"It's a greatbrainwashing processwhich goes very slow and is
divided intofour basic stages. The first one being
"demoralization". It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation.
Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of
students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of [their] enemy. In other
words,Marxism-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft
heads of at least three generation of American studentswithout
being challenged or counter balancedby
the basic values of Americanism; American patriotism...."
YURI BEZMENOV -- Propagandist for the KGB
KGB
Psycological Warfare Techniques
The Testimony of Yuri Bezmenov,
KGB Propagandist
Interviewed by G. Edward Griffin
Yuri Bezmenov, the son of a high-ranking
Soviet officer, was a member of the elite propaganda arm of the KGB, known as the Novasti Press Agency. One of his
assignments was to accompany journalists visiting the Soviet Union to make sure they did not discover the truth
about Soviet life. After becoming disillusioned with the oppressive system, he escaped to the West at great risk to
his life. In this interview, conducted by G. Edward Griffin, Mr. Bezmenov tells how the Soviets used propaganda
against their own citizens; how he hoodwinked American journalists into publishing Soviet propaganda, how slave
laborers are concealed from foreign visitors, and how he escaped to the West posing as an American hippie. Includes
many photographs brought with him on microfilm at the time of his escape.
Part 1: Life under Soviet Collectivism
Part 2: Propaganda and Mind Control
Part 3: Cultural Subversion and Escape
KGB
Psycological Warfare Techniques
The original 1985 release of this program was entitled Soviet Subversion of the Free-World Press.
It provides insights to state propaganda that is as current as today's newspaper. 90 minutes, DVD
support video makers
ED GRIFFIN: Well, you spoke before about "ideological subversion" and
that's a phrase that I'm afraid some Americans don't understand. When the Soviets use the phrase
"ideological subversion" what do they mean by it?
1. YURI BEZMENOV: Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate and open. You can see it
with your own eyes.... It has nothing to do with espionage.
I know that intelligence gathering looks more romantic.... That's
probably why your Hollywood producers are so crazy about James Bond types of
films.But in reality the main emphasis
of the KGB is NOT in the area of intelligence at all. According to my opinion, and the opinions of many
defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as
such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call
eitherideological subversion, active measures,or psychological
warfare. What it basically means is: to change the perception of
reality of every American that despite of the abundance of informationno one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and
their country.
It's a greatbrainwashing processwhich goes very slow
and is divided intofour basic stages. The first one being "demoralization". It takes from 15 to 20 years
to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years required to
educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of [their] enemy.
In other words,Marxism-Leninism
ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least
three generation of American studentswithout being
challenged or counterbalancedby the basic values of
Americanism; American patriotism....
The result? The result you can see ... the people who graduated in
the 60's, dropouts or half-baked intellectuals, are now occupying thepositions of powerin the government,
civil service, business, mass media, and educational systems. You are stuck with them. You can't get
through to them. They are contaminated.They are programmed
to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern [alluding to Pavlov]. You cannot change their mind even if you expose them to
authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still can not change
the basic perception and the logic of behavior.
In other words [for] these people the process
ofdemoralization iscomplete andirreversible. To rid society of these people
you need another 15 or 20 years to educate a new generation of patriotically minded and common sense
people who would be acting in favor and in the interests of United States society.
ED: And yet these people who have been programmed and as you say
[are] in place and who are favorable to an opening with the Soviet concept - these are the very people
who would be marked for extermination in this country?
YURI: Most of them, yes. Simply because
thepsychological shock when they will
seein [the] future what the beautiful society of EQUALITY and social justice means in
practice, obviously they willrevolt. They will be very unhappy [and]
frustrated people, and Marxist-Leninist regime does not tolerate these people. Obviously they will join
the [ranks] of dissenters; dissidents. Unlike the present United States there will
beno place for dissent in future Marxist-Leninist
America. [Now] you can get popular like Daniel Elsburg and
filthy rich like Jane Fonda for being a dissident [and] for criticizing your Pentagon. In [the] future
these people will simply be [he makes a squishy noise] squashed like cockroaches for criticizing the
government. Nobody is going to pay them nothing for their beautiful [and] noble ideas of EQUALITY. This
they don't understand and it will be the greatest shock for them, of course.
Thedemoralization
process in the United States is basically completed already
for the last 25 years. Actually, it's over fulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where
not even Comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such tremendous success. Most of it is
done by Americans to Americans thanks tolack of moral
standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information
does not matter anymore.A person who was demoralized is
unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to
him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will
refuse to believe it.... That's the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.
The next stage is destabilization.... It only takes 2 to 5
years to destabilize a nation. This time what matters is essentials; economy, foreign relations, [and]
defense systems. And you can see it quite clearly that in some... sensitive areas such as defense and
[the] economy,the influence of Marxist-Leninist ideas in
the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe
it 14 years ago when I landed in this part of the world that the process will go that
fast.
Most of the American politicians, media, and
educational system train another generation of people who think they are living at the peacetime. False. United
States is in a state of war; undeclared,total war against the basic principles and foundations of this
system. And the initiator of this war is not Comrade Andropov of
course - it's the system. However, ridiculous it may sound, [it is] the world Communist system, or
theworld Communist conspiracy. Whether I scare some people or not, I don't give a hoot. If you're not scared by now,
nothing can scare you.
