“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat
of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by
human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real
enemy then, is humanity itself.”
Breaking! Head Climate Monger Jumps
Ship: Marc Morano Reports
By Marc Morano MSNBC, perhaps
the most unlikely of news sources, reports on what may be seen as
the official end of the man-made global warming fear movement. http://www.climatedepot.com/
MSNBC April 23,
2012: 'Gaia' scientist James Lovelock reverses himself: I was 'alarmist' about climate change & so was Gore!
'The problem is we don't know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years
ago'
Contrast
Lovelock's 2012 skeptical climate views with his 2007 beliefs during the height of the man-made climate fear
movement. [ Flashback 2007: Lovelock Predicts Global Warming Doom: 'Billions of us will die; few breeding pairs
of people that survive will be in Arctic' ]
How fitting that a major organ of the man-made climate fear promotion, MSNBC, would
deliver one of the final and most dramatic death knells to the climate movement. One of the founders of climate
alarm bails out with help from the media that helped hype and propel the movement.
More MSNBC article excerpts: Lovelock pointed to Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" and
Tim Flannery's "The Weather Makers" as other examples of "alarmist" forecasts of the future..."The problem is we
don't know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist books -- mine
included -- because it looked clear-cut, but it hasn't happened," Lovelock said. "The climate is doing its usual
tricks. There's nothing much really happening yet. We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now," he
said. "The world has not warmed up very much since the millennium. Twelve years is a reasonable time... it (the
temperature) has stayed almost constant, whereas it should have been rising -- carbon dioxide is rising, no
question about that," he added...Asked if he was now a climate skeptic, Lovelock told msnbc.com: "It depends what
you mean by a skeptic. I'm not a denier." He said human-caused carbon dioxide emissions were driving an increase in
the global temperature, but added that the effect of the oceans was not well enough understood and could have a key
role. "It (the sea) could make all the difference between a hot age and an ice age," he said. 'I made a mistake' As
"an independent and a loner," he said he did not mind saying "All right, I made a mistake." He claimed a university
or government scientist might fear an admission of a mistake would lead to the loss of funding."
Climate Depot began reporting on Lovelock's conversion away from climate fears in
2010 as he began reconsidering the alleged 'settled science." See below for Climate Depot's reporting on the
evolution of James Lovelock's climate views.
Here is an extensive collection of articles debunking global warming and man-made climate change, by experts and
scientists around the world. This collection is worth saving for the next time you are challenged for facts and
authoritative sources.
- TN Editor
The global warming establishment and the media are crowing about 2014 being the hottest
year on record. Marc Morano, founder of ClimateDepot.com, explains how bought-and-paid-for scientists are using
skewed data to help further the UN agenda of one-world government.
Uh oh. Top (former) UN Climate officials (Costa Rican diplomats with no scientific background) are "calculating"
that if we don't stop emitting carbon dioxide by 2020 the earth is doomed! That's right: three years left to save
the planet! Or is that 50 days? 96 months? Or were we doomed 5 years ago? Or was that 17 years ago?...Watch this
video on BitChute / DTube / YouTube
24/7 surveillance. Smart grid controls. Carbon rationing. Today we talk to "Technocracy Rising"
author Patrick Wood about the hidden history of technocracy, the dark plan for a resource-based economy that is
being pushed by the Trilateral Commission, the UN, and other globalist institutions in order to bring about a
completely managed, controlled and regulated society.
Technocracy is a replacement economic system
for Capitalism and Free Enterprise, and is represented by the United Nations’ program for Sustainable Development
and “Green Economy.” It proposes that all means of production and consumption would be controlled by an elite group
of scientists and engineers (technocrats) for the good of mankind. Technocracy was originally architected in the
1930s but regained favor when adopted by the Trilateral Commission in 1973, under their “New International Economic
Order” program. https://www.technocracy.news/faq-2/
The Roots of Technocracy with Expert Patrick M.
Wood
Alex welcomes to the broadcast The August Forecast & Review Editor Patrick M. Wood to discuss
how the global elite within the Trilateral Commission are replacing capitalism with their own technocracy in
order
to create a New International Economic Order. http://www.augustforecast.com/
Click Image
How Technocracy ENSLAVED The World - The REAL Deep
State
(with Patrick Wood)
World Alternative Media
Published on Jul 3, 2017
Josh Sigurdson sits down with author of 'Technocracy Rising' and
researcher Patrick Wood to talk about the most insidious groups of collectivists on
Earth... The technocrats. Patrick breaks down the power wielded by the technocrats
as they've incrementally risen to take over world policy going back to the 1930s.
Wood goes into the very real threat of a global centrally planned cashless society
implemented through the SDR. He also goes into the automation of jobs and who truly
benefits from the raise of minimum wages and guaranteed basic income.
Patrick then breaks down the beginning of the Trilateral
Commission. Of course Patrick co-wrote the book Trilaterals Over Washington in 1979
with writing partner Antony Sutton. From Henry Kissinger's illegal visit with Mao
Zedong to Zbigniew Brzezinski's hijacking of the Carter administration and
subsequent work with China in propping up the society as a technocratic one, the
Trilateral Commission has been right in the middle of all of it. As people commonly
talk about the "deep state", not many seem to know exactly what it is. The answer
is simple. The Trilateral Commission, The Council on Foreign Relations, The United
Nations and the global central banking cartel. Every president for decades, since
its inception have been deeply entrenched in the Trilateral Commission and CFR, if
not members themselves. This goes right up to current day! Trump's administration
is surrounded by Trilateral members and CFR members. This is incredibly important
information to get out to the populace and we at WAM truly hope people share this
around and help in the educational process because the mainstream media isn't going
to do it.
Description:
With meticulous detail and an abundance of original research,
Patrick M. Wood uses Technocracy Rising to connect the dots of modern globalization
in a way that has never been seen before so that the reader can clearly understand
the globalization plan, its perpetrators and its intended endgame.
Technocracy.News for more information and the book can be bought
here:
link
Exposing the Dark Agenda Behind the "Resource-Based
Economy"
24/7 surveillance. Smart grid controls. Carbon rationing. Today we
talk to "Technocracy Rising" author Patrick Wood about the hidden history of
technocracy, the dark plan for a resource-based economy that is being pushed by the
Trilateral Commission, the UN, and other globalist institutions in order to bring
about a completely managed, controlled and regulated society.
"Technocracy in America" by Parag Khanna
trailer
Dr. Parag Khanna
Published on Nov 30, 2016
Technocracy in America...because democracy just isn't good enough.
Available January 10th, 2017.
