The Military is out directing traffic during public events, armed drones are set to fly
over America with direction to track and trace law abiding gun owning citizens. The globalist police state grid
has been slowly tighten its grip around the American public for decades. Now, as the control grid reaches its
final stages and with the Bill of Rights almost completely destroyed, the globalists are playing the same card
that mass murdering tyrants have always played: disarming the public.
Okay, we all know how awful Hillary Clinton is. We all know that Donald Trump said all the right
things (well, many of the right things) on the campaign trail. We all know—at least believed—that Trump was not an
establishment insider. We all know that Trump promised to “drain the swamp,” dramatically reduce America’s
out-of-control deficit spending, protect the Second Amendment, get America out of its endless foreign wars,
terminate taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood, overturn Roe v Wade and build a wall on our southern border—that
Mexico would pay for—in order to stop the flow of illegal immigration into America.
Now, after two full years of a
Donald Trump administration in which he enjoyed both houses of Congress being held by fellow Republicans, we all
know (and if we don’t, it’s because we don’t WANT to know) that none of the above has happened. Yet, Christians and
conservatives by the millions continue to make excuses for this faker.
First, a brief comment about the
border wall: All of the drama regarding a partial government shutdown and incessant public theater by actors from
both political parties is quite nauseating. Republicans had control of both houses of Congress and the White House
for two years. Why wasn’t money appropriated for the wall then? Why was there no government shutdown over the lack
of funding for the border wall then? Why wait until Democrats take over the House to shut down (partially) the
federal government and threaten to declare a State of National Emergency?
Forgive me, but this stinks to high
heaven. This is nothing but smoke and mirrors. All of the high profile theatrics over the border wall is the
biggest distraction to envelop our country in quite a spell. While everyone is fighting over the wall, some very
serious attacks against our liberties are being waged almost without notice. And all of the hullabaloo over the
wall is completely covering up Trump’s failure to carry out the rest of his campaign promises—and the fact that
Trump himself has often worked in direct opposition to many of his campaign promises.
Secondly, his rhetoric
notwithstanding, President Trump has NOT drawn down America’s involvement in endless foreign wars. Trump’s promise
to bring U.S. forces home from Syria is so much hot air. Trump’s “immediate” withdrawal order is now mired in an
indefinite time schedule. In other words, there is no time schedule. Our troops that are still fighting in Syria
are not only still based in Syria, but they are also still using bases in Iraq as launching pads for military
excursions into Syria. Of course, Trump promised that the U.S. bases in Iraq were not going anywhere—and that’s one
promise he will keep.
Our troops are still fighting
endless wars in Afghanistan andSomalia. In fact, Trump has shoved record military spending through Congress and has done
nothing to reduce America’s global military presence (U.S. troops are stationed in over 160 countries, which equates to 95% of the world’s foreign military bases). America is
as much the global cop as it was when Trump was elected. No, that’s not quite true: We are MUCH MORE the global
cop than when Trump was elected, as Trump has expanded our military presence in Eastern Europe to unprecedented
levels—levels not even seen during the Cold War.
Thirdly, as we have just passed the
46th anniversary of the ignoble Roe v Wade Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion-on-demand nationwide,
unborn children continue to be legally murdered—in spite of the fact that Donald Trump was President and
Republicans controlled both houses of Congress during the past two years. All of Trump’s “pro-life” rhetoric hasn’t
saved the life of a single unborn baby. Since Trump was elected, over 2 million unborn children have been
mercilessly murdered in the wombs of their mothers—with the complete approbation of a Republican-led federal
government.
The GOP controlled the entire
federal government for 4.6 years of G.W. Bush's eight years in office—and they controlled the entire federal
government for the past two years of Donald Trump’s presidency. They did NOTHING about Roe v Wade under Bush, and
they have done NOTHING about Roe v Wade under Trump. These phony pro-life GOP congressmen and senators haven't even
defunded America's largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood.
Fifthly, what about Trump’s promise
to “drain the swamp”? This is one of Trump’s biggest lies of all. Trump never intended to drain the swamp. From the
outset of his presidency, he began appointing mostly CFR globalists, neocons, warmongers, Zionists, corporate
elitists and corrupt government insiders to his administration. And he hasn’t stopped.
I am absolutely sick and tired of
hearing my conservative Christian brethren say things like, “Trump is trying his best, but he’s getting no help
from his cabinet and staff.” Well, DUH! Who picked his cabinet and staff? Trump did.
Then they say things like, “Trump doesn’t really understand these issues; he
really wants to do right, but he’s getting bad advice.” BARF! If he didn’t understand the issues, he’s had two
full years as President of the United States to get caught up. But he continues to make the same
unconstitutional, big-government, warmongering decisions over and over again. The excuse that “he wants to do
right, but is getting bad advice” just doesn’t wash anymore. It’s time for Trump’s supporters to wake up and
realize that Donald Trump is a great big boy, not a little kid, and is fully capable of thinking for
himself.
Donald Trump knows exactly what
he’s doing. He’s known exactly what he’s been doing from day number one. He is the consummate con man. He is a
charlatan. He is a double-tongued pretender. He has filled the executive branch of the federal government with the
same crooks as presidents before him.
And now Trump’s selection of
William Barr as America’s next attorney general is the final straw. There can be NO MORE DOUBT.
William Barr is the swamp
creature’s Swamp Creature. He is the personification of all of the evil and wickedness that has gone on in
Washington, D.C., during the past 30 years. Name the act of criminality, cover-up or act of chicanery that has
taken place in Washington D.C., over the last 30 years, and William Barr is probably neck deep in it.