ED: Okay, so what do we do? What is your recommendation to the
American people?
YURI: Well, the immediate thing that comes to mind is, of course,
there must be a very strong national effort to educate people in the spirit of REAL patriotism, number
one. Number two, to explain [to] them the real danger of socialist, communist, welfare state, Big Brother
government.... The moment at least part of [the] United States population is convinced that the danger is
real, they have to FORCE their government... to stop aiding Communism
YURI BEZMENOV aka TOMAS
SCHUMAN -- Soviet Defector from Novosti Press KGB Propaganda
Expert--
"Most of the American politicians, media, and educational system train
another generation of people who think they are living at the peacetime. False. United States is in a
state of war; undeclared,total war against the basic
principles and foundations of this system. And the initiator of this war is not Comrade Andropov of
course - it's the system. However, ridiculous it may sound, [it is] the world Communist system, or
theworld Communist conspiracy. Whether I scare some people or
not, I don't give a hoot. If you're not scared by now, nothing can scare
you."
Soviet Defector from Novosti Press KGB
Propaganda Expert 1
Soviet Defector from Novosti Press KGB
Propaganda Expert 2
Soviet Defector from Novosti Press KGB
Propaganda Expert 3
Soviet Defector from Novosti Press KGB
Propaganda Expert 4
Soviet Defector from Novosti Press KGB
Propaganda Expert 5
Soviet Defector from Novosti Press KGB
Propaganda Expert 6
Soviet Defector from Novosti Press KGB
Propaganda Expert 7
"As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter
anymore.A person who was demoralized is unable to assess
true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I
shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to
believe it.... That's the tragedy of the situation of demoralization."
-- Yuri Bezmenov --
The KGB Agent Who Predicted
EVERYTHING!
With G. Edward Griffin
Press For Truth
Published on Jun 12, 2019
15 to 20 years is how long it takes to change the morals and ideologies of a nation…Marxist
and Lenin ideologies have penetrated North American schools and this was certainly not by accident according to
former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov. We know this because of a ground breaking interview conducted by G. Edward
Griffin, best selling author of “The Creature From Jekyll Isle”. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth
speaks with G. Edward Griffin about this interview, it’s amazing prediction of the future and what the take
away needs to be moving forward if we want to get our North American youth back on track, which is well within
our means!
Is "democracy" just a carefully managed con game? Professor Quigley not only spent decades
researching and writing about those who secretly control the machinery of our “representative governments,”
he was permitted to examine their secret papers. He was invited in, but he ultimately betrayed their trust
when he exposed their plans and their methods.
- Joe Plummer -
"...The other 85% is a slow process which
we call either ideological subversion, active measures,or psychological warfare. What it basically means is:
to change the perception of reality of every American that despite of the abundance of
informationno one is able to come to sensible
conclusionsin the interest of defending themselves,
their families, their community, and their country."
--Yuri Bezmenov
--
PSYOPS
-- Psychological Operations --
“People in general just will NOT,
take their heads out of the sand!”
Psyops, or psychological operations, is a term used to describe the
techniques of psychological manipulation used in warfare. These operations are used to deceive, confuse, disrupt
and demoralize the enemy, with an aim toward weakening enemy resistance or even causing enemy forces to surrender
and enemy populations to capitulate.
Alex Jones & Mike Adams Are Pushing a Faux "Revolution"
The Conscious Resistance
Published on Sep 24, 2018
Derrick Broze examines recent videos from Alex Jones and Mike Adams claiming that Trump will
declare martial law. These men and infowars are not to be trusted. They are going to help create the perfect
conditions for a civil war that the ruling class will use to enact complete control.
The Conscious Resistance Network is an independent media organization focused on empowering individuals through
education, philosophy, health, and community organizing. We work to create a world where corporate and state power
does not rule over the lives of free human beings.
Our work is supported by SmartCash, the business focused, user-friendly & decentralized
crypto-currency. www.smartcash.cc
Support our work: Patreon.com/DerrickBroze
Alex Jones Does 180 on Police State
Advocates Military Be Used to Arrest US Citizens to Resolve Contrived Left-Right Tensions
"...They're going to guillotine everybody and have a communist utopia and they're all nodding 'we're going to kill
the conservatives and the christians, we're going to kill them'. And these are marches with hundreds of thousands
of people nodding their head, 'We are going to kill you.' As far as I'm concerned, the safest thing to do would
just to be, have Trump, just go ahead and have the Army go ahead and
arrest these people. We are in a red alert right now; we need to have
the Army just arrest these people. And I guarantee you George Washington, if stuff like
this was going on, would go arrest the people that were doing it."
-- Alex Jones, vid: Is The Civil War Here NOW?, WeAreChange
Jul 2, 2018 --
"...And this comes from a man who made four, not one, not
two, not three, four movies called The Police State and
even another one called Martial Law 911 warning the
general public about the use of the US Army domestically inside The United States. This is a man who is most well
known for warning the American public about the rise of the police state, who has now completely turned 180 degrees
and is ultimately calling for martial law in the streets to arrest people who are protesting the
government!"
