This top secret think tank has been
pulling the strings of American government for at least 60 years
Born in the wake of World War II as a factory of ideas designed to advise the Air Force
on how to wage and win wars, RAND quickly grew into a magnet for the best and brightest, and became the creator of
America’s nuclear strategy in the struggle against the Soviets. From its ranks arose Cold War luminaries Albert
Wohlstetter, Bernard Brodie, and Herman Kahn, who arguably saved us from nuclear annihilation with their doctrines
of fail-safe and second strike, and unquestionably created what Eisenhower first termed the military-industrial complex.
The Kennedy era brought RAND directly into the corridors of power, where its analysts
became McNamara’s Whiz Kids and its theories of rational warfare steered our conduct in the Vietnam War. Those same
theories would drive our invasion of Iraq forty-five years later, championed by RAND-affiliated actors such as Paul
Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Zalmay Khalilzad, and Donald Rumsfeld. But RAND’s greatest contribution might be its
least known: rational choice theory, a model explaining all human behavior through self-interest. With that theory
RAND sparked the Reagan-led transformation of our social and economic system and also unleashed a resurgence of
precisely the forces whose existence it denied—religion, patriotism, tribalism.
...RAND's ultimate goal was to have technocrats running
every aspect of society in pursuit of aone world
governmentthat would be administered under "the rule of reason," a ruthless world where
efficiency was king and men were little more than machines, which is why RAND studied the social sciences because
they were at a loss to work out how to deal with people and how human beings did not always act in their own
predictable self-interests. There is no place for love, empathy or selflessness inthe new world orderthat RAND and the Ford Foundation are working to
create, and patriotism and altruism are adversarial to their aims.
journalist and author Alex Abella was allowed exclusive access inside the RAND Corporation to view their archives.
What he discovered was a plot driven by mad scientists, behaviorists, and generals who were intent on starting
world war three and fleecing the American people in the process. Once he was a skeptic on the subject of
conspiracy theories and the new world order, but after his work with the RAND Corporation
he is now convinced that this top secret think tank has been pulling the strings of American government for at
least 60 years.
Rand Corp. Exposed, Corbett Report
Description: What is a think tank and how can a mere research institution actually shape the
society it claims to be studying? Join us this week on The Corbett Report as we head down into the nuclear bunker
with the boys from RAND to unearth the secrets of the research institution that has molded our world for the past
"We're all the bastard children of RAND and we don't even know it," remarks
Abella, as he charts how RAND started off as an organization centered around building new weapons for the military
but ultimately expanded into politics, science, history and economics and was closely allied with the Ford,
Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations. RAND's decision in the 50's to re-model the globe towards a new world order
changed everything, with the development of "rational choice theory," which turned people from being citizens into
consumers, as rights and responsibilities were replaced with choices and people's lives slowly came to be dominated
not by integrity or what they stood for, but by what they spent their money on.
RAND's ultimate goal was to have technocrats running every aspect of society in
pursuit of a one world government that would be administered under "the
rule of reason," a ruthless world where efficiency was king and men were little more than machines, which is why
RAND studied the social sciences because they were at a loss to work out how to deal with people and how human
beings did not always act in their own predictable self-interests. There is no place for love, empathy or
selflessness in the new world order that RAND and the Ford Foundation are working to
create, and patriotism and altruism are adversarial to their aims.
how RAND was instrumental in developing the strategy behind the use of nuclear weapons, and how they actively
promoting nuking the entirety of Eastern Europe as well as China in case of problems in Western Europe, a policy
that could easily have sparked off a catastrophic nuclear holocaust. RAND researchers believed that as long as 10
million Americans survived a nuclear war, the war was won.
Abella notes how RAND saw the United Nations as a template for one world
government but that a new organization controlled by the U.S. would eventually supersede the UN and become the de
facto world government, which is why RAND researchers such as John Williams advocated pre-emptive nuclear strikes
on the Soviet Union, to make sure the United States would be the only country with the supreme power to impose its
will on the rest of the world.
Speaking on the topic of false
flag attacks, Abella notes that the staged Gulf of Tonkin attack and the planned Operation Northwoods false flag
were both initially proposed in RAND documents, highlighting the total immorality with which RAND war games its
scenarios, many of which are ethically repugnant in that they nonchalantly promote the genocide of entire
populations with little regard for the consequences. Abella explains how RAND truly is a shadow government because
it serves as a revolving door between the two, and how RAND is the cradle of the military-industrial complex and
the birthplace of the technocratic elite that we are now fighting against.
We encourage all our subscribers to watch this video now at Prison
Planet.tv by visiting the "video reports" section. Not a member? Pleaseclick here to
subscribe and get instant access to this interview, along with
thousands of hours of material, including daily access to the live video stream and video archives of The Alex
Description: What is a think tank and how can a mere research
institution actually shape the society it claims to be studying? Join us this week on The Corbett
Report as we head down into the nuclear bunker with the boys from RAND to unearth the secrets of the
research institution that has molded our world for the past 60 years.
Documentation – ParadigmShift.tv
The home page of Paradigm Shift TV, which now broadcasts Corbett Report
videos on Sky Channel 201 Friday nights at 7:00 PM UK time.