How The Shadow Banking System Will Create A Global
Currency - BLOCKCHAIN 2016
World Alternative Media
Published on Feb 29, 2016
This is a must watch! Host Josh Sigurdson and author John Sneisen
were joined by derivatives and economic trend expert Stephen Kendal for a
presentation that may just change the way we look at the world. Stephen brought us
groundbreaking information that no one is talking about basically breaking down
step by step how central bankers intend to impose a world currency on the populace
using blockchain derivatives. This analysis has never been done before for the
masses to see and understand.
Stephen Kendal started by explaining derivatives and the different
types of derivatives. From that, he moved on to basic mortgage loans, bundled
loans, S.P.E. (Special Purpose Entity) or S.P.V. (Special Purpose Vehicles),
mortgage backed security (M.B.S.), collateralized debt obligation (C.D.O.), credit
default swap (C.D.S.), other types of derivatives. Stephen then wrapped everything
up by explaining blockchain technology and the future implementation of blockchain
by central bankers.Stephen predicts that we will soon see this implementation as
the economy crashes and central banks capitalize on their lack of accountability.
Basically, the creation of a New World Order as has been pushed for decades by the
highest up elites will emanate itself with blockchain derivatives forever dooming
the world economy.This is historic, but not only that, it's disastrous and
terrifying.If we can all come to understand what's happening right now, we may be
able to stop this.
Share this report on all social medias and let's make sure people are aware of
what's happening!
A big thanks to Stephen Kendal for providing us with this report as
well as sharing his excellent slides with us!
In the heat of the Great Depression during the 1930s, prominent
scientists and engineers proposed a utopian energy-based economic system called
Technocracy that would be run by those same scientists and engineers instead of
elected politicians. Although this radical movement lost momentum by 1940, it
regained status when it was conceptually adopted by the elitist Trilateral
Commission (co-founded by Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller) in 1973 to be
become its so-called “New International Economic Order.”
Patrick Wood: Technocracy Rising Interview (Part 1 of
3)
Tragedy and Hope
Published on Sep 11, 2015
Patrick Wood: Technocracy Rising Interview (Part 2
of 3)
Tragedy and Hope
Published on Sep 11, 2015
Patrick Wood: Technocracy Rising Interview (Part 3 of
3)
Tragedy and Hope
Published on Sep 11, 2015
Author Patrick Wood discusses his recent book
"Technocracy Rising", in a 3-part interview. (Summary of parts, below) http://www.technocracyrising.com/
Patrick Wood is an author and lecturer who has studied elite
globalization policies since the late 1970's, when he partnered with the late
Antony C. Sutton to coauthor Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II. He
remains a leading expert on the elitist Trilateral Commission, their policies and
achievements in creating their self-proclaimed "New International Economic
Order.”
An economist by education, a financial analyst and writer by
profession and an American Constitutionalist by choice, Wood maintains a Biblical
world view and has deep historical insights into the modern attacks on sovereignty,
property rights and personal freedom. Such attacks are epitomized by the
implementation of U.N. policies such as Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, Smart
Growth and in education, the widespread adoption of Common Core.
Wood is a frequent speaker and guest on radio shows around the
nation. His current research builds on Trilateral Commission hegemony, focusing on
Transhumanism, Technocracy and scientism, and how these are co-opting economics,
politics and religion around the world.
Part 1: Energy based Currency, Columbia
University origins of Technocracy, Eugenics, Population Control, and Agenda 21,
origins of Positivism and Scientism;
Part 2: Trilaterals, CFR, Rockefellers, U.N., 1992 Rio
Conference, Agenda 21 and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP);
Part 3: Wood's work with Antony C. Sutton, the Origins of the
Trilateral Commission, Trilaterals and Larry King, and how the Trilateral
Commission influenced the U.S. Govt. since 1973 to present day. Thanks to Ernie
& Donna Hancock at FreedomsPhoenix.com for the use of their studio, and to Rick
Malchow for his assistance in bringing you this interview.
The Common Roots Of Climate Change And COVID-19 Hysteria
Look Into It | Apr 15, 2020
Technocracy News & Trends for Monday, March 30, 2020
People want to know: just how bad is the COVID-19 virus and is fighting it worth the destruction of
the world’s economic and financial system while disrupting the lives of hundreds of millions of people? The story
behind the story will make it clear that things are seldom as they seem.
In short and when seen through the lens of Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy, the whole
world has just been punked and then panicked into destroying itself over COVID-19.
This week marks the one year anniversary of the release of emails and documents from the Climatic Research Unit at
the University of East Anglia that we now know as Climategate.
Sitting here now, one year later, it's becoming difficult to remember the importance of that release of
information, or even what information was actually released. Many were only introduced to the scandal through
commentary in the blogosphere and many more came to know about it only weeks later, after the establishment media
had a chance to assess the damage and fine tune the spin that would help allay their audience's concern that
something important had just happened.
Very few have actually bothered to read the emails and documents for themselves.
...The beginnings of Climategate with the East Anglia CRU email leaks were just the
beginning of a chain reaction of revelations that has fueled anger, doubt, denial and speculation worldwide.
Compromised or fudged data have been identified from research centers in Russia, New Zealand, Australia and beyond.
...It's not only players like Al Gore, the Rothschilds and George Soros who stand to make a killing. President
Barack Obama-- with a great conflict of interest-- was a founding investment partner in the Chicago Climate
Exchange alongside Maurice Strong, a top Rockefeller agent and leading climate change schemer. Chicago Climate
Exchange is written into the architecture of many of the proposals for alternative energy credits, carbon
derivatives and other green financial products and stands to enrich its membership. In the end, the
forced-incrementalism towards total world government, with complete dominance over money, debt, food, engery and resources, paid a price in
exposure at COP15. Many politicians, journalists and people in general are now well aware that a scam has been
forced down upon them-- and both their freedom and sovereignty are certainly at stake.
It's been a decade since the leak of emails from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of
East Anglia exposed the lies, obfuscations and dirty tricks behind the climate change orthodoxy. But although the
conversation has long since moved on, there's still a lot we can learn from the lessons of "Climategate." Joining
us today to reflect on a decade of Climategate lies and where the debate stands today is Marc Morano of
ClimateDepot.com.
AOC, Justice Democrats, New Green Deal zealots and Technocrats everywhere will grind their teeth
over this new research. The scientists concluded, “anthropogenic climate change does not exist in
practice.” TN Editor
A new scientific study could bust wide open deeply flawed fundamental assumptions underlying controversial
climate legislation and initiatives such as the Green New Deal, namely, the degree to which 'climate change' is
driven by natural phenomena vs. man-made issues measured as carbon footprint. Scientists in Finland found
"practically no anthropogenic [man-made]climate change" after a series of
studies.
“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The
human contribution was about 0.01°C”, the Finnish researchers bluntly state in one among a series of papers.
