Look Into It - Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns
welcome
Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do
Not Turn In Guns
“Warning shots will not be fired”
A newly leaked US Army Military Police training manual for “Civil Disturbance
Operations” outlines how military assets are to be used domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and even
kill Americans
on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.
Troops
Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns
Only UN peacekeepers will
be allowed to carry firearms.
Okay, we all know how awful Hillary Clinton is. We all know that Donald Trump said all the right
things (well, many of the right things) on the campaign trail. We all know—at least believed—that Trump was not an
establishment insider. We all know that Trump promised to “drain the swamp,” dramatically reduce America’s
out-of-control deficit spending, protect the Second Amendment, get America out of its endless foreign wars,
terminate taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood, overturn Roe v Wade and build a wall on our southern border—that
Mexico would pay for—in order to stop the flow of illegal immigration into America.
Now, after two full years of a
Donald Trump administration in which he enjoyed both houses of Congress being held by fellow Republicans, we all
know (and if we don’t, it’s because we don’t WANT to know) that none of the above has happened. Yet, Christians and
conservatives by the millions continue to make excuses for this faker.
First, a brief comment about the
border wall: All of the drama regarding a partial government shutdown and incessant public theater by actors from
both political parties is quite nauseating. Republicans had control of both houses of Congress and the White House
for two years. Why wasn’t money appropriated for the wall then? Why was there no government shutdown over the lack
of funding for the border wall then? Why wait until Democrats take over the House to shut down (partially) the
federal government and threaten to declare a State of National Emergency?
Forgive me, but this stinks to high
heaven. This is nothing but smoke and mirrors. All of the high profile theatrics over the border wall is the
biggest distraction to envelop our country in quite a spell. While everyone is fighting over the wall, some very
serious attacks against our liberties are being waged almost without notice. And all of the hullabaloo over the
wall is completely covering up Trump’s failure to carry out the rest of his campaign promises—and the fact that
Trump himself has often worked in direct opposition to many of his campaign promises.
Secondly, his rhetoric
notwithstanding, President Trump has NOT drawn down America’s involvement in endless foreign wars. Trump’s promise
to bring U.S. forces home from Syria is so much hot air. Trump’s “immediate” withdrawal order is now mired in an
indefinite time schedule. In other words, there is no time schedule. Our troops that are still fighting in Syria
are not only still based in Syria, but they are also still using bases in Iraq as launching pads for military
excursions into Syria. Of course, Trump promised that the U.S. bases in Iraq were not going anywhere—and that’s one
promise he will keep.
Our troops are still fighting
endless wars in Afghanistan andSomalia. In fact, Trump has shoved record military spending through Congress and has done
nothing to reduce America’s global military presence (U.S. troops are stationed in over 160 countries, which equates to 95% of the world’s foreign military bases). America is
as much the global cop as it was when Trump was elected. No, that’s not quite true: We are MUCH MORE the global
cop than when Trump was elected, as Trump has expanded our military presence in Eastern Europe to unprecedented
levels—levels not even seen during the Cold War.
Thirdly, as we have just passed the
46th anniversary of the ignoble Roe v Wade Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion-on-demand nationwide,
unborn children continue to be legally murdered—in spite of the fact that Donald Trump was President and
Republicans controlled both houses of Congress during the past two years. All of Trump’s “pro-life” rhetoric hasn’t
saved the life of a single unborn baby. Since Trump was elected, over 2 million unborn children have been
mercilessly murdered in the wombs of their mothers—with the complete approbation of a Republican-led federal
government.
The GOP controlled the entire
federal government for 4.6 years of G.W. Bush's eight years in office—and they controlled the entire federal
government for the past two years of Donald Trump’s presidency. They did NOTHING about Roe v Wade under Bush, and
they have done NOTHING about Roe v Wade under Trump. These phony pro-life GOP congressmen and senators haven't even
defunded America's largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood.
Fifthly, what about Trump’s promise
to “drain the swamp”? This is one of Trump’s biggest lies of all. Trump never intended to drain the swamp. From the
outset of his presidency, he began appointing mostly CFR globalists, neocons, warmongers, Zionists, corporate
elitists and corrupt government insiders to his administration. And he hasn’t stopped.
I am absolutely sick and tired of
hearing my conservative Christian brethren say things like, “Trump is trying his best, but he’s getting no help
from his cabinet and staff.” Well, DUH! Who picked his cabinet and staff? Trump did.
Then they say things like, “Trump doesn’t really understand these issues; he
really wants to do right, but he’s getting bad advice.” BARF! If he didn’t understand the issues, he’s had two
full years as President of the United States to get caught up. But he continues to make the same
unconstitutional, big-government, warmongering decisions over and over again. The excuse that “he wants to do
right, but is getting bad advice” just doesn’t wash anymore. It’s time for Trump’s supporters to wake up and
realize that Donald Trump is a great big boy, not a little kid, and is fully capable of thinking for
himself.
Donald Trump knows exactly what
he’s doing. He’s known exactly what he’s been doing from day number one. He is the consummate con man. He is a
charlatan. He is a double-tongued pretender. He has filled the executive branch of the federal government with the
same crooks as presidents before him.
And now Trump’s selection of
William Barr as America’s next attorney general is the final straw. There can be NO MORE DOUBT.
William Barr is the swamp
creature’s Swamp Creature. He is the personification of all of the evil and wickedness that has gone on in
Washington, D.C., during the past 30 years. Name the act of criminality, cover-up or act of chicanery that has
taken place in Washington D.C., over the last 30 years, and William Barr is probably neck deep in it.
*Barr was a full-time CIA operative, recruited by Langley out of high
school, starting in 1971. Barr’s youth career goal was to head the CIA.
*CIA operative assigned to the
China directorate, where he became close to powerful CIA operative George H.W. Bush, whose accomplishments
already included the CIA/Cuba Bay of Pigs, Asia CIA operations (Vietnam War, Golden Triangle narcotics), Nixon
foreign policy (Henry Kissinger), and the Watergate operation.
*When George H.W. Bush became CIA
Director in 1976, Barr joined the CIA’s “legal office” and Bush’s inner circle, and worked alongside Bush’s
longtime CIA enforcers Theodore “Ted” Shackley, Felix Rodriguez, Thomas Clines, and others, several of whom were
likely involved with the Bay of Pigs/John F. Kennedy assassination, and numerous southeast Asian operations,
from the Phoenix Program to Golden Triangle narco-trafficking.
*Barr stonewalled and destroyed the
Church Committee investigations into CIA abuses.
*Barr stonewalled and stopped
inquiries in the CIA bombing assassination of Chilean opposition leader Orlando Letelier.
*Barr joined George H.W. Bush’s
legal/intelligence team during Bush’s vice presidency (under President Ronald Reagan). Rose from assistant
attorney general to Chief Legal Counsel to attorney general (1991) during the Bush 41 presidency.
*Barr was a key player in the
Iran-Contra operation, if not the most important member of the apparatus, simultaneously managing the operation
while also “fixing” the legal end, ensuring that all of the operatives could do their jobs without fear of
exposure or arrest.
*In his attorney general
confirmation, Barr vowed to “attack criminal organizations,” drug smugglers and money launderers. It was all hot
air: as AG, Barr would preserve, protect, cover up, and nurture the apparatus that he helped create, and use
Justice Department power to escape punishment.
*Barr stonewalled and stopped
investigations into all Bush/Clinton and CIA crimes, including BCCI and BNL CIA drug banking, the theft of
Inslaw/PROMIS software, and all crimes of state committed by Bush.
*Barr provided legal cover for
Bush’s illegal foreign policy and war crimes.
*Barr left Washington, and went
through the “rotating door” to the corporate world, where he took on numerous directorships and counsel
positions for major companies. In 2007 and again from 2017, Barr was counsel for politically connected
international law firmKirkland & Ellis. Among its other notable attorneys and alumni are Kenneth Starr, John
Bolton, Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and numerous Trump administration attorneys. K&E’s clients
include sex trafficker/pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital.
If all of this isn’t bad enough,
William Bar is a co-conspirator in the murders of Vicki and Sammy Weaver at Ruby Ridge,
Idaho.James Bovard tells the story:
The Senate Judiciary Committee
hearings for Attorney General nominee William Barr have focused heavily on Barr’s views on Special Counsel
Robert Mueller. But nobody is asking about Barr’s legal crusade for blanket immunity for federal agents who
killed American citizens.
Barr received a routine
questionnaire from the Judiciary Committee asking him to disclose his past work including pro bono activities
“serving the disadvantaged.” The “disadvantaged” that Barr spent the most time helping was an FBI agent who
slayed an Idaho mother holding her baby in 1992. Barr spent two weeksorganizing former Attorneys General and others to support “an FBI sniper in
defending against criminal charges in connection with the Ruby Ridge incident.” Barr also “assisted in framing
legal arguments advanced… in the district court and the subsequent appeal to the Ninth Circuit,” he told the
committee.
That charitable work (for an FBI
agent who already had a federally paid law firm defending him) helped tamp down one of the biggest scandals
during Barr’s time as Attorney General from 1991 to early 1993. Barr was responsible for both the U.S. Marshals
Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, two federal agencies whose misconduct at Ruby Ridge
“helped to weaken the bond of trust that must exist between ordinary Americans
and our law enforcement agencies,” according to a 1995 Senate Judiciary Committee report.
