" Look Into It - Home Part 1

 

 

 

 
  
                                               

welcome

 

 

<< Previous    [1]  2  3    Next >>

The leaders of the past beckon us to get involved, and encroaching despotism before us demands it! Get Busy -> Look Into It

 

The main purpose of this site is to stock information, materials, and resources in defending against political/geopolitical corruption and its vast power, which is drastically changing your life and the lives of everyone you know (for the worse). Example: Are you familiar with The False Left-Right Paradigm?...Zionism/Christian Zionism?...The Military Industrial Complex?...NDAA?  The Govt Assassinating American Citizens?  The violations of Posse Comitatus, and Patriot Act?  What about Codex Alimentarius?  The WTO?...or the IMF World Bank?  The Federal Reserve?  Cashless Trackable Society?  Eugenics?  Transhumanism?  Organ Harvesting?  If you've never heard about this stuff, or know very little, then you need to bookmark this site now and start to look into these issues...for they are affecting you severely. 




 

INFAMOUS 9/11  

   

Never Forget: 20 Years of Conquering at Home

First published at 17:18 UTC on September 10th, 2021.

Fear is the foundation of government power. And war is the “art of conquering at home.” Insight and warnings from the founders - plus even a glimmer of hope and inspiration for the future.

The War on Terror Has Always Been a War on You

First published at 17:54 UTC on September 1st, 2021.

From day one, they’ve attacked your liberty in big ways - and they’re not even close to being done yet.

 

https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/ 

 

 


   

Under the rubric of Zionism, the dispossession of Palestinians and annexation of their land has for decades been hidden in plain sight, along with Israeli apartheid and ethnic cleansing. Though tourism flows in steadily to "The Holy Land," masking these egregious past and present events from scrutiny, has been and is nothing short of Orwellian. The Zionist state of Israel is a totalitarian state, whose ideologues' sentiments match those advocating world government. As Rev. Chuck Baldwin exclaims, "For all intents and purposes, the Globalist agenda (the New World Order, call it what you will) and the Zionist agenda, are one and the same." The Trump Jones Deception 2, demonstrates this fact, and the way in which both Donald Trump and Alex Jones are a part of it.

https://israel.lookintoit.org
https://war.lookintoit.org

Uncompressed Version Here:
https://odysee.com/@look-into-it:f/TRUMPJONES-DECEPTION2:e

 

 

 

THE TRUMP JONES DECEPTION 2

Under the rubric of Zionism, the dispossession of Palestinians and annexation of their land has for decades been hidden in plain sight, along with Israeli apartheid and ethnic cleansing. Though tourism flows in steadily to "The Holy Land," masking these egregious past and present events from scrutiny, has been and is nothing short of Orwellian. The Zionist state of Israel is a totalitarian state, whose ideologues' sentiments match those advocating world government. As Rev. Chuck Baldwin exclaims, "For all intents and purposes, the Globalist agenda (the New World Order, call it what you will) and the Zionist agenda, are one and the same." The Trump Jones Deception 2, demonstrates this fact, and the way in which both Donald Trump and Alex Jones are a part of it.

https://israel.lookintoit.org
https://war.lookintoit.org

PLEASE WATCH AND SHARE.

Uncompressed Version Here:

ODYSEE:
https://odysee.com/@look-into-it:f/TRUMPJONES-DECEPTION2:e

------------

BITCHUTE:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/xBbfqb3qmU1m/

THE INTERNET ARCHIVE:
https://archive.org/details/the-trump-jones-deception-2

GORF TUBE:
https://gorf.tube/w/bnrbzb4HCpw3RR42gQQN9Y

 

 

WAR IS A RACKET! — Major General Smedley D. Butler

In 2009, less than two months after Barack Obama was inaugurated as president, Alex Jones/Infowars released a documentary (The Obama Deception) exposing him as a mask used by the corrupt power elite to instigate and provide cover to their machinations. Central to this presentation was the “real” executive power structure. “…The president serves the military industrial complex, itself owned by the international bankers.” However, in 2017, though Donald Trump was a puppet like his predecessor, Alex Jones promoted him as a maverick outside of this systemic corruption that has plagued America since Dwight D. Eisenhower coined the phrase, “Military Industrial Complex.” Using the war in Yemen—which has produced the greatest humanitarian crisis on earth—as a case example, The Trump Jones Deception shows how both men were yet another mask of deceit worn by the corrupt establishment. 

LEARN MORE HERE:
https://war.lookintoit.org/home/ 

Website Features:

DOCUMENTARY IN 1080p *ODYSEE UPLOAD*

SPIRITUAL WAR
https://war.lookintoit.org/spiritual-war/

PSYWAR
https://war.lookintoit.org/psywar/

FOREIGN POLICY
https://war.lookintoit.org/foreign-policy/

SECRET WARS
https://war.lookintoit.org/secret-wars/

WWI
https://war.lookintoit.org/wwi/

YEMEN WAR
https://war.lookintoit.org/yemen/

THE METHOD OF WAR
https://war.lookintoit.org/the-method/

WAR IS A RACKET!
https://war.lookintoit.org/war-is-a-racket/

NEWS
https://war.lookintoit.org/news/

 


 
chuck baldwin returns
Chuck Baldwin returned to pastor his local/online church, Liberty Fellowship, after having undergone emergency throat surgery. More Details Here: https://go.lookintoit.org/chuck-baldwin-returns/

 

WATCH ALL THREE ISRAEL PACKAGES HERE: The Israel Packages 

Live Stream Link

https://libertyfellowshipmt.com/Resources/LiveStream.aspx

Please join us each Sunday for Dr. Baldwin’s hard-hitting and relevant messages live-streamed from Kalispell, MT, on this page every Sunday afternoon at approximately 2:30pm Mountain Time.

 

 

 


 

 

JUNE 8, 1967

Loss of Liberty (Israeli False Flag Attack in 1967)


 

 

USS Liberty Survivor
Ron Kukal Testimonial

USS Liberty Veterans Association
Published on Jan 22, 2018

USS Liberty Survivor Ron Kukal shares his experience during the attack on the USS Liberty and continuing
cover-up of that attack by the US government.

 

 


My Interview With
A USS LIBERTY Survivor

https://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Articles/tabid/109/ID/4142/My-Interview-With-A-USS-LIBERTY-Survivor.aspx


Chuck Baldwin, published: Thursday, June 3, 2021

Next Tuesday (June 8, 2021) is the 54th anniversary of the unprovoked attack of the USS LIBERTY by the State of Israel that killed 34 American sailors and Marines and wounded 174. To this day, the State of Israel has never been held accountable for this despicable and dastardly attack against the people of the United States. In fact, the U.S. government and the news media have covered up this horrific attack for all of these decades.

I am using today’s column to print my recorded interview with a USS LIBERTY survivor. This man is a friend of mine. His name is Ron Kukal.

Ron was born in 1939. He grew up in Rushville, Nebraska, and now lives in Sheridan, Wyoming. He joined the Navy at the age of 20. He served 8 years in the Navy and had served 7 years when he was assigned to the LIBERTY. He was a first class petty officer and a communications supervisor on board the LIBERTY. Here is my interview with Ron Kukal (edited for space):

[Begin interview]

CB: Ron, why was the USS LIBERTY where it was in the Mediterranean Sea on June 8, 1967?

RK: We were first assigned to sail up and down the coast of Africa. We all know that the USS LIBERTY was an intelligence ship. And in the middle of our tour over there, we got a call that we were needed to go to the Med. And none of us really knew what it was all about.

CB: Obviously, your ship was not designed for combat.

RK: Absolutely not.

CB: And you were not there for the purpose of any aggressive action.

RK: Absolutely not.

CB: So the ship was pretty much by itself? You didn’t have protective ships around you or anything like that?

RK: The only thing we were told [is] that if something would happen to us, the 6th Fleet was only about a half an hour away by jet plane. I believe our captain did request some protection, but it was refused. And they just said, “You keep yourself in international waters, and don’t worry about it. Fly the American flag, and don’t worry about it.”