*Barr was a full-time CIA operative, recruited by Langley out of high
school, starting in 1971. Barr’s youth career goal was to head the CIA.
*CIA operative assigned to the
China directorate, where he became close to powerful CIA operative George H.W. Bush, whose accomplishments
already included the CIA/Cuba Bay of Pigs, Asia CIA operations (Vietnam War, Golden Triangle narcotics), Nixon
foreign policy (Henry Kissinger), and the Watergate operation.
*When George H.W. Bush became CIA
Director in 1976, Barr joined the CIA’s “legal office” and Bush’s inner circle, and worked alongside Bush’s
longtime CIA enforcers Theodore “Ted” Shackley, Felix Rodriguez, Thomas Clines, and others, several of whom were
likely involved with the Bay of Pigs/John F. Kennedy assassination, and numerous southeast Asian operations,
from the Phoenix Program to Golden Triangle narco-trafficking.
*Barr stonewalled and destroyed the
Church Committee investigations into CIA abuses.
*Barr stonewalled and stopped
inquiries in the CIA bombing assassination of Chilean opposition leader Orlando Letelier.
*Barr joined George H.W. Bush’s
legal/intelligence team during Bush’s vice presidency (under President Ronald Reagan). Rose from assistant
attorney general to Chief Legal Counsel to attorney general (1991) during the Bush 41 presidency.
*Barr was a key player in the
Iran-Contra operation, if not the most important member of the apparatus, simultaneously managing the operation
while also “fixing” the legal end, ensuring that all of the operatives could do their jobs without fear of
exposure or arrest.
*In his attorney general
confirmation, Barr vowed to “attack criminal organizations,” drug smugglers and money launderers. It was all hot
air: as AG, Barr would preserve, protect, cover up, and nurture the apparatus that he helped create, and use
Justice Department power to escape punishment.
*Barr stonewalled and stopped
investigations into all Bush/Clinton and CIA crimes, including BCCI and BNL CIA drug banking, the theft of
Inslaw/PROMIS software, and all crimes of state committed by Bush.
*Barr provided legal cover for
Bush’s illegal foreign policy and war crimes.
*Barr left Washington, and went
through the “rotating door” to the corporate world, where he took on numerous directorships and counsel
positions for major companies. In 2007 and again from 2017, Barr was counsel for politically connected
international law firmKirkland & Ellis. Among its other notable attorneys and alumni are Kenneth Starr, John
Bolton, Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and numerous Trump administration attorneys. K&E’s clients
include sex trafficker/pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital.
If all of this isn’t bad enough,
William Bar is a co-conspirator in the murders of Vicki and Sammy Weaver at Ruby Ridge,
Idaho.James Bovard tells the story:
The Senate Judiciary Committee
hearings for Attorney General nominee William Barr have focused heavily on Barr’s views on Special Counsel
Robert Mueller. But nobody is asking about Barr’s legal crusade for blanket immunity for federal agents who
killed American citizens.
Barr received a routine
questionnaire from the Judiciary Committee asking him to disclose his past work including pro bono activities
“serving the disadvantaged.” The “disadvantaged” that Barr spent the most time helping was an FBI agent who
slayed an Idaho mother holding her baby in 1992. Barr spent two weeksorganizing former Attorneys General and others to support “an FBI sniper in
defending against criminal charges in connection with the Ruby Ridge incident.” Barr also “assisted in framing
legal arguments advanced… in the district court and the subsequent appeal to the Ninth Circuit,” he told the
committee.
That charitable work (for an FBI
agent who already had a federally paid law firm defending him) helped tamp down one of the biggest scandals
during Barr’s time as Attorney General from 1991 to early 1993. Barr was responsible for both the U.S. Marshals
Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, two federal agencies whose misconduct at Ruby Ridge
“helped to weaken the bond of trust that must exist between ordinary Americans
and our law enforcement agencies,” according to a 1995 Senate Judiciary Committee report.
After Randy Weaver, an outspoken
white separatist living on a mountaintop in northern Idaho, was entrapped by an undercover federal agent, U.S.
marshals trespassed on Weaver’s land and killed his 14-year-old son, Sammy [by shooting him in the back]. The
following day, FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi killed his wife, Vicki, as she was standing in the cabin doorway [holding
her baby in her arms]. Horiuchi had previously shot Randy Weaver in the back after he stepped out of the cabin.
The suspects were never given a warning or a chance to surrender and had taken no action against FBI agents.
Weaver survived.
Barr told
theNew York Times in 1993 that he was not directly involved in the
Ruby Ridge operation. Two years later, the Washington Post revealed that “top officials of the Bush Justice
Department had at least 20 [phone] contacts concerning Ruby Ridge in the 24 hours before Vicki Weaver was shot,”
including two calls involving Barr.
In January 1995, FBI director Louis
Freeh announced wrist slaps for the FBI officials involved, including his friend Larry Potts, who supervised the
operation from headquarters and who approved the shoot-without-provocation orders that “contravened the
constitution of the United States,” according to the Justice Department internal report.
When Attorney General Janet Reno
later nominated Potts for deputy director of the FBI, top newspapers and members of Congress protested, but Barr
told theNew York Times that his friend Potts “was deliberate and careful, and I developed a great deal of confidence in his
judgment… I can’t think of enough good things to say about him.” A few months later, the FBI suspended Potts after suspected perjury regarding Ruby Ridge. (Potts was
not charged and retired two years later.)
