welcome
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
But if Bush the decider in chief is determined to multiply his war
crimes by attacking Iran, or giving Israel a green light (or not issuing a red light) to do so with the promise of
U.S. military backup, what can be done to prevent such a war from taking place? I see only one solution: the troops. The
troops? But they are the ones who will be doing the fighting. Exactly. Bush, Cheney, Gates,
Petraeus, the secretaries, under secretaries, and assistant secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, and the
members of the Joints Chiefs of Staff won’t be lifting a finger against Iran. Only U.S. troops — the ones who will suffer and bleed and die for a lie —
will be fighting an illegal, immoral war against Iran. But because it is only the troops that will be doing the
dirty work, and because the troops greatly outnumber their commanders in the field and the bureaucrats in the
Pentagon, and because it’s impossible for the American people to support the troops in their war effort if the
troops themselves refuse to prosecute the war — the troops refusing to fight is the only sure-fire way to prevent a
war with Iran. Now, for this to happen, it is apparent that the hearts and minds of the
troops must be changed. The troops need to see that Iran is not a threat to the United States, that Iran is not a
threat to Israel, that Iran doesn’t have a nuclear weapon, that Iran is perfectly justified if it obtained a
nuclear weapon, that the U.S. military is stretched to the breaking point, that the president has no constitutional
authority to begin a war with Iran, and that the American people will support them in their decision. The troops
need to see that an attack on Iran would be unnecessary, unwise, unjust, illegal, immoral, and in violation of the
Constitution they swore to uphold. It would be anything but fighting to defend our freedoms. The troops need to see
that attacking Iran perverts the purpose of the military. Defending the United States against attack or invasion is
admirable; attacking and invading foreign countries is not. In defense of the United States, the U.S. military
should guard U.S. borders, patrol U.S. coasts, and enforce no-fly zones over U.S. skies. It should not do these
things in other countries, and should certainly not induce other countries to do these things because of a threat
by the United States. The troops need to see that American foreign policy is responsible for much evil throughout
the world. It is contrary to the wise, noninterventionist foreign policy of the Founding Fathers. So contrary in
fact that the Founders wouldn’t recognize what their constitutional, federated republic has become. Fighting an
offensive, foreign war perpetuates an evil U.S. foreign policy. The troops need to see that they are the ones who
will be responsible for waging an unjust war. They are the ones who will be dropping the bombs and firing the
bullets. They are the ones who will be doing the wounding and killing. They are the ones who will be destroying
property and infrastructure. The troops need to see that there are some orders that they just shouldn’t obey — even
if they come directly from their commander in chief. Why is it that Americans insist that German soldiers should
have disobeyed any commands to kill Jews, but that American soldiers should always obey their superiors? In
reality, however, Americans really don’t believe that all orders should be obeyed. If an American soldier were
ordered to kill the president or to kill his mother, we would condemn him if he obeyed. What we really expect of
our soldiers is to unconditionally obey any order that involves the killing of any foreigner in any country. But
this is something that no soldier with an ounce of morality should do. If the troops don’t see these things, then
war with Iran will come should the president be dumb enough, and evil enough, to order an attack, an invasion, a
regime change, or a preemptive strike. But if the troops do see these things, war with Iran will be impossible.
Bush, or any future president, can try to lie the country into war as much as he wants, but the troops refusing to
fight an unjust war will prevent any conflict from occurring. If a U.S. soldier really wants to be a hero, he
should refuse to fight in any foreign war. “Cursed be he that taketh reward to slay an innocent person”
(Deuteronomy 27:25). -- HOW TO PREVENT A WAR WITH
IRAN by Laurence M. Vance 7/14/08 ** Please Give Page Time To Load **
400 Prophets of Ahab; 1 Prophet of
GOD More
False Flag Attacks Are Coming
While Democrats and Republicans are acting out their ongoing left-right charade for the distraction of the American people, the real agenda of the gamemakers in charge of both parties in Washington, D.C., progresses without notice. That agenda, of course, is WAR. Perpetual war is what drives both America’s economic and political interests. And Donald Trump has already proven himself to be a fully controlled toady of the military-industrial complex by carrying out two military attacks on Syria (not to mention ongoing missile attacks, drone attacks, bombings, etc., all over the Middle East), both of which were clearly predicated on phony false flag chemical attacks blamed on the Syrian government but were actually launched by U.S./Israel/Saudi Arabia/Great Britain-backed terrorists, such as ISIS, al-Nusra, White Helmets, etc. Well, the signs are ubiquitous that more false flag chemical attacks are on the way. Many foreign news sources have investigated and reported on the phony evidence justifying America’s constant use of military force, but the American people are never told any of this by our own national media, as it is nothing more than a propagandist mouthpiece for the Washington War