CB: And that’s what the captain did? You were in international waters, and your ship was clearly identified as a United States vessel flying the U.S. flag very clearly, right?

RK: Yes. All morning long we had reconnaissance planes, which were Israeli, flying around us. The flag was definitely up there, and we were well marked: large lettering on the bow and “USS LIBERTY” on the fantail. Very, very clearly marked.

CB: And, of course, Israel is supposedly a U.S. ally, so I assume that the captain and the officers on the ship did not perceive a threat from the State of Israel before the attack.

RK: At breakfast that morning, some of the guys who were working for me had come to me; they were all excited because of the reconnaissance planes that we were experiencing topside. And I told them, “There’s really nothing to worry about. If they are Israeli, we’re flying the flag, and they’re friendly. So don’t let it bother you. Let’s just go to work, and don’t let it occupy your mind.” And that’s the way everybody felt about the whole thing.

CB: So at what time of day was it when the attack actually began?

RK: The exact time was 14:01. 2:01 in the afternoon.

CB: And how long had you been in those waters where you were?

RK: Oh let’s see. That’s really a good question. I think we’d been there a couple of days. I’m pretty sure that we got there about the third day of the Six-Day War. And I think we were there a day or two before the attack began.

CB: Thank you. Where were you on the ship when the attack began?

RK: I was two decks below the main deck. About right at the water line is about where I was at.

CB: Did anybody on the ship have any reason to believe or suspect that they were going to be or might be attacked?

RK: No. We did have a General Quarters drill that day, which, as you know, gets everyone prepared for attacks which we might experience. We had just finished that General Quarters drill. We were just getting back to our own work spaces when the attack occurred. Pretty good time to attack somebody, I guess you might say. They are just all settled down after having a drill like that. So it was a good time, whoever ordered it. A great time. Everybody was pretty relaxed. There were guys on the top deck that were off duty sunbathing. And one of them, I think, was the executive officer, Philip Armstrong. And no, you wouldn’t say that anybody was expecting anything.

CB: And the drill you described would have been a routine matter, I would assume.

RK: This was probably a little bit more than routine. We did them routinely, but the captain—his words to us on the intercom, I think, were: “We are in a war zone, and we will do these General Quarters drills as much as possible.”

CB: But that would have been precautionary, right? He didn’t have any indication or reason to believe that an attack was imminent.

RK: No. None whatsoever. Yes, precautionary is a good way to put it.

CB: So how many officers and crew were on board the USS LIBERTY when it was attacked?

RK: The total was 294.

CB: How many were killed and wounded?

RK: 34 were killed: 25 down below where I was at and 9 topside. The wounded numbered 174. The ship itself is the most decorated crew for a single action in the United States Navy.

CB: When you first realized that you were under attack, did you realize that it was from the State of Israel?

RK: Oh no. No, we didn’t know that. The planes that attacked us were unmarked.

CB: They were unmarked. What kind of aircraft were attacking you?

RK: They were French Mirage jets.

CB: So when the attack occurred, it was machine gun fire. Were bombs dropped?

RK: When the planes attacked, it was limited to machine gun fire, cannon fire, rocket fire, and they tossed some napalm at us too.

CB: And were the aircraft reinforced with watercraft in the attack?

RK: I think it would be a half an hour to forty-five minutes into the attack [that] the torpedo boats showed up. They fired five torpedoes at us and hit us with one. The USS America was going to send help for us, and they [the U.S. government] turned those pilots around. I believe LBJ did that personally. I guess once he found out who was attacking us [Israel], he turned our help around.

CB: Do you believe that the Israelis fully intended to sink the ship?

RK: I certainly do! Yes. As a matter of fact, one of the Israeli pilots actually radioed back to—I don’t know if it was Ashdod or Tel Aviv or where it was—but said that he would not participate in this attack because it was an American ship. And those transcriptions and that voice has been on TV a couple of times where he literally said that he wouldn’t attack, and he turned back. They told him to turn around [to pursue the attack], but he flew back to their headquarters. He was jailed for several years, and when he got out of jail he came over to this country. And he actually went straight to former Congressman Pete McCloskey, and told him his story: that he would not attack an American ship.

CB: I remember reading somewhere about some of the fellows on the LIBERTY trying to escape—trying to get a lifeboat or something. Walk me through that. Was there actually fire on the men who were trying to get off the ship? Am I remembering that correctly?

RK: You are. It would be Lieutenant Lloyd Peters that could tell that story about as well as anyone. Because he literally was going to testify at the court of inquiry that they fired on our lifeboats, and they literally did not want any lifeboats out there for anybody. They wanted us all dead. And so they had to get rid of those [lifeboats].

The torpedo hit I’m guessing about 30 feet from me, maybe 40. And then you know the story. As soon as I got done with my prayers, an audible voice came to me (maybe it wasn’t audible—maybe just to me). “Get down, and get down now!” is all I remember of it. And then from that point to the point of me being either pushed—or somehow I ended up on the steel deck with my nose right on the steel—and the torpedo exploded, and the shrapnel was flying through the air. It took awhile for the water to get in there. Not very long, but you could hear the shrapnel flying through the air. Killed all the men around me. There was only myself and two or three other guys that escaped from down in that area.

CB: You said 25 men died down in that area?

RK: 25 in that area. That would have been the second deck down, the third deck, and the fourth deck down. That torpedo took—I think the height of that hole was something like 30-some feet. And so it encompassed a lot of decks. And it took all of the security group personnel; that was most of the men that died down there.

CB: So, after the torpedo hit and you were still alive (you and a couple of others), then what happened?

RK: I heard the shrapnel flying through the air, and then the whole compartment became an instant swimming pool. I got up off the deck, and I think the water was probably to my shoulders and still rising. And a battle lantern (which all ships have on them that automatically come on when you lose power) was shining over the hatchway to the ladder that led to the deck above. I knew I had to get through that hatch and get to the ladder and get to the deck above to keep from drowning. And there were a lot of guys trying to get up the same ladder, of course. But several of us got up through there, and the only way we got through the hatchway was—they have what they call a scuttle hole in there. It’s just big enough for a man to slip through; a small hole in the middle of the hatch. And most of the guys who were up on the top deck came down to help out. And they were helping pull us through that hole.

I immediately headed towards the main deck. I wanted to get out of there as quickly as possible just like everybody else. [I was] slipping and sliding in the passageways. What I was slipping and sliding in was mainly water and blood. And when I got topside, Lieutenant George Golden gave me an order to turn around and go back down below and make sure everybody got out. And so I went back down below and hollered down in that dark hole—you could hear the water sloshing around and stuff like that—trying to get some answers from somebody, and nobody answered.

CB: So I would assume by what you said that many of the men and the captain thought the ship was going to sink.

RK: Yes. And that whole night we were in danger of sinking. The following morning when the sun just came over the horizon, the destroyer USS Davis came over the horizon and came up alongside of us and brought some men over. Those men went down below where the torpedo had hit and shored up those bulkheads to keep us from going to the bottom. According to the officers and the commanders, the captain, everybody else, it was never a question of were we going to sink; the question was “when?” So yes, had the USS Davis not come alongside and sent their men over to help us, we probably wouldn’t be here today.

CB: And that was at dawn the following morning?

RK: Yeah. The sun was coming over the horizon. I suppose it was 6:30 or 7:00.

CB: You said that during the attack that U.S. aircraft were launched to come to your assistance from a U.S. aircraft carrier?

RK: USS America, yeah. That’s the aircraft carrier. I believe also the USS Saratoga launched some, and they were turned around.

CB: So those planes never arrived at your location to help you. Somebody ordered those planes to go back to the ship and to not come to your assistance?

RK: That’s correct. It was either McNamara or Johnson; I’m not sure which one it was.

CB: So either President Lyndon Johnson or Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara?

RK: That’s right.

CB: Do you believe that it was an act of God that the ship stayed afloat?