The Justice Department paid $3
million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit from the Weaver family. But when Boundary County, Idaho filed
criminal charges against Horiuchi, Barr sprang to action seeking immunity for FBI snipers. He spearheaded
efforts to sway the court to dismiss all charges because holding a sniper liable would “severely undermine, if not cripple, the ability of future attorneys general to rely on such
specialized units in moments of crisis such as hostage taking and terrorist acts.”
When the Justice Department won an
initial appeals court victory in the case in 2000, federal judge Alex Kozinski warned in a dissent of a
newJames Bond “007 standard for the use of deadly force” against American
citizens. The same court reversed that decision the following year. Kozinski, writing for the majority,
declared: “A group of FBI agents formulated rules of engagement that permitted their
colleagues to hide in the bushes and gun down men who posed no immediate threat. Such wartime rules are patently
unconstitutional for a police action.”
Does William Barr still endorse
“wartime rules” and a “007 standard” that absolve federal agents for questionable shootings of Americans?
Does Barr consider “illegal government killings” to be an oxymoron? Best of all, can Barr explain to us
his understanding of the phrase “government under the law”?
In addition, as far as William Barr
is concerned, the Fourth Amendment does not even exist. Senator Rand Paul notes that Barr "has been a big supporter
of the PATRIOT Act, which lowered the standard for spying on Americans, and he even went so far as to say the
PATRIOT Act was pretty good — we should go much further."
Rand also said that Barr is a “big
fan” of seizing people’s property through civil asset forfeiture. Rand continued by saying that “the first things
I’ve learned about him [Barr] being for more surveillance of Americans is very, very troubling.”
Furthermore (yes, there is more),
William Barr told liberal gun grabber Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) in his senate confirmation hearing for
becoming America’s next attorney general that he fully intends to push forward with Donald Trump’s Hitlerian “take
the guns first, go through due process second” gun confiscation laws, also known as “red flag” laws. And remember:
It was Donald Trump, not Barack Obama, who gave us more gun control by outlawing “bump stocks.”
Yep! The promise to protect the
Second Amendment is another promise Trump has broken (that’s Number Six).
“Red flag” gun confiscation laws
are the same kind of laws that were used to confiscate the weapons of undesirables (meaning anyone the state
doesn’t like) in Hitler’s Germany, Stalin’s Russia, Mao’s China—and in every despotic nation of the
world.
And here isWilliam Barr’s statement that “red flag” gun confiscation laws are the “single most
important thing” government can do regarding gun control.
Internet blogger and longtime
supporter of Donald Trump, Carl F. Worden, recently wrote this:
Now I can understand how Trump fell
for the wrongful nominations of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray.
That was early-on in Trump's presidency and Trump had no way of knowing those he trusted for advice were
in fact Deep State maggots intent on destroying his presidency. But this is a solid two years into Trump's
first term, and it is more than obvious that Barr will not be a team player for Trump -- or us! In fact, Barr
has a very troubling record on Second Amendment issues.
At this time, I have no confidence
left in Donald J. Trump. He is either a complete fool, or he knows exactly what he's doing, and either way
he's not fit to represent me anymore.
No more excuses, Mr.
Trump!
Bravo, Carl!
Sadly, a host of Trump’s supporters
continue to be bamboozled by the elaborate psyops misinformation (translated: propaganda) entity known
asQAnon, which keeps reassuring the Trump faithful that he is covertly waging war against the
globalist insiders and that any day now the curtain is going to collapse on the swamp creatures. It’s all a hoax
to give Trump cover—and more time.
If the nomination of William Barr
as America’s next “Top Cop” doesn’t awaken the “Always Trumpers,” there is absolutely no hope for them. Even worse
is the fact that the longer Christians and conservatives continue to make excuses for Trump’s lies and deceptions,
there is less and less hope for America.
Many pastors and Christians are under the devilish delusion that
the Bible promotes pacifism and non-resistance to tyrannical government. They believe and teach
that, if government decides to outlaw firearms, Christians should sheepishly surrender their arms.
These believers do not understand the Natural and Scriptural doctrine of self-defense.
In this message, Pastor Baldwin examines the life of Abraham as
found in Genesis 14. This is an extremely important chapter of the Bible as it establishes several
laws and principles given by God. This chapter introduces us to Melchizedek, the king and priest of
Jerusalem who blessed Abraham after he had returned from "the slaughter of the kings" in defense of
the inhabitants of the city of Sodom. Hebrews 7 retells the story of Genesis 14 and makes it clear
that Melchizedek was either Christ Himself or a great type of Christ.
The timing of Christ's blessing of Abraham, and his establishment
of several monumental doctrines for mankind, occurring following Abraham's armed defense of his
family and community is extremely significant—and almost universally ignored and overlooked in
modern churches.
As the title of the message states, this is "A Biblical Portrait Of
The Righteousness And Requirement of Bearing Arms." Bearing arms for self-defense—which in the
modern world points to AR-15-style rifles—is both RIGHTEOUS and REQUIRED of us by the laws of God.
(Cont Nxt Column)
Unless you are over sixty-years-old, it is very likely that you
have never heard a message like this before--and with the kind of compromising, watered-down
preaching heard in most churches today, if you don't watch this one, you may never hear one like it
in your lifetime.
But the truths of this message are undeniable and sacrosanct. And
with the way that government--and many churches--are promoting the outlawing and surrender of
AR-15-style rifles, this message is absolutely essential to the understanding of God's law on this
subject--not to mention the survival of liberty in our land.
Today the debate over firearms rages, and on the heels of national
tragedy and death, schools and other places have become "gun-free zones"—and killing fields. In
addition, many in government are attempting to pass laws disarming the American people, beginning
with banning AR-15 rifles. And, sadly, a host of pastors and churches are telling their
congregations that Christians are obligated to surrender their firearms should civil government
require them to do so. Such teaching is an egregious violation of the Word of God.