-- Luke Rudkowski, vid: Is The Civil War Here NOW?,
WeAreChange Jul 2, 2018 --
** For more information go to the False Left-Right Paradigm page and look at the section: Alex Jones
Paradigm Pivot **
...ALL OTHER INFOWARSCONTENT BELOW IS BEFORE 2016 WHEN THEY SOLD OUT!
Infowars Employees Expose Alex Jones
Know More News
Published on Oct 4, 2017
Former Alex Jones employees and guests speak out about the big problems going on at Infowars
"The globalists create confusion by design so
that people see a smoke screen and can't figure out what's going on and that they hope would just
roll over and give up."
-- Alex Jones, vid: Trump Puppeted By Pro-War Left To
Attack Syria --
Adaptation and
Conformity The Selling Out of Alex Jones/Infowars Link:Psywars
"There’s a good chance you have never heard of them. In less than 30 years,
this American financial firm has grown from nothing to becoming the world’s largest and most
trusted manager of other people’s money. The assets left in their care are worth a staggering
6.3 trillion US dollars – a figure with 12 zeroes." (Investigate Europe - May 10, 2018)
"BlackRock, the international investment management firm run by billionaire
Larry Fink, has played an outsized role in Federal Reserve bailouts of Wall Street. As it turns
out, it’s also been quietly managing hundreds of billions of dollars for more than five million
federal government employees in their retirement plan, known as the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)."
(By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: June 4, 2020 ~ ARTICLE: BlackRock Is Bailing Out Its ETFs
with Fed Money and Taxpayers Eating Losses; It’s Also the Sole Manager for $335 Billion of
Federal Employees’ Retirement Funds.)
Background on Technocracy:
Technocracy is a replacement economic system for Capitalism and Free
Enterprise, and is represented by the United Nations’ program for Sustainable Development and
“Green Economy.” It proposes that all means of production and consumption would be controlled
by an elite group of scientists and engineers (technocrats) for the good of mankind.
Technocracy was originally architected in the 1930s but regained favor when adopted by the
Trilateral Commission in 1973, under their “New International Economic Order”
program.(definition found on Techocracy News https://technocracy.news/)
Links:
1.
New Study Suggests COVID Was Spreading Earlier/Far
Less Deadly & Trump's BlackRock Take Over
Senate Forbids Israel Boycott - Is It
Constitutional?
RonPaulLibertyReport
Published February 7, 2019
The first Senate bill of the year has taken on those who seek to boycott Israel over its
treatment of Palestinians. In a complicated maneuver, the Senate has voted to allow states to boycott the
boycotters. Is it a free speech/First Amendment issue? Supporters of the bill say no. Many civil libertarians
disagree.
Congressman Jim Traficant vs Donald
Trump On Israel
Blackstone Intelligence Network
Published on Apr 27, 2019
#Israel has long been a threat to American security. In this video, former Congressman Jim
Traficant talks about Israel and the #Zionist lobby in the USA. If YOU want to support the #BDS movement against
Israel, please follow the steps I've outlined to combat the anti-free speech bill HR 336: https://www.blackstoneintel.com/hr336
“Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East The Infamous "Oded Yinon Plan". Introduction by Michel Chossudovsky
Know More News Premiered May 22, 2019 Know More News with Adam Green
https://www.KnowMoreNews.org/ Support Know More News! Paypal Donations - https://www.paypal.me/KnowMoreNews Patreon
- https://www.patreon.com/AdamGreen Venmo - @Know-More-News
Are these protests in Iran spontaneous, or are they the result of another regime change operation?
This week on The Corbett Report James explores the past, present and future of US and Israeli
involvement in Iran, and the attempts to foment unrest in the country.
Trump Recruits Zionist Neocon John Bolton for War with Iran
Blackstone Intelligence Network
Published on Mar 22, 2018
In 2016, I predicted that Trump would bring John Bolton into his administration to
prep for war with Iran. I was right. Trump's administration is completely under the control of the
globalists and you have to be blind to not see it.
USA, Israel & Saudi Arabia Prepping for Zionist War With
Iran
End Times News Report
Published on Dec 9, 2017
War with Iran is inevitable. The Zionist puppet masters have been trying for years to start a war
with Iran and that reality has never been closer than it is today. The USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia
are all making coordinated moves in preparation for a major war.
“This channel [Truthstream Media] has covered multiple times that Iran is so
much in the crosshairs, it’s such a persistent target. It’s such a country that these war generals
and policy wonks in Washington are salivating over, that an actual entire book was written by
theBrookings Institute - yeah satan’s own think tank - raising the question, ’which path to
Persia?’ Not whether there would be a conflict in Iran, not whether they seek regime change, but
how to get there and maintain international credibility. And they ran through everything from a
false flag attack, to a joint air strike with Israel or Saudi
Arabia, to a domino situation with Syria or surrounding countries, to a PT boat confrontation and
much more.”
-- Aaron Dykes, journalist, Truthstream Media, video
: While Everyone Was Busy Being Distracted by Texas… --
"...the U.S. government has worked to bring key agencies, such as
the U.N. Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR), the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and
the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), under U.S. control and domination." -- Robert Parry, U.N. Enablers of ‘Aggressive
War’ --
Speculations Rise Over Israeli Assassination Of IAEA Director
Amano
U.N. investigative reports,
like a new one condemning Syria for alleged sarin use, are received as impartial and credible, but are often just
more war propaganda from compromised bureaucrats, reports Robert Parry.