RK: There’s no question in my mind. If you take into consideration the firepower that they had compared to what we had. I don’t think that we ever fired a shot that I can remember.

CB: Do you believe there was a concerted effort by the White House and members of Congress to cover up that attack?

RK: Yes. Matter of fact, if you were to talk with Phil Turney, he will tell you that he and several others of the LIBERTY crewmen were called into a room and told that if they ever talked about this, they would be imprisoned and fined a huge amount of money.

CB: They were told that by a Naval officer?

RK: Yes. An admiral.

CB: An admiral. So when you say that there was a cover-up, that must have involved a lot of different people. So you are talking about a chain of command starting from the White House and going all the way down the command structure of the Navy?

RK: I guess if I could make it short and concise, I could tell you that Captain Ward Boston (who conducted the Board of Inquiry) before he died left his testimony that he was told to make the outcome of that Board that the attack was an accident. He said he had no choice. That’s written down in black and white. He was forced.

CB: So the official story from Washington—they finally did acknowledge that it was Israel that launched this attack, but then they claimed it was an accident. Was that the official story?

RK: That was the official story. Captain Boston told me, and he wrote some handwritten letters to me about this stuff. And he literally said that he was forced to make the outcome what the administration wanted—I guess what LBJ wanted.

CB: Has there ever been any due recognition for the men of the LIBERTY? You mentioned decorations.

RK: Decorations and medals were given to us, such as the Silver Star, the Bronze Star, the Navy Cross, and even the Congressional Medal of Honor. The problem is that, as I understand it, medals like we earned are only earned if you are attacked by an enemy state. You don’t get them for friendly fire. They come from being attacked by an enemy. That’s never ever been straightened out. I’ve asked about it a lot of times.

CB: That’s a very good point. What is your feeling about the State of Israel now? Do you consider the State of Israel an ally of the United States?

RK: No, I think that they—I’m talking mainly about the leadership in Israel—are Zionists. Pastor, I’ll be really truthful on this. I’ve been involved with the church for many, many years. I played the piano for a church several times; I was on worship teams several times. And one of my biggest mistakes at a church right here in my hometown of Sheridan, Wyoming, was I told the story about the LIBERTY, and I told it truthfully. And I’ve got to tell you, things got pretty cold there at that church for me.

CB: Amazing. So you perceive that this infatuation that most Christians have with the State of Israel is misplaced?

RK: I certainly do! I really don’t believe that physical Israel has a thing to do with Biblical Israel at all.

CB: I totally agree with you, Ron.

Has there ever been any of the crew that you’ve talked with—survivors of this attack—have you guys ever put your minds together and come up with anything that you could figure why Israel attacked you like they did? We know it was not an accident. We know it was deliberate. We know that it was not only deliberate but they intended to sink the ship and kill the entire crew.

RK: And people have said that in very high positions. The [deputy] director of the National Security Agency back then—I think his name was Louis Tordella—he knew it was no accident. I can quote Dean Rusk who said in his book As I Saw It, “[I] didn't believe the Israelis then, and I don’t believe them now.” That’s in his book. And people in very high places, including Head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Thomas Moorer, said it was no accident. Could not have been.

I believe it was the intent of Israel to sink the LIBERTY [and] blame it on Cairo, which would draw the U.S. into the war.

CB: Ron, your story is a testament to God’s sovereign power and grace in your life and the lives of all of those crew members that survived. But I think it’s also a story that needs to be told in regard to what Israel did, and that there has been no accountability for what they did, which suggests that there is an evil nature in this that transcends politics.

RK: Oh absolutely. I think I’ve said in a couple of interviews that I believe on June 8, 1967, we looked Satan in the eye and lived to tell about it.

CB: I believe that’s true. And I think that the cover-up proves the evil nature of the offenders.

RK: Oh I believe that to the hilt.

CB: Thank you, Ron. I’m sure this interview will help a lot of people.

[End interview]

Ladies and gentlemen, can you imagine what the reaction of the U.S. government would have been if the USS LIBERTY had been attacked by Iraq, Iran, Syria—or any other country, for that matter? Yet the U.S. government not only did nothing to protect the officers and crew of the USS LIBERTY as it was being attacked by the State of Israel but it also ordered the American fighter aircraft that were enroute to protect the LIBERTY to turn around. And then the government lied about the attack and ordered a massive cover-up of the attack so as to cast no blame on the attacking country: Israel. There is not another country in the world that would be given this kind of perverted preference by our government.

And as you heard Ron say, when Christians are confronted with the horrific evil that the State of Israel perpetrated against a virtually defenseless U.S. Navy ship, they react with utter indifference, unbelief or even anger that anyone would dare suggest that Israel is capable of such an atrocity.

The reason is, most Christians have been taught that Rothschild’s Israel created in 1948 is the rebirth of Biblical Israel. They have been brainwashed in the erroneous belief system that the modern Zionist State of Israel is the physical home of “God’s Chosen People.”

(To learn the truth, start with Romans 2:28, 29; Galatians 4:22 - 26; 6:12 - 16; Ephesians 1:3 - 10; Revelation 2:9; 3:9)

Christian Zionists such as John Hagee, Robert Jeffress, David Jeremiah, et al. have told Christians for over 70 years that in order to have God’s blessing, America must “bless” this modern Zionist State of Israel. That is a lie from the pits of Hell. The truth is, America’s massive support for Israel is one of the biggest reasons why God is now judging the United States so severely.

I have a 31-message, 3-Set DVD series that sets the record straight regarding the true Biblical teaching on Israel. The series is entitled The Israel Package.

Order Set One here.

Order Set Two here.

Order Set Three here.

I urge readers to order this series and share it with your friends and loved ones. Learn how a preacher (me) who believed (and taught) that modern Israel was Biblical Israel for over 30 years came to see the truth that modern Israel is actually a devilish Trojan Horse designed to deceive the Church and destroy America’s Christian heritage and culture—and to serve as a human headquarters for the globalist Deep State.

We also carry the blockbuster book that tells the true story of Israel’s attack against the USS LIBERTY, co-authored by the man quoted in this interview, Ron Kukal. The book is entitled Remember The LIBERTY! Almost Sunk By Treason On The High Seas.

Buy as many of these books as you can. We simply must help Ron and the LIBERTY survivors get the truth out about what happened on that fateful day on June 8, 1967.

 

MORE HERE: SUBVERSION | 9/11 | The Israel Packages

 


 


Things the Marine Corps Forgot to Mention

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2010/06/laurence-m-vance/for-parents/

(Excerpt) U.S. Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler (1881—1940) — a Congressional Medal of Honor winner who could never be accused of being a pacifist and the author of : War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses. I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then we’ll fight. The trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6 percent over here, then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100 percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag. I wouldn’t go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket. It may seem odd for me, a military man, to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent 33 years and 4 months in active service as a member of our country’s most agile military force — the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from second lieutenant to Major General. And during that period I spent most of my time being a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism. Butler also recognized the mental effect of military service: Like all members of the military profession I never had an original thought until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups.

The Book War Is A Racket
https://archive.org/details/war_is_a_racket_1903_librivox/warisaracket_01_butler_128kb.mp3

Who Is Smedley Butler?
- Questions For Corbett -

The Corbett Report

First published at 13:16 UTC on January 22nd, 2020

SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=34783

Have you heard of Major General Smedley Butler? If not, you might want to ask yourself why that is. As one of the most highly decorated Marines in the history of the US Marine Corps and as a passionate and eloquent speaker about the racket that is war, Smedley Butler deserves to be a household name. Find out more in today's edition of Questions For Corbett.

 


Dying In Deception
- Message by Dr. Chuck Baldwin -

LibertyFellowshipMT
Published on May 28, 2019

This message was preached by Pastor Chuck Baldwin on Sunday, May 26, 2019, during the service at Liberty Fellowship. To purchase a copy of this message or to support the fellowship, please visit LibertyFellowshipMT.com.