Written by Dr. Chuck Baldwin and his son, Attorney Tim Baldwin, "To
Keep or Not To Keep: Why Christians Should Not Give Up Their Guns" is a CLASSIC defense of the
right to keep and bear arms—not just from a Constitutional perspective—but from a Biblical one. We
don't know of another book like this one on the market today.
Read this book and you will see why NO ONE—Christian or
otherwise—should surrender their arms and why stripping Americans of their right to keep and bear
the AR-15 rifle in particular is to in effect disarm the citizenry.
Pastor Baldwin is so determined to maintain the right to possess
the AR-15 rifle that he has said, "When my AR-15 rifle is outlawed, I will be an outlaw." This bold
statement is spoken not only out of adherence to the Second Amendment but more importantly out of
adherence to God's Natural and Biblical laws. This book brilliantly explains those eternal
laws.
Not since British troops marched on Lexington and Concord,
Massachusetts, during the early morning of April 19, 1775, to seize the weapons of the colonists
has the American people's right to keep and bear arms been under such a direct attack.
Dr. Baldwin has shown in previous messages the Biblical duty of
self-defense. In this message, he uses Nehemiah 4, the Book of Judges, Esther, Romans 15:4, and
Ephesians 6:12 to show that the attacks against armed men are as much spiritual in nature as they
are political and physical.
Pastor Baldwin goes on to show how Christians need to be watchful
and alert to these attacks and be prepared to repel these attacks with both spiritual and Natural
armor.
Humanly speaking, the only thing keeping America's (and the rest of
the free world's) liberties intact (to the degree that they are) is the fact that America is an
ARMED citizenry. Remove the arms from the American people, and the entire world would plunge into a
500-year period of medievalesque Dark Ages.
This message is absolutely vital to the understanding of God's
truth relative to the subject of Christian liberty and the duty of men to protect it.
*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial
opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this
link:
Trump's
Speech After Shootings Paves Way
For A Dramatic Loss Of Rights, Censorship & PreCrime
An Open Letter To Our Legislators, Judges And Lawmen
LibertyFellowshipMT
Published on Mar 17, 2019
These letter was written by Dr. Chuck Baldwin and read live prior to the message preached by
Pastor Chuck Baldwin on Sunday, March 17, 2019 during the service at Liberty Fellowship.
Pastor Chuck Baldwin Exposes Donald
Trump's Broken Promise To Protect The 2nd
Amendment
Donald Trump promised the American people that he would protect our 2nd Amendment. No promise Trump
made was more emphatic than his promise to protect the 2nd Amendment.
But now President Trump has joined anti-gun Democrats by becoming the loudest proponent for more
draconian gun control laws, including universal background checks and "red flag" gun confiscation laws.
Donald Trump's betrayal of the 2nd Amendment is inexcusable--and unforgivable.
The NRA is compromised and in complete disarray and will be no help. It is up to the people who
voted for Donald Trump to stop this. If they do not rise up en masse NOW and let Trump know in no uncertain terms
that he has lost their vote FOREVER if he enacts these egregious gun control and gun confiscation laws, Trump will
go down in history as having enacted more communistic gun control laws than any president since Lyndon Baines
Johnson in the 1960s.
In this video, Pastor Baldwin presents the clarion call for everyone in America who cherishes their
right to keep and bear arms to rally en masse against these police-state gun control laws before it's too late.
This is not about Republicans or Democrats, right or left or who wins an election. The right to
keep and bear arms is more important than any election and any political party. The right to keep and bear arms is
about FREEDOM.
Please share this video with as many friends and loved ones as you can. We only have a short time
to stop these Orwellian gun control laws from coming into existence. We only have a short time to make Donald Trump
accountable to his promise to protect the 2nd Amendment.
"We are not talking about gun control. We are talking about
GUN CONFISCATION." - Chuck
Baldwin, This Is Deadly Serious! March 14, 2019 -
UN Accelerates Plan For Global Gun
Confiscation After Collapse United Nations hiring 'disarmament,
demobilization and reintegration' officers
The United Nations is gearing up for gun
confiscation in the event of a societal collapse in numerous countries by hiring “disarmament, demobilization and
reintegration” officers who will be trained to seize guns “from the civilian population.”
A posting on the
United Nations Career Opportunities page announces a vacancy for the position of “Disarmament,
Demobilization and Reintegration Officer” under the UN’s Department of Peacekeeping Operations based out of New
York.
UN Publicly Prepares For Gun Confiscation In
US
We know they have been planning it for years, and the documents are legion. Now they are
preparing to go operational.
The UN’s page on DDR operations explains what role the DDR officer
will be expected to undertake;
Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of
small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons from combatants and often from the civilian
population.
Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active
combatants from armed forces and groups, including a phase of “reinsertion” which provides short-term
assistance to ex-combatants.
Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian
status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is a political, social and economic process with an open
time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level.
The objective of the DDR process is to contribute to security and stability in post-conflict
environments so that recovery and development can begin. DDR helps create an enabling environment for political
and peace processes by dealing with security problem that arises when ex-combatants are trying to adjust to
normal life, during the vital transition period from conflict to peace and development.
Although the posting prompted feverish speculation that the UN was about to embark on a mass gun
confiscation program within the United States, it’s important to note that the DDR program is only currently active
in countries like the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ivory Coast and Haiti.
However, concerns are understandable given the acceleration in anti-Second Amendment rhetoric and
executive action on behalf of the Obama administration since the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre.
