Former CFR member, Rear Admiral Chester Ward, stated regarding the group, "The most
powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common – they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United
States. A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall
Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily,
they want the world banking monopoly from
whatever power ends up in the control of global government."
**Please Give Page Time To Load**
Council on Foreign Relations Propaganda
Cassandra Anderson
Infowars.com
May 12, 2010
The Official CFR Commercial of
the"Think Tank" in
action
Official Video: About The Council on Foreign Relations
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an invitation
only membershipgroup made up of about 4000 people that comprise what many observers consider to bethe shadow
government of America. The CFR is more than a ‘think tank’, it is a network of elitists that control America by
creating policies, laws, financial alliances and monopolies. This new video, starring such diverse personalities as
Angelina Jolie and Zbigniew Brzezinski, promotes the CFR as a wonderful place where people meet to discuss policy,
thus giving the impression that all points of view are represented and implemented with the public’s best interests
at heart.
Some of its members include bankers
(Timothy Geithner, Henry Paulson, Alan Greenspan, Paul Volcker, and World Bank President Robert Zoellick),
Secretaries of State (Henry Kissinger, Condoleeza Rice, Hillary Clinton), Supreme Court Justices (Bader-Ginsberg
and Stephen Breyer), corporate titans (George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Dick Cheney), mainstream media (mainstream
media is manipulated by the CFR- Katie Couric, Bill Moyers, Diane Sawyer, Tom Brokaw), foreign heads of state
(Mikhail Gorbachev, Benyamin Netanyahu and Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe), religious leader (the Dalai Lama)and
entertainers (Shirley Temple, Angelina Jolie, Fred Thompson).
Some of the more notable corporations that enjoy CFR membership include AIG, BP, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs,
Google, Merck, NASDAQ, Pfizer and VISA.
The truth about the CFR is that it is a global agenda organizationfilled with collectivists who
advocatedepopulation and covert controlover America and the world. An example of this is the quote by Zbigniew Brzezinski (co-founder of the Trilateral
Commission and former US National Security Advisor):
“I once put it rather pungently, and I was flattered that the British Foreign Secretary repeated this, as
follows: … namely, in early times, it was easier to to control a million people, literally it was easier to control
a million people than physically to kill a million people. Today, it is infinitely easier to to kill a million
people than to control a million people. It is easier to kill than to control….”
Brzezinski’s statement does not advocate killing, but that he and his compatriots have given serious thought to
both options. The average auto mechanic does not ponder these things. Who does? Only those who have a self image of
being empowered to do either and, therefore, must make a choice.
David Rockefeller, honorary chairman of the CFR, he
is also the founder of the Trilateral Commission (a secretive members-only group with designs to remove the borders
between Canada, U.S. and Mexico in the pursuit of eventual world governance),his family founded the Population
Council (with its roots in eugenics, which is the philosophy of improving the human gene pool through selective
breeding, historically, it has sometimes been accomplished through brutal means such as forced sterilization and
genocide)and he is a banker, famous for this quote:
“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon
well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate
influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a
secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as
“internationalists” and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and
economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
This video is pure propaganda; it would seem incredible that some CFR members do not understand its true nature,
but may have been used for marketing and public relations purposes in this video.
G. Edward Griffin , who revealed the character
of the CFR in “The Capitalist Conspiracy” in 1971, said that due to the growing awareness of the CFR’s role in
leading America into global collectivist government, the CFR is attempting to brighten their tarnished image with
this public relations video. And it uses the same production style seen on TV ads selling pharmaceutical drugs. The
message is about learning, discussion and solutions, but omits commentary on their goals and methods.
A failed attempt to recruit Aaron Russo resulted
in recent light being shed on the CFR.
Several years
ago, after his popular video “Mad As Hell” was released and Aaron Russo began his campaign to become
Governor of Nevada, Russo was noticed by Nicholas Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney. Seeing
Russo’s passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the
elite’s CFR. Watch the full interview here: Reflections and Warnings.
The
Insiders: How and Why
America Is Being Betrayed John F. McManus
(2008)
Published on Jul 15, 2012
The President of The John Birch Society, John F. McManus, gives an updated presentation
of "who's who" and "who's doing what" in the plan to subvert America into a tyrannical global
government.
CFR Members And Bilderberg
Attendees Appointed By Donald Trump
(Taken from the CFR
membership and Bilderberg participant lists)
Elaine Chao, United States Secretary of Transportation (CFR
individual member)
Jay Clayton, Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(CFR corporate member)
Gary Cohn, Director of the National Economic Council (CFR
corporate member)
Jamie Dimon, Member of Strategic and Policy Forum (CFR
corporate member)
Jim Donovan, Deputy Treasury Secretary (CFR corporate
member)
Larry Fink, Member of Strategic and Policy Forum (CFR
corporate member)
Neil M. Gorsuch, Supreme Court Justice (individual CFR
member)
Vice Admiral Robert S. Harward, National Security Advisor
(declined appointment) (CFR corporate member)
Kevin Hassett, Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers (CFR
fellow traveler)
Robert Wood “Woody” JohnsonIV, United
States Ambassador to the United Kingdom (individual CFR member)
Robert Lighthizer, United States Trade Representative
(individual CFR member)
James Mattis, Secretary of Defense (Bilderberg attendee)
K.T. McFarland, Deputy National Security Adviser (individual
CFR member)
Linda McMahon, Administrator of the Small Business
Administration (CFR corporate member)
Army Lt. General HerbertRaymond “H. R.”
McMaster, National Security Advisor (individual CFR member, Bilderberg attendee)
Jim McNerney, Member of Strategic and Policy Forum (CFR
corporate member)
Steve Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury (CFR corporate
member)
Indra Nooyi, Member of Strategic and Policy Forum (CFR
corporate member, Bilderberg attendee)
Rick Perry, Secretary of Energy (Bilderberg attendee)
Dina Powell, Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategy
(CFR corporate member)
Ginni Rometty, Member of Strategic and Policy Forum (CFR
corporate member)
Wilbur Ross, Secretary of Commerce (Bilderberg attendee)
Stephen Schwarzman, Member of Strategic and Policy Forum (CFR
corporate member)
Patrick Shanahan, Deputy Secretary of Defense (CFR corporate
member)
Rex Tillerson, Secretary of State (CFR corporate member)
Jack Welch, Member of Strategic and Policy Forum (CFR
corporate member)
Heather Ann Wilson, Secretary of the Air Force (individual CFR
member)
THE TRUMP JONES DECEPTION
2
Under the rubric of Zionism, the dispossession of Palestinians and annexation of
their land has for decades been hidden in plain sight, along with Israeli apartheid and ethnic
cleansing. Though tourism flows in steadily to "The Holy Land," masking these egregious past and
present events from scrutiny, has been and is nothing short of Orwellian. The Zionist state of
Israel is a totalitarian state, whose ideologues' sentiments match those advocating world
government. As Rev. Chuck Baldwin exclaims, "For all intents and purposes, the Globalist agenda
(the New World Order, call it what you will) and the Zionist agenda, are one and the same." The
Trump Jones Deception 2, demonstrates this fact, and the way in which both Donald Trump and Alex
Jones are a part of it.
The Council on Foreign Relations, often described as the
"real state department", has launched an initiative to promote and implement a system of effective world
governance.
Henry Kissinger, a CFR member, anticipates that President Obama will, "…give
new impetus to American foreign policy partly because the reception of him is so extraordinary around
the world. I think his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when,
really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis."
The program, titled "The International Institutions
and Global Governance Program," utilizes the resources of the "…David Rockefeller Studies Program to
assess existing regional and global governance mechanisms…" The initial funding for the program came with a $6
million grant from the Robina Foundation,
which claims that the grant is "…one of the largest operating grants ever received in Council history."
The IIGG program, launched on May 1st,
2008, is the latest manifestation of an agenda that has existed since and before the founding of the
Council on Foreign Relations. Former CFR member, Rear Admiral Chester Ward, stated regarding the group,
"The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common – they want to bring about
the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States. A second clique of
international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents.
Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global
government."
The International Institutions and Global Governance Program identifies several "global issues"
that require a system of world governance. Environmental issues, terrorism, the global economy and energy are all
mentioned. The project then states that a system of "universal membership" could be pursued, or alternatively a
regional organization, such as the European Union model.
"In each of these spheres, the program will consider whether the most promising framework for governance is
a formal organization with universal membership (e.g., the United Nations); a regional or sub-regional
organization; a narrower, informal coalition of like-minded countries; or some combination of all three."
The programcalls for the "Re-conceptualizing" of national sovereignty, citing the European Union’s "pooling" of
sovereignty as a model. The CFR project recognizes that historically, the United States has been resistant to the
ideals of global governance. The project states, "Among the most important factors determining the future of global
governance will be the attitude of the United States…"
The IIGG program continues, "…few countries have been as sensitive as the United States to restrictions on their
freedom of action or as jealous in guarding their sovereign prerogatives." The program then states that the
separation of powers as stated in the Constitution, along with the U.S. Congress, stand in the way of the United
States assuming "new international obligations."
As stated,
"…the country’s longstanding tradition of liberal “exceptionalism” inspires U.S. vigilance in protecting the
domestic sovereignty and institutions from the perceived incursions of international bodies. Finally, the
separation of powers enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress a critical voice in the
ratification of treaties and endorsement of global institutions, complicates U.S. assumptions of new
international obligations."