 

A Righteous, Honorable Death: Not All Men Share It
- Message by Dr. Chuck Baldwin -

LibertyFellowshipMT | May 31, 2021

This message was preached by Pastor Chuck Baldwin on Sunday, May 30, 2021, during the service at Liberty Fellowship.
To purchase a copy of this message or to support the fellowship, please visit LibertyFellowshipMT.com.
 
More: Asleep at the Switch

 

 

 

"And when you look at the key people in The Order
you will find that they generate conflict."

"...Out of conflict you've got profit, you've got political power, and you can direct history. And if you look at the writings for example of the Trilateral Commission, they talk openly in the Trilateral Commission
about managing conflict, not solving conflict but managing conflict."

-- Antony C. Sutton --

 

------------------------------
" T H E __M E T H O D "
------------------------------


"...What is really going on today is all based on deception. There is a small group of people who are of course financing our so called enemies to rally the people behind government, and that is intent on plunging the world into World War III. And the whole idea is to get the Muslims, and the Jews, and the Christians to destroy one another. And of course that's covered in my February 2007 newsletter where we simply quote the writings of Alice Bailey who was a mystic who actually channeled some twenty-five books from a demonic spirit named Djwal Khul. And in several of her books she talks about the necessity of precipitating this great final battle of mankind where the Jews, and the Christians, and the Muslims destroy one another. And after that will come The New World Order."


 

Summary



-- Dr. Stanley Monteith --


 

 

The War of Terror is A CIA-Sponsored PsyOp

corbettreport
Published on Feb 12, 2017
SHOW NOTES AND MP4: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=21807

While people on both sides of the phoney left/right divide squabble over terrorist boogeymen and Trump's CIA chief gives Saudi Arabia an award for "counter"terrorism, everyone has lost sight of the bigger picture: The blithering morons who are the face of international terror are aided, funded, controlled and handled by the intelligence agencies. It is all part of the con to get you scared of your own shadow so the terror-industrial complex can laugh all the way to the bank. Today James
breaks down the latest chapter in this never-ending psy-op saga.

 


War on Terror: Greatest Covert Op

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2010/083110b.html
https://www.lewrockwell.com/author/douglas-valentine/
 
https://www.globalresearch.ca/america-s-war-on-terrorism/14816
https://www.globalresearch.ca/mapping-a-world-from-hell-76-countries-are-now-involved-in-
washingtons-war-on-terror/5624988

 

 

Secret Wars of the CIA John Stockwell

A lecture by John Stockwell given in December, 1989 on the inner workings of the national security council and the CIA's covert actions in Angola, Central America and Vietnam.

John Stockwell is the highest-ranking CIA official ever to leave the agency and go public. He ran a CIA intelligence-gathering post in Vietnam, was the task-force commander of the CIA's secret war in Angola in 1975 and 1976, and was awarded the Medal of Merit before he resigned. Stockwell's book In Search of Enemies, published by W.W. Norton 1978, is an international best-seller.

Can be seen in parts here http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=...

PDF transcript of the lecture in October 1987 http://www.mediafire.com/view/?zr2b19...

Download the video here http://www.mediafire.com/?tkg2hl3tdjq...
Alternative Torrent link https://onebigtorrent.org/torrents/22...

 

 

I  R  A  Q
From The Grave They Plead Wake Up!


Charles Thomas 'Charlie' McGrath Jr.
1969-2016
Obituary

Published on Jun 13, 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCT19W0evG0
http://wideawakenews.com/donate.html

ATTACHED
http://www.antiwar.com/casualties/

 

 

 

 

 

9/11 According to Donald Trump


"This is the same Donald Trump who on the campaign trail told Fox & Friends, 'Who blew up the World Trade Center? It wasn't the Iraqis, it was Saudi--take a look at Saudi Arabia, open the documents.' Now, instead of opening the documents ON Saudi Arabia, Trump is opening the purse FOR Saudi Arabia."

-- Rev Chuck Baldwin: Globalists Using Donald Trump To Take America Into War, May 25, 2017 --

http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Articles/tabid/109/ID/3604/Globalists-Using-Donald-Trump-To-Take-America-Into-War.aspx

Learn More About 911 Here: INFAMOUS 9/11

 

“Who blew up the World Trade Center? It wasn’t the Iraqis, it was Saudi — take a look at Saudi Arabia, open the documents.”

-- Donald Trump Fox and Friends on the morning of February 17, 2016 --

Donald Trump You May Find The Saudis Were Behind The 9/11 Attacks

Does Saudi Arabia Own
Donald Trump
 
 
 

Donald Trump Interview on FOX AND FRIENDS 2/17/16

 

"EITHER YOU ARE WITH US, OR WITH THE TERRORISTS"
- George W. Bush, 9/21/2001 - 



 

smedley butler war is a racket

UNDERSTAND THE BIG PICTURE HERE: General Summary/Crash Course

 

 

 




 

BEYOND TREASON

Documentary Synopsis:

Department of Defense documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act expose the horrific underworld of the disposable army mentality and the government funded experimentation upon US citizens conducted without their knowledge or consent. The history of U.S. government use of Depleted Uranium munitions in Iraq and its effects on the Iraqi people and our troops.

UNMASKING SECRET MILITARY PROJECTS:
Chemical & Biological Exposures
Radioactive Poisoning
Mind Control Projects
Experimental Vaccines
Gulf War Illness
Depleted Uranium (DU)

 

 

Why We Fight is a 2005 documentary film about the military–industrial complex directed by Eugene Jarecki. The title refers to the World War II-era eponymous propaganda movies commissioned by the U.S. Government to justify their decision to enter the war against the Axis Powers.

Why We Fight was first screened at the 2005 Sundance Film Festival on January 17, 2005, exactly forty-four years after President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s farewell address. Although it won the Grand Jury Prize for Documentary, it received a limited public cinema release on January 22, 2006, and then was released on DVD on June 27, 2006, by Sony Pictures Home Entertainment. The documentary also won one of the 2006 Grimme Awards in the competition “Information & Culture”; the prize is one of Germany’s most prestigious for television productions and a Peabody Award in 2006.

Synopsis:

Why We Fight describes the rise and maintenance of the United States military–industrial complex and its 50-year involvement with the wars led by the United States to date, especially its 2003 invasion of Iraq. The documentary asserts that in every decade since World War II, the American public was misled so that the government (incumbent Administration) could take them to war and fuel the military-industrial economy maintaining American political dominance in the world. Interviewed about this matter are politician John McCain, political scientist and former CIA analyst Chalmers Johnson, politician Richard Perle, neoconservative commentator William Kristol, writer Gore Vidal, and public policy expert Joseph Cirincione.

Why We Fight documents the consequences of said foreign policy with the stories of a Vietnam War veteran whose son was killed in the September 11, 2001 attacks, and who then asked the military to write the name of his dead son on any bomb to be dropped in Iraq; a 23-year-old New Yorker who enlists in the United States Army because he was poor and in debt, his decision impelled by his mother’s death; and a military explosives scientist (Anh Duong) who arrived in the U.S. as a refugee child from Vietnam in 1975.

 

 

 



September 10, 2016 | Part Of RON PAUL INSITUTE FOREIGN POLICY
Foreign Policy and Libertarian Principles, Part 2

Libertarian policy scholars and bloggers talked about various aspects of their push for less government. They discussed fiscal policy, conscientious objection to compulsory military service, and the financing of the September 11, 2001, terror attacks.

SPEAKERS:

Paul-Martin Foss
Founder, President and Executive Director Carl Menger Center for the Study of Money and Banking

Brian McGlinchey is a Founder for the 28Pages.org with one video in the C-SPAN Video Library; the first appearance was a 2016 Forum.

On the C-SPAN Networks:
Jessica Pavoni was a Pilot Instructor for the U.S. Air Force with one video in the C-SPAN Video Library; the first appearance was a 2016 Forum.