Beyond the agricultural and industrial revolutions of the past, a
global technology revolution is currently changing the world. This book discusses the
broad, multidisciplinary, and synergistic trends in this revolution, including
genomics, cloning, biomedical engineering, smart materials, agile manufacturing,
nanofabricated computation devices, and integrated microsystems.
The Rand Corporation and the American Empire, a study of
the world's most influential think tank
FLASHBACK TO SEPT 28, 2010-Father of State Sponsored Terrorism (Full Interview)
Alex talks with Emmy-nominated TV reporter and screenwriter Alex Abella, author of Soldiers of Reason: The Rand
Corporation and the American Empire, a study of the world's most influential think tank. Abella was the first
journalist to have full access to RAND's files in Santa Monica, California. Abella, who migrated with his family to
the United States at age 10 from Cuba, is also the author Shadow Enemies, a non-fiction account of a plot by Adolf
Hitler to start a wave of terror and destruction in the United States. He is also the author of several novels,
including The Killing of the Saints and The Great American. http://www.abellaweb.com/index.html http://www.infowars.com/ http://www.planetinfowars.com/
Born in the wake of World War II, RAND
quickly became the creator of America’s anti-Soviet nuclear strategy. A magnet for the best and the brightest, its
ranks included Cold War luminaries such as Albert Wohlstetter, Bernard Brodie, and Herman Kahn, who arguably saved
us from nuclear annihilation and unquestionably created Eisenhower’s "military-industrial complex." In the Kennedy
era, RAND analysts and their theories of rational warfare steered our conduct in Vietnam. Those same theories drove
our invasion of Iraq forty-five years later, championed by RAND affiliated actors such as Paul Wolfowitz, Donald
Rumsfeld, and Zalmay Khalilzad. But RAND’s greatest contribution might be its least known: rational choice theory,
a model explaining all human behavior through self-interest. Through it RAND sparked the Reagan-led transformation
of our social and economic system but also unleashed a resurgence of precisely the forces whose existence it denied
-- religion, patriotism, tribalism.
With Soldiers of Reason, Alex Abella has rewritten the history of America’s last half century and cast a new light
on our problematic present.
Read an Excerpt from Soldiers of Reason by Alex Abella
The RAND Corporation’s the boon of the world
They think all day long for a fee
They sit and play games about going up in flames
For Counters they use you and me.
—"The RAND Hymn," by MALVINA REYNOLDS
ON OCTOBER 1, 1945, less than two months after the dropping of two nuclear bombs on Japan, the
commanding general of the U.S. Army Air Forces boarded a flight from Washington, D.C., to San Francisco on a trip
he was certain would be as momentous as the Manhattan Project.
A man of medium stature, with pudgy features, clear eyes, and a constant smile, General Henry
Harley "Hap" Arnold was a true believer in the power of the Air Force. He was one of only nine people ever to earn
the rank of five-star general and the only one with that rank in the Air Force. He had received his military pilot
license in 1912, and since then had pushed for an Air Force independent of the Army; he never wavered in his
conviction of the usefulness of maximum destructive power in combat. On hearing doubts on the legitimacy of the
Allied fire bombing in Dresden, Germany, Arnold wrote, "We must not get soft. War must be destructive and to a
certain extent inhuman and ruthless."
General Arnold had welcomed the development and deployment of nuclear bombs—especially since it had
fallen to the Army Air Force to deliver, and thus control, that mightiest of weapons. (By 1947 President Truman
would cleave the Air Force from its Army concatenation, setting up both services as rivals for the Pentagon’s
largesse.) But Arnold was concerned that the amazing concentration of scientific minds that had made possible the
Manhattan Project would prove hard to duplicate under peacetime conditions.
Washington had recruited talent from far and wide for its crusade against the Axis. The production
capabilities and sheer output of the country’s industries (General Motors, Ford, U.S. Steel, General Electric) had
been harnessed by the best and the brightest minds from the country’s top scientific research centers (MIT,
Princeton, Columbia), giving the world radar, jet fighters, the atom bomb. In the span of four years, the country
had grown from a second-rate power to the greatest military behemoth in history. It was the dawn of the American
New Order. Like ancient Athens and her league, it would be an empire of the willing—America’s allies willed her to
rule the world and rule the world she would.
Yet now that the battle was won, the unlikely alliance that had guided the United States to victory
was splitting apart. Businesses wanted to make money and scientists wanted to do research. Few wanted to put up
with the military’s restrictions and low pay. General Arnold feared that if everybody went back to industry or
academia, America’s enemies could one day hold sway. The likeliest adversary: our erstwhile wartime ally, the
Already in March 1946, former British prime minister Winston Churchill had warned about an Iron
Curtain descending on Europe. Soviet leader Joseph Stalin had shattered his wartime alliance with the United
States, and his troops, firmly in control of Central and Eastern Europe, were pressuring Italy and France. Soviet
boots seemed ready to crush all political opposition; it was only a matter of time before a major American-Soviet
conflict developed. That was why Arnold was flying to California, to find a way to hire the best brains in the
country, put them together in a space they could call their own, and have them come up with weapons nobody had ever
Even in the midst of the war, a year earlier, Arnold had requested his chief scientific adviser, a
colorful Hungarian named Theodore von Kármán (who was also director of the Guggenheim Laboratories), to devise a
plan to entice scientists to continue working for the Air Force during peacetime. Kármán had come up with a report
called "Toward New Horizons," which called for the establishment of a new kind of scientific community, "a nucleus
for scientific groups such as those which successfully assisted in the command and staff work in the field during
the war," a university without students and with the Air Force as its only client. In other words, a prototype for
the organization that would become RAND. Arnold had been delighted with the plan, but the exigencies of the war had
made him put it aside until the right moment. That moment came when lean, steely-jawed, blue-eyed former test pilot
Franklin R. Collbohm, visiting from California, came into Arnold’s office one day in September of 1945.
