John Pilger’s talk on
"The invisible Goverment" is an education in itself about the role of the media from the 1920′s onward. Pilger
explains in clear, concise terms about the role of the "corporate media", how and why it emerged and it’s
dominance as an "invisible government" at the start of the 21st century. After hearing this talk you will not be
reading the NYT, Washington Post or listening to the BBC with the same naive gullibility when you realize the
role of how "professional journalism" has been indirectly responible for millions of deaths since it was
established. We include all 4 parts of John Pilger’s video below, each with his introduction first and his
conclusion at the end
John Pilger’s talk on "The
invisible Goverment" is an education in itself about the role of the media from the 1920′s onward. Pilger explains
in clear, concise terms about the role of the "corporate media", how and why it emerged and it’s dominance as an
"invisible government" at the start of the 21st century. After hearing this talk you will not be reading the NYT,
Washington Post or listening to the BBC with the same naive gullibility when you realize the role of how
"professional journalism" has been indirectly responible for millions of deaths since it was established. We
include all 4 parts of John Pilger’s video below, each with his introduction first and his conclusion at the
end.
The Invisible Government Part I, by John
Pilger
The Invisible Government Part II
The Invisible Government Part III
The Invisible Government Part IV
I wasn’t going to mention The Green Berets when I sat down to write this, until I
read the other day that John Wayne was the most influential movie who ever lived. I a saw the Green Berets starring
John Wayne on a Saturday night in 1968 in Montgomery Alabama. (I was down there to interview the then-infamous
governor George Wallace). I had just come back from Vietnam, and I couldn’t believe how absurd this movie was. So I
laughed out loud, and I laughed and laughed. And it wasn’t long before the atmosphere around me grew very cold. My
companion, who had been a Freedom Rider in the South, said, "Let’s get the hell out of here and run like
hell."
We were chased all the way back to our hotel, but I doubt if any of our pursuers
were aware that John Wayne, their hero, had lied so he wouldn’t have to fight in World War II. And yet the phony
role model of Wayne sent thousands of Americans to their deaths in Vietnam, with the notable exceptions of George
W. Bush and Dick Cheney.
Last year, in his acceptance of the Nobel Prize for Literature, the playwright
Harold Pinter made an epoch speech. He asked why, and I quote him, "The systematic brutality, the widespread
atrocities, the ruthless suppression of independent thought in Stalinist Russia were well know in the West, while
American state crimes were merely superficially recorded, left alone, documented." And yet across the world the
extinction and suffering of countless human beings could be attributed to rampant American power. "But," said
Pinter, "You wouldn’t know it. It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn’t
happening. It didn’t matter. It was of no interest." Pinter’s words were more than the surreal. The BBC ignored the
speech of Britain’s most famous dramatist.
I’ve made a number of documentaries about Cambodia. The first was Year Zero: the
Silent Death of Cambodia. It describes the American bombing that provided the catalyst for the rise of Pol Pot.
What Nixon and Kissinger had started, Pol Pot completed—CIA files alone leave no doubt of that. I offered Year Zero
to PBS and took it to Washington. The PBS executives who saw it were shocked. They whispered among themselves. They
asked me to wait outside. One of them finally emerged and said, "John, we admire your film. But we are disturbed
that it says the United States prepared the way for Pol Pot."
I said, "Do you dispute the evidence?" I had quoted a number of CIA documents.
"Oh, no," he replied. "But we’ve decided to call in a journalistic adjudicator."
Many people who regard themselves on the left supported Bush’s attack on
Afghanistan. That the CIA had supported Osama Bin Laden was ignored, that the Clinton administration had secretly
backed the Taliban, even giving them high-level briefings at the CIA, is virtually unknown in the United States.
The Taliban were secret partners with the oil giant Unocal in building an oil pipeline across Afghanistan. And when
a Clinton official was reminded that the Taliban persecuted women, he said, "We can live with that." There is
compelling evidence that Bush decided to attack the Taliban not as a result of 9-11, but two months earlier, in
July of 2001. This is virtually unknown in the United States—publicly. Like the scale of civilian casualties in
Afghanistan. To my knowledge only one mainstream reporter, Jonathan Steele of the Guardian in London, has
investigated civilian casualties in Afghanistan, and his estimate is 20,000 dead civilians, and that was three
years ago.
The enduring tragedy of Palestine is due in great part to the silence and
compliance of the so-called liberal left. Hamas is described repeatedly as sworn to the destruction of Israel. The
New York Times, the Associated Press, the Boston Globe—take your pick. They all use this line as a standard
disclaimer, and it is false. That Hamas has called for a ten-year ceasefire is almost never reported. Even more
important, that Hamas has undergone an historic ideological shift in the last few years, which amounts to a
recognition of what it calls the reality of Israel, is virtually unknown; and that Israel is sworn to the
destruction of Palestine is unspeakable.
There is a pioneering study by Glasgow University on the reporting of Palestine.
They interviewed young people who watch TV news in Britain. More than 90 percent thought the illegal settlers were
Palestinian. The more they watched, the less they knew—Danny Schecter’s famous phrase.
The current most dangerous silence is over nuclear weapons and the return of the
Cold War. The Russians understand clearly that the so-called American defense shield in Eastern Europe is designed
to subjugate and humiliate them. Yet the front pages here talk about Putin starting a new Cold War, and there is
silence about the development of an entirely new American nuclear system called Reliable Weapons Replacement (RRW),
which is designed to blur the distinction between conventional war and nuclear war—a long-held ambition.
John Pilger is a
world-renowned journalist, author and documentary filmmaker, who began his career in 1958 in his homeland,
Australia, before moving to London in the 1960s.
He regards eye-witness as the essence of good journalism. He has been a foreign
correspondent and a front-line war reporter, beginning with the Vietnam war in 1967. He is an impassioned critic of
foreign military and economic adventures by Western governments.
"It is too easy," he says, "for Western journalists to see humanity in terms of
its usefulness to 'our' interests and to follow government agendas that ordain good and bad tyrants, worthy and
unworthy victims and present 'our' policies as always benign when the opposite is usually true. It's the
journalist's job, first of all, to look in the mirror of his own society."
He believes a journalist also ought to be a guardian of the public memory and
often quotes Milan Kundera: "The struggle of people against power is the struggle of memory against
forgetting."