On the C-SPAN Networks:
John Sharpe is a Founder and Managing Director for the IHS Press with one video in the C-SPAN Video Library; the first appearance was a 2016 Forum.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
A recent poll asked Americans if they felt America actually was an empire. Forty percent said "No." Lawrence Vance alleges the U.S. is the largest empire in the history of the world, dwarfing the British, Ottoman, and Roman empires in size and scope. Prof. Jerry Kroth looks at the delusion and denial rampant within the American population on this issue, examining our 55 military interventions since World War II, our long and close relationship with dictators, juntas, and monarchs in building our empire, our military presence in over 130 countries of the world (70% of the planet) and what life might look like if we actually dismantled it. This lecture is based on Dr. Kroth's book Implosion: delusion, denial, and the prospect of collapse. - Jerry Kroth, Oct 16, 2012
 
 

 

 

The Corbett Report Official LBRY Channel


TRANSCRIPT AND DOWNLOAD: https://www.corbettreport.com/wwi/

What was World War One about? How did it start? Who won? And what did they win? Now, 100 years after those final shots rang out, these questions still puzzle historians and laymen alike. But as we shall see, this confusion is not a happenstance of history but the wool that has been pulled over our eyes to stop us from seeing what WWI really was.

This is the story of WWI that you didn’t read in the history books. This is The WWI Conspiracy.

 

 




 

 

 


Bruce Fein on the American Empire
- 8/22/18 -


by Scott - Aug 26, 2018 - Interviews

Bruce Fein joins Scott to talk about U.S. complicity in war crimes by supporting brutal regimes oversees. He points out that according to international law, if the United States supports a country that’s at war, it becomes a co-belligerent and can legitimately be attacked, just like the original country. Unfortunately, despite some rhetoric to the contrary, President Trump seems just as willing as his predecessors to engage in unconstitutional wars and executive overreach.

Discussed on the show:

Bruce Fein is an attorney and former associate deputy attorney general and general counsel for the FCC. He writes regularly for The American Conservative, and you can follow him on Twitter @BruceFeinEsq.

This episode of the Scott Horton Show is sponsored by: Kesslyn Runs, by Charles Featherstone; NoDev NoOps NoIT, by Hussein Badakhchani; The War State, by Mike Swanson; WallStreetWindow.com; Roberts and Roberts Brokerage Inc.; Zen Cash; Tom Woods’ Liberty Classroom; ExpandDesigns.com/Scott; and TheBumperSticker.com.

 

N A T I O N A L D E B T ! ! ! ! ! !

Visit USADebtClock.com to learn more!

Bruce Fein on the American Empire and How It Increases Executive Power June 27, 2018

Scott Horton
Published on Jul 4, 2018

Bruce Fein is interviewed on his new article for The American Conservative Magazine, “American Empire Demands a Caesar“. The evolution of the Republic to the Empire is discussed, and where and when the Republic went wrong is debated.

Check out Scott’s Patreon page.



Links: The Constitution , Bill of Rights , Your Rights , Full Spectrum Dominance , Assassination Program , NDAA , Economy Destroyed By Design! 

Empire In Crisis & Bruce Fein

RT America
Published on May 25, 2018

Jesse Ventura and Brigida Santos discuss the fate of the global international order and why some experts predict American hegemony will end by 2030. Constitutional scholar and author Bruce Fein shares insight from his book, “American Empire Before the Fall.”

Bruce Fein on the American Empire
August 22, 2018


Scott Horton
Published on Sep 23, 2018

Bruce Fein joins Scott to talk about U.S. complicity in war crimes by supporting brutal regimes oversees. He points out that according to international law, if the United States supports a country that’s at war, it becomes a co-belligerent and can legitimately be attacked, just like the original country. Unfortunately, despite some rhetoric to the contrary, President Trump seems just as willing as his predecessors to engage in unconstitutional wars and executive overreach.

Bruce Fein is an attorney and former associate deputy attorney general and general counsel for the FCC. He writes regularly for The American Conservative, and you can follow him on Twitter @BruceFeinEsq.

US Army Asked Twitter How Military Service Has Impacted People
- The Responses Will Break Your Heart -

The Last American Vagabond
Published on May 27, 2019
This is an excerpt of The Daily Wrap Up 5/26.

Full Episode Can Be Seen Here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1f4y...


The US Army Asked Twitter How Service Has Impacted People. The Answers Were Gut-Wrenching. https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/th... https://twitter.com/USArmy/status/113...

 

 

 


 


 

An Open Letter to the Troops: You’re Not Defending Our Freedoms

by Jacob G. Hornberger
https://www.fff.org/author/jacob-hornberger-2/
May 31, 2011

Dear Troops:


Yesterday — Memorial Day — some people asserted, once again, that you are “defending our freedoms” overseas.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Those people are just repeating tired old mantras. The reality is that you are not defending our freedoms with your actions overseas. In fact, it is the exact opposite. Your actions overseas are placing our freedoms here at home in ever-greater jeopardy.

Consider your occupation of Iraq, a country that, as you know, never attacked the United States, making it the defender in the war and the United States the aggressor. Think about that: Every single person that the troops have killed, maimed, or tortured in Iraq had absolutely nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks.

Yet, the countless victims of the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq have friends and relatives, many of whom have become filled with anger and rage and who now would stop at nothing to retaliate with terrorist attacks against Americans.

Pray tell: How does that constitute defending our freedoms?

It was no different prior to 9/11. At the end of the Persian Gulf War, the troops intentionally destroyed Iraq’s water and sewage facilities after a Pentagon study showed that this would help spread infectious illnesses among the Iraqi people.

It worked. For 11 years after that, the troops enforced the cruel and brutal sanctions on Iraq that killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children. (See “America’s Peacetime Crimes against Iraq” by Anthony Gregory.) You’ll recall U.S. Ambassador to the UN Madeleine Albright’s infamous statement that the deaths of half-a-million Iraqi children from the sanctions were “worth it.”

By “it” she meant the attempted ouster of Saddam Hussein from power. You will recall that he was a dictator who was the U.S. government’s ally and partner during the 1980s, when the United States was furnishing him with those infamous WMDs that U.S. officials later used to excite the American people into supporting your invasion of Iraq.

The truth is that 9/11 furnished U.S. officials with the excuse to do what their sanctions (and the deaths of all those Iraqi children) had failed to accomplish: ridding Iraq of Saddam Hussein and replacing him with a U.S-approved regime.

That’s what your post-9/11 invasion of Iraq was all about — to achieve the regime change that the pre-9/11 deadly sanctions that killed all those children had failed to achieve.

No, not mushroom clouds, not freedom, not democracy, and certainly not defending our freedoms here at home. Just plain old regime change.

In the process, all that you — the troops — have done with your invasion and occupation of Iraq is produce even more enmity toward the United States by people in the Middle East, especially those Iraqis who have lost loved ones or friends in the process or simply watched their country be destroyed.

In principle, it’s no different with Afghanistan. I’d estimate that 99 percent of the people the troops have killed, maimed, or tortured in that country had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11.

Why did you invade Afghanistan or, more precisely, why did President Bush order you to do so?

No, not because the Taliban participated in the 9/11 attacks and, no, not because the Taliban were even aware that the attacks were going to take place

President Bush ordered the troops to invade Afghanistan — and, of course, kill Afghan citizens in the process — because the Afghan government – the Taliban — refused to comply with his unconditional extradition demand. You will recall that the Taliban offered to turn bin Laden over to an independent tribunal to stand trial upon the receipt of evidence from the United States indicating his complicity in the 9/11 attacks.

Bush responded to the Taliban’s offer by issuing his order to the troops to invade Afghanistan, kill Afghans, and occupy the country. In the process, U.S. officials installed one of the most crooked, corrupt, and dictatorial rulers it could find to govern the country, one who is so incompetent he cannot even hide the manifest fraud by which he has supposedly been elected to office.