This has been collaborated by a team at Kobe University in Japan, which has furthered the
Finnish researchers' theory: "New evidence suggests that high-energy particles from space known as galactic
cosmic rays affect the Earth's climate by increasing cloud cover, causing an 'umbrella effect'," the just
published study has found, a summary of which has been released in the journal Science Daily. The findings are
hugely significant given this 'umbrella effect' — an entirely natural occurrence
— could be the prime driver of climate warming, and not man-made factors.
Clouds over Los Angeles, via AFP/Getty
The scientists involved in the study are most concerned with the fact that current climate models driving the
political side of debate, most notably the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) climate sensitivity
scale, fail to incorporate this crucial and potentially central variable of increased cloud cover.
"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has discussed the impact of cloud cover on climate in
their evaluations, but this phenomenon has never been considered in climate predictions due to the insufficient
physical understanding of it," comments Professor Hyodo in Science Daily. "This study provides
an opportunity to rethink the impact of clouds on climate. When galactic cosmic rays increase, so do low clouds,
and when cosmic rays decrease clouds do as well, so climate warming may be caused by an opposite-umbrella
effect."
In their related paper, aptly titled, “No experimental evidence for the significant anthropogenic [man-made] climate
change”, the Finnish scientists find that low cloud cover "practically" controls global
temperatures but that “only a small part” of the increased carbon
dioxide concentration is anthropogenic, or caused by human activity.
The following is a key bombshell section in one of the studies conducted by Finland's Turku University team:
We have proven that the GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 cannot compute correctly the natural component
included in the observed global temperature. The reason is that the models fail to derive the influences of low
cloud cover fraction on the global temperature. A too small natural component results in a too large
portion for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. That is why 6 J.
KAUPPINEN AND P. MALMI IPCC represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude larger than our
sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10 %, we have
practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature.
This raises urgent questions and central contradictions regarding current models which politicians and
environmental groups across the globe are using to push radical economic changes on their countries'
populations.
Image source: NASA
Conclusions from both the Japanese and Finnish studies strongly suggest, for example, that Rep. Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez's "drastic measures to cut carbon emissions" which would ultimately require radical
legislation changes to"remake the U.S. economy" would not only potentially
bankrupt everyone but simply wouldn't even work, at least according to the new Finnish research team findings.
To put AOC's "drastic measures" in perspective — based entirely on the fundamental assumption of
the monumental and disastrous impact of human activity on the climate — consider the following
conclusions from the Finnish studies:
“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide.
The human contribution was about 0.01°C.”
Which leads the scientists to state further:
“Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased carbon dioxide is less than 10 percent, we have
practically no anthropogenic climate change,” the researchers concluded.
And the team in Japan has called for a total reevaluation of current climate models, which remain dangerously
flawed for dismissing a crucial
variable:
This study provides an opportunity to rethink the impact of clouds on climate. When
galactic cosmic rays increase, so do low clouds, and when cosmic rays decrease clouds do as well, so climate
warming may be caused by an opposite-umbrella effect. The umbrella effect caused by galactic cosmic
rays is important when thinking about current global warming as well as the warm period of the medieval
era.
Failure to account for this results in the following, according to the one in the series of studies: "The IPCC climate sensitivity is about one order of magnitude
too high, because a strong negative feedback of the clouds is missing in climate models."
Image source: AFP/Getty
"If we pay attention to the fact that only a small part of the increased CO2 concentration is anthropogenic,
we have to recognize that the anthropogenic climate change does not exist in practice,"
the researchers conclude.
Though we doubt the ideologues currently pushing to radically remake the American economy through what ends up
being a $93 trillion proposal (according to one
study) — including AOC's call for a whopping 70% top tax rate — will carefully
inquire of this new bombshell scientific confirmation presented in the new research, we at
least hope the US scientific community takes heed before it's too late in the cause of accurate and authentic
science that would stave off irreparable economic disaster that would no doubt ripple across the globe, adding to
both human and environmental misery.
And "too late" that is, not for some mythical imminent or near-future "global warming
Armageddon" as the currently in vogue highly politicized "science" of activists and congress members alike
claims.
"There’s a good chance you have never heard of them. In less than 30 years,
this American financial firm has grown from nothing to becoming the world’s largest and most
trusted manager of other people’s money. The assets left in their care are worth a staggering
6.3 trillion US dollars – a figure with 12 zeroes." (Investigate Europe - May 10, 2018)
"BlackRock, the international investment management firm run by billionaire
Larry Fink, has played an outsized role in Federal Reserve bailouts of Wall Street. As it turns
out, it’s also been quietly managing hundreds of billions of dollars for more than five million
federal government employees in their retirement plan, known as the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)."
(By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: June 4, 2020 ~ ARTICLE: BlackRock Is Bailing Out Its ETFs
with Fed Money and Taxpayers Eating Losses; It’s Also the Sole Manager for $335 Billion of
Federal Employees’ Retirement Funds.)
Background on Technocracy:
Technocracy is a replacement economic system for Capitalism and Free
Enterprise, and is represented by the United Nations’ program for Sustainable Development and
“Green Economy.” It proposes that all means of production and consumption would be controlled
by an elite group of scientists and engineers (technocrats) for the good of mankind.
Technocracy was originally architected in the 1930s but regained favor when adopted by the
Trilateral Commission in 1973, under their “New International Economic Order”
program.(definition found on Techocracy News https://technocracy.news/)
Links:
1.
New Study Suggests COVID Was Spreading Earlier/Far
Less Deadly & Trump's BlackRock Take Over
Soylent Green Now Actually Being
Promoted
As a Way To Save The Earth
Truthstream Media
First published at 20:50 UTC on September 8th, 2019.
We're at the point now where they're legitimately pitching Soylent Green to everyone
as the "solution" to society's manufactured "problem". Damn I wish George Carlin was here...
Please help support us on Patreon, read our goals here:https://www.patreon.com/truthstreammedia Truthstream Can Be Found Here: Site:http://TruthstreamMedia.com |
Our Film: TheMindsofMen.net|Twitter:
@TruthstreamNews Backup Vimeo:
Vimeo.com/truthstreammedia|DONATE:http://bit.ly/2aTBeeF|Newsletter:http://eepurl.com/bbxcWX
PLEASE DON'T FORGET TO SUB US OVER AT BITCHUTE.COM/TRUTHSTREAM!
we're going to start putting up exclusive content there because of the obvious.
Technocracy News & Trends for Friday, September 20, 2019
Psychological child abuse at the hands of sociopathic adults is as twisted and evil as physical abuse. When kids
are fed propaganda that they are going to die if they don’t strike for global warming, it’s time to say ‘Enough!’