During a town hall event last week, Hillary Clinton asserted that gun control opponents should not be allowed
to hold an opinion that “terrorizes” America.
Earlier this month, President Barack
Obama also cited Australia’s draconian gun confiscation program as an example to be followed by the
U.S.
“It’s no secret that the US government has been preparing riot gear, guns, ammunition, and
detention centers for a
major calamity that will likely involve violence and widespread civil
unrest,”
writes Mac Slavo. Should such an event ever take place the first order of business will include a declaration
of martial law. And just as we saw during Hurricane Katrina, when the U.S. Constitution has been suspended gun
confiscation is soon to follow.”
Since the 1990′s, Alex Jones and Infowars reporters have attended numerous urban warfare training
drills inside the United States, many of which included exercises based around disarming American citizens. Foreign
troops were also present at many of these drills.
Infowars first became aware of this story a week ago having been contacted by active duty military
officials who saw the advertisement before it was posted publicly and we are currently working on a deeper angle
that promises to provide further insight.
For anyone who still doubts that domestic gun confiscation would be plausible in the aftermath of a
catastrophe, watch the short documentary below which highlights how authorities exploited Hurricane Katrina to
seize firearms, including those belonging to residents who weren’t even affected by the disaster.
The National Rifle Association has obtained a Department of Justice memo
calling for national gun registration and confiscation. The nine page “cursory summary” on current gun control
initiatives was not officially released by the Obama administration.
The DOJ memo (downloadable here as a PDF) states the administration “believes that a gun ban will not work
without mandatory gun confiscation,” according to the NRA, and thinks universal background checks “won’t work
without requiring national gun registration.” Obama has yet to publicly support national registration or
firearms confiscation, although the memo reveals his administration is moving in that direction.
The memo stands in stark contrast to the administration’s public stance on so-called gun control. White House
spokesman Jay Carney said last month that laws proposed by Obama would not “take away a gun from a single
law-abiding American.”
The NRA declined to explain how it obtained the document. The memo was written by the acting director of the
Justice Department’s National Institute of Justice, Greg Ridgeway. It is dated January 4, two weeks before Obama
mounted his attack on the Second Amendment following the Sandy Hook massacre. Ridgeway came to the Justice
Department from the RAND corporation.
The memo says universal background checks on firearms purchases may help the government push to control and
eventually outlaw firearms, but it would lead to an increase in illegally purchased guns.
It pointed out that banning high capacity ammunition clips would be ineffective due to the fact there is a large
number of them already in circulation.
A Justice Department official
said the memo is an unfinished review of gun violence research and does not represent administration policy.
The DOJ memo arrived a few weeks prior to a letter sent out by the Department of
Veterans Affairs. “A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or
transporting a firearm or ammunition,” the sent to military veterans states. “If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned,
or both pursuant to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Pub.L.No. 103-159, as implemented at 18, United
States Code 924(a)(2).”
“US veterans are receiving letters from the government informing them that they are
disabled and not allowed to own, purchase or possess a firearm. If the veteran does decide to purchase a firearm he
will by fined, imprisoned or both,” the Gateway Pundit remarked.
NRA’s Chris Cox talks about the DOJ memo:
Ask Obama's Experts
The Untold Story of Gun Confiscation After
Katrina
America:
Your Guns Are Being Taken And You Don't Even Know
It
California Democrat senator Dianne Feinstein reveals the
government agenda — confiscation:
Dianne Feinstein on Gun Ban in 1995 - "Mr. and Mrs.
America, turn your gun in!"
Foreign Troops Training To Confiscate Guns of
Americans
American troops were ordered to conduct door-to-door
gun confiscation sweeps
after Hurricane Katrina, and while it has emerged that
at least one unit stood down and refused the order, many more carried out the unconstitutional mission.
That precedent has been followed by other exercises training American soldiers for gun seizures, along with other
martial law measures.
Infowars Nightly News co-host Rob Dew underscored the history of training to take American guns in his
recent viral
report:
Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In
Guns
Meanwhile, the United Nations itself has forcibly disarmed
numerous African nations using foreign troops, and the vacuum of power has led in several cases to genocidal
atrocities as a direct result of taking away arms. The genocide in Rwanda was enabled by forcible
disarmament. As Republic
Magazine writes, the mass murder was “carried out by government-aligned Hutu tribal militias against a targeted
ethnic population – the Tutsis – who had been disarmed with the help of UN “peacekeeping” forces under the
supervision of future UN Secretary General Kofi Annan.” The Darfur crisis in Sudan also has its roots
in UN-led population disarmament, as does the Burma
(Myanmar) massacre, again the result of disarmament. Armed
troops representing international interests including the World Bank burned
down homes and killed children in effort to forcibly evict some 40,000 Ugandans on the basis of conserving
lands to combat climate change.
Indeed, genocide and disarmed populations go hand-in-hand through history– just look at the history of
Democide (death by government). R.J. Rummel at the
University of Hawaii is the leading academic on the subject, and has estimated that more than 262 million unnatural deaths in the 20th Century
alone were caused by government, and most were at the hands of despots preying upon their helpless peoples. From
Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia, to Turkey, Armenia and beyond, gun bans have created a shift in the balance
of power towards the state, creating an atmosphere of victim disarmament.
Blue helmets or foreign uniforms have no place on foreign soil, yet the UN Arms Trade Treaty text reveals a
mechanism to impose just that type of control– even in America.
Did You Know a Law Is On The Books to Disarm All
Americans?
Law provides impetus for "ultimate world
disarmament" and U.N. control over military
Public law 87-297, the Arms Control and Disarmament
Act signed by President Kennedy in 1961, provides an impetus to not only ban civilian firearm ownership
but to also transfer control of the U.S. military to the United Nations.