The actions of the Military Industrial Complex under the Bush Administration have
served globalist interests well. "Global structures" are now presented as the mechanism to prevent
such atrocities. America’s demonization is central to building a system of world governance. Patrick M. Stewart,
who is currently the director of the CFR IIGG program, is anticipating the Obama administration "…to seek to turn
the page on what many perceived to be ‘cowboy unilateralism’ of the Bush years, by embracing multilateral
cooperation, re-kindling U.S. alliances and partnerships, and engaging in sustained diplomacy within the UN
framework," as reported
byXinhua. The IIGG
project itself stated in May of 2008 that, "Regardless of whether the administration that takes office in January
2009 is Democratic or Republican, the thrust of U.S. foreign policy is likely to be multilateral to a significant
degree."
Globalist forces are hard at work in the economic and political realms in an attempt to shape the future of the
world, furthering the dominance of the global elite. Calls for a global currency in response to the economic crisis
are regularly occurring, drawing the tacit support of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, speaking to the
CFR.
Henry Kissinger, a CFR member, anticipates that President Obama will, "…give new impetus to American foreign
policy partly because the reception of him is so extraordinary around the world. I think his task will be to
develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great
opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis."
The Council on Foreign Relations global governance program will undoubtedly be pursued under the Obama
administration, which is filled with CFR
members. President of the CFR, Richard Haass, is serving as
a top adviser to the Obama administration. As the IIGG program admits, regardless of who sits in the White House,
the globalist agenda moves forward full speed ahead.
This article was posted: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 at 11:54 am
The Trial Of Henry Kissinger
Part contemporary investigation and part
historical inquiry, documentary follows the quest of one journalist in search of justice. The film focuses on
Christopher Hitchens' charges against Henry Kissinger as a war criminal - allegations documented in Hitchens' book
of the same title - based on his role in countries such as Cambodia, Chile, and Indonesia. Kissinger's story raises
profound questions about American foreign policy and highlights a new era of human rights. Increasing evidence
about one man's role in a long history of human rights abuses leads to a critical examination of American diplomacy
through the lens of international standards of justice. Written by Sujit R. Varma. The film focuses on Henry
Kissinger and his role in America's secret bombing of Cambodia in 1969, the approval of Indonesia's genocidal
assault on East Timor in 1975, the assassination of a Chilean general in 1970, and his involvement in the 1969
Paris peace talks concerning the Vietnam Conflict.
Top New World Order
Quotes
[vid]
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other
great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for
almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been
subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and
prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world
bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." David Rockefeller
[June, 1991]
Infowars Nightly News reporter Aaron Dykes visits the birthplace of
the world's most notorious secret society, the Illuminati, in the heart of Bavaria, Germany. Professor Adam
Weishaupt began his pursuit of world government by deception at the University of Ingolstadt on May 1, 1776, while
preserved historical documents make clear that the Illuminati is not a myth but proven fact. Moreover, their 18th
Century model for covert conquest continues today in new forms, under different names,
in pursuit of a New World Order.
Albert Pike served as a Brigadier-General in the Confederate Army. Following the War, Pike was
jailed for treason, He was quickly pardoned by fellow Freemason President Andrew Johnson. Among eventually becoming
a 33rd degree mason and a top leader of the Ku Klux Klan, Pike was also believed to be a Luciferian. He claimed he
was able to summon Lucifer at will as the Grand Master of the Order of the Palladium. Palladism or
TRADITIONAL SATANISM, an ancient Luciferian cult was then introduced to the inner circle of the Masonic
lodges. This influence has flourished into modern day freemasonry in the hidden rites of the upper degrees. Leaders
of Industry, Entertainment,The CIA, Congress, and our military leaders are inundated with freemasonic Palladism or
a Luciferian New World Order. It’s everywhere you look in Washington DC if you have eyes that see. What follows are
the chilling predictions or instructions of Albert Pike’s Three World Wars, funded in great part by the House of
Rothschild, from a letter that he wrote to 33 degree Italian Illuminati head and Mafia founder Giuseppe Mazzini,
dated August 15, 1871.
John Birch Society on the Illuminati and the New World
Order
Invisible Empire Sneak Peek #1
- The Council on Foreign Relations -
[vid]
Here is a sneak peek into the powerful new documentary Invisible Empire, directed by Jason
Bermas. Researcher G. Edward Griffin examines the roots of the New World Order through the Council on Foreign
Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, and other key branches of the Cecil Rhodes' Secret
Societies that aim to steer the world towards global government.
Invisible Empire - Sneak Peek #2
- The Dumbed-Down Public -
[vid]
In this sneak peek, director Jason Bermas demonstrates the mindset of the elite, who have flooded the public's
attention span with gladiatorial events, spectator sports and mind-numbing entertainment. This deluge of
distractions effectively hides the truth of political information and world events from the public
consciousness.
Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who
are constantly and intelligently
on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic procedures.
"A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time,
not on the spot, not here and now and in their calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other
worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the
encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it.”
For the first time ever, the secret agenda of the planet’s ruthless Super-class is exposed in
stark detail. This documentary film chronicles how men of power and influence have worked in
stealth for centuries to establish an oppressive world government. Learn how this global
oligarchy controls the populace through drug trafficking, money laundering, staged terror
attacks, media propaganda and debt. The criminal controllers have successfully dominated
the globe and are now in the final phase of consolidating
power. Invisible Empire: A New World Order
Definedis a damning
indictment of the globalists through their own words and documents. Worldwide tyranny isn’t
coming — it’s here.
This isn’t conspiracy theory, it’s conspiracy fact. The New World Order is out in the open, all
documented in stunning living color. Unelected bureaucrats are establishing regional
unions under one superstate. Witness their plan for a global tax and a cashless
surveillance society in which every man, woman and child is micro-chipped at
birth.
Invisible Empire will be more than just a film — it is the culmination of years of
research by Jason Bermas into the inner-workings and most revealing public statements by the
New World Order and the most trusted stewards of their dark vision. Invisible Empire promises to unveil the long-term
agenda for world control, just as Fabled
Enemies and Loose Change Final
Cut forever stripped away the facade of the official story of 9/11 and exposed the dark
truth that lies behind.
Does America have a hidden oligarchy? Is U.S. foreign policy run by a closed shop? What is the
CFR (Council on Foreign Relations)? It began in 1921 as a front organization for J.P. Morgan and Company. By World
War II it had acquired unrivaled influence on American foreign policy. Hundreds of U.S. government administrators
and diplomats have been drawn from its ranks - regardless of which party has occupied the White House. But what
does the Council on Foreign Relations stand for? Why do the major media avoid discussing it? What has been its
impact on America's past - and what is it planning for the future?
Meet The CFR With G Edward
Griffin
Jason Bermas
First published at 20:51 UTC on September 3rd, 2019
Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Timeby Carroll Quigley is the ultimate insider
admission of a secret global elite that has impacted nearly every modern historical event.
Learn how the Anglo-American banking elite were able to secretly establish and maintain their
global power. This massive hardcover book of 1348 pages provides a detailed world history
beginning with the industrial revolution and imperialism through two world wars, a global
depression and the rise of communism.Tragedy & Hopeis the definitive work on the world's power
structure and an essential source material for understanding the history, goals and actions of
the New World Order.
Author Carroll Quigley was an esteemed professor of
history at the Foreign Service School of Georgetown University and also taught at Princeton and at
Harvard. President Bill Clinton was a student of Quigley and named him as an important
influence. As a trusted and well respected insider, Professor Quigley had access to a variety of
secret papers and sources from which he did his research forTragedy & Hope.
One of the key revelations Quigley reveals is a
secret organization created by Englishman Cecil Rhodes. Rhodes was the founder of diamond company
De Beers, ardent supporter of British colonialism and creator of the prestigious Rhodes Scholarship
that has since educated so many global elite leaders. Funded by Rhodes' estate,
the
goal of this organization was to consolidate world control into the hands of the English speaking
elites. This book ties together how this secret organization of global elites has quietly steered
the world towards a goal of global government using collectivism.
As an insider with access to many secret documents,
Quigley was proud of the achievements of this secret organization and wrote this book from that
viewpoint. The book was intended to only be read by fellow academics and other insider
intellectuals that shared a similar world view. The book was quickly taken out of print when it
became more widely circulated and opponents latched onto it as a confession of the global elite.
As pressure mounted, the publishers relented and authorized this identical reissue edition.
This book continues to provide one of the most revealing looks into the goals and methodology of the
global elite. This book is printed in limited quantities and not readily available at most
mainstream bookstores. Infowars is proud to have secured a batch of Tragedy & Hope and to help spread this valuable
history and information.
Quotes from Tragedy & Hope:
"The powers of financial
capitalism had [a] far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in
private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a
whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting
in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and
conferences." -- Carroll Quigley, Chapter
20.
"There does
exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile
network.I know of the operations
of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in
the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most
of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I
have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies ... but in general my
chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in
history is significant enough to be known." --Carroll
Quigley, Chapter 65.
“N
ow, as I mentioned before the total membership of this group is approximately 4,000 people. There are a
lot of organizations, a lot of church organizations in your home town that have that many members or
more. Now wouldn’t you be surprised that if you were to discover that if the members of just that one
local church, dominated American politics and corporate structures, and communications, and
universities, that they were controlling the Unites States, just that one little group…wouldn’t you be
amazed?! Would you wonder what was going on? Wouldn’t you start asking some questions? It would be
pretty hard however for you to get answers to those questions, if it turned out that the
media and the channels through which those questions would be
asked and answered, were controlled by members of that same church. And that’s essentially the
kind of situation that we have facing America today.”
