According to the driving force behind Big Sis’ creepy Wal-Mart spy campaign, if the state
encouraging Americans to report each other to the authorities causes you unease, you’re insane, similar to how
critics of informant programs were also branded mentally ill and persecuted in the former Soviet
Union
...At the height of its influence around one in seven of the East German population was
an informant for the Stasi. As in Nazi Germany, the creation of an informant system was wholly centered around
identifying political dissidents and those with grievances against the state, and had little or nothing to do
with genuine security concerns.
Critics Of Big Sis/Wal-Mart Spy Campaign
Branded Insane
Given the fact that Palm Beach County Sheriff Ric Bradshaw is set to launch a $1 million dollar
program which will encourage Floridians to report on people who "hate government," how long before Palm Beach
resident Rush Limbaugh is sent to a Soviet-style mental hospital?
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
December 8, 2010
According to the driving
force behind Big Sis’ creepy Wal-Mart spy campaign, if the state encouraging Americans to report each other to the
authorities causes you unease, you’re insane, similar to how critics of informant programs were also branded
mentally ill and persecuted in the former Soviet Union.
In what has been dubbed “the battle of Wal-Mart” by The New York Observer, the
controversy over Big Sis Janet Napolitano’s announcement that Homeland Security
messages encouraging shoppers to “report suspicious activity,” without telling them what constitutes suspicious activity, will play at Wal-Mart checkouts,
has “set off a rebellion among the conspiracy-theory crowd, a number of whom are among the store’s core customers,”
writes Aaron Gell.
But the man behind the creepy slogan, “If you see something, say something,”
claims that the likes of Matt Drudge and Alex Jones’ opposition to the campaign is “ridiculous”.
“That’s absurd. The whole reason for doing it was to save lives, and I think the
sane people of the world see it as a positive slogan,” said Allen Kay, of Korey Kay & Partners, implying that
anyone who perceives the state encouraging citizens to report on each other as a negative move towards an
authoritarian society is insane.
Kay’s glib justification that the campaign is about saving lives can be demolished
from two angles.
Firstly, even if you believe that Muslim terrorists are creeping around every
street corner with bombs in their underpants, and it’s a legitimate concern given the fact
thatthe FBI is so keen on providing such dimwits with all the explosives they
need, then why has the federal government and Homeland Security instead
labeled politically aware, patriotic Americans to be the number one domestic terror threat?
Given the fact that rhetoric identifying conservative and libertarian Americans as
domestic extremists has saturated the news media, don’t be surprised when ignorant Wal-Mart shoppers begin to
report people who wear t-shirts with political slogans or ones that carry an image of the
upside-down American flag, or merelyindividuals who
talk about the Constitution, since federal authorities have identified all
these as examples of terrorism in numerous cases over the last several years.
Secondly, no matter where you look, from East Germany, to Communist Russia, to
Nazi Germany, historically governments who encourage their own citizens to report on each other do so not for any
genuine safety concerns or presumed benefits to security, but in order to create an authoritarian police state that
coerces the people into policing each other’s behavior and thoughts.
As Robert Gellately of Florida
State University has highlighted, Germans under Hitler denounced their
neighbors and friends not because they genuinely believed them to be a security threat, but because they expected
to selfishly benefit from doing so, both financially, socially and psychologically via a pavlovian need to be
rewarded by their masters for their obedience.
At the height of its influence aroundone in seven of the East German
population was an informant for the Stasi. As in Nazi Germany, the
creation of an informant system was wholly centered around identifying political dissidents and those with
grievances against the state, and had little or nothing to do with genuine security concerns.
Even if you subscribe to the notion that Americans should be spied on, which is
completely unconstitutional in and of itself, should that role be entrusted to untrained Wal-Mart
shoppers?
If Americans are going to be policed by a 21st century KGB, can the watchers at
least be professionally recruited and trained? No, because having fat slobs report on “suspicious activity” that is
defined by what they were told on ABC News last night or what they saw in a plot
of24 orCSI Miami makes it a lot easier for Big Sis to chill free speech and frighten Americans away
from exercising their rights.
Every example in recent history of a government enlisting its population as a
swarming army of spies leads to, at the bare minimum, the evisceration of freedom and the creation of an autocratic
dictatorship, and in the worst case, mass political oppression, assassination of political dissidents or outright
genocide.