One 15 year old states, “We believe there is no point in going to school if we are not going to have a future to
live in.” These young kids have no ability or tools to understand reality, and are being mercilessly used to
further the global warming hysteria of climate extremists. It is not a mistake that the only solution ever offered
is Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy. Stories covered today Deceived Schoolchildren Take To Streets In
Global Climate Strike Baltimore To Fight Crime By Airplane Surveillance Of Entire City China Invents Handheld Sonic
Weapon For Crowd Control
Alex dissects the
greatest hoax of the century, “man-made global warming,” in this exclusive special report.
Contrary to major media reports, the Arctic & Antarctic ice sheets have seen record growth year after year.
After blatantly lying to the public in the face of hard science, so called “experts” are now calling for a
“crackdown” on climate change skeptics who dare to question the “consensus” that man made global warming is not man
made. Not only do they seek to tax us at every turn in the name of global warming, now too they seek to silence
anyone who disagrees.
In the face of many real environmental threats such as genetic modification which damages our DNA, extreme
over-fishing and toxic waste dumping, the environmental movement has been hijacked in the name of Al Gore carbon
taxes. In fact the single greatest threat to humanity across the ages is despotism and democide, but don’t expect the government to tax itself anytime soon.
This article was posted: Friday, April 4, 2014 at 5:11 pm
Epic Snow — FAIL
Published on Jan 28, 2015
What does the failed prediction of epic snowfall in NY tell us about dire "climate
change"
predictions and the politicians who goad the public into panic?
President McKinley told the
American people that the USS Maine had been sunk in Havana Harbor by a Spanish mine. The American
people, outraged by this apparent unprovoked attack, supported the Spanish American War. The
Captain of the USS Maine had insisted the ship was sunk by a coal bin explosion, investigations
after the war proved that such had indeed been the case. There had been no mine.
In 1928, in the USSR there was a man named Trofim Denisovich Lysenko, a favorite
of Stalin, and ultimately, a con-artist. He was as popular then in the USSR as Al Gore is in
the US today.
Lysenko's prize theory, which suited Stalin's political needs at the time, was
that plants and animals could inherit traits acquired from the environment in a single
generation. That is, if you used cooling to trick Winter wheat seeds to germinate and grow in
the Spring ( a technique already used in the US at the time) the seeds from the chilled
plants would go on germinating in the Spring in perpetuity.
There was very little science in Lysenko's science, but this
"revolution" suited Stalin's desire to outdo the accomplishments in genetics which had occurred
under Lenin. Honor upon honor was heaped on Lysenko (just as is done with Al Gore today) and real
scientists who questioned his theories were shunned, vilified, and removed from their positions
(not unlike the experiences of those modern "heretics" who question the basic beliefs of the global
warming cult). The state media of the USSR proclaimed the virtues of the Lysenko method beyond all
doubt and question, just as the state media of the USA proclaims the "Science is settled" regarding
AGW. But Lysenko had no more real science training than Al Gore, and his theory that the
environment could permanently alter the genetic structure of crops in a single generation was
completely wrong.
However, for political reasons, the USSR mandated that all farmers
had to use the Lysenko method (just as the present government intends to force us all to use the
"Al Gore Cap and Credit" method) and the result was widespread famine when, during the following
spring, the second generation wheat refused to germinate.
This illustrates the problems which can result when the government
thinks it understands science, or that science can be subordinated to political agenda.
FDR claimed Pearl Harbor was
a surprise attack. It wasn't. The United States saw war with Japan as the means to get
into war with Germany, which Americans opposed. So Roosevelt needed Japan to appear to strike
first. Following an 8-step plan devised by the Office of Naval
Intelligence, Roosevelt intentionally provoked Japan into the attack. Contrary to the
official story, the Japanese fleet did not maintain radio silence, but sent messages intercepted and
decoded by US intercept stations. Tricked by the lie
of a surprise attack, Americans marched off to war.
President Johnson lied
about the Gulf of Tonkin to send Americans off to
fight in Vietnam.
There were no torpedoes in the water in the Gulf. LBJ took advantage of an
inexperienced sonar man's erroneous report of an attack to goad Congress into escalating the
Vietnam War.
Then there were the lies used to trick the US into war with
Iraq.
First off was Tony Blair's "Dodgy
Dossier", a document released by the Prime Minister that
made many of the claims used to support the push for war. The dossier soon collapsed when it was
revealed that much of it had been plagiarized from a student thesis paper that was 12 years
old!
The contents of the dossier, however much they seemed to create a good case
for invasion, were obsolete and outdated.
Then there was the claim
about the "Mobile biological weapons laboratories". Proffered in the absence of any real
laboratories in the wake of the invasion, photos of these trailers were shown on all the US
Mainstream Media, with the claim they while seeming to lack anything suggesting biological
processing, these were part of a much larger assembly of multiple trailers that churned out
biological weapons of mass destruction.
This claim fell apart when it was revealed that these trailers were nothing
more than hydrogen gas generators used to inflate weather balloons. This fact was already
known to both the US and UK, as a British company manufactured the units and sold them to
Iraq.
Colin Powell's speech to the UN was itself one misstatement after another.
Powell claimed that Iraq had purchased special aluminum tubes whose only possible use was in
uranium enrichment centrifuges. Both CIA and Powell's own State Department confirmed that the
tubes were parts for missiles Saddam was legally allowed to have. Following the invasion, no
centrifuges, aluminum or otherwise were found.
Powell also claimed to the
United Nations that the photo on the left showed "Decontamination Vehicles". But when United
Nations inspectors visited the site after the invasion, they located the vehicles and
discovered they were just firefighting equipment.
Powell claimed the Iraqis had illegal rockets and launchers hidden in the palm
trees of Western Iraq. None were ever found.
Powell claimed that the Iraqis had 8,500 liters (2245 gallons) of Anthrax.
None was ever found.
Powell claimed that Iraq had four tons of VX nerve gas. The UN had already
confirmed that it was destroyed. The only VX ever found were samples the US had left as
"standards" for testing. When the UN suspected that the US samples had been used to contaminate
Iraqi warheads, the US moved quickly to destroy the samples before
comparison tests could be carried out.
Powell claimed that Iraq was building long-range remote drones specifically
designed to carry biological weapons. The only drones found were short-range reconnaissance
drones.
Powell claimed that Iraq had an aggregate of between 100 and 500 tons of
chemical and biological warfare agents. Powell gave no basis for that claim at all, and a DIA
report issued the same time directly contradicted the claim. No biological or chemical
weapons were found in Iraq following the invasion.
Powell claimed that "unnamed sources" confirmed that Saddam had authorized his
field commanders to use biological weapons. No such weapons were ever used by the Iraqis to
defend against the invasion and, of course, none were ever found in Iraq.