A fanatically fit former marine, Collbohm swam in his pool every morning, rain or shine, before
going to work. He had fled his childhood environs in upstate New York for the wide skies and opportunities of the
West as soon as he could, eventually becoming the right-hand man of Donald Douglas, head of Douglas Aircraft,
America’s largest airplane manufacturer, and the special assistant to Arthur E. Raymond, the company’s vice
president and head of engineering.
Arnold and Collbohm had met in 1942, when Collbohm procured nascent radar technology being
developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for the Army Air Force. Both men shared a passion for
aircraft and a deep love for the armed forces, to the point that they might have been inverse images of each
other—Arnold advocating for scientists among the military and Collbohm standing up for the Air Force among the
Like Arnold, Collbohm was concerned with the imminent dispersal of the best brains the United
States could hire, and had approached a number of officials in Washington, D.C., about finding a way to retain top
scientists after the war, with little success. When he finally came to Arnold’s office, though, Collbohm did not
even have to finish describing his idea for setting up an advisory group of independent scientists consulting for
the military before the general slapped his desk and exclaimed, "I know just what you’re going to tell me. It’s the
most important thing we can do." He told Collbohm to call Douglas right away to enlist his cooperation; they were
to meet at California’s Hamilton Air Force Base in two days. Collbohm was to have a list of all the things required
to make the project come to fruition—the men, the machines, the money.
Collbohm grabbed the first plane he could out of Washington, a B-25 bomber, and landed at Douglas’s
Santa Monica plant. He gathered all the Douglas officials he needed for the meeting and then looked for a plane to
get them to the San Francisco Bay Area. The only aircraft available was President Roosevelt’s private plane, a
Douglas C-54 dubbed "The Sacred Cow," so Collbohm and his people grabbed that and flew to Hamilton in it, arriving
at the base just an hour ahead of Arnold, with barely enough time to round up a luncheon for the meeting.
When the general’s B-21 rumbled into Hamilton Air Force Base, waiting for him were Collbohm,
Raymond, and Douglas, whose daughter had married Arnold’s son. Arnold had brought with him Edward Bowles, a
consultant from MIT who had collaborated with Collbohm in setting up the first instance of coordinated civilian and
military efforts in wartime planning, the B-29 Special Bombardment Project in 1944.
Lunch was served and the men got to work. One of the chief concerns of the meeting was how the new
organization would help develop the technology of long-distance missiles, which Arnold was convinced was the wave
of the future. Arnold and his group were adamant that only the Air Force and no other branch of the armed forces
should control the new weapon. By the time he finished his coffee, Arnold had pledged $10 million from unspent
wartime research money to set up the research group and keep it running independently for a few years. Arthur
Raymond suggested the name Project RAND, for research and development. Collbohm nominated himself to head the group
while he looked for a permanent director. (His temporary stay would eventually stretch to more than twenty years.)
And so was RAND conceived.
At first, Project RAND had no specific definition of purpose other than the very general outline
hashed out in Hamilton Field—a civilian outfit to come up with new weapons. But how? Besides long-range missiles,
what other kind of weapons? How many? Arnold, Collbohm, Bowles, and Douglas exchanged memos, letters, and
suggestions on the future of the organization for months, but final details were not worked out until General
Curtis LeMay came into the picture in late December.
Gruff, aggressive, demanding, and some would say demented, LeMay was the coldest of the cold
warriors. With his bulldog swagger and "never surrender" attitude, he served as a prototype for several generals in
the movie Doctor Strangelove, advocating massive attacks on the enemy—whichever enemy America happened to be facing
at the time, although usually the Soviet Union—while chomping on a stogie.
Named Air Force Deputy Chief of Air Staff for Research and Development, LeMay included among his
responsibilities the supervision of the new research group. Whether purposely or by the sheer serendipity that can
accompany government work, LeMay turned out to be the ideal candidate to shepherd the fledgling organization. With
typical impatience, he tore through the red tape hindering the birth of RAND—at one point gathering all the Air
Force bureaucrats needed for budget approval in one room and refusing to let them leave until they signed off on
Project RAND’s exact mission. Finally, on March 1, 1946, RAND officially was delivered. Its charter was clear:
"Project RAND is a continuing program of scientific study and research on the broad subject of air warfare with the
object of recommending to the Air Force preferred methods, techniques and instrumentalities for this purpose."
Unlike other government contractors, RAND would be exempt from reporting to a contracting command.
