The debate over the dangers of fluoride has been ongoing for more than six decades.
Study after study shows that fluoride is a dangerous, toxic poison that is ineffective at preventing dental
decay.Yet, even while it's being dumped every day into U.S. municipal water systems, health
officials that should know better are flooding the media with lies and propaganda singing the praises of fluoridation.The video below
exposes the zealous fluoridation promoters, their hidden agendas, and the harms that have come to people who have
no choice in whether fluoride is added to their drinking water
Dr. Paul Connett on the Historic
Trial
That Could End Water Fluoridation
The Conscious Resistance
Journalist Derrick Broze interview Dr. Paul Connett of the Fluoride Action Network regarding the
upcoming trial between FAN and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This trial could spell the end of the
practice of water fluoridation.
Support our work AND get a free ounce of Kratom to help with fatigue, stress, addiction, and pain:
www.broze.freeounceofkratom.com
Please help us advance truth, healing, community building, and empowering the people to wake up and
build a better world: https://www.Patreon.com/DerrickBroze
2022
Fluoride Action Update - Interview with Paul Connett -
First published at 18:06 UTC on June 21st,
2022.
In this interview, Paul Connett, Ph.D., cofounder
of and scientific adviser for the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), provides an annual status update for 2022. As
long-time readers of this newsletter will know, we've supported and promoted FAN for over a
decade.
The National Institute of Environmental Health
Science-funded Bashash study, published in 2017, showed fluoridated water lowers IQ in children. Each 1-milligram
per liter increase in fluoride in a pregnant woman’s urine is associated with a four- to five-point drop in her
child’s IQ.
Canadian researchers found bottle-fed children
who lived in a fluoridated community had, on average, nine points lower IQ compared to those who were bottle-fed in
a non-fluoridated community.
The science showing water fluoridation is hurting
our children is significant, and keeps growing. More than 20 studies published since 2017 have confirmed fluoride
lowers IQ.
Water fluoridation became public health policy in
1950 when the U.S. Public Service endorsed the practice before any of the trials started in 1945 had been
completed. For many decades since then, little effort has been made to research harmful effects.
The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) has sued the
Environmental Protection Agency in an effort to end the water fluoridation policy. A win will make it easier to
overturn water fluoridation policies on the state level, even if the EPA drags its heels. We’re currently waiting
for a final report from the National Toxicology Program. Once the report is released, FAN can go back to court and
hopefully win the case.
The debate over the dangers of fluoride has been
ongoing for more than six decades. Study after study shows that fluoride is a dangerous, toxic poison that is
ineffective at preventing dental decay.
Yet, even while it's being dumped every day into U.S. municipal water systems, health officials that
should know better are flooding the media with lies and propaganda singing the praises of
fluoridation.
The video above exposes the zealous fluoridation promoters, their hidden agendas, and the harms that have
come to people who have no choice in whether fluoride is added to their drinking water.
Top 10 Health Achievements of the 20th Century?
The following statement is often spouted as "proof" that water fluoridation is a panacea for oral health,
but really it is an overused piece of propaganda:
"The CDC has stated that fluoridation is one of the top 10 public health achievements of the 20th
century."
The information behind this quote comes from 1999 issue of Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR),
which includes fluoridation in a list of "Ten Great Public Health Achievements―1900-1999."
The contents of MMWR are published entirely by staff of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention's (CDC); it is often called "the voice of CDC." None of the information it contains has been
independently peer-reviewed, and MMWR does not publish any article or research that runs counter to CDC policy
or positions.
The CDC is unabashed in their support for water fluoridation, even though their support is at odds with a
now very large body of scientific evidence detailing the profound and detrimental impact of fluoride on
multiple biological functions.
And in the case of the statement above, which is often used as authoritative "proof" that fluoride is to
drinking water what gold is to the economy, it comes from material written by a dentist who had not published
any papers on fluoride before, and an economist. Neither of them had any credentials in toxicology, which is
what is required to accurately assess the dangers of this poison. It's not surprising, though, considering the
CDC's water fluoridation stance has been controlled by dentists for over 35 years …
CDC's Support for Water Fluoridation Based on Flimsy, Insufficient Data
Last April, the CDC responded to an FOIA request asking for the names and job descriptions of all parties at
the CDC who have had input into the agency's decision to support water fluoridation.
i
As it turns out, ever since the mid-1970s, when fluoridation activities transferred from the Health
Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) to the CDC under the directorship of William Bock, dental health
professionals have been the sole bodyof experts directing the agency's stance on
water fluoridation. Glaringly absent from this list are ... well, any health expert outside the
Oral Health Division. Apparently, no toxicologist has ever been directly involved in the decision process, nor
any minority health professionals, or experts on internal medicine or diabetes, for example.
This flies in the face of what the agency claims, and what water-, health- and political leaders have
believed about the way the CDC operates. Without these additional experts from other fields, can we reasonably
believe that the agency has properly assessed the research on whole-body harm from fluoridation?
While the CDC officially claims that "extensive research conducted over the past 60 years has shown that
fluoridation of public water supplies is safe and effective for all community residents,"
ii this claim appears to have the flimsiest of foundations.