Powell claimed that 122mm warheads found by the UN inspectors were chemical
weapons. The warheads were empty, and showed no signs of ever having contained chemical
weapons.
Powell claimed that Iraq had a secret force of illegal long-range Scud
missiles. None were ever found.
Colin Powell's UN debacle also included spy photos taken from high flying
aircraft and spacecraft. On the photos were circles and arrows and labels pointing to various
fuzzy white blobs and identifying them as laboratories and storage areas for Saddam's massive
weapons of mass destruction program. Nothing in the photos actually suggested what the blobby
shapes were and during inspections which followed the invasion, all of them turned out to be
rather benign.
In at least one case, the satellite Powell claimed had taken one of the
pictures had actually been out of operation at the time. And
many questioned why Powell was showing black and white photos when the satellites in use at the
time over Iraq took color images.
Another piece of evidence
consists of documents which President Bush referenced as in his 2003 State of the Union Speech.
According to Bush, these documents proved that Iraq was buying tons of uranium oxide, called
"Yellow Cake" from Niger.
Since Israel had bombed Iraq's nuclear power plant years before, it was
claimed that the only reason Saddam would have for buying uranium oxide was to build
bombs.
This hoax fell apart fast when it was pointed out that Iraq has a great deal of
uranium ore inside their own borders and no need to import any from Niger or anywhere else. The
I.A.E.A. then blew the cover off the fraud by announcing that the documents Bush had used were
not only forgeries, but too obvious to believe that anyone in the Bush
administration did not know they were forgeries! The forged documents were reported as being
"discovered" in Italy by SISMI, the Italian Security Service. Shortly before the "discovery"
the head of SISMI had been paid a visit by Michael Ledeen, Manucher Ghorbanifar, and two
officials from OSP, one of whom was Larry Franklin, the Israeli spy operating inside the
OSP.
In July, 2005, the Italian Parliament concluded their own investigation and
named four men as suspects in the creation of the forged documents. Michael Ledeen, Dewey
Clarridge, Ahmed Chalabi and Francis Brookes. This report has been included in Patrick
Fitzgerald's investigation into the outing of Valerie Plame, and Paul McNulty, the prosecutor
of the AIPAC spy case.
A recently declassified memo proves that the State Department reported the
fact that the Niger documents were forgeries to the CIA 11 days before President Bush made the claim about the Niger uranium
based on those documents.
In the end, the real proof that we were lied to about Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction is that no weapons of mass destruction were ever found. That means that every
single piece of paper that purported to prove that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction was
by default a fraud, a hoax, and a lie. There could be no evidence that supported the claim
that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction because Iraq did not have weapons of mass
destruction. In a way, the existence of any faked documents about Iraq's WMDs is actually an
admission of guilt. If one is taking the time to create fake documents, the implication is
that the faker is already aware that there are no genuine documents.
What the US Government had, ALL that they had, were copied student papers,
forged "Yellow Cake" documents, balloon inflators posing as bioweapons labs, and photos with
misleading labels on them. And somewhere along the line, someone decided to put those
misleading labels on those photos, to pretend that balloon inflators are portable bioweapons
labs, and to pass off stolen student papers as contemporary analysis.
The President of the United States and his Neocon associates lied to the
people of the United States to send them off on a war of conquest.
"News
is what someone wants to suppress. Everything else is advertising". -- Former NBC news President Rubin Frank
But in the modern age, where fewer and fewer people are blindly religious,
doomsayers have had to eschew the trappings of the religious prophet and don the garb of the scientific
prognosticator. However, their track record of success in predicting the end of the world had fared no better than
that of their clerical brethren!
The Killer Bees
One of the
fastest ways to get attention and funding is to announce the imminent doom of the world, then ask for money and/or
obedience to study and perhaps "solve" the problem.
In the 1970s, alarmists warned that a deadly strain of African Killer Bees,
accidentally released in Brazil in 1957, were slowly moving towards the United States. The
media was filled with lurid stories of vengeance-minded bees slaughtering innocent humans.
Movies and TV were filled with killer bee horror films (or comedic skits such as the Killer
Bees on Saturday Night Live).
Starting in 2002, the Killer Bees did in fact arrive in the United
States. And contrary to the warnings, they do not attack people at random. Like any other bee, they will act to
defend their hives when attacked, but since most Americans are smart enough not to do that with ordinary bees, the
prophecies of doom and death never materialized.
As a side note, Apiculturists already knew that the Killer Bee alarm
was overblown. Worker bees, killer or otherwise, can only sting once, and usually die afterwards. Only the Queen
Bees, which never leave the hive after their mating flight, are able to sting multiple times and survive. So bees,
killer or otherwise, do not sting unless they are provoked to the point of a Kamikaze suicide attack on the
enemy.
Y2K
As the 20th
century wound down, concern was raised over the fact that most calendar functions inside computers were "hardwired"
with the leading "19", and that as of midnight, December 31, 1999, computer date functions would leap backwards one
hundred years to Jan 1, 1900.
The media was filled with dire forecasts of passenger jets falling out
of the skies, banks unable to operate, a stock market crash, power grid collapse, etc. etc. etc. etc.
Now, while it was true that some dedicated clock and calendar chips did
in fact have the hardwired "19" problem, the reality is that most calendar functions were already being handled
totally in software and for those that were not, a changeover to software calendars able to deal with the year 2000
was a trivial exercise.
But so convincing were the scaremongers that the public started pulling
their money out of banks in anticipation of a crash. As a result, corporations had to spend far more money on
demonstrations to convince the public that Y2K was fixed than they spent fixing Y2K. In the end, Y2K turned into a
6 billion dollar enterprise that reaped huge profits for the scaremongerers-turned-software patch and "assurance
testing" entrepreneurs.
"It will without doubt have come to your Lordship's knowledge that a
considerable change of climate, inexplicable at present to us, must have taken place in the Circumpolar
Regions, by which the severity of the cold that has for centuries past enclosed the seas in the high northern
latitudes in an impenetrable barrier of ice has been during the last two years, greatly
abated.
(This) affords ample proof that new sources of warmth have been opened and
give us leave to hope that the Arctic Seas may at this time be more accessible than they have been for
centuries past, and that discoveries may now be made in them not only interesting to the advancement of science
but also to the future intercourse of mankind and the commerce of distant nations." President of the Royal
Society, London, to the Admiralty, 20th November, 1817
Global Warming in 1922
"The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some
places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from
Consul Ifft, at Bergen , Norway . Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers, he declared, all point to
a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration
expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met with as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to
a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm. Great masses of ice have been replaced by
moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely
disappeared. Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and
smelts, which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing
grounds." -- AP as published in the Washington Post,
November 2, 1922
The Coming Ice Age (1975)
As strange as it may
seem, back in the 1970s, NEWSWEEK reported that climatologists were warning that Earth was
headed into a new Ice age.