“It is the purpose of this Act to provide impetus toward this goal by creating a new agency of peace to deal
with the problem of reduction and control of armaments looking toward ultimate world disarmament,” the law
states.
The law was based primarily on State Department
Publication 7277, The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World,
which advocates the complete disarmament of every country in favor of a permanent U.N. military force:
DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES
The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to
common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world
which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which
adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives
toward which nations should direct their efforts:
The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form
whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace
Force;
The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the
means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining
internal order;
The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of
disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations;
The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework
of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.
“The right to own, buy, sell, trade, or transfer all means of armed resistance, including handguns, is denied to
civilians by [Article 2] of the Arms Trade Treaty,” wrote Joe Wolverton II of the New American. “Article 3 places the ‘ammunition/munitions fired, launched or delivered
by the conventional arms covered under Article 2′ within the scope of the treaty’s prohibitions, as well.”
New law would link gun registry with criminal
database
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
March 5, 2014
Authorities in Maryland are set to target
110,000 citizens with gun confiscation under a new law that would link the state’s gun registry with its criminal
database, with new troopers set to be hired to enforce door to door visits of illegal gun owners.
Maryland State Police complain that there is no way for them to identify gun owners
who have been convicted of felonies, meaning they can’t check if weapons have been relinquished in accordance
with state law.
New legislation being considered by the Maryland House of Delegates would allow police to run
checks of the state’s gun registry against its criminal database at least twice a year at a cost of $300,000
dollars to create the new system.
“State Police estimate that if they linked the databases, they would find 10 percent of registered
gun owners — about 110,000 people — would be disqualified. They estimate a rate of 1 percent each year thereafter,”
reports the
Associated Press, adding that “seven new full-time troopers to investigate findings from the new database,”
would be hired, “with a cost of more than $1 million a year for salaries and equipment.”
In other words, more armed police would be needed to conduct dangerous door to door gun
confiscations of the thousands of people that would be snagged under the new law.
“This smacks of a police state mentality,” said Maryland resident Ronald Smith in written testimony
before a hearing on Tuesday.
While the law is ostensibly aimed at disarming criminals, we have seen a steady expansion of
reasons that are being applied to bar Americans from owning firearms. The law also creates a chilling effect on the
second amendment by implying that gun owners are all guilty until proven innocent.
Last year we reported on
how US Navy Veteran David A Schmecker had his guns confiscated by police after a forced “psychiatric evaluation”
despite him having no criminal or psychiatric history.
In August 2012, we reported on how a
veteran in Ohio had his guns taken because he was adjudged to be mentally incompetent, despite the fact that his
previous VA psychiatric evaluations were all clear, he was not on medication, and he had no criminal record.
In February
2012, David Sarti, one of the stars of National Geographic’s Doomsday Preppers show, visited his
doctor complaining of chest pains, only to have the doctor later commit him to a psychiatric ward and alert
authorities, before Sarti was declared “mentally defective” and put on an FBI list that stripped him of his second
amendment rights.
Maryland’s preparations for gun confiscation arrive on the back of a similar showdown in
Connecticut, where a vast majority of residents refused to register their assault rifles and high capacity
magazines in accordance with a new law that took effect on January 1. Gun groups are now challenging authorities to
either proceed with mass gun confiscation or repeal the law in full.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is
the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
This article was posted: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 at 5:47 am
NYC mayor warns that group promotes “confiscation of guns
from law-abiding citizens”
Adan Salazar
Infowars.com
February 10, 2014
Nearly 50 mayors have jumped ship on former NYC Mayor
Michael Bloomberg’s “Mayors Against Illegal Guns” campaign over allegations that the group’s ultimate goal is
outright gun confiscation, according to one former member.
As reported, Poughkeepsie Mayor John Tkazyik published a
statement in last week’s Poughkeepsie Journal coming clean about the group’s true intentions,
total disarmament of law-abiding gun owners.
“Under the guise of helping mayors facing a crime and drug epidemic, MAIG intended to promote confiscation of
guns from law-abiding citizens,” Tkazyik said, confirming what many already suspected about the group.
“Nearly 50 pro-Second Amendment mayors have left the organization. They left for the same reason I did,” he also
added.
The fact that 50 mayors bailed in response to a concerted effort to undermine the Bill of Rights is certainly
headline-worthy, but so far, unsurprisingly, few other media outlets have picked the story up.
And Tkazyik isn’t the first to cast these allegations. In 2007, the mayor of Williamsport, Pa., also said she
left after witnessing “dubious” attempts to subvert the Second Amendment. “I have learned that the coalition may be
working on issues which conflict with legal gun ownership, and that some actions on your behalf are dubious,”
then-Williamsport Mayor Mary Wolf wrote in a letter to Bloomberg himself.
And just last year, during a Mothers Demand Action rally (a gun control coalition which merged with MAIG in December 2013), Austin, Texas City Councilman Mike Martinez singled out a protestor carrying a “Stop the Gun Ban” sign and told him,
“…there is no gun ban currently, but because of the work we’re doing here today, we will make your sign
legitimate shortly, so you hang on to that.”
News of the group’s traitorous crusade comes at a time when American gun owners are already wary of continual
attempts to curtail firearm ownership. Since the Sandy Hook school shooting, the Obama administration has proposed
legislation aimed at combating “gun violence,” including proposals that would require background checks for all gun
sales; in effect, registration.