Judging by Wal-Mart’s response in refusing to acknowledge the scale of the
backlash they have received in reaction to the announcement on Monday, and their slavish repetition of the glib
Orwellian rhetoric that the spy campaign is about safety and security, Americans are outraged, and until Wal-Mart
kills this un-American insult to everything that the country stands for, their Christmas is going to be a lot less
profitable than expected, with numerous boycotts already on the horizon.
Germans under Hitler denounced their neighbors and friends not because they genuinely
believed them to be a security threat, but because they expected to selfishly benefit from doing so, both
financially, socially and psychologically via a pavlovian need to be rewarded by their masters for their
obedience.
At the height of its influence around one in seven of the East German population was an
informant for the Stasi. As in Nazi Germany, the creation of an informant system was wholly centered around
identifying political dissidents and those with grievances against the state, and had little or nothing to do with
genuine security concerns.
FBI Plants Informant in Mosque to Incite Violence; Muslims
Report Him to FBI
Before the sun rose, the informant donned a white Islamic robe. A tiny camera was sewn into a button, and a
microphone was buried in a device attached to his keys.
“This is Farouk al-Aziz, code name Oracle,” he said into the keys as he sat in his parked car in this quiet
community south of Los Angeles. “It’s November 13th, 4:30 a.m. And we’re hot.”
The undercover FBI informant – a convicted forger named Craig Monteilh – then drove off for 5 a.m. prayers at
the Islamic Center of Irvine, where he says he spied on dozens of worshipers in a quest for potential
terrorists.
…
Worshipers said Monteilh gravitated to Ahmadullah Sais Niazi, an Afghan-born Arabic-language instructor who was
a regular at Friday prayers.
In May 2007, Monteilh said he recorded a conversation about jihad during a car ride with Niazi and another man.
Monteilh said he suggested an operation to blow up buildings and Niazi agreed. An FBI agent later cited that and
other taped conversations between the two in court as evidence that Niazi was a threat.
A few days later, Ayloush got an anguished phone call from Niazi and the other man in the car.
“They said Farouk had told them he had access to weapons and that they should blow up a mall,” Ayloush recalled.
“They were convinced this man was a terrorist.”
Ayloush reported the FBI’s own informant to the FBI. He said agents interviewed Niazi, who
gave them the same account, but the agency took no action against Monteilh.
Current Department of Defense anti-terrorism
training course material states that the exercise of First Amendment rights in the U.S. constitutes terrorist
activity.
The ACLU has written to the DoD regarding its Antiterrorism and Force Protection Annual
Refresher Training Course, which advises personnel that political protest amounts to “low-level
terrorism”.
“It has come to our attention that the Department of Defense’s Annual Level I Antiterrorism (AT)
Training for 2009 misinforms Department of Defense (DoD) personnel that certain First Amendment-protected activity
may amount to “low level terrorism” The ACLU writes.
“We are writing to ask that you take immediate steps to remedy this situation.” the letter to
acting Under-Secretary Gail McGinn states.
A PDF of the ACLU’s letter also contains print outs of the relevant sections of
the course material.
The training introduction reads:
“Anti-terrorism (AT) and Force Protection (FP) are two facets of the Department of Defense (DoD) Mission
Assurance Program. It is DoD policy, as found in DoD I 2000.16, that the DoD Components and the DoD elements
and personnel shall be protected from terrorist acts through a high priority, comprehensive, AT program. The
DoD’s AT program shall be all encompassing using an integrated systems approach.”
The first question of the Terrorism Threat Factors, “Knowledge Check 1″ section reads:
Which of the following is an example of low-level terrorism activity?
Select the correct answer and then click Check Your Answer.
Attacking the Pentagon
IEDs
Hate crimes against racial groups
Protests
In order to proceed, users must give the “correct” answer as “Protests”.
According to the document, all DoD personnel are required to complete the course on a yearly
basis.
The ACLU points out that although in and of itself the classification of protest as terrorism is
deeply disturbing, it is even more alarming when viewed in the context of the Pentagon’s long term efforts to crack down on organized dissent.
Other precedents that the ACLU neglected to mention in it’s letter include, most recently, the fact
that the FBI were spying on “Tea Party” protesters nationwide.
One week prior to those revelations, we also reported that the Maryland National Guard was put on alert in anticipation of the nationwide
protests, while a Homeland Security spokesman refused to deny that protesters would be under surveillance from
the DHS.
The Maryland National Guard issued a Force Protection Advisory on April 11 which warned the
National Guard to be on alert during the Tea Party protests because Guardsmen and Guard facilities might become
“targets of opportunity.” The contact point for the document was listed as the Antiterrorism Program
Coordinator.
The advisory was almost exactly the same as a United States Army Reserve Command Force Protection
Advisory that was issued last November before the nationwide End the Fed protests, warning that protesters were
congregating across the country to demonstrate against the private Federal Reserve.
Over the last few years we have seen countless examples of security assessment reports from the likes of the
Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI, as well as police training manuals,
which state that anti-war protesters, gun owners, veterans, Ron Paul supporters and those who merely cite the
Constitution should be equated with extremists.
The continued surveillance of protesters, in addition to the ongoing agenda to equate dissent with
terrorism, highlights the fact that the architecture of the police state, which was massively expanded under George
W. Bush, has not been dismantled or relaxed by an Obama administration that promised “change,”. If anything, it has
only grown bigger.
The Obama administration’s announcement that the illegal warrantless surveillance of American citizens, a
program initiated under Bush, will continue and in fact intensify under Obama, is another shining example of the fact
that – no matter who is in power and no matter the political persuasion of those being watched – all Americans
who have the temerity to exercise constitutional rights are considered dangerous and worthy of being targeted by
the federal government with surveillance tools supposedly introduced to fight terrorists.
This article was posted: Monday, June 15, 2009 at 6:26 pm
What's in a name? Everything. Find out about the latest attempt to package the
Orwellian total police state surveillance grid as something wonderful and wholesome—and why you
should never, ever say "contact tracing"—in this week's edition of #PropagandaWatch.
The Canadian government is currently ramping up their efforts to fight the spread of Covid-19 by
giving sweeping powers to police and by taking big brother into the digital realm. Contact tracing
apps are popping up on the provincial level and we may soon see a nationwide collective effort to
track trace and database every single thing everyone does. Meanwhile families are being forcefully
removed from their homes and taken to psychiatric facilities for peacefully protesting the
governments abuse of power. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth covers the latest police
state news in Canada while also providing workable solutions on how to avoid being tracked by the
government in this post Covid-19(84) world.
A Women Gets Her Contact Tracer Certificates and Tells
All
DanaThynes | 30 May 2020
A woman's look at the Contact Tracer documents. This is BAD news. "Isolation" and "quarantine"
can be imposed again and again, the way the documents read.
As the people of the world grapple with a pandemic that is demonstrably less deadly
than originally reported, the public is being primed to accept an exponential increase in invasions of personal
liberty and privacy. Every day the public grows more weary of lock downs which seem to never end, and the
bankrupting of individuals and businesses around the world. Amidst the frustration and protest a solution is being
presented.
To return to normal, we are told, we must accept certain changes to how our world
operates. Of course, this is actually a push to a “new normal” which will mark the worldafterCOVID-19. Just like the attacks of September 11, 2001, there is the world
we knew before, and there is the post-9/11 era. We are currently in the middle of the COVID-19 era and a shift to
post-COVID19 life will not happen without the completion of local, state, national, and international programs
which identify potential infectees, test them, and, if positive, quarantine them in their homes or other government
facilities.
This is what is known as a contact tracing program. You have likely heard the term
in recent days and weeks because a number of local and state bodies within the United States are considering or
already launching contact tracing programs. Nations like China, Singapore, India, South Korea, and Israel have
implemented these programs but have also faced criticism from digital rights advocates for violations of privacy
protections.
So what exactly is contact tracing?
Contact tracing is a process of identifying individuals who may have come into
contact with an infected person, collecting information about their contacts, and then tracing the contacts of
infected individuals. All persons who may have come into contact with an infected individual are tested for
infection, treated for the infection, and their contacts traced as well.
Regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, we are seeing calls for digital contact tracing
using cell phones to notify individuals when they may have come into contact with an infected person or visited a
hot spot of infection. Digital contact tracing apps use Bluetooth to track encounters, a move which is supposed to
anonymize actual location data. Other forms of contact tracing apps involve the use of location data gathered from
cellular networks.
Additionally, tech giants Apple and Google have promised to help slow the spread of
the virus with new
tracking apps that the public can download to report themselves as infected. Using Bluetooth,
the phones will warn app users when they are near an infected person or a hot spot. The programs will use data
from Android and iPhone users who volunteer for the program later this month. Jennifer Granick, a surveillance
and cybersecurity attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union told Politico that the joint effort between
the tech companies “appears to mitigate the worst privacy and centralization risks.” However, “there
is still room for improvement.”
Microsoft is collaborating with the University of Washington on their own project
which the university promotes as a privacy based contact tracing app. Researchers with the University of Washington
and UW Medicine worked with volunteers from Microsoft to develop CovidSafe. The
researchers stated that the app will alert users about potential exposure to COVID-19, but will do so without
giving up anyone’s privacy.
“With CovidSafe, all information is stored locally on your phone unless you choose to share
that you’ve tested positive,”explained Justin Chan, a UW doctoral student in the Paul
G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering.“Only then is your data sent to a
secure server, and the app alerts anyone who has been nearby. After these notifications are sent, all the
information is deleted.”
CovidSafe is not the only attempt to build a privacy-based contact tracing program.
In April, a team of researchers launched Coalition, a free contact tracing app designed to protect users’ privacy and
protect communities during the COVID-19 crisis. Coalition claims to utilize secure Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) and
cryptography to protect a user’s identity by generating random anonymous IDs. The app uses Coalition’s Whisper
Tracing, an open source privacy-first protocol that randomizes a user’s device identity and does not share
identifiable information with the cloud.
Building a Contact Tracing Army
New York Governor Andrew Cuomorecently announced efforts by NY state to hire thousands
of contact tracers. The state’s contact tracing program is being developed with $10 million from former New York
City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and support from Johns Hopkins University. Cuomo stated that applicants will need to
go through a training program and pass an online exam before being granted the authority of contact tracer. The
state’s program will involve identifying COVID-19 positive individuals, interviewing them about contacts in the
previous two weeks, and then those contacts must isolate for two weeks.
By late April, calls for contact tracing had grown so loud that Congressman John
Garamendi introduced a bill that would “expand volunteer opportunities within AmeriCorps and the
Federal Emergency Management Agency”. Garamendi is the Co-Chair of the AmeriCorps, a nationwide volunteer force
created by former President Bill Clinton in 1993. The Orwellian bill –“Undertaking
National Initiatives to Tackle Epidemic Act”or the UNITE Act – would allow AmeriCorps
and FEMA to create a national contact-tracing corps.
“The coronavirus pandemic has put an unprecedented strain on our society, and our
nation requires a significant scaling of testing and contact tracing in order to flatten the curve and lift
stay-at-home orders,”
Garamendi stated.
Coincidentally, the UNITE Act lines up with recent calls for a contact tracing
“army”. The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control called for more contact tracers in the
state. Dr. Joan Duwve, the Director of Public Health for DHEC, said being able to test someone rapidly was
necessary.“We need an army of contact tracers to respond in
a short time to someone who has a positive diagnosis,”Duwve said.
On the opposite side of the country, California Governor Gavin Newsom has partnered
with the University of California, Los Angeles and the University of California, San Francisco to train more than
3,000 employees to become “coronavirus detectives“. During a live streamed press conference Newsom described the
efforts as a training academy designed to build an “army” of 20,000 people who can test, trace, and isolate people who may be infected.
Sonia Angell, California Department of Public Health director and State Health Officer, also stated that the new
contact tracing program will be connected to California’s existing digital disease surveillance platform. Angell
claims the database will be confidential.
The push for international contact tracing programs has also blossomed in nations
like South Korea and China, who are praised for their aggressive approaches to slowing the growth of the virus.
Forbes noted that South Korea has had a massive drop in COVID-19
diagnoses largely due to “mass rapid testing and comprehensive digitally-enabled contact tracing”. South Korea has
also used GPS phone tracking, CCTV cameras, credit card transaction monitoring, and automated text alerts as part
of a comprehensive universal contact tracing program.
The Chinese government approach is what you would expect from a totalitarian
communist state: an all encompassing app that pretty much “controls your
life.” Bloomberg describes China’s contact tracing app as a “public-private ‘health code’
system” which issues one of three risk assessments in the form of a colored QR code.“A green QR code, which denotes a low risk of having the virus, is the general default, while coming
into contact with an infected person can trigger a yellow code and a mandatory quarantine. Red is for a likely
or confirmed case,”Bloombergreported.It
does not take an extremely paranoid mind to see how this system could be easily abused.
The Indian government recently launched their contact tracing app
– Aarogya Setu – which quickly became the fastest downloaded
app on record, with more than 83 million users. Although India is not the first nation to implement a
nationwide contact tracing program, the nation lacks strong privacy and data protection laws for its more
than 1.3 billion citizens. The Guardian reported that the pandemic is being “used as a pretext to erode privacy and
freedom of speech in the name of ‘winning the war’ against coronavirus.” In April The Guardian revealed that a draft government memo explained how the data
gathered by the contact-tracing app could be “de-anonymized” by government officials.
Israel’s attempted grab for tyrannical health surveillance powers were recently
hampered by a decision from the Supreme Court which banned the intelligence community from
tracing the phone location of those infected with COVID-19. The Israeli Shin Bet service was
given emergency powers through the end of April before the court warned of a “slippery slope” where the
surveillance tool could be used against innocent individuals. Whitney Webb recently reported that at least three tech companies involved in the build out
of the “coronavirus surveillance system” have connections to Israel’s government and the usual Big Tech
players.
Following The Orders of the WHO
In early April, Dr. Michael Ryan, the head of the
World Health Organization’s team responsible for the international containment and treatment of
COVID-19, called for looking into families to find potentially sick individuals and isolate them from their
families.
“Due to lock down, most of the transmission that is actually happening in many
countries now is happening in the household at a family level,”Ryan
stated. “In some senses, the transmission has actually been taken off the streets
and pushed back into family units… Now we need to go and look into families, and find those people
who are sick and remove them and isolate them in a safe and dignified manner.”
Ryan was also involved in the now-infamous Event 201, a global
pandemic simulation, conducted on October 18, 2019, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World
Economic Forum, and John Hopkins University Center for Health Security.
Ryan’s bio states that “from November 2013 to October 2014 he worked with GPEI as Middle East
Polio Response Coordinator” and partnered with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (among others) for a
vaccination program which reached 25 million children in eight target countries as part of 44 mass polio
vaccination campaigns.
Ironically enough, the WHO released a document in 2019 which states that under no
circumstances should contract tracing be used. The document, first
reported on by independent researcher Kenny Palurintano, details the WHO’s views on
Non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) in response to a pandemic. In section 6.1, “Contact Tracing,” under “quality
of evidence”, it states, “There is a very low overall quality of evidence that contact tracing has an unknown
effect on the transmission of influenza.” Additionally, under the “Executive Summary”, in Table 1, the WHO
lists contact tracing under the heading “Not Recommend In Any Circumstances”.
Despite the WHO’s own documents denying the validity of contact tracing, officials
in Ventura County are heeding the call of WHO official Dr. Michael Ryan. At a May 4 press conference, Ventura County
Public Health Director Dr. Robert Levin said those who live in homes where they could expose family members to
COVID-19 could be removed from their homes and moved into other health facilities.
“We also realize that as we find more contacts, some of the people we find are
going to have trouble being isolated. For instance, if they live in a home where there is only one bathroom and
there are three or four other people living there, and those people don’t have COVID infection, we’re not going to
be able to keep the person in that home,”Levin stated.“Every person who we’re isolating, for instance, needs to have their own bathroom.And so we’ll
be moving people like this into other kinds of housing that we have available.”
The Ventura County Public Health board did not elaborate on what other kinds of
housing might be made available to those unable to quarantine at home.
If there is a silver lining to the growing support for contact tracing, it might be
the public’s own hesitance to join. According to Forbes, nation-states need about 60 percent of their population to adopt
and regularly use the tool for it to be effective. Forbes reports that most cities are not likely to achieve 60% or
even 40% compliance. Unfortunately,Forbesreminds
us,“It’s a relentless fight. Andit takes an army of tracers.”
Forbes also notes that cities will need to “force changes of behavior” before reopening society.
“Contact-tracing apps are being seen as one of the conditions of ending
lockdowns—mandating and enforcing their use might become a logical next
step.“
How exactly the cities, states, and nations will enforce the use of contact tracing
apps remains to be seen, but we are already seeing a rise in reports of arrests of individuals who violate orders
to close businesses, stay home, and practice social distancing. What should we expect to see when an individual or
an entire community chooses to opt-out of contact tracing surveillance programs?
It is important to understand that contract tracing is only one part of an overall
strategy which poses a danger to liberty and privacy. In addition to creating mobile apps which snitch on you,
Apple, Facebook and Google are also sharing data
with the government to help determine if the public is following social distancing guidelines.
MIT Technology Review reported that at least one company is selling an app that uses machine
learning Artificial Intelligence to monitor social distancing. Meanwhile, Reuters reported that Amazon is using similar software to enforce social distancing
between their warehouse staff. There are also reports of “pandemic drones” flying above the skies of Connecticut
and Maryland to monitor social distancing and take temperatures.
Together these technologies represent the foundation of the Technocratic State,
built on top of the fears of a public which has been conditioned to accept any and all relief from the terrifying
round-the-clock coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic. If the public accepts the COVID1984 Technocracy in the name of
“getting back to normal” it’s likely the world we have known will be regarded as a relic of a past era, a quaint
idea of what life was like and what it could be, if only the public could defeat the new invisible enemy, COVID19.
However, it’s important to understand the institutions which are benefitting from the current pandemic. Only by
acknowledging the true power players – those who maneuver behind the scenes to profit and enslave – can the free
hearts and minds of the world defeat the true enemy: COVID-1984.
H.R.
6666: $100 Billion Dollar Contact Tracing Bill About
Controlling/Tracking Population Ben Swann | May 12, 2020
A House resolution from Illinois Democrat Rep. Bobby Rush that would put Big Government in charge
of tracking citizens’ movements as they relate to COVID-19 mitigation efforts — even sending health
bureaucrats to “individuals’ residences,” “as necessary,” as the legislation states
Doctors Forced to Become State Snitches to Spot “Radical”
Patients
NHS demands GPs monitor potential
extremists
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
March 10, 2014
Doctors in Britain are being forced to become state
snitches and spot “radical” patients under an NHS initiative that threatens to cut funding if a GP practice fails
to take part in the program.
Under the new NHS England policy, every GP practice must send a member of staff on the “Prevent”
counter terrorism course, during which they are trained to detect patients who are ” vulnerable to radicalization,”
before notifying authorities.
In addition to the “lead” staff member who takes the course, all employees of the practice must be
made aware of the strategy.
Labeling the program “mindless bureaucracy,” former GPC chair Dr Laurence Buckman said, “It is so
silly and ridiculous that I can’t believe NHS England are requiring this or making CCGs responsible for it.”
Other doctors raised the issue that forcing GPs to become informants for the state by demanding
they monitor “radicalization” of patients would be a clear breach of patient-doctor confidentiality.
“It is completely disproportionate and a poor use of GP resources and time. It is effectively
asking GPs to be a government intelligence agency,” Dr Maureen Baker, chairwoman of the Royal College of General
Practitioners, told the
Express.
As we have highlighted, British authorities have cited the need to combat radical political beliefs
as a justification for invasive and chilling state interference in the private lives of citizens.
Last week, the Mayor of London Boris
Johnson said that parents who teach their children to be “full of hate” should be targeted by social
services, with Johnson suggesting that children whose parents are supporters of the British National Party, a
right-wing organization that vehemently opposes immigration, may be taken into care in “extreme” circumstances.
However, children are already being taken from parents in much less “extreme” circumstances, such
as in the case of a couple who had their foster children removed by the state because they were members of the UK Independence Party, the third largest political party
in Britain.
Meanwhile, Scotland
recently passed a law that designates a state minder to every child in the country up to the age of 18, a
move described by the Christian Institute as a, “dreadful extension of the state’s tentacles into family life.”
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is
the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
This article was posted: Monday, March 10, 2014 at 10:08 am
Feel like a healthy bit of gallows humor? Seems like Alex Jones had just gotten a new gig
as a Barista when his mind started playing tricks on him. All that "See Something Say Something" dogma might have
gone to his head this time. Or maybe the propaganda by Big Sis, Homeland Security, Infra-guard, or those pesky
F.B.I. leaflets have finally turned him to the dark side. Tune in and see what kind of trouble the alter-ego
mobster style Alex Jones can get himself into when he turns Federal Informant for the Infra-Guard.
CIA Pacification Programs, Secret Interrogation Centers, Counter Terror Teams,
Propaganda Teams and military and civilian tribunals in all 44 provinces of South Vietnam; 1965 US
military sent in; National Liberation Front; secret 1967 CIA General Staff For Pacification
combining all CIA, military, and South Vietnamese programs to became The Phoenix
Program; Phoenix based on systems analysis theory combining 20-30 programs to pacify South
Vietnamese civilians to support the government; Phoenix instituted to more perfectly coordinate CIA
and military operations; streamlined and bureaucratized a system of political repression in South
Vietnam; media cover-up; CIA Foreign Intelligence including the Hamlet Information Program, the
Province Interrogation Center program and Agent Penetrations; CIA Covert Action Program; reliance
on corruption; Pacific Architects and Engineers oversaw design and construction of interrogation
centers in South Vietnam which became the model for the black sites.
Originally Aired: January 11, 2017
Mayor Bill de Blasio
@NYCMayor
Twitter | Apr 18,
2020
How do
you report places that aren’t enforcing social distancing? It’s simple: just
snap a photo and text it to 311-692. #AskMyMayor
'Snitches Get Rewards': Mayor Eric Garcetti
Encourages Community To Report Businesses Violating
Safer At Home Orders
CBS Los Angeles | Mar 31, 2020
Mayor Eric Garcetti encouraged members of the community to
continue reporting businesses that violate the city's Safer at Home order to the
city for enforcement.
Douglas Valentine Interview How The
COVID-19 Police State Was Born In Vietnam
The Last American Vagabond | 4/28/20
Whitney Webb is joined today by author and researcher Douglas Valentine. Doug is
the author of 4 excellent books, of which "The Phoenix Program: America's Use of Terror in Vietnam"
is particularly relevant to what is taking place today. Whitney and Doug discuss what took place
all those years ago in Vietnam, the subversive efforts led by the CIA, and how it seems to be the
groundwork for what is being implemented today under the guise of COVID-19.
Resistance To
Lockdown Builds - Coronavirus Tyrants Losing Their
Grip -
RonPaulLibertyReport
From Maine to California, Americans are defying government officials and
reclaiming their First Amendment rights to assemble and protest. They are opening their businesses
up in open defiance of the authoritarian political leaders. The resistance is building and
thankfully remains (mostly) peaceful. How long until the dam breaks and the lockdown regime comes
crashing down?
When an unskilled, $17/hour “contact tracer” shows up on your doorstep, how will you respond? Will he or she be
able to wreck your life in a few short minutes? Follow the saga of Henry Kron and his family.
Be sure to see all the headlines and the video at the end of the story! There’s more. Much more. That’s why it’s
“to be continued…” TN Editor
Henry Kron and his wife Helen had just enjoyed a family dinner time with their two pre-teen daughters, Leanne
and Elise. Henry headed to the coat closet to get the girls’ favorite board game off the top shelf.
He had promised that this would be “game night” and they were all looking forward to it.
Actually, life was just starting to look good again after the extended lockdown during the global pandemic. That
one had cost Henry his last job and finding a new job was next to impossible with 40 million other Americans out of
work at the same time.
In fact, the lack of income for several months left them unable to make their house payment for two months in
row. They came within an inch of being foreclosed. Their retirement fund wasn’t large, but it took the whole thing
just to get caught up.
With a lot of hard work and a bit of luck, Henry had finally landed a good job. Even though he would be on
probation for the first 90 days, he was determined to do whatever it would take to keep the job.
Just as they decided who would get to roll the dice to start the game, the doorbell rang.
Henry went to the door thinking “Who would call on us at this time of the evening?” He certainly was not
expecting anyone.
As he opened the door, there stood a soldier in a crisp, clean fatigue uniform.
“Mr. Kron?” he asked.
“Yes,” replied Henry, “is something going on in the neighborhood?”
“No, sir,” he replied, “I am here to give you and your family a coronavirus test because we received a report
that you have unknowingly been exposed to someone who actually had the virus.”
“What? Who was that?” Henry asked.
“I’m not at liberty to say, sir,” he replied, “All of that kind of information is private and confidential.”
Henry immediately thought back to the restaurant he and his wife visited for dinner two days ago. They were
asking each guest to fill out a form with their name and address info, and they did. The waitress said it had
something to do with contact tracing rules just implemented in their state.
The soldier explained that testing was mandatory but there would be no cost to him. It would only take a couple
of minutes to take samples from everyone in the household.
Reluctantly, Henry consented. What else could he do?
After signing the HIPAA agreement and liability waiver, the soldier took a quick cheek swab of all four of
them.
“I will take these kits to the lab for processing tonight,” he said, “and I will personally get back to you in
the morning with the results.”
“Oh, and Mr. Kron, until you hear from me, please remain at home, just in case.”
After this intrusion, game night was overshadowed by the fear of “what if”. Nobody really felt like laughing and
Henry and Helen had a restless night after the girls went to bed.
Just after breakfast the next morning, the phone rang.
“This is Henry Kron speaking,” he answered as he picked it up with a twinge of dread in his stomach.
“Mr. Kron, I’m sorry to report that your wife Helen tested positive for COVID-19 even though she has no symptoms
yet,” the caller said, “so, your family will have to make some adjustments over the next two weeks.”
“What kind of adjustments?” Henry asked.
“Well, you will all have to ‘self-quarantine at home’ and avoid contact with anyone else,” the caller explained.
“We can help you with any needs you might have, like groceries or pharmaceuticals.”
“You mean my daughters can’t go to school?”
“That’s correct, sir, they will have to stay home for the duration.”
“Do you mean I can’t go to work?”
“That’s also correct, sir, but only for two weeks. We will test all of you again at the end just to confirm that
you are all in the clear.”
Henry was starting to feel a sense of panic. Could they really do this to him?
“Wait!” Henry exclaimed, “If I don’t go to work tomorrow, I will be fired from my new job, and if I get fired
again, I will lose my house. In any case, I just read that your COVID-19 tests are returning a high percentage of
false positives. You can’t do this to me!”
“I understand how you feel, sir, but our contact tracing guidelines are very clear and your cooperation is
essential to help keep you and everyone else safe and well.”
“Well, you can stick that in your ear, soldier boy,” Henry exclaimed with rising temper, “I am going to work and
that is the end of matter.”
“Sir, it’s not that easy. We require daily contact with you until the two week period is completed, and if you
violate the order, you will receive a citation that will cost $500 per day.”
“Furthermore,” he explained, “if you were to test positive before the end of self-quarantine, you could be
criminally charged for intentionally spreading the coronavirus, and that could mean one year in jail.”
“Oh, and Mr. Kron? We will also need to know everyone you and your family have been in contact with during the
last 7 days.”
Henry’s heart sank. He knew this was the end of the line for him and his family. He was trapped. He had worked
so hard for so many years to get where he was, but this would be the final blow that killed it all.
He could seek low income housing, but the application line was a mile long because unemployment was so high.
Maybe they would just sell everything and start over somewhere else.
“More sleepless nights ahead,” he told Helen. Their daughters didn’t fully understand, but they knew their
parents were very upset. They all hugged, temporarily oblivious to COVID-19. At least they had each other. For
now…
Broward County Administrator Discussing Removing People From Family Homes for COVID-19
Quarantines
National File
In this clip, Broward County Administrator Bertha Henry discusses how the government
may remove sick people from their homes to quarantine them due to coronavirus.
In 1991, the Club published The First Global
Revolution. It analyses the problems of humanity, calling these collectively or in essence the 'problematique'. It
notes (laments) that, historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by enemies in common:
"The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome domestic failure
and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself - when things
become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face
an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the
traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those
whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so used to classifying its
neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and
public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new
weapons devised."
THE GLOBALISTSMOVE FROM THEIRALQAEDA
CREATION,TO FABRICATING HOMEGROWN DOMESTIC
TERROR
A failed attempt to recruit Aaron Russo resulted in recent
light being shed on the CFR...And The Fake War On Terror!
Several years
ago, after his popular video “Mad As Hell” was released and Aaron Russo began his campaign to become
Governor of Nevada, Russo was noticed by Nicholas Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney. Seeing
Russo’s passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the
elite’s CFR. Watch the full interview here: Reflections and
Warnings.
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And
The Fake War On Terror!
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And The Fake War On
Terrorism!