Look Into It - Aspartame is Made of GMO Bacteria Feces
welcome
Aspartame
“The artificial sweetener aspartame, a dipeptide with the formula Asp-Phe-me, is
produced using a cloned micrcorganism [sic]. A DNA which codes for a large stable peptide comprised of the
repeating amino acid sequence (Asp-Phe)n is inserted into a cloning vehicle which in turn is introduced into a
suitable host microorganism. The host microorganism is cultured and the large peptide containing the repeating
Asp-Phe sequence is harvested therefrom. The free carboxyl group of the large peptide is benzylated and then
hydrolysed to benzyl Asp-Phe dipeptides. This dipeptide is methylated and then debenzylated to
formaspartame.”
This scientific jargon obfuscates (perhaps deliberately) a truly disturbing
process:
1.) ‘Cloned microorganisms’ (which the patent later reveals to be genetically modified
E. coli) are cultivated in tanks whose environments are tailored to help them thrive.
2.) The well-fed E. coli cultures defecate the
proteins that contain the aspartic acid-phenylalanine amino acid segment needed to make
aspartame.
The
well-fedE. coli cultures defecate the proteins that contain the aspartic acid-phenylalanine amino acid
segment needed
to make aspartame.
(The Full Article Can Found Below)
Aspartame is Made of GMO Bacteria Feces
1
Aspartame is Made of GMO Bacteria Feces
2
Aspartame: The Bitter Truth Behind This Toxic
Sweetener
http://aspartame.mercola.com/ Watch this special video about aspartame and discover the
truth behind this toxic artificial sweetener. You may even be surprised how it affects your overall health.
Gum Sales Plummet
As Poison Discovered
Infowars.com
March 22, 2014
As gum sales plummet many believe its linked to the
public’s awareness of aspartame. Aspartame, the artificial sweetener made of the feces of genetically modified
bacteria.
This article was posted: Saturday, March 22, 2014 at 9:10 am
In his first book, written in 1994, Dr. Blaylock discusses the toxic effects of a number of food
additives, including MSG (monosodium glutamate), aspartame and L-cysteine. These chemicals are added to a broad
number of foods as a taste enhancing substance. In many cases several of these brain toxic additives are combined
with foods to give them a delicious taste. They are particularly targeted toward young people, and as he
shows, the developing brain is 5X more sensitive to the toxic effect than is the
adult brain.
The mechanism by which these food additives damage the brain is
called excitotoxicity, a mechanism in which certain brain cells are excited to
death.Most people have never heard the term excitotoxicity, but today,
neuroscientists consider excitotoxicity to be the central mechanism in a wide number of diseases, including
strokes, neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer’s dementia, Parkinson’s disease and ALS), heavy metal toxicity
(mercury, lead, cadmium and aluminum), infectious brain diseases (encephalitis and meningitis), autism, brain
trauma and multiple sclerosis.
This book goes into detail, not only concerning the excitotoxic process, but also what you can do
to protect you and your loved ones from excitotoxicity.
In 1999, The Independent published an article entitled “World’s
top sweetener is made with GM bacteria,” which revealed that Monsanto was knowingly adding aspartame to soft
drinks in the United States – and that aspartame is made from GM bacteria. This report, which remains one of
the earliest disclosures on aspartame in a mainstream newspaper, received little attention after its
publication – possibly because its implications were underestimated at the time – and it has long been
forgotten.
Since 1999, the world has become a little more attentive to Monsanto and aspartame, but ignorance still abounds
about the latter’s genesis. While more and more people are starting to awaken to aspartame’s destructive effects on
our health, do they know how it is actually made? Fortunately, a 1981 patent for aspartame production, once
confined to the drawers of patent offices, is now available online for everyone to see – and it confirms everything
that Monsanto was happy to tell us in 1999 before their meteoric growth necessitated greater prudence.
The production process
The patent, which is entitled Process for producing aspartame and is credited to Bahl, Rose, and
White, summarizes the process as follows:
“The artificial sweetener aspartame, a dipeptide with the formula Asp-Phe-me, is produced using a cloned
micrcorganism [sic]. A DNA which codes for a large stable peptide comprised of the repeating amino acid sequence
(Asp-Phe)n is inserted into a cloning vehicle which in turn is introduced into a suitable host microorganism. The
host microorganism is cultured and the large peptide containing the repeating Asp-Phe sequence is harvested
therefrom. The free carboxyl group of the large peptide is benzylated and then hydrolysed to benzyl Asp-Phe
dipeptides. This dipeptide is methylated and then debenzylated to form aspartame.”