Noam Chomsky wrote: "John Pilger's work has been a beacon of light in often dark
times. The realities he has brought to light have been a revelation, over and over again, and his courage and
insight a constant inspiration."
Harold Pinter wrote: "John Pilger unearths, with steely attention, the facts, the
filthy truth, and tells it as it is."
In 2009, John Pilger wasawarded
the Sydney Peace Prize, Australia's international human rights
award.
Honours D. Litt, Staffordshire
University D. Phil, Dublin City University D. Arts, Oxford Brookes University D. Laws, St.Andrew's University D. Phil, Kingston University D. Univ, The Open University 1995 Edward Wilson Fellow, Deakin University, Melbourne Frank H.T. Rhodes Professor, Cornell University, USA
Selected Awards 1966:
Descriptive Writer of the Year 1967: Reporter of the Year 1967: Journalist of the Year 1970: International Reporter of the Year 1974: News Reporter of the Year 1977: Campaigning Journalist of the Year 1979: Journalist of the Year 1979-80: UN Media Peace Prize, Australia 1980-81: UN Media Peace Prize, Gold Medal, Australia 1979: TV Times Readers' Award 1990: The George Foster Peabody Award, USA 1991: American Television Academy Award ('Emmy') 1991: British Academy of Film and Television Arts - The Richard Dimbleby
Award 1990: Reporters San Frontiers Award, France 1995: International de Television Geneve Award 2001: The Monismanien Prize (Sweden) 2003: The Sophie Prize for Human Rights (Norway) 2003: EMMA Media Personality of the Year 2004: Royal Television Society Best Documentary, 'Stealing a Nation' 2008: Best Documentary, One World Awards, 'The War On Democracy' 2009: Sydney Peace Prize
Daniel
Davis, Matthew Hoh, and Danny Sjursen reflect on America’s war in Afghanistan in light of the Washington Post’s
publishing of a trove of formerly confidential documents on the war. The report, which is being hailed as this
generations Pentagon Papers, details the ways officials in the Bush, Obama, and
Trump administrations have lied about the progress being made in Afghanistan and the need to keep troops
there. Even though lots of people like Davis, Hoh, and Sjursen have been speaking out for years
about America’s forever wars, they say that it’s embarrassing for top brass to admit that lower level officers
could see strategic failures that the war planners could not—and so voices like theirs mostly just don’t get heard.
At some point all three guests had moments that convinced them they couldn’t keep contributing to this lost cause
in good conscience, and have since striven to show the world what’s really going on. We
need to bring back a healthy skepticism, they say, of the idea that America’s military is a wise force for good in
the world. (bold emphasis added)
One former UK Ambassador, three international investigative journalists and two
leading professors discuss misreporting, misinformation and deliberate propaganda disseminated by
the mainstream media at times of international conflict, and military intervention.
One former UK Ambassador, three international investigative journalists and two
leading professors discuss misreporting, misinformation and deliberate propaganda disseminated by
the mainstream media at times of international conflict, and military intervention. The
demonisation of one non-aligned leader after another, setting the stage for public consent for
regime change has been part and parcel of establishment and corporate media's agenda this century.
While sidelining independent research and refusing to independently verify its own reporting the
mainstream has become obsessed with 'fake news' - So who is spreading 'fake news'? What effect has
fake news and propaganda had? Should we make the media accountable for its actions? These questions
and more are discussed by our expert panel in an event organised by Frome Stop War and supported by
Bristol Against Imperialism, entitled 'Media on Trial'.
One former UK Ambassador, three international investigative journalists and two
leading professors discuss misreporting, misinformation and deliberate propaganda disseminated by
the mainstream media at times of international conflict, and military intervention.
ROBERT STUART PRESENTATION ON BBC PANORAMA 'SAVING SYRIA'S CHILDREN'
Robert Stuart is a former newspaper reporter who has been researching the many startling inconsistencies and
anomalies surrounding the BBC Panorama documentary ‘Saving Syria’s Children’ since material from the programme was
first broadcast as MPs voted on military intervention in Syria on the evening of 29 August 2013. Robert’s research
has been endorsed by former UK Ambassador Craig Murray and has been featured on RT (Russia Today) and Radio
Sputnik.
• “...brilliant dissection of the BBC’s propaganda blitz on Syria, at the time when the security
establishment were trying to propel us into war against Assad... ... this is very, very important” – Craig Murray,
former UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan
• “This [Saving Syria’s Children] was so badly done it is no wonder that all copies of the
documentary are being purged from YouTube, etc.” – Dr Christopher Davidson, Reader in Middle East Politics, Durham
University, author ‘After the Sheikhs: The Coming Collapse of the Gulf Monarchies’
• [The BBC’s material] “clearly was faked”; “...any damage to the reputation and good name of the
BBC [was] self-inflicted” and the BBC programmes “should never have been broadcast” – TV-Novosti, Ofcom Broadcast
Bulletin, 21 September 2015.
Pirated satellite feeds revealing U.S. media personalities' contemptuous plans for their viewers come full
circle in Spin. TV out-takes appropriated from network satellite feeds unravel the tightly spun fabric of
television, a system which silences public debates and furthers the intolerance of anyone outside the pack of
journalists, politicians, spin doctors and televangelists who manufacture the news. Spin moves through the L.A.
rebellion and the floating TV talk-show called the 1992 U.S. presidential election.
Documentary on how the media lies to manipulate us
Did you know that Kentucky is in Syria? Or that Tripoli is in India? Or that Caracas is in
Singapore? No? Then you must not be paying enough attention in MSM Geography 101, class. Better hit the books!
HighImpactFlix | First published at 18:24 UTC on May 28th, 2020
REMINDER: I'm sending out the free book (Gustave Le Bon: The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind)
tonight at 11:59 CST to everybody who is a confirmed subscriber to my newsletter. Click here: http://bit.ly/HighImpactFlixOfficial (don't forget to
CONFIRM)
The
Future of Fake News in the Digital Matrix
Truthstream Media |First published at 04:10
UTC on October 20th, 2019. |Our second Bitchute-only vid. Please, if you
can, help support us on Patreon.