Early last year, the Swiss Propaganda Research center (SPR) published information cementing into place something
many of us already know—the “mainstream” corporate media is controlled by the Council on Foreign Relations.
“It is no secret that over the last 4 decades, mainstream media has been consolidated from dozens of competing
companies to only six,” writes Matt
Agorist of The Free Thought Project. “Hundreds of channels, websites, news outlets, newspapers, and
magazines, making up ninety percent of all media is controlled by very few people—giving Americans the illusion of
choice… Top journalists and executives from all major media companies are integrated into the CFR.”
Council on Foreign Relations links to major media
holdings
“[Frank] Wisner and [Allen] Dulles (the latter even when not in the government) were powerful because of their
central position in the New York overworld of law, banking, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the New York
Social Register,” writes Scott.
“In its first years the CIA, like OSS before it, was dominated internally by the aristocratic elements of the
New York overworld. All seven of the known deputy directors of the CIA at the time came from the same New York
legal and financial circles, and no less than six of these seven (including both Dulles and Wisner) were listed in
the New York Social Register as well.”
[O]ur nation does indeed have, like its British cousins across the pond, an Establishment,
complete with its own theological canon and doxology of statecraft and spy craft. Its “Vatican” is the Council
on Foreign Relations. Its primary source of treasure and alms has been the Morgan and Rockefeller
financial empires, which created the Fed, the great enabler of the Welfare-Warfare State. Many of its
elite seminarians have studied at Ivy League institutions such as Harvard, Princeton, or Columbia; some in
particular, at Yale where they were initiated into Skull and Bones.
This cabal of financial “overlords,” as Scott might have it, congregated at the CFR, is responsible for the
“news” we consume daily, often without question or suspicion.
“The narrative created by CFR and its cohorts is picked up by their secondary communicators, also known the
mainstream media, who push it on the populace with no analysis or questioning,” writes Agorist.
The plan to control the thoughts and opinions of the masses through media came to fruition in 1915. Congressman
Oscar Callaway pointed this out two years later. His remarks were published in the Congressional Record of
February 9, 1917, page 2947:
In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their
subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the
most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy
of the daily press. They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. An
agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was
furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness,
militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the
interests of the purchasers.
The CIA’s effort to consolidate and expand this hold on media tightened in the 1950s under what has become known
as Operation Mockingbird. This effort to control information was later admitted in a CIA document.
“Although it is a document outlining their desire to become more open and transparent, the deception outlined by
various whistleblowers (
example) requires us to read between the lines and recognize that the relationships shared between intelligence
agencies and our sources of information are not always warranted and pose inherent conflicts of interest,” writes
Arjun Walia.
How many of us actually read between the lines? Not many, although the number is growing as it becomes obvious a
hidden elite and its national security state apparatus—the CIA, the Pentagon, the NSA, and associated contractors
and supposed NGOs—is skewering the “news” to provide various pretexts for endless war and mass murder that enrich
the elite and their top-level cronies.
The torture of Julian Assange and the mistreatment of whistleblowers and genuine investigative journalists—the
latter grew
considerably under the “Change and Hope” phony Barack Obama—sends a strong message: if you reveal the secret
crimes of the state and its financial overlords, you will pay a heavy price.
The Quigley Formula - G. Edward Griffin lecture -
Uploaded on Jan 11, 2012
An excellent lecture by G. Edward Griffin
entitled "The Quigley Formula: A conspiratorial view of history as taught by the conspirators themselves"
"Quigley" is the late Carroll Quigley, a Council on Foreign Relations member and historian, as well
as mentor to CFR & Trilateral Commission member Bill Clinton.
The lecture is based around the following quote from his book Tragedy & Hope, pp.
1247-1248:
"The National parties and their presidential candidates, with the Eastern Establishment assiduously
fostering the process behind the scenes, moved closer together and nearly met in the center with almost identical
candidates and platforms, although the process was concealed as much as possible, by the revival of obsolescent or
meaningless war cries and slogans (often going back to the Civil War)....The argument that the two parties should
represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea
acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so
that the American people can "throw the rascals out" at any election without leading to any profound or extreme
shifts in policy. ... Either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired,
unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the
other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic
policies."
Description
The Anglo-American Establishment (paperback, 354 page) is the follow-up
to author Carroll Quigley's major tome Tragedy & Hope. In the
book he specifically discusses a secret society created by the great imperialist Cecil Rhodes and how
it was administered after Rhodes' death by Lord Alfred Milner. This group operated behind the
scenes and gained massive influence over the world. Learn how the New World Order and global
government's roots stem directly from the British Empire.
Author Carroll Quigley (1910-1977) was a highly esteemed professor at Georgetown University. The
evidence he presents here is credible, the analysis brilliant. His scholarly approach and
presentation of facts will appeal to both the academically-oriented person as well as the truth seeker
who aspires to understand the world around us.
This quote from the book best describes what is discussed:
"No country that values its safety should allow what the Milner
group accomplished--that is, that a small number of men would be able to wield such power in
administration and politics, shoud be given almost complete control over the publication of documents
relating to their actions, should be able to exercise such influence over the avenues of information
that create public opinion, and should be able to monopolize so completely the writing and the teaching
of the history of their own period." --Carroll Quigley, The
Anglo-American Establishment.
The Deep End episode 006 features an interview with author Joseph Plummer on his recent book
"Tragedy and Hope 101: The Illusion of Justice, Freedom and Democracy" which summarizes Carroll Quigley's "The
Anglo-American Establishment" and "Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time". You can get Joe's book
at: http://joeplummer.com/tragedy-and-hop...
Notes, References, and Links for this interview: https://www.tragedyandhope.com/the-de...
To Learn more, search the History Blueprint as you digest this interview: https://webbrain.com/brainpage/brain/...
To Purchase the History Blueprint: https://www.tragedyandhope.com/the-br...
Clocking in at 1300 pages of small print text, Carroll Quigley's seminal work, Tragedy and Hope,
is an intimidating and weighty tome. Today we talk to Joe Plummer of JoePlummer.com about his guide to Quigley's
massive book. Available as a free e-book or as a paperback or kindle purchase and dubbed Tragedy and Hope 101,
Plummer's guide condenses, summarizes, explains and footnotes the highlights and lowlights of the text so you can
understand the nature of the conspiratorial network that Quigley exposed and why this information is so
important.
--Perhaps most disturbing to those who still believe in things like representative government,
Quigley reveals that real power operates behind the scenes, in secrecy, and with little to fear from so-called
elections. We learn that conspiracies, secret societies, and small, powerful "networks" of individuals are not only
real; they're extremely effective at creating or destroying entire nations and shaping the world as a whole.
These disturbing truths contradict nearly everything we've been taught to believe about our
system of government and social organization. As such, many people will simply dismiss them out of hand. "Only
wild-eyed conspiracy theorists believe such nonsense," they will say. And the social engineers, who encourage
public ignorance and shape public opinion, will assure them that they're right. But there is one problem: Carroll
Quigley was no wild-eyed conspiracy theorist.
Is "democracy" just a carefully managed con game? Professor Quigley not only spent decades
researching and writing about those who secretly control the machinery of our “representative governments,” he was
permitted to examine their secret papers. He was invited in, but he ultimately betrayed their trust when he exposed
their plans and their methods.
"Tragedy and Hope 101 was an attempt to expose the fraudulent political system itself because
that is so important for people to understand that it is fraudulent and it was created specifically to confuse them
to make them believe that it is a representative government that they have some hand in it. But Quigley shows step
by step how these people created that fraud and how they exploit everybody by continuing to lead them to believe
that they have some say in it."
"Brotherhood of Darkness" by Dr. Stanley Monteith. The story in this book is
incredible but true. It is about secret societies, how they have directed the course of civilization, and how they
influence your life today. Most people don't realize they exist because their minds have been conditioned to reject
any thought of such organizations. In this book, Dr. Monteith reveals the amazing facts he discovered in his almost
40 years of research. He reveals the identity of the mysterious forces behind the men who rule the world, and why
some of our leaders have dedicated their lives to destroying our nation. After reading Brotherhood of Darkness, you
will never look at the world in the same way again.
Jay Dyer on Tragedy & Hope 1: Bankster
Revolutions (Half)
Jay Dyer
Published on May 29, 2016
It's time! The first lecture series to cover the entirety of Dr. Carroll Quigley's
immense Tragedy & Hope. Here in part 1 we cover the banksters' scams leading up to World War I,
including gold certificates, how revolutionary ideals of classical liberalism were in fact bankster
ideals, how false flags and a planned assassination led to World War I and ultimately who the true
"Illuminati" were perpetrating these machinations. A series you won't want to miss! This is the
first half of talk no. 1, while the full talks and archives can be obtained by subscribing to
JaysAnalysis for 4.95 a month or 60.00 a year at the PayPal links at JaysAnalysis.com
Tragedy and Hope and Economics
By: Jay Dyer I had a lengthy argument with one of my professors the other day. I
was told there is no Bildergerg Group, nor is there a Trilateral Commission, and they do not plan
for a world government and single world currency. Not only is this obvious to anyone who watches
even the mainstream news, for someone in academia, it's embarrassing, inasmuch as the library I
work in has an entire row of works dedicated to globalism, globalization and globalist policy. In
this exchange I happened to have Carroll Quigley's Tragedy and Hope on me, so I took it out and
promptly read the famous quote from the well-known section: "There does exist, and has existed for
a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the
radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the
Round Table Group has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, of any other groups, and
frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty
years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret
records.