That prophecy didn't work out either.
In 1977 TIME also reported that climatologists were warning
that
Earth was headed into a new Ice age.
But all the way back in
1922, Global Warming was the fashion!
...And again
in 1958, Global Warming was the fashion!
If there is a
lesson to be learned from all of the above, it is that governments, religious leaders, TV Networks; con men of all
persuasions, are constantly warning you of something you really ought to be afraid of, or are possibly the cause
of, and in any event are able to avoid/atone for with enough cold hard cash.
What is Global Warming?
Let's get
something straight; the climate is supposed to change. In 4 1/2 billion years, there has never been a time when the
Earth's climate remained exactly the same. Careful study of the geological and paleontological record shows that
the climate is always changing; that the Earth is always getting warmer or colder in long hundred thousand year
cycles.
At present the earth is far colder than the Cretaceous but far warmer than the ice
ages. Given that the Earth has only recently come out of the Little Ice Age, it stands to reason
weshould be getting
warmer. It is this idea that the Earth can or should be locked into a particular configuration that is artificial
and unnatural. And who was to decide what the ideal temperature of earth should be? What is ideal for people living
at the equator is hardly ideal for people living in the polar regions.
Global warming cultists like to talk about the balance of nature. This is a very
romantic term, and sounds worthy of preservation. But there is no balance of nature. Nature is change. Nature is
chaos. Nature is one life form going extinct while another evolves into being. Nature has never been in balance; it
is in fact careening through time colliding with the landscape.
Is there really a crisis? Would it really be a bad thing if the Earth were getting
warmer?
Warmer temperatures mean longer growing seasons. Longer growing seasons mean more
food. And at a time when much of the world's population are going hungry, more food is a good thing.
Is carbon dioxide really such a bad
thing? Carbon dioxide occurs naturally. The major sources are
volcanoes and respiration from animal life on Earth. As carbon dioxide increases plant life which uses carbon
dioxide for photosynthesis will grow more abundantly. Again, producing more food. There are even companies
which will install carbon dioxide enhancement systems for commercial greenhouses because it has been proven
that increased carbon dioxide stimulates plant growth and larger crops.
Is carbon dioxide a greenhouse gas? Yes, it is. But it is not the only one. Water
vapor is by far the most abundant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Methane is also a greenhouse gas, more potent
than carbon dioxide. But you cannot tax water vapor, and methane is produced by termites and deep-sea microbes,
which are far too intelligent life forms to submit to carbon taxes, so the global warming cultists have settled on
carbon dioxide as the villain because a portion of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere can be traced to human
activity.
How much atmospheric carbon dioxide comes from human activity? Not including
respiration, human contribution to atmospheric carbon dioxide is .28% of the total atmospheric carbon
dioxide.
A closer look at the numbers
Now this may not seem like
very much, and indeed it isn't. With volcanoes producing far more carbon dioxide than humans, one wonders what all
the fuss is about regarding our cars and industry. But the global warming cult has a handy explanation. The global
warming cult likes to claim that natural sources of carbon dioxide are already balanced out by natural sinks for
carbon dioxide. Volcanoes are offset by trees. The carbon dioxide emitted by sea life is absorbed by seaweed. By
claiming that there is no natural counterpart to human caused carbon dioxide the global warming cult tries to claim
that .28% of atmospheric carbon dioxide contributed by human activity is upsetting the balance of nature. But as we
pointed out before, there is no balance of nature. It is a romantic notion, but simply not reality. Experiments
with enhanced CO2 in greenhouses confirms that as CO2 levels rise, plants will grow larger, absorb more CO2,
driving levels back down again.
The Global Warming Fraud
So how do we know we are
dealing with a fraud? As noted above, climate change is something that is supposed to happen. The world is always
getting warmer or colder. The promotion of a change in the climate as a threat to humankind requiring the paying of
taxes and submission to authority is a manufactured construct.
How do we know an agenda is involved? Simple. If the global warming alarmists were
really only interested in the welfare of the Earth, one would expect them to be delirious with joy that the threat
of anthropogenic global warming doesn't really exist after all. But quite to the contrary, those whose paychecks
are dependent on the global warming industry are in a total panic to reassure us that, yes, there is a real danger,
and it is all our fault!
Another reason we know Anthropocentric Global Warming is a hoax is that Scientific
Method is supposed to allow for others to double-check the work leading to the theory. In other words, starting
with the same data and applying the same methods, I should get the same results. But in the case of Anthropocentric
Global Warming, this is impossible. The CRU, in response to Freedom of Information Requests for the raw data on
which they based their dire predictions of doom, first stalled, thenadmitted they had destroyed the raw
data! We mere mortals are expected to simply take their word
their conclusions are accurate. I have to wonder with all the tens of millions of dollars in funding CRU
enjoyed, why they could not purchase an extra hard drive to save that raw data!
In ancient times rulers ruled by what ever lie would convince the people that they
needed to be ruled. One very common dodge was rule by divine right. I am your ruler because God said so. But as
mankind has evolved and become more sophisticated, and understands that the idea of God is more a metaphor than
reality, rulers intent on using deception to rule their people have had to come up with more convincing myths. Obey
me and I will save you from the Communists. Obey me and I'll save you from the terrorists. Obey me and I will save
you from global warming. And so forth...
So the push to sell global government on the basis of human caused global warming
is just another variation on the theme of I am the ruler because the gods hath decreed it so.
Maybe it's time for humans to evolve past this latest deception.
As for the actual evidence calling into question the claims of human caused global
warming, we can start with the very small percentage of atmospheric carbon dioxide actually created by human
industry. The attempt by the global warming cult to claim that natural carbon dioxide is not a problem because
nature balances it out, but human caused carbon dioxide is a threat, betrays the agenda of of taking something that
occurs naturally and focusing the blame for it onto humans in order to guilt them out of money and
obedience.
The major problem that the
global warming cultists have faced is that the Earth has actually been cooling for almost 12 years now. The global
warming cultists attempted to re-brand by avoiding the term global warming and saying their agenda was to deal with
climate change. Not just any climate change of course but sudden climate change, again the fault of humans, again
requiring taxes and obedience to a global authority to solve. But re-branding as the climate change cult did not
secure the fact that the predictions for a warming globe were simply not panning out. It was at this point that
institutions dependent on funding to study human caused global warming began to adjust their data in order to, as
CRU put it, "conceal the decline". Otherwise, trust in the climate scientist was going to be undermined by the fact
that they had obviously totally blown which way the temperatures of earth were going, predicting that they were
going up when in fact they were demonstrably in decline.