We're working on our second feature-length film now. Anything and everything helps.https://www.patreon.com/truthstreammedia
Though its ostensible purpose is to fund the U.S.
military over a one year period, the National Defense Authorization Act, better known as the NDAA,
has had
numerous provisions tucked into it over the years that have targeted American civil liberties. The most
well-known of these include allowing the government to wiretap American citizens without a warrant and, even more
disturbingly, indefinitely imprison an American citizen without charge in the name of “national security.”
One of the lesser-known provisions that have snuck their way into the NDAA over the years was a small piece of
legislation tacked onto the NDAA for fiscal year 2013,
signed into law in that same year by then-President Barack Obama. Named “The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act
of 2012,” it
completely lifted the long-existing ban on the domestic dissemination of U.S. government-produced
propaganda.
For decades, the U.S. government had been allowed to produce and disseminate
propaganda abroad in order to drum up support for its foreign wars but had been banned from distributing it
domestically after the passage of the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948. However, the Modernization Act’s co-authors, Reps.
Mac Thornberry (R-TX) and Adam Smith (D-WA, no relation to the Smith of the 1948 act),asserted thatremoving the domestic
ban was necessary in order to combat “al-Qaeda’s and other violent extremists’ influence among populations.”
South Front
Published on Dec 26, 2018
If you’re able, and if you like our content and approach, please support the project. Our work wouldn’t be possible
without your help: PayPal: southfront@list.ru, http://southfront.org/donate/ or via: https://www.patreon.com/southfront,
BTC: 3Gbs4rjcVUtQd8p3CiFUCxPLZwRqurezRZ, BCH: qpf2cphc5dkuclkqur7lhj2yuqq9pk3hmukle77vhq,
ETH: 0x9f4cda013e354b8fc285bf4b9a60460cee7f7ea9
March 19, 2013. Ten years ago today the Bush regime invaded Iraq. It is known that the
justification for the invasion was a packet of lies orchestrated by the neoconservative Bush regime in order to
deceive the United Nations and the American people.
The US Secretary of State at that time, General Colin Powell, has expressed his regrets that he was used by the
Bush regime to deceive the United Nations with fake intelligence that the Bush and Blair regimes knew to be fake.
But the despicable presstitute media has not apologized to the American people for serving the corrupt Bush regime
as its Ministry of Propaganda and Lies.
It is difficult to discern which is the most despicable, the corrupt Bush regime, the presstitutes that enabled it,
or the corrupt Obama regime that refuses to prosecute the Bush regime for its unambiguous war crimes, crimes
against the US Constitution, crimes against US statutory law, and crimes against humanity. http://www.infowars.com/iraq-after-te...
Iraq: 10 Years Later with Darrin McBreen & Aaron
Dykes
[VID]
March 19, 2013. Ten years ago today the Bush regime invaded Iraq. It is known that the
justification for the invasion was a packet of lies orchestrated by the neoconservative Bush regime in order to
deceive the United Nations and the American people.
The US Secretary of State at that time, General Colin Powell, has expressed his regrets that he was used by the
Bush regime to deceive the United Nations with fake intelligence that the Bush and Blair regimes knew to be fake.
But the despicable presstitute media has not apologized to the American people for serving the corrupt Bush regime
as its Ministry of Propaganda and Lies.
It is difficult to discern which is the most despicable, the corrupt Bush regime, the presstitutes that enabled it,
or the corrupt Obama regime that refuses to prosecute the Bush regime for its unambiguous war crimes, crimes
against the US Constitution, crimes against US statutory law, and crimes against humanity. http://www.infowars.com/iraq-after-te...
THE PENTAGON
STEALS 21 TRILLION
DOLLARS COMPLETE MEDIA
BLACKOUT!
"...True, the United States does enjoy the “benefit” of appearing supremely powerful,
but this is only a cruel joke. When the Network is satisfied that all major obstacles to its unelected rule have
been removed, it will be a simple matter to destroy the US dollar, “justifiably” cut off the flow of money and
credit to the United States, and create the political incentive (necessity) for the United States to fully enter
the new global system..."
Dr. Mark Skidmore of Michigan State University joins us to
discuss his research with Catherine Austin Fitts into the $21 trillion in unaccounted transactions on the
books of the US Department of Defence and the US Department of Housing and Urban Development. We discuss what
we know and don't know about the subject, the Pentagon's nonsensical and inadequate excuses for the debacle,
the new accounting guideline that legally allows every department of the federal government to create fake
and altered books for public consumption, the recent failed Pentagon audit, the government's refusal to
provide any information about the problem, the failure of congress to pursue the issue, and the failure of
the press to report on it.
This is part of our series on the unaccounted for $21 Trillion
in taxpayer money. As unbelievable and absurd as that sounds, the actual total of unaccounted for money at
the Pentagon is most likely significantly more than $21 trillion. The First ever “full-scope audit” of the
Pentagon is presently underway. Read the first report from this series
here.
*
According to the Department of Defense Inspector General and the Defense Finance and Accounting Service,
$21 Trillion in Taxpayer Funding Is Unaccounted For.
To help people comprehend the scale of this, $1 Trillion is $1000 Billion. This means that $21,000 Billion
in taxpayer money has gone missing.
How can this be possible?
We outlined the “Unaccountable System of Global War Profiteers” in detail here.
For further understanding, we are featuring another mind-blowing Department of
Defense Inspector General (DOD IG) report.
The following are highlights from the DOD IG “Summary of DOD Office of the
Inspector General Audits of Financial Management”:
The financial management systems DOD has put in place to control and
monitor the money flow don’t facilitate but actually “prevent DOD from
collecting and reporting financial information… that is accurate, reliable,
and timely.” (p. 4)
DOD frequently enters “unsupported” (i.e. imaginary) amounts in its
books (p. 13) and uses those figures to make the books balance. (p.
14)
Inventory records are not reviewed and adjusted; unreliable and
inaccurate data are used to report inventories, and purchases are made
based on those distorted inventory reports. (p. 7)
DOD managers do not know how much money is in their accounts at the
Treasury, or when they spend more than Congress appropriates to them. (p.
5)18
Nor does DOD “record, report, collect, and reconcile” funds received
from other agencies or the public (p. 6),
DOD tracks neither buyer nor seller amounts when conducting
transactions with other agencies. (p. 12)
“The cost and depreciation of the DOD general property, plant, and
equipment are not reliably reported….” (p. 8);
“… the value of DOD property and material in the possession of
contractors is not reliably reported.” (p. 9)
DOD does not know who owes it money, nor how much. (p. 10.)