According to a 2006 report from the National Research Council,
iii extensive amounts of research are inconclusive, or still missing and need to be conducted to
evaluate the whole-body impact of fluoride …
Not only that, but their scientific review also identified research suggesting a variety of harmful effects,
from skeletal fluorosis, bone fractures, and, potentially, even cancer. With that in mind, how can the CDC
claim that "extensive research" has concluded water fluoridation is safe for ALL community residents, without
differentiation between infants and adults, the sick or the healthy? Not to mention, how can the CDC accurately
claim that water fluoridation is one of the top public health achievements of the last century?
Water Fluoridation Blamed on Communist Conspiracy
The other widely used propaganda piece noted in the video is from Stanley Kubrick's 1964 film Dr.
Strangelove. In the film, General Jack D. Ripper tries to stop a Communist conspiracy to harm Americans
with fluoridated water, and at one point states:
"Do you realize that fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous Communist plot we
have ever had to face?"
Of course, water fluoridation was not a communist plot -- it was started by the U.S. Public Health Service.
But the film pokes fun at the John Birch Society, an extreme right wing group that happened to be
anti-fluoridation. So, of course, anyone at the time who dared speak out against fluoridation was also ruled to
be a fanatic, a radical or just a lunatic – even when they could point to legitimate science to back up their
claims. This stigma has, unfortunately, stuck through the decades, although now the walls are beginning to
crumble.
Fluoride Harms Go "Mainstream"
Earlier this year, the New Hampshire House of Representatives voted 253-23 in favor of
mandating infant fluoride warnings on all water bills in fluoridated communities (the bill will now go
to the Senate). According to the text of the bill, the warning would read, in part:
"According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, if your child under the age of 6
months is exclusively consuming infant formula reconstituted with fluoridated water, there may be an
increased chance of dental fluorosis."
But dental fluorosis is not "just cosmetic." It can also be an indication that other tissues, such as your
bones and internal organs, including your brain, have been overexposed to fluoride as well. There are more than
100 published studies illustrating fluoride's harm to the brain,
iv plus 25 published studies directly linking fluoride exposure to reduced IQ in children!
Fluoride is a toxic agent that is biologically active in the human body where it
accumulates in sensitive tissues over time, wreaks havoc with enzymes and produces a number of serious
adverse health effects—including neurological and endocrine dysfunctions.
Adding insult to injury, even promoters of fluoridation now admit that fluoride's predominant action is on
the surface of the tooth (although even this is now questionable) and not from inside the body – so why are so
many Americans still being forced to swallow it? Swallowing fluoride provides little or no
benefit to your teeth!
Even China does NOT allow water fluoridation because it's too toxic and causes damage, according to their
studies. Instead, the waste product from their phosphate fertilizer industry is shipped to the United States,
where we add it to our water supply! This is a very important point: the fluoride added to your water is
NOT even pharmaceutical grade.
It's a toxic industrial waste product, which is also contaminated with lead, arsenic, radionucleotides,
aluminum and other industrial contaminants. The story gets even more convoluted, as now declassified files of
the Manhattan Project and the Atomic Energy Commission show that the original motivation for promoting fluoride
and water fluoridation in the United States was to
protect the bomb-, aluminum-, and other fluoride-polluting industries from liability. In the early days
some of the sodium fluoride used to fluoridate water supplies in the U.S. came from Alcoa.
A couple of years later, they switched to the even more hazardous waste product hydrofluorosilicic acid from
the phosphate fertilizer industry. But none of the studies on fluoride actually used the far more toxic and
contaminated hydrofluorosilicic acid that is presently added to the water supply. Rather, they use
pharmaceutical-grade fluoride, which while harmful, is not quite as bad as what's being used for water
fluoridation. So, the health hazards are likely FAR worse than any study has so far discerned.
Unethical, Ineffective, Toxic and Compulsory: Are You Angry Yet?
I recently
interviewed Jeff Green, who has been an activist in the movement to eliminate toxic fluoride from your
water supply for the past 15 years. One element he addressed is that many of us who are first exposed to issues
such as this enter into a world of anger at injustice, where we see the problem so passionately and so clearly
that we carry the burden of truth and are in a hurry to tell others to set it right, viewing anyone who does
not immediately agree with our view as opposition that must be overwhelmed with facts and a list of
"shoulds."
In this state we look angry, and are easily characterized as a zealot, probably because we are. Asking
someone without our passion to join us may not be that inviting.
Should we expect that this would be any different when speaking to authorities and asking them to act? If
you are able to suspend your anger at injustice, able to switch your focus from stating the problem to
addressing solutions, there are avenues available. If you would like to elevate your discussions from the
argumentative "he said, she said" to letting the facts declare themselves, and you are in a position of
authority from which you can champion the performance of due diligence, contact us for access to guidance and
further information.
If you are capable of being an advocate of safe drinking water and would like to assist in identifying a
champion for due diligence in your community, contact us for approaches and further information.
What You Can Do TODAY!
The Fluoride
Action Network has a game plan to END water fluoridation in both Canada and the United States. Our
fluoride initiative will primarily focus on Canada since 60 percent of Canada is already non-fluoridated. If
we can get Calgary and the rest of Canada to stop fluoridating their water, we believe the U.S. will be
forced to follow.
Please, join the anti-fluoride movement in Canada and United States by contacting the representative for
your area below.
Contact Information for Canadian Communities:
If you live in Ontario, Canada, please join the ongoing effort by contacting Diane
Sprules at diane.sprules@cogeco.ca.