In the process of installing and defending the Karzai regime, the troops have killed brides, grooms, children, fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, uncles, aunts, cousins, friends, and countrymen, most of whom never attacked the United States on 9/11 or at any other time. They simply became “collateral damage” or “bad guys” for having the audacity to oppose the invasion and occupation of their country by a foreign regime. (It should be noted for the record that U.S. officials considered these types of “bad guys,” as well as Osama bin Laden and other fundamentalist Muslims, to be “good guys” when they were trying to oust Soviet troops from Afghanistan.)

Was there another way to bring bin Laden to justice? Yes, the criminal-justice route, which was the route used after the 1993 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center.

That’s right. Same target, different date. In fact, the accused terrorists — Ramzi Yousef in 1993 and Osama bin Laden in 2001 — were ultimately located in the same country, Pakistan.

In Yousef’s case, he was arrested some three years after the attack, brought back to the United States, prosecuted, and convicted in federal district court. He’s now serving a life sentence in a federal penitentiary.

No invasions, no bombings, no occupations, no killing of countless innocent people, no torture, no war on terrorism, and no anger and rage that such actions inevitably would have produced among the victims, their families, and friends.

In bin Laden’s case, we instead got a military invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, where the troops have killed, maimed, tortured, and hurt countless people who had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks.

How in the world have your invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq defended our freedoms here at home? Indeed, how have the assassinations and bombings in Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, and who knows where else defended our freedoms?

All these things have accomplished is keeping foreigners angry at us, thereby subjecting us to the constant and ever-growing threat of terrorist retaliation here at home. As I have pointed out before, the U.S. military — that is, you, the troops — have become the biggest terrorist-producing machine in history. Every time you kill some Iraqi or Afghan citizen, even when accidental, ten more offer to take his place out of anger and rage.

That’s the same thing that was happening prior to 9/11. In fact, there were some, including those of us here at The Future of Freedom Foundation, who were warning prior to 9/11 that unless the U.S. Empire stopped what it was doing to people in the Middle East (including the deadly sanctions on Iraq, the support of Middle East dictators, the stationing of U.S. troops near Islamic holy lands, and the unconditional money and armaments to the Israeli regime), Americans would be increasingly subject to terrorist attacks. On 9/11, we were proven right, unfortunately. (See Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire by Chalmers Johnson.)

How does the constant threat of terrorist retaliation arising from your actions in Iraq and Afghanistan make us freer here at home, especially when you — the troops — are responsible for engendering the anger and rage that culminates in such threats, owing to what you are doing to people over there?

Consider also what the U.S. government does to our freedoms here at home as a direct consequence of the terrorist threat that you, the troops, are producing over there. It uses that threat of terrorism to infringe upon our freedoms here at home! You know what I mean — the fondling at the airports, the 10-year-old Patriot Act, the illegal spying on Americans, the indefinite detention, the torture, the kangaroo tribunals, Gitmo, and the entire war on terrorism — all necessary, they tell us, to keep us safe from the terrorists — that is, the people you all are producing with your actions over there.

In other words, if you all weren’t producing an endless stream of terrorists with your invasions, occupations, torture, assassinations, bombings, and Gitmo, the U.S. government — the entity you are working for — would no longer have that excuse for taking away our freedoms.

This past Sunday, the Washington Post carried an article about American wives who were recently greeting their husbands on their return from Afghanistan. Newlywed Anne Krolicki, 24, commented to her husband on the death of one of her friends’ husband: “It’s a pointless war,” she said.

That lady has her head on straight. She’s has a grip on reality, doesn’t deal in tired old mantras, and speaks the truth. Every U.S. soldier who dies in Iraq and Afghanistan dies for nothing, which was the same thing that some 58,000 men of my generation died for in Vietnam.

Please don’t write me to tell me that you all are good people or that you’re “patriots” for simply following whatever orders you are given. All that is irrelevant. What matters is what you are doing over there. And what you are doing is not defending our freedoms, you are jeopardizing them.

 

 





American Soldiers Did Not Die Defending Our Freedom

by Jacob G. Hornberger
May 27, 2014
https://www.fff.org/2014/05/27/american-soldiers-did-not-die-defending-our-freedom/

 

I was at the Washington Nationals baseball game yesterday. Whenever I attend a Nats game, there is an air of militarism surrounding the game, but attending on Memorial Day helps to remind us what a truly militarized society America has become.

After all, what in the world does baseball, a quite peaceful and enjoyable pastime, have to do with America’s countless foreign wars, which have killed, tortured, and maimed millions of people?

One of the most fascinating aspects to U.S. militarism is the bromide that has infected the minds of so many Americans: that U.S. soldiers have sacrificed their lives or limbs in foreign wars to “defend our freedom” here at home. Not surprisingly, it was repeated at the Nationals game yesterday. People who came to watch a baseball game were asked to remember the sacrifices, including deaths, that American servicemen have made in the “defense of our freedom.”

Why do I find that fascinating?

Two reasons: first, The bromide is palpably false, and, second, it is a testament to the power of state to indoctrinate the citizenry.

This is a bromide that is inculcated into every child, from the time he reaches six years of age and heads into the public (i.e., government) school system. By the time the kid reaches his teen years, the indoctrination is taking hold. By the time he becomes an adult, the indoctrination is complete. In fact, the indoctrination is so perfect that actually it doesn’t matter what the troops are doing overseas. Whatever they are doing is automatically considered to be “defending our freedom.”

Consider a hypothetical. Suppose there is some country thousands of miles away that is minding its own business. There are no attacks on the United States or even threats to attack the United States. The only problem is that the regime is not sufficiently submissive to the U.S. government.

The U.S. government decides to invade the country and install a pro-U.S. regime. The troops are sent into battle. Some are killed. Countless more people are killed on the other side.

There is no doubt that millions of Americans will automatically conclude that those U.S. troops killed and died “defending our freedom,” notwithstanding the fact that our freedom was never at risk. Remember: that hypothetical country never attacked the United States or even threatened to do so. Yet, many Americans will nonetheless honor their brave and courageous soldiers who died or lost arms or legs while “defending our freedom.” It is how the indoctrinated mind works.

How can I be so certain that that’s the way many Americans would react to that hypothetical situation?

Because that’s what happened with Iraq, a country whose government never attacked the United States or even threatened to do so. Thus, not one single U.S. soldier died in Iraq “defending our freedom” because our freedom was never threatened by Iraq.

The same holds true for the 58,000 plus American soldiers who died in the Vietnam War. North Vietnam was engaged in a civil war against South Vietnam. At no time did North Vietnam attack or invade the United States. It had no interest in doing so and, anyway, it lacked the military capability to do so. The U.S. government invaded Vietnam and embroiled itself in its civil war. At no time were the freedoms of the American people threatened by the North Vietnamese. The American troops who were sent to the deaths in Vietnam did not die in the defense of our freedom here at home.

The same is true for the tens of thousands of American men who were sent to their deaths in the Korean War. North Korea never attacked or invaded the United States or even threatened to do so. American freedom here at home was never threatened. Thus, those U.S. soldiers in Korea did not die defending our freedom.

What about the soldiers who died in the U.S. invasion of Panama or Grenada? Again, Panama and Granada never attacked the United States or even threatened to do so. Those troops did not die in the defense of our freedom.

World War I? At no time did Germany or Austria-Hungary attack the United States or even threaten to do so. The Great War was a war between empires, one that never endangered the freedom of the American people. The U.S. government simply chose to intervene in that conflict in the hopes of “making the world safe for democracy” and to “end all wars.” Those U.S. soldiers who died in World War I did not die defending our freedom.

What about the so-called “good war”—World War II. While Japan attacked U.S. forces at Pearl Harbor and the Philippines, the attack was a direct consequence of President Roosevelt’s repeated attempts to induce Japan to attack the United States to fulfill his wish to get the United States into the war. FDR had imposed an oil embargo on Japan, frozen Japanese bank accounts in the United States, and imposed humiliating terms in pre-war negotiations with Japan, all with the aim of getting Japan to “fire the first shot” so that the United States could get into the war. Japan never had the aim or the military means of invading and occupying the United States and depriving the American people of their freedom.