Jay Dyer on Tragedy & Hope 2:
Golden Bank for International Shakedowns (Half)
Jay Dyer
Published on Jun 8, 2016
This is the first free hour of my talk in Quigley's Tragedy and Hope where we cover
the next few chapters dealing with World War I and the reparations on Germany as a cloak for Global
Government by the true "Inner Circle" of Illuminists and a one world order through the BIS, and the
lead-up to World War II. For full talks, subscribe to JaysAnalysis at the PayPal link at my site
for 4.95 a month or 60.00 a year.
Jay on Tragedy & Hope 3:
Stalin, Hitler, Illuminism & the Occult Empire (Half)
Jay Dyer
Published on Jun 23, 2016
Lecture 3 of my series on the entirety of Quigley's Tragedy and Hope takes us into
the period of the Bolshevik Revolution and the rise of Stalinism, as well as the rise of Hitler and
the Nazis. In this talk, I cover Quigley's thesis, as well as my own insights about the occult
dimensions of these buildups (he leaves out). Compared to Kerry Bolton's essay, we can understand
how Russia and Germany were both Imperial problems for the Atlanticists, and how both needed to be
destroyed for the success of the Western shadow empire, an occult empire. Subscribe at
JaysAnalysis.com at the PayPal link for the full talks and access to my archives.
Jay Dyer on Tragedy & Hope 4: Rothschilds, Central Banks, FDR &
the Liberal Imperium (Half)
Jay Dyer
Published on Jul 20, 2016
Picking up where we left off in part 3, we look at Quigley's analysis of Germany
prior to World War II and the rise of Nazism, the situation in France with the dominance of the
Catholic, Protestant and Jewish banking houses, and how Rothschild came out on top. We also look at
how all three of these colluded to establish a fake front known as the Bank of France at the behest
of their agent, Napoleon. Revolutions lead to consolidation and the establishment of a central
bank, where the "Great Leader" hands the nation's assets and future capital over to the bankers.
Sound familiar? You're correct - FDR does the same thing, as Quigley explains. From there we look
at the sections where Quigley details the third way convergence and the coming technocratic global
state and how the revolutions, from Protestantism to Darwinism, prepared the way for the Liberal
Imperium.
Jay Dyer on Tragedy & Hope 5:
UK PsyOps, Hitler & the Axis Powers (Half)
Jay Dyer
Published on Aug 3, 2016
This is the first half of a 2 hour lecture which can be obtained by subscribing at
the PayPal links at JaysAnalysis.com. In this first free hour of the 5th lecture, we discuss the
causes of World War II according to Dr. Carroll Quigley, particularly as appear to be arranged by
the RIIA and Chatham House. This same Atlanticist network simultaneously appeased Hitler ("Peace in
Our Time") while hyping fears of Germany using fake and staged news. Meanwhile, they organized the
US participation in the war through deception (Pearl Harbor) and their man, Bill Donovan. Asia also
comes into play, as China and Japan experience westernization, communism and democracy - in other
words, banking elite rule their nations, too.
Jay Dyer - Tragedy & Hope 6:
World War 2 & the Cold War Symphony (Half)
Jay Dyer
Published on Aug 28, 2016
Here, we pick up where part 5 left off in the long drudgery of World War 2.
Hitler's moves were coaxed by the western powers, leading to a new boogey man that would envelop
the globe in a total reengineering of order. From a 3 bloc to a 2 bloc world, the "new war order"
was like nothing before it, leading to the Cold War and the scientific dictatorship.
Jay Dyer on Tragedy & Hope 7:
Cold War Psy Ops & the Bomb Almighty (Half)
Jay Dyer
Published on Oct 23, 2016
We continue the 7th lecture with the rise of the military industrial complex, the
Cold War and its massive espionage apparatus, the psychological warfare behind the “bomb almighty,”
as well as the real Illuminati again peeking through the pages of Quigley to reveal their faces.
This is one of the most important sections of Tragedy and Hope – a must-listen!
Trump, Tragedy & Hope Pt. 8:
The Philosophy of Globalism - Conclusion (Half)
Jay Dyer
Published on Nov 11, 2016
We conclude the Tragedy & Hope lectures with the timely election of Donald
Trump which eerily parallels the Goldwater era. The first half of the talk discusses the race and
what Trump symbolizes, while the second half for subscribers closes out the final chapters of Dr.
Quigley's monumental tome.
This is an excerpt from my documentary "The Chosen Ones" Please help
support my efforts :)
N A T I O N A L D E B T ! ! ! ! ! !
How Zionist Israel is Robbing America
Blind!
First published at 01:15 UTC on September 6th, 2019.
It doesn't matter if you are a hard-working American. YOU are not
entitled to keep your own income. YOU are a cash cow for the Zionist state of Israel. America's labor force is
Israel's Golden Goose. And I am going
to show you the financial statistics to prove it.
Now, stop and think, folks. The U.S. has dropped 200,000 bombs (the
number is probably greater than that by now) on seven Middle Eastern countries—each country
comparable in size to the states of Alaska, Texas, California, and Washington State. Try and
imagine seven states in the U.S. having 200,000 bombs dropped on them. Think of the death and
destruction that we Americans are supporting with our tax dollars. How many innocent people are
killed with each bomb and missile? Conservative estimates calculate that hundreds of thousands of
innocent people have been killed (and how many more wounded and maimed?) in America’s phony “war on
terror.”
Elite group calls for blatant violation of Posse Comitatus
Act
Steve Watson
Infowars.com
June 4, 2012
The Council On Foreign Relations, the elite think tank
long associated with globalist policy making and subversion of the principles of the US Constitution, has published
an article that proposes using the army to plan and carry out domestic law enforcement missions in the US.
An article in the May/June issue of the CFR official journal, Foreign Affairs, calls
for the army to address “challenges in the United States itself” with the justification being to protect
Americans from terrorist attacks.
The article, written by Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, General Raymond T. Odierno states:
“Where appropriate we will also dedicate active-duty
forces, especially those with niche skills and equipment, to provide civilian officials with a robust set of
reliable and rapid response options.”
Odierno suggests that major changes within the US now deem it necessary to use the military in such a way. The
General points to “declining budgets due to the country’s worsened fiscal situation”; “a shift in emphasis to the
Asia-Pacific region”; and a “broadening of focus from counterinsurgency, counterterrorism, and training of partners
to shaping the strategic environment, preventing the outbreak of dangerous regional conflicts, and improving the
army’s readiness to respond in force to a range of complex contingencies worldwide.”
Odierno suggests that the army be “transitioned” into a more “flexible force” by deploying in situations
normally reserved for domestic law enforcement officials. He argues that by doing so, troops will be better
equipped to deal with conflict elsewhere.
Odierno also specifically singles out The Army National Guard and the Army Reserve, noting “Today’s army also
has an unprecedented level of integration between its active and its reserve components… Our reserve component
soldiers are better than they have ever been, and we will dedicate resources to ensure that some of them will be
either deployed or ready to deploy around the globe.”
The article presents a red flag to anyone who has followed the consistent push by the federal government to
militarize the police and further integrate the armed forces into domestic law enforcement.
Of course, the use of U.S. troops in law enforcement duties is a complete violation of the Posse Comitatus Act
and the Insurrection Act, which substantially limit the powers of the federal government to use the military for
law enforcement unless under precise and extreme circumstances.
Section 1385 of the Posse Comitatus Act states,
“Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress,
willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”
However, despite the constitutional protections outlined in these laws, there has been and is an ongoing push to
blur the divisions between military and domestic law enforcement officials.
National Guard troops are routinely involved in ‘urban warfare training’ drills. Usually such drills take place
within the confines of military bases, however, more recently heavily armed troops are increasingly seen
patrolling residential neighborhoods and even the downtown areas of major
US cities.
Such “invasions” are often reported on as nothing to worry about and even
as “cool.”
Indeed, back in 2008 the Washington
Post reported how 20,000 U.S. troops returning from Iraq would be stationed inside America under Northcom
for purposes of “domestic security” from September 2011 onwards.
As Alex Jones exposed back in the late 1990’s, U.S. troops have been training to impose martial law for a
considerable amount of time. During numerous urban warfare drills that Jones attended and reported on, troops were
trained to raid, arrest, and imprison U.S. citizens in detention camps as well as taking over public buildings and
running checkpoints. During role playing exercises, actors playing prisoners would scream “I’m an American citizen,
I have rights” as they were being dragged away by troops.
Federal authorities in the United States have clearly been preparing for domestic civil unrest for a number of
years. The
Department of Homeland Security recently purchased a staggering 450 million rounds of hollow point bullets
as well as bullet-proof checkpoint booths that include ‘stop and go’ lights.
In addition, worrying legislation such as the National
Defense Authorization Act, has paved the way for the incarceration of American citizens under military laws,
and numerous leaked and semi-secret documents position the army as partners to domestic federal agencies in
quelling unrest in America and even engaging in missions
involving the “resettlement” of US citizens.
—————————————————————-
Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.net, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of
Politics at The University of Nottingham in England.