The point-of-contact for Toronto, Canada is Aliss Terpstra. You may email her at
aliss@nutrimom.ca.
Contact Information for American Communities:
We're also going to address three U.S. communities: New York City, Austin, and San Diego:
New York City, NY: The anti-fluoridation movement has a great champion in New
York City councilor Peter Vallone, Jr. who introduced legislation "prohibiting the addition of fluoride to
the water supply." A victory there could signal the beginning of the end of fluoridation in the U.S.
If you live in the New York area I implore you to participate in this effort as your contribution
could have a MAJOR difference. Remember that one person can make a difference.
The point person for this area is Carol Kopf, at the New York Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation
(NYSCOF). Email her at NYSCOF@aol.com. Please
contact her if you're interested in helping with this effort.
Developmental neurotoxicants are chemicals
that effect the way your brain develops in its ability to process, store and retrieve information. The
pharmacratical dictatorship has sunk its fangs of control into every facet of human existence making it nearly
impossible to escape the toxic stream of products being produced by the new world orders mental hygienists. Dumbing
down the population is a compartmentalized industry which exploits human necessity in order to expand its fear of
influence. Turning food and water into weaponized mental poisons the modern day behavioral sterilization program
marches forward.
The {EPA} Environmental Pollution Agency have established a list of chemicals that are known to cause learning
disabilities and central nervous system disorders, The Mundy Database refers to these chemicals as developmental
neurotoxins. This list contains well over a double dozen different poisons that will lower your IQ level while
quenching your thirst and brightening your teeth. Taking a look at the EPA's list you start to realize most of
these chemical are in foods and beverages we consume on a daily basis. In fact it would be nearly impossible not to
consume at least one of these brain-cell-killing chemicals which have saturated consumer goods and permeated every
aspect of human hygiene creating an empire of imbeciles who pay to be poisoned.
There have now been over 100
studies involving animals which show that fluoride damages the brain, stresses Connett, which is a particular
concern for newborn babies who are susceptible to fluoride build up because of their weak
blood-brain barrier. Connett cites numerous studies which prove a link between moderate exposure to fluoride
and lowered IQ in children.
Bombshell: Government Admits Fluoride
Hurting Children
A significant milestone in the fight against
fluoride emerged quietly and without major notice from the mainstream news last week. After decades of ignoring
the research about the dangers and hailing water fluoridation as one of the 10 greatest health achievements of
the 20th Century (CDC), the government is calling for a reduction in the amount of fluoride it adds to public
water supplies, citing its negative effect on teeth (dental fluorosis). For the first time since 1962, the
standard for fluoride will be lowered from 1.2 to 0.7 milligrams per liter.
Because fluoride from water builds up over time in the human body, this reduction will not eliminate the
dangers of fluoride-- which include risk of bone cancer, bone fractures, thyroid disorder, brain inflammation,
lowered IQ and mental functions, sterility or reduced fertility and more. However, it is a good sign that the
powers-that-be are losing ground on the fluoride debate. Further, the reduction of fluoridation is proof that
the warnings from activists, critics and health professionals have been heard after all.
Abby Martin takes with a look at the 50 year long practice of water fluoridation in America,
outlining adverse
health effects and breaking the myth that it helps prevent tooth decay.
Fluoride 101 With Activist Ashley
Jessica
Fluoride-based pesticide chemicals such as cryolite (sodium hexafluoroaluminate) are commonly
used on non-organic food crops because they are highly effective at both killing pests and protecting crops against
pest damage. But these same chemicals tend to persist in, and on, produce, where unsuspecting consumers regularly
consume them with their everyday meals. According to Green, about one-third of the average person's fluoride
exposure comes from non-organic food grown using fluoride chemicals.
"Cryolite is actually sodium aluminum fluoride ... this sodium aluminum fluoride is especially effective at killing
bugs," says Green. "It's also very sticky, so when they spray it, it's more likely to stick on your produce, unless
you're ... really working at trying to get it off of it." http://www.infowars.com/some-non-orga...
Fluoride 101 With Activist Ashley
Jessica
Fluoride-based pesticide chemicals such as cryolite (sodium hexafluoroaluminate) are commonly
used on non-organic food crops because they are highly effective at both killing pests and protecting crops against
pest damage. But these same chemicals tend to persist in, and on, produce, where unsuspecting consumers regularly
consume them with their everyday meals. According to Green, about one-third of the average person's fluoride
exposure comes from non-organic food grown using fluoride chemicals.
"Cryolite is actually sodium aluminum fluoride ... this sodium aluminum fluoride is especially effective at killing
bugs," says Green. "It's also very sticky, so when they spray it, it's more likely to stick on your produce, unless
you're ... really working at trying to get it off of it." http://www.infowars.com/some-non-orga...
We know that over 20 studies, many of which come from
prestigious organizations like Harvard and are published in
federal government journals, have told us how sodium fluoride is crushing our IQ. We know that a major head at
the National Cancer Institute revealed decades ago that fluoride was causing ‘cancer waves’ in the United
States.
So, remind me again, why are we still drinking fluoride in our ‘clean’ tap water around the entire world?