Many people still want to believe that the United Nations engages in impartial
investigations and thus is more trustworthy than, say, self-interested governments, whether Russia or the
United States. But trust in U.N. agencies is no longer well placed; whatever independence they may have once
had has been broken, a reality relevant to recent “investigations” of Syrian chemical weapons use.
There is also the larger issue of the United Nations’ peculiar silence about one of its primary and original
responsibilities, shouldered after the horrors of World War II – to stop wars of aggression, which today include
“regime change” wars organized, funded and armed by the United States and other Western powers, such as the Iraq
invasion in 2003, the overthrow of the Libyan government in 2011, and a series of proxy wars including the ongoing
Syrian conflict.
After World War II, the Nuremberg Tribunals declared that a “war of aggression … is not only an international
crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself
the accumulated evil of the whole.”
That recognition became a guiding principle of the United Nations Charter, which specifically prohibits
aggression or even threats of aggression against sovereign states.
The Charter declares in Article One that it is a chief U.N. purpose “to take effective collective measures … for
the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace.” Article Two, which defines the appropriate
behavior of U.N. members, adds that
“All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the
territorial integrity or political independence of any state…”
However, instead of enforcing this fundamental rule, the United Nations has, in effect, caved in to the
political and financial pressure brought to bear by the United States and its allies. A similar disregard for
international law also pervades the U.S. mainstream media and much of the European and Israeli press as well.
There is an assumption that the United States and its allies have the right to intervene militarily anywhere in
the world at anytime solely at their own discretion. Though U.S. diplomats and mainstream journalists still voice
outrage when adversaries deviate from international law – such as denunciations of Russia over Ukraine’s civil war
– there is silence or support when a U.S. president or, say, an Israeli prime minister orders military strikes
inside another country. Then, we hear only justifications for these attacks.
Shielding Israel
For instance, on Friday, The New York Times published
an article about Israel conducting a bombing raid inside Syria that reportedly killed two Syrians. The
article is notable because it contains not a single reference to international law and Israel’s clear-cut violation
of it. Instead, the article amounts to a lengthy rationalization for Israel’s aggression, framing the attacks as
Israeli self-defense or, as the Times put it,
“an escalation of Israel’s efforts to prevent its enemies from gaining access to sophisticated weapons.”
The article also contains no reference to the fact that Israel maintains a sophisticated nuclear arsenal and is
known to possess chemical and biological weapons as well. Implicit in the Times article is that the U.S. and Israel
live under one set of rules while countries on the U.S.-Israeli enemies list must abide by another. Not to state
the obvious but this is a clear violation of the journalistic principle of objectivity.
But the Times is far from alone in applying endless double standards. Hypocrisy now
permeates international agencies, including the United Nations, which instead of pressing for accountability
in cases of U.S. or Israeli aggression has become an aider and abettor, issuing one-sided reports that justify
further aggression while doing little or nothing to stop U.S.-backed acts of aggression.
For instance, there was no serious demand that U.S. and British leaders who organized the 2003 invasion of Iraq,
which resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, should face any accountability for committing the
“supreme international crime” of an aggressive war. As far as the U.N. is concerned, war-crimes tribunals are for
the little guys.
This breakdown in the integrity of the U.N. and related agencies has developed over the past few decades as one
U.S. administration after another has exploited U.S. clout as the world’s “unipolar power” to ensure that
international bureaucrats conform to U.S. interests. Any U.N. official who deviates from this unwritten rule can
expect to have his or her reputation besmirched and career truncated.
So, while harshly critical of alleged abuses by the Syrian military, U.N. officials are notoriously silent when
it comes to condemning the U.S., Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Turkey, Israel and other countries that have been “covertly”
backing anti-government “rebels” who have engaged in grave crimes against humanity in Syria.
The U.S. and its allies have even mounted overt military operations inside Syrian territory, including
airstrikes against the Syrian military and its allies, without permission of the internationally recognized
government in Damascus. Yet, the U.N. does nothing to curtail or condemn these clear violations of its own
Charter.
Breaking the Independence
The reason is that, for much of this century, the U.S. government has worked to bring key agencies, such as the
U.N. Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR), the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and the Organization for
the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), under U.S. control and domination.
This drive to neutralize the U.N.’s independence gained powerful momentum after the 9/11 attacks
and President George W. Bush’s launching of his “global war on terror.” But this effort
continued under President Obama and now under President Trump.
In 2002, after opening the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and effectively waiving the Geneva Convention’s
protections for prisoners of war, Bush bristled at criticism from the United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights Mary C. Robinson.
Soon, Robinson was targeted for removal.
Her fierce independence, which also included criticism of Israel, was unacceptable. The Bush administration lobbied
hard against her reappointment, leading to her retirement in 2002.
Also, in 2002, the Bush administration engineered the firing of
OPCW’s Director General Jose Mauricio Bustani who was viewed as an obstacle to the
U.S. plans for invading Iraq.
Bustani, who had been reelected unanimously to the post less than a year earlier, described his removal in
a
2013 interview with Marlise Simons of The New York Times, citing how Bush’s
emissary, Under-Secretary of State John Bolton, marched into Bustani’s office and announced
that he (Bustani) would be fired.