This scientific jargon obfuscates (perhaps deliberately) a truly disturbing process:
1.) ‘Cloned microorganisms’ (which the patent later reveals to be genetically modified E. coli) are
cultivated in tanks whose environments are tailored to help them thrive.
2.) The well-fed E. coli cultures defecate the proteins that contain the aspartic acid-phenylalanine
amino acid segment needed to make aspartame.
3.) The proteins containing the Asp-Phe segments are ‘harvested’ (i.e. lab assistants collect the bacteria’s
feces).
4.) The feces are then treated. This includes a process of methylation (adding an excess of the toxic alcohol,
methanol, to the protected dipeptide).
While common sense dictates that this abomination doesn’t belong anywhere near our bodies, the patent’s authors
made no secret about their belief that aspartame constitutes a safe and nutritious sweetener:
“Aspartame is not only sweeter than sucrose, but is preferable as a food to sucrose. While sucrose can provide
the body with little more than energy, aspartame is composed of amino acids, the building blocks of body proteins,
and like other proteins is broken down by the digestive enzymes in the stomach to its constituent amino acids thus
providing nutritive value. [...] For these reasons, aspartame holds significant promise in replacing sugar as a
sweetener.”
So there we have it: An official document that not only reveals the shocking truth behind aspartame production,
but also freely admits that it was intended for mass consumption as a sucrose substitute. Therefore, the next time
someone claims that your reservations about this sweetener are unfounded, direct them to this patent – the truth
behind aspartame is now in plain view.
About the author:
Michael Ravensthorpe is an independent writer whose research interests include nutrition, alternative medicine, and
bushcraft. He is the creator of the website Spiritfoods, through which he
promotes the world’s healthiest foods, whether they be established superfruits such as mangosteen or lesser-known
health supplements like blackstrap
molasses.
Aspartame: The Dangers and Side Effects (Part 1 of
3)
http://products.mercola.com/sweet-mis... Dr. Joseph Mercola, author of two New York
Times best-sellers, exposes the questionable history of aspartame and why you should stay away from this
dangerous artificial sweetener if you care for your health. (Part 1 of 3)
Aspartame: The Dangers and Side Effects (Part 2 of
3)
http://products.mercola.com/sweet-mis... Dr. Joseph Mercola, author of two New York
Times best-sellers, exposes the questionable history of aspartame and why you should stay away from this
dangerous artificial sweetener if you care for your health. (Part 2 of 3)
Aspartame: The Dangers and Side Effects (Part 3 of
3)
http://products.mercola.com/sweet-mis... Dr. Joseph Mercola, author of two New York
Times best-sellers, exposes the questionable history of aspartame and why you should stay away from this
dangerous artificial sweetener if you care for your health. (Part 3 of 3)
Alex Jones: Taylor Swift
‘loves genetically-modified
bacteria poop’
Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who earlier this year led
the push to have CNN
host Piers Morgan deported, is now calling on singer Taylor Swift to stop endorsing Diet Coke.
Jones’ criticism, released on Friday, hinges on the soda containing the sweetener Aspartame, which some studies
have linked to different kinds of cancer. The
substance, he said, is the result of a 1960s Pentagon study that sought to produce genetically-engineered e-coli
bacteria, meaning that soda drinkers were drinking “the feces” of the results.
The 23-year-old country and pop singer announced an endorsement deal with the company earlier this week, calling the drink “one of the
great loves of my life” in a video posted on YouTube.
“So in essence, Taylor Swift is telling us, she loves genetically-modified bacteria poop,” Jones said in
response.
Taylor Swift's Dirty Little Secret Will Make You
Sick
Taylor Swift just announced a sponsorship deal with the love of her live Diet Coke.
Infowars.com feels that she should be made aware of the dangers of aspartame the main sweetener in diet coke which
is linked to many adverse health effects. Please get this video to Taylor Swift and hopefully she can educate
herself and her fans.
NutraSweet Company brags about the second coming of aspartame: Neotame now taking over world
markets
Mike Adams talks about Neotame
(NaturalNews)
When the
NutraSweet Company first began petitioning the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to approve aspartame as a
food additive back in the early 1970s, it had every intention of conniving its way to success by whatever means
possible. Today, after successfully getting aspartame approved and widely accepted around the world with flawed
studies and behind-the-scenes manipulation, NutraSweet has once again done the same thing with a new chemical
sweetener known as neotame, which is currently approved for use in food without even having to be
labeled.