What about Nazi Germany? It desired to avoid war with the United States, which is why FDR used Japan as a “back door” to war. The only reason Germany declared war on the United States after Pearl Harbor was to fulfill its treaty obligations to Japan. Before England declared war on Germany, it was clear that Hitler was moving east toward the Soviet Union, not west toward the United States. Moreover, since Germany lacked the military means to cross the English Channel and invade England, how in the world would it cross the Atlantic Ocean and invade the United States?

Moreover, consider the aftermath of World War II: East Germany and Eastern Europe and China all under communist control. Isn’t that what American soldiers actually died for—so that the communists, rather than the Nazis or Japanese, could control those parts of the world? Even if one finds that a worthy thing to die for, it’s a far cry from dying in the defense of our freedom here at home.

Oh, I almost forgot Afghanistan. No, al-Qaeda was never going to invade and occupy the United States and take away our freedom. Neither was the Taliban. The 9/11 attacks were retaliation for actions taken by the U.S. government in the Middle East prior to 9/11. The Taliban government never attacked the United States or even threatened to do so.

The truth, as discomforting as it is, is that the many U.S soldiers who have been sacrificed in America’s countless foreign wars did not die defending our freedom. That’s nothing more than a false bromide used to justify America’s never-ending foreign wars.

When enough people break through the indoctrination, as libertarians have, the bromide will no longer have the power it does over people’s minds. At that point, maybe Americans will be free to enjoy baseball games and other sporting events without all the militarism attached to them.

 


The Troops Did Not Die for Our Country or Our Freedom
https://www.fff.org/2016/05/31/troops-not-die-country-freedom/ 


by
 May 31, 2016

Yesterday, I received an email from an independent candidate for U.S. Senate in Alaska, Margaret Stock, which pointed out that she is a retired Lt. Colonel in the U.S. Army Reserve and a former professor at West Point. In her email, Stock stated that she had served alongside and mentored soldiers “who have given their lives for our country.”

It would be difficult for me to find anything more nonsensical than that. Does she really mean what she says? Or is it just political pabulum?

Show me U.S. one soldier — just one — in the past 65 years who has died for his country or, as others assert, in the defense of our freedoms here at home. You can’t do it.

Most of those soldiers died because officials within the national-security branch of the federal government ordered to go to some foreign country thousands of miles away, where they were placed in a position of kill or be killed. In fact, many of them were first conscripted (i.e., seized) and then ordered to deploy.

Some soldiers volunteered to go and fight in order to improve their chances for promotion. During the Vietnam War I knew of an Air Force colonel who volunteered to go to Vietnam because he was convinced that that was the only way he could make general. I also knew of several officers who were trying to get to Vietnam in the waning stages of the war to pad their combat resumes.

One thing is for certain: Contrary to what Stock asserts, the deployment of U.S. troops in wars for the past 65 years have had nothing to do with defending America or the freedom of the American people for one simple reason: America and American freedom were never under attack.

Suppose that U.S. troops had not gotten involved in the Korean War in the early 1950s. Ask yourself: How many Americans would have voluntarily traveled to Korea and helped the South Koreans defeat the North Korean communists?

Answer: Zero! None! Not one single American would have done that, even if President Truman and his national-security establishment had pointed out the dangers that international communism posed to America.

Suppose the U.S. national-security establishment had never invaded Vietnam and simply decided to stay out of that country’s civil war. Suppose President Johnson, the Pentagon, and the CIA told Americans that a victory by North Vietnam would pose a grave threat to U.S. national security because the dominoes would begin falling to the communists, with the big domino (the United States) ultimately falling to the Reds.

How many Americans would have traveled to South Vietnam and joined up with South Vietnamese forces to help them prevent a communist victory?

Answer: Zero! None! Not one single American would have gone to fight the commies in Vietnam.

Suppose George H.W. Bush had refused to involve his army in his war against Iraq in 1991, but had exhorted Americans to travel to the Middle East and join up with forces that were attempting to reverse Iraq’s (i.e., Saddam Hussein’s) invasion of Kuwait. Suppose that Bush had told Americans that while the U.S. government had partnered with Saddam during the 1980s in his war on Iran, Saddam had since become a “new Hitler” who threatened the world.

How many Americans would have traveled to the Middle East to join up with forces attempting to liberate Kuwait from Saddam?

Answer: None! Zip!

Suppose George W. Bush had declined to invade Afghanistan and Iraq after the 9/11 attacks but instead simply put out an arrest warrant and bounty for Osama bin Laden.

How many Americans would have traveled to Afghanistan and Iraq to oust the Taliban and Saddam Hussein from power?

Answer: None. The only ones who would have gone over there would have been the ones looking for bin Laden in the hopes of collecting a large bounty.

If the U.S. government evacuated the Middle East and Afghanistan today, how many Americans would travel to Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Syria or the rest of the Middle East to fight ISIS and prevent it from taking over those countries?

Answer: Not one single one, including the infamous neocons who continue to tell us that “national security” is at stake. In fact, if all U.S. troops were ordered to withdraw from that part of the world today, not one single U.S. soldier, including officers and enlisted men, would seek to resign from the U.S. military and travel to Iraq and Afghanistan to prevent ISIS and the Taliban from winning and taking control in that part of the world.

So, does all that mean that the American people are cowards? That they are only courageous when it comes to sending the troops to do the fighting for them? That they’re not willing to put their lives on the line in the defense of their country? That they’re not willing to defend their own freedom and the freedom and security of their family members and countrymen?

No, it doesn’t mean any of those things. It simply means that the American people are not stupid. The reason they wouldn’t have traveled to South Korea or South Vietnam and helped them to defeat the communists is simply because giving their lives in a civil war thousands of miles away wasn’t worth it to them. If someone had told them that a communist victory in Korea or Vietnam could mean that the Reds would ultimately take over the federal government and run the IRS, they would have summarily rejected that notion as ridiculous.

The same holds true for the Middle East and Afghanistan today. Deep down, every American knows that it’s not going to make one whit of difference, insofar as the United States is concerned, if ISIS wins or if the Taliban wins. If they really believed that America’s existence and freedom were at stake, you’d see Americans traveling over there and volunteering to help the Iraqi and Afghan armies.

Oh, for sure, most (but certainly not all) Americans would have sympathized with the South Koreans and the South Vietnamese but they never would have gone over there to commit their lives fighting a communist unification of both countries.

Now, imagine that the United States were suddenly invaded by the troops of some foreign nation-state. How many Americans would come to the defense of their country, their families, and their freedom?

Answer: 98 percent.

Everything changes, however, when it comes to the U.S. national-security establishment, the totalitarian apparatus that came into existence with the Cold War. When the national-security establishment says that it’s imperative that U.S. military forces defeat North Korea or North Vietnam or Saddam Hussein or the Taliban or Iran or whoever, everyone hops to, clicks his heels, salutes, and automatically accepts it as gospel. People have converted the Pentagon, the CIA, and the NSA into their god — their idol — and heaven help anyone who dares to criticize what their warrior angels — the troops — do with respect to all those foreign interventions.

Suddenly, everyone’s mindset changes. “The troops in Korea are dying for our freedom!” “The troops are dying in Vietnam for their country.” “The troops are dying in Afghanistan and Iraq for their country and our freedom.”

It’s all a crock. They’re dying because the national-security state deemed it necessary to involve the United States in overseas conflicts whose participants never invaded the United States or threatened our nation or our freedom in any way.

It’s been a racket since the day the national-security establishment was grafted onto our original governmental system. It’s the national-security state that has gotten America into all these unnecessary wars and conflicts. And they’re not stopping. They’re now provoking two other major nuclear powers, Russia and China. If anyone thinks that nuclear war isn’t possible, he is naïve to the extreme.

Yesterday, the New York Times reported that suicides among soldiers who have experienced repeated deployments to the Middle East and Afghanistan are suffering record suicide rates. We all know about the family violence, the alcoholism, the drug addiction, and the depression that U.S. troops who have fought in that part of the world are experiencing.