“The story behind [Bustani’s] ouster has been the subject of interpretation and speculation for years, and
Mr. Bustani, a Brazilian diplomat, has kept a low profile since then,” wrote Simons. “But with the agency
[OPCW] thrust into the spotlight with news of the Nobel [Peace] Prize [in October 2013], Mr. Bustani agreed to
discuss what he said was the real reason: the Bush administration’s fear that chemical weapons inspections in
Iraq would conflict with Washington’s rationale for invading it. Several officials involved in the events, some
speaking publicly about them for the first time, confirmed his account.”
The official U.S. explanation for getting rid of Bustani was incompetence, but Bustani and the other diplomats
close to the case reported that Bustani’s real offense was drawing Iraq into acceptance of the OPCW’s conventions
for eliminating chemical weapons, just as the Bush administration was planning to pin its propaganda campaign for
invading Iraq on the country’s alleged secret stockpile of WMD.
Bustani’s ouster gave President Bush a clearer path to the invasion by letting him frighten Americans with the
prospect of Iraq sharing its chemical weapons and possibly a nuclear bomb with Al Qaeda terrorists.
Dismissing Iraq’s insistence that it had destroyed its chemical weapons and didn’t have a nuclear weapons
project, Bush launched the invasion in March 2003, only for the world to discover later that the Iraqi government
was telling the truth.
Compliant Replacements
In comparison to the independent-minded Bustani, the biography of the current OPCW
director general, Ahmet Uzumcu, a career Turkish diplomat, suggests that the OPCW could be
expected to slant its case against the Syrian government in the current Syrian conflict.
Not only has Turkey, a NATO ally of the United States, been a key player in supporting the proxy war to
overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, but Uzumcu also served as Turkey’s ambassador to
Israel, which has long sought regime change in Syria and has publicly come out in favor of the anti-government
rebels.
Another one-time thorn in the side of the U.S. “unipolar power” was the IAEA when it was under the control of
Director General Mohamed ElBaradei, an Egyptian. The IAEA challenged the Bush administration’s
claims about Iraq having a nuclear program, when one really didn’t exist.
However, being right is no protection when U.S. officials want to bring an agency into line with U.S. policy and
propaganda. So, early in the Obama administration – as Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton was pushing for a hardline on Iran over its nascent nuclear program – the U.S. government
engineered the insertion of a pliable Japanese diplomat, Yukiya Amano, into the IAEA’s top
job.
Before his appointment, Amano had portrayed himself as an independent-minded fellow who was resisting
U.S.-Israeli propaganda about the Iranian nuclear program. Yet behind the scenes, he was meeting with U.S. and
Israeli officials to coordinate on how to serve their interests (even though Israel is an actual rogue nuclear
state, not a hypothetical or fictional one).
Amano’s professed doubts about an Iranian nuclear-bomb project, which even the
U.S. intelligence community agreed no longer existed, was just a theatrical device to intensify the later
impact if he were to declare that Iran indeed was building a secret nuke, thus justifying the desire of
Israeli leaders and American neoconservatives to “bomb-bomb-bomb” Iran.
But this U.S. ploy was spoiled by Pvt. Bradley (now Chelsea) Manning’s leaking of hundreds of
thousands of pages of U.S. diplomatic cables. Among them were reports on Amano’s hidden collaboration with U.S. and
Israeli officials; his agreement with U.S. emissaries on who to fire and who to retain among IAEA officials; and
even Amano’s request for additional U.S. financial contributions.
The U.S. embassy cables revealing the truth about Amano were published by
the U.K. Guardian in 2011 (although ignored by The New York Times, The Washington Post and other mainstream U.S.
news outlets). Despite the silence of the major U.S. news media, Internet outlets, such as Consortiumnews.com,
highlighted the Amano cables, meaning that enough Americans knew the facts not to be fooled again. [For details,
see Consortiumnews.com’s “Did
Manning Help Avert War with Iran?”]
A Collective Collapse
So, over the years, there has been a collective collapse of the independence at U.N.-related agencies. An
international bureaucrat who gets on the wrong side of the United States or Israel can expect to be fired and
humiliated, while those who play ball can be assured of a comfortable life as a “respected” diplomat.
But this reality is little known to most Americans so they are still inclined to be influenced when a “U.N.
investigation” reaches some conclusion condemning some country that already is on the receiving end of negative
U.S. propaganda.
The New York Times, CNN and other major U.S. news outlets are sure to trumpet these “findings” with great
seriousness and respect and to treat any remaining doubters as outside the mainstream. Of course, there’s an
entirely different response on the rare occasion when some brave or foolhardy human rights bureaucrat criticizes
Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. Then, the U.N. finding is just a sign of anti-Israeli bias and should be
discounted.
In the far more frequent cases when a U.N. report is in line with U.S. propaganda, American journalists almost
never turn a critical eye toward the quality of the evidence or the leaps of logic. We saw that happen this week
with a thinly sourced and highly dubious U.N. report blaming the Syrian government for an alleged sarin incident on
April 4. A major contradiction
in the evidence – testimony given to OPCW investigators undercutting the conclusion that a Syrian warplane
could have dropped a sarin bomb – was brushed aside by the U.N. human rights investigators and was ignored by the
Times and other major U.S. news outlets.