IPCC predictions in yellow/orange, real world in
blue/green
Blue line is the raw data. The red line is the "value added" data the IPCC is
using.
"This is from an Australian at BMRC (not Neville Nicholls). It
began from the attached article. What an idiot. The scientific community would come down on me in no uncertain
terms if I said the world had cooled from 1998. OK it has but it is only 7 years of
data..."
Clearly from the above Dr. Phil Jones is well aware that the Earth has been
cooling for 7 (now 11) years and is clearly biased against allowing that information to be made public. Ultimately,
Phil Jones did admit on the record thatthere has been no warming since 1995.
As I mentioned in
the previous section, politicians seek to gain wealth and power and authority by taking something that occurs
naturally, transforming it and promoting it as a crisis, and then selling the population a solution in exchange for
higher taxes and increased authority over their lives.
Al Gore and his investors have created a crisis called human caused global
warming. They have created a product, literally out of thin air, called the carbon credit. This is essentially a
license to pollute. And as experience in Europe has already shown, polluters will simply buy the license, and pass
the cost on to consumers. The pollution will continue, has continued; the only real change is that goods and
services cost more than they did before.
These so-called carbon credits will be bought from those who have too many, and
resold to those who need more. This will require a brokerage, of which the only one currently in existence is owned
by Al Gore and his investors, who stand to make billions of dollars from the trading of carbon credits. This is not
unlike the manner in which Enron made billions of dollars off of the people of California by trading imbalances in
electricity. It is not a coincidence that Enron's Ken Lay assisted Al Gore in setting up the structure for the
trading of carbon credits. Al Gore is doing with carbon dioxide to the world what Ken lay did to California with
electricity.
There is a huge amount of money at stake on convincing the people of the world
that the Earth is getting warmer, that it is all their fault, and atonement lies with submitting to new
taxation.
Those people still supporting AGW (anthropogenic global warming) are
dependent on funding to support their current positions. That funding is in turn dependent in the continuation of
faith that AGW (anthropogenic global warming) is correct. After all, when Galileo proved that the Earth Orbited the
Sun, funding for continued research into epicycles vanished abruptly, along with tenures and the value of every
degree issued in the field of Epicycles.
The same applies here. With precious rare exception, every academic whose degree
and funding is based on AGW is looking at a stark unemployment picture. In their minds, they are not fighting for
scientific truth; they are fighting for their livelihood, and the proof is very simple. If their primary concern
was really the long term welfare of planet Earth, one would think the Global Warming Cult would be delighted to
find out there really is no danger after all. But, as is clearly evident, the goal is to support the orthodoxy even
against the revelation that their core scientific foundation is based on a fraud.
Quite a few people, including President Obama, are financially invested in the
Global Carbon Credit scheme, in which licenses are issued to pollute, with the surplus units bought and sold
through brokerages. Al Gore and his fellow investors have already spent $150 million to "sell" anthropogenic global
warming. They will not walk away from that investment easily.
Beyond the researchers whose degrees and funding are dependent on the continuation
of a perceived public threat, the media outlets and government officials who signed onto this campaign are now
realizing that they have wagered their entire credibility on AGW (anthropogenic global warming) at a time when
their credibility was already strained from Saddam's "nookular" bombs, the economy, 9-11, etc. etc. etc.
Climategate could well be the final nail in the coffin of the public's trust of corporate media and
government.
Over and above the financial incentive, there is another agenda at
work. There has been a push forward for the emergence of a global government for many years now. The plan to sell
this new global oligarchy to the people the world rests on three pillars. The first pillar is human caused global
warming, requiring submission to a global environmental authority. The second pillar was the global swine flu
pandemic, requiring submission to a global health authority. The third pillar was the global financial crisis,
requiring submission to a global banking authority. All three pillars are in serious trouble. If the pillar of
human caused global warming collapses, no doubt it will pull the other two down with it.
Clearly there's a tremendous amount of political and financial power behind the
selling of anthropogenic global warming to the people of the world. It is this political power which was able to
provide Al Gore with an Academy award for his documentary film "An Inconvenient Truth" even though that film has
already been exposed as containing multiple factual errors. It was this same political power which obtained for Al
Gore a Nobel peace prize again for his documentary film and again awarded even though the
deceptionshad been exposed in a British court of law.
So much money and political power has been invested in the myth of human caused
global warming that if human caused global warming becomes exposed to the general population as a lie and a hoax,
many well-known institutions of government and media will likely collapse from the scandal. The establishment is
literally fighting for its life. And we should expect them to take any and all desperation measures to prolong and
preserve their power and prestige and privilege.
This is a Street Brawl for Truth and Freedom
It is clear that government,
the media, corporatized science, have quite literally bet the farm on selling the illusion of human caused global
warming as justification for global taxes and global government. In order to bring about global government
simultaneous with creating the illusion of a need they have to destroy the credibility of the regional governments
and we have seen a great deal of this lately. Now the oligarchs face an awkward choice. They have set the stage for
a collapse of the national governments, but the global government they wish to install in its place may be
collapsing right along with the myth of global warning.
Various governments and the media are so heavily invested in selling the illusion
of human caused global warming, that if that hoax is exposed, if the public becomes aware of the monstrous fraud
involved, those institutions of government and media could very well be destroyed and by their own
hands.
Already we are seeing the organizers and perpetrators of this fraud trying to
limit the damage from this exposure in several ways. The media is already hard at work attempting to dump the blame
and scandal solely on the climate scientists, who after all were only doing what they were paid to do. This is not
to say the scientists are not guilty. Quite the contrary, they deserve to be pilloried publicly and humiliated for
their betrayal of the public trust. To say that their careers should be ended is an understatement. But in our
haste to punish the scientists who assisted in the lies to the world, we must not forget that the scientists were
working for somebody; for politicians such as Al Gore, for an agenda called global government, and for those who
wanted to get rich by selling a fictitious product called carbon credit.
Yet another tactic being employed to limit the damage from climate gate, is to
insist that even though the scientist responsible for the climate warming data have been exposed as holsters that
the validity of the data itself must remain above question above reproach. This of course is nonsense. If you hire
a contractor to build a home, and discover afterwards that the contractor has a history of using substandard
materials and sloppy workmanship, do you continue to believe the home he has built you is solid and durable and
safe? Of course not. And yet the global warming cultists are demanding exactly this kind of naïveté from the public
at large.