Machine. Right now, the foreign media is abuzz with the signs of another false flag chemical attack on the horizon, giving Donald Trump the “justification” in launching new attacks against Syria. For example, according to this recent report: In a move that was entirely predictable, the US administration is once again threatening to bomb Syria if there is a “chemical weapons attack.” This was entirely predictable because that chemical attack script has been read out, with salty crocodile tears, fake concern, and mocked indignation by US talking heads over the years - since 2012, in fact, when former US President Obama himself drew his red line on Syria. The latest script-reader to toe the chemical hoax line is President Trump's national security adviser, John Bolton, who on August 22, stated: “...if the Syrian regime uses chemical weapons we will respond very strongly and they really ought to think about this a long time.” Beyond the tattered veil of moral superiority that is US war propaganda, Bolton's words were clearly a very public command to Al-Qaeda and co-extremists to stage yet another fake chemical attack. Bolton's statement was preceded by an August 21 France-UK-US (FUKUS) joint statement, likewise threatening further illegal bombing of Syria if a chemical attack in Syria occurred (based on evidence the US never has nor needs to reveal). Recall that the last time they acted on such a threat, in April 2018, the US and its interventionist allies didn't even wait for the Douma lie to be exposed, let alone for any mythical evidence to materialize, before they illegally bombed Syria with 103 missiles. The bombings occurred before the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) had a chance to visit the Douma sites in question. It seems that FUKUS' appetite for destroying Syria wasn't satiated in April 2018, nor in the April 2017 bombings of Syria following unsubstantiated allegations around Khan Sheikhoun, Idlib. Bolton's assertions are backed by the usual suspects of the corporate media, fake human rights groups, “media activists”, and individuals linked to NATO's Atlantic Council war propaganda think tank. Chemical weapons accusations are among the most overused war propaganda tactics during the war on Syria. From late 2012 to April 2018, NATO's mouthpieces have screamed bloody chlorine or sarin. But time and again, they've been revealed as intellectually-challenged, supremely-unoriginal liars, to put it politely. Less shrill voices have pointed out the many occasions where so-called “rebels” had access to sarin, control over a chlorine factory, and motives for an attack to occur, among other prudent points. Some of the more loudly blasted claims were: March 2013, in Khan al-Assal, Aleppo; August 2013, in eastern Ghouta areas; April 2017, in Khan Sheikhoun, Idlib; and April 2018, in Douma, eastern Ghouta. READ FULL ARTICLE HERE: LINK
LEARN MORE HERE: SYRIA , False Flag Event , FALSE LEFT-RIGHT PARADIGM
---------------------------------------------
No War With
Iran! AdamKokesh https://www.change.org/p/us-military-... ADAM VS THE MAN is back with videos M-F.
The War Party Is At It
Again
Trade a Democrat for a Republican; trade a liberal for a conservative: It doesn’t matter. The War Party remains in charge either way. The people who thought they were voting for Donald Trump because he would extricate America from these endless foreign wars should realize by now that he is just another wuss for the War Party. Donald Trump has expanded America’s bombing wars against Somalia and Syria. He has expanded America’s drone attacks against Pakistan and Yemen. He has expanded America’s ground war in Afghanistan. U.S. wars in Iraq and Libya have never stopped. U.S. wars have killed over 500,000 people (mostly innocent civilians) in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan alone. Now Trump is sending 1,000 troops to Russia’s border in Poland. He is sending an additional 1,000 troops (the real number could be 5 or 10 times that) to the Middle East. What most of us are not hearing reported is that Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan (CFR) told top national security aides that the Pentagon has plans to send 120,000 U.S. troops to the Middle East. Coincidentally, this is the exact same number of U.S. forces that were used in the invasion of Iraq. Trump has already sent nuclear-capable B-52 bombers to the Middle East. He has sent the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group to the Middle East. He is sending U.S. warships to the tip of China’s territorial waters. He is sending U.S. military jets and bombers to the tip of Russia’s airspace. He is threatening overt war with Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba and Iran. At least 5,000 U.S. troops have been rushed to Venezuela’s border-neighbor, Colombia. In addition, Trump has issued economic sanctions against India, Mexico, Turkey, the European Union (with 28 member states) and, of course, China, Russia, Venezuela and Iran. For anyone who understands the way sanctions work, each of these sanctions, by themselves, could rightly be considered as an act of war. Hundreds of thousands (maybe millions) of little children, elderly people, the sick and infirmed, etc., are right now starving to death all over the world as a direct result of Trump’s economic sanctions against their countries. Mr. Trump, have you ever seen a child starve to death? And, of course, Trump is bypassing Congress to send billions of dollars of sophisticated arms and munitions to the Sunni/Wahhabi terrorist state of Saudi Arabia. Trump is bypassing Congress again to execute wars against Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba and Iran. It is no hyperbole to say that Donald Trump sees himself as an emperor, not a president. And