But what is perhaps most troubling is that these biased U.N. reports are now used to justify continued wars of
aggression by stronger countries against weaker ones. So, instead of acting as a bulwark to protect the powerless
from the powerful as the U.N. Charter intended, the U.N. bureaucracy has turned the original noble purpose of the
institution on its head by becoming an enabler of the “supreme international crime,” wars of aggression.
Investigative reporter Robert Parry broke many of the
Iran-Contra stories for The Associated Press and Newsweek in the 1980s. You can buy his latest book, America’s
Stolen Narrative, either in print here or as an e-book
(from
Amazon and
barnesandnoble.com).
What Is Zionism? And Why I'm a Proud
Anti-Zionist
- Video Compilation -
Blackstone Intelligence Network Published on Apr 19, 2018
This compilation provides a basic,
non-controversial overview of the topic of Zionism from a
historical perspective that draws from extensive original and academic sources.
The Dire Threat of Israeli Zionist Control Over America
Blackstone Intelligence Network
Published on Apr 18, 2018
Today marks the 70th anniversary of the state of Israel. No nation has posed as much danger to
the survival of the United States as Israel. I love history. Lessons learned by past generations can help us to
navigate through today's tangled maze - if we are willing to pay attention to history's lessons. History repeats
itself, so we benefit from
studying previous events to avoid making the same mistakes again.
N A T I O N A L D E B T ! ! ! ! !
!
How Zionist Israel is Robbing America
Blind!
First published at 01:15 UTC on September 6th, 2019.
It doesn't matter if you are a hard-working American. YOU are not
entitled to keep your own income. YOU are a cash cow for the Zionist state of Israel. America's labor force is
Israel's Golden Goose. And I am going
to show you the financial statistics to prove it.
Ry Dawson First published at 09:39 UTC on August 18th, 2019.
Trying to hide the Jewishness of criminals causes more not less antisemitism. this report was
motivated by YouTube erasing my videos on Israeli crimes. Well you want the gloves off? OK then. You get what you
ask for.
join me EVERYDAY for another case of yids raping kids.
When the first edition of The Media Monopoly was published in 1983, critics called Ben
Bagdikian's warnings about the chilling effects of corporate ownership and mass advertising on the nation's news
"alarmist." Since then, the number of corporations controlling most of America's daily newspapers, magazines, radio
and television stations, book publishers, and movie companies has dwindled from fifty to ten
to five.
"Let's look at the track records, what kind of news source in the U.S. let's say in the past
fifteen years, twenty years, has the highest level of disseminating fake news? I'm talking about factual grounds,
I'm not talking about sensationalism or embellishment okay. What were the sources for the WMD (Weapons of Mass
Destruction) stories that were sold to the public, marketed on hourly basis, not even hourly on minutely basis to
the public?...Mainstream Media: NBC, NPR, CNN, all these sources. And now that we all know it has been established
that for example that WMD stories were all fake, they were lies, they were false...can you recall any of these
publications Mainstream Media publications: NBC, CNN, NPR, PBS, ever coming and issuing an official formal
retraction? Have you heard any of these channels coming and actually apologizing, and saying we disseminated fake
news. And we basically got us into the war by manufacturing consent from the public and that caused tens of
billions of dollars if not trillions of dollars in terms of dollar costs, and all these lives, you know...People in
Iraq and also American Soldiers died. So you're looking at criminal lie in this case, but what kind of consequences
those Mainstream Media channels have faced?"
A Clinton campaign email released as part of the Wikileaks data dump earlier today
talks about the need to maintain political power by producing “an unaware and compliant
citizenry”.
In addition to images of President Obama’s address
to the American public on Sunday night, it has emerged that the dramatic photos of Obama, Biden, Hillary
Clinton and members of the White House security team watching the assassination of Bin Laden “live” were in
fact completely staged, casting further doubt on
the ever-changing official account of the operation.
The staging of the Obama speech photo is
embarrassing, but the staging of the situation room photos, which were heavily promoted by the establishment
media, falsely presented as evidence that Obama, Biden and Clinton saw the assassination of Osama live, and
used by the White House to lend credence to
the fairytale they were busily scripting, are damning.
DHS Gave Muslim Brotherhood
VIP Treatment, NO TSA PAT DOWNS
A newly released document obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request confirms that
the State Department ordered the Department of Homeland Security to spare members of the Muslim Brotherhood
traveling
to the US in 2012 a TSA pat down or any kind of secondary screening.
The one page document (PDF), obtained by the Investigative Project on Terrorism, shows
that members of a Muslim Brotherhood delegation traveling through Minneapolis Airport, New York’s John F. Kennedy
Airport and Dulles Airport were handed expedited entry known as “port courtesy,” which is normally reserved for
high ranking government officials and dignitaries. At the time, the Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate Mohamed
Morsi,
later deposed, had not been elected president.
Bin Laden was a strawman-villain concocted by the Western
intelligence apparatus to take the blame for the orchestrated terror that is scripted and carried out by the
globalist-allied factions. The Phantom Osama bin Laden was a skeleton key opening the door to foreign intervention
in the middle east or anywhere al Qaeda might be. The motive is simple-- ever-expanding wars for the military
industrial complex, and the often more lucrative periods of reconstruction (i.e. you break it, you buy it). The
occupation continues here at home with the creation of a police state supposedly meant to combat
terrorism.