The latest spin is that if one questions the dogma of Anthropocentric Global
Warming, then one must be in favor of destroying the Earth. There is no middle ground. Another common propaganda
tactic is to accuse those who question the veracity of the Global Warming Cultists is to accuse them of receiving
paychecks from oil companies. When one points out that the proponents of Anthropocentric Global Warming are being
paid for their work, one gets a "hurrumph" of indignation. It's apparently acceptable for their side of the
argument to be well-funded, because in their eyes they are the "good guys." Finally, there is the much-ballyhooed
"Precautionary Principle" which states that one should never take any action that might cause harm even if that
potential harm cannot be demonstrated or proven. In theory such a prohibition should extend to any actions
undertaken in support of the Precautionary Principle itself, but such suggestions get the usual "Hurrumph" of
indignation. The cultists are really good at that.
So is climate gate a fraud? Is climate gate a scientific scandal? No. Climate gate
is first and foremost a political scandal. More than that it is a global political scandal that involves
governments, media, institutionalize science, the banks, universities, indeed a vast cross-section of our ruling
classes. It is more than a scandal; climate gate is a crime against humanity. And this is not an exaggeration. The
goal of climategate was to extract money from every human being on planet Earth in exchange for a nonexistent
salvation from a nonexistent threat. The goal of climate gate was to trick every human being on planet Earth into
accepting the yoke of a global oligarchy with no more legitimate claim to power than those who ruled by divine
right.
We are at a watershed moment. We may well see a transition to a new and better
political structure for the entire world. But it will not be the one that has been designed for us. If nothing
else, the ability for government and media to lie to the population of the world on such a vast scale is forever
destroyed. Climategate will relegate all of the official stories of the governments of the United States and Great
Britain and indeed every government that took part in the human caused global warming hoax to the same level of
credibility as Ramses carvings showing his victory over the Hittites. It will be seen as an historic joke by future
generations.
But we are not there yet. The forces that have enslaved us with deception and
fraud and hoax are desperate to hang onto their power and authority. They are busy coming up with new hoaxes and
frauds to scare us back into obedience. And the media well aware that they cannot report on the lies of climate
gate without reporting their own complicity are working hand in glove with government to reassert their ability to
control what you think and when you think it.
So, what we, the free people of planet Earth, need to do in the coming weeks is
become the new mainstream media. The TV networks and other corporate media have been handed their marching orders
to resell the illusion of human caused climate change in any way shape or form that will convince you to accept new
taxes and the loss of your freedoms. The only way the rest of the world is going to find out about climate gate is
if you tell them. Because the TV and news magazines won't. If it's mentioned at all, it will be to trivialize and
dismiss it and assure the world it really doesn't matter. BBC is still reporting climate gate as just another
computer crime. This is like reporting Watergate as just another burglary!
We have collected together a vast body of evidence calling into question the
legitimacy of the claims of human caused global warming. We have collected together a vast body of evidence proving
fraud and deception on the part of the global warming cult. Please forward this information to everybody you know.
Time is of the essence. Barack Obama as already indicated that he will not be swayed by the exposure of the fraud
in the CRU/NWIA data, and fully intends to go to Copenhagen to sign away our national sovereignty as "penance" for
our contribution to global warming.
Other observers have commented that the moment president Obama signs that
Copenhagen Treaty his credibility as president of the United States will be destroyed. For him to sign away
sovereignty of our nation on the basis of a known lie should enrage all Americans and make it clear that the
federal government is not working in the interests of the American people any more, but in service to this emerging
globalist socialistic empire. Remember; global government is what Hitler wanted. Global Government is what Napoleon
wanted. Global Government is what Alexander the Great wanted. Global Government is what the Roman Caesars
wanted.
Climategate may well prove to be the final fight in the war between those who
would rule us with lies and those who wish to live with truth. Climategate makes it clear that yes, there really
are massive conspiracies between government and the media to mislead the general public. You cannot pretend they
don't exist; one is right there before you staked out naked on the ground, exposed for all to marvel at! I leave it
as an exercise for the reader to decide how many other such deceptions form what we think we know of the world and
of history.
There are two paths into the future. Along one lies freedom and truth and
prosperity for the people. Along the other lies a socialist dictatorship, born in deception, unable and unwilling
to tolerate dissent, and dedicated to robbing the poor to give to the rich.
You need to decide which future you wish to live
in. And you need to decide what you will do about it.
THE GREAT
GLOBAL WARMING SWINDLE
Al Gore's Top 10 Idiotic Quotes
Al Gore claims to have
created the internet. (50 seconds into the video)
Al Gore posed for a photo paddling a canoe. But in order to make
sure the canoe would float for the photo-op, 4 billion gallons of water was released from a New Hampshire dam and
allowed to escape down the creek.
New Hampshire was in the middle of a record drought at the time.
The academic at the centre of the ‘Climategate’ affair, whose raw data is
crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble ‘keeping track’ of the
information.
Colleagues say that the reason Professor Phil Jones has refused Freedom of
Information requests is that he may have actually lost the relevant papers.
Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of
colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his
record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be’.
The data is crucial to the famous ‘hockey stick graph’ used by climate change
advocates to support the theory.
Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in
medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.
And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically
significant’ warming.
‘NOAA-16’ was launched in September 2000, and is currently operational, in a
sun-synchronous orbit, 849 km above the Earth, orbiting every 102 minutes providing automated data feed of
surface temperatures which are fed into climate computer models.
NOAA has reported a succession of record warm temperatures in recent years
based on such satellite readings but these may now all be undermined.
World-renowned Canadian climatologist, Dr. Timothy Ball, after casting his
expert eye over the shocking findings concluded, “At best the entire incident indicates gross incompetence, at
worst it indicates adeliberate attempt to create a temperature
record that suits the political message of the day.”
Chart of Earth's Temperature
When we open up the scale of a chart of Earth's Temperatureto a much longer period of history, we see
that there is nothing at all abnormal about the current climate. We are warmer than the ice ages (one of
which we just came out of) but colder than the Cretaceous. And ignoring the effects of the Chixulub
Asteroid Impact, life on Earth seems to have survived quite well at far warmer temperatures than we have
now.
Alex invites expert weather forecaster Piers Corbin, the owner of WeatherAction.com, to analyze the causes of
extreme winter weather conditions seen throughout the U.S., and to discuss how the "global warming" agenda,
or "climate change" as it's increasingly being referenced, is losing steam. http://www.weatheraction.com/pages/pv...
Is "democracy" just a carefully managed con game? Professor Quigley not only spent
decades researching and writing about those who secretly control the machinery of our “representative
governments,” he was permitted to examine their secret papers. He was invited in, but he ultimately
betrayed their trust when he exposed their plans and their methods.
- Joe Plummer -
G. Edward Griffin The Quigley Formula
Bill Clinton And More From The Archives!
Jason Bermas
Premiered Aug 20, 2019
G. Edward Griffin The Quigley Formula Bill Clinton And More From The Archives!
Another great speaker who lays out a compelling narrative of history in the archived
series!