The more impoverished
the nation gets, the more society will break down, and then Americans will welcome a militarized police force.
Detroit Appeals To UN For
Humanitarian Assistance
Several groups appealed to the UN on Wednesday to assist in
providing affordable water to the residents of Detroit.In March, the bankrupt city sent 45,000 shutoff notices to residents
with overdue bills. So far, nearly
3,000 have had their water service terminated, and many more fear they are next. RTs Manila Chan has
more details on the circumstances oftheplea for help.
The History of NAFTA and the Council on Foreign
Relations
“People in general just will NOT, take
their heads out of the sand!”
Psyops, or psychological operations, is a term used to describe the
techniques of psychological manipulation used in warfare. These operations are used to deceive, confuse, disrupt
and demoralize the enemy, with an aim toward weakening enemy resistance or even causing enemy forces to surrender
and enemy populations to capitulate.
In this premier episode of The Geopolitical Report with Kurt Nimmo, we examine Google’s Jigsaw,
an emerging technology that will be used on the internet to counter speech and ideas considered “extremist” by the
global elite. Initially beta tested on radical Islamists, we demonstrate how Google and its partners plan to
leverage the technology to marginalize and ultimately eliminate opposition to the establishment.
The three major topics of Smart Cities are infrastructure, connectivity and Internet of Things. Wherever you see or
hear these words, you are touching Technocracy. Trump has already pledged to rebuild the nation’s infrastructure,
and he has appointed two infrastructure specialists to his cabinet: Elaine Chao as Secretary of
Transportation and Rick Perry as Secretary of Energy. Both were heavily involved in the
execution of George W. Bush’s North American Union scheme with Mexico and
Canada.
- TN Editor, (Article) Will Trump Appease Technocrats By Focusing On Funding Smart Cities? By By: Michael
Provenzano February 26, 2017 -
The Infrastructure Angle
"...We need to see their plans...If the infrastructure that they're working on now - using tax payer money - is
being done in order to implement Technocracy: we're screwed."
"...We need to get on this you know, figure this out before they actually slam the door on
us."
Patrick Wood, Video:How Technocracy ENSLAVED The World - The Real Deep State
How Technocracy
ENSLAVED The World - The Real Deep State (with Patrick Wood) -
(Excerpt From Video)
"We know the
history very well now about how the federal reserve was created and in other nations as well - how things work
with the central bank and so on. The federal reserve was created in 1913, and we know what they've done - how
much value of the currency they've extracted from their fraudulent activities over the years right? Most
recent estimates is something like 98 and a half percent since 1913. Now it's little over a hundred years
right? They've extracted, or skimmed, or trimmed, or cut, or whatever you want to call it, about almost a
hundred percent of the value of the currency that they started with. Now how long can they keep this game
going? If it were your game would you conclude at some point?...You know guys this is going to come to an end;
there's a limit, there's a finite limit to where we can keep this scam going before we have to just throw in
the towel and dump it all and go do something else.' There's historical precedence for this too we've seen
this happen in history. Now if the global elite with the central banking system has figured out it's time to
change courses, right? The only thing left to grab - they wanted money first, they thought money was wealth;
money is not wealth it is transient it can burn up, governments can go bankrupt, you know currencies can go
belly up. The only thing left to do is to grab all the resources. That's what Rockefeller set out to do in
1973 I believe, and that's what sustainable development is all about: is to take resources offline from the
people and put it into kind of a global common trust if you will where the cronies can get at it but you
can't. Right? So there is this pressure right now I think within the global elite themselves to say there is a
major sea change coming. The central banks may well soon be thrown under the bus as a result - as the way we
know it today at least, the structure today. They may well all be thrown under the bus: if technocracy can get
a hold. Right? If it can get into a place where it's got enough strategic requirements taken care of, there
will come a day when they can flip the switch: game-over over here, game-on over here. This is what disturbs
me the most."
Patrick Wood: Technocracy Rising Interview (Part 1 of 3)
Tragedy and Hope
Published on Sep 11, 2015
Patrick Wood: Technocracy Rising Interview (Part 2 of
3)
Tragedy and Hope
Published on Sep 11, 2015
Patrick Wood: Technocracy Rising Interview (Part 3 of 3)
Tragedy and Hope
Published on Sep 11, 2015
Author Patrick Wood discusses his recent book "Technocracy
Rising", in a 3-part interview. (Summary of parts, below) http://www.technocracyrising.com/
Patrick Wood is an author and lecturer who has studied elite globalization policies
since the late 1970's, when he partnered with the late Antony C. Sutton to coauthor Trilaterals
Over Washington, Volumes I and II. He remains a leading expert on the elitist Trilateral
Commission, their policies and achievements in creating their self-proclaimed "New International
Economic Order.”
An economist by education, a financial analyst and writer by profession and an
American Constitutionalist by choice, Wood maintains a Biblical world view and has deep historical
insights into the modern attacks on sovereignty, property rights and personal freedom. Such attacks
are epitomized by the implementation of U.N. policies such as Agenda 21, Sustainable Development,
Smart Growth and in education, the widespread adoption of Common Core.
Wood is a frequent speaker and guest on radio shows around the nation. His current
research builds on Trilateral Commission hegemony, focusing on Transhumanism, Technocracy and
scientism, and how these are co-opting economics, politics and religion around the world.
Part 1: Energy based Currency, Columbia University origins of
Technocracy, Eugenics, Population Control, and Agenda 21, origins of Positivism and Scientism;
Part 2: Trilaterals, CFR, Rockefellers, U.N., 1992 Rio Conference, Agenda 21
and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP);
Part 3: Wood's work with Antony C. Sutton, the Origins of the Trilateral
Commission, Trilaterals and Larry King, and how the Trilateral Commission influenced the U.S. Govt.
since 1973 to present day. Thanks to Ernie & Donna Hancock at FreedomsPhoenix.com for the use
of their studio, and to Rick Malchow for his assistance in bringing you this interview.
Technocracy Endgame Confirmed
Technocracy In America: The Rise of the Info-StateIn January
2017, leading globalist scholar Dr. Parag Khanna published a book, Technocracy in America: Rise of the Info-State,
that emphatically declares America’s need for a ‘direct Technocracy’. Among other things, he calls for
the abandonment of the Senate and for the Supreme Court to directly modify the Constitution as it sees
fit.
Khanna believes in a borderless world where global Smart Cities
and mega-regions will be connected to create a global society, or a giant city-state.
"...All The Trilateral companies that were
associated at that time with the Trilateral Commission, they made a stampede rush to China to build infrastructure
in China. They built the highways, they built the bridges, they built the dams, they built all the stuff that you
need to do business if you will. They were the ones that set up China. Lo and behold, by the year 2000 came along
at least, Time magazine wrote an article that pointed out that China was a Technocracy. And okay, now how did that
happen? Well Brzezinski - clearly in my mind as you look back on it, a little forensic analysis - Brzezinski
purposely brought China in as a model of Technocracy...So they converted China over the couple decades into a
Technocracy. And even today China is acting like a Technocracy: not a communist dictatorship. Very few people have
picked up on this. But this is important to notice because what's happened to American manufacturing jobs?...It was
a purposeful thing to set China up to suck America dry...We've seen this happen time and time again, a certain
privacy invading technology gets invented in America. It's illegal to do it in America. There's laws against it,
they can't exercise that sort of stuff. So, these supposedly quote unquote American companies, they sneak over to
China where it's perfectly legal and they welcome them with open arms. They go over there and they prove their
technology - their spying, surveillance, whatever technology. And when they get it all done on the Chinese people,
then they just you know find ways to sneak it back into the United States to start applying it here. But they
couldn't do the testing here. So they test it over there and prove it, and then they brought it back and now we're
getting it, and they keep shoving it down our throat..."
"If you were a chess player you would say, 'You know, we need a global sponsor, a strongman sponsor for Technocracy
in order to make Technocracy work for the whole world, where we can get a hold of everything - put everything in
our pocket: all the resources.' They use China that way, I'm convinced of that now because they and they alone are
the only ones who did all that stuff to China. They started it out."
Zbigniew Brzezinski on Right
- Patrick Wood, Video: How Technocracy ENSLAVED The World - The Real Deep State
-
When the first edition of The Media Monopoly was published in 1983, critics called Ben
Bagdikian's warnings about the chilling effects of corporate ownership and mass advertising on the nation's news
"alarmist." Since then, the number of corporations controlling most of America's daily newspapers, magazines, radio
and television stations, book publishers, and movie companies has dwindled from fifty to ten
to five.
Published on Apr 22, 2015
After the CIA recruits a 15 year old girl to lie to congress about baby killers from
Iraq, celebrities across the U.S. rally for war. Meanwhile CNN launches a collection of fake news broadcasts and
Whitney Houston wows the nation
with her Super Bowl performance of the National Anthem.
THE
CIA
An independent agency of the United States government responsible
for collecting and coordinating intelligence and counterintelligence activities abroad in the national interest;
headed by the Director of Central Intelligence under the supervision of the President and National Security
Council...There has been considerable criticism of the CIA relating to security and counterintelligence failures,
failures in intelligence analysis, human rights concerns, external investigations and document releases,
influencing public opinion and law enforcement, drug trafficking, and lying to Congress. In 1987, the former CIA
Station Chief in Angola in 1976, John Stockwell, said the CIA is responsible for tens of thousands of covert
actions and destablization programs since it was created by Congress with the passage
of the National Security Act of 1947.At the time, Stockwell estimated
that over 6 million people
had died in CIA covert actions.