“audit trails” are not kept “in sufficient detail,” which means
no one can track the
money;
DOD’s “Internal Controls,” intended to track the money, are inoperative.
Thus, DOD cost reports and financial statements are inaccurate, and the size,
even the direction (in plus or minus values), of the errors cannot be
identified, and
DOD does not observe many of the laws that govern all this.
It is as if the accountability and appropriations clauses of the U.S.
Constitution were just window dressing, behind which this mind-numbing malfeasance
thrives.
[SHORT v.]
Update on that
missing $21+ Trillion, David DeGraw & Lee
Camp
Changemaker Media
Published on Jun 22, 2018
The fundamental rule when operating in chaos is
to tell the “truth.” It is all you have as a shield & weapon.
That is the guidepost...
Technically, this is a violation of the Anti-Deficiency Act, a statute
carrying felony sanctions of fines and imprisonment.
Congress and the Pentagon annually report and hold hearings on DOD’s lack of
financial accountability and sometimes enact new laws, but many of the new laws
simply permit the Pentagon to ignore the previous ones; others are eyewash.
If you have a system that does not accurately know what its spending history is,
and does not know what it is now (and does not care to redress the matter), how can
you expect it to make a competent, honest estimate of future costs?
It is self-evident that an operation that tolerates inaccurate, unverifiable
data cannot be soundly managed; it exempts itself from any reasonable standard of
efficiency.
Recall, also that the errors in cost, schedule and performance that result are
not random: actual costs always turn out to be much higher than, sometimes even
multiples of, early estimates; the schedule is always optimistic, and the
performance is always inflated.
The Pentagon, defense industry and their congressional operatives want – need –
to increase the money flow into the system to pretend to improve it.
Supported by a psychology of excessive secrecy, generated fear and the
ideological belief that there is no alternative to high cost, high complexity
weapons, higher budgets are easier to justify, especially if no one can sort out
how the Pentagon actually spends its money.
The key to the DOD spending problem is to initiate financial accountability. No
failed system can be understood or fixed if it cannot be accurately measured.
And yet, there is no sense of urgency in the Pentagon to do anything about
it.
Indeed, in the 1990s, we were promised the accountability problem would be
solved by 1997. In the early 2000s, we were promised it would be solved by 2007;
then by 2016; then by 2017….
[LONG v.]
Truth About $21
Trillion Missing At The Pentagon w/ David
Degraw
Changemaker Media
Published on Jun 22, 2018
How $21 Trillion in U.S. Tax Money Disappeared.
“Full Scope Audit” of the Pentagon
The question must be asked: if nothing has been done by the Pentagon to end
the accountability problem after more than 20 years of promises, is top management
simply incompetent, or is this the intended result of obfuscation to avert
accountability?
A spending system that effectively audits its weapon programs and offices would
also be one that systemically uncovers incompetent and crooked managers, false
promises and those who made them.
It would also necessarily reveal reasons to dramatically alter, if not cease,
funding for some programs, which of course would make lots of people in industry,
Congress, and the executive branch unhappy.
The current system and its out of control finances mortally harm our defenses,
defraud taxpayers, and bloat the Pentagon and federal budgets.
Any reform that fails to address this most fundamental problem is merely another
doomed attempt that will only serve to perpetuate a system that thrives on
falsehoods and deception.
William Hartung, Director of the Arms and
Security Project at the Center for International Policy, summed up the accountability crisis at the Pentagon
by saying:
“Call it irony or call it symptomatic of the department’s way of life, but an analysis by the Project on
Government Oversight notes the Pentagon has so far spent roughly $6 billion on ‘fixing’ the audit problem —
with no solution in sight.
If anything, the Defense Department’s accounting practices have been getting worse.”
The above post was an excerpt from The Pentagon Labyrinth,
10 Short Essays to Help You Through It. It was written by, “10 Pentagon Insiders, Retired Military
Officers and Specialists With Over 400 Years of Defense Experience.” The section we featured is from Essay
#8, Decoding the Defense Budget: The Ultimate in Cooked Numbers, by Winslow T.
Wheeler. * Report Full PDF Here *
"...True, the United States does enjoy the “benefit” of appearing supremely powerful,
but this is only a cruel joke. When the Network is satisfied that all major obstacles to its unelected rule have
been removed, it will be a simple matter to destroy the US dollar, “justifiably” cut off the flow of money and
credit to the United States, and create the political incentive (necessity) for the United States to fully enter
the new global system..."
"Let's look at the track records, what kind of news source in the U.S. let's say in the past
fifteen years, twenty years, has the highest level of disseminating fake news? I'm talking about factual grounds,
I'm not talking about sensationalism or embellishment okay. What were the sources for the WMD (Weapons of Mass
Destruction) stories that were sold to the public, marketed on hourly basis, not even hourly on minutely basis to
the public?...Mainstream Media: NBC, NPR, CNN, all these sources. And now that we all know it has been established
that for example that WMD stories were all fake, they were lies, they were false...can you recall any of these
publications Mainstream Media publications: NBC, CNN, NPR, PBS, ever coming and issuing an official formal
retraction? Have you heard any of these channels coming and actually apologizing, and saying we disseminated fake
news. And we basically got us into the war by manufacturing consent from the public and that caused tens of
billions of dollars if not trillions of dollars in terms of dollar costs, and all these lives, you know...People in
Iraq and also American Soldiers died. So you're looking at criminal lie in this case, but what kind of consequences
those Mainstream Media channels have faced?"
"The globalists create confusion by design so
that people see a smoke screen and can't figure out what's going on and that they hope would just
roll over and give up."
-- Alex Jones, vid: Trump Puppeted By Pro-War Left To
Attack Syria --
Adaptation and
Conformity The Selling Out of Alex Jones/Infowars
Link:Psywars
WAR IS A RACKET!—
Major General Smedley D. Butler
In 2009, less than two months after Barack Obama was inaugurated as president,
Alex Jones/Infowars released a documentary (The Obama Deception) exposing him as a mask
used by the corrupt power elite to instigate and provide cover to their machinations. Central to
this presentation was the “real” executive power structure. “…The president serves the military
industrial complex, itself owned by the international bankers.” However, in 2017, though Donald
Trump was a puppet like his predecessor, Alex Jones promoted him as a maverick outside of this
systemic corruption that has plagued America since Dwight D. Eisenhower coined the phrase,
“Military Industrial Complex.” Using the war in Yemen—which has produced the greatest humanitarian
crisis on earth—as a case example, The Trump Jones Deception shows how both men were
yet another mask of deceit worn by the corrupt establishment.