As it turns out, it’s because Harvard and federal government journalists must all be wackjob conspiracy
theorists! The peer-reviewed research warning that fluoride can cause permanent damage to unborn babies by
affecting their neurological development is all a big conspiracy theory to the mainstream media. The sodium
fluoride that is literally assaulting the brain in mega-high doses of 5,000 PPM in
‘prescription fluoride’ toothpaste being dished out by dentists who say their childhood patients are ‘deficient’ in
the IQ-destroyer is perfectly safe in their eyes.
When analyzing the Harvard research, published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, a
component of the United States National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, we find quite a few concerning
details. The study makes it explicitly clear how damaging sodium fluoride can be, with writers explaining:
“The children in high fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ than those who lived in
low fluoride areas.”
The EPA had similar statements, demonstrating how fluoride displays
”evidence of developmental neurotoxicity” and can damage unborn babies. We read:
”Fluoride readily crosses the placenta. Fluoride exposure to the developing brain, which is much more
susceptible to injury caused by toxicants than is the mature brain, may possibly lead to damage of a
permanent nature.”
Let’s go even further back to the research of Dr. Dean Burke, head scientist at the National Cancer Institute and author of over 250 scientific articles. Back in
1977, the decorated scientist spoke out against fluoride and brought it to the attention of the National Cancer
Institute. At that time, Burke found that sodium fluoride was fueling the development of cancer cells and tumor
growth — at the average level of 1 PPM. He estimated that around 10,000 had died from the fluoride-induced cancer
from that level.
As I detail in the video below, now we see levels as high as 5,000 PPM in toothpaste, 500,000% higher than the
water fluoridation levels Burke was examining:
Popular Toothpaste Contains
5,000x Fluoride Linked to Cancer, Lower IQ
[vid]
I guess no one told the media that even the United
States government called
for lower fluoride levels after a mountain of research accumulated regarding these links. They must be
conspiracy theorists too.
The fact is that the fluoride debate hits a brick wall thanks to the rhetoric the mainstream media and laughable
‘skeptics’ use by throwing around terms like ‘conspiracy theory’ to discredit any real debate. In fact, it’s
actually working against them. Right now we have so many conscious citizens realizing that they don’t want to
consume the tainted tap that it’s really considered outlandish in many areas to drink from the tap without at least
a fluoride-removing filter of some kind. A lot has changed as more information comes out.
We’ve seen a push for fluoride bans around the world, from Australia’s Queensland to
regions within Florida. And the movement has been heating up.
But still, how could we possibly allow this fluoridation to go on for as long as it has? Even if there was only
some research indicating an issue, isn’t it enough to begin withdrawing it from the water — or at least enough to
conduct more independent research? I think any reasonable person would agree the answer is yes.
It’s time to accelerate this issue from a tired debate of ‘conspiracy’ theory name-calling to a topical issue we
can generate a victory for. We’ve done it for GMOs; we’ve done it for high-fructose corn syrup; we’ve done it for
BPA. It’s time to blast this information into the stratosphere and demand action.
The Most Dangerous Halloween Treat For Kids
Revealed
[vid]
Published on Oct 30, 2014
When Halloween rolls around there are
countless articles talking about the additives, artificial sweeteners and dyes that are in children's candy. These
substances can have short term and long term effects on their health. But the rest of the year children and adults
are bombarded with a chemical additive in their water under the guise that it is helping their teeth. The poison is
sodium fluoride and it is destroying the physical and mental health to all who drink it. Rob Dew is joined with
anti-fluoridation activist Linda Greene from http://fluoridealert.org to talk about recent victories,how to get fluoride out
of your community, and free resources that are available for you to educate yourself and others.
Don't forget to tweet fluoride truth on #SweetHalloween
Attorney Michael Connett summarizes 10 basic facts about fluoride that should be considered
in any discussion about whether to fluoridate water. To download the flyer that accompanies this video, visit:
http://www.fluoridealert.org/uploads/.... To watch Michael debate two advocates of
fluoridation, see: http://www.wpsu.org/conversationslive....
Following years of research and the request of listeners worldwide, Alex teamed up with Dr. Edward
Group to find a solution to addressing the accumulation of toxic fluoride substances within the body. Ultimately,
this led to countless hours of research on behalf of Dr. Edward Group, who began in late 2012 to find the highest
quality ingredients when it came to supporting the body in the removal of toxic halogens.
Here's what Dr. Edward Group had to say in regards to his 20-year-long specialized detoxification
methods research:
"After years of research I am excited to announce one of the greatest product breakthroughs of all
time, Fluoride Shield™. The creation of this product came from the request of Anthony Gucciardi in late 2012, when
he asked me if there was a product that could help people cleanse toxic fluoride from their system and help
rejuvenate the pineal gland from calcification. I thought this was a great idea and started working on a product
that has never been created before with such a unique blend of ingredients for the purpose of shielding fluoride
from the body.
This led to countless days and hours spent creating the most powerful vegetable glycerin based
herbal fluoride cleanser on the planet. My research started by looking into the past and studying the damaging
effects of fluoride in the body, dating back to the early 1900's. First, I had to select the right ingredients.
Then, I put to use a revolutionary, multi-step processing technique to extract the most powerful essence of the
herbs and overall ingredients into a final blend which is harmonious and beneficial to the body. The ingredients
chosen had to be either certified organic or grown under organic conditions, in balance with nature to obtain
superior quality and potency.
The ingredients then had to be carefully dried with low heat and humidity, so that the ingredients
could be processed in the liquid phase. Then, the ingredients proceed through a cold processing technique that
preserves the plant's components, including enzyme activity, vitamins and co-factors and fragile essential oil
complexes. We also capture heavy 'mole weight' essential aromatic components and sterols, oleoresins, (lipids and
waxes), resinoids, high density polysaccharides and other constituents, all in their ratio-intact state.
EXTRA
Council member
Jolanda Jones recently spoke to concerned residents of Houston's Chasewood neighborhood, who were exposed to
many years' worth of radioactive water from a city water well that consistently tested higher than the EPA legal
limit for alpha radiation.
However, because water wells in other neighborhoods in Houston are served by wells
with less radiation, Houston’s water supply as an entire “system” stayed in compliance with federal regulations. As
a result, Chasewood residents were never warned of what Jones calls a real danger to their neighborhood.
The council member noted that one street there has just 21 homes and 14 cases of
cancer.
It is why Jones is calling on the city’s mayor and other leaders in public works to
create a formal policy that goes farther than what she calls “lax EPA requirements” on notification.
Jones suggests if a well ever tests higher than the federal legal limit for radiation, citizens in the surrounding
neighborhood would be notified without delay.
The Chasewood community is a largely minority community.
Jones took to authoring newspaper articles in community newspapers such as the
African-American News & Issues publication, which describes itself as “Texas’s Widest Circulated and Read
Newspaper with a Black Perspective,” calling attention to what she felt were injustices and public-health threats
the citizens of Chasewood were exposed to.
More recently, Jones authored a new article in the same publication entitled, “There
are more potential Chasewood’s.” She included information about many of the hot-spot wells identified by the
USGS report, and urged citizens to “make your voices heard” or risk having nothing done by city leaders, who she
feels have not been eager to act.
The data is scary: Nearly half of water faucets sampled
across the United States tested positive for the bacteria that causes Legionnaires’ disease.
While the study was small — researchers only sampled 67 public and private water sources such as kitchen sinks
and drinking fountains – it’s the first one to chart the presence of the potentially deadly bacteria in water
taps.
According to the EPA, the organization that conducted the research, 32 taps contained the bacteria, and 11 of
those contained it in multiple samples.
Read more
[vid]
This article was posted: Saturday, February 22, 2014 at 11:10 am
The Georgia Guidestones is a large granite monument in Elbert
County, Georgia. It has been referred to as an American Stonehenge. The person or group that paid for its
construction is a mystery. Inscribed on its stones are ten commandments, written in twelve languages, for what
it describes as an Age of Reason. Many believe it is an agenda for the New World Order.
The first commandment is: "Maintain humanity under 500 million in perpetual balance with nature." Since the world
population now stands at over seven billion, that means the commandment calls for the elimination of 93% of the
world's population.
THE CULLING ALREADY HAS BEGUN
The Great Culling of the human race already has begun. It is being done through chemicals added to our drinking
water, food, medicines, and the air we breathe -- chemicals that have the known effect of reducing fertility and
shortening lifespan. This message can no longer be dismissed as conspiracy theory. The facts are in plain view.
This documentary is the first of a three-part series. It shows how additives to our drinking water, such as
fluoride, supposedly to combat tooth decay, in reality are covert doses of death. It also shows how you can protect
yourself and your family.
It is my intention to give you clips from documents, many
from the United Nations that prove there is a plan to depopulate this planet. I will also provide quotes from
various people and organizations that further show this agenda is afoot. I pray the guidance of the Lord God
Almighty will be with me in this pursuit to warn others of this dark plot against humanity.
Everything written in this paper is easily verifiable. It may take some time and effort, but I took great pains
to make this paper as accurate as I possibly could.
The depopulation agenda is based on nature worship, or Gaia worship. In Genesis, God clearly told Adam and Eve,
and then Noah and his family to go forth and multiply to fill the earth. Nowhere in the Bible does God rescind that
clearly spoken commandment. Therefore man is attempting to supercede the command of the Lord God in heaven: The
Creator! I ask you, who knows more about the state of the earth, the created, or the Creator?
The basis for the depopulation agenda is a standard all elitist’s hold dear. This standard is called:
The Hegelian Dialectic:
Problem – Reaction-Solution
Create the Problem Cause a Reaction Offer a Solution
You will see exactly how they have created the problem; caused a reaction so widespread it is really quite
impressive how successful they have been; and offered a solution: A deadly solution.
I ask that you please make an attempt to distribute this paper everywhere you possibly can. The time grows short
and so many are going to be caught unawares. By getting the word out, you may be able to prevent someone from
needless pain and suffering.
Aldous Huxley
William Benton, Assistant U.S. Secretary of State at UNESCO 1946: (UNESCO is the United Nations
Education, Science and Cultural Organization)
“As long as a child breathes the poisoned air of nationalism, education in world-mindedness can produce only
precarious results. As we have pointed out, it is frequently the family that infects the child with extreme
nationalism. The schools therefore use the means described earlier to combat family attitudes that favor jingoism
(nationalism)…we shall presently recognize in nationalism the major obstacle to development of world mindedness. We
are at the beginning of a long process of breaking down the walls of national sovereignty. UNESCO must be the
pioneer.” (Emphasis mine throughout)
Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, 1991:
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global
warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill (this is absolute proof that man made global
warming is a fabrication)…. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for
causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior
that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
Mikhail Gorbachev:
“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control
population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there
aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”
Aldous Huxley, Brave New World 1946:
“There is, of course, no reason why the new totalitarians should resemble the old. Government by clubs and
firing squads, by artificial famine, mass imprisonment and mass deportation, is not merely inhumane (nobody cares
much about that nowadays); it is demonstrably inefficient and in an age of advanced technology, inefficiency is the
sin against the Holy Ghost.”
Aldous Huxley, Lecture named Population Explosion 1959:
“…Let us ask ourselves what the practical alternatives are as we confront this problem of population growth.
One alternative is to do nothing in particular about it and just let things go on as they are…The question is: Are
we going to restore the balance in the natural way, which is a brutal and entirely anti-human way, or are we going
to restore it in some intelligent, rational, and humane way…Try to increase production as much as possible and at
the same time try to re-establish the balance between the birth rate by means less gruesome than those which are
used by nature – by intelligent and human methods?…There are colossal difficulties in the way of implementing any
large-scale policy of limitation of population; whereas death control is extremely easy under modern circumstances,
birth control is extremely difficult. The reason is very simple: death control – the control, for example, of
infectious diseases – can be accomplished by a handful of experts and quite a small labour force of unskilled
persons and requires a very small capital expenditure.”
Barry Commoner, Making Peace with the Planet:
“There have been ‘triage’ proposals that would condemn whole nations to death through some species of global
‘benign neglect’. There have been schemes for coercing people to curtail their fertility, by physical and legal
means that are ominously left unspecified. Now we are told that we must curtail rather than extend our efforts to
feed the hungry peoples of the world. Where will it end?” Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 28, 1997,
Testimony before Congressional Committee: “There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been
trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least.
Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain
types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races;
and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are
engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes
remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at
work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have
to intensify our efforts, and that’s why this is so important.”
Jacques Cousteau
Jacques Cousteau UNESCO Courier 1991:
“In order to save the planet it would be necessary to kill 350,000 people per day.”
Jacques Cousteau, Population: Opposing Viewpoints:
“If we want our precarious endeavor to succeed, we must convince all human beings to participate in our
adventure, and we must urgently find solutions to curb the population explosion that has a direct influence on the
impoverishment of the less-favoured communities. Otherwise, generalized resentment will beget hatred, and the
ugliest genocide imaginable, involving billions of people, will become unavoidable.”
“Uncontrolled population growth and poverty must not be fought from inside, from Europe, from North America,
or any nation or group of nations; it must be attacked from the outside – by international agencies helped in the
formidable job by competent and totally non-governmental organizations.”
Bertrand Russell, The Impact Of Science On Society 1953
“I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing… War…
has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a
Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without
making the world too full… The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded
people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s… There are three ways of securing a society that
shall be stable as regards population. The first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really
destructive wars, and the third that of general misery except for a powerful minority…”
Henry Kissinger, 1978:
“U.S. policy toward the third world should be one of depopulation”
David Rockefeller, 2000:
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will
accept the New World Order.”
David Rockefeller: Memoirs 2002 Founder of the CFR:
“We wield over American political and economical institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret
cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as
‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political
structure, one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
David Rockefeller, Co-founder of the Trilateral Commission:
David Rockefeller
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time
Magazine & other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of
discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plans for the world if we had
been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now much more sophisticated
and prepared to march towards a world government. Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American Case Officer for the State
Department’s Office of Population Affairs (OPA) (now the US State Dept. Office of Population Affairs, est. by Henry
Kissinger in 1975): “There is a single theme behind all our work -we must reduce population levels,” said Thomas
Ferguson, the Latin American case officer for the State Department’s Office of Population Affairs (OPA). “Either
they [governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El
Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it
requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it. “The professionals,” said Ferguson, “aren’t
interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons. That sounds nice. We look at resources and
environmental constraints. We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population
-or else we will have trouble.
“So steps are taken. El Salvador is an example where our failure to lower population by simple means has
created the basis for a national security crisis. The government of El Salvador failed to use our programs to lower
their population. Now they get a civil war because of it…. There will be dislocation and food shortages. They still
have too many people there.” (1981)
Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 28, 1997; Testimony before Congressional
Committee:
“And advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological
warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.”
Sir Julian Huxley, UNESCO: its Purpose and its Philosophy:
“Political unification in some sort of world government will be required… Even though… any radical eugenic
policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see
that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at
stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.” In the early 1950′s, former Communist
Joseph Z. Kornfeder expressed the opinion that UNESCO was comparable to a Communist Party agitation and propaganda
department. He stated that such a party apparatus ‘handles the strategy and method of getting at the public mind,
young and old.’ Huxley would lard the agency with a motley collection of Communists and fellow travelers.
President Richard Nixon believed abortion was necessary as a form of eugenics to prevent interracial
breeding
Theodore Roosevelt to Charles B. Davenport, January 3, 1913, Charles B. Davenport Papers,
Department of Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.:
“I wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented entirely from breeding; and when the evil nature
of these people is sufficiently flagrant, this should be done. Criminals should be sterilized and feebleminded
persons forbidden to leave offspring behind them…The emphasis should be laid on getting desirable people to
breed…”
Theodore Roosevelt
Theodore Roosevelt:
“Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind…. Any group of farmers, who permitted
their best stock not to breed, and let all the increase come from the worst stock, would be treated as fit inmates
for an asylum…. Some day we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty of the good citizens of the
right type is to leave his or her blood behind him in the world; and that we have no business to permit the
perpetuation of citizens of the wrong type. The great problem of civilization is to secure a relative increase of
the valuable as compared with the less valuable or noxious elements in the population… The problem cannot be met
unless we give full consideration to the immense influence of heredity…” “I wish very much that the wrong people
could be prevented entirely from breeding; and when the evil nature of these people is sufficiently flagrant, this
should be done. Criminals should be sterilized and feebleminded persons forbidden to leave offspring behind them…
The emphasis should be laid on getting desirable people to breed…”
By Carl Teichrib:
“The Georgia Guidestones, a massive granite edifice planted in the Georgia
countryside, contains a list of ten new commandments for Earth’s citizens. The first commandment, and the one which
concerns this article, simply states; “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with
nature.”
Robert Walker, former chair of PepsiCo and Proctor &
Gamble on water:
Water is a gift of nature. Its delivery is not. It must be priced to insure it is used sustainably.
Ted Turner makes the radical statement that, “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from
present levels, would be ideal,”
Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood, funded by the
Rockefellers) said in her proposed “The American Baby Code”, intended to become law:
“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
This is the woman (Margaret Sanger) whom Hillary Clinton publicly declared she looked up to, during the 2008
presidential debates.
Here is a short list of some advocates of eugenics; Alexander Graham Bell, George Bernard Shaw H. G. Wells,
Sidney Webb, William Beveridge, John Maynard Keynes, Margaret Sanger, Marie Stopes, Woodrow Wilson, Theodore
Roosevelt, Emile Zola, George Bernard Shaw, John Maynard Keynes, John Harvey Kellogg, Winston Churchill, Linus
Pauling, Sidney Webb, Sir Francis Galton, Charles B. Davenport Futurist Barbara Marx Hubbard (who wanted to create
a Dept. of Peace):
“Out of the full spectrum of human personality, one-fourth is electing to transcend…One-fourth is ready to
so choose, given the example of one other…One-fourth is resistant to election. They are unattracted by life ever
evolving. One-fourth is destructive. They are born angry with God…They are defective seeds…There have always been
defective seeds. In the past they were permitted to die a ‘natural death’…we, the elders, have been patiently
waiting until the very last moment before the quantum transformation, to take action to cut out this corrupted and
corrupting element in the body of humanity. It is like watching a cancer grow…Now, as we approach the quantum shift
from creature-human to co-creative human—the human who is an inheritor of god-like powers—the destructive
one-fourth must be eliminated from the social body. We have no choice, dearly beloveds. Fortunately you, dearly
beloveds, are not responsible for this act. We are. We are in charge of God’s selection process for planet Earth.
He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death. We come to bring death to those who are unable
to know God…the riders of the pale horse are about to pass among you. Grim reapers, they will separate the wheat
from the chaff. This is the most painful period in the history of humanity…”
Henry Kissinger
Alexander Haig is quoted referring to the US State Department Office of Population Affairs, which was
established by Henry Kissinger in 1975. The title has since been changed to The Bureau of Oceans, International
Environmental and Scientific Affairs:
“Accordingly, the Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental and Scientific Affairs has consistently blocked
industrialization policies in the Third World, denying developing nation’s access to nuclear energy technology–the
policies that would enable countries to sustain a growing population. According to State Department sources, and
Ferguson himself, Alexander Haig is a “firm believer” in population control.
Although the above stated quotes should be sufficient to prove that the elitists in power have definite intent
to depopulate this planet to what they deem to be a sustainable level. Some will argue these are only opinions and
are of no real consequence. I will now move on to providing bits of documentation showing this is a plan that has a
worldwide scope of influence.
Most of these documents are at least 10 years old, some older. That however, does not take away from the
seriousness of the content. Do not think them invalid due to their age. It takes time to foment plans on such a
grand scale. But, if you are honest with yourself you can see glimpses of these things happening today.
I am going to cover some issues stemming from the UN Treaty on Biological Diversity (Agenda 21), which Bill
Clinton signed into law in 1993 before it was sent to the U.S. Senate for ratification.
EPA Internal Working Document Ecosystem Management:
“The executive branch should direct federal agencies to evaluate national policies…. in light of
international policies and obligations, and to amend national policies to achieve international
objectives.”
“In other words, our federal bureaucrats are writing U.S. law, independent of Congress who has
Constitutional authority to do that. They are changing regulations and creating laws out of thin air.”
“They are no longer working for the people of the United States. They are working for the international
community. There are so many treaties written up that they have (effectively) bound the United States. Whereas a
few of the treaties were not a problem, the abundance (100’s) of them have now taken control over all of our
lives” -Michael Coffman
UN Treaty on Biological Diversity Assessment on Desirable Culture:
“…Traditional societies have considered certain sites as sacred, where most human activities are
prohibited.”
That is the heart of the Convention on Biodiversity. Locking up nearly 50% of the land area of the United
States is their idea of protecting biological diversity. -Michael Coffman
UN Treaty on Biodiversity Diversity Usage of Fertilizers Not Sustainable:
“That fertilizers have played an essential part in producing the world’s harvests is undisputed. (It) is
estimated that if the use of fertilizers ceased, the world’s harvests would be cut almost in half. However, the
negative side of the equation is that the nitrates from fertilizers seep into ground water aquifers and they are
seriously implicated in the eutrophication of lakes, rivers and coastal ecosystems causing often drastic changes in
the fauna and flora.”
“They are willing to take a course of action that will reduce the world’s food supply by half, or more, as
they will likely reduce the use of pesticides knowing full well how many people this will
kill”. -Michael Coffman
UN Biodiversity Assessment on Sustainable Human Population; US Senate September 9,
1994:
“A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard
of living would be one billion people. This must be implemented within 30-50 years, 2/3’s of the population must be
cut.”
“The UN says property rights are not absolute and unchanging, but are there for the convenience of whatever
government wants to do.” – Michael Coffman
“Nobody owns biodiversity, so everything we do impinges on biodiversity. Property rights become meaningless.
At the Rio De Janeiro Summit it was decided that the Global Environmental Facility would be the depository of all
property rights.” – Michael Coffman
UN Biodiversity Assessment The Worldview of Western Civilization Section 12.2.3, Page
835:
The western “worldview is characteristic of large-scale societies, heavily dependent on resources brought from
considerable distances. It is a worldview that is characterized by the denial of sacred attributes of nature…
(which) became firmly established about 2000 years (ago) with the Judeo-Christian-Islamic religious
traditions.”
This same treaty considers rocks to be living beings on an equal plane with human beings. Rocks, many believe,
will reincarnate into lower life forms; and gradually into human beings.
Bureau of Land Management Internal Working Document
“Soylent green is… humans.”
Human Dimensions of Ecosystem Management Objective/Purpose:“All
ecosystem management activities should consider human beings as biological resources…” (Reminiscent of
Soylent Green)
This document was brought before Congress. This statement created such an uproar that it was removed. Regardless
of its removal, it still serves to prove the mindset of these people; and just because this was removed from a
document it does not mean it was removed from the thoughts and the intended goals of those who penned it; or who
believe it.
“For the elite to be able to have management of the ecosystem, humans would have no more value than a
rock.” – Michael Coffman
UN Biodiversity Treaty UN Global Biological Assessment Sustainable Human Populations:
“Population growth has exceeded the capacity of the biosphere” (i.e. the earth) “It is estimated that an
‘agricultural world’ in which most human beings are peasants should be able to support 5 to 7 billion people.”
Now I feel is an appropriate time to cover some other areas of government, as well as private organizations that
would like to see the population of the world decrease at an astounding rate (up to 90%). This is a dark, bloody
agenda that will cause terrible hardship and pain upon millions of people.
World Wildlife Fund, World Resources Institute International Union for the Conservation of Nature
(IUCN):
The IUCN involves the EPA, US Fish & Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, the United States Forest
Service, Sierra Club, the Nature Conservancy, the National Wildlife Fund, the National Audubon Society, National
Resources Defense Council, UNESCO, the Environmental Defense Fund, the U.N. Environmental Program, etc. .
IUCN 1992
Covenant On the Environment and Development:“Eventually a wilderness network would
dominate a region and thus would itself constitute the matrix, with human habitations being the islands. The
remaining half of the US would be used as buffer zones.”
“The night before this treaty was ratified, Senator Mitchell withdrew it from the calendar and it was never
voted on. It took four men, devoted to God in prayer to stop this treaty. The treaty still waits in the wings. Upon
ratification, the US will have no ability to protect its own citizens.” -Michael
Coffman
Henry Kissinger had a similar plan to use food as a weapon in 1974, found in the National Security Study
Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests; which was
adopted as official policy by then President Gerald Ford in November of 1975. This Memorandum
outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in lesser-developed countries by means of
birth control, and implicitly, war and famine. Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as National
Security Advisor, (the same post Scowcroft held in the Bush Administration), was put in charge of implementing the
plan. CIA Director George H.W. Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the Secretaries of State, Treasury,
Defense and Agriculture.
This document has never been renounced, only certain portions have been amended, leaving it as
the foundational document on population control issued in the U.S. Government.
The major players in the founding of this document are as follows:
Henry Kissinger Richard Nixon Margaret Sanger Paul Ehrlich Werner Fornos Timothy Wirth The United Nations
Population Fund The United States Agency for International Development Planned Parenthood Federation of America
International Planned Parenthood Federation The Club of Rome UNICEF WHO United Nations World Bank
The document can be read here in its entirety, along with the other organizations and individuals complicit in
this abomination:
Let it be noted that Adolph Hitler also used food as
weapon, stating that food is “a beautiful instrument…for maneuvering and disciplining the masses.” Food has been
used as a weapon of war for centuries. Why then would it be outrageous for the elite to use food as a weapon, both
a physical and a psychological weapon, in a declared war on overpopulation? It would not be outrageous at all. As
has been said time and time again, history repeats itself.
Now we will cover the Earth Charter.
The Earth Charter; A Radical Global Religion, created by Mikhail Gorbachev and Michael
Strong: “The Earth Charter initiative reflects the conviction that