As we reported on recently, neotame was approved by the FDA back in 2002 without so
much as a single conclusive, independent study proving its safety for human consumption. And yet the agency gave
its full blessing not only to neotame's approval for use in food, but also for its unlabeled use -- as far as we
know, not a single food product currently sold in the U.S. indicates that it contains neotame (http://www.naturalnews.com/034915_neotame_Monsanto_sweeteners.html).
Two years before the FDA approved neotame, the Monsanto Co. sold the NutraSweet Co.
to J.W. Childs Equity Partners II, L.P., a private equity firm that also own the Sunny Delight Beverage Co. and
Mattress Firm, among other companies. At the time of this purchase, NutraSweet issued a press release bragging
about how neotame would drastically change the sweetener industry, even though it had not yet been approved for
use.
Commenting on the company's plans for neotame, Nick E. Rosa, a former senior vice
president at Monsanto who was given the position of president and CEO of NutraSweet at the time the company
transferred ownership to J.W. Childs, had this to say:
"The NutraSweet Company revolutionized the sweetener industry in 1981 with the
introduction of aspartame, and we intend to do it again with neotame when we receive approval from various
regulatory agencies around the world."
Just as predicted, NutraSweet strong-armed FDA approval for neotame in the U.S. in
2002, and quickly expanded approval to at least 69 other countries in the following decade. But the company
presumably still has a lot of work to do if it hopes to bring neotame to the same level as aspartame, which is sold
in more than 100 countries and used in more than 5,000 consumers products used by 250 million people
worldwide.
As detrimental as aspartame is to health, neotame is potentially far worse. Like
aspartame, it is linked to severe neurotoxic and immunotoxic damage because it metabolizes into toxic formaldehyde
and other toxic substances. And because it is unlabeled, the general public is unable to self-regulate consumption
levels.
Infowars Special Report With Mike Adams
The Huge Secret GMO Cloning Program
They Are Turning Our Crops, Animals And Even Our Babies Into
Freakish Genetic Monsters
The greatest environmental threat that we are facing is genetic modification. All over
the globe, scientists are treating the fabric of life as if it was a playground where anything goes. Behind
closed doors, scientists all over the planet are creating some of the most freakish and most bizarre monsters
that you could possible imagine, and very few people seem concerned about it. But the truth is that messing with
the building blocks of life is going to have some very serious consequences.
There's nothing they are leaving
untouched: the mustard, the okra, the bringe oil, the rice, the cauliflower. Once they have established the norm:
that seed can be owned as their property, royalties can be collected. We will depend on them for every seed we grow
of every crop we grow. If they control seed, they control food, they know it -- it's strategic. It's more powerful
than bombs. It's more powerful than guns. This is the best way to control the populations of the world. The story
starts in the White House, where Monsanto often got its way by exerting disproportionate influence over
policymakers via the "revolving door". One example is Michael Taylor, who worked for Monsanto as an attorney before
being appointed as deputy commissioner of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1991. While at the FDA, the
authority that deals with all US food approvals, Taylor made crucial decisions that led to the approval of GE foods
and crops. Then he returned to Monsanto, becoming the company's vice president for public policy.
Thanks to these intimate links between Monsanto and government agencies, the US adopted GE foods and crops without
proper testing, without consumer labeling and in spite of serious questions hanging over their safety. Not
coincidentally, Monsanto supplies 90 percent of the GE seeds used by the US market. Monsanto's long arm stretched
so far that, in the early nineties, the US Food and Drugs Agency even ignored warnings of their own scientists, who
were cautioning that GE crops could cause negative health effects. Other tactics the company uses to stifle
concerns about their products include misleading advertising, bribery and concealing scientific evidence.
It is hardly surprising that the first thing Bayer did after completing their takeover of
Monsanto earlier this month was to announce that they were dropping the Monsanto name, merging the two companies'
agrichemical divisions under the Bayer Crop Science name. After all, as everyone knows, Monsanto is one of the most
hated corporations in the world. But Bayer itself has an equally atrocious history of death and destruction.
Together they are a match made in hell.
REACH OUT TO OTHERS
[Help Educate Family And Friends With This Page And The Links Below]