Under the rubric of Zionism, the dispossession
of Palestinians and annexation of their land has for decades been hidden in plain sight, along with Israeli
apartheid and ethnic cleansing. Though tourism flows in steadily to "The Holy Land," masking these egregious past
and present events from scrutiny, has been and is nothing short of Orwellian. The Zionist state of Israel is a
totalitarian state, whose ideologues' sentiments match those advocating world government. As Rev. Chuck Baldwin
exclaims, "For all intents and purposes, the Globalist agenda (the New World Order, call it what you will) and the
Zionist agenda, are one and the same." The Trump Jones Deception 2, demonstrates this fact, and the way in which
both Donald Trump and Alex Jones are a part of it.
Smith-Mundt Act “reformed” this month allowing CIA to
disseminate propaganda
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
July 15, 2013
Operation Mockingbird, the CIA’s
long term effort to control the news, has shifted into overdrive.
On July 2, a little noticed “reform” passed in January went into effect. The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, passed as part of the 2013 National Defense
Authorization Act, will allow the CIA to flood America with more government propaganda.
The Smith-Mundt Act, passed as the national security state was taking shape in 1948, authorized the State Department to
unleash a tidal wave of propaganda outside the United States while supposedly forbidding its dissemination
inside the country. The law set the stage for Frank Wisner, who headed up the CIA’s covert action division in
the early 1950s, to build his “mighty Wurlitzer,” described by none other than the New York Times as “the means for orchestrating, in almost any language anywhere in the
world, whatever tune the CIA was in the mood to hear.”
In the years since, the establishment media has worked hand in glove with the CIA.
This cozy relationship was revealed by Frank Church and the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with
Respect to Intelligence Activities in 1975 and, a few years later, by reporter Carl Bernstein.
“Among the chief executives who helped the CIA were William Paley of CBS, Henry Luce of Time, Arthur Sulzberger
of the New York Times, Barry Bingham Sr. of the Louisville Courier-Journal, and James Copley of the Copley News
Service,” write Amy Goodman and David Goodman in Unreality TV,The Mighty Wurlitzer, Hijacking Public Media, a chapter from the book Static:
GovernmentLiars, Media Cheerleaders, and the People Who Fight Back. “The leading TV
networks, including ABC and NBC, and the wire services-AP, UPI, Reuters, along with Hearst Newspapers, Scripps
Howard, Newsweek, the Miami Herald, and the Saturday Evening Post all had dealings with the spy agency. The
CIA’s most valuable associations were with the New York Times, CBS, and Time Inc.”
This media penetration by the CIA is not merely a baseless conspiracy theory as some
might argue, but is backed up by CIA office memos released under FOIA revealing the placement of “important assets”
inside every major news organization in the country. “It was not until 1982 that the Agency openly admitted that
reporters on the CIA payroll have acted as case officers to agents in the field,” writes Alex Constantine.
“Most consumers of the corporate media were – and are – unaware of the effect that the salting of public opinion
has on their own beliefs,” Constantine continues. “A network anchorman in time of national crisis is an instrument
of psychological warfare in the MOCKINGBIRD media. He is a creature from the national security sector’s chamber of
horrors. For this reason consumers of the corporate press have reason to examine their basic beliefs about
government and life in the parallel universe of these United States.”
Despite the promise of the Smith-Mundt Act – that a firewall stands between foreign and domestic propaganda –
the CIA, the bastard child of Wall Street lawyers, has never honored its charter (prohibiting domestic
operation) and has consistently utilized the corporate media as a propaganda machine.
Enactment of the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act underscores the fact the CIA no longer
pretends to honor its charter and refrains from flooding the media with government propaganda. “The evaporation of
Smith-Mundt and other provisions to safeguard U.S. citizens against government propaganda campaigns is part of a
larger trend within the diplomatic and military establishment,” ace reporter Michael Hastings wrote in May, 2012, more than a year before his assassination.
In fact, this “larger trend” has been in effect since the imposition of the National
Security Act in 1947 and the establishment of the National Security Council, the principal forum used by the
financial elite and their intelligence apparatus to dictate policy to the president of the United States and the
State Department.
“Conspiracy Theory”: Foundations of a
Weaponized Term Subtle and Deceptive Tactics to Discredit Truth in
Media and Research
By James F. Tracy
Global Research, January 22, 2013
“Conspiracy theory” is a term that at once strikes fear and
anxiety in the hearts of most every public figure, particularly journalists and academics. Since the 1960s the
label has become a disciplinary device that has been overwhelmingly effective in defining certain events off limits
to inquiry or debate. Especially in the United States raising legitimate questions about dubious official
narratives destined to inform public opinion (and thereby public policy) is a major thought crime that must be
cauterized from the public psyche at all costs.
Conspiracy theory’s acutely negative connotations may be traced to liberal historian Richard Hofstadter’s
well-known fusillades against the “New Right.” Yet it was the Central Intelligence Agency that likely played the
greatest role in effectively “weaponizing” the term. In the groundswell of public skepticism toward the Warren
Commission’s findings on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the CIA sent a detailed directive to all
of its bureaus. Titled “Countering
Criticism of the Warren Commission Report,” the dispatch played a definitive role in making
the “conspiracy theory” term a weapon to be wielded against almost any individual or group calling the
government’s increasingly clandestine programs and activities into question.
This important memorandum and its broad implications for American politics and public discourse are detailed in
a forthcoming book by Florida State University political scientist Lance de-Haven-Smith, Conspiracy
Theory in America. Dr. de-Haven-Smith devised the
state crimes against democracy concept to interpret and explain potential government complicity in events
such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the major political assassinations of the 1960s, and 9/11.
“CIA Document 1035-960” was released in response to a 1976 FOIA request by the New York
Times. The directive is especially significant because it outlines the CIA’s concern regarding “the whole
reputation of the American government” vis-à-vis the Warren Commission Report. The agency was especially interested
in maintaining its own image and role as it “contributed information to the [Warren] investigation.”