How could there be aWar on Terror and actually say that we're having
awar against terrorism, and leave the
borders wide open? If you were the President of the United States, or I were the President of the United States,
and9/11 really happened the way they
want us to believe it happened, the first thing you would do is shut down the borders, so people couldn't get in
the country to harm you. But they left the borders wide open. Becausethe bankers want the borders open, because they want
aone-world government. They
want a North American Union. They don't want borders
here.9/11 was only a manifestation.
It was done to create afear in the
American public, so that we willobey what they want us to do.
Robert Gibbs Lied to America about The Drone
Program!
_Drone Denial by Lame Stream
Media_
Robert Gibbs Lied to America about The Drone
Prgm.
The lies are getting too ridiculous.
Former
Obama Press Secretary Was Ordered To Act As If Drone Program Did Not Exist
The first rule of the drone program
is
that you do not talk about the drone program
Steve Watson
Infowars.com
Feb 25, 2013
In a rare admission, Robert Gibbs, the former White House
Press Secretary under Obama, told reporters Sunday that he was ordered to act as if there was no such thing as an
active US drone program.
“When I went through the process of becoming press secretary, one of the first things they told me was, you’re
not even to acknowledge the drone program,” Gibbs said on MSNBC’s “Up With Chris Hayes” this past weekend.
Gibbs said that he was told “You’re not even to discuss that it exists.”
Noting that the notion was “inherently crazy”, Gibbs said “You’re being asked a question based on reporting of a
program that exists.”
“So you’re the official government spokesperson acting as if the entire program—pay no attention to the man
behind the curtain.” Gibbs, who was Press Secretary between 2009 and 2011, said.
Gibbs stated that he expects the drone program to remain secret for the most part, despite moves in Congress to
force more transparency.
“I have not talked to him about this, so I want to be careful,” Gibbs said, “but I think what the president has
seen is, our denial of the existence of the program when it’s obviously happening undermines people’s confidence
overall in the decisions that their government makes.”
While the program itself remains classified, it is no secret that Obama has vastly expanded the US drone war
since entering office in 2009. Daily drone strikes are raining down on Yemen, Pakistan and Afghanistan, as well as
Somalia.
A recent report released by Washington based think tank, The New America Foundation
revealed that the number of secret US drone strikes in Yemen almost tripled in 2012, compared to 2011.
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, has found that at least 171 civilians, including 35 children, have been
slaughtered in Yemen by secret US drone strikes over the past ten years.
Communications released by WikiLeaks in 2010 revealed that the US and Yemen have repeatedly attempted to cover
up the use of US warplanes to bombard Yemen.
Last week it was announced that despite the fact that drone strikes have killed thousands of innocent civilians
in Yemen and Pakistan, the Pentagon is to reward drone operators with medals.
The DoD is creating a new ribbon, called the Distinguished Warfare Medal that will be awarded for “extra
achievement” related to a military operation. This will encompass sitting at a computer console and pressing a
button to release Hellfire missiles from Predator drones hundreds and thousands of miles away.
The medal will become the fourth-highest ranking combat decoration, placing above the Bronze Star.
Despite the official secrecy, the president has referred to the drone program several times in public, as have
officials such as counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan.
Last year, the New York Times ran a major piece on the program revealing that the White House
has asserted the right to carry out state-sponsored assassination anywhere in the world without having to
provide any evidence or go through any legal process.
The administration merely has to state that the target is
a terrorist and it doesn’t matter whether they are an American citizen or not, as we saw in the case of American-born Anwar al-Awlaki and his son, who were both killed last year.
In December of last year, Obama administration lawyers reaffirmed their backing for state sponsored
assassination, claiming that “U.S. citizens are legitimate military targets” and do not have the right to any
legal protection against being marked for summary execution.
During a CBS 60 Minutes interview in January, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta
revealed that Obama himself personally approves the policy to kill American citizens suspected of terrorism
without trial on a case by case basis.
Perhaps the real reason that the administration wants the details of the programme kept under wraps is that, as
reported by Propublica recently, the programme is potentially much bigger in scope than
anyone had previously thought.
The administration’s figures do not add up, they are chock full of contradictions and discrepancies, and there
can be little doubt that there have been many many more civilian deaths as a result of drone attacks than have been
publicly acknowledged.
Akram, who noted that US drone strikes had killed more than 1,000 civilians in Pakistan, also said “We find the
use of drones to be totally counterproductive in terms of succeeding in the ‘war against terror’. It leads to
greater levels of terror rather than reducing them.
Many also contend that the attacks infringe the national sovereignty of Pakistan and constitute an act of
war.
In 2010,
a report by Washington think tank The New America Foundation found that 32% of the more than
1,200 people killed since 2004 in Pakistan, or around 1 in 3, were innocent bystanders rather than dangerous
terrorists.
—————————————————————-
Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of
Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from
Nottingham Trent University.
This article was posted: Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:00 am
In the 70's, David Rockefeller extended his praise to communist dictator of China, Mao
Zedong, in an article published in the New York Times, for his country's one-child policy, which will be the model for the
Western nations to follow in the future -- hence China's "Most Favored Nation" status granted
by the UN.