Globalist Wars Killed Over 2 Million
People in Last Decade Propaganda has hidden toll from the American people
by Kurt Nimmo | Infowars.com | March 26, 2015
U.S. wars initiated at the behest of a global
financial elite killed more than 2,000,000 people, according to a report published by Physicians for Social
Responsibility.
This investigation comes to the conclusion that the war has, directly or indirectly, killed around 1 million
people in Iraq, 220,000 in Afghanistan and 80,000 in Pakistan, i.e. a total of around 1.3 million. Not included
in this figure are further war zones such as Yemen. The figure is approximately 10 times greater than that of
which the public, experts and decision makers are aware of and propagated by the media and major NGOs. And this
is only a conservative estimate. The total number of deaths in the three countries named above could also be in
excess of 2 million, whereas a figure below 1 million is extremely unlikely.
The average American, the report notes, is a victim of a
massive propaganda campaign designed to propagate lies about these undeclared an illegal wars.
“A poll carried out by the Associated Press (AP) two years ago found that, on average, US citizens believe that
only 9,900 Iraqis were killed during the occupation,” the reports reads.
Physicians for Social Responsibility places the blame for this on the corporate media. The NGO, however, does
not indicate why the government and the establishment media deliberately downplay the death and destruction
inflicted by the Bush and Obama administrations, although they say the current “state of affairs could be very
different if the public were made aware that the actual number is likely to be more than a hundred times higher”
than the numbers reported by The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, Fox, et al.
“The report is sure to fuel outrage over one of the most controversial wars in US history, one in which ‘the
original pretexts for going to war quickly turned out to be spurious, and from then on only the ‘liberation of the
country from a violent dictatorship’ and the “democratization” and “stabilization” of Iraq remained as
justification for the war and occupation,’” reports Sputnik, a news agency owned by the Russian government.
It may fuel outrage in Europe and Russia, where the media covers studies indicting the U.S. government and its
foreign policy, but is unlikely to do likewise in the United States.
Growing Support in U.S. For Unlimited War
In February the Pew Research Center reported growing support for the ISIS war. “The public has grown
more supportive of the U.S. fight against ISIS, as about twice as many approve (63%) as disapprove (30%) of the
military campaign against the Islamic militant group in Iraq and Syria. Last October, 57% approved and 33%
disapproved,” Pew reported.
Earlier this month a Quinnipiac poll showed American voters strongly in support of sending ground troops to
battle ISIS by more than a 2-to-1 margin.
In February a proposed a new Authorization for the Use of Military Force was left deliberately undefined
“because we believe it’s important that there aren’t overly burdensome constraints that are placed on the commander
in chief,” White House spokesman Josh
Earnest said.
Critics interpret this to mean the executive branch of the government wants to expand the reach of the imperial
presidency and allow it to wage war against ill-defined enemies anywhere in the world.
Additionally, the administration believes the deliberately ambiguous AUMF will bring lawmakers together in a
bipartisan coalition calling for a war against the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq without restraint, including the
use of ground troops.
Only 6 corporations control what most of you see, hear and read every single day.
Darrin McBreen looks at the history of the CIA propaganda machine and the latest release from WikiLeaks that
reveals the Obama Administrations' cozy relationship with Sony Pictures.
Are you being manipulated by the mainstream?
Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. we all
want liberty. Find the free live feed at http://www.infowars.com/watch-alex-jo...
Council on Foreign Relations Tax Returns show
438 MILLION DOLLARS in assets!!
Council on Foreign Relations Secretly Controls the
World
- Bill Maher -
Published on Nov 14, 2014
Bill Maher Joked that Council on Foreign Relations Secretly Controls the World
and anEar to Ear Grin Emerged on CFR President Richard Haas.
Alex Jones Confronts Bush on the CFR and Federal
Reserve
"The globalists create confusion by design so
that people see a smokescreen and can't figure out what's going on and that they hope would just
roll over and give up."
-- Alex Jones, vid: Trump Puppeted By Pro-War Left To
Attack Syria --
Adaptation and
Conformity The Selling Out of Alex Jones/Infowars Link:Psywars
Discovering The Reach of the CFR - John F.
McManus -
During his presidential campaign, Barack
Obama consistently promised Americans “change.” Such promises aren’t new to the voting public.
When Jimmy Carter ran for president, he said: “The people of this country know from bitter
experience that we are not going to get … changes merely by shifting around the same group of insiders.” And top
Carter aide Hamilton Jordan promised: “If, after the inauguration, you find a Cy Vance as Secretary of State and
Zbigniew Brzezinski as head of National Security, then I would say we failed. And I’d quit.” Yet Carter selected
Vance as Secretary of State and Brzezinski as National Security Adviser; the “same group of insiders” had been
shifted around; and Jordan did not quit.
Carter’s administration was dominated by members of the Trilateral Commission, which had been
founded by Brzezinski and David Rockefeller. In 1980, when Ronald Reagan was campaigning against Carter, he
protested:
I don’t believe that the Trilateral Commission is a conspiratorial group,
but I do think its interests are devoted to international banking, multinational corporations, and so forth. I
don’t think that any Administration of the U.S. Government should have the top nineteen positions filled by
people from any one group or organization representing one viewpoint. No, I would go in a different
direction.
Yet after his election, President Reagan picked 10 Trilateralists for his transition team, and
included in his administration such Trilateralists as Vice President George Bush, Defense Secretary Caspar
Weinberger, U.S. Trade Representative William Brock, and Fed Chairman Paul Volcker. Yet the entire North American
membership of the Trilateral Commission has never numbered much over 100.
The reason that presidential candidates’ promises of “change” go largely unfulfilled once in
office: they draw their top personnel from the same establishment groups — of which the Trilateral Commission is
only one.
Chief among these groups is the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the most visible manifestation
of what some have called the American establishment. Members of the council have dominated the administrations of
every president since Franklin D. Roosevelt, at the cabinet and sub-cabinet level. It does not matter whether the
president is a Democrat or Republican. As we will later see, Barack Obama is no exception to CFR influence.
Power Behind the Throne
In theory, America’s government is supposed to be “of the people, by the people, for the people.”
While this concept rang true in early America, and many individuals still trust in it, the last century has seen
the reality of power increasingly shift from the people to an establishment rooted in banking, Wall Street, and
powerful multinational corporations. Syndicated columnist Edith Kermit Roosevelt, granddaughter of Teddy Roosevelt,
explained:
The word “Establishment” is a general term for the power elite in international finance, business,
the professions and government, largely from the northeast, who wield most of the power regardless of who is in the
White House. Most people are unaware of the existence of this “legitimate Mafia.” Yet the power of the
Establishment makes itself felt from the professor who seeks a foundation grant, to the candidate for a cabinet
post or State Department job. It affects the nation’s policies in almost every area.
Roosevelt added that this group’s goal is “a One World Socialist state governed by ‘experts’ like
themselves.”
David Rockefeller, the longtime chairman (and now chairman
emeritus) of the CFR, acknowledged the role of the establishment in trying to lead America in the one-world
direction in his 2002 book Memoirs:
For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have
seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the
inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we
are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me
as “internationalists” and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political
and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of
it.
Two major means the establishment employs for controlling government
policy: (1) through its influence within the two major parties and the mass media, it can usually assure that both
the Republican and Democratic presidential candidates will be its own hand-picked men; (2) by stacking presidential
cabinets with CFR members at key positions — especially those involving defense, finance, foreign policy, and
national security — it can assure that America will move in the direction it wants. Since the council’s founding in
1921, 21 secretaries of defense or war, 19 secretaries of the treasury, 17 secretaries of state, and 15 CIA
directors have hailed from the Council on Foreign Relations.
Background
Prior to the CFR’s founding, what Congressman Charles Lindbergh, Sr. (the father of the famous
aviator) called the “Money Trust” — a cabal of international bankers including the houses of Rockefeller, Morgan,
and Rothschild — conspired to create the Federal Reserve System. Their agents, such as Paul Warburg and Benjamin
Strong, who had secretly planned the Fed at a nine-day meeting on Jekyll Island, were then put in charge of the
system itself. This gave them control of American interest rates, and, by virtue of this, control of the stock
market, as well as the capacity to have the U.S. government spend without limit by having the Fed create money from
nothing. The result has been decades of inflation and skyrocketing national debt. (For full details, see the April
13, 2009 New American or Our Monetary Mayhem Began With the Fed.)
Not just an accumulation of wealth, but a consolidation of political power
was involved. The Money Trust had backed Woodrow Wilson in the presidential elections, and then controlled him
through their front man, Edward Mandell House, who lived in the White House. The trust recognized how the
power of government could be used to advance their own interests.
Wilson, surrounded by the bankers, traveled to the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which was
settling the aftermath of World War I. His chief proposal there, of course, was the League of Nations — a first
step toward world government. However, although the League was established by the Versailles Treaty, the United
States did not join because the Senate refused to ratify the treaty.
In response to this rejection, the bankers’ circle, still in Paris, held a series of meetings and
proposed to establish a new organization in the United States, whose purpose would be to lead America into the
League. This organization was incorporated in New York City two years later as the Council on Foreign
Relations.
Architects of a New World Order
The CFR’s goal was formation of an incrementally stronger world government. Admiral Chester Ward,
former Judge Advocate of the U.S. Navy, was a CFR member for 16 years before resigning in disgust. He stated: “The
main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national
independence, and submergence into an all-powerful one-world government.”