The memorandum lays out a detailed series of actions and techniques for “countering and discrediting the claims
of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries.” For example,
approaching “friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors)” to remind them of the Warren
Commission’s integrity and soundness should be prioritized. “[T]he charges of the critics are without serious
foundation,” the document reads, and “further speculative discussion only plays in to the hands of the [Communist]
opposition.”
The agency also directed its members “[t]o employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of the
critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose.”
1035-960 further delineates specific techniques for countering “conspiratorial” arguments centering on the
Warren Commission’s findings. Such responses and their coupling with the pejorative label have been routinely
wheeled out in various guises by corporate media outlets, commentators and political leaders to this day against
those demanding truth and accountability about momentous public events.
No significant new evidence has emerged which the [Warren] Commission did not consider.
Critics usually overvalue particular items and ignore others.
Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to conceal in the United States.
Critics have often been enticed by a form of intellectual pride: they light on some theory and fall in love
with it.
Oswald would not have been any sensible person’s choice for a co-conspirator.
Such vague accusations as that “more than ten people have died mysteriously” [during the Warren
Commission’s inquiry] can always be explained in some natural way e.g.: the individuals concerned have for the
most part died of natural causes.
Today more so than ever news media personalities and commentators occupy powerful positions for initiating
propaganda activities closely resembling those set out in 1035-960 against anyone who might question
state-sanctioned narratives of controversial and poorly understood occurrences. Indeed, as the motives and methods
encompassed in the document have become fully internalized by intellectual workers and operationalized through such
media, the almost uniform public acceptance of official accounts concerning unresolved events such as the Oklahoma
City Murrah Federal Building bombing, 9/11, and most recently the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, is largely
guaranteed.
The effect on academic and journalistic inquiry into ambiguous and unexplained events that may in turn mobilize
public inquiry, debate and action has been dramatic and far-reaching. One need only look to the rising police state
and evisceration of civil liberties and constitutional protections as evidence of how this set of subtle and
deceptive intimidation tactics has profoundly encumbered the potential for future independent self-determination
and civic empowerment.
Once again, the Conan O’Brien show has revealed countless
examples of local media reading off the same script, proving that most corporate news outlets do nothing more than
push national talking points.
This article was posted: Sunday, February 2, 2014 at 8:09 am
These two events above were not covered in this video due to time restrictions - each would require
its own video to do it justice. The scope of this video is a "primer" on the controlled mass media.
New Tech Shows Why You Can't Trust
Anything You See on the News
Published on Mar 20, 2016
I'm not even sure what to write for a description. What else can you say? It's the
Matrix.
As the US and Iranian governments escalate tensions in the already volatile Straits of Hormuz,
and China and Russia begin openly questioning Washington's interference in their internal politics, the world
remains on a knife-edge of military tension. Far from being a dispassionate observer of these developments,
however, the media has in fact been central to increasing those tensions and preparing the public to expect a
military confrontation. But as the online media rises to displace the traditional forms by which the public forms
its understanding of the world, many are now beginning to see first hand how the media lies the public into
war.
Learn more about the media manipulations behind the beginning of war in this week's GRTV backgrounder.
When the first edition of The Media Monopoly was published in 1983, critics called Ben
Bagdikian's warnings about the chilling effects of corporate ownership and mass advertising on the nation's news
"alarmist." Since then, the number of corporations controlling most of America's daily newspapers, magazines, radio
and television stations, book publishers, and movie companies has dwindled from fifty to ten
to five.
Now
Only FIVE Massive Corporations Control Over 90% Of What Americans See, Read Or Hear
The Last American Vagabond
Published on Mar 26, 2019
This is an excerpt of The Daily Wrap Up 3/23.
Dead Palestinians Don't Matter to
Mainstream Media
[VID]
Published on Jul 12, 2014
Citizens of Planet Earth, shadow forces are
using conquer-and-divide tactics to pit us against each other for their own nefarious ends. Some even use
religious justification to allow this battle to rage on in hopes of jumpstarting the apocalypse. We MUST stand
up to tyranny in all forms lest we have the blood of dead children on our hands.
A Clinton campaign email released as part of the Wikileaks data dump earlier today
talks about the need to maintain political power by producing “an unaware and compliant
citizenry”.
Infowars Shatters Multiple Mainstream Media Lies in
Ferguson, MO
[VID]
Published on Aug 17, 2014
As the worlds eyes are on Ferguson, MO the mainstream media has been caught multiple
times in spreading manipulative lies. Whether it's the lie that the riot police helped Al Jazeera while shooting
rubber bullets and tear gas at them or the lie that on Saturday night tear gas wasn't shot at protestors,
Infowars has been exposing the lies from the front lines.
CNN Lies About Tear Gas in
Ferguson Infowars reporters hit with chemical agent as media covers for
police
by Infowars.com | August 17, 2014
CNN denied reports that tear gas was used in Ferguson, Mo. Sunday morning
after protesters defied the state-imposed curfew.
[VID]
Despite initially reporting on the use of tear gas, CNN quickly retracted their statements to
instead give a police-friendly version of events, telling viewers that only smoke was used.
Those on scene took to social media to refute CNN’s claims with evidence of tear gas canisters. Even as other news
outlets began to confirm the use of tear gas, CNN continued to blindly rely only on reports from police.
Infowars reporters were hit with tear gas shortly after leaving the designated press area to
document the remaining protesters.
[VID]
Demonstrators defied the martial law crackdown by continuing to protest well past the midnight
curfew.
[VID]
It's government re-education time again,
and in an effort to support the ongoing Infowar aimed at injecting liberty and truth into the mainstream education
system, the Infowars Store is having a limited time 10% discount on all items by using promo
code "10". Click here for more information.
CNN caught red handed covering up CDC medical genocide of
African-American babies
Monday, August 25, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
(NaturalNews) While CNN salivates over the
news potential of an African-American teen being shot by a police officer, the network deliberately censors any
news of the systematic medical abuse of African-American children by the CDC and the vaccine industry. That's
the startling revelation which has now surfaced from recent events.