American gun owners who know the history behind gun control are fearful that a federal gun registry will eventually lead
to confiscation. Indeed, numerous articles have been published showing how, since 2007, roving law enforcement
teams have been disarming Californians deemed “illegal” using a list of owners.
The fact that groups like MAIG are to the point of openly
bragging about their intentions doesn’t bode well for gun owners. It signifies the establishment is preparing to
take grand strides to convince the American public of the “dangers” posed by guns. That means more contrived scenes
of violence with guns at their center.
The fact that Obama has repeatedly asserted his willingness to work around Congress to make things happen is
also worrying. In his 2014 State of the Union speech he also mentioned that his administration would continue
to address “gun violence,” and that he intends to “keep trying, with or without Congress, to help stop more
tragedies from visiting innocent Americans in our movie theaters and our shopping malls, or schools like Sandy
Hook.”
It should now be abundantly clear that any reassurances, given by known liars such as Obama or any of his
anti-Second Amendment teams, are merely to placate gun owners into a state of pacification and complacency.
However, the jig is now up and the curtain has been lifted.
Overall, 50 mayors bailing on the group over its future plans shows a definite sea change in the way public
servants are regarding citizens’ rights and the Second Amendment. However, it is simply incredible that more
mayors, knowing the treasonous goals of the organization, have not abandoned ship.
Poughkeepsie, N.Y. mayor says he left the group over
confiscation plans
Kit Daniels
Infowars.com
February 7, 2014
A current New York mayor has publicly announced his decision to leave
Mayors Against Illegal Guns because the gun control group demands an all-out “confiscation of guns from
law-abiding citizens.”
Former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg co-founded Mayors Against Illegal Guns
in 2006 to promote gun control.
In an announcement published by his city’s
newspaper, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. Mayor John C. Tkazyik said he quit the group after realizing it was simply a
vehicle for Michael Bloomberg to “promote his personal gun-control agenda.”
“It did not take long to realize that MAIG’s agenda was much more than ridding felons of illegal guns,” he
stated. “Under the guise of helping mayors facing a crime and drug epidemic, MAIG intended to promote confiscation
of guns from law-abiding citizens.”
“I don’t believe, never have believed and never will believe that public safety is enhanced by encroaching on
our right to bear arms and I will not be a part of any organization that does.”
Tkazyik also pointed out that Chicago’s extremely high crime rates are undeterred by the city’s highly
restrictive gun laws.
“Depriving law-abiding citizens of their right to own firearms only makes them more vulnerable,” he added.
Tkazyik’s announcement is a stark contrast to the rhetoric of other politicians who want to grossly violate
human rights.
At a gun control event earlier this year, Austin, Texas City Council Member Mike Martinez admitted that gun
control is simply a step-by-step process to completely eliminate the Second
Amendment.
While pointing at a sign held by a protestor which read “Stop Gun Ban,” Martinez said that “someone needs to
inform him that there is no gun ban currently, but because of the work we’re doing today, we will make [his] sign
legitimate shortly.”
“So you hang on to that [sign],” he said to a cheering crowd of gun control advocates.
And in a flashback to 1995, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Ca.)
told 60 Minutes that she wanted to outright ban all firearms owned by Americans.
“If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of
them … ‘Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in,’ I would have done it,” she said.
This is the true intent of gun control, even though many of its advocates whitewash the truth with a variety of
propaganda techniques or by just simply being ignorant.
For example, the organizers for the event at which Martinez spoke told reporters that they didn’t want to ban
guns even though that is exactly what Martinez demanded in his speech.
Gun control advocates constantly parrot deceptive phrases such as “common sense solutions” and “we don’t want to
ban guns” when selling their agenda which will only lead to the complete disarmament of the population by
authoritarians.
Fortunately, on the other hand, Mayor Tkazyik is joining an ever-increasing list of public officials who have
denounced gun control.
“Coming from California, where it takes an act of Congress to get a concealed weapon permit, I got to Maine,
where they give out lots of Carrying Concealed Weapon [permits], and I had a stack of CCW permits I was denying;
that was my orientation,” he said. “I changed my orientation real quick; Maine is one of the safest places in
America.”
“Clearly, suspects knew that good Americans were armed.”
And last year, Erie Co., N.Y. Sheriff Timothy B. Howard publicly announced that his department would not enforce
New York’s latest gun control law, the SAFE Act.
“It’s an unenforceable law and I believe it will ultimately be declared unconstitutional,” he said to reporters. “Do you want law enforcement people that will say
‘I will do this because I’m told to do this, even if I know it’s wrong?’”
It is refreshing to see elected officials serving their constituents while also respecting the Bill of
Rights.
This article was posted: Sunday, February 9, 2014 at 11:40 am
As reported by David Knight, California law enforcement is
now confiscating legally purchased guns from registered gun owners who have been labeled “Armed Prohibited Persons”
(APPs.)
Police shoved two M16s within inches of gun owner Joe
Mendez’s face during a raid on his house to seize his legally-purchased firearms.
Fourteen officers total were involved.
Police even showed up later to lie to Mendez’s wife about the raid, saying that they were only taking a report
after her car was involved in a “hit and run.”
All of the targeted APPs had purchased their firearms legally but the State of California declared afterwards
that they were prohibited from gun ownership due to minor misdemeanor convictions or mental health concerns.
Gov. Jerry Brown even signed a bill this past spring to expand the program by spending $24 million to hire
an additional 36 officers for a total of 69 agents to track down nearly 20,000 people on the APP list.
Before they can embark on gun confiscations, officers perform “tedious, expensive and time-consuming work,
requiring hours of background checks and cross-referencing,” as reported by
NPR.