Instead, the unfiltered results would be delivered straight to LeMay. LeMay made sure that Project RAND could
accept or reject Air Force suggestions for research and that RAND alone would determine the overall balance of its
research. In exchange, the Air Force would receive information on intelligence, plans, and programs to optimize the
value of its research; nevertheless, the project in no way was meant to exempt the Air Force from its own
decision-making responsibilities. In other words, RAND would always be subservient to the Air Force when it came to
deciding what would get made and how.
Arnold, Collbohm, and LeMay proved prescient on the government’s need for continued assistance from
independent civilian scientists in peacetime. Within a few years, a new mind-set would take hold in government:
science, rather than diplomacy, could provide the answers needed to cope with threats to national
security—especially vis-à-vis the growing Soviet military menace.
The United States had demobilized its armed forces after World War II; new weapons, such as the
atomic bomb, were seen as cheaper and more efficient than keeping large numbers of soldiers stationed abroad.
Rather than nationalize key military industries, as Great Britain and France had done, the U.S. government opted to
contract out its scientific research development to private concerns. The private sector, not bound by the
procurement and personnel requirements of the Pentagon, could create new weapons faster and cheaper. RAND would be
a bridge between the two worlds of military planning and civilian development.
Secrets of the RAND CORP Exposed!
Alex and crew visit the RAND Corp and cover the mushroom cloud and more
Trinity and Beyond Trailer
Declassified footage about the development of the nuclear weapon
of atomic bomb tests in Nevada
- Soldiers being exposed to high levels of radiation
Yes, this idiocy continues today: treating unsuspecting men as guinea pigs!
Alex Jones, founder of alternative news networks Infowars and Prison Planet, presents a
full-length documentary/presentation with Joel Skousen, author of Strategic Relocation, North American Guide to
Safe Places and The Secure Home, to discuss the long-term threats facing Americans and how to relocate for safety
and security. Joel and Alex examine the information within Strategic Relocation including the effects of natural
disasters, nuclear war, long-term power failures, large-scale social unrest and police state tyranny. They consider
the pros and cons of countries around the world but give particular emphasis to the state and provinces in the US
and Canada. Joel also describes cost-effective ways of securing a residence to protect yourself and your
preparations. Whether you are looking to expatriate off-shore or build a dream house away from the serious threats
facing us, you'll find answers in this fact-filled interview and companion to the wide-selling book, Strategic
Skousen: Why North Korea is The Trigger
This is Part 2 of the Skousen World Update. The third and final excerpt from today's interview
with Author and Preparedness Expert Joel Skousen, Joel breaks down why Iran is being allowed to continue on its
nuclear quest. Why North Korea is being allowed to maintain its present totalitarian regime and what will happen
when all of these triggers start to be activated. Skousen predicts an all out thermal nuclear war and the human
remnant which will rebuild thereafter. He even discusses Safer Places from his book. Another great interview with
Elitist Vampires Pick The Ukranian Bones
During the top of hour three Alex is joined via Skype by world renowned relocation
consultant, publisher of World Affairs Brief and author of Strategic Relocation: North American Guide to Safe
Places, Joel Skousen about the developments in Crimea and Ukraine and how the global elite plan to pilfer the
Alex is joined via Skype by world renowned relocation consultant, publisher of World
Affairs Brief and author of Strategic Relocation: North American Guide to Safe Places, Joel Skousen about the
developments in Crimea and Ukraine and how the global elite plan to pilfer the country dry in the conclusion to
this incredibly informative interview.
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great
publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost
forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to
the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to
march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is
surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." David Rockefeller [June,
An independent agency of the United States government responsible for
collecting and coordinating intelligence and counterintelligence activities abroad in the national
interest; headed by the Director of Central Intelligence under the supervision of the President and
National Security Council...There has been considerable criticism of the CIA relating to security
and counterintelligence failures, failures in intelligence analysis, human rights concerns,
external investigations and document releases, influencing public opinion and law enforcement, drug
trafficking, and lying to Congress. In 1987, the former CIA Station Chief in Angola in 1976, John
Stockwell, said the CIA is responsible for tens of thousands of covert actions and destablization
programs since it was created by Congress with the passage of the National Security Act of
1947.At the time, Stockwell estimated that over 6
million people had died in CIA covert actions.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is a governmental agency
belonging to the United StatesDepartment of Justice that serves as both a federal criminal
investigative body and an internal intelligence agency (counterintelligence). Also, it is the
government agency responsible for investigating crimes on Indian reservations in the United States
under the Major Crimes Act. The branch has investigative jurisdiction over violations of more than
200 categories of federal crime. The agency was established in 1908 as the Bureau of Investigation
(BOI). Its name was changed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 1935. The agency
headquarters is the J. Edgar Hoover Building, located in Washington, D.C. The agency has fifty-six
field offices located in major cities throughout the United States, and more than 400 resident
agencies in lesser cities and areas across the nation. More than 50 international offices called
"legal attachés" exist in U.S. embassies and consulates general worldwide.