After Randy Weaver, an outspoken
white separatist living on a mountaintop in northern Idaho, was entrapped by an undercover federal agent, U.S.
marshals trespassed on Weaver’s land and killed his 14-year-old son, Sammy [by shooting him in the back]. The
following day, FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi killed his wife, Vicki, as she was standing in the cabin doorway [holding
her baby in her arms]. Horiuchi had previously shot Randy Weaver in the back after he stepped out of the cabin.
The suspects were never given a warning or a chance to surrender and had taken no action against FBI agents.
Weaver survived.
Barr told
theNew York Times in 1993 that he was not directly involved in the
Ruby Ridge operation. Two years later, the Washington Post revealed that “top officials of the Bush Justice
Department had at least 20 [phone] contacts concerning Ruby Ridge in the 24 hours before Vicki Weaver was shot,”
including two calls involving Barr.
In January 1995, FBI director Louis
Freeh announced wrist slaps for the FBI officials involved, including his friend Larry Potts, who supervised the
operation from headquarters and who approved the shoot-without-provocation orders that “contravened the
constitution of the United States,” according to the Justice Department internal report.
When Attorney General Janet Reno
later nominated Potts for deputy director of the FBI, top newspapers and members of Congress protested, but Barr
told theNew York Times that his friend Potts “was deliberate and careful, and I developed a great deal of confidence in his
judgment… I can’t think of enough good things to say about him.” A few months later, the FBI suspended Potts after suspected perjury regarding Ruby Ridge. (Potts was
not charged and retired two years later.)
The Justice Department paid $3
million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit from the Weaver family. But when Boundary County, Idaho filed
criminal charges against Horiuchi, Barr sprang to action seeking immunity for FBI snipers. He spearheaded
efforts to sway the court to dismiss all charges because holding a sniper liable would “severely undermine, if not cripple, the ability of future attorneys general to rely on such
specialized units in moments of crisis such as hostage taking and terrorist acts.”
When the Justice Department won an
initial appeals court victory in the case in 2000, federal judge Alex Kozinski warned in a dissent of a
newJames Bond “007 standard for the use of deadly force” against American
citizens. The same court reversed that decision the following year. Kozinski, writing for the majority,
declared: “A group of FBI agents formulated rules of engagement that permitted their
colleagues to hide in the bushes and gun down men who posed no immediate threat. Such wartime rules are patently
unconstitutional for a police action.”
Does William Barr still endorse
“wartime rules” and a “007 standard” that absolve federal agents for questionable shootings of Americans?
Does Barr consider “illegal government killings” to be an oxymoron? Best of all, can Barr explain to us
his understanding of the phrase “government under the law”?
In addition, as far as William Barr
is concerned, the Fourth Amendment does not even exist. Senator Rand Paul notes that Barr "has been a big supporter
of the PATRIOT Act, which lowered the standard for spying on Americans, and he even went so far as to say the
PATRIOT Act was pretty good — we should go much further."
Rand also said that Barr is a “big
fan” of seizing people’s property through civil asset forfeiture. Rand continued by saying that “the first things
I’ve learned about him [Barr] being for more surveillance of Americans is very, very troubling.”
Furthermore (yes, there is more),
William Barr told liberal gun grabber Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) in his senate confirmation hearing for
becoming America’s next attorney general that he fully intends to push forward with Donald Trump’s Hitlerian “take
the guns first, go through due process second” gun confiscation laws, also known as “red flag” laws. And remember:
It was Donald Trump, not Barack Obama, who gave us more gun control by outlawing “bump stocks.”
Yep! The promise to protect the
Second Amendment is another promise Trump has broken (that’s Number Six).
“Red flag” gun confiscation laws
are the same kind of laws that were used to confiscate the weapons of undesirables (meaning anyone the state
doesn’t like) in Hitler’s Germany, Stalin’s Russia, Mao’s China—and in every despotic nation of the
world.
And here isWilliam Barr’s statement that “red flag” gun confiscation laws are the “single most
important thing” government can do regarding gun control.
Internet blogger and longtime
supporter of Donald Trump, Carl F. Worden, recently wrote this:
Now I can understand how Trump fell
for the wrongful nominations of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray.
That was early-on in Trump's presidency and Trump had no way of knowing those he trusted for advice were
in fact Deep State maggots intent on destroying his presidency. But this is a solid two years into Trump's
first term, and it is more than obvious that Barr will not be a team player for Trump -- or us! In fact, Barr
has a very troubling record on Second Amendment issues.
At this time, I have no confidence
left in Donald J. Trump. He is either a complete fool, or he knows exactly what he's doing, and either way
he's not fit to represent me anymore.
No more excuses, Mr.
Trump!
Bravo, Carl!
Sadly, a host of Trump’s supporters
continue to be bamboozled by the elaborate psyops misinformation (translated: propaganda) entity known
asQAnon, which keeps reassuring the Trump faithful that he is covertly waging war against the
globalist insiders and that any day now the curtain is going to collapse on the swamp creatures. It’s all a hoax
to give Trump cover—and more time.
If the nomination of William Barr
as America’s next “Top Cop” doesn’t awaken the “Always Trumpers,” there is absolutely no hope for them. Even worse
is the fact that the longer Christians and conservatives continue to make excuses for Trump’s lies and deceptions,
there is less and less hope for America.
Many pastors and Christians are under the devilish delusion that
the Bible promotes pacifism and non-resistance to tyrannical government. They believe and teach
that, if government decides to outlaw firearms, Christians should sheepishly surrender their arms.
These believers do not understand the Natural and Scriptural doctrine of self-defense.
In this message, Pastor Baldwin examines the life of Abraham as
found in Genesis 14. This is an extremely important chapter of the Bible as it establishes several
laws and principles given by God. This chapter introduces us to Melchizedek, the king and priest of
Jerusalem who blessed Abraham after he had returned from "the slaughter of the kings" in defense of
the inhabitants of the city of Sodom. Hebrews 7 retells the story of Genesis 14 and makes it clear
that Melchizedek was either Christ Himself or a great type of Christ.
The timing of Christ's blessing of Abraham, and his establishment
of several monumental doctrines for mankind, occurring following Abraham's armed defense of his
family and community is extremely significant—and almost universally ignored and overlooked in
modern churches.
As the title of the message states, this is "A Biblical Portrait Of
The Righteousness And Requirement of Bearing Arms." Bearing arms for self-defense—which in the
modern world points to AR-15-style rifles—is both RIGHTEOUS and REQUIRED of us by the laws of God.
(Cont Nxt Column)
Unless you are over sixty-years-old, it is very likely that you
have never heard a message like this before--and with the kind of compromising, watered-down
preaching heard in most churches today, if you don't watch this one, you may never hear one like it
in your lifetime.
But the truths of this message are undeniable and sacrosanct. And
with the way that government--and many churches--are promoting the outlawing and surrender of
AR-15-style rifles, this message is absolutely essential to the understanding of God's law on this
subject--not to mention the survival of liberty in our land.
Today the debate over firearms rages, and on the heels of national
tragedy and death, schools and other places have become "gun-free zones"—and killing fields. In
addition, many in government are attempting to pass laws disarming the American people, beginning
with banning AR-15 rifles. And, sadly, a host of pastors and churches are telling their
congregations that Christians are obligated to surrender their firearms should civil government
require them to do so. Such teaching is an egregious violation of the Word of God.
Written by Dr. Chuck Baldwin and his son, Attorney Tim Baldwin, "To
Keep or Not To Keep: Why Christians Should Not Give Up Their Guns" is a CLASSIC defense of the
right to keep and bear arms—not just from a Constitutional perspective—but from a Biblical one. We
don't know of another book like this one on the market today.
Read this book and you will see why NO ONE—Christian or
otherwise—should surrender their arms and why stripping Americans of their right to keep and bear
the AR-15 rifle in particular is to in effect disarm the citizenry.
Pastor Baldwin is so determined to maintain the right to possess
the AR-15 rifle that he has said, "When my AR-15 rifle is outlawed, I will be an outlaw." This bold
statement is spoken not only out of adherence to the Second Amendment but more importantly out of
adherence to God's Natural and Biblical laws. This book brilliantly explains those eternal
laws.
Not since British troops marched on Lexington and Concord,
Massachusetts, during the early morning of April 19, 1775, to seize the weapons of the colonists
has the American people's right to keep and bear arms been under such a direct attack.
Dr. Baldwin has shown in previous messages the Biblical duty of
self-defense. In this message, he uses Nehemiah 4, the Book of Judges, Esther, Romans 15:4, and
Ephesians 6:12 to show that the attacks against armed men are as much spiritual in nature as they
are political and physical.
Pastor Baldwin goes on to show how Christians need to be watchful
and alert to these attacks and be prepared to repel these attacks with both spiritual and Natural
armor.
Humanly speaking, the only thing keeping America's (and the rest of
the free world's) liberties intact (to the degree that they are) is the fact that America is an
ARMED citizenry. Remove the arms from the American people, and the entire world would plunge into a
500-year period of medievalesque Dark Ages.
This message is absolutely vital to the understanding of God's
truth relative to the subject of Christian liberty and the duty of men to protect it.
*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial
opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this
link:
Trump's
Speech After Shootings Paves Way
For A Dramatic Loss Of Rights, Censorship & PreCrime
An Open Letter To Our Legislators, Judges And Lawmen
LibertyFellowshipMT
Published on Mar 17, 2019
These letter was written by Dr. Chuck Baldwin and read live prior to the message preached by
Pastor Chuck Baldwin on Sunday, March 17, 2019 during the service at Liberty Fellowship.
Pastor Chuck Baldwin Exposes Donald
Trump's Broken Promise To Protect The 2nd
Amendment
Donald Trump promised the American people that he would protect our 2nd Amendment. No promise Trump
made was more emphatic than his promise to protect the 2nd Amendment.
But now President Trump has joined anti-gun Democrats by becoming the loudest proponent for more
draconian gun control laws, including universal background checks and "red flag" gun confiscation laws.
Donald Trump's betrayal of the 2nd Amendment is inexcusable--and unforgivable.
The NRA is compromised and in complete disarray and will be no help. It is up to the people who
voted for Donald Trump to stop this. If they do not rise up en masse NOW and let Trump know in no uncertain terms
that he has lost their vote FOREVER if he enacts these egregious gun control and gun confiscation laws, Trump will
go down in history as having enacted more communistic gun control laws than any president since Lyndon Baines
Johnson in the 1960s.
In this video, Pastor Baldwin presents the clarion call for everyone in America who cherishes their
right to keep and bear arms to rally en masse against these police-state gun control laws before it's too late.
This is not about Republicans or Democrats, right or left or who wins an election. The right to
keep and bear arms is more important than any election and any political party. The right to keep and bear arms is
about FREEDOM.
Please share this video with as many friends and loved ones as you can. We only have a short time
to stop these Orwellian gun control laws from coming into existence. We only have a short time to make Donald Trump
accountable to his promise to protect the 2nd Amendment.
"We are not talking about gun control. We are talking about
GUN CONFISCATION." - Chuck
Baldwin, This Is Deadly Serious! March 14, 2019 -
Call any Congressman via 202-225-3121 or
202-224-3121
WARNING:
Alex Jones & Mike Adams Are Pushing a Faux "Revolution"
The Conscious Resistance
Published on Sep 24, 2018
Derrick Broze examines recent videos from Alex Jones and Mike Adams claiming that Trump will
declare martial law. These men and infowars are not to be trusted. They are going to help create the perfect
conditions for a civil war that the ruling class will use to enact complete control.
The Conscious Resistance Network is an independent media organization focused on empowering individuals through
education, philosophy, health, and community organizing. We work to create a world where corporate and state power
does not rule over the lives of free human beings.
Our work is supported by SmartCash, the business focused, user-friendly & decentralized
crypto-currency. www.smartcash.cc
Support our work: Patreon.com/DerrickBroze
Alex Jones Does 180 on Police State
Advocates Military Be Used to Arrest US Citizens to Resolve Contrived Left-Right Tensions
"...They're going to guillotine everybody and have a communist utopia and they're all nodding 'we're going to kill
the conservatives and the christians, we're going to kill them'. And these are marches with hundreds of thousands
of people nodding their head, 'We are going to kill you.' As far as I'm concerned, the safest thing to do would
just to be, have Trump, just go ahead and have the Army go ahead and
arrest these people. We are in a red alert right now; we need to have
the Army just arrest these people. And I guarantee you George Washington, if stuff like
this was going on, would go arrest the people that were doing it."
-- Alex Jones, vid: Is The Civil War Here NOW?, WeAreChange
Jul 2, 2018 --
"...And this comes from a man who made four, not one, not
two, not three, four movies called The Police State and
even another one called Martial Law 911 warning the
general public about the use of the US Army domestically inside The United States. This is a man who is most well
known for warning the American public about the rise of the police state, who has now completely turned 180 degrees
and is ultimately calling for martial law in the streets to arrest people who are protesting the
government!"
-- Luke Rudkowski, vid: Is The Civil War Here NOW?,
WeAreChange Jul 2, 2018 --
** For more information go to the False Left-Right Paradigm page and look at the section: Alex Jones
Paradigm Pivot **
...ALL OTHER INFOWARSCONTENT BELOW IS BEFORE 2016 WHEN THEY SOLD OUT!
Infowars Employees Expose Alex Jones
Know More News
Published on Oct 4, 2017
Former Alex Jones employees and guests speak out about the big problems going on at Infowars
"The globalists create confusion by design
so that people see a smokescreen and can't figure out what's going on and that they hope would
just roll over and give up."
-- Alex Jones, vid: Trump Puppeted By Pro-War
Left To Attack Syria --
Adaptation and
Conformity The Selling Out of Alex Jones/Infowars Link:Psywars
In 2009, less than two months after Barack Obama was inaugurated as president, Alex Jones/Infowars
released a documentary (The Obama Deception) exposing him as a mask used by the corrupt
power elite to instigate and provide cover to their machinations. Central to this presentation was
the “real” executive power structure. “…The president serves the military industrial complex,
itself owned by the international bankers.” However, in 2017, though Donald Trump was a puppet like
his predecessor, Alex Jones promoted him as a maverick outside of this systemic corruption that has
plagued America since Dwight D. Eisenhower coined the phrase, “Military Industrial Complex.” Using
the war in Yemen—which has produced the greatest humanitarian crisis on earth—as a case example,
The Trump Jones Deception shows how both men were yet another mask of deceit worn by the
corrupt establishment.
S.C. National Guard Conducts Door to
Door
"Wellness Checks"(Gun Confiscations) Exercises
Published on Mar 10, 2015
Operation Vigilant Guard which we exposed 5 years ago as an exercise to set up gun
confiscations and intern citizens is being run across the country under the guise of helping citizens. Even though
we've seen
National Guard go door to door and confiscate guns after Hurricane Katrina.
UN Accelerates Plan For Global Gun
Confiscation After Collapse United Nations hiring 'disarmament,
demobilization and reintegration' officers
The United Nations is gearing up for gun
confiscation in the event of a societal collapse in numerous countries by hiring “disarmament, demobilization and
reintegration” officers who will be trained to seize guns “from the civilian population.”
A posting on the
United Nations Career Opportunities page announces a vacancy for the position of “Disarmament,
Demobilization and Reintegration Officer” under the UN’s Department of Peacekeeping Operations based out of New
York.
UN Publicly Prepares For Gun Confiscation In
US
We know they have been planning it for years, and the documents are legion.
Now they are preparing to go operational.
The UN’s page on DDR operations explains what role the DDR officer
will be expected to undertake;
Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of
small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons from combatants and often from the civilian
population.
Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active
combatants from armed forces and groups, including a phase of “reinsertion” which provides short-term
assistance to ex-combatants.
Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian
status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is a political, social and economic process with an open
time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level.
The objective of the DDR process is to contribute to security and stability in post-conflict
environments so that recovery and development can begin. DDR helps create an enabling environment for political
and peace processes by dealing with security problem that arises when ex-combatants are trying to adjust to
normal life, during the vital transition period from conflict to peace and development.
Although the posting prompted feverish speculation that the UN was about to embark on a mass gun
confiscation program within the United States, it’s important to note that the DDR program is only currently active
in countries like the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ivory Coast and Haiti.
However, concerns are understandable given the acceleration in anti-Second Amendment rhetoric and
executive action on behalf of the Obama administration since the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre.
During a town hall event last week, Hillary Clinton asserted that gun control opponents should not be allowed
to hold an opinion that “terrorizes” America.
Earlier this month, President Barack
Obama also cited Australia’s draconian gun confiscation program as an example to be followed by the
U.S.
“It’s no secret that the US government has been preparing riot gear, guns, ammunition, and
detention centers for a
major calamity that will likely involve violence and widespread civil
unrest,”
writes Mac Slavo. Should such an event ever take place the first order of business will include a declaration
of martial law. And just as we saw during Hurricane Katrina, when the U.S. Constitution has been suspended gun
confiscation is soon to follow.”
Since the 1990′s, Alex Jones and Infowars reporters have attended numerous urban warfare training
drills inside the United States, many of which included exercises based around disarming American citizens. Foreign
troops were also present at many of these drills.
Infowars first became aware of this story a week ago having been contacted by active duty military
officials who saw the advertisement before it was posted publicly and we are currently working on a deeper angle
that promises to provide further insight.
For anyone who still doubts that domestic gun confiscation would be plausible in the aftermath of a
catastrophe, watch the short documentary below which highlights how authorities exploited Hurricane Katrina to
seize firearms, including those belonging to residents who weren’t even affected by the disaster.
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Friday, July 6, 2012
A newly leaked US Army Military Police
training manual for “Civil Disturbance Operations” outlines how military assets are to be used domestically to
quell riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.
The document (PDF),
which is dated 2006 and was used for a self-learning course at the U.S. Army Military Police School at Fort
McClellan, makes it clear that the operations described in the manual apply to both “CONUS and OCONUS,” meaning
inside the Continental United States and outside the Continental United States.
The document outlines how military assets will be used to “help local and state authorities to
restore and maintain law and order” in the event of mass riots, civil unrest or a declaration of martial law.
The primary function of military assets will be focused around, “breaking up unauthorized
gatherings and by patrolling the disturbance area to prevent the commission of lawless acts,” states the document,
adding, “during operations to restore order, military forces may present a show of force, establish roadblocks,
break up crowds, employ crowd control agents, patrol, serve as security forces or reserves, and perform other
operations as required.”
The manual also describes how prisoners will be processed through temporary internment camps under
the guidance of U.S. Army FM 3-19.40 Internment/Resettlement Operations, which as we
reported earlier this year, outlines how internees would be “re-educated” into developing an “appreciation of
U.S. policies” while detained in prison camps inside the United States.
On page 20 of the manual, rules regarding the use of “deadly force” in confronting “dissidents” are
made disturbingly clear with the directive that a, “Warning shot will not be fired.”
The manual includes lists of weapons to be used against “rioters” or “demonstrators,” including
“antiriot grenades.” It also advises troops to carry their guns in the “safe port arms” stance, a psychological
tactic aimed at “making a show of force before rioters.” Non-lethal weapons and water cannons are also
included.
The document also explains how the military will be involved in spying on and gathering information
on dissidents to identify the, “Existence of persons, groups, or organizations which have distinctively threatened
or are creating disturbances.”
“Crowd control agents” will also be deployed for the purpose of “reducing resistance,” states the
manual, which also implies that troops will be used to confiscate firearms.
“Restrictions on the sale, transfer, and possession of sensitive material such as gasoline,
firearms, ammunition, and explosives will help control forces in minimizing certain forms of violence,” states the
document on page 40.
“Consideration may be given to evacuating sensitive items, such as weapons from stores,” the manual
also states on page 27.
The document emphasizes how troops should make every effort, “to avoid appearing as an alien
invading force and to present the image of a restrained and well-disciplined force whose sole purpose is to help to
restore law and order with a minimum loss of life and property.”
This 115 page manual represents a shocking new insight into how the U.S. military will be used
domestically to violently quell unrest in the aftermath of a total economic collapse or other national
emergency.
Preparations for using troops to deal with mass civil unrest on U.S. soil have been in the works
for years.
Back in 2008, U.S. troops returning from Iraq were earmarked
for “homeland patrols” with one of their roles including helping with “civil unrest and crowd
control”.
In December 2008, the Washington
Post reported on plans to station 20,000 more U.S. troops inside America for purposes of “domestic
security” from September 2011 onwards, an expansion of Northcom’s militarization of the country in preparation for
potential civil unrest following a total economic collapse or a mass terror attack.
A report produced that same year by the U.S.
Army War College’s Strategic Institute warned that the United States may experience massive civil unrest
in the wake of a series of crises which it termed “strategic shock.”
“Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities
in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security,” stated the report, authored by [Ret.] Lt.
Col. Nathan Freir, adding that the military may be needed to quell “purposeful domestic resistance”.
Rex 84, short for
Readiness Exercise 1984, was established under the pretext of a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossing the
Mexican/US border.
During the Iran-Contra hearings in 1987, however, it was revealed that the program was a secretive “scenario and
drill” developed by the federal government to suspend the Constitution, declare martial law, assign military
commanders to take over state and local governments, and detain large numbers of American citizens determined by
the government to be “national security threats.”
With many Americans now becoming
“pre-revolutionary” as a result of their fury at the Obama administration and equally unpopular lawmakers
in Washington, potential civil unrest could spring not just from a poverty-stricken underclass, but also the
shrinking middle class.
Perhaps that’s why the Department of Homeland Security is increasingly focusing its anti-terror apparatus on
white middle class Americans, portraying them
as domestic terrorists in a series of PSA videos. In addition, ‘Occupy’ protesters are also now being
characterized as
terrorists.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison
Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones
Show and Infowars Nightly News.
This article was posted: Friday, July 6, 2012 at 11:26 am
Alex Jones highlights three instances and numerous articles in the last year and a half where soldiers have
contacted his radio show to warn of the Army’s litmus tests, which gauge whether they will fire on American
citizens or engage in gun confiscation.
This article was posted: Thursday, October 24, 2013 at 1:38 pm
As the National Guard trains with other civilian agencies to react to a natural
disasters, gun confiscation is one of their training exercises. But due to pushback from the American people they
have now changed the name to door to door "wellness checks". It's important to show this video to all service men,
they need to speak out about these illegal activities and refuse to participate if asked. National guardsman are
the last line of defense, it is important to educate them so they will not be pawns in a federal government gun
confiscation program.
"Complete disarmament" of the American people
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Monday, July 16, 2012
The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been identified by
observers as a flagrant threat to the second amendment and which Barack Obama is determined to sign has its roots
in a 1961 State Department memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee "complete disarmament" of
the American people under the ruse of preventing war. The UN Arms Treaty has caused so much controversy because it
outlines a plan to target "all types of conventional weapons, notably including small arms and light weapons,"
according to Forbes' Larry Bell.
Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement "is trying to act as though this is really
just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here
is domestic firearms control."
A letter sent last month by 130 Republican House members to President Obama argued that the treaty should be
rejected because it infringes on the "fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms". The letter adds that
"...the U.N.'s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national
security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights."
Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents and "international crime
syndicates," the UN is busy trying to imply that all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a global
scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority. This is precisely the same language
used in a 1961 U.S. State Department briefing which outlined a long term agenda to carry out a "Program for General
and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World."
Invoking the threat of nuclear warfare, the document spells out a plan to create a "United Nations Peace Force"
that would "enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds."
While the document initially focuses on scrapping nuclear weapons, it later makes it clear that the only groups
allowed to own weapons of any kind would be governing authorities, "for the purpose of maintaining internal order,"
and the UN "peacekeeping" force itself, which would require "agreed manpower."
"The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the
U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted
to peaceful purposes," states the document. While the memorandum outlines a broader mandate to destroy national
sovereignty, eviscerate national armies and institute the UN as the planet's supreme authority with a world army,
the document serves as a stark reminder that the plan for the United Nations to oversee the abolition of the second
amendment has been in the works for decades.
As Bell points out in his Forbes article, the threat of the Obama administration relying on a UN
treaty to do what successive administrations have tried but failed to accomplish -- taking a huge bite out of the
second amendment -- is by no means far fetched.
After all, a plethora of UN treaties and international agreements have already stripped the United
States of its sovereignty and its power to decide its own laws. The power to authorize U.S. involvement in wars and
conflicts has now been almost completely stripped from Congress and handed to the United Nations.
Litmus test includes question of whether top brass are
comfortable
with ordering NCOs to fire on U.S. citizens
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
October 23, 2013
Former Navy SEAL Ben Smith warns that the Obama
administration is asking top brass in the military if they would be comfortable with disarming U.S. citizens, a
litmus test that includes gauging whether they would be prepared to order NCOs to fire on Americans.
Smith provoked headlines last week when he
appeared
on Fox News to assert that the federal government was trying to provoke veterans into violence as an
excuse to implement martial law.
Speaking exclusively to the Alex Jones Show, Smith stated, “Going back to the beginning of this
administration, I’ve had friends within the community talking about how they were brought in and questioned with
people from more towards the top side and the questioning….where it was pointing was do you feel comfortable
disarming American citizens,” adding that this was one of the many “funny things” occurring within the
military.
When Smith was asked by radio host Alex Jones if this line of questioning included a litmus test
whereby military officers were asked if they would fire on U.S. citizens, he responded in the affirmative.
Smith linked the premise to former Obama advisor Van Jones, who was forced to resign in September
2009 after his links with a Marxist organization were revealed.
“You drop the radical pose for the radical ends,” said Smith, paraphrasing Van Jones.
The idea of U.S. soldiers being asked if they will fire on American citizens during a crisis or
mass disarmament program has emerged from several different sources over the last two decades.
In January, 2009
Nobel Peace Prize nominee Jim Garrow claimed he was told by a top military veteran that the Obama
administration’s “litmus test” for new military leaders is whether or not they will obey an order to fire on U.S.
citizens.
Concerns over U.S. troops being given orders to fire on American citizens in the event of mass gun
confiscation first arose in May 1994 when hundreds of Marines at 29 Palms, California were given a survey as part of an academic project by Navy
Lieutenant Commander Ernest Guy Cunningham which asked the Marines if they would, “Fire upon U.S. citizens who
refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the United States government.”
The survey was subsequently leaked because many of the Marines who took it were shocked by the tone
of the question.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is
the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
This article was posted: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 at 6:01 am
Dr. Jim Garrow is a renowned author and whistleblower who
has been nominated for a Nobel peace prize for his humanitarian work. He is the author of The Pink Pagoda: One
Man’s Quest to End Gendercide in China.
He has spent over $25 million over the past sixteen years rescuing an estimated 40,000 baby Chinese girls from
near-certain death under China’s one-child-per-couple policy by facilitating international adoptions. He is the
founder and executive director of the Bethune Institute’s Pink Pagoda schools, private English-immersion schools
for Chinese children. Today he runs 168 schools with nearly 6,300 employees.
Dr Garrow was recently contacted by a high ranking military official who implored him to reveal the truth about
a “litmus test” that is being proposed by the Obama administration to the military asking the question “will you
shoot Americans if they won’t give you their guns?”
This article was posted: Thursday, March 28, 2013 at 6:33 am
Police Chief Questioned Over Obama Gun
Confiscation
Alex Jones and Anthony Guicciardi question San Antonio Police Chief McManus about whether
he would obey
the Constitution or the President if ordered to confiscate firearms
Chris - 45th Infantry: Confiscated Guns After Katrina,
Reports Theft & Rape by NOPD!
Dan Feidt: Military Prepares for Martial Law
Takeover
A newly leaked US Army Military Police
training manual for "Civil Disturbance Operations" outlines how military assets are to be used domestically to
quell riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.
The document (PDF), which is dated 2006 and was used for a self-learning course at the U.S. Army Military Police
School at Fort McClellan, makes it clear that the operations described in the manual apply to both "CONUS and
OCONUS," meaning inside the Continental United States and outside the Continental United States.
The document outlines how military assets will be used to "help local and state authorities to restore and maintain
law and order" in the event of mass riots, civil unrest or a declaration of martial law.
The primary function of military assets will be focused around, "breaking up unauthorized gatherings and by
patrolling the disturbance area to prevent the commission of lawless acts," states the document, adding, "during
operations to restore order, military forces may present a show of force, establish roadblocks, break up crowds,
employ crowd control agents, patrol, serve as security forces or reserves, and perform other operations as
required."
The manual also describes how prisoners will be processed through temporary internment camps under the guidance of
U.S. Army FM 3-19.40 Internment/Resettlement Operations, which as we reported earlier this year, outlines how
internees would be "re-educated" into developing an "appreciation of U.S. policies" while detained in prison camps
inside the United States.
On page 20 of the manual, rules regarding the use of "deadly force" in confronting "dissidents" are made
disturbingly clear with the directive that a, "Warning shot will not be fired."
The manual includes lists of weapons to be used against "rioters" or "demonstrators," including "antiriot
grenades." It also advises troops to carry their guns in the "safe port arms" stance, a psychological tactic aimed
at "making a show of force before rioters." Non-lethal weapons and water cannons are also included.
The document also explains how the military will be involved in spying on and gathering information on dissidents
to identify the, "Existence of persons, groups, or organizations which have distinctively threatened or are
creating disturbances."
"Crowd control agents" will also be deployed for the purpose of "reducing resistance," states the manual, which
also implies that troops will be used to confiscate firearms.
"Restrictions on the sale, transfer, and possession of sensitive material such as gasoline, firearms, ammunition,
and explosives will help control forces in minimizing certain forms of violence," states the document on page
40.
Banking Cartel Set to Use Military Against Americans
for Final Showdown!
Alex breaks down the banking cartels final assault against the american people, in what will
become the 2nd american revolution!
CONPLAN 3502: Militarization of Police & Local
Govt,
Pandora's Box Unleashed!
Alex welcomes Dan Feidt, who posted a U.S. Army Civil Disturbance Operations training course
document instructing soldiers to break up "unauthorized gatherings" by "dissident elements" in the United States.
Feidt also runs the site HongPong.com, a website dedicated to exposing "information operations, spinstorms, and
latent contraditions." http://www.hongpong.com/
Infowars has confirmed the identity and authenticity of
the source of the video below as a member of the U.S. Army military police in Arizona.
The video, shot in September 2013, shows an army commander
briefing the MPs on their new command structure under the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Department of
Homeland Security for domestic operations with the National Guard.
The MP began recording the exchange after being shocked to hear that they were now under FEMA control.
In this video you can clearly hear the commander discuss the suspension of the
Constitution for martial law and gun confiscations in America.
In essence, the military police is to provide security for FEMA while the agency confiscates our guns during a
government-declared domestic crisis.
“They did that in Katrina, right,” the commander said. “They just go on and take away people’s guns.”
This is yet another piece of the larger pattern of demonization of gun owners, libertarians, conservatives,
Christians and anyone who will not bow down to enslavement by a hijacked government occupied by ruthless tyrants
who desire only total control.
We’ve already seen gun confiscations in the wake of Hurricane Katrina in 2005:
More to come — this article will be updated further.
This article was posted: Saturday, October 26, 2013 at 12:47 pm
“People in general just will NOT,
take their heads out of the sand!”
Psyops, or psychological operations, is a term used to describe the
techniques of psychological manipulation used in warfare. These operations are used to deceive, confuse, disrupt
and demoralize the enemy, with an aim toward weakening enemy resistance or even causing enemy forces to surrender
and enemy populations to capitulate.
Who You Are – Collected information includes names, addresses, biometrics,
social media accounts .
What You Do – Travel history, communications, financial transactions and
movement of physical assets.
Who You Know – Relational information including family, friends, associates
and organizations.
Context – Contextual data such as demographics, politics, cultural norms
and religion.
Acloser look at the upcoming
Jade Helm military exercise, specifically its
“master the human domain” motto, reveals a larger agenda in regards to domestic policy.
...“They’re building an infrastructure of tyranny,” stated Infowars David Knight.
“There’s a legal infrastructure with things like the NDAA, there’s a technical
infrastructure with things like the capability to do dragnet surveillance, and then of course there is going to be
a military and law enforcement infrastructure, and those are merging.”
Document: Army Preparing to Use
Lethal Force Against “Unarmed Civilians” During “Full Scale Riots” in U.S.
Training manual outlines "sniper response"
during crowd control operations
by Paul Joseph Watson | August 18, 2014
A document released by the U.S. Army
details preparations for “full scale riots” within the United States during which troops may be forced to engage in
a “lethal response” to deal with unruly crowds of demonstrators.
The appearance of the document amidst growing unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, with the National Guard
now being called in to deal with the disorder, is an ominous coincidence.
The 132-page document, titled U.S. Army Techniques Publication 3-39.33: Civil
Disturbances (PDF), was written in April 2014 and recently obtained by Public Intelligence.
The document makes it clear that the techniques detailed therein are to be applied both outside
and inside the “continental United States (CONUS)” in the event of “unruly and violent crowds” where
it is “necessary to quell riots and restore public order.”
The training manual outlines scenarios under
which, “Civil unrest may range from simple, nonviolent protests that address specific issues, to events that turn
into full-scale riots.”
The most shocking aspect of the document is the fact that it describes the deployment of a “lethal
response” directed against “unarmed civilians,” including “sniper response” and “small arms direct fire.”
Under the heading “sniper response,” the document states, “Ensure that target leaders or
troublemakers are targeted,” in addition to a passage which states, “Exploit the psychological effect of an
attack.”
Under the heading “small arms direct fire,”
the manual states, “Escalate gradually, starting with a small caliber, single round and work up to a large caliber,
automatic.”
Another graphic which depicts “escalation of trauma” directs soldiers how to use “riot batons” in
order to cause the necessary level of injury or death to the subject. “Deadly force final target areas” include the
back of the neck, the solar plexus, the neck, the spine and the head.
In light of events in Ferguson, where a
predominantly black community has faced off with militarized police, it’s interesting to note that the manual makes
reference to civil unrest that can arise out of “ethnic hatred” and, “Community unrest (that) results in urban
conflicts that arise from highly emotional social and economic issues.” The document also mentions how rioters
target “retail stores,” as happened during the looting in Ferguson.
“Significant ethnic differences in a community can create an atmosphere of distrust, even hatred……
(and) can cause an eruption of civil disorder that can lead to full riots,” states the document.
Although the document makes reference to the Constitutional rights of American citizens it goes on
to stress that such protections are null and void under a state of emergency, asserting that Posse Comitatus, which
is supposed to limit the power of the federal government to use military personnel domestically, “does not apply”
under declared “emergency authority” or “When the need for the protection of federal property or federal functions
exists.”
It is important to stress that this training manual applies to U.S. Army operations in foreign
countries as well as domestically on U.S. soil. Indeed, section 2-18 of the document goes into detail about
domestic protests such as the 1999 anti-WTO demonstration in Seattle.
The emergence of the document as National Guard troops prepare to descend on Ferguson, Missouri to
deal with looting and civil unrest follows a report we published
just a few weeks before the outbreak of the Ferguson riots which documented how National Guard troops were
training to detain unruly African-American citizens in prison camps before handing them over to police.
In a special video report, Alex Jones documented how the story was part of wider preparations by
the government for domestic disorder that have been ongoing for years.
We have reported previously on similar documents that outline how the U.S. Army would be forced to
resort to lethal measures in order to deal with unruly Americans during times of emergency within the United
States.
In 2012 we
coveredFM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations, a U.S. Army manual that describes how
political activists in prison camps will be indoctrinated by specially assigned psychological operations officers.
The document makes numerous references to how government agencies like the DHS, ICE and FEMA will be involved in
the domestic internment of U.S. citizens during “civil support operations.”
A second US
Army Military Police manual that was leaked months later also outlined how military assets would be used
domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.
A report produced in 2008 by the U.S.
Army War College’s Strategic Institute warned that the United States may experience massive civil unrest
in the wake of a series of crises which it termed “strategic shock.”
“Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to
reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security,” stated the report, authored by [Ret.] Lt.
Col. Nathan Freir, adding that the military may be needed to quell “purposeful domestic resistance”.
Rex 84, short for
Readiness Exercise 1984, was established under the pretext of a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossing the
Mexican/US border.
During the Iran-Contra hearings in 1987, however, it was revealed that the program was a secretive
“scenario and drill” developed by the federal government to suspend the Constitution, declare martial law, assign
military commanders to take over state and local governments, and detain large numbers of American citizens
determined by the government to be “national security threats.”
WRAL characterizes firearms
enthusiasts as a
“threat akin to sex offenders,” says NC resident
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Tuesday, July 17, 2012
News station
WRAL has caused outrage amongst gun rights activists by listing address details of firearms owners in Raleigh,
North Carolina – prompting critics to complain they are being treated like sex offenders and left open to criminal
predation.
In an article about firearms training, a WRAL.com
article homes in on the fact that rural areas have a much
higher per capita rate of concealed carry permit holders.
The story also mentions efforts to increase regulation on concealed
carry permit holders and quotes Gail Neely, executive director of North Carolinians Against Gun Violence, who
claims that “concealed weapons permit holders aren’t as law-abiding as they are reputed to be.”
However, the part that really has second amendment proponents up in
arms is a searchable box that allows the public to identify where concealed carry permit holders live, by typing in
the street name, city, county and zip code.
Although concealed carry permit holders cannot be identified down
their precise address, in many rural areas there are just a handful of houses on one street, and sometimes just one
or two, leaving gun owners open to criminal predation.
As concerned resident David Knight told us via email, “Although
street numbers are not shown (yet), as they point out most of the carry permits are in rural areas. On my road for
example, there are only 4 home sites. On many rural roads there are only 1 or 2 houses. This information has
previously only been available by written request from the State Bureau of Investigation.”
Indeed, when activist group
Grass Roots Norths Carolina (GRNC) complained to WRAL, the news station
responded by erroneously claiming the data was publicly available, when in fact it can only be obtained via an
application to the SBI.
Knight says the news station’s act of helping the public identify gun
owners is an attempt to name and shame while suggesting that second amendment advocates “pose a potential threat
akin to sex offenders.”
GRNC’s F. Paul Valone wrote an email to WRAL demanding that the
search function be removed and that WRAL issue a public apology to gun owners in North Carolina, noting that the
group had received dozens of complaints focused around concern that the search box would potentially expose
“concealed handgun permit-holders to criminal predation.”
The group also threatened to use its database of 60,000 gun owners to
target WRAL’s advertisers for a boycott unless the search feature was removed.
In a follow up conversation, WRAL General Manager Steve
Hammel admitted that street numbers had initially appeared for some records before they were removed, but the
station refused to withdraw the search function. GRNC responded by providing contact information for numerous
people at WRAL as part of an email campaign to boycott the station’s sponsors until the offending item is
deep-sixed.
This is by no means the first time that news media organizations or
government bodies have attempted to shame gun owners by listing their private details for public
inspection.
A similar controversy ensued last year when Illinois’ Attorney General ordered law enforcement to make a list of 1.3 million gun owners
available to the media. The New York Times also obtained a list of gun owners in New York City two weeks
beforehand.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer
for Prison
Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a
regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
Why must all
decent non-violent people fight against "gun control"? Why is the
right to keep and bear arms truly a fundamental individual right? You can find the answers in this new
book.
People frequently ask why we are so dedicated to our cause? This book answers that
question by collecting the key facts and arguments in one place.
People have asked us to present the whole JPFO argument in one place. We have done
it. Available now in an easy-reading format and a handy size, the new book is
entitledDeath by Gun Control: The Human Cost of Victim
Disarmament.
The message is simple: Disarmed people are neither free nor safe - they become the
criminals' prey and the tyrants' playthings. When the civilians are defenseless and their government goes bad,
however, thousands and millions of innocents die.
Professor R.J. Rummel, author of the monumental
bookDeath by Government,said: "Concentrated political power is the most dangerous thing on earth." For power to
concentrate and become dangerous, the citizens must be disarmed.
What disarms the citizens? The idea of "gun control." It's the idea that only the
government has the right to possess firearms, and that citizens have no unalienable right to use force to defend
against aggression.
Death by Gun Controlcarefully
examines the "gun control" idea: its meaning, its purposes, its effects. It comes in many forms, but in every form
it enables the evildoers and works against righteous defense.
•Government permit system
•Ban on private ownership
China, Red
1949-1952
1957-1960
1966-1976
Political opponents;
Rural populations
Enemies of the state
20-35 million
Act of Feb. 20, 1951
Act of Oct. 22, 1957
•Prison or death to "counter-revolutionary criminals" and anyone resisting any government
program
•Death penalty for supply guns to such "criminals"
Guatemala
1960-1981
Mayans & other Indians;
political enemies
100,000-
200,000
Decree 36, Nov 25 •Act of 1932
Decree 386, 1947
Decree 283, 1964
•Register guns & owners •Licensing with high fees
•Prohibit carrying guns
•Bans on guns, sharp tools
•Confiscation powers
Uganda
1971-1979
Christians
Political enemies
300,000
Firearms Ordinance, 1955
Firearms Act, 1970
•Register all guns & owners •Licenses for transactions
•Warrantless searches •Confiscation powers
Cambodia
(Khmer Rouge)
1975-1979
Educated Persons;
Political enemies
2 million
Art. 322-328, Penal Code
Royal Ordinance 55, 1938
•Licenses for guns, owners, ammunition & transactions
•Photo ID with fingerprints
•License inspected quarterly
Rwanda
1994
Tutsi people
800,000
Decree-Law No. 12, 1979
•Register guns, owners, ammunition •Owners must justify need •Concealable guns illegal
•Confiscating powers
Truth
They Cannot Refute
Death by Gun Control delivers the
essential - and gut wrenching -- truth that the anti-self defense "gun control" advocates never try to refute. They
simply cannot refute the facts or the formula.
Here's the Formula:Hatred +
Government + Disarmed Civilians = Genocide
What makes the argument so powerful? Two factors. First, it makes common sense:
unarmed defenseless people have no hope against armed aggressors. Second, it states the historical truth: evil
governments did wipe out 170,000,000 innocent non-military lives in the 20th Century alone.
Using the facts inDeath by Gun
Control, you can take down the enemies of the Bill of Rights. The
rights-destroyers have no answers to these facts. They have no excuses for their killer ideas.
JPFO's work has already borne fruit. John R. Bolton, an under-Secretary of State
for the United States, this year urged the United Nations to recognize how an "oppressed non-state group defending
itself from a genocidal government" will need ready access to firearms. Mr. Bolton might have been the first U.S.
official in modern history to have argued to the UN that private citizens might need to be armed against their own
killer governments.
Paul Harvey, the world-renowned and much admired radio commentator, last year
reportedly broadcast the JPFO-produced facts linking "gun control" to the genocide of millions of unarmed
civilians. Country by country, Mr. Harvey counted the murdered victims of civilian disarmament policies.
Our new book could inspire other opinion-makers to join the chorus. Chapters in
the book teach about:
The essential meaning of "gun control"
The Genocide Formula
The laws and policies that led to mega murder in Cambodia, China, Nazi
Germany, Guatemala, Rwanda, Ottoman Turkey, Uganda, USSR
Zimbabwe's land invasions and firearms confiscations
Soaring crime in Britain after gun prohibition
Violence and police state polices in Japan
The right and duty of armed self-defense in Judaism and both Protestant and
Catholic Christianity
Racist roots of "gun control" in America
The United Nations program to disarm civilians worldwide
Police state polices that condition Americans to accept victim
disarmament.
Contributors: Leading Lights for
Liberty
There is much more.Death by Gun
Control features articles contributed by:
James Bovard(Introduction): "Not every firearms regulation
leads inexorably to genocide. ... But there is no trigger guard on political ambition."
Stephen Halbrook, Ph.D.(Chapter
9): How Nazi firearms laws disarmed German Jews -- the whole
story.
Jacob Hornberger(Chapter
10): Retelling the tragic, inspiring tale of The White Rose
Society, college students who paid the ultimate price for freedom of mind.
Larry Pratt(Chapter
18): What the Bible says to Christians and Jews about
self-defense and victim disarmament.
The more impoverished the
nation gets, the more society will break down, and then Americans will welcome a militarized police force.
Detroit Appeals To UN For
Humanitarian Assistance
Several groups appealed to the UN on Wednesday to assist in providing affordable water
to the residents of Detroit. In March, the bankrupt city sent 45,000 shutoff notices to
residents with overdue bills. So far, nearly 3,000 have had their water service terminated, and many
more fear they are next. RTs Manila Chan has more details on the circumstances of the plea
for help.
Americans will be caught in the middle between
rioters and the police state
Kit Daniels
Infowars.com
October 16, 2013
By encouraging mass dependency on the welfare state, the
Obama administration is ensuring that nationwide rioting due to a large-scale collapse of the food stamp program
will “justify” an explosive expansion of the police state.
The administration’s goal to dramatically increase food stamp enrollment, officially known as the Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), follows a strategy called pressure from above and below, in which the
government deliberately creates problems in order to offer “solutions” which only expand government powers at the
expense of individual rights.
The government’s “solution” to nationwide rioting due to a crash in the food stamp system will no doubt involve
a federalized police state takeover, perhaps even martial law, with Department of Homeland Security tanks and VIPR
squads roaming America’s streets to supposedly “restore order” out of the chaos while ignoring the Bill of Rights
with impunity.
“The hidden objective will be to expand the power of the bureaucracy and to move the country closer to the
ultimate goal of total government,” wrote G. Edward Griffin in a related essay.
The government’s deliberate push for welfare dependency is obvious considering that the USDA spent vast amounts
of taxpayer money to encourage illegal immigrants to apply for food stamps through television and print ads.
On July 19, 2012, the Daily Caller
reported that the USDA began working with the Mexican government to “increase participation in SNAP.”
Knowing that there was more to the story, Judicial Watch made a Freedom of Information Act request the next day
asking for “any and all records and communications” relating to the USDA/Mexico food stamp partnership.
Nine months later, Judicial Watch received welfare promotional documents including a
Spanish-language flyer targeted to illegal immigrants, telling them that they do not need to “divulge
information” regarding their “immigration status” in order to receive welfare benefits for their children.
The USDA was running Spanish-language television ads promoting the food stamp program to illegal immigrants
as early as 2006, during
the Bush administration.
Once Obama took over, however, welfare enrollment exploded.
“Since President Obama came into office, SNAP participation has increased at 10 times the rate of job creation,”
Sen. John Thune (R-SD) said. “This explosive growth in both the SNAP enrollment and federal cost of the program is
alarming.”
This skyrocketing increase in government dependency is no accident.
By pushing for massive enrollment into SNAP, the Obama administration is making a sizable number of people
dependent on welfare to the point where they will riot if they are denied access to food stamps, which the
government controls at whim.
The government can therefore trigger violent food stamp riots, either intentionally or through incompetence, and
DHS can exploit the ensuing chaos to expand its power while unleashing its stockpile of armored tanks and
two billion
rounds of ammunition onto We the People.
Under a two-prong attack of pressure from above and
pressure from below, the American people will be in serious danger of losing their lives, their rights and what
remains of the republic.
This article was posted: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 at 9:37 am
"As might be expected, the United
Nations is one of the chief promoters of doing away with cash. Two of its
agencies, the World Food Program and the
United Nations Development Program
have expressed support for the idea."
- John F. McManus -
Cashless Society Results
in Less Liberty Trend toward a cashless society brings to
mind
George Orwell’s tyrannical Big Brother
by John F. McManus | Inside JBS | July 10,
2014
A truly important aspect of the use of money
has been lost or forgotten in the age of credit cards, checking accounts, and other methods of conducting commerce.
It is that when one uses unmarked cash for buying and selling, the transaction cannot be traced. The buyer and
seller remain anonymous. They are free from peering eyes and snooping agencies, especially those possessed by
snooping governments.
The reality is that anonymity in the use of money is an important part of freedom. If you
can’t buy or sell what you want without having to reveal who you are or why you are buying or selling, you have
been forced to lose your anonymity. Others who might not have your best interests in mind know what you are
doing.
Today’s worldwide trend is toward creation of a “cashless society” where all
transactions would be accomplished electronically. This would create a record of all monetary transactions that
ought to be no one else’s business. Governments and others with access to such records would then know a great
deal about everyone’s business, a rather scary consequence being promoted in the name of efficiency. Use of
checking accounts, credit and debit cards, etc., should be everyone’s choice, but not the only choice.
As might be expected, the United Nations is one of the chief promoters of doing away with
cash. Two of its agencies, the World Food Program and the United Nations Development Program have expressed support
for the idea. What this amounts to, of course, is an obvious step toward eventual knowledge of everyone’s
previously anonymous conduct of personal affairs. In addition, world planners are backing a program that would have
micro-chips placed in everyone’s body to serve as an ID, but also to function as a credit/debit card.
While being promoted in the names of efficiency and safety, the trend toward a cashless
society brings to mind George Orwell’s tyrannical Big Brother. He would surely champion the idea.
"Doomsday Disneyland" facility used as practice ground for
civil unrest
by Paul Joseph Watson | July 17, 2014
A promotional video touting FEMA’s emergency response
capabilities shows U.S. National Guard troops training to detain unruly African-American citizens in prison camps
before handing them over to police.
The video appears on the official YouTube channel for Guardian Centers, an 830 acre “disaster preparedness and tactical training validation
center” located in Georgia which is routinely used by FEMA and other government agencies to practice emergency
response procedures.
After the 2 minute mark in the clip, the scene cuts to a black woman who is struggling to escape
from the clutches of a uniformed soldier. The area is surrounded by concertina wire and guarded by other
troops.
The clip then shows the woman, along with another African-American, being handed over to local
police before being driven away.
Described
by CNN as the “doomsday Disneyland,” Guardian Centers is a mock city complete with a subway station that
“allow(s) a variety of responders to do a variety of drills in one location.”
The sight of National Guard troops training to detain Americans in prison camps is unlikely to
quell concerns that authorities are preparing for domestic disorder.
Back in 2012,
we reported onFM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations, a U.S. Army manual that
describes how political activists in prison camps will be indoctrinated by specially assigned psychological
operations officers. The document makes numerous references to how government agencies like the DHS, ICE and FEMA
will be involved in the domestic internment of U.S. citizens during “civil support operations.”
A second US
Army Military Police manual that was leaked months later also outlined how military assets would be used
domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.
A report produced in 2008 by the U.S.
Army War College’s Strategic Institute warned that the United States may experience massive civil unrest
in the wake of a series of crises which it termed “strategic shock.”
“Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to
reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security,” stated the report, authored by [Ret.] Lt.
Col. Nathan Freir, adding that the military may be needed to quell “purposeful domestic resistance”.
Rex 84, short for
Readiness Exercise 1984, was established under the pretext of a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossing the
Mexican/US border.
During the Iran-Contra hearings in 1987, however, it was revealed that the program was a secretive
“scenario and drill” developed by the federal government to suspend the Constitution, declare martial law, assign
military commanders to take over state and local governments, and detain large numbers of American citizens
determined by the government to be “national security threats.”
Despite innumerable
indications that the federal government is making preparations for riots, the Department of Homeland
Security denied last
year that it was gearing up for domestic disorder. In 2011, DHS chief Janet Napolitano directed
ICE to prepare for a mass influx of immigrants into the United States, calling for the plan to deal with
the “shelter” and “processing” of large numbers of people.
In the video below, Alex Jones highlights how the
Guardian Centers video is yet another startling indication that authorities in the United States are preparing for
civil unrest as America increasingly begins to resemble a militarized police state.
A former Marine Corps Colonel who was
stationed in Fallujah and trained Iraqi soldiers warns that the Department of Homeland Security is working with law
enforcement to build a “domestic army,” because the federal government is afraid of its own citizens.In this
exclusive in studio interview Ret. Col Martino covers the DHS buildup and solutions our overreaching corrupt
government officials.
Met Police warn people that viewing extremist material in wake of Islamic State's killing
of journalist
may be a terror offense but experts say prosecutions are unlikely Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic...
Shocker: UN Admits Migrant Crisis Plan To Overthrow
West
Published on Aug 13, 2016
Alex Jones breaks down how Goldman Sachs and the UN are using a wave of
Islamic migrants to destroy the sovereignty of Western Nations.
Obama, the Cloward-Piven Strategy,
and the New World
Order “Barack Obama is Destroying Our
Economy on Purpose,” an interview
with author James Simpson.
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
March 10, 2009
On March 9, Brannon Howse of Worldview Radio interviewed author James Simpson. Entitled “Barack
Obama is Destroying Our Economy on Purpose,” Howse’s interview of Simpson concentrated on Columbia University
professors Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven who wrote an article in 1966 for The Nation magazine.
“The article was published on May 2, 1966 and laid out what is now known as the ‘Cloward-Piven Strategy’. The
plan calls for the destruction of capitalism in America by swelling the welfare rolls to the point of collapsing
our economy and then implementing socialism by nationalizing many private institutions,” explains a synopsis on
the Worldview Radio website. “Cloward and Piven studied Saul Alinsky just like Hillary Clinton and President
Obama.”
Alinsky is considered to be the founder of modern community organizing in America. Alinsky’s teachings
influenced Obama early in his career as a community organizer on the far South Side of Chicago. Obama worked for
Gerald Kellman’s Developing Communities Project where he learned and taught Alinsky’s methods for community
organizing. Obama would later work for ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.
According to Sol Stern of the Manhattan Institute, ACORN is a modern successor of the radical 1960’s
“New Left” and holds a “1960’s-bred agenda of anti-capitalism” to be implemented through “undisguised
authoritarian socialism.”
It is a brand of “undisguised authoritarian socialism” supported by the
establishment. As the Union News reported last October, ACORN receives funding from the Robin Hood
Foundation, a charity supported — to the tune $9,859,453 — by the globalist George Soros and his Soros Fund
Charitable Foundation.
“Soros is the visible side of a vast and nasty secret network of private financial interests, controlled by the
leading aristocratic and royal families of Europe, centered in the British House of Windsor,” writes William Engdahl. According to Engdahl, Soros “is part of a tightly knit financial mafia —
‘mafia,’ in the sense of a closed masonic-like fraternity of families pursuing common aims.”
As Antony Sutton documented (Wall Street & the Bolshevik Revolution), the very fount of “authoritarian socialism” was
created and lavishly funded by the bankers. “The involvement of the Rockefellers with their supposed blood
enemies, the Communists, dates back to the Bolshevik Revolution,” notes Gary Allen (None Dare Call it
Conspiracy, chapter 6). “The Federal Reserve-CFR insiders began pushing to open up Communist Russia to U.S.
traders soon after the revolution.”
In addition, the bankers have supported “communism” in the United States. Considering this, it should come as no
surprise the anti-capitalist “Cloward-Piven Strategy” was published by The Nation, a magazine with a
well-documented connection to the CIA. As researcher Bob Feldman notes, The Nation is connected to the National Endowment for Democracy, a
CIA front group involved in overthrowing countries around the world by way of “color revolution.” The CIA has a
history of collaboration with the Ford Foundation (see James Petras: “The Ford Foundation and the CIA: A documented case of philanthropic collaboration with the
Secret Police”).
In 1954, Rowan Gaither of the Ford Foundation told Reese Commission investigator Norman Dodd
that “the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to alter life in the
United States so that we can comfortably be merged with the Soviet Union.”
This merging with the Soviet Union (or more accurately, “authoritarian socialism”) has nothing to do with the
sort of communism taught in school textbooks — a dictatorship of the proletariat and the workers — but rather it is
an authoritarian control system engineered by the bankers and the global elite. “This new and complete Revolution
we contemplate can be defined in a very few words. It is … outright world-socialism, scientifically planned and
directed,” H.G. Wells wrote in The New World Order.
It is a mistake to believe the Cloward-Piven Strategy is scheme cooked up by academic Marxists of “New Left”
bent dedicated to the destruction of capitalism in the name of some sort of vaguely defined humanitarianism. In
fact, “the destruction of capitalism in America by swelling the welfare rolls to the point of collapsing our
economy and then implementing socialism by nationalizing many private institutions” is a meticulous plan on the
part of the global elite to consolidate power and destroy all opposition.
It has nothing to do with liberating the proletariat but rather subjecting them to banker engineered
“world-socialism, scientifically planned and directed” and devised to transform the planet into a banker dominated
high-tech prison gulag.
Obama Launches Border CrisisToDestroy
America Treason: America Destroyed by Design
Orchestrated collapse of America's borders part of globalist plan
to create a North American Union
With daily reports of illegal immigrants crossing into the United States, Infowars decided to head to south
Texas to investigate.We discovered how the U.S. Border Patrol was providing travel accommodations to the illegals
they were supposed to be detaining and putting on trial.
The Globalist Created
'Humanitarian' Immigration Crisis:
Why This Is Happening Now
Published on Jul 3, 2014
(Truthstream Media.com) Behind the endless throngs of desperate Central American
children arriving on the U.S. border and a steady wave of illegal immigrants from Mexico and beyond is a covert
plan for global economic warfare -- those building up the world of globalization are tearing down the
sovereignty and financial strength of the United States and Europe to make way for the coming corporate new
world order.
A generation of sending American jobs offshore under NAFTA, GATT and the WTO, dumping
cheap corn on Mexico thereby destroying millions of farming jobs and unleashing disruptive retailers like
Wal-mart upon the fragile economies of Latin America have created turmoil, uncertainty and rivers of human
migration... and along with it bitter tension and discord over the dynamics of immigration, illegal immigration
and the struggle for a lasting standard of living under the New World Order.
The term "conspiracy theory" was weaponized by the CIA half a century ago. At first it was merely
used to marginalize those who question government narratives. But now that weapon is being loaded and pointed at
our heads. Can a "conspiracy theorist" false flag be far behind? James examines the new FBI document on conspiracy
theorists
as domestic terrorists in this important edition of #PropagandaWatch.
How could there be aWar on Terror and actually say that we're having
awar against terrorism, and leave the
borders wide open? If you were the President of the United States, or I were the President of the United States,
and9/11 really happened the way they
want us to believe it happened, the first thing you would do is shut down the borders, so people couldn't get in
the country to harm you. But they left the borders wide open. Becausethe bankers want the borders open, because they want
aone-world government. They
want a North American Union. They don't want borders
here.9/11 was only a manifestation.
It was done to create afear in the
American public, so that we willobey what they want us to do.
In 1991, the Club
published The First Global Revolution. It analyses the problems ofhumanity, calling
these collectively or in essence the 'problematique'. It notes (laments) that,
historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by enemies in
common: "The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states
have striven to overcome domestic failure and internal contradictions by blaming
external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself -
when things become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad.
Bring the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one, or
else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the traditional enemy,
the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially
those whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so
used to classifying its neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of
traditional adversaries has left governments and public opinion with a great void
to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new
weapons devised."
THE GLOBALISTSMOVE FROM THEIRALQAEDA
CREATION, TO FABRICATING HOMEGROWN DOMESTIC
TERROR
A failed attempt to recruit Aaron Russo resulted in recent
light being shed on the CFR...And The Fake War On Terror!
Several years
ago, after his popular video “Mad As Hell” was released and Aaron Russo began his campaign to become
Governor of Nevada, Russo was noticed by Nicholas Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney. Seeing
Russo’s passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the
elite’s CFR. Watch the full interview here: Reflections and
Warnings.
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And
The Fake War On Terror!
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And The Fake War On
Terrorism!
An independent agency of the United States government responsible for
collecting and coordinating intelligence and counterintelligence activities abroad in the national
interest; headed by the Director of Central Intelligence under the supervision of the President and
National Security Council...There has been considerable criticism of the CIA relating to security
and counterintelligence failures, failures in intelligence analysis, human rights concerns,
external investigations and document releases, influencing public opinion and law enforcement, drug
trafficking, and lying to Congress. In 1987, the former CIA Station Chief in Angola in 1976, John
Stockwell, said the CIA is responsible for tens of thousands of covert actions and destablization
programs since it was created by Congress with the passage of the National Security Act of
1947.At the time, Stockwell estimated that over 6
million people had died in CIA covert actions.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is a governmental agency
belonging to the United StatesDepartment of Justice that serves as both a federal criminal
investigative body and an internal intelligence agency (counterintelligence). Also, it is the
government agency responsible for investigating crimes on Indian reservations in the United States
under the Major Crimes Act. The branch has investigative jurisdiction over violations of more than
200 categories of federal crime. The agency was established in 1908 as the Bureau of Investigation
(BOI). Its name was changed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 1935. The agency
headquarters is the J. Edgar Hoover Building, located in Washington, D.C. The agency has fifty-six
field offices located in major cities throughout the United States, and more than 400 resident
agencies in lesser cities and areas across the nation. More than 50 international offices called
"legal attachés" exist in U.S. embassies and consulates general worldwide.
'Federal Bureau of Investigation organizes almost
all terror plots in the US' ...The report reveals that the FBI regularly infiltrates communities
where they suspect terrorist-minded individuals to be engaging with others. Regardless of their
intentions, agents are sent in to converse within the community, find suspects that could
potentially carry out “lone wolf” attacks and then, more or less, encourage them to do so. By
providing weaponry, funds and a plan, FBI-directed agents will encourage otherwise-unwilling
participants to plot out terrorist attacks, only to bust them before any events fully
materialize.
While the establishment
constantly invokes the contrived terror threat as justification for the announcement that your every activity is
being sent to federal fusion centers, those same fusion centers have been busy defining peaceful assembly,
non-violent protest and criticism of the government as domestic terrorism. According to the government’s own
definition of what constitutes terrorist activity – you are a terrorist. (Article Continued
Below)
The first rule of the drone program
is
that you do not talk about the drone program
Steve Watson
Infowars.com
Feb 25, 2013
In a rare admission, Robert Gibbs, the former White House
Press Secretary under Obama, told reporters Sunday that he was ordered to act as if there was no such thing as an
active US drone program.
“When I went through the process of becoming press secretary, one of the first things they told me was, you’re
not even to acknowledge the drone program,” Gibbs said on MSNBC’s “Up With Chris Hayes” this past weekend.
Gibbs said that he was told “You’re not even to discuss that it exists.”
Noting that the notion was “inherently crazy”, Gibbs said “You’re being asked a question based on reporting of a
program that exists.”
“So you’re the official government spokesperson acting as if the entire program—pay no attention to the man
behind the curtain.” Gibbs, who was Press Secretary between 2009 and 2011, said.
Gibbs stated that he expects the drone program to remain secret for the most part, despite moves in Congress to
force more transparency.
“I have not talked to him about this, so I want to be careful,” Gibbs said, “but I think what the president has
seen is, our denial of the existence of the program when it’s obviously happening undermines people’s confidence
overall in the decisions that their government makes.”
While the program itself remains classified, it is no secret that Obama has vastly expanded the US drone war
since entering office in 2009. Daily drone strikes are raining down on Yemen, Pakistan and Afghanistan, as well as
Somalia.
A recent report released by Washington based think tank, The New America Foundation
revealed that the number of secret US drone strikes in Yemen almost tripled in 2012, compared to 2011.
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, has found that at least 171 civilians, including 35 children, have been
slaughtered in Yemen by secret US drone strikes over the past ten years.
Communications released by WikiLeaks in 2010 revealed that the US and Yemen have repeatedly attempted to cover
up the use of US warplanes to bombard Yemen.
Last week it was announced that despite the fact that drone strikes have killed thousands of innocent civilians
in Yemen and Pakistan, the Pentagon is to reward drone operators with medals.
The DoD is creating a new ribbon, called the Distinguished Warfare Medal that will be awarded for “extra
achievement” related to a military operation. This will encompass sitting at a computer console and pressing a
button to release Hellfire missiles from Predator drones hundreds and thousands of miles away.
The medal will become the fourth-highest ranking combat decoration, placing above the Bronze Star.
Despite the official secrecy, the president has referred to the drone program several times in public, as have
officials such as counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan.
Last year, the New York Times ran a major piece on the program revealing that the White House
has asserted the right to carry out state-sponsored assassination anywhere in the world without having to
provide any evidence or go through any legal process.
The administration merely has to state that the target is
a terrorist and it doesn’t matter whether they are an American citizen or not, as we saw in the case of American-born Anwar al-Awlaki and his son, who were both killed last year.
In December of last year, Obama administration lawyers reaffirmed their backing for state sponsored
assassination, claiming that “U.S. citizens are legitimate military targets” and do not have the right to any
legal protection against being marked for summary execution.
During a CBS 60 Minutes interview in January, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta
revealed that Obama himself personally approves the policy to kill American citizens suspected of terrorism
without trial on a case by case basis.
Perhaps the real reason that the administration wants the details of the programme kept under wraps is that, as
reported by Propublica recently, the programme is potentially much bigger in scope than
anyone had previously thought.
The administration’s figures do not add up, they are chock full of contradictions and discrepancies, and there
can be little doubt that there have been many many more civilian deaths as a result of drone attacks than have been
publicly acknowledged.
Akram, who noted that US drone strikes had killed more than 1,000 civilians in Pakistan, also said “We find the
use of drones to be totally counterproductive in terms of succeeding in the ‘war against terror’. It leads to
greater levels of terror rather than reducing them.
Many also contend that the attacks infringe the national sovereignty of Pakistan and constitute an act of
war.
In 2010,
a report by Washington think tank The New America Foundation found that 32% of the more than
1,200 people killed since 2004 in Pakistan, or around 1 in 3, were innocent bystanders rather than dangerous
terrorists.
—————————————————————-
Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of
Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from
Nottingham Trent University.
This article was posted: Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:00 am
Learn how top United Nations proponents exploit small
arms, the environment, and justice to pressure Capitol Hill into quietly surrendering America's heritage of
freedom. Should these UN plans remain unopposed, the consequences are ultimately grim. There is, however, a way to
avert this danger. (2001, 60 min., DVD)
REACH OUT TO OTHERS
[Help Educate Family And Friends With This Page And The Links Below]