Agenda: Grinding Down America DVD by Curtis Bowers is the award
winning documentary that reveals the true direction our society is moving. Get informed about the
intentional changes that are happening and discover
what you can do to stand up against these forces.
[From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon
Skousen]
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to
atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in
atomic war.
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United
States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist
affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet
satellites.
6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist
domination.
7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the
U.N.
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of
Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the
U.N.
9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United
States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the
U.N.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter
is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some
Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two
centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist
Party.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent
Office.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United
States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic
American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17.
Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda.
Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in
textbooks.
18.
Gain control of all student newspapers.
19.
Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist
attack.
20.
Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making
positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion
pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms
of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and
buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan
is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."
24.
Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free
press.
25.
Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion
pictures, radio, and TV.
26.
Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural,
healthy."
27.
Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize
the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."
28.
Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the
principle of "separation of church and state."
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate,
old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide
basis.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as
selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."
31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the
teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more
emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control
over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics,
etc.
33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the
operation of the Communist apparatus.
34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American
Activities.
35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the
FBI.
36. Infiltrate and gain control of more
unions.
37. Infiltrate and gain control of big
business.
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to
social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can
understand [or treat].
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health
laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40.
Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy
divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative
influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of
parents.
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are
legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use
["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.
43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations
are ready for self-government.
44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot
prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction]
over nations and individuals alike.
This article was posted: Monday, March 24, 2014 at 9:27 am
-- Harriet Tubman --
"I freed a thousand slaves; I
could have freed a thousand more,
if only they knew they were slaves."
Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who
are constantly and intelligently
on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic procedures.
"A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time,
not on the spot, not here and now and in their calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other
worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the
encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it.”
What if it does happen here?
Why take chances? What are the SOLUTIONS? There are different solutions for different stages of subversion. If a
nation has enough common sense to STOP subversion at the very beginning of the DEMORALIZATION stage, you may never
need the painful and drastic solutions needed to deal with the CRISIS stage.
The most general solution I can offer-- for the whole process of
SUBVERSION-- is to STOP AIDING THE SUBVERTER. You are still living in a free society and you are able to force
your elected politicians to change their policies toward the Communist world if you so choose. But if YOU,
personally do not see anything wrong in dealing with the Communists and HELPING them in their global expansion,
I feel that you should begin learning more about the reality of the Communist/ Socialist situation, not from
your monopolized media, but from the independent media and press who have no vested interest in making out the
Soviet Union to be the 'good guys,’ and from people like myself, who have experienced Communism first-hand for
many years. There are numerous American patriotic groups and organizations who are well informed and who already
have many SOLUTIONS, to combat the damage done by ideological subversion, some of which are as good or even
better than mine. Seek these groups, join them and DO something.
This booklet is my love letter to America. I did not write it to
frighten or threaten the nation that I love for its freedom, its principles, its ideals. But if you were walking
across the street with a friend and saw a car barreling down upon you both that your friend did not see, would
you say nothing to your friend and move out of the way, leaving him to be hit? Of course not and I do not intend
to do that to you.
In my next booklet, I will cover the full solutions to the problem of
ideological subversion. I sincerely hope you will be reading it.
Is "democracy" just a carefully managed con game? Professor Quigley not only spent decades
researching and writing about those who secretly control the machinery of our “representative governments,” he
was permitted to examine their secret papers. He was invited in, but he ultimately betrayed their trust when he
exposed their plans and their methods.
- Joe Plummer -
G. Edward Griffin The Quigley Formula
Bill Clinton And More From The Archives!
Jason Bermas
Premiered Aug 20, 2019
G. Edward Griffin The Quigley Formula Bill Clinton And More From The Archives!
Another great speaker who lays out a compelling narrative of history in the archived series!
[Help Educate Family And Friends With This Page And The Links Below]
ED: Okay, so what do we do? What is your recommendation to the American
people?
YURI: Well, the immediate thing that comes to mind is, of course, there
must be a very strong national effort to educate people in the spirit of REAL patriotism, number one. Number
two, to explain [to] them the real danger of socialist, communist, welfare state, Big Brother government....
The moment at least part of [the] United States population is convinced that the danger is real, they have to
FORCE their government... to stop aiding Communism
Many people still want to believe that the United Nations engages in impartial
investigations and thus is more trustworthy than, say, self-interested governments, whether Russia or the
United States. But trust in U.N. agencies is no longer well placed; whatever independence they may have once
had has been broken, a reality relevant to recent “investigations” of Syrian chemical weapons use.
But the Times is far from alone in applying endless double standards. Hypocrisy now
permeates international agencies, including the United Nations, which instead of pressing for accountability
in cases of U.S. or Israeli aggression has become an aider and abettor, issuing one-sided reports that justify
further aggression while doing little or nothing to stop U.S.-backed acts of aggression.
Also, in 2002, the Bush administration engineered the firing of
OPCW’s Director General Jose Mauricio Bustani who was viewed as an obstacle to the
U.S. plans for invading Iraq.
Amano’s professed doubts about an Iranian nuclear-bomb project, which even the
U.S. intelligence community agreed no longer existed, was just a theatrical device to intensify the later
impact if he were to declare that Iran indeed was building a secret nuke, thus justifying the desire of
Israeli leaders and American neoconservatives to “bomb-bomb-bomb” Iran.