And of course there are the dead — the soldiers who, we are told, made the ultimate sacrifice for our country and our freedom. It’s all one great big lie, one that people feel is necessary to keep intact at all costs, just like everyone was expected to admire the emperor’s new clothes. The naked truth is that U.S. soldiers who died in all those overseas military adventures died for nothing — that is, they died for something that no American would have been willing to die for if the U.S. national-security establishment had not gotten America embroiled in those (illegal and unconstitutional) wars.

As our ancestors understood so well, there will always be monsters in the world in the form of such things as tyrannical dictatorships, civil wars, and famines. (See John Quincy Adams’ July 4, 1821, address to Congress entitled “In Search of Monsters to Destroy.”) America, Adams said, would not send soldiers abroad to slay any of those dragons but instead would serve as a sanctuary for people fleeing those monsters. He also pointed out that if America ever abandoned this non-interventionist philosophy, it would inevitably change America in drastic ways, for the worse. Who can argue that he was wrong?

The Cold War national-security state apparatus overturned that non-interventionist philosophy, committing America to a perpetual crusade to slay monsters overseas. That’s what every U.S. soldier has died for and sacrificed for during the past 65 years — not for freedom, not for our country but instead for such things as regime-change operations, coups, partnerships with dictators, and other vital interests of the national-security establishment, all with the aim of keeping that old Cold War dinosaur, the national security state, in perpetual existence.

The sooner Americans, including the troops, acknowledge this truth, as discomforting as it might be, the better off America and the troops will be, because then we can restore a constitutional republic to our land and make America, once again, a peaceful, harmonious, prosperous, and free country.

See my newest ebook: The CIA, Terrorism, and the Cold War: The Evil of the National Security State.

Jacob G. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation. He was born and raised in Laredo, Texas, and received his B.A. in economics from Virginia Military Institute and his law degree from the University of Texas. He was a trial attorney for twelve years in Texas. He also was an adjunct professor at the University of Dallas, where he taught law and economics. In 1987, Mr. Hornberger left the practice of law to become director of programs at the Foundation for Economic Education. He has advanced freedom and free markets on talk-radio stations all across the country as well as on Fox News’ Neil Cavuto and Greta van Susteren shows and he appeared as a regular commentator on Judge Andrew Napolitano’s show Freedom Watch. View these interviews at LewRockwell.com and from Full Context. Send him email.

 

 


 

 

 

Vietnam Veterans Marching For Peace

VVAW Dewey Canyon III
Veterans Against the War



Mark Santow | Nov 11, 2013

http://www.vvaw.org/veteran/article/?id=1656

In April of 1971 the war was raging in Indochina. The vast majority of American were sick and tired of it and wanted the war to end. Thousands and thousands were actively demonstrating their opposition to the war as the US government was losing more and more support for its Vietnam policies. 

Cont. Below

About Face:
Veterans Against the War

The Peace Report | Dec 11, 2018

Support About Face now:
https://bit.ly/2C1nDSY

About Face Website:
https://aboutfaceveterans.org/

This channel works for donations:
Patreon: http://bit.ly/2C13ysE
Paypal: http://bit.ly/2nHDvTi

Winter Soldier:
Iraq and Afghanistan

Imaginari Pacem | April, 2012

http://www.ivaw.org

http://www.ivaw.org/mojostore/mojosto...

Eyewitness Accounts of the Occupations

"...In spring 2008, inspired by the Vietnam-era Winter Soldier hearings, Iraq Veterans Against the War gathered outside Washington, DC and testified to atrocities they witnessed while deployed in the occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq. This video captures the powerful words and images of this historic event.  Cont. Below

 

VVAW Dewey Canyon III

... Soldiers in Vietnam were refusing to go on combat missions. At home, veterans formed a national organization, Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW). It was in April of 1971 that VVAW held its first national demonstration to protest the war in Vietnam. The demonstration was named "Operation Dewey Canyon III" (Dewey Canyon I and II were secret operations into Laos that were never reported to the American people). It was held in Washington DC from April 18th to April 23rd, and was the most powerful antiwar demonstration held up to that time; it sparked off a series of major demonstrations that made it clear that the American people wanted the US out of Indochina.

A BRIEF BACKGROUND

VVAW had been formed in 1967, but it wasn't until 1970 that the organization realized its potential and began to see the importance of building nationally. In late January of 1971 an investigation into war crimes, with 150 vets testifying from firsthand experience, was held in Detroit. At this 3-day investigation the real basis was laid for organizing VVAW nationally. In mid February a meeting was held in New York bringing together vets from all over the country. There, VVAW became a national organization and the idea of DC III was crystallized. Vets went back to their cities and began to build for the Washington demonstration.

 

Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan Eyewitness Accounts of the Occupations

... Well-publicized cases of American brutality like the Abu Ghraib prison scandal and the massacre of an entire Iraqi family in the city of Haditha are not isolated incidents. Instead, they are the logical consequences of U.S. war policy.

Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan preserves and honors the participants' courageous contributions in or to ensure that people arounf the world remember their stories and struggle. The 1 hour edited video features 13 veterans from three days of testimony given by over 70 men and women who served in Iraq and Afghanistan. The footage addresses such issues as the U.S. military's callous disregard for civilian life, the torture of detainees, the culture of racism that's inherent in a military occupation, gender discriminations, and the health crisis facing today's veterans..."

See also http://www.ivawarchive.org/wintersoldier

About Face Website: https://aboutfaceveterans.org/

 

 SIR! NO SIR! 

In the 1960’s an anti-war movement emerged that altered the course of history. This movement didn’t take place on college campuses, but in barracks and on aircraft carriers. It flourished in army stockades, navy brigs and in the dingy towns that surround military bases. It penetrated elite military colleges like West Point. And it spread throughout the battlefields of Vietnam. It was a movement no one expected, least of all those in it.  Hundreds went to prison and thousands into exile.  And by 1971 it had, in the words of one colonel, infested the entire armed services. Yet today few people know about the GI movement against the war in Vietnam.

http://www.sirnosir.com/the_film/synopsis.html

WE WHO DARE SAY NO TO WAR!

 

Soldiers Refusing To Fight For Alqaeda

LINKS:
[ AL-QAEDA EXPOSED!! ] | SYRIA | YEMEN | RAND Corporation | Troops Protect Government Drug Dealing |

Pawns On The Chessboard | War Empire and the Military

 

 

Troops Are Pawns On The Grand Chessboard 

"Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy."

- Henry Kissinger -

 

 

 

“If soldiers were to begin to think, not one of them would remain in the army.” 
- Frederick the Great -Soldier Getting Brain Replaced With Helmet
Cursed Be Unconditional Obedience

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2011/08/laurence-m-vance/cursed-be-unconditional-obedience/

 

 

 

 

Books Used In Crash Course Summary

 

Books Used In The Summary: Tragedy and Hope, The Anglo-American Establishment, War Is A Racket, 1984, Brave New World, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy, Lord Milner’s Second War, Globalization and the Crucible of Global Banking, Prolonging The Agony, Propaganda, Technocracy Rising, The Sorrows of Empire, Manifest Destiny, Trilaterals Over Washington, Hidden History - The Secret Origins of The First World War, Wall Street and FDR, Between Two Ages, Transhumanism, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Trilaterals Over America, The Prince, Western Technology - Soviet Economic Development, America’s Secret Establishment, National Suicide - Military Aid To The Soviet Union, The United Nations’ Global Straitjacket, When Central Banks Rule The World, Technocracy - The Hard Road to World Order, Wall Street And The Rise of Hitler, Tragedy and Hope 101.

LINK: General Summary/Crash Course

 

 

 

 

<< Previous    [1]  2  3    Next >>

 

look into it videos


 

 

 

 







  

 

invisible empire

 

 

hollerith dvd

 

 

obama deception

  

Aaron Russo 

 

Terror Storm final cut 

 

  

police state 4

    

blueprint of madmen

 

endgame

 

documentaries