'Federal Bureau of Investigation organizes almost
all terror plots in the US' ...The report reveals that the FBI regularly infiltrates communities
where they suspect terrorist-minded individuals to be engaging with others. Regardless of their
intentions, agents are sent in to converse within the community, find suspects that could
potentially carry out “lone wolf” attacks and then, more or less, encourage them to do so. By
providing weaponry, funds and a plan, FBI-directed agents will encourage otherwise-unwilling
participants to plot out terrorist attacks, only to bust them before any events fully
Ever since its inception there have been those who have
warned that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, far from offering a simple "collective security" pact to ensure
the integrity of its member nations' borders, would in fact be used as an offensive tool of imperial adventurism
and conquest. Since the NATO-led Kosovo bombing campaign of 1999 at the very least, those fears have appeared more
and more justified.
Since that time, NATO has continued to take a lead role in more and more overtly
offensive campaigns of aggression in theatre after theatre. By now it is commonly understood to be an extension of
the Pentagon itself, a convenient international military instrument for Washington to wield whenever the pretense
of an international consensus cannot be achieved at the UN Security Council.
-- James Corbett
NATO is the first attempt in history to establish an aggressive
global military formation, one which currently includes a third of the nations of the world either as members or
partners, has members and partners on five continents and has conducted active operations on four, with the
potential to expand its reach into the remaining two where it has not yet officially intruded
itself...As NATO continues to expand across the globe
through a series of partnerships, initiatives and dialogues, what was once a collective security agreement is
increasingly becoming a global military strike force capable of bombarding, invading and occupying countries
anywhere in the world.
The SPFOR (to use the inevitable acronym) would be a “hybrid” military/law
enforcement unit created within the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) for use “in a range of tasks such as crowd and
riot control, special weapons and tactics (SWAT), and investigations of organized criminal groups” — both abroad,
in UN-directed multilateral military operations, and at home, as dictated by the needs of the Regime.
Initially as small as 2–6,000 personnel, the SPFOR’s size “could be increased by
augmenting it with additional federal, state, or local police from the United States” as necessary.
The RAND study, which was conducted for the U.S. Army’s Peacekeeping and Stability
Operations Institute, recommended using the Marshals Service rather than the US Army’s Military Police as
host for the SPFOR in order to avoid conflicts with the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids (albeit in
practice) the domestic use of the military as a law enforcement
“The USMS hybrid option … provides an important nondeployed mission for the force:
augmenting state and local agencies, many of which currently suffer from severe personnel shortages,” states the
report without explaining how the SPFOR could at once “augment” those under-manned agencies while at the same
by them if necessary.
That little lapse in logic is one of several indications that the report’s authors weren’t so much addressing a
“problem” as making a case for a preordained “solution” — in this case, creating the vanguard of a militarized
internal security force.
Building the SPFOR within the Marshals Service “would place it where its members can develop the needed skills
under the hybrid staffing option,” summarizes the document. “Furthermore, the USMS has the broadest law enforcement
mandate of any U.S. law enforcement agency…. [This model] provides significant domestic policing and homeland
security benefits by providing thousands of additional police officers across the United States.” (Emphasis
Back in 1961, the U.S. Government produced a document entitled “Freedom From
War” that envisioned the creation of a globe-spanning United Nations “Peace Force” that
would work in collaboration with a militarized “internal security” force in each country. Since that time, critics
of the UN have anticipated the day when foreign “peacekeepers” would be assigned to police American streets and, if
necessary, confiscate privately owned firearms.
While the monstrosity headquartered on the East River is a proper target of our scorn and hostility, the new
RAND study underscores the fact that if
“peacekeepers” end up patrolling American streets, they probably won’t be foreigners in blue berets, but homegrown
jackboots commanded by Washington.
(My thanks to Jack Slater for tipping me about the RAND report.)
In the video below, Alex Jones highlights how the
Guardian Centers video is yet another startling indication that authorities in the United States are preparing for
civil unrest as America increasingly begins to resemble a militarized police state.
in Eclipse" is a 320-page expose and indictment of our nation's descent into the early stages of police state
tyranny. Topics discussed include the militarization and federalization of law enforcement; the establishment of a
quasi-dictatorial "war presidency"; the evisceration of the Bill of Rights, and due process guarantees going back
to the Magna Carta; the increasingly commonplace surveillance of Americans; the institutionalization of torture;and
the likely restoration of conscription, including a military draft.
Sen Lindsey Graham has warned of a nuclear strike in S Carolina following the report by Alex
Jones and Anthony Gucciardi about low key nuke transfer from Texas to South Carolina. http://www.infowars.com/exclusive-hig...
Exclusive: High Level Source Confirms Secret US Nuclear Warhead Transfer
Radio host Michael Savage joins in calling for answers over
secret nuke transfer
October 13, 2013
Top radio host Michael Savage has joined in calling for
answers regarding the leaked
secret transfer of nuclear weapons to South Carolina that was followed by both warnings of a nuclear
strike by South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham and the termination of the top two US nuke commanders.
Originally reported by myself and Alex Jones back on September 3rd, a number of disturbing red flags have
continued to give further evidence to the high level military intelligence source that initially exposed the
transfer of the off-the-record nuclear warheads from Dyess Air Force base to South Carolina — and still, the
irrelevant mega media has ultimately failed to even investigate. Once again, the real media continues to dominate
along with investigative radio personalities in reporting on the news that matters.