Following the explosive story of a key CDC scientist and whistleblower going public with his admission that the CDC
committed scientific fraud to bury the truth about MMR vaccines causing autism, CNN has twice censored citizen
journalists who posted well-cited stories on CNN's iReport website.
CNN has been aggressively monitoring its own website to commit content suppression actions as rapidly
as possible, making sure any truthful reporting about the CDC, MMR vaccines and autism gets deleted as quickly as
possible.
The first story posted on CNN's iReport site stayed up for 19 hours before CNN censors noticed it and
ordered it deleted. By that time, it had racked up 17,000 shares and was starting to go viral. The author of that
story contacted The Truth
Barrier and explained how CNN content censors lied:
I wrote the CNN iReport. The producer contacted me and wanted to know how I know what I know. I gave her contact
info for Hooker, and also for Thompson's attorney. I took her through the entire Hooker/Thompson timeline of
events. I told her what else is coming soon. The producer said she was calling Hooker right away and that if they
verified the story they’d put it back up. Hooker said they never called. The story is still down.
The second story was removed far more quickly, lasting just two hours before it too was censored. The story "had
garnered 20,000 views and 5,000 shares, before it was deleted," reports TruthBarrier.com.
CNN restores the second story with obvious intention of removing it again
After a wave of public outrage at CNN's obvious censorship of this historical story involving the
medical abuse of black babies, CNN reluctantly restored
the second story, which now has over 15,000 social media shares. But CNN added a note to the story, stating,
"CNN has reached out to the CDC for comment and is working to confirm the claims in this iReport."
What this means is that CNN will simply wait for a reply from the CDC which will obviously say, "These claims are
false" for the simple reason that the CDC is the group which committed the criminal fraud in the first
place! For CNN to ask the CDC whether it lied is like asking 100 prison inmates whether any of them are
guilty.
Once the CDC responds to CNN with yet more lies, CNN will of course use that fabricated response to pull the story
down yet again.
This is what happens when the mainstream media functions as nothing more than a band of Big Pharma media puppets.
They ask no real questions; they investigate nothing that matters; and they trust the "official" word of the CDC
even when it's the CDC that has committed this outrageous act of scientific fraud that harms black children in the
first place.
Consider the outrageousness of CNN's censorship of this systematical medical abuse of
African-American children
The fact that the CDC actively and knowingly committed scientific fraud to cover up this fact calls into question
the entire credibility of both the CDC and the vaccine industry -- both of which have been steeped in lies and
criminality for decades.
The fact that CNN declared a site-wide media blackout on the CDC cover-up story is a true turning point in the
history of media; a point where the corporate-run "mainstream media" publicly admits it has no interest in
reporting anything other than corporate-sponsored lies and propaganda. This is the day when America learned that
CNN will deliberately censor the biggest story in the history of "racist medicine" and "vaccine violence" by
conspiring with the CDC and Big Pharma to pretend this story never happened.
CNN's reputation is worse than merely in shambles over this cover-up... it has self destructed. There is no reason
to ever trust CNN again on ANY story. Because it's not just the stories CNN reports that you can't trust...
it's the stories the network refuses to report that are even more important.
As CNN has demonstrated itself, it exists today as nothing more than a propaganda mouthpiece with a racist,
eugenics agenda to harm as many black babies as possible while censoring all citizen journalists who attempt to
report the truth about this crime against humanity.
By covering up this story, CNN is complicit in the genocidal agenda of the CDC which actively conspired
to prevent the African-American community from learning the truth about MMR vaccines and autism. Today, CNN's
message to the world is essentially, "When black babies are being maimed and killed by bad medicine, we will
actively suppress all reporting on the story, making sure even more black babies are destroyed in the name of
vaccine profits."
CNN founder Ted Turner, a very vocal fan of human depopulation, would be proud. What better way to accomplish the
culling of human babies than to call it "immunization" and get everybody to line up and pay for it?
Sign the petition to retract the fraudulent MMR vaccine study from 2004
This petition is a demand for Pediatrics, the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, to
publicly issue a retraction of Drs. DeStefano, Bhasin, Thompson, Yeargin-Allsopp, and Boyle's 2004 study entitled,
"Age at first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in children with autism and school-matched control subjects: a
population-based study in metropolitan Atlanta."
A general loathing and distaste for how the media openly perceives the public has
signaled its demise. What matters most to the American people, means very little to the politicized culture in
the white house. Its an election year after all. The Disengaged Obama Administration’s Assumption that public
perception is under controlled manipulation, only adds fuel to downward spiral of trust contained in the gallup
poll numbers.
“People in general just will NOT,
take their heads out of the sand!”
Psyops, or psychological operations, is a term used to describe the
techniques of psychological manipulation used in warfare. These operations are used to deceive, confuse, disrupt
and demoralize the enemy, with an aim toward weakening enemy resistance or even causing enemy forces to surrender
and enemy populations to capitulate.
CNN Death Spiral: Special Report Dinosaur media outlet crumbling into obscurity
[VID]
by Infowars.com | November 9, 2014
The final death throes of the mainstream media collapsing are heralded by the recent dumping of CNN from
the Direct TV lineup. David Knight details the accelerating slide into ignominy by CNN, including the episodes of
fake news, controlled narratives and disingenuous coverage meant to manufacture consent rather than report the
truth.
Obama now admits Assad MUST go before ISIS can be defeated: President plans to focus on Syria and ousting brutal
dictator as he tries to beat back terror group http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic...
Lionel of LionelMedia.com joins us today for an epic discussion on fake stories in the media and
the manipulation of the historical record. We discuss the fake Syria sniper boy video, the Corbett/Lionel law,
and the importance of self-correction. As an added bonus, James reveals his biggest boner to the audience!
Who Owns The Media? The 6 Monolithic Corporations That
Control Almost Everything We Watch, Hear And Read
Back in 1983,
approximately50
corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the
United States. Today, ownership of the news media has been concentrated in the hands of just six incredibly
powerful media corporations. These corporate behemoths control most of what we watch, hear and read every single
day. They own television networks, cable channels, movie studios, newspapers, magazines, publishing houses, music
labels and even many of our favorite websites. Sadly, most Americans don't even stop to think about who is feeding
them the endless hours of news and entertainment that they constantly ingest. Most Americans don't really seem to
care about who owns the media. But they should. The truth is that each of us
isdeeply influenced by the messages that are constantly being pounded into our heads by the
mainstream media. The average American watches153 hours of television a month. In fact,
most Americans begin to feel physically uncomfortable if they go too long without watching or listening to
something. Sadly, most Americans have become absolutely addicted to news and entertainment and the ownership
of all that news and entertainment that we crave is being concentrated in fewer and fewer hands each
year.