“There’s a lot of work that goes into these,” said California Dept. of Justice spokesperson Michelle Gregory to
NPR. “People aren’t always home, there’s different stories as to where the firearms may be and there’s a lot of
follow-up [that] needs to happen after.”
“So there’s still going to be a lot of work even after they come out to these homes trying to confiscate these
weapons.”
Later on, the state can easily expand the list of “prohibited persons” to include even people who are behind on
their state taxes or did not pay their toll fees on time.
This is clear evidence that gun registration ultimately leads to confiscation.
This article was posted: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 at 11:41 am
The Military is out directing traffic during public events, armed drones are set to fly over
America with direction to track and trace law abiding gun owning citizens. The globalist police state grid has
been slowly tighten its grip around the American public for decades. Now, as the control grid reaches its final
stages and with the Bill of Rights almost completely destroyed, the globalists are playing the same card that
mass murdering tyrants have always played: disarming the public.
We Are Nearing The Tipping Point
(The
lies are getting too ridiculous.)
SHOCK VIDEO: Texas State Troopers
Openly Defy The Law and Confiscate Gun
NOTE: Call DPS and let them know their public servants need to follow the law. (512) 424-2000
Friday the 13th must be defy the law day for the Texas Department of Public Safety. A legal lawful open carry rally
at the capital became the site of a tyrannical abuse of power at the hands of our ignorant public servants. Terry
Holcomb of Texas Open Carry was arrested for carrying a black powder pistol even though the act is perfectly
legal.
We're in for The Fight of Our Lives
On the Thursday, March 7 edition of the Alex Jones Show, guest hosts Aaron Dykes and Paul
Joseph Watson discuss Rand Paul's historic filibuster in protest of drone strikes on American citizens (on U.S.
soil) with no due process, mainstream media's attempted cover up of the massive DHS ammo buy and the latest Syrian
crisis in which U.S. funded rebels have captured 21 U.N. peacekeepers. Alex Jones also give a special report on the
state of the union and what americans need to do to put a stop to the globalist plans to destroy america before
it's too damn late!
Gun confiscations begin in New York, aided by existing
firearms registry
Kit
Daniels
Infowars.com
November 27, 2013
In the wake of New York’s latest gun control law, the New
York Police Department is now sending out notices to registered gun owners demanding that they give up their
firearms, clear proof that gun registration leads to outright confiscations.
The notice provides gun owners, who possess firearms now prohibited under New York’s unconstitutional SAFE Act,
the “options” to either surrender their firearms to the police, remove them from the city limits or otherwise
render them inoperable.
The NYPD knew exactly who to send the notices to by using a centralized firearms registry which lists the city’s
gun owners and what firearms they have in their possession.
With the gun database already in place, the police merely needed to compile a list of firearm makes and models
now banned under the SAFE Act and send the notices to the appropriate owners.
The SAFE Act, which was passed by the state legislature and signed by the governor on the same day in January,
has numerous, draconian provisions including, but not limited to:
- Outright ban of magazines holding over 10 rounds
- Restriction on more than seven rounds being loaded into a magazine; the limited exceptions do not include home
defense
- Mandatory background checks for ammunition
- The creation of a firearms registry for what the state considers “assault weapons”
- A requirement for firearm permit holders to fill out a form to keep the state from publicly identifying them
These unconstitutional provisions and the overall law itself have met significant resistance.
Erie Co., N.Y. Sheriff Timothy B. Howard publicly stated that his department will not enforce the SAFE Act,
adding that the law is one of the strongest examples of the government not listening to the people.
“It’s an unenforceable law and I believe it will ultimately be declared unconstitutional,” he said during a press conference. “Do you want law enforcement people that will say ‘I will do this
because I’m told to do this, even if I know it’s wrong?’”
Earlier this month, Howard won his re-election due to his stance against the gun control law.
“The SAFE Act was a major issue in this [Erie Co. Sheriff] election,” Carl J. Calabrese, a political consultant,
said to the Buffalo News. “A lot of people in Erie County, both Republicans and Democrats,
are hunters, gun owners and shooters … These are motivated people who get out and vote.”
“In a low-turnout election year like this one, it can make a huge difference.”
Howard told the newspaper that he did what he thought was the right thing to do.
“People in Western New York feel strongly about the Constitution and Albany’s misreading of it,” he added.
While the NYPD’s notice proves that gun registration leads to outright confiscations, Howard’s re-election also
proves that Americans are beginning to reassert their birth rights as recognized by the Constitution.
In the video below, Alex Jones highlights how the
Guardian Centers video is yet another startling indication that authorities in the United States are preparing for
civil unrest as America increasingly begins to resemble a militarized police state.
Despite launching a gun
control agenda that threatens to disarm the American people, President Obama has signed a bill that would afford
him armed Secret Service protection for life.
Then they say things like, “Trump doesn’t really understand these issues; he
really wants to do right, but he’s getting bad advice.” BARF! If he didn’t understand the issues, he’s had two
full years as President of the United States to get caught up. But he continues to make the same
unconstitutional, big-government, warmongering decisions over and over again. The excuse that “he wants to do
right, but is getting bad advice” just doesn’t wash anymore. It’s time for Trump’s supporters to wake up and
realize that Donald Trump is a great big boy, not a little kid, and is fully capable of thinking for
himself.
*Barr was a full-time CIA operative, recruited by Langley out of high
school, starting in 1971. Barr’s youth career goal was to head the CIA.
Maryland State Police complain that there is no way for them to identify gun owners
who have been convicted of felonies, meaning they can’t check if weapons have been relinquished in accordance
with state law.
As reported
Fourteen officers total were involved.