As Savage points out, specifically speaking on my report last
Friday concerning how the termination of a high level nuke commander coincided
with the exact September 3rd date of the secret transfer, what we truly need is answers. And while we are
already talking about an issue that is deeply concerning at a base level, what really give the secret transfer a
disturbing amount of depth are the events that followed the leaked intel.
It was Senator Lindsey Graham who came out later on
the same day in warning against a ‘nuclear attack’ in South Carolina if we did not take military action in Syria.
Then we also consider the fact that two of the top nuke commanders in the United States were terminated for
laughable reasons, and it becomes an even larger red flag scenario. What is most amazing to me, however, is the
fact that the termination of the commanders was actually leaked to
the Associated Press and others.
What this means is that United States government did not want us to know that the commanders were terminated —
specifically that the second top commander was fired on the same day as the secret nuke transfer report.
When we look back at the ’2007 United States Air Force nuclear weapons incident’, where nukes were reported missing
from the Minot Air Force Base with no official suspect, the media went into turmoil and investigations were
launched immediately. Even CNN covered the event in depth and continued to investigate what was going on. The CNN
reporter even stated that “this kind of thing is not supposed to happen” in response to the event:
But where is the mainstream media now? Once again, it is
up to us to get the word out and demand answers. My respect goes out to Michael Savage for demanding answers on
such a pertinent and real issue.
Radio host calls for media attention over missing nuke
report and termination of top nuke commanders
Since Alex Jones and I originally reported on the high
level military intelligence
revealing that an unsigned nuclear weapons transfer had taken place back on September 3rd, an absurdly
high number of red flag events lending credibility to the intel have followed. From the termination of the second
highest nuke commander in the country
on the exact same day as the leak, to Senator Lindsey Graham warning of a nuclear
strike on the exact destination of the missile transfer — the red alert scenarios continue to pile up.
And now, Michael Savage of Savage Nation is launching an investigation into the issue and calling upon the media
to properly address the situation.
I joined the Savage Nation to discuss the intel timeline of the nuke transfer, specifically highlighting the
fact that the transfer was unsigned for and completely off the books. Originally covered by Savage earlier
this month following the suspension and termination of the two top nuke commanders in the nation, the
missing nuke intel has since spread internationally — and still, the United States media has failed to even mention
it despite the vital events that continue to point towards its accuracy.
But that fact is nothing new, considering the reality that even the local media was quick to ignore sources
revealing the unsigned transfer to them. As usual, the mainstream media is deathly afraid of crossing the
establishment. After all, it’s who grants them their reach (and oftentimes funding).
The brief report from the top level military source, which was written in a rush to get the information out,
“Dyess is beginning to move out nuclear war heads today. I got a tap from DERMO earlier. He said it was the
first time they have been even acknowledged since being put there in the 80′s. No signature was required for
transfer… There was no directive. He said that Dyess Commander was on site to give authority to release. No one
knew where they were going really, but the truck driver said to take them to South Carolina and another pick up
will take them from there.”
Anthony Gucciardi is a writer, analyst, and Founder of Storyleak.com whose articles are routinely featured on
top sites like Drudge Report and regularly appears on national and international television media.
This article was posted: Monday, October 28, 2013 at 11:57 am
The first nuclear bomb
explosion at the Trinity site in New Mexico, July 16, 1945. The United States is the only country to have used
a nuclear weapon, resulting in the death of around 200,000 people, mostly civilians. Photo: Los Alamos National
During a press conference in the Netherlands today, Obama said he is more worried
about Manhattan getting nuked than any supposed threat posed by Russia.
The president made the remark after a reporter asked him if former challenger Mitt
Romney was correct in his assertion that Russia is once again the primary foe of the United States following
Crimeans voting to rejoin Russia.
“Russia’s actions are a problem. They don’t pose the No. 1 national security threat
to the United States. I continue to be much more concerned when it comes to our security with the prospect of a
nuclear weapon going off in Manhattan,” Obama said.
Obama did not elaborate on the threat.
North Korea has threatened to nuke the United States on several occasions. Last
April, the Defense Intelligence Agency concluded with “moderate confidence” North Korea has a
nuclear weapon small enough to be loaded on a ballistic missile. However, according to the DIA, the reliability
of the missile would be low.
California is approximately 3,000 miles from Manhattan. In order to nuke New York,
the North Koreans would require a missile capable of traveling around 9,000 miles.
The next suspect on the Axis of
Evil list the government has claimed for over a decade wants to do us harm is Iran. It currently does not have a
nuclear bomb and, in fact, has not enriched uranium to the level required for a bomb, and also does not possess a missile capable of striking the United States. In January, Secretary of
State John Kerry insisted Iran has pledged to stop stockpiling uranium.
In 2010, Obama said al-Qaeda is trying to get nukes and would have “no compunction in using
them.” He added if “there was ever a detonation in New York City, or London, or Johannesburg, the ramifications
economically, politically and from a security perspective would be devastating.”
U.S. intelligence officials, however, say the al-Qaeda nuclear threat is, at best, a
“At this point, they don’t appear to have made much progress, but we continue to
review every bit of information that comes in to determine whether they’ve advanced their efforts in any way
whatsoever,” an anonymous intelligence official told CNN in 2010. “Developing a nuclear device involves a highly sophisticated technical
process, and al-Qaeda doesn’t seem to have mastered it based on what we know now.”
Obama apparently does not consider Russia a threat, although it currently has around
45,000 nuclear weapons and a sophisticated ballistic missile system.
Russia, according to Obama, is a “regional power that is threatening some of its
immediate neighbors, not out of strength, but out of weakness.”
Obama made the remark while speaking with Dutch Prime
Minister Mark Rutte after a nuclear security summit in The Hague. Russia attended the summit and endorsed the meeting’s final statement on enhancing nuclear security.
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Dmitry Rogozin threatened to use nuclear weapons if Moscow was attacked. He made the
remark following discussions about missile defense systems installed in Eastern Europe by the United States.
“One can experiment as long as one wishes by deploying non-nuclear warheads on
strategic missile carriers,” Rogozin said. “But one should keep in mind that if there is an attack against us, we
will certainly resort to using nuclear weapons in certain situations to defend our territory and state
This article was posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 at 1:25 pm
Feds warn of “imminent” terror threat on U.S.
According to high level sources, ISIS terrorist are operating in
Ciudad Juarez on the border across from the city of El Paso, Texas.The sources state
ISIS operatives will use vehicle born improvised explosive devices in the attacks. Homeland Security, Justice
and Defense Department agents have been placed on high alert “and instructed to aggressively work all possible
leads and sources concerning this imminent terrorist threat,” Judicial Watch reports. The attack is “coming
very soon” the high-level source warned. It is speculated an attack will happen on the anniversary of the
September 11, 2001 terror attacks.“An attack is so
imminent that the commanding general at Ft. Bliss, the U.S. Army post in El Paso, is being briefed, another
source confirms. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not respond to multiple inquiries from Judicial
Watch, both telephonic and in writing, about this information,” reports Judicial Watch.
How could there be aWar on Terror and actually say that we're having
awar against terrorism, and leave the
borders wide open? If you were the President of the United States, or I were the President of the United States,
and9/11 really happened the way they
want us to believe it happened, the first thing you would do is shut down the borders, so people couldn't get in
the country to harm you. But they left the borders wide open. Becausethe bankers want the borders open, because they want
aone-world government. They
want a North American Union. They don't want borders
here.9/11 was only a manifestation.
It was done to create afear in the
American public, so that we willobey what they want us to do.
Today The Blaze is reporting from their sources for the reasons why the changes are happening.
The timing comes as the five branches of the U.S. armed forces are reducing staff due to budget cuts, and as
U.S. troops are expected to withdraw from Afghanistan next year.
“I think they’re using the opportunity of the shrinkage of the military to get rid of people that don’t agree
with them or not tow the party line. Remember, as (former White House chief of staff) Rahm Emanuel said, never
waste a crisis,” a senior retired general told TheBlaze on the condition of anonymity because he still provide
services to the government and fears possible retribution.
“Even as a retired general, it’s still possible for the administration to make life miserable for us. If we’re
working with the government or have contracts, they can just rip that out from under us,” he said.
Retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, an outspoken critic of the Obama administration, said the White House
fails to take action or investigate its own, but finds it easy to fire military commanders “who have given their
lives for their country.”
“Obama will not purge a civilian or political appointee because they have bought into Obama’s ideology,” Vallely
said. “The White House protects their own. That’s why they stalled on the investigation into fast and furious,
Benghazi and Obamacare. He’s intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a
superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.”
In Obama’s America, the military must forsake their
constitutional oath in favor of blind allegiance to their new commander. And whether it’s top nuke
commanders being removed for failing to play ball with the global elite, or just silencing potential
whistleblowers, top military generals are now speaking out about the ‘mass purge’ within the United States
One such general, a
recipient of the Medal of Honor, has now gone on record in speaking with news
organization WND about the mass culling of high level military officers on behalf of the Obama administration.
Retired Army Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady says that the attack on high level military personnel is so great that it
has now obliterated the morale of troops at large, but is more importantly centered in terminating any high
level individual that will not go along with the plan.
“There is no doubt he (Obama) is intent on emasculating the military and will fire anyone who disagrees with
him,” the retired general told WND.
General Brady’s admission comes just after two of the top nuclear commanders in the United States were
terminated and suspended amid the high level military intelligence we
released surrounding the secret transfer of nuclear weapons from a Texas Airforce base to South Carolina.
And while the terminations were originally reported on by the Associated Press, who has been covering the issue in
depth and even hinting towards our coverage of the missing nuke within their reports, it was revealed by the agency
that the terminations and suspensions were actually found out through leaked emails.
In other words, the mass purge of military officials was never truly intended to meet the public eye. But even
in the face of government secrecy surrounding the issue, numerous news organizations and media figures have now
come out and highlighted the purge of top nuke commanders and others. From Michael Savage
launching an investigation into the missing nuke issue and calling for answers, to WND questioning officials over the military
Overall, the new media has forced this issue into the spotlight, reaching millions with the powerful information
that has been confirmed time and time again by scenarios like Senator Lindsey Graham’s same day speech regarding a nuclear
strike on the exact destination of the nuclear warheads. Meanwhile, the establishment has been busy in attempting
to eliminate high level military officers who will not blindly follow commander Obama on his every unconstitutional
After multiple top generals described to WND what they
regard as a full-scale “purge” of the U.S. military by the Obama administration, the commander of U.S. Army
Garrison Japan was summarily relieved of duty and his civilian deputy reassigned, pending a “misconduct”
Nine generals and flag officers have been relieved of duty under Obama just
this year – widely viewed as an extraordinary number – and several sources put the total number of senior
officers purged during the five years of the Obama administration as close to 200.
In response, prominent retired generals – ranging from Army Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely, a Fox News senior
military analyst, to Lt. Gen. William G. Boykin, a founder of the Army’s elite Delta Force, to Medal of Honor
recipient Maj. Gen. Patrick Henry Brady – have all gone on the record with WND, characterizing Obama’s actions as nothing less than an all-out
attack on America’s armed forces.
Obama is traitorously attempting to emasculate the U.S. military by
conducting a purge of the top ranks, according to retired Army Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady.
“There is no doubt he (Obama) is intent on emasculating the military and will fire anyone who disagrees with
him,” Brady told WorldNetDaily last week.
Disagreeing on issues such as “homosexuals, women in foxholes, the Obama sequester” will result in early
retirement. In the past year alone nine generals have been purged from the Pentagon’s ranks. “They are purging
everyone” a source told WND.
“Over the past three years, it is unprecedented for the number of four-star generals to be relieved of duty, and
not necessarily relieved for cause,” retired Army Lt. Gen. William G. “Jerry” Boykin told F. Michael Maloof. “I
believe there is a purging of the military,” he added. “The problem is worse than we have ever seen.”
Boykin also cited reports indicating 197 military officers had been removed by the Obama administration over the
last five years.
Boykin pointed to the early retirement of Gen. Stanley A.
McChrystal, who criticized the Obama administration. McChrystal was forced to retire after an article penned by
freelance journalist Michael Hastings appeared in Rolling Stone. Hastings later died under mysterious circumstances.
The greatest purge in U.S. military history has delivered a decisive blow to morale and poses a dangerous
weakness to the readiness of troops, warned the U.S. Army’s Chief of Staff, Gen. Raymond Odierno, last month.
Currently there are only two Army brigades — between 7,000 to 10,000 troops — that are rated as combat-ready,
less than one-third required for national security requirements, the General explained. “Right now we have in the
Army two brigades that are trained. That’s it. Two,”
Odierno said in October.
Litmus Test for Firing On American Citizens
In January of this year 2009 Nobel Peace Prize nominee Jim
Garrow told Alex Jones and Infowars he was informed by a top military veteran that the Obama
administration’s “litmus test” for new military leaders hinges on if they will obey orders to fire on U.S.
“I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new ‘litmus test’ in
determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders,” Garrow wrote on his Facebook page. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US
citizens or not. Those who will not are being removed.”
During the Clinton administration in the mid-1990s, similar accusations were made after a survey was given to U.S. Marines at the 29 Palms
Marine Corps base in California. The survey allegedly asked the soldiers if they would “fire upon U.S. citizens who
refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the United States government.”
In addition, a former Navy SEAL, Ben Smith, said last month that the Obama administration is asking top brass in the military
if they would be comfortable with disarming U.S. Citizens.
“Going back to the beginning of this administration, I’ve had friends within the community talking about how
they were brought in and questioned with people from more towards the top side and the questioning… where it was
pointing was do you feel comfortable disarming American citizens,” Smith told the Alex Jones Show on October
On October 25, a caller to the Alex Jones Show provided footage shot during a FEMA meeting revealing the mindset
of the government concerning the Second Amendment and the ability of citizens to protect themselves during a civil
emergency. “When the military moves in on your street,” an unidentified official stated during the meeting, “they
are now saying you have no more rights.”
Stalin and Hitler Conducted Political Purges of the Military
Obama’s military purge brings to mind Stalin’s purge between October 1940 and
February 1942 of the Red Army. This purge is part of a larger Soviet historiography that saw the imprisonment and
execution of more than 20,000,000 political enemies by the Soviet secret police and the NKVD.
Stalin and the NKVD were also responsible for purging the Polish military in 1940 and executing around 22,000
officers. Known as the Katyn
massacre, the purge was blamed on Nazi Germany by Stalin. The Russian government denied it was responsible for
the atrocity until 1990.
Other infamous military purges include Hitler’s Night of the Long Knives in 1934. In addition to purging the
street fighting SA faction of the German military after Hitler consolidated power, resulting in murder of Ernst
Röhm and the SA leadership, the operation included liquidating the so-called left-wing Strasserist faction of the
Nazi Party and the wholesale execution of Nazi opponents.
This article was posted: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 at 12:17 pm
LeeAnn report : "DEA Doesn't Want Legal Marijuana Cutting Into Their Illegal Profits"
Drug Smuggling DEA calls Marijuana Legalization 'Reckless and Irresponsible' http://www.infowars.com/drug-smugglin...
The powerful fiction film The Purge, is a near future
window into the choices we have to make.