The six corporations that collectively control U.S.
media today are Time Warner, Walt Disney, Viacom, Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., CBS Corporation and NBC Universal.
Together, the "big six" absolutely dominate news and entertainment in the United States. But even those areas of
the media that the "big six" do not completely control are becoming increasingly concentrated. For example, Clear
Channel now owns over 1000 radio stations across the United States. Companies like Google, Yahoo and Microsoft are
increasingly dominating the Internet.
But it is the "big six" that are the biggest
concerns. When you control what Americans watch, hear and read you gain a great deal of control over what they
think. They don't call it "programming" for nothing.
Back in 1983 it was bad enough that about 50
corporations dominated U.S. media. But since that time, power over the media has rapidly become concentrated in the
hands of fewer and fewer people....
In 1983, fifty corporations dominated most of
every mass medium and the biggest media merger in history was a $340 million deal. … [I]n 1987, the fifty companies
had shrunk to twenty-nine. … [I]n 1990, the twenty-nine had shrunk to twenty three. … [I]n 1997, the biggest firms
numbered ten and involved the $19 billion Disney-ABC deal, at the time the biggest media merger ever. … [In 2000]
AOL Time Warner’s $350 billion merged corporation [was] more than 1,000 times larger [than the biggest deal of
1983].
--Ben H. Bagdikian, The Media Monopoly, Sixth
Edition, (Beacon Press, 2000), pp. xx—xxi
"The most effectual engines forpacifying a nation are the public
papers...A despotic government alwayskeeps a kind of standing army of
newswriters who, without any regard to truth or to what should be like
truth,invent and put into the papers whatever might serve the ministers. This suffices with the
mass of the people who have no means of distinguishing the false from the true paragraphs of a newspaper." --
Thomas Jefferson to G. K. van Hogendorp, Oct. 13, 1785.
Today, six colossal media giants tower over all the
rest.
Much of the information in the chart below comes
frommediaowners.com. The chart below reveals only a small
fraction of the media outlets that these six behemoths actually own....
Time Warner
Home Box Office (HBO) Time Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. CW Network (partial ownership) TMZ New Line Cinema Time Warner Cable Cinemax Cartoon Network TBS TNT America Online MapQuest Moviefone Castle Rock Sports Illustrated Fortune Marie Claire People Magazine
Walt Disney
ABC Television Network Disney Publishing ESPN Inc. Disney Channel SOAPnet A Lifetime Buena Vista Home Entertainment Buena Vista Theatrical Productions Buena Vista Records Disney Records Hollywood Records Miramax Films Touchstone Pictures Walt Disney Pictures Pixar Animation Studios Buena Vista Games Hyperion Books
Viacom
Paramount Pictures Paramount Home Entertainment Black Entertainment Television (BET) Comedy Central Country Music Television (CMT) Logo MTV MTV Canada MTV2 Nick Magazine Nick at Nite Nick Jr. Nickelodeon Noggin Spike TV The Movie Channel TV Land VH1
News Corporation
Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Fox Television Stations The New York Post Fox Searchlight Pictures Beliefnet Fox Business Network Fox Kids Europe Fox News Channel Fox Sports Net Fox Television Network FX My Network TV MySpace News Limited News Phoenix InfoNews Channel Phoenix Movies Channel Sky PerfecTV Speed Channel STAR TV India STAR TV Taiwan STAR World Times Higher Education Supplement Magazine Times Literary Supplement Magazine Times of London 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment 20th Century Fox International 20th Century Fox Studios 20th Century Fox Television BSkyB DIRECTV The Wall Street Journal Fox Broadcasting Company Fox Interactive Media FOXTEL HarperCollins Publishers The National Geographic Channel National Rugby League News Interactive News Outdoor Radio Veronica ReganBooks Sky Italia Sky Radio Denmark Sky Radio Germany Sky Radio Netherlands STAR Zondervan
CBS Corporation
CBS News CBS Sports CBS Television Network CNET Showtime TV.com CBS Radio Inc. (130 stations) CBS Consumer Products CBS Outdoor CW Network (50% ownership) Infinity Broadcasting Simon & Schuster (Pocket Books, Scribner) Westwood One Radio Network
NBC Universal
Bravo CNBC NBC News MSNBC NBC Sports NBC Television Network Oxygen SciFi Magazine Syfy (Sci Fi Channel) Telemundo USA Network Weather Channel Focus Features NBC Universal Television Distribution NBC Universal Television Studio Paxson Communications (partial ownership) Trio Universal Parks & Resorts Universal Pictures Universal Studio Home Video
These gigantic media corporations do not exist to
objectively tell the truth to the American people. Rather, the primary purpose of their existence is to make
money.
These gigantic media corporations are not going to
do anything to threaten their relationships with their biggest advertisers (such as the largest pharmaceutical
companies that literally spend billions on advertising), and one way or another these gigantic media corporations
are always going to express the ideological viewpoints of their owners.
Fortunately, an increasing number of Americans are
starting to wake up and are realizing that the mainstream media should not be trusted.According
to a new poll just released by Gallup, the number of Americans that have
little to no trust in the mainstream media (57%) is at an all-time high.
That is one reason why we have seen the alternative
media experience such rapid growth over the past few years. The mainstream media has been losing credibility at a
staggering rate, and Americans are starting to look elsewhere for the truth about what is really going
on.
Sure there are a few courageous reporters in the
mainstream media that manage to slip a few stories past their corporate bosses from time to time, but in general
there is a very clear understanding that there are simply certain things that you just do not say in the mainstream
news.
But Americans are becoming increasingly hungry for
the truth, and they are becoming increasingly dissatisfied with the dumbed down pablum that is passing as "hard
hitting news" these days.
"I freed a thousand slaves; I
could have freed a thousand more,
if only they knew they were slaves."
Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who
are constantly and intelligently
on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic procedures.
"A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time,
not on the spot, not here and now and in their calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other
worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the
encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it.”