After World War II, the League’s successor, the United Nations, was born. Contrary to what the
public is commonly told, the UN was not founded by nations who had tired of war. The UN was conceived by a group of
CFR members in the State Department calling themselves the Informal Agenda Group. They drafted the original
proposal for the UN, and secured the approval of President Roosevelt, who then made establishing the UN his highest
postwar priority. When the UN held its founding meeting in San Francisco in 1945, 47 of the American delegates were
CFR members.
Though the UN was not initially set up as a world government, the intent
was that it would develop into one over time. John Foster Dulles (CFR), an American delegate to the UN
founding meeting who later became Secretary of State under Eisenhower, acknowledged as much in his book War or
Peace: “The United Nations represents not a final stage in the development of world order, but only a
primitive stage. Therefore its primary task is to create the conditions which will make possible a more highly
developed organization.”
Two other postwar institutions, the World Bank and
International Monetary Fund, were technically created at the 1944 Bretton
Woods Conference. But the initial planning was done by the CFR’s Economic and Finance Group, part of their
wartime War and Peace Studies Project. The World Bank and IMF act as a loan-guarantee scheme for multinational
banks. When a loan to a foreign country goes awry, the World Bank and IMF step in with taxpayer money, ensuring
that the private banks continue to receive interest payments. Furthermore, the World Bank and IMF dictate
conditions to the countries receiving bailouts, thus giving the bankers a measure of political control over
indebted nations.
Despite what Americans were told, the postwar Marshall Plan was not invented by General George
Marshall, though he did announce it in a 1947 Harvard commencement speech. The Marshall Plan was dreamed up at a
CFR study group with David Rockefeller as its secretary. Marshall was simply selected to announce the plan because, as a general, he
would be perceived as politically neutral and help garner bipartisan congressional support for the plan.
Unknown to the public, Marshall Plan funds were circuitously rerouted by John J. McCloy — appointed U.S. High
Commissioner to Germany — to Jean Monnet, founder of the Common Market, which evolved into today’s European
Union, a microcosm of world government. McCloy returned home to become chairman of the Council on Foreign
Relations in 1953.
The tragic Vietnam War was run almost entirely by CFR members. William P. Bundy (CFR) drafted the
Tonkin Gulf Resolution before the now-discredited Tonkin Gulf Incident even took place. Bundy’s father-in-law, Dean
Acheson (CFR), as leader of a senior team of advisers nicknamed “the Wise Men,” persuaded Lyndon Baines Johnson to
dramatically escalate the war beginning in 1965. And Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara (CFR) helped develop the
“rules of engagement” (e.g., preventing the Air Force from attacking critical targets) that guaranteed the war’s
disastrous prolongation. This generated a huge slide to the left among American college students. When Bundy left
the State Department, David Rockefeller appointed him editor of the CFR’s journal Foreign Affairs. And McNamara,
one of the leading architects of the Vietnam War debacle, became president of the World Bank.
Broadening the Scheme
The CFR is not a uniquely American phenomenon. It has counterpart organizations throughout the
world — e.g., the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England, the French Institute of International
Relations, etc.
To help coordinate policy on an international scale, CFR chairman David Rockefeller and Zbigniew
Brzezinski founded the Trilateral Commission in 1973. “Trilateral” refers to the coordination of three global
regions: North America, Europe, and Asia. The commission’s meetings allow the gathering together of heads of state,
banks, multinational corporations, and media. Republican Senator Barry Goldwater called the commission “David
Rockefeller’s newest cabal,” and said, “It is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the
commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States.” The
commission, like the annual secretive meetings of the Bilderbergers and the notorious Bohemian Grove, enables the
international power elite to privately assemble and plan our destiny.
Jimmy Carter was a member of the commission, hand-picked to be president after meeting with
Brzezinski and Rockefeller at the latter’s Tarrytown, New York, estate. Carter filled his administration with CFR
members and Trilateralists. Indeed, Brzezinski noted in his memoirs that “all the key foreign policy decision
makers of the Carter Administration had previously served in the Trilateral Commission.” Carter then embarked on a
destructive course of foreign policy that included betraying the Shah of Iran, leading to the installment of
Ayatollah Khomeini and the U.S. hostage crisis; betraying President Anastasio Somoza of Nicaragua, resulting in a
Marxist dictatorship under the Sandinistas; and betraying Taiwan in order to recognize Communist China — a move
previously set up by Richard Nixon’s overtures to China, dictated by his own CFR advisers.
Under Bill Clinton (a CFR member who selected 12 CFR members for his
cabinet), the United States enacted NAFTA, an economic alliance with
Mexico and Canada. This arrangement was created by the establishment, not by the American people, who
did not suspect the game being played on them. Not only did NAFTA swamp us with cheap, job-destroying imports,
but it was designed to be the foundation for a continental economic union leading to political union. Robert
Pastor (CFR), a key architect of North American integration, acknowledged in the January/February 2004 issue
of Foreign Affairs: “NAFTA was merely the first draft of an economic constitution for North America.” And
Andrew Reding of the World Policy Institute said: “NAFTA will signal the formation, however tentatively, of a
new political unit — North America. With economic integration will come political integration. By whatever
name, this is an incipient form of international government. Following the lead of the Europeans, North
Americans should begin considering formation of a continental parliament.” [Emphasis added.]
A similar stratagem had been used against the peoples of Europe — by first deceptively hooking them
into an “economic” alliance called the Common Market, which then, requiring common laws to regulate trade,
transformed via a series of steps into the European Union, the super-national government of Europe that is
swallowing up national sovereignty.
Following the initial step enacted under Clinton, President George W. Bush, whose father was a CFR
director, moved toward politicizing the NAFTA alliance. On March 23, 2005, he met Mexican President Vicente Fox and
Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin to launch the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), the rudiments of a
North American Union. CNN’s Lou Dobbs said of it: “President Bush signed a formal agreement that will end the
United States as we know it.”
Furthermore, regional alliances such as the European Union and proposed North American Union are
not ends, but only steppingstones to world government. As CFR/Trilateralist Zbigniew Brzezinski stated: “We cannot
leap into world government in one quick step. The precondition for genuine globalization is progressive
regionalization.”
In furtherance of this, on April 30, 2007, President Bush stood at the White House beside Angela
Merkel, president of the European Council, and José Manuel Barroso, president of the European Commission, and
announced the signing of a new agreement to “strengthen transatlantic economic integration.” It called for “joint
work in the areas of regulatory cooperation, financial markets, trade and transport security, innovation and
technological development, intellectual property rights, energy, investment, competition, services, and government
procurement,” and various other steps toward economic integration. But as usual, “economic integration” is the
predecessor of political integration. CFR members have dreamed of a political union between the United States and
Europe since the 1950s, when the CFR-dominated Atlantic Union Committee promoted a merger they called
“Atlantica.”
Enter Obama
Candidate Barack Obama revealed he would proceed with the Bush initiatives. In a speech in Berlin
on July 24, 2008, he stated:
That is why the greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us from one another. The
walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries with the most
and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and
Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down.... Yes, there have been differences between
America and Europe. No doubt, there will be differences in the future. But the burdens of global citizenship
continue to bind us together.... In this new century, Americans and Europeans alike will be required to do more —
not less. Partnership and cooperation among nations is not a choice; it is the one way, the only way, to protect
our common security and advance our common humanity.
Obama had only been president for a little over two months when he traveled to Europe for a series
of meetings with European leaders. He attended the G20 Summit, which ended with a tentative agreement to launch a
new global financial system, using as the rationale for this major step toward global government the recent Fed-
and government-spawned financial meltdown.
Henry Kissinger — foreign policy mouthpiece of the establishment for four decades — wrote an
article for the January 12, 2009 issue of the International Herald Tribune entitled “The Chance for a New World
Order.” He stated:
As the new U.S. administration prepares to take office amid grave financial and international
crises, it may seem counterintuitive to argue that the very unsettled nature of the international system generates
a unique opportunity for creative diplomacy....
Even the most affluent countries will confront shrinking resources. Each will have to redefine its
national priorities. An international order will emerge if a system of compatible priorities comes into
being....
The alternative to a new international order is chaos.
Kissinger also stated on CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street”: “The president-elect is coming into office
at a moment when there is upheaval in many parts of the world simultaneously.... His task will be to develop an
overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great
opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.”
Past statements reveal that the establishment wants a single currency for the world, just as the EU
has consolidated its currencies into the “euro.” As far back as the 1944 Bretton Woods Conference, John Maynard Keynes
proposed a world currency he dubbed bancor. Richard L. Gardner (CFR) wrote in the Fall 1984 Foreign Affairs:
“I suggest a radical alternative scheme for the next century: the creation of common currency for all the
industrial democracies and a joint Bank of Issue to determine that Monetary Policy.”
In March of this year, Obama and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown met with reporters at the
White House. Brown announced that “there is the possibility in the next few months of a global new deal that will
involve all the countries of the world in sorting out and cleaning up the banking system.” Obama added that
Globalization can be an enormous force for good.... But what is also true is … we still have a
1930s regulatory system in place in most countries designed from the last great crisis, that we’ve got to update
our institutions, our regulatory frameworks, so that the power of globalization is channeled for the benefit of
ordinary men and women.
During his campaign, Obama selected the ubiquitous Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR),
promoter of the “regional” approach to world government, as one of his top foreign policy advisors. Obama called
Brzezinski “one of our more outstanding thinkers” and “somebody I have learned an immense amount from.” Presumably
Brzezinski’s teachings included the world government he advocates.
For Treasury Secretary, Obama chose Timothy Geithner: Senior Fellow in International Economics at
the CFR, Bilderberger, former head of the New York Federal Reserve, and former employee of both the IMF and
Kissinger Associates. One doesn’t get more establishment than that! It is Geithner who is managing the bailout of
Wall Street with taxpayer dollars. Assisting Geithner at Treasury in overseeing the auto industry bailout is fellow
CFR member Stephen Rattner.
For Director of the National Economic Council — a U.S. government agency
created by a Bill Clinton executive order — Obama selected Lawrence Summers (CFR, Bilderberger). Former Chief
Economist at the World Bank, his last position was at the investment firm of D. E. Shaw & Co, where he
earned $5.2 million in one year while working one day per week. Henry Kissinger had said Summers should “be
given a White House post in which he was charged with shooting down or fixing bad ideas.”
For Defense Secretary, Obama elected to continue with Bush pick Robert Gates (CFR, Bilderberger).
During the Carter administration, Gates served as a special assistant to Zbigniew Brzezinski. In 2004, he
co-chaired a CFR Task Force on Iran with Brzezinski, who lauded Gates in Time in 2008. Joining Gates in the Defense
Department are fellow CFR members Michele Flournoy (Under Secretary of Defense for Policy), Jeh C. Johnson (Defense
Department General Counsel), and Kathleen Hicks (Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Strategy, Plans and
Forces).
For Secretary of State, Obama chose Hillary Clinton, who has attended the top-secret Bilderberger
meetings. Hillary is not a CFR member, but husband Bill is, and her State Department is laden with CFR members,
including James B. Steinberg (Deputy Secretary of State), William J. Burns (Under Secretary for Political Affairs),
Susan Rice (U.S. Ambassador to the UN), Jacob J. Lew (Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources), Todd
Stern (Special Envoy for Climate Change), and many others.
The Department of Homeland Security, which many Americans fear may turn our country into an
Orwellian surveillance society, was conceived before 9/11 by a task force called the U.S. Commission on National
Security, nine of whose 12 members belonged to the CFR. The administration of the department under Obama is
particularly heavy with CFR members, including Janet Napolitano (Secretary), Jane Holl Lute (Deputy Secretary),
Juliette Kayyem (Assistant Secretary, Office of Intergovernmental Programs), and Alan Bersin (Assistant Secretary,
Office of International Affairs).
Thus the CFR continues to dominate our government’s key areas: finance, defense, foreign policy,
and security. To this may be added various other Obama CFR appointees, such as Mona Sutphen (White House Deputy
Chief of Staff), Paul Volcker (Chairman, Economic Recovery Advisory Board), Peter Cowhey, (Senior Counsel, Office
of U.S. Trade Representative), and Eric Shinseki (Secretary of Veterans Affairs).
The Future
The idea that Barack Obama became president from a “grass-roots” movement is illusory. American
government policy continues to be largely dictated by the rich and the few. This is generally unknown to the public
— not because it is a bizarre conspiracy theory, but because the same power elite who run our government,
mega-banks, and multinational corporations also run the major media, as an inspection of the CFR membership roster
would reveal.
Membership in the CFR, of course, is not an automatic condemnation. A few people are added as
“window dressing” to give the group distinction and a veneer of diversity. An example is movie star Angelina Jolie.
No one suspects Jolie knows much about foreign affairs or is a conspirator for world government. But within the CFR
are hardcore globalists who, linked with their foreign counterparts through the Bilderbergers and Trilateral
Commission, head the drive for one-world government.
Though numerically small (less than 1,000 members during the Kennedy years, less than 4,500 today),
this organization has dominated every administration for over seven decades.
As long as the CFR controls our government, we can anticipate more of the same: diminishing
national sovereignty; free flow of immigration (which confuses national identity and weakens national loyalties);
increasing jobs losses through multinational trade agreements; further internationalization of law (Law of the Sea
Treaty, Kyoto Protocol, World Court, global taxation, etc.); increasing loss of freedoms in a “surveillance
society”; progressive organization of the United States, Mexico, and Canada into a North American Union; and
ultimately, broader merger into a world government where all power will be concentrated in the hands of the
elite.
Eternal vigilance continues to be the price of freedom
"THE GRAND CHESSBOARD"
Meet: Zbigniew Brzezinski Obama's
Foreign Policy Advisor
*James Corbett Interview Follows Documentary*
Brzezinski knew very
well what he was writing about. As National Security Advisor under President Carter, he had
overseenOperation
Cyclone, the US government’s since-declassified
plan to arm, train and fund Islamic radicals in Pakistan and Afghanistan to draw the Soviet Union into a
protracted war in the region. This, famously, led to the foundation of what became known as Al Qaeda in the
1980s, a point that Brzezinski has sinceadmitted and even bragged about, claiming that the creation of a “few stirred up Muslims” helped to bring
down the Soviet Union.
WAR CRIMINAL SUPREME: Zbigniew
Brzezinski
Infinitely easier to kill a million
people then to control a million people
DIVIDE
AND CONQUER
Balkanization:
1. To divide (a country, territory, etc.) into small,
quarrelsome, ineffectual states.
2. To divide (groups, areas, etc.) into
contending and usually ineffectual faction:
a movement to balkanize minority voters.
A divide and conquer strategy, also
known as “divide and rule strategy” is often applied in the arenas of politics
and sociology. In this strategy, one power breaks another power into smaller, more manageable pieces, and then
takes control of those pieces one by one. It generally takes a very strong power to implement such a strategy. In
order to successfully break up another power or government, the conqueror must have access to strong political,
military, and economic machines.
Furthermore, in order to maintain power
and influence, large governments will often work to keep smaller powers and governments from uniting. In fact,
this use of the principles within the divide and conquer strategy is most common. It is much easier to prevent
small powers from linking forces than to break them apart once they have aligned.
Leaders who use a divide and conquer
strategy may encourage or foster feuds between smaller powers. This kind of political maneuvering requires a
great understanding of the people who are being manipulated. In order to foster feuds, for example, one must
understand the political and social histories of the parties intended to take part in the
feuds.
Free Mind Films' follow-up to the multiple
award winning documentary exposé 'A Noble Lie: Oklahoma City 1995' . Free Mind Films has decided to work with
international best-selling author - James Perloff to tell the virtually unknown story of the Council On Foreign
Relations (CFR) and how that organization is the key to understanding how our world has become what we see today.
Mr. Perloff literally wrote the book on the CFRs existence more than 20 years ago and now he's back with a new book
titled "Truth is a Lonely Warrior" which he is used as the research platform to write the script for 'ShadowRing'.
ShadowRing will entertainingly unfold the events that led to the creation of the CFR, the important players who
were instrumental in the council's success within American politics, and how the CFR wields unimaginable influence
over the geo-political agenda of the United States and consequently the events that have shaped our world for the
last 100 years. Expert witnesses and testimony will be weaved together with a historical visual landscape designed
to present the inherent complexity of this subject in a way that is palatable for someone who has no prior
knowledge of the CFR or what power it has over our lives. Source documents will give credibility to these
incredible and life shattering revelations. By providing the audience with the facts and avoiding opinions or
conjecture, ShadowRing will break down the dis-information and unlock the secrets of the CFR providing fertile
ground to encourage a new public debate on the ethical and moral implications of allowing such a small group of
individuals to command such power and influence over our lives.
“If you ask me how the world functions, then
you have to understand one thing plain and simple – the head of the snake, the system of power is headed by the
financial system. The bankers rule the Earth, through the private control of the issuance of money, debt-based
money, which we all are supposed to pay. Ultimately with all of these things that they call “austerity” and
whatnot, the bankers, basically, through the control of issuance of money which allows them to provide themselves
with an infinite supply of money, means that they can buy anything and anyone that can be bought – so if we look at
it, the vast majority of governments around the world, they are nothing more than puppets carrying out an agenda
for the bankers, and the bankers at the top of this pyramid are, as I’ve said, plain and simple psychopaths,
they’re drunk on their own power, they are used to getting everything they want, they can buy anything and anyone
that can be bought. This explains the corruption of virtually every government we can look at, and the policies do
not reflect the interests of the people. They reflect, pure and simple, the interests of the bankers.”
Is "democracy" just a carefully managed con game? Professor Quigley not only spent decades
researching and writing about those who secretly control the machinery of our “representative governments,” he
was permitted to examine their secret papers. He was invited in, but he ultimately betrayed their trust when he
exposed their plans and their methods.
- Joe Plummer -
G. Edward Griffin The Quigley Formula
Bill Clinton And More From The Archives!
Jason Bermas
Premiered Aug 20, 2019
G. Edward Griffin The Quigley Formula Bill Clinton And More From The Archives!
Another great speaker who lays out a compelling narrative of history in the archived series!
The Freedom Index: A Congressional Scorecard Based on the U.S. Constitution rates
congressmen based on their adherence to constitutional principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility,
national sovereignty, and a traditional foreign policy of avoiding foreign entanglements. The percentages below are
cumulative scores are based on key votes from 1999 through 2013. Click on a senator's or representative's name to
get
a detailed breakdown of his or her voting record.
AN AUDIO INTRODUCTION TO THE FREEDOM INDEX SCORECARD