welcome
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NATONorth Atlantic Treaty Organization
Ever since its inception there have been those who have
warned that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, far from offering a simple "collective security" pact to ensure
the integrity of its member nations' borders, would in fact be used as an offensive tool of imperial adventurism
and conquest. Since the NATO-led Kosovo bombing campaign of 1999 at the very least, those fears have appeared more
and more justified.
NATO is the first attempt in history to establish an aggressive global military formation, one which currently includes a third of the nations of the world either as members or partners, has members and partners on five continents and has conducted active operations on four, with the potential to expand its reach into the remaining two where it has not yet officially intruded itself...As NATO continues to expand across the globe through a series of partnerships, initiatives and dialogues, what was once a collective security agreement is increasingly becoming a global military strike force capable of bombarding, invading and occupying countries anywhere in the world. http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/about/ http://www.voltairenet.org/auteur124551.html?lang=en
NATO as Global Imperial Army - Rick Rozoff on GRTV As NATO continues to expand across the globe through a series of partnerships, initiatives and dialogues, what was once a collective security agreement is increasingly becoming a global military strike force capable of bombarding, invading and occupying countries anywhere in the world. Through STOP Nato International, activists like Rick Rozoff are performing the thankless task of raising awareness of the growing threat to the world that NATO represents. Find out more about this important topic in this week's GRTV Feature Interview.
Terror in Central Asia: Nato's Great Game In this age of manufactured terror, one of the most vital regions on the global
chessboard is also an area that few in the West know anything about: Central Asia. This geostrategic and
resource-rich area on the doorstep of China and Russia finds itself in the middle of an all out terror campaign.
But, as key national intelligence whistleblowers are pointing out, these terrorists are working hand-in-glove with
NATO. This is
Terror in Central Asia: NATO’s Great Game
by James Corbett Ever since the staged false flag attacks of 9/11, the US government and its complicit corporate media have focused their attention on fighting the shadowy, all-pervasive, all-powerful, ill-defined and undefeatable “Al Qaeda” enemy that is supposedly menacing the US and its allies at home and abroad. The term “Al Qaeda” of course is merely a cipher for “excuse to invade.” In the case of Afghanistan, for instance, the US used the threat of Al Qaeda as the excuse for their 12 year long invasion and occupation of the country. In Libya and Syria, the US and its allies are supporting those same self-described Al Qaeda-affiliated fighters. The ruse has long since become obvious. Less obvious, then, because it has been taking place completely under the radar of media attention, is another front in the so-called war on terror: Central Asia and the Caucasus region. Encompassing the region surrounding the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, this area has long been identified as perhaps the most geostrategically vital part of the globe. It provides access to the exceptionally rich Caspian oil and gas deposits, hosts the “New Silk Road,” a vital trade route between China and Europe, and sits on the doorstep of China and Russia. And it just so happens to have a terrorist problem. At first blush, it may seem odd that in this “age of terror” the American population has been told so little about the growing terrorist insurgency in Central Asia and the Caucasus. But when examined in the light of regional geopolitics, this deafening silence makes perfect sense. Indications of how and why this region is so important come from numerous geostrategists, including Zbigniew Brzezinski, Obama’s acknowledged mentor and a key advisor to his administration. In his 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard, Brzezinski identified the Central Asian / Caucasus region as part of a larger area he called “The Eurasian Balkans.” The countries in this region, he wrote, are “of importance from the standpoint of security and historical ambitions to at least three of their most immediate and more powerful neighbors, namely, Russia, Turkey, and Iran, with China also signaling an increasing political interest in the region. But,” he continued, “the Eurasian Balkans are infinitely more important as a potential economic prize: an enormous concentration of natural gas and oil reserves is located in the region, in addition to important minerals, including gold.” Brzezinski knew very well what he was writing about. As National Security Advisor under President Carter, he had overseen Operation Cyclone, the US government’s since-declassified plan to arm, train and fund Islamic radicals in Pakistan and Afghanistan to draw the Soviet Union into a protracted war in the region. This, famously, led to the foundation of what became known as Al Qaeda in the 1980s, a point that Brzezinski has since admitted and even bragged about, claiming that the creation of a “few stirred up Muslims” helped to bring down the Soviet Union. It is no surprise, then, that Brzezinski went on to predict in his 1997 book that the first major war of the 21st century would take place in this region, which is exactly what happened with the NATO invasion of Afghanistan in 2001. And it is also no surprise that even NATO’s hand-picked Afghan President, Hamid Karzai, is now openly accusing the US of supporting the Taliban in the country to convince the public that they will need US protection after the planned troop withdrawal date in 2014. Global Research contributor and Stop NATO International Director Rick Rozoff appeared on the Boiling Frogs Post podcast in 2011 to discuss this region and the overlap between NATO’s strategic interests and Islamic extremism. It has long been understood that the terror operations in Chechnya and other key parts of the Central Asia and Caucasus region have been supported, funded and protected by NATO to help destabilize the region surrounding their main geopolitical rivals, Russia and China, in an operation very similar to Operation Cyclone in the 70s and 80s. This has, until now, remained mostly within the realm of speculation. But in a recent groundbreaking series of interviews on The Corbett Report, FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds has confirmed that this is, in fact, exactly what is happening. If it is true that the people perish for lack of knowledge, perhaps it is nowhere more true than in the phoney, NATO-created war of terror. Without the understanding provided by Edmonds and others in identifying the Central Asia / Caucasus terror campaign as a NATO proxy war, the entire concept of Islamic terrorism becomes inscrutable to geopolitical analysis. As this information will never be disseminated by the complicit corporate media, it is vitally important that the people take this task into their own hands by sharing this information with others and contributing to the analysis of the terror campaign being waged in the region. The seeds of the next great world conflict are being sowed in Central Asia, on the doorstep of Russia and China, and regardless of whether or not this conflict, too, is being manipulated and managed behind the scenes, the lives of countless millions hang in the balance of the specter of that all-out war. Only an understanding of NATO’s active complicity in fostering and protecting these Muslim extremists can help break the tool of propaganda by which they will try to convince their population to acquiesce to such a war.
Rick Rozoff Calls Out the NATO Warmongers - Interview 881 Published on May 9, 2014 As Ukraine remains on a knife-edge of military tension, the NATO forces continue their Eastern European expansion and military provocations. In this must-listen interview, Rick Rozoff of Stop NATO International breaks down the history of NATO's global partnership program, its decades-long build-up in Eastern Europe, the people and organizations in whom the fate of the world is increasingly hanging in the balance, and the small glimmer of hope that an informed, galvanized public can derail this headlong rush to war. Sources: http://www.corbettreport.com/intervie... Support the Corbett Report:
The Last American Vagabond | First published at 19:36 UTC on February 15th, 2020. This is an excerpt of The Daily Wrap Up 2/14. Full Episode Can Be Seen Here: Get a TLAV "Question Everything" T-Shirt or Sticker at: Try The SuperChat Alternative Where YouTube Does Not Get A Cut: Like What You See? Help Us Stay People Funded:
US NATO War Agenda LINK TO THE PLAYLIST: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSa4W5DrKqc&list=PLDADbGYMIBhEs-aQQWBrCzXsma1tv9qC6
The Crime Of Aggression: Condemned By The Law Of Nature And Nature’s God The Crime of Aggression is the most serious crime a nation can commit. The condemnation of
this crime is rooted in both Natural and Biblical Law. The preparation for committing this crime almost caused
David his kingdom. In judgment upon David for planning this crime, God destroyed tens of thousands of David's
fighting men,
In this DVD, Dr. Baldwin explains this almost forgotten and extremely important
doctrine.
LINKS: Asleep at the Switch | Morality and Politics
WAR IS A RACKET
From a Veteran: Why YOU Should NOT Join The Military
Hrodebert tjern My own reasons behind why you should NOT join the military. My Views do not represent any group and are solely my own from experience and understanding of world events. I no longer serve the Military and I am no longer loyal to my government. I am not a "Pacifist" I merely believe our Young people should not be involved in wars that only benefit a few filthy rotten individuals. If you like, like - if you dislike, dislike - if you want to see more or have any questions let
me know, Most of all thanks for watching and always remember; PEACE IS PATRIOTIC Links: Pawns On The Chessboard , MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX , SYRIA , NATO , WE WHO DARE SAY NO TO WAR! , FALSE LEFT/RIGHT PARADIGM , U.S. Military Killing Its Own Troops! , Obama Orders Children Murdered!!
INTERVIEW: Dilyana Gaytandzhieva reveals US arms trafficking to ISIS September 12, 2019 By
During EP 294 of the SUNDAY WIRE show, host Patrick Henningsen spoke with Bulgarian investigative journalist Dilyana Gaytandzhieva, to discuss her latest ground-breaking investigation which reveals illegal US Department of Defense operation to traffic weapons clear into 2018-2019 – and into the hands of ISIS terrorists in Yemen and Syria. The details in this story leave no doubt as to the scale and severity of this illegal operation which contravenes US, EU and international law. For more information on this story, visit Arms Watch: READ MORE ISIS NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire ISIS Files Links: YEMEN | SYRIA | WAR ON TERROR IS A FRAUD | MILITARY
INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX | Pawns On The Chessboard |
Links: YEMEN | SYRIA | WAR ON TERROR IS A FRAUD | MILITARY
INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX | Pawns On The Chessboard |
"What do I think this is going to lead to? Well, now this is going to give Trump the excuse for not leaving Syria in spite of the fact that most of ISIS has been relegated to pockets in the desert and there is no reason for the US troops to be there. In fact two of them were killed recently, so now this chemical attack is going to provide the perfect excuse to stay in Syria for longer. Is it going to lead to a wider regional war?…Possibly. Anything can happen at this point because it’s very easy to spark a world war if Russia feels that it’s being threatened it might attack. …Well basically the way you have to see it is that France, Turkey, and the US are a bunch of vultures that are trying to pick off the corpse of what they believe to be a dead Syria. They are trying to basically divide the areas of control. France had its eyes on Manbij and turkey has its eyes on Manbij, cause they have this deal they want to make with the US that only everything east of the Euphrates belongs to their Kurdish proxies, and everything west of the Euphrates in the north of Syria is supposed to belong to Turkey. And France is kind of trying to carve out its own chunk. Of course at the end of the day Syria is alive. The military is strong. And the Syrian president has said that the entirety of Syria is going to be liberated. So the idea that any of those forces are going to stay and takeover a piece of Syria is a pipe dream. And it will lead to death and WAR and destruction. Already two US troops have been killed…this is sadly you know only the beginning and for what reason?…For Syrian oil? The US has plenty of oil. It’s not about wanting more oil. It’s about making sure that Syria can’t control and use its oil to rebuild because that’s going to threaten Israel. At the end of the day, this is really just about Israel, and protecting Israeli interests." -- Maram Susli, aka Mimi al-Laham, aka Syrian Girl --
Link: Trump Openly Funds Terrorists
German Minister Wants 40k NATO Troops To Occupy Syria, Using "Responsibility To Protect" Doctrine
This is an excerpt of The Daily Wrap Up 10/24. Full Episode Can Be Seen Here: Get a TLAV "Question Everything" T-Shirt or Sticker at: LINKS: YEMEN | Afghanistan | SYRIA - Palestine | IRAQ | The United Nations
Pastor Chuck Baldwin Counters Donald Trump's "Deal Of The
Century" LibertyFellowshipMT | Feb 18, 2020 This video is a brief response by Pastor Chuck Baldwin to a reader who, after reading Dr. Baldwin's national column entitled "Trump's Deal With The Devil," sarcastically asked him to propose his own Middle East peace plan if he didn't like Trump's plan.
(Excerpt) U.S. Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler (1881—1940) — a Congressional Medal of Honor winner who could never be accused of being a pacifist and the author of : War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses. I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then we’ll fight. The trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6 percent over here, then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100 percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag. I wouldn’t go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket. It may seem odd for me, a military man, to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent 33 years and 4 months in active service as a member of our country’s most agile military force — the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from second lieutenant to Major General. And during that period I spent most of my time being a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism. Butler also recognized the mental effect of military service: Like all members of the military profession I never had an original thought until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups.
The Corbett Report First published at 13:16 UTC on January 22nd, 2020 SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=34783 Have you heard of Major General Smedley Butler? If not, you might want to ask yourself why that is. As one of the most highly decorated Marines in the history of the US Marine Corps and as a passionate and eloquent speaker about the racket that is war, Smedley Butler deserves to be a household name. Find out more in today's edition of Questions For Corbett.
"I
wouldn't go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers.
There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of
Rights. WAR IS A RACKET
By Israel Shahak and Prof Michel Chossudovsky Introduction The following document pertaining to the formation of “Greater Israel” constitutes the cornerstone of powerful Zionist factions within the current Netanyahu government, the Likud party, as well as within the Israeli military and intelligence establishment. (article first published by Global Research on April 29, 2013).
Trump’s “Deal of the Century” is supportive of the “Greater Israel” project. It consists in the derogation of Palestinian’s “the right of return” by “naturalizing them as citizens of Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, and elsewhere regionally where they reside”. Bear in mind: The Greater Israel design is not strictly a Zionist Project for the Middle East, it is an integral part of US foreign policy, its strategic objective is extend US hegemony as well as fracture and balkanize the Middle East. Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital is intended to trigger political instability throughout the region. According to the founding father of Zionism Theodore Herzl, “the area of the Jewish State stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.” According to Rabbi Fischmann, “The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.”
Nuclear War 2016: Putin's Dire Warning Published on Aug 11, 2016 Vladimir Putin has a warning for the rest of the world as the globalists push us closer and closer to nuclear war.
Ticking Time Bomb: Media Hypes Nuclear Threat in Turkey to Justify Action Published on Aug 17, 2016 In this episode of Newsbud’s Spotlight with Sibel & Spiro, we examine the motives of the recent hype and fear mongering by the media and think tanks concerning the US nuclear weapons currently stored at NATO’s Incirlik Air Base in Turkey. It appears the Nukes are being used as a pretext for justification for US action in Turkey, reminiscent of the media's false reporting of the WMD’s in Iraq and other fabricated stories to justify wars. Show Notes
Link : WikiLeaks, Hillary-Gulen Intimate Ties & How Clintons Gave Birth to Mullah Gulen’s Terrorist Network
State Dept. Threatens Terror Attacks In Russia If Moscow Keeps Fighting ISIS
Published on Sep 30, 2016 In extraordinary comments that have gone virtually unnoticed by the media, U.S. State Department
spokesman John Kirby threatened Moscow with terror attacks in Russian cities and even shoot downs of
What's REALLY Happening in Syria Published on Sep 28, 2016 The U.S. is HELPING ISIS and moving closer to war with Russia. Subscribe to Syrian Girl's channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/SyrianGi... | Follow her on Twitter:https://twitter.com/Partisangirl Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watso...
EMERGENCY! War Declared on Russia By Soros Controlled U.S.
Published on Oct 16, 2016 The US and Russia have all but declared war. Alex breaks down how this manufactured conflict is being used to take over what remains of the United States by the globalists. Links: INTERNET FALSE FLAGS | The New World Order | The Criminal Clintons
URGENT: MSM Syria Lies NEED TO BE EXPOSED...Before It's Too Late Published on Oct 9, 2016 SHOW NOTES: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=20107 The world once again finds itself hurtling to the brink of war, and once again the establishment mouthpiece puppet propaganda media is leading the charge. This time around their lies defy description. In the sick world of the would-be warmongers, child beheading terrorist scum are now the heroes. The blood of the innocents that spill from here on in covers the hands of the mainstream media propagandists.
SHOW NOTES: Syria conflict: Boy beheaded by rebels ‘was fighter’ Daily Press Briefing – August 3, 2016 (video) Daily Press Briefing – August 3, 2016 (transcript) Original (now deleted) Channel 4 report Channel 4’s Deleted Video Normalising Child Beheaders, al-Zenki England’s Channel 4 News featuring “moderate” war criminals We Have to Talk About the Boy in the Ambulance… Christoph Germann – Aleppo in a nutshell WW3? How the Ceasefire in #Syria broke down CrossTalk: White Helmets, Really? George Soros blasts Putin for Russian actions in Syria Russia Warns US Airstrikes On Syrian Army Would Lead To War, Air Defenses Are Active Russia Threatens To Shoot Down US Jets Wicker Outlines Administration’s Failures in Syria Only SEVEN people BTL support Guardian’s fact-free White Helmets editorial
"The most effectual engines for pacifying a nation are the public papers... A despotic government always keeps a kind of standing army of newswriters who, without any regard to truth or to what should be like truth, invent and put into the papers whatever might serve the ministers. This suffices with the mass of the people who have no means of distinguishing the false from the true paragraphs of a newspaper."-- Thomas Jefferson to G. K. van Hogendorp, Oct. 13, 1785. --LINKS: Media Controllers | Media Controllers2 | Media Controllers3
http://www.amazon.com/The-New-Media-Monopoly-Completely/dp/0807061875 When the first edition of The Media Monopoly was published in 1983, critics called Ben Bagdikian's warnings about the chilling effects of corporate ownership and mass advertising on the nation's news "alarmist." Since then, the number of corporations controlling most of America's daily newspapers, magazines, radio and television stations, book publishers, and movie companies has dwindled from fifty to ten to five.
Published on Apr 22, 2015 After the CIA recruits a 15 year old girl to lie to congress about baby killers from Iraq, celebrities across the U.S. rally for war. Meanwhile CNN launches a collection of fake news broadcasts and Whitney Houston wows the nation with her Super Bowl performance of the National Anthem.
Globalist Wars Killed Over 2 Million
People in Last Decade
by Kurt Nimmo | Infowars.com | March 26, 2015
U.S. wars initiated at the behest of a global financial elite killed more than 2,000,000 people, according to a report published by Physicians for Social Responsibility. Body Count: Casualty Figures after 10 Years of the “War on Terror” summarizes:
The average American, the report notes, is a victim of a massive propaganda campaign designed to propagate lies about these undeclared an illegal wars. “A poll carried out by the Associated Press (AP) two years ago found that, on average, US citizens believe that only 9,900 Iraqis were killed during the occupation,” the reports reads. Physicians for Social Responsibility places the blame for this on the corporate media. The NGO, however, does not indicate why the government and the establishment media deliberately downplay the death and destruction inflicted by the Bush and Obama administrations, although they say the current “state of affairs could be very different if the public were made aware that the actual number is likely to be more than a hundred times higher” than the numbers reported by The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, Fox, et al. “The report is sure to fuel outrage over one of the most controversial wars in US history, one in which ‘the original pretexts for going to war quickly turned out to be spurious, and from then on only the ‘liberation of the country from a violent dictatorship’ and the “democratization” and “stabilization” of Iraq remained as justification for the war and occupation,’” reports Sputnik, a news agency owned by the Russian government. It may fuel outrage in Europe and Russia, where the media covers studies indicting the U.S. government and its foreign policy, but is unlikely to do likewise in the United States. Growing Support in U.S. For Unlimited WarIn February the Pew Research Center reported growing support for the ISIS war. “The public has grown more supportive of the U.S. fight against ISIS, as about twice as many approve (63%) as disapprove (30%) of the military campaign against the Islamic militant group in Iraq and Syria. Last October, 57% approved and 33% disapproved,” Pew reported. Earlier this month a Quinnipiac poll showed American voters strongly in support of sending ground troops to battle ISIS by more than a 2-to-1 margin. In February a proposed a new Authorization for the Use of Military Force was left deliberately undefined “because we believe it’s important that there aren’t overly burdensome constraints that are placed on the commander in chief,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said. Critics interpret this to mean the executive branch of the government wants to expand the reach of the imperial presidency and allow it to wage war against ill-defined enemies anywhere in the world. Additionally, the administration believes the deliberately ambiguous AUMF will bring lawmakers together in a bipartisan coalition calling for a war against the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq without restraint, including the use of ground troops. LINKS:
Published on Apr 22, 2015 Only 6 corporations control what most of you see, hear and read every single day.
Related: THESE 10 CORPORATIONS CONTROL ALMOST EVERYTHING YOU BUY - http://www.infowars.com/these-10-corp... 7 THINGS ABOUT THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA THAT THEY DO NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW - http://www.infowars.com/7-things-abou... WHO RUNS THE WORLD? SOLID PROOF THAT A CORE GROUP OF WEALTHY ELITISTS IS PULLING THE STRINGS - http://www.infowars.com/who-runs-the-... Central Control of Information and The Death of Journalism - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhlSw...
DIVIDE AND CONQUER
Balkanization : 1. To divide (a country, territory, etc.) into small, quarrelsome, ineffectual states. 2. To divide (groups, areas, etc.) into
contending and usually ineffectual faction:
A divide and conquer strategy, also known as “divide and rule strategy” is often applied in the arenas of politics and sociology. In this strategy, one power breaks another power into smaller, more manageable pieces, and then takes control of those pieces one by one. It generally takes a very strong power to implement such a strategy. In order to successfully break up another power or government, the conqueror must have access to strong political, military, and economic machines. Furthermore, in order to maintain power and influence, large governments will often work to keep smaller powers and governments from uniting. In fact, this use of the principles within the divide and conquer strategy is most common. It is much easier to prevent small powers from linking forces than to break them apart once they have aligned. Leaders who use a divide and conquer strategy may encourage or foster feuds between smaller powers. This kind of political maneuvering requires a great understanding of the people who are being manipulated. In order to foster feuds, for example, one must understand the political and social histories of the parties intended to take part in the feuds. LINK: DIVIDE AND CONQUER
Brzezinski knew very well what he was writing about. As National Security Advisor under President Carter, he had overseen Operation Cyclone, the US government’s since-declassified plan to arm, train and fund Islamic radicals in Pakistan and Afghanistan to draw the Soviet Union into a protracted war in the region. This, famously, led to the foundation of what became known as Al Qaeda in the 1980s, a point that Brzezinski has sinceadmitted and even bragged about, claiming that the creation of a “few stirred up Muslims” helped to bring down the Soviet Union.
Meet: Zbigniew Brzezinski
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Operation Cyclone This installment of the documentary goes into Zbigniew Brzezinski, Operation Cyclone, the
ISI-CIA-MAK-US government funding circle and CIA connections to Osama Bin Laden. For more information about this
documentary,
Map of proposed pipeline routes from Chapter 5 (page 146) of Zbigniew Brzezinski's 1997 book "The Grand Chessboard". To view it on a larger scale click here
BOMBSHELL Documents Expose The Secret Lie That Started the Afghan War corbettreport TRANSCRIPT AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=27801 How did the war in Afghanistan start? And how did NATO become involved in this conflict? These details are never discussed because they have for nearly two decades, been hidden behind a shroud of secrecy. But now, after nearly two decades of lies, the remarkable truth about the secret documents that helped launch the Afghan war can finally be revealed. This is the story of The Secret Lie That Started the Afghan War. MORE HERE: Troops Protect Government Drug Dealing
Obama’s Former Foreign Policy Adviser Said – In 1997 – that
the U.S. Had to Gain Washington’s Blog The Battle for Ukraine Was Planned in 1997 … Or Earlier Neoconservatives planned regime change throughout the Middle East and North Africa 20 years ago. Robert Parry correctly points out that the Neocons have successfully “weathered the storm” of disdain after their Iraq war fiasco.But the truth is that Obama has long done his best to try to implement those Neocon plans. Similarly, ever since the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the U.S. has pursued a strategy of encircling Russia, just as it has with other perceived enemies like China and Iran.
Regarding Ukraine, Brzezinski said (hat tip Chris Ernesto):
And now Obama is pushing us into a confrontation with Russia over Ukraine and the Crimea. As Ernesto notes:
In other words, Obama is following the same old playbook that the Neocons have been pushing for more than a decade. This article was posted: Sunday, March 16, 2014 at 8:44 am
LINK: Pawns On The Chessboard
Bandar Bush and the Syrian Subversion
CONTINUE WATCHING: http://ur1.ca/fd20a
Soros Admits Responsibility for Coup
and Mass Murder Color revolution collaboration began soon after
by Kurt Nimmo | Infowars.com | May 27, 2014 George Soros told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria over the weekend he is responsible for establishing a foundation in Ukraine that ultimately contributed to the overthrow of the country’s elected leader and the installation of a junta handpicked by the State Department. “First on Ukraine, one of the things that many people recognized about you was that you during the revolutions of 1989 funded a lot of dissident activities, civil society groups in eastern Europe and Poland, the Czech Republic. Are you doing similar things in Ukraine?” Zakaria asked Soros. “Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia. And the foundation has been functioning ever since and played an important part in events now,” Soros responded. It is well-known, although forbidden for the establishment media to mention, that Soros worked closely with USAID, the National Endowment for Democracy (now doing work formerly assigned to the CIA), the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, the Freedom House, and the Albert Einstein Institute to initiate a series of color revolutions in Eastern Europe and Central Asia following the engineered collapse of the Soviet Union. “Many of the participants in Kiev’s ‘EuroMaidan’ demonstrations were members of Soros-funded NGOs and/or were trained by the same NGOs in the many workshops and conferences sponsored by Soros’ International Renaissance Foundation (IRF), and his various Open Society institutes and foundations. The IRF, founded and funded by Soros, boasts that it has given ‘more than any other donor organization’ to ‘democratic transformation’ of Ukraine,” writes William F. Jasper. This transformation led to fascist ultra-nationalists controlling Ukraine’s security services. In April it was announced Andriy Parubiy and other coup leaders were working with the FBI and CIA to defeat and murder separatists opposed to the junta government installed by Victoria Nuland and the State Department. Parubiy is the founder of a national socialist party in Ukraine and currently the boss of the country’s National Security and Defense Council. Now that the billionaire “chocolate king” Petro Poroshenko is president of Ukraine, the effort to wipe out all opposition in eastern Ukraine will pick up steam. Poroshenko is a near perfect choice for the globalists and EU apparatchiks. He sat on the Council of the National Bank of Ukraine and collaborated with the IMF, Wall Street and the European Commission. Poroshenko and the February coup leaders are now killing civilians in Donetsk as the effort continues to dislodge and eradicate “pro-Russian militants” and “terrorists,” i.e., armed resistance fighters going up against Right Sector enforcers possibly accompanied by American mercenaries with the help of the CIA. Civilians are also victims in “rebel”-held Slovyansk and neighboring Kramatorsk as retaliation against resistance to the junta in Kyiv intensifies. The military response with its overly fascist character, including the terrorist torching of a trade union building in Odessa by “pro-regime rioters” (i.e., Right Sector paramilitaries), can be directly attributed to the activism of George Soros and the hands-on approach of the U.S. State Department, various NGOs (which are, in fact, government and Wall Street fronts), and USAID, NED, and the malattributed “Freedom House,” etc. Following the murder and expulsion of those opposed to the IMF lording over the government and the people of Ukraine, Russia can expect further provocation, especially now that it has stepped away from supporting the resistance. The financial elite and their EU collaborators are determined to diminish and ultimately eliminate any challenge by Russia and the BRICS as these countries move to counter the neoliberal financial agenda. “The buildup of NATO air and ground forces along the borders of Russia in eastern Europe and President Barack Obama’s American power-influencing trip to Asia have a single purpose,” Wayne Madsen wrote earlier this month. “The seen and unseen forces who dictate policy to their political puppets in Washington, London, Paris, Brussels, Berlin, and other vassal capital cities have decided to smash BRICS – the emergent financial power bloc encompassing Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.”
MORE: WE WHO DARE SAY NO TO WAR!
Thermonuclear Infowars.com Alex discusses the rampant effort to de-educate the general populace, the fact that most people do not know the history of the Crimea/Ukraine region.
This article was posted: Monday, March 17, 2014 at 6:37 am Tags: war
LINK: RAND Corporation
The BFP Roundtable Takes on
In this edition of the BFP Roundtable, Peter B. Collins, Guillermo Jimenez, James Corbett
and Sibel Edmonds discuss the latest moves in the formation of a so-called "new cold war" between NATO and Russia.
We also tackle Seymour Hersh and his recent article in the London Review of Books examining Turkish involvement
in
Criminal governments armed Isis/Al-qaeda with weapons, including estimated 20,000
missiles LINKS: Obama Now Global Head of Alqaeda! Troops Protect Government Drug Dealing U.S. Military Killing Its Own Troops!
INTERVIEW: Dilyana Gaytandzhieva reveals US arms trafficking to ISIS September 12, 2019 By
During EP 294 of the SUNDAY WIRE show, host Patrick Henningsen spoke with Bulgarian investigative journalist Dilyana Gaytandzhieva, to discuss her latest ground-breaking investigation which reveals illegal US Department of Defense operation to traffic weapons clear into 2018-2019 – and into the hands of ISIS terrorists in Yemen and Syria. The details in this story leave no doubt as to the scale and severity of this illegal operation which contravenes US, EU and international law. For more information on this story, visit Arms Watch: READ MORE ISIS NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire ISIS Files Links: YEMEN | SYRIA | WAR ON TERROR IS A FRAUD | MILITARY
INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX | Pawns On The Chessboard |
Al-qaeda Assists In The
Destabilization Of Libya NATO-backed Libyan rebels are rounding up thousands of innocent black migrants and taking them to prison camps as part of mass reprisals that include reports of indiscriminate killings, mistreatment and torture, as the "humanitarian" veneer of the west's military intervention quickly crumbles.
The Covert Origins of ISIS is a product of U.S. government’s
by SCGNews | August 30, 2014 The Islamic militant group ISIS, formerly known as Al-Qaeda in Iraq, and recently rebranded as the so called Islamic State, is the stuff of nightmares. They are ruthless, fanatical, killers, on a mission, and that mission is to wipe out anyone and everyone, from any religion or belief system and to impose Shari’ah law. The mass executions, beheadings and even crucifixions that they are committing as they work towards this goal are flaunted like badges of pride, video taped and uploaded for the whole world to see. This is the new face of evil.
This story makes more sense if we start in the middle, so we’ll begin with the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011. The Libyan revolution was Obama’s first major foreign intervention. It was portrayed as an extension of the Arab Spring, and NATO involvement was framed in humanitarian terms. The fact that the CIA was actively working to help the Libyan rebels topple Gaddafi was no secret, nor were the airstrikes that Obama ordered against the Libyan government. However, little was said about the identity or the ideological leanings of these Libyan rebels. Not surprising, considering the fact that the leader of the Libyan rebels later admitted that his fighters included Al-Qaeda linked jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq. These jihadist militants from Iraq were part of what national security analysts commonly referred to as Al-Qaeda in Iraq. Remember Al-Qaeda in Iraq was ISIS before it was rebranded. (Article Continues on next page)
Al Qaeda's Dark Secret Exposed
In a special video address, Alex Jones terms the al Qaeda intelligence operation a 'swiss army
knife' for destabilization. Simply put, it is a tool to foment crisis that allows the globalists to offer up a
solution.The shadowy enemy supposedly run by Osama bin Laden and top jihadists like Anwar al-Awlaki is really
run out of U.S. foreign policy and the Pentagon. It is perhaps government's greatest hoax... and one of the
oldest tricks in the book.
The Globalists' Swiss Army
Knife for Destabilization
****THE PROCESSES OF DESTABILIZATION**** SIMPLY EXPLAINED
From time immemorial, royalty, priest classes and other self-appointed elites have used any means necessary to dominate the population and keep it divided amongst itself. Alex Jones uses the games of chess, risk and monopoly to explain the classic modes of control used by rulers, representing classic warfare between two factions, world warfare with a complex conflict, and, of course, economic warfare.
Full Spectrum Evil Secrets of Global Domination
From time immemorial, royalty, priest
classes and other self-appointed elites have used any means necessary to dominate the population and keep it
divided amongst itself. Alex Jones uses the games of chess, risk and monopoly to explain the classic modes of
control used by rulers, representing classic warfare between two factions, world warfare with a complex conflict,
and, of course, economic warfare. LINKS: Obama Now Global Head of Alqaeda!
DON'T BE A PAWN IN THEIR NWO GAME UNDERSTAND WHAT'S GOING ON - RESEARCH : USMC MAJOR GENERAL SMEDLEY BUTLER
LINK: MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
Troops Protect Government Drug Dealing!
The US military is in Afghanistan for two reasons. First to restore and control the world’s largest supply of opium for the world heroin markets and to use the drugs as a geopolitical weapon against opponents, especially Russia. That control of the Afghan drug market is essential for the liquidity of the bankrupt and corrupt Wall Street financial mafia. ...The second reason the US military remains in Afghanistan long after the world has forgotten even who the mysterious Osama bin Laden and his alleged Al Qaeda terrorist organization is or even if they exist, is as a pretext to build a permanent US military strike force with a series of permanent US airbases across Afghanistan. The aim of those bases is not to eradicate any Al Qaeda cells that may have survived in the caves of Tora Bora, or to eradicate a mythical “Taliban” which at this point according to eyewitness reports is made up overwhelmingly of local ordinary Afghanis fighting to rid their land once more of occupier armies as they did in the 1980’s against the Russians.
LINK: Troops Protect Government Drug Dealing
LINK: FALSE LEFT/RIGHT PARADIGM
War Has Been A Racket For Quite Some Time...
The Best Enemies An Interview with Professor Antony C. Sutton
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED READING HERE: https://archive.org/details/Sutton--Western-Technology-1917-1930
The business of lending blood money is one of the most thoroughly sordid, cold blooded, and criminal acts that were ever carried on, to any considerable extent, amongst human beings. It is like lending money to slave traders, or to common robbers and pirates, to be repaid out of their plunder. And theman who loans money to governments, so called, for the purpose of enabling the latter to rob, enslave and murder their own people, are among the greatest villains that the world has ever seen. With mountains of documentation, mostly from government and corporate sources, Sutton shows that Soviet military technology is heavily dependent on U.S. and allied gifts, "peaceful trade" and exchange programs. We've built for, sold, traded, or given outright to the Communists everything from copper wiring and military trucks to tank technology, missile guidance technology, and computers - even the Space Shuttle. Background on Professor Antony C. Sutton
Professor Richard Pipes of Harvard said in his book, Survival Is Not Enough: Soviet Realities and America's Future (Simon & Schuster;1984): "In his three-volume detailed account of Soviet Purchases of Western Equipment and Technology . . . [Antony] Sutton comes to conclusions that are uncomfortable for many businessmen and economists. For this reason his work tends to be either dismissed out of hand as 'extreme' or, more often, simply ignored." The report was too much and Sutton's career as a well-paid member of the academic establishment was under attack and he was told that he "would not survive". His work led him to more questions than answers. "Why had the US built-up it's enemy? Why did the US build-up the Soviet Union, while we also transferred technology to Hitler's Germany? Why does Washington want to conceal these facts?" Sutton, following his leads, proceeded to research and write his three outstanding books on Wall Street, FDR, the Rise of Hitler, and The Bolshevik Revolution. Then, someone sent Antony a membership list of Skull and Bones and "a picture jumped out". And what a picture! A multigenerational foreign-based secret society with fingers in all kinds of pies and roots going back to 'Illuminati' influences in 1830's Germany. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED READING HERE : https://archive.org/details/Sutton--Western-Technology-1917-1930 http://www.antonysutton.com/suttonbibliography.html
All Wars Are Bankers' Wars
Written and spoken by Michael Rivero. The
written version is here: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTI...
LINKS:
Hidden Motives Behind the Ukraine-Russia Conflict The untold story behind the crisis is that this is an energy tug of war being fought
between
September 16, 2008 http://www.lewrockwell.com/2008/09/ron-shirtz/abolish-nato/
Following WWII, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Treaty (NATO), was established in 1949 for the collective defense — Wait, hold on a minute. Isn't collective a term the Communists use? More on that later. Anyway, NATO was established for the purpose, as NATO's first secretary General Lord Ismay summed up, "to keep the Russians out, the American's in, and the Germans down." That the USSR posed a serious threat to the security of Western Europe, there was no question — That Europe wanted America to become point man for their defense against the USSR was merely a continuation of Churchill's political machinations to draw an isolationist US into WWII and European politics. Add two world wars with Germany, and Europe gets an additional bonus by having the US stationed in bases in Germany to disabuse them of any ideas of having another go at conquering the continent. Through the 1950's up to the late 1980's, NATO and the USSR stood glaring at each other across the Iron Curtain. Dreams of an epic armor battle at the Fulda Gap between the Warsaw Pact and NATO forces that would make the tank battle at Kursk look like a piker filled the heads of armchair wargamers and inspired books like Red Storm Rising. Then, gosh darn it, Gorbachev's Glasnost herald a new era of open politics in Soviet Union. Some electrician named Lech Walesa was giving the Communist party in Poland fits with organized strikes. Suddenly in 1989, East Germany takes down the Iron Curtain. The cold war thaws into a hopeful spring. What was NATO going to do with all those tanks, planes, and troops? Worse, what were the generals going to do to keep their jobs? No enemies to fight, and the politicians were promising a peace dividend to citizens by closing military bases. The common quip of the Berliners in the last days of WWII of “Enjoy the war. The peace will be terrible” now seemed a reality for poor NATO. Without a combat command, military career advancement would come to a standstill. Without the need to maintain ongoing weapon superiority, the military industry would lay off employees. There goes the economy. Desperate, NATO takes a cue from the movie of Canadian Bacon, and becomes involved in the ethnic strife in Yugoslavia between the Croats and the Serbs to look useful and from being disbanded. It becomes the strong arm of the UN, enforcing that august body's no-fly zone mandate, as well as the UN's arms and economic sanctions. NATO continued by initiating air strikes in Bosnia, and deploying a peacekeeping force on the ground. NATO finds a use for its leftover cold war ordinance collecting dust by mounting an 11-week bombing campaign. NATO cleverly names the bombing sorties with various titles such as Operation Deliberate Force, so as to assure people that the bombs were not dropped by accident, or Operation Allied Force, in case someone doesn't already know that NATO is a collective (there's that Communist word again!) of various nations working together to enforce the peace by killing people. What is strange about the working relationship of NATO and UN is that the former resists attempts to by the latter to have the final word regarding its military actions. The UN would say, "Don't bomb, we have things under control," and NATO would reply. "Yes we will bomb, just to make sure." I guess when you have one organization whose mission is to preserve peace, and another whose job is to break things to protect democracy, you are bound to have some philosophical differences. As the Good Book says, "A house divided against itself cannot stand." How any nation can belong to both organizations, and yet come to cross-proposes deciding if and who should be bombed, is beyond me. Sounds like one of them is unnecessary and is getting in the way of the other. Better yet, to be on the safe side, it might be best to get rid of both. But that's just my opinion. But local European ethnic conflicts were not enough to justify the overhead cost of a coalition as large as NATO. Fortunately, 9/11 happened just in the nick of time. In 2003 NATO was reorganized so as to take over the duties International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan. This would set the precedent for NATO to entertain missions outside its North Atlantic backyard. Plenty of opportunities to keep business as usual for NATO. But while NATO enjoys a good brush war like anyone else to keep the military industrial complex economy running, the real action is found in the defensive missiles gig. Never mind there is yet a practical missile made that can hit the broadside of the proverbial barn, much less a ICBM coming in from the stratosphere, this is were the big money is. Plus, it has the biggest boogieman fear component to inspire the civilians to work harder to pay taxes. Scaring citizens with images of mechanized armies invading your neighborhood is so passé — To really play on the sheeple's paranoia, talk about the possibility of rogue missile attacks launched from middle-eastern countries such as Iran. Even hint darkly about a resurgent Russia, with Putin desiring to push the big red button. Never mind that Putin enjoys Russia's prosperity with capitalism with Europe as customer. He wouldn't dream of killing the goose that lays the golden eggs by nuking western Europe into glass parking lot. Bad for business, you know. NATO's reinventing itself is so successful that many of the former Soviet Bloc countries are applying for membership. Little Georgia has little to offer to NATO, other than to instigate hostilities with neighboring Ossetia. No doubt NATO was upset that Georgia did not wait after it was initiated into its club, so NATO could get into the act and justify its military budget by using mean old Russia as an excuse. Besides, how dare the Russians come to the aid of Ossetia when it was attacked by Georgia! That's NATO job! If its one thing an organization hates, it's someone else cutting in on the action. In a recent interview by ABC's Charles Gibson, Sarah Palin condemned Russia's invasion of Georgia as quote-unquote, "unprovoked." Which of course, is a lie. Palin favors the inclusion of both Georgia and the Ukraine into NATO because they had demonstrated actions as being "democratic" When Gibson asked: "and under the NATO treaty, wouldn't we then have to go to war if Russia went into Georgia?" She replied "Perhaps." Which is another way of saying all options are on the table. Her fervor revealed later in the interview to come to the aid of "smaller democratic countries that are invaded by a larger power" would have sounded noble if we were not already a larger power that had invaded a smaller country that had done nothing against us. But the difference of course, is Iraq is not a "democratic" one, so the US is excused where Russia is not. Palin stresses the importance of not reverting back to a cold war status, yet advocates economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure against Russia that are the equivalent of creating one. NATO could not have asked for a better lobbyist that Palin to cheerlead for its continued existence Palin and others ongoing support to a collectivist (there its that word again!) defense organization as NATO reminds me of new inmates who are obliged to join a gang in order to survive in prison — Doesn't matter what crimes you or they have committed, the thing is the colors you wear define who are your friends, and who are your enemies. So much for the rugged individualism that once was the hallmark of America's legacy. I find it ironic that the people who are opposed with our association in the UN are just as tenacious in insisting that we must stay in NATO. That we must honor our commitments and treaties by continuing to belong to a collective defense organization. All for the sake of defending democracy, which is a method of government, not a moral definition of who is the good guy, and who is the villian. Many still think that poor Europe is too weak to defend itself should Russia aspire to conquer Western Europe. Never mind that with the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia does not have near the manpower and hardware it formerly had with the Warsaw Pact. Everyone is still thinking with a 1980's cold war mindset. Worse, these people cannot see that NATO is little different than the UN — except it does not use white-painted armored vehicles and blue helmets, and is more likely to shoot first and then ask questions later. America needs to get out of the NATO club and stop being a club for NATO. NATO's original purpose has been made obsolete by the fall of the USSR. It is a holdover of the same treaties, the "scrap of paper" signed by old men in Europe who offered their young people and treasure as collateral for the "honor" to defend each other's decadent empires. By contractual reflex France, Britain, and Russia were led into disastrous world war with Germany in 1914, over the assassination of an Austrian archduke by a radical Serb. After three years of callously spending the lives and limbs an entire generation of their best young men by sending them in frontal attacks against machine guns with bayonets, they looked to America for fresh cannon fodder to rescue them for their folly — and Wilson provided it in the name of "making democracy safe for the world." That any reprobate country can gain political legitimacy by declaring being a "democracy" and be admitted into the NATO club is akin to putting lipstick on a pig, if I may use a cliché that is presently in vogue. Spilling the blood of our soldiers and depleting our treasure in the defense such countries that wear such false garb is a sucker's game. America should follow the example of Groucho Marx, treating any club that would invite them as a member suspect, and not worth belonging to.
Ron Paul Rewind:
Written by Chris Rossini Contrary to how the mainstream media tries to portray the U.S. as an innocent bystander in Ukraine, the reality is that provocative meddling has been going on for a very long time.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this resolution calling for the further expansion of NATO to the borders of Russia. NATO is an organization whose purpose ended with the end of its Warsaw Pact adversary. When NATO struggled to define its future after the Cold War, it settled on attacking a sovereign state, Yugoslavia, which had neither invaded nor threatened any NATO member state. This current round of NATO expansion is a political reward to governments in Georgia and Ukraine that came to power as a result of US-supported revolutions, the so-called Orange Revolution and Rose Revolution. The governments that arose from these street protests were eager to please their US sponsor and the US, in turn, turned a blind eye to the numerous political and human rights abuses that took place under the new regimes. Thus the US policy of “exporting democracy” has only succeeding in exporting more misery to the countries it has targeted. NATO expansion only benefits the US military industrial complex, which stands to profit from expanded arms sales to new NATO members. The “modernization” of former Soviet militaries in Ukraine and Georgia will mean tens of millions in sales to US and European military contractors. The US taxpayer will be left holding the bill, as the US government will subsidize most of the transactions. Providing US military guarantees to Ukraine and Georgia can only further strain our military. This NATO expansion may well involve the US military in conflicts as unrelated to our national interest as the breakaway regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia in Georgia. The idea that American troops might be forced to fight and die to prevent a small section of Georgia from seceding is absurd and disturbing. Mr. Speaker, NATO should be disbanded, not expanded.
Ron Paul: "I rise in opposition to expanding NATO"
Published on Dec 18, 2012 11/7/2001, C-SPAN written text: http://paul.house.gov/index.php?optio...
Against NATO Expansion
by Rep. Ron Paul, MD April 6, 2004
Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this resolution. I do so because further expansion of NATO, an outdated alliance, is not in our national interest and may well constitute a threat to our national security in the future. More than 50 years ago the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was formed to defend Western Europe and the United States against attack from the communist nations of Eastern Europe. It was an alliance of sovereign nations bound together in common purpose — for mutual defense. The deterrence value of NATO helped kept the peace throughout the Cold War. In short, NATO achieved its stated mission. With the fall of the Soviet system and the accompanying disappearance of the threat of attack, in 1989—1991, NATO's reason to exist ceased. Unfortunately, as with most bureaucracies, the end of NATO's mission did not mean the end of NATO. Instead, heads of NATO member states gathered in 1999 desperately attempting to devise new missions for the outdated and adrift alliance. This is where NATO moved from being a defensive alliance respecting the sovereignty of its members to an offensive and interventionist organization, concerned now with "economic, social and political difficulties...ethnic and religious rivalries, territorial disputes, inadequate or failed efforts at reform, the abuse of human rights, and the dissolution of states," in the words of the Washington 1999 Summit. And we saw the fruits of this new NATO mission in the former Yugoslavia, where the US, through NATO, attacked a sovereign state that threatened neither the United States nor its own neighbors. In Yugoslavia, NATO abandoned the claim it once had to the moral high ground. The result of the illegal and immoral NATO intervention in the Balkans speaks for itself: NATO troops will occupy the Balkans for the foreseeable future. No peace has been attained, merely the cessation of hostilities and a permanent dependency on US foreign aid. The further expansion of NATO is in reality a cover for increased US interventionism in Europe and beyond. It will be a conduit for more unconstitutional US foreign aid and US interference in the internal politics of member nations, especially the new members from the former East. It will also mean more corporate welfare at home. As we know, NATO membership demands a minimum level of military spending of its member states. For NATO's new members, the burden of significantly increased military spending when there are no longer external threats is hard to meet. Unfortunately, this is where the US government steps in, offering aid and subsidized loans to these members so they can purchase more unneeded and unnecessary military equipment. In short, it is nothing more than corporate welfare for the US military industrial complex. The expansion of NATO to these seven countries, we have heard, will open them up to the further expansion of US military bases, right up to the border of the former Soviet Union. Does no one worry that this continued provocation of Russia might have negative effects in the future? Is it necessary? Further, this legislation encourages the accession of Albania, Macedonia, and Croatia — nations that not long ago were mired in civil and regional wars. The promise of US military assistance if any of these states are attacked is obviously a foolhardy one. What will the mutual defense obligations we are entering into mean if two Balkan NATO members begin hostilities against each other (again)? In conclusion, we should not be wasting US tax money and taking on more military obligations expanding NATO. The alliance is a relic of the Cold War, a hold-over from another time, an anachronism. It should be disbanded, the sooner the better.
"Serbia has not threatened us nor used any force - Classic Ron Paul - Uploaded on Feb 4, 2011 3/24/1999, C-SPAN written text: http://ronpaulquotes.com/chapters/199...
One World Government - Ron Paul - Published on Mar 24, 2012 2001- Ron Paul fights against expanding NATO and talks about how globalization and
During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing yesterday, Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey brazenly admitted that their authority comes not from the U.S. Constitution, but that the United States is subservient to and takes its marching orders from the United Nations and NATO, international bodies over which the American peoplehave no democratic influence. LINK: The United Nations
Coup D’etat: Pentagon & Obama Declare Congress Ceremonial Congressman Jones introduces bill that would subject
Paul Joseph Watson Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s testimony asserting that the United Nations and NATO have supreme authority over the actions of the United States military, words which effectively declare Congress a ceremonial relic, have prompted Congressman Walter Jones to introduce a resolution that re-affirms such behavior as an “impeachable high crime and misdemeanor” under the Constitution. During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing yesterday, Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey brazenly admitted that their authority comes not from the U.S. Constitution, but that the United States is subservient to and takes its marching orders from the United Nations and NATO, international bodies over which the American people have no democratic influence.
Obama Admin Cites 'Int'l Permission,' Not Congress, As 'Legal Basis' For Action In Syria
Panetta was asked by Senator Jeff Sessions, “We spend our time worrying about the U.N., the Arab League, NATO and too little time, in my opinion, worrying about the elected representatives of the United States. As you go forward, will you consult with the United States Congress?” The Defense Secretary responded “You know, our goal would be to seek international permission. And we would come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress.” Despite Sessions’ repeated efforts to get Panetta to acknowledge that the United States Congress is supreme to the likes of NATO and the UN, Panetta exalted the power of international bodies over the US legislative branch. “I’m really baffled by the idea that somehow an international assembly provides a legal basis for the United States military to be deployed in combat,” Sessions said. “I don’t believe it’s close to being correct. They provide no legal authority. The only legal authority that’s required to deploy the United States military is of the Congress and the president and the law and the Constitution.” In an effort to re-affirm the fact that “the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution,” Republican Congressman Walter Jones has introduced a resolution in the House of Representatives. The full text reads;
Under the terms of Jones’ resolution, both Panetta and Obama would be subject to impeachment for abusing their power and violating the Constitution in disregarding the authority of Congress and placing a foreign power above its jurisdiction. Despite the Pentagon’s efforts to claim that Panetta’s words were misinterpreted, the Obama administration itself has routinely cited the authority of the United Nations in relation to last year’s invasion of Libya, which was conducted without approval from Congress. In June last year, President Obama arrogantly expressed his hostility to the rule of law when he dismissed the need to get congressional authorization to commit the United States to a military intervention in Libya, churlishly dismissing criticism and remarking, “I don’t even have to get to the Constitutional question.” Obama tried to legitimize his failure to obtain Congressional approval for military involvement by sending a letter to Speaker of the House John Boehner in which he said the military assault was “authorized by the United Nations (U.N.) Security Council.” In boldly asserting the authority of international powers over and above the legislative branch, Panetta and Obama are openly declaring that they no longer represent the American people and instead are water carriers for a global dictatorship that has usurped the sovereignty of the United States. ********************* Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
LINK: Total Despotism in America
The Chicago NATO Summit - GRTV Backgrounder
Ever since its inception there have been
those who have warned that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, far from offering a simple "collective security"
pact to ensure the integrity of its member nations' borders, would in fact be used as an offensive tool of imperial
adventurism and conquest. Since the NATO-led Kosovo bombing campaign of 1999 at the very least, those fears have
appeared more and more justified.
The Globalization of War – GRTV Backgrounder The world's attention is increasingly focused on Syria and Iran as the region continues to move toward military confrontation. Less noticed, however, is that the pieces are being put into place for a truly global conflict, with military buildup taking place in every region and threatening to draw in all of the world's major powers.
Zbigniew Brzezinski Obama's Foreign Policy Advisor
Zbigniew Brzezinski: Obama's Foreign Policy
Adviser
Brzezinski: “Populist Resistance” is Derailing the New World Order Rise in “populist activism” a threat to “external control”
Paul Joseph Watson During a recent speech in Poland, former US National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski warned fellow elitists that a worldwide “resistance” movement to “external control” driven by “populist activism” is threatening to derail the move towards a new world order.
Calling the notion that the 21st century is the American century a “shared delusion,” Brzezinski stated that American domination was no longer possible because of an accelerating social change driven by “instant mass communications such as radio, television and the Internet,” which have been cumulatively stimulating “a universal awakening of mass political consciousness.” The former US National Security Advisor added that this “rise in worldwide populist activism is proving inimical to external domination of the kind that prevailed in the age of colonialism and imperialism.” Brzezinski concluded that “persistent and highly motivated populist resistance of politically awakened and historically resentful peoples to external control has proven to be increasingly difficult to suppress.” Although Brzezinski delivered his comments in a neutral tone, the context of the environment in which he said them allied to his previous statements would indicate that this is not a celebration of “populist resistance” but a lament at the impact it is having on the kind of “external control” Brzezinski has repeatedly advocated. The remarks were made at an event for the European Forum For New Ideas (EFNI), an organization that advocates the transformation of the European Union into an anti-democratic federal superstate, the very type of bureaucratic “external control” Brzezinski stressed was in jeopardy in his lecture. In this context, it must be understood that Brzezinski’s point about “populist resistance” being a major hindrance to the imposition of a new world order is more of a warning than an acclamation. Also consider what Brzezinski wrote in his book Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technotronic Era, in which he advocated the control of populations by an elite political class via technotronic manipulation. “The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities,” wrote Brzezinski. “In the technotronic society the trend would seem to be towards the aggregation of the individual support of millions of uncoordinated citizens, easily within the reach of magnetic and attractive personalities exploiting the latest communications techniques to manipulate emotions and control reason,” he wrote in the same book. Brzezinski’s sudden concern about the impact of a politically awakened global population isn’t born out of any notion that he identifies with their cause. Brzezinski is the ultimate elitist insider, the founder of the powerful Trilateral Commission, a Council on Foreign Relations luminary and a regular Bilderberg attendee. He was once described by President Barack Obama as “one of our most outstanding thinkers”. This is by no means the first time Brzezinski has lamented the burgeoning populist opposition to external domination by a tiny elite. During a 2010 Council on Foreign Relations speech in Montreal, Brzezinski warned fellow globalists that a “global political awakening,” in combination with infighting amongst the elite, was threatening to derail the move towards a one world government.
BILDERBERG=GLOBAL MAFIA
The Real Consequences of Bilderberg If you want to see the real consequences of Bilderberg, look at its plans that have
come to fruition — austerity and loss of national sovereignty and democracy in Europe, the massive transfer of
wealth and manufacturing from American to the communist elite in China. LINK: Bilderberg Group For decades Jim Tucker worked virtually alone
to reveal the hidden organization that scripted the European Union and the Euro even before 1955. He was ignored,
then ridiculed, then fought, but he eventually won. Although Bilderberg is still something of an open secret in the
mainstream media, no one denies its existence and many large media outlets now cover it. Many people have awakened
to this organization's work to destroy the sovereignty or countries and impoverish and enslave their people.
BILDERBERG GROUP
The Bilderberg Group meeting is an annual confab of
around 150 of the world’s most influential powerbrokers in government, industry, banking, media, academia and the
military-industrial complex. The secretive group operates under “Chatham House rules,” meaning that no details of
what is discussed can ever be leaked to the media, despite editors of the world’s biggest newspapers, the
Washington Post, the New York Times
All Too Predictable: Bilderberg Plan to Force NATO’s Turkey Into Syrian War Patrick Henningsen Last Friday saw a Turkish combat jet downed in the Mediterranean Sea by Syrian antiaircraft batteries. Syria insists that Turkey’s F-4 Phantom was shot down inside Syrian airspace. It appears to be a Neo-Ottoman baiting exercise by NATO, and for all intents and purposes, it has worked - so far. Regardless of the facts surrounding this event, the western media machine and political operators will seek to quickly leverage this event in their efforts to move their inevitable Syrian bombardment project forward. To date, NATO’s role for Turkey has been to remain in the shadows, hosting the Syrian National Council, coordinating arms shipments in Syria for foreign fighters, and giving refuge to al-Qaeda rebels across Turkey’s border with Syria. But this latest jet incident is likely to change all that. As was predicted within hours of the initial event last week, Infowars.com – whose analysis was once again days ahead of the mainstream media, accurately predicted that this incident would be used to pull the Turkey further into a central position in NATO’s plan to engage Syria:
In case you missed it last Friday, here is the report hours after the incident – another example of how this website sit much further ahead of the geopolitical analytical curve than the whole the multi billion dollar-capitalized mainstream media:
Patrick Henningsen: Turkish Jets Downed Over Syria and NATO Agenda Infowars.com correspondent Patrick Henningsen breaks down the latest reports of a Turkish
Jet which disappeared over Syrian airspace. Details of this event have yet to be determined, but it may be another
indication that Turkey will be pulled into NATO and the West's agenda for regime change and later balkanization of
Syria.
The corporate mainstream media is of course already positioned to spin this story into a pretext for a war between NATO and the Syria’s Assad government. The world must not forget that this is the very same corporate media who aggressively sold a collection of lies, including a White House concocted fantasy of 500 tons of yellow cake uranium sold to Iraq via Niger, and the same corporate media who attempted to slander Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame as they exposed the Vice Presidential office’s lies of an Iraqi nuclear program – lies which were ultimately successful in getting the United States public to back a full-scale war and permanent military presence in the Middle East. Ignoring the obvious fact that the last thing Syrians want is to undergo a comprehensive NATO bombing campaign that will most certainly level the country, the mindless and reckless corporate media in the US and its affiliates worldwide, along with state-run war propaganda outlets like the BBC in Britain, have predictably jumped on the Turkish jet incident as an exciting opening gambit in a much anticipated military intervention in Syria. Their choice of wording, identical talking points streamlined perfectly across all media outlets is both cynical in nature and frightening in rhetoric – a reality constructed in order to force the public and political classes into an intellectual cul-de-sac where ‘there is no other alternative’ other than military intervention. The Washington Post naturally leads this media onslaught of consensus reality building, as they normalize war talk:
The language of war should be all too familiar by now. In past years, the US Secretary of State’s role was often that of chief diplomat and negotiator in sensitive foreign affairs. Hillary Clinton is a prime example of the new breed of foreign cabinet envoy, whose new role is to promote wars and foreign intervention to both the American public and to other foreign NATO ally affiliates. Condoleezza Rice made this role acceptable, cynically deployed by the Bush Administration on an ever politically correct modern American populace, this new role as ‘Secretary of War’ was more effective than ever when played by a woman (and a Democrat), rather than the traditional warmongering alpha male character, and even more so by an African-American woman – another calculated move by the Bush government which was ultimately effective in pushing their illegal war on the American public. Their efforts will always be backed by a mere handful of predictable political war hacks like Senators John McCain and Joe Lieberman, along with John Bolton. Clinton and her British counterpart William Hague, had shamelessly pushed for the destruction of Libya in 2011, and have continued in similar fashion through steering groups like The Friends of Syria, openly coordinating the procurement and shipment of arms via Qatar and Saudi Arabia to their guerrilla army and al-Qaeda cells within Syria. As we can now see clearly, it’s a long-running project of destabilization with the ultimate goal of regime change and balkanization in that country – designed by western intelligence and globalist banking planners. Clearly in this case, the globalists are in a rush to advance the agenda in Syria, and then move on to neutralize Hezbollah in Lebanon, and finally, the engage Iran – and with this, the first major sparks of a new Third World War. This final move will set the stage for a long-running regional arch of tension which is designed to encompass both Russia and China. This year’s schedule of world events was most probably visible somewhere at the Bilderberg Meeting in Chantilly, VA. The Syrian agenda was most certainly signed-off by the Bilderbergers and delivered to their Syrian National Council representative, Bassma Kodmani, who was in attendance at this year’s Bilderberg Meeting. Globalist Kodmani is said to be the Head of Foreign Affairs with the SNC, working out of Istanbul, Turkey. Also in attendance at this year’s Bilderberg Meeting was British agent and steering committee member, Marcus Agius of Barclays, who happens to also serves as an executive consultant to the BBC. No doubt that the BBC’s war propaganda pledge to Bilderberg was also agreed upon during the meeting. Expect the European and North American domestic terror threat levels in both government and media to also be raised as western involvement increases in Syria – and beyond.
NATO Provokes Syria to War [VID]
http://www.infowars.com/everything-theyre-telling-us-about-syria-is-false/
NATO Backed Freedom Fighters Commit Brutal Atrocities
Who Is Really Behind the Syrian War? SHOW NOTES AND MP3: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=7893
LEARN HOW THE REAL POLITICAL SYSTEM WORKS
HERE: TRAGEDY & HOPE
101
Is "democracy" just a carefully managed con game? Professor Quigley not only spent decades researching and writing about those who secretly control the machinery of our “representative governments,” he was permitted to examine their secret papers. He was invited in, but he ultimately betrayed their trust when he exposed their plans and their methods. - Joe Plummer -
G. Edward Griffin The Quigley Formula Jason Bermas G. Edward Griffin The Quigley Formula Bill Clinton And More From The Archives! Another great speaker who lays out a compelling narrative of history in the archived series! https://www.gofundme.com/f/bermasbrig... Bitcoin - 1HHdgXD5e1DJrDqbEGWbnvzj2eb739eVVo | #BermasBrigade #BritishRoyalty
#ThePredatorClass
REACH OUT TO OTHERS [Help Educate Family And Friends With This Page And The Links Below]
MORE: False Flag Event | MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX | WE WHO DARE SAY NO TO WAR! | War and Collateral Damage | Troops Protect Government Drug Dealing | [ AL-QAEDA EXPOSED!! ] | Obama Now Global Head of Alqaeda! | BENGHAZIGATE | N.W.O. | The United Nations | The International Criminal Court 2 | Road to World Government | Bilderberg Group
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In 1997, Obama’s former foreign affairs adviser, and president Jimmy Carter’s national
security adviser – Zbigniew Brzezinski – wrote a book called The Grand Chessboard arguing
arguing that the U.S. had to take control of Ukraine (as well as Azerbaijan, South
Korea, Turkey and Iran) because they were “critically important geopolitical pivots”.
Below is a speech that Dr. Paul gave on the U.S. House floor on April 1, 2008. It’s
fascinating that the very same speech (with just a few minor tweaks) could be given today:
