According toNBC DFW, “The lawsuit further alleges that [trooper Kelley]
Helleson performed searches on both women, touching both their anus and vaginas, without changing the latex
gloves between searches.”
Footage of the incident was caught by one of the trooper’s dash-cams and shows in
horrific detail how the two women, Angel Dobbs, 38, and her niece, Ashley Dobbs, 24, were made to submit to
invasive grope-downs in full view of passing motorists.
Two Texas women have filed a federal suit against two
state troopers and their department head after being forced to undergo a humiliating “roadside body cavity search”
during a routine traffic stop in July.
According to NBC DFW, “The lawsuit further alleges that [trooper Kelley] Helleson performed searches on
both women, touching both their anus and vaginas, without changing the latex gloves between searches.”
Footage of the incident was caught by one of the trooper’s dash-cams and shows in horrific detail how the two
women, Angel Dobbs, 38, and her niece, Ashley Dobbs, 24, were made to submit to invasive grope-downs in full view
of passing motorists.
The stop begins, innocently enough, with trooper David Farrell pulling the two ladies over for allegedly
throwing cigarette butts out of their windows, which they denied.
Afterwards, the state trooper, is heard radioing a female officer requesting her assistance with a search he
intended to perform.
The officer returns to their car and, out of nowhere, asks the two women, “How much marijuana is in that car?
And don’t lie to me,” to which a woman replies, “I don’t smoke marijuana.” The initial exchange was transcribed by
NBC:
Farrell: How much marijuana is in that car? And don’t lie to me. Angel Dobbs: I don’t smoke marijuana. Farrell: OK, how much marijuana is in that car? That’s my question. Dobbs: I swear to God, I don’t smoke marijuana. Farrell: I’m not asking you if you smoke it. Dobbs: I don’t think there is any marijuana in that car. Farrell: OK, when was the last time somebody smoked marijuana in that car? Dobbs: I honestly don’t know. It’s my boyfriend’s car. So, I just borrowed it. Farrell: There’s an odor of marijuana coming from the car and that’s why I’ve got to talk to
you further about it. Um, and the more upfront you are the better it’s going to go for you. So, you’re telling me
there’s no marijuana in that car? Dobbs: To the best of my knowledge, no there is not. Farrell: Is there anything hidden on your person? Dobbs: On my person? Farrell: On your person, in your shoes, in your underwear? Dobbs: No. I feel like I’m being treated like a criminal right
now. What’s going on? Farrell: I’ve got a female Trooper up the road, she’s going to come down here and we’re just
going to check a little bit more.
When the female officer arrives, Farrell relays that the women “are both acting real weird” and singles out the
driver, Angel, as needing the search, saying, “There may be a dimesack in there or something, but I’m still gonna
search it.”
Next, the female trooper, Kelley Helleson, is seen putting the all-too familiar blue gloves on before descending
down the pants of the two accused drug smugglers, while Farrell searches their car.
The illegal searches failed to produce any marijuana, but that didn’t stop Farrell from performing a field
sobriety test, which Dobbs passed.
The searches subsequently left a painful reminder of the incident. “Angel Dobbs said Helleson irritated an anal
cyst she suffers from during the search, causing her ‘severe and continuing pain and discomfort,’” reported the
Daily Mail.
According to the Dallas Morning News, the lawsuit alleges “Angel Dobbs was overwhelmed with emotion and a
feeling of helplessness and reacted stating that Helleson had just violated her in a most horrific manner.”
“The suit also says Helleson failed to properly explain the extent of the search, telling Angel Dobbs, 38, ‘not
to worry about’ why she was putting on blue latex gloves,” according to Austin’s KVUE News.
The lawsuit apparently also stops just short of accusing Farrell of being a thief: “The lawsuit goes on to say
that a bottle of prescribed Hydrocodone was missing from Dobbs’ car and purse after the search. The women returned
to the scene of the traffic stop the next day to search for the medication, but it was nowhere to be found.”
Steven McCraw, the director of the Department of Public Safety, is also named in the lawsuit for failing to
address a “long standing pattern of police misconduct involving unlawful strip searches, cavity searches and the
like…”
One of the women’s attorneys, Charles Soechting, Jr., says the troopers “failed the citizens of Texas,” and that
a Class C Misdemeanor “does not justify any type of pat down, let alone an invasive search of cavities of
women.”
The Dallas County District Attorney’s Office, in addition to a grand jury hearing in January, has also forwarded
the case to their public integrity division, which investigates public servants who commit crimes under the
“characterization” of their job.
Texas DPS did not immediately respond to Infowars’ media request at the time of publishing.
Outrage Over Highway Body
Cavity Search - Video
Outrage Over Highway Body Cavity Search -
Video
July 04, 2013 - Two women dressed in bikinis say police officers forced a body
cavity search on them during a highway traffic stop.
DPS reinstates trooper who conducted
controversial body cavity search gets her job back
DPS director plans to “re-familiarize” his officers
with the department’s policy on roadside cavity and strip searches
Julie Wilson Infowars.com
August 12, 2013
Afemale Texas Department of Transportation (DPS) trooper
who performed a roadside body cavity search on two females has been reinstated with the force on Friday, reports
KTRK-TV.
DPS Director Steve McCraw has decided to rehire rookie Trooper Jennie Bui who was placed on suspension, after a
grand jury failed to indict her on any wrongdoings.
McCraw says Bui was simply following the orders of a more senior officer, and therefore should not be
terminated.
A July Infowars report described the humiliation two young women endured when they were
stopped for speeding by Troopers Nathaniel Turner and Jenny Bui on Memorial Day last year.
Turner ignored one of the women’s requests to cover herself up (since she was wearing only a bathing suit), and
also answered one of the women’s cell phones during the stop.
Turner said he smelled marijuana coming from the vehicle and called Bui for assistance.
Once on the scene, Bui performed embarrassing body cavity searches in plain view on both women along a Houston
highway.
Even more disturbingly, Bui did not change her gloves in between searches.
“It was determined that the relatively inexperienced trooper was directed by a more senior trooper to conduct
the inappropriate search,” said McCraw.
McCraw also said, “While the actions of Trooper Bui constitute misconduct, I believe her actions are mitigated
such that she should not be terminated from the agency.”
Bui will be suspended without pay for 60 days, placed on six months disciplinary probation and receive
additional training on search and seizure procedures, reports KVUE.
McCraw claims he is making an effort to “re-familiarize” his officers with the department’s policy on roadside
cavity and strip searches.
As for Turner, McCraw calls his conduct “unacceptable” and a blatant violation of DPS policy.
Following the results of an internal investigation, Turner was terminated.
McCraw insists that “DPS holds it employees to the highest standards,” and the department continue to “take
immediate action in any instance of misconduct” to ensure its employees are held accountable.
The two women filed a federal lawsuit against DPS and are currently in litigation. They are expected to make an
appearance on the Alex Jones Show this week.
Earlier this week we covered the story of an innocent New
Mexico man who was forced to endure 14 hours of enforced anal probing at the hands of doctors, on
the orders of cops looking for narcotics, and was then billed by the medical center. It has now emerged that
this was not an isolated incident, and that ANOTHER person was treated the exact same way in the same medical
center.
In October, Timothy Young was pulled over by cops in Lordsburg, N.M for not using his blinker. According to
police reports, the same drug sniffing dog that featured in David Eckert’s ordeal, described above, again reacted
in Mr Young’s case.
KOB Eyewitness News 4 reports that Young was immediately taken to the same hospital, the Gila Regional Medical
Center in Silver City, and just like Eckert, was subjected to anal exams and x-rays of his stomach, without giving
his consent.
The examinations again turned up nothing, and it again
turned out that the “search warrant” obtained by the cops was issued in a different county to where the medical
exams took place.
KOB Eyewitness News 4 also reports that the drug sniffing dog’s certification expired in 2011 and was never
renewed. The law states that drug dogs must be re-certified every year.
“We have done public requests to find anything that would show this dog has been trained, we have evidence that
this dog has had false alerts in the past,” David Eckert’s attorney Shannon Kennedy said.
The medical center faces the possibility of hefty fines, with the doctors in question scheduled to face the
state licensing board, which may revoke their licenses to practice medicine.
The police officers involved in Young’s case will face a law enforcement disciplinary board, while in Eckert’s
case all involved are staring a weighty lawsuit in the face.
This second case indicates that police are conducting this procedure as a matter of routine when a drug sniffing
dog reacts to anyone they stop.
Indeed, we have covered severaldisturbingstories of innocent people being forced to undergo cavity searches at the hands of police who have no authority, flagrantly violating the
Constitutional rights of Americans.
—————————————————————-
Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of
Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from
Nottingham Trent University.
This article was posted: Thursday, November 7, 2013 at 10:39 am
The US military is in Afghanistan for two reasons. First to restore
and control the world’s largest supply of opium for the world heroin markets and to use the drugs as a geopolitical
weapon against opponents, especially Russia. That control of the Afghan drug market is essential for the liquidity
of the bankrupt and corrupt Wall Street financial mafia. ...The second reason the US military remains in
Afghanistan long after the world has forgotten even who the mysterious Osama bin Laden and his alleged Al Qaeda terrorist organization is or even if they exist, is as a pretext to
build a permanent US military strike force with a series of
permanent US airbases across Afghanistan. The aim of those bases is not to eradicate any Al Qaeda cells that may have survived in the caves of Tora Bora,
or to eradicate a mythical “Taliban” which at this point according to eyewitness
reports is made up overwhelmingly of local ordinary Afghanis fighting to rid their land once more of occupier
armies as they did in the 1980’s against the Russians.
When the animated series South Park lampooned the TSA, it
did so by suggesting that screeners routinely demand that Americans passing through airports must submit to anal
examinations. The exaggerated humor served to highlight a serious point – that TSA agents everywhere are violating
Americans’ privacy and constitutional rights by groping their genitals and searching inside their underwear.
A disturbing series of recent cases suggests that this exact thing is now REALLY happening in the US – except it
isn’t confined to airports, it is being carried out by police on the streets, and by doctors in hospitals at the
behest of law enforcement officials.
The stories have centered on New Mexico, where not one, not two, but THREE cases of law enforcement officials
enforcing humiliating and demeaning anal probes and body cavity searches WITHOUT CONSENT have been reported in
recent weeks.
By far the most appalling of these cases was that of David Eckert, who was subjected to FOURTEEN HOURS of
medical probes at the hands of doctors following orders from deputies with the Hidalgo County Sheriff’s Office and
police officers with the City of Deming.
Eckert’s crime? He did not come to a complete stop at a stop sign.
After pulling Eckert over, officers approached with a drug
sniffing dog which alerted. The officers then suggested Eckert was “clenching his
buttocks”, and that they had probable cause to have him examined.
While a doctor at one emergency room refused to go along with the “unethical” process, physicians at the Gila
Regional Medical Center in Silver City agreed to carry out the anal exams, happy that the police had secured a
“search warrant” from a judge.
The medical report released as part of the case indicates that police ordered doctors to carry out no less than
EIGHT anal and abdominal searches, consisting of 2 X-rays, 2 anal penetration examinations by hand, 3 enemas,
forcing Eckert to defecate in front of doctors and police each time, and finally a full colonoscopy, involving
inserting a camera into his anus, rectum, colon, and large intestine.
At no point were any drugs discovered. Eckert never gave consent for any of the procedures to be carried out and
was vocally resistant throughout. The police and doctors involved are now facing a hefty lawsuit and possibly being
both sacked and banned from law enforcement and the practice medicine respectively.
While Eckert’s attorneys are questioning whether a judge even has the authority to issue such a warrant to
search INSIDE a person’s body, what is not under any doubt is the fact that the horrific medical procedures were
carried out in a different county to the one in which said warrant had apparent jurisdiction. Some of the
procedures were also undertaken in the hours AFTER the warrant had expired.
“This is like something out of a science fiction film, anal probing by government officials and public
employees,” said Eckert’s attorney, Shannon Kennedy, who is arguing that there wasn’t sufficient probable cause in
the case.
“If the officers in Hidalgo County and the City of Deming are seeking warrants for anal cavity searches based on
how they’re standing and the warrant allows doctors at the Gila Hospital of Horrors to go in and do enemas and
colonoscopies without consent, then anyone can be seized and that’s why the public needs to know about this,” the
attorney added.
But this was not the end of the story. Eckert’s attorney has uncovered another case almost identical to his
ordeal, involving a second man being forcefully anally probed at the hands of the same police department and the
same doctors.
After not using his blinker at a junction, Timothy Young was pulled over by cops in Lordsburg, N.M and subjected
to a search involving the very same drug sniffing dog that featured in Eckert’s ordeal. When the dog again alerted,
Young was shipped off to the Gila Regional Medical Center and subjected to anal exams and x-rays of his stomach,
without giving his consent.
The examinations again turned up nothing, and it again
turned out that the “search warrant” obtained by the cops was issued in a different county to where the medical
exams took place.
The attorney in Eckert’s case also discovered that that the drug sniffing dog’s certification expired in 2011
and was never renewed. The law states that drug dogs must be re-certified every year.
“We have done public requests to find anything that would show this dog has been trained, we have evidence that
this dog has had false alerts in the past,” Kennedy said.
Following intense media coverage, a THIRD person from New Mexico, this time a woman, has come forward with a
similar story. Representing the woman, who wishes to remain anonymous, the ACLU states that federal border patrol
agents pressed their fingers into her vagina and anus without consent and without a warrant, following a drug dog
alerting to her at a Port of Entry from Juarez, Mexico into El Paso.
The agents are said to have stripped searched the woman at
their facility, asked her to spread her genitalia and to cough. Female agents also allegedly pressed their fingers
into her vagina looking for drugs, but turned up nothing. Medical records examined by the ACLU revealed that the
woman did not consent to the strip search or having her private parts sexually molested. The woman’s ordeal then
continued as the agents delivered her to the University Medical Center of El Paso.
“First, medical staff observed her making a bowl movement and no drugs were found at that point,” said Laura
Schaur Ives, Legal Director for the New Mexico Chapter of the ACLU. “They then took an X-ray, but it did not reveal
any contraband. They then did a cavity search and they probed her vagina and her anus, they described in the
medical records as bi-manual–two handed. Finally, they did a cat scan. Again, they found nothing.”
These cases indicate that police are conducting these procedure as a matter of routine when a drug sniffing dog
reacts to anyone they stop. The Americans in these cases have been treated worse than prisoners would be in maximum
security detention facilities, with total disregard for the Fourth Amendment, which is supposed to protect against
unreasonable searches and seizures.
It should also be noted that a prominent study from 2011 found that only 44% percent of all canine “alerts” turn up
any contraband. The analysis conducted by the Chicago Tribune, also found that in Chicago, the number of false
“alerts” jumped to 73 percent when police were confronting a Latino suspect. While this may mean that dogs are
being purposefully manipulated into reacting by discriminatory cops, a further study published in the January 2011 edition of the scientific journal Animal
Cognition found that dogs are overwhelmingly influenced by their handlers’ belief that drugs may be present. The
author of the study, Lisa Lit, noted that this aspect “might be as important — or even more important — than the
sensitivity of a dog’s nose” in such cases.
The three cases described above, are far from isolated incidents. In July of this year, two Houston women, made
headlines when Texas Department of Transportation (DPS) troopers performed embarrassing body cavity searches in
plain view on both women along a Houston highway. The justification for examining both the women’s anuses and
vaginas, was “an odor of marijuana” in their vehicle. In a dash-cam video of the incident the trooper is heard
telling one of the young women “we’re about to get up close and personal with your womanly parts.” After the search
was concluded the women complained of “severe and continuing pain and discomfort.”
Even more disturbingly, the trooper did not change her
gloves in between cavity searches, a blatant health and safety violation. The two women have filed a federal
lawsuit against DPS and are currently in litigation. While the senior trooper was later fired, the trooper that
followed the order to conduct the cavity searches was re-instated to duty, following a short suspension, after a
grand jury failed to indict her on any wrongdoings.
In an almost exact replica of this case, a trooper named Kelley Helleson from North Texas was charged with two
counts of sexual assault and two counts of official oppression by a Dallas County Grand Jury back in March, after
carrying out a search of the body cavities — front and back — of two women along an exit ramp of the Bush Turnpike
in Irving.
The women, Angel Dobbs, 38, and her niece, Ashley Dobbs, 24, were stopped after one of them threw a cigarette
out of their car window. Another trooper on the scene, David Farrell, was charged with theft after one of the women
complained that he stole her prescription bottle of the painkiller hydrocodone. The lawsuit also says Helleson
failed to properly explain the extent of the search, telling the women “not to worry about” why she was putting on
blue latex gloves.
DPS Director Steve McCraw, who oversaw both the cases described above, is accused in the second lawsuit of
failing to address a “long standing pattern of police misconduct involving unlawful strip searches, cavity searches
and the like…”
These ordeals, which amount to a gross violation of civil rights, make the TSA’s airport groping shenanigans
seem somewhat tame in comparison. In numerous other reported cases, while police are stopping short of full on anal
and vaginal searches, they are still terrorizing people in the streets by searching inside their underwear, in
plain view of the public. Police are also routinely stopping drivers and demanding blood, urine and even DNA
samples, without proper authorization.
The common factor in all of these cases is that police are
using the suspicion of a presence of narcotics as justification for conducting blatantly unconstitutional searches.
Unfortunately, this is the horrific fallout of the over hyped “war on drugs” that the government and the media have
been drilling into the minds of law enforcement officials for some 20+ years.
“Like the war on terror, the war on drugs is framed as a response to an exceptional, existential threat to our
health, our security, and indeed the very fabric of society. The ‘Addiction to narcotic drugs’ is portrayed as an
‘evil’ the international community has a moral duty to ‘combat’ because it is a ‘danger of incalculable gravity’
that warrants a series of (otherwise publicly unacceptable) extraordinary measures. This is not an exaggeration of
the political rhetoric. This crusading language has created a political climate in which drug war policy and
enforcement are not required to meet human rights norms.”
In addition to the bill of rights, every form of dignity is being degraded by design, as the phony drug war is
used by state and federal law enforcement personnel as a pretext to eviscerate privacy, raid private property, and
now, as we have seen, to literally rape Americans on the streets.
In their influential examination of the “war on drugs” researchers Jay Stanley and Barry
Steinhardt note:
“In recent years – in no small part as the result of the failed ‘war on drugs’ – Fourth Amendment principles
have been steadily eroding. The circumstances under which police and other government officials may conduct
warrantless searches has been rapidly expanding. The courts have allowed for increased surveillance and searches on
the nation’s highways and at our ‘borders’ (the legal definition of which actually extends hundreds of miles inland
from the actual border). And despite the Constitution’s plain language covering ‘persons’ and ‘effects,’ the courts
have increasingly allowed for warrantless searches when we are outside of our homes and ‘in public.’ Here the
courts have increasingly found we have no ‘reasonable expectation’ of privacy and that therefore the Fourth
Amendment does not apply.”
If the “war on drugs” were a legitimate operation it would have long ago proven an unmitigated failure. However,
it is a fake initiative, as underscored by information publicly released as part of FBI probes and Congressional investigations in the mid to late nineties, documenting
the fact that US federal agencies, including the CIA, have been shipping in vast quantities of illegal narcotics
for decades, with big banks laundering the ill gotten gains.
Until these flagrant violations of the law are properly addressed, Americans and anyone visiting America needs
to be aware that when traveling they must be wary of encountering law enforcement officials who will disregard
their inalienable rights without hesitation, and will bypass any concern for causing public humiliation of, or
physical and emotional damage to those they encounter.
—————————————————————-
Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of
Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from
Nottingham Trent University.
This article was posted: Friday, November 8, 2013 at 1:49 pm
Nighty News host David Knight breaks down the rampant hypocrisy of the federal government
as the border collapses and bureaucrats exploit children to push the globalist agenda. Nightly News reporters
Jakari Jackson and Sgt. Biggs file a report from South Texas on the border situation and Nancy Pelosi's
shameless effort to milk it for all the propaganda value she can.
Dr. Michael and Linda Vickers are the founders of Texas Border Volunteers, an organization that assists Border
Patrol in monitoring illegal alien activity that spills out onto their land and the surrounding ranches. The
increase includes an alarming amount of illegals from other parts of the world other than Mexico and South America.
This is a wake up call for those unaware of the dangers lurking in towns close to the United States-Mexico border.
And a hard lesson on whats to come if the current administration unleashes the wave of disease, terrorism, and
despotism that will certainly break the back of the United States of America. This is the first video in a series
of interviews with Dr. Michael and Linda Vickers.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
Choose an image to begin
Obama Launches Border Crisis To
Destroy America
Treason: America Destroyed by
Design Orchestrated collapse of America's borders part of
globalist plan to create a North American Union
With daily reports of illegal immigrants crossing into the United States, Infowars decided to head to south
Texas to investigate.We discovered how the U.S. Border Patrol was providing travel accommodations to the illegals
they were supposed to be detaining and putting on trial.
Border Patrol: Cartels Using De Facto Amnesty to Smuggle
“Whatever They Want” Into U.S.
"Who or what is coming in, we don't know and we won't know
until something bad happens," Border Patrol rep says
by Rob Dew, Kit Daniels & Joe Biggs | Infowars.com | June 27, 2014
In an exclusive interview with Infowars, the Vice President of a Border Patrol union in El Paso, Texas said the
drug cartels are taking advantage of the de facto amnesty the U.S. is granting illegals in order to smuggle
“whoever and whatever they want across the border.”
“It is the cartels pushing these groups across the river
to tie up our agents,” Stu Harris of the National Border Patrol Council Local 1929 said. “Meanwhile our agents are
tied up processing and feeding these people, changing diapers, and the drug cartels are running whoever and
whatever they want across the border and other places.
“Who or what is coming in, we don’t know and we won’t know until something bad happens.”
And he emphasized that this invasion only began recently.
“A lot of what we’re hearing in the media and a lot of other places is that the conditions in Central America,
such as the economic, are horrible conditions and there’s violence, gang violence, and that’s true,” Harris said.
“That’s a terrible way to have to live, but that’s been going on for more than ten years.”
“So for this invasion to start suddenly happening, something else had to change, and what changed is the fact
that we were engaging in this ‘catch & release’ program and word spreads fast.”
As part of the immigration processing at detention facilities, Border Patrol agents ask illegal aliens why they
are currently coming to the U.S. and 90% of them say its because of the de facto amnesty, according to Harris.
“They know they are going to be processed and released and they are free to go wherever they want to go in the
United States and the likelihood of them ever showing up for their court date is slim to none,” he said. “Even if
they did show up to their court date, what we’re going to start seeing is what we call the ‘anchor babies’ because
these court dates are being set from what I understand so far down the road that these people are going to come
here, settle in, some of them are going to have children, and those citizens are now United States citizens.”
“How is a judge going to deport these people if they have a United States citizen as a child?”
Stand Down: U.S. Border Gate Left Wide Open,
Unguarded
Reporters observe de facto open border policy
in real time
by Infowars.com | June 27, 2014
The U.S. Border Protection agency is either abiding by a stand
down order, or is so busy performing other tasks they’re completely leaving entire sections of the
border unguarded and indeed wide open, Infowars reporters observed yesterday.
In El Paso, Texas, investigating the Central American immigrant surge, reporters Joe Biggs and Rob
Dew ventured near the Rio Grande river, where they encountered a large border fence on the U.S. side
sitting wide open and unguarded for a lengthy period.
“As we’ve documented, the Border patrol has been paying to ship these kids in, bus them in, fly them
in to our country, and now the gates are left completely wide open,” Staff Sgt. Biggs reports.
We’ve also documented some agents are so frustrated with being forced to break immigration laws, in
addition to having to prepare sandwiches, make food and drink runs and perform mass laundry detail,
they’re leaving the agency in search of new employment.
Last week Infowars reporters also traveled down to the Rio Grande Valley, ground zero where
immigrants from Central America are staging a virtually uncontested U.S. invasion, and were amazed to
find little to no Border Patrol vehicles in the area near the Brownsville & Matamoros International
Bridge.
“In and around Brownsville, far more Border Patrol vehicles could be seen parked at various
government facilities than patrolling the streets and surrounding areas,” Kit Daniels reported, “contrary to what one would expect considering the
current flood of tens of thousands of immigrants from Central America crossing the border.”
THE CIA
An independent agency of the United States government responsible for
collecting and coordinating intelligence and counterintelligence activities abroad in the national
interest; headed by the Director of Central Intelligence under the supervision of the President and
National Security Council...There has been considerable criticism of the CIA relating to security
and counterintelligence failures, failures in intelligence analysis, human rights concerns,
external investigations and document releases, influencing public opinion and law enforcement, drug
trafficking, and lying to Congress. In 1987, the former CIA Station Chief in Angola in 1976, John
Stockwell, said the CIA is responsible for tens of thousands of covert actions and destablization
programs since it was created by Congress with the passage of the National Security Act of
1947.At the time, Stockwell estimated that over 6
million people had died in CIA covert actions.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is a governmental agency
belonging to the United StatesDepartment of Justice that serves as both a federal criminal
investigative body and an internal intelligence agency (counterintelligence). Also, it is the
government agency responsible for investigating crimes on Indian reservations in the United States
under the Major Crimes Act. The branch has investigative jurisdiction over violations of more than
200 categories of federal crime. The agency was established in 1908 as the Bureau of Investigation
(BOI). Its name was changed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 1935. The agency
headquarters is the J. Edgar Hoover Building, located in Washington, D.C. The agency has fifty-six
field offices located in major cities throughout the United States, and more than 400 resident
agencies in lesser cities and areas across the nation. More than 50 international offices called
"legal attachés" exist in U.S. embassies and consulates general worldwide.
'Federal Bureau of Investigation organizes almost
all terror plots in the US' ...The report reveals that the FBI regularly infiltrates communities
where they suspect terrorist-minded individuals to be engaging with others. Regardless of their
intentions, agents are sent in to converse within the community, find suspects that could
potentially carry out “lone wolf” attacks and then, more or less, encourage them to do so. By
providing weaponry, funds and a plan, FBI-directed agents will encourage otherwise-unwilling
participants to plot out terrorist attacks, only to bust them before any events fully
materialize.
How could there be aWar on Terror and actually say that we're having
awar against terrorism, and leave the
borders wide open? If you were the President of the United States, or I were the President of the United States,
and9/11 really happened the way they
want us to believe it happened, the first thing you would do is shut down the borders, so people couldn't get in
the country to harm you. But they left the borders wide open. Becausethe bankers want the borders open, because they want
aone-world government. They
want a North American Union. They don't want borders
here.9/11 was only a manifestation.
It was done to create afear in the
American public, so that we willobey what they want us to do.
Infowars is set to commission a poll by a professional polling agency that will ask Americans if
they are willing to submit to a TSA anal cavity search in order to fly. We reckon a solid 10-20 per cent would say
yes. What other questions should be asked in order to illustrate how much indignity travelers will tolerate?
"I freed a thousand slaves; I
could have freed a thousand more, if only they knew they were slaves."
Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who
are constantly and intelligently on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic
procedures.
"A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time,
not on the spot, not here and now and in their calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other
worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the
encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it.”