Trump is not shy about admitting it. In his recent ABC interview with George Stephanopoulos, Trump bellowed, “I run the country.” It seems that America’s founders went to a lot of trouble for nothing to create a constitutional republic, because, with the help of evangelical Christians and conservative Republicans, Donald Trump is rapidly—and I do mean rapidly—turning America into a monarchy. But in reality, Trump is more of a mafia don than a monarch. And why not? Trump spent his entire business career learning how to skirt the law, truth, decency, honesty and all things upright from the best cons, killers and thugs in the business: Zionist mafia bosses. And Trump is now their star pupil. I’m really tired of hearing my Christian conservative friends say that Donald Trump means well, but he just listens to bad advice. Humbug! That miserable attempt at apologizing for Trump is really getting old. Donald Trump knows exactly what he is doing. He is doing what he fully intended to do from day one. He is doing what he was trained all of his life to do. Donald Trump is the consummate Zionist stooge. He has bewitched Christians and conservatives with his phony religious rhetoric and overt pandering to Israel. Of course, Christians were already poised and ready for a deceiver like Trump to come along. Ever since the end of World War II, America’s evangelical churches have dispensed the devilish and diabolical doctrines of dispensational futurism, which turned them into willing vassals of all things Israel. Trump’s most influential and trusted staff members have all been Zionist warmongers. I’m talking about Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, National Security Advisor John Bolton (CFR), former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan (CFR), Special Envoy (translate: war planner) to Venezuela Elliott Abrams (CFR), former Deputy National Security Advisor K.T. McFarland (CFR), Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin (CFR), Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross (Bilderberg), CIA Director Gina Haspel, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, Senior Advisor to the President Jared Kushner (Bilderberg), Ambassador to Israel David Friedman, et al. As an aside, Shanahan caught everyone off guard when he announced last Tuesday that he was leaving the Pentagon. The timing of his departure is most curious. Why would a defense secretary leave his post just as Donald Trump is on the verge of launching at least two wars? There is something significant behind this move. But don’t worry, folks, Trump is replacing Shanahan with another CFR Zionist warmonger, now former secretary of the Army, Mark Esper. But I digress. America’s penchant for starting wars [is] very often based upon lies or false premises. False flag operations mean having an attack blamed upon another nation which actually was not the culprit. Syria’s questionable fault for gassing of innocent civilians was used by Washington to bomb its Air Force. Now Secretary of State Pompeo has set us up by publicly stating that any attack on any American soldier in Iraq or Syria would cause America to attack Iran. He’s put every soldier at risk of death by some Israeli or Saudi fanatic. Both Secretary of State Pompeo and Vice President Pence are profound end times Evangelicals [translate: Israel-based dispensational futurists]. In 2017 I wrote, Iraq, Syria, Iran…Are We To Destroy Iran Next? about the original neo-conservative program to re-mold the Middle East. A main new concern is Trump’s Secretary of State’s strong evangelical beliefs in the end times. The NY Times describes his beliefs [in] The Rapture and the Real World: Pompeo Blends Belief and Policy. The belief is that a stronger and greater Israel will bring about Armageddon sooner and their rapture straight to heaven. Destroying Iran’s being a threat to Israel is thus seen as helping God’s intentions. The FT also links to a Guardian article quoting Pompeo, “Pompeo told a church congregation in Wichita three years ago. “It is a never-ending struggle . . . until the rapture. Be a part of it. Be in the fight.” Pompeo’s actions as a “Christian Zionist” are described in a New Republic article The Christianization of US Foreign Policy. I know what they were trying to say, but the New Republic article titled The Christianization of US Foreign Policy is badly misnamed. What it should be called is The Judaization of US Foreign Policy, because, for the most part, evangelical Christianity in the U.S. has been completely co-opted by Zionist-Judaism (which is not Judaism at all, but a political/racial supremacist ideology that uses war to force its will upon any country that opposes it). Philip Giraldi sums up the war doctrine of Mike Pence’s Christian Zionism perfectly: On May 25th Vice President Mike Pence was the featured speaker at the United States Military Academy commencement. His speech was predictably an encomium celebrating both the diversity and the success of the newly commissioned officers as well as of the system at West Point that had produced them, but it also included interesting insights into how he and the other non-veterans who dominate the policy making in the White House see the military. Most media commentary on the speech was either shocked or pleasantly surprised by Pence's prediction that the graduating officers would soon be at war. He said, "It is a virtual certainty that you will fight on a battlefield for America at some point in your life. You will lead soldiers in combat. It will happen. Some of you will join the fight against radical Islamic terrorists in Afghanistan and Iraq. Some of you will join the fight on the Korean Peninsula and in the Indo-Pacific, where North Korea continues to threaten the peace, and an increasingly militarized China challenges our presence in the region. Some of you will join the fight in Europe, where an aggressive Russia seeks to redraw international boundaries by force. And some of you may even be called upon to serve in this hemisphere.” Pence's choice of words is revealing. There is a "virtual certainty" of "fight[ing] on a battlefield for America" and that battlefield is global, including both transnational Islamic terrorism and the western hemisphere. The language implies that American security requires "full spectrum dominance" everywhere. It encompasses traditional national enemies, with a Pyongyang that "threatens peace," a China that is "militarized," and a Russia that is both "aggressive" and expansionistic. The soldiers must be prepared to fight "when not if that day comes." First of all, it is discouraging to note that Pence believes that a war or wars must take place, and further, one must have to wonder exactly what scenarios are envisioned by Pence, and also presumably by his boss and colleagues, regarding precisely how war against other nuclear powers will play out. Nor does he entertain what would happen when the rest of the world begins to perceive the United States as its enemy due to its willingness to interfere in everyone's politics. And the American soldiers would die not knowing what they were fighting for, since they would understand from the onset that it had nothing to do with the defense of the United States. The speech is, in short, a recognition that the Trump Administration sees perpetual war on the horizon, a viewpoint that is particularly alarming as one can quite easily make the case that the United States is not seriously threatened at all by anyone on Pence's enemies list and is therefore the aggressor. China is a regional power, Russia does not have the resources or will to reestablish the Soviet Union, and North Korea has only limited capability to attack anyone, even if it should choose to do so. Islamic terrorism is largely a creation of the United States in the first place and maintains its potency by the adverse impact of the continued US presence in Muslim lands. And the suggestion that Venezuela and/or Cuba might be a threat to America is, quite frankly, laughable. If Mike Pence is seriously interested in looking around to see who has been most interested in starting new wars, he should look to gentlemen named Bush and Obama, not to mention his own colleagues John Bolton and Mike Pompeo. And then there are Washington's feckless allies Israel and Saudi Arabia, who are keen to advance their own interests by means of piles of dead American soldiers. As I said, trade a Democrat for a Republican; trade a liberal for a conservative: It doesn’t matter. The War Party remains in charge either way. Here’s one more example: The only current presidential candidate of either party that is truly anti-war is Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard. Tulsi is a four-term congresswoman and a combat veteran of the Iraq War. Again, Philip Giraldi has the story: In a recent interview with Fox News’s Tucker Carlson, Gabbard doubled down on her anti-war credentials, telling the host that war with Iran would be “devastating,” adding that “I know where this path leads us and I’m concerned because the American people don’t seem to be prepared for how devastating and costly such a war would be… So, what we are facing is, essentially, a war that has no frontlines, total chaos, engulfs the whole region, is not contained within Iran or Iraq but would extend to Syria and Lebanon and Israel across the region, setting us up in a situation where, in Iraq, we lost over 4,000 of my brothers and sisters in uniform. A war with Iran would take far more American lives, it would cost more civilian lives across the region… Not to speak of the fact that this would cost trillions of taxpayer dollars coming out of our pockets to go and pay for this endless war that begs the question as a soldier, what are we fighting for? What does victory look like? What is the mission?” Due to her strong anti-war convictions, Gabbard is being savagely attacked by her own Democrat Party and is being all but totally censored by the mainstream media. As I have said over and over: There is only one party in Washington, D.C., and it’s the War Party. And they are at it again. P.S. This is the second notice that we are currently printing and distributing the most important liberty documents in U.S. history. It’s called THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS. This giant book is an excellent resource for high school and college students—as well as homeschoolers. Pastors, teachers, physicians, business owners, attorneys and judges have purchased THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS with extreme satisfaction. The Tennessee State Supreme Court ordered several copies of THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS. Plus, a county sheriff recently ordered copies for each of his deputies. I believe you will be just as pleased as they are with this wonderful compilation of American documents. You can have these great documents at your fingertips in one beautifully bound, easy-to-read format. These are the documents that gave birth to the greatest free nation on earth. Again, nowhere else can you find these documents complete in one volume under one title. And our supply is very limited and will not last long. Order THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS now! To read my initial column explaining THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS, go here. © Chuck Baldwin
REACH OUT TO OTHERS [Help Educate Family And Friends With This Page]
Subversion | Pawns On The Chessboard | Asleep at the
Switch
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
