the other two branches, especially Congress, to correct the abridgments of the judicial branch. Why else would Article. III. Section. 2. (along with other provisions) even be in the U.S. Constitution? To suggest that the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of the Constitution is antithetical to the principle of federalism upon which America was founded. I submit that if the Supreme Court is the lone arbiter of the Constitution, the oaths that a President and members of Congress take to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” are absolutely moot and meaningless. Why take an oath to something to which you have no obligation? If the Supreme Court alone is the arbiter of the Constitution, the other two branches of government are not even necessary. Here is what Thomas Jefferson wrote regarding this fallacious doctrine of judicial supremacy: "The question whether the judges are invested with exclusive authority to decide on the constitutionality of a law has been heretofore a subject of consideration with me in the exercise of official duties. Certainly there is not a word in the Constitution which has given that power to them more than to the Executive or Legislative branches." (Thomas Jefferson to W. H. Torrance, 1815) "[The Constitution] meant that its coordinate branches should be checks on each other. But the opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch." (Thomas Jefferson to Abigail Adams, 1804) "To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps. . . . And their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective controul. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal knowing that, to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time & party its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves." (Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820) "In denying the right [the Supreme Court] usurps of exclusively explaining the Constitution . . . then indeed is our Constitution a complete [act of suicide]. For intending to establish three departments, coordinate and independant, that they might check and balance one another, it has given according to this opinion, to one of them alone the right to prescribe rules for the government of the others; and to that one too which is unelected by, and independent of, the nation. The Constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary which they may twist and shape in to any form they please." (Thomas Jefferson to Spencer Roane, 1819) These so-called pro-life organizations have been waiting around for forty-seven years for the magical configuration of the Supreme Court to reverse Roe. And in the meantime, over 60 million unborn babies have died. And again I remind you that the Republican Party has dominated the appointments to the Supreme Court during the years following the Roe and Doe decisions in 1973—and continues to dominate the makeup of the Court today. Donald Trump keeps bragging that he is the most pro-life president America has ever had. Please tell that to the 3.2 million babies who have been murdered in their mothers’ wombs since Trump became president. Tell the 3,000 babies who are aborted EVERY DAY since Trump became president how “pro-life” he is. Not only have Donald Trump and his fellow Republicans in Washington, D.C., done nothing to overturn Roe, they continue to provide taxpayer funding for abortion providers to the tune of over $500 million annually. That’s right. Donald Trump has given Planned Parenthood over $1.7 billion since he became president. Tell me again how “pro-life” Donald Trump is. Also digest this: These national “pro-life” organizations commonly have retirement benefits built into the contracts of their staff. What does that tell you? It tells me that these organizations have no intention or expectation of Roe v Wade being reversed. I personally believe the major "pro-life" groups mentioned above care NOTHING about ending abortion, because if that actually happened, they wouldn't be able to continue to suck millions of dollars annually from pro-life Christians and conservatives and, thus, keep their plush jobs intact. At the national and State levels, the so-called pro-life organizations mentioned above lobby AGAINST personhood bills and true pro-life bills such as Ron Paul’s “Sanctity of Life Act.” They—as much as liberal Democrats—are responsible for Roe v Wade’s longevity. “Conservative” legislators like it, because it allows them to tout themselves as being “pro-life” to their constituents without actually doing anything about it, and “pro-life” organizations like it because it allows them to keep up their fundraising efforts—which allows them to stay employed in cushy lobbying jobs—without having to produce anything. Let me ask you: How many pastors across the country will even bother to raise the moral and scriptural conscience of their congregations to the evils of abortion? How many bother to bring a detailed exegesis on what the Bible teaches regarding the right to life, when life begins and God’s laws and principles regarding the killing of unborn children? Come on, be honest. How many of you who attend church each Sunday hear more than a two-minute sound bite once a year about abortion—if even a mention at all? This helps explain why, according to recent surveys of the women obtaining abortions in America, 70% claim to be Christians, and 40% claim to be regular church attenders. Think of the millions of babies that are being murdered in the womb because America’s pastors don’t have the courage or moral integrity to teach their congregations the truth about abortion. Not long ago, I brought a message entitled The Case For The Life Of The Unborn. This message is a thorough examination of both scriptural and scientific evidence that proves life begins at conception and that the constitutional and Natural Law duty of our republic is to protect innocent life. It seems almost certain that the vast majority of Christians in our country have never once heard an in-depth Biblical exegesis—with supporting medical evidence—about the Natural Law principles of the right to life of the unborn child. I urge you to order as many of these message DVDs as you can, and give them to as many people as you can—including to your State senators and representatives. Most of the people you give them to will have never heard anything like it before. Who knows? Giving this DVD to someone might even save the life of an unborn child. Order my message DVD The Case For The Life Of The Unborn here. You and I both know that the only reason the slaughter of innocents has gone on this long in our country is because the vast majority of pastors and churches are completely silent and apathetic on the subject. Pastors and churches are the nation’s moral compass and conscience, and when they are indifferent to a national moral crisis, such as legalized abortion-on-demand, the nation itself remains indifferent. Culpability for the slaughter of millions of unborn babies lies on the doorstep of a cowardly American church and clergy, on the doorstep of the so-called pro-life organizations mentioned above (which are nothing more than controlled opposition) and on the doorstep of the duplicitous Republican Party as much as on the doorstep of liberal Democrats. It also lies on the doorstep of those Christians who support the State of Israel. Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott recently received the “Friends of Zion Award” in Jerusalem. In receiving the award, Abbott told his Zionist benefactors, “Anybody who is an enemy of Israel is an enemy of Texas.” I would counter Abbott by saying: Anybody who is a friend of Israel is an enemy of unborn babies. The State of Israel is one of the world’s foremost proponents of abortion-on-demand. Israel actually pays for a woman’s abortion up to and including full-term abortions. That means the government of Israel will pay to kill an unborn baby up to the point of the baby’s birth. In fact, Israel’s abortion laws are far more liberal than the abortion laws of its Muslim neighbors. And here in America, Jews are among the most outspoken zealots advocating for legalized abortion, arguing that under the teaching of the Talmud, to prohibit abortion is to violate the religious rights of Jewish women to kill their unborn children. (Shhh. Don’t let your evangelical Christian Zionist friends know about these things; they might pop a gourd.) Until genuine pro-life Americans start to figure all of this out, the killing of unborn babies will go on and on. P.S. Again, order my message DVD The Case For The Life Of The Unborn here. And to learn more about Judaism’s promotion of abortion, read Michael Hoffman’s excellent book, Judaism’s Strange Gods. © Chuck Baldwin *If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link: Chuck Baldwin Live Donate Form I also have many books and DVDs available for purchase online. Go here: To subscribe to my weekly columns, click here:
"We have arrived at a period in American and world history when being awake is of utmost importance. Being in a position of leadership and yet asleep to critical issues at such a time will certainly lead to the ‘disastrous results..." -- An excerpt from, Asleep At The Switch: An Open Letter to America's Pastors LINK: Asleep at the switch: An Open Letter to America's Pastors
REACH OUT TO OTHERS [Help Educate Family And Friends With This Page And The Links Below] Do you know how to defend your position on abortion? Do you get uncomfortable when the topic comes up? Can you back up your views with logic and reason?
MORE:Depopulation Agenda | Overpopulation MythINFANTICIDE! | Depopulating The Third World! | AGENDA 21 Genocide by The House of Windsor | Radiation In Drinking Water | Soft Kill Depopulation Prgm. | Chem Trails | Chem Trails Exposed | Contrails vs Chemtrails | Vaccines Expose | Vaccines Analyzed | Vaccines Killing Soldiers | GMO Genetic Armageddon! | GMOs = DEATH! | GMO Analyzed | GMO Cloning Program | GMO at WHOLE FOODS | Bisphenol A (BPA) Death by Plastic | Fluoride | Fluoride2 Fluoride3 | Electromagnetic Pollution | Overpopulation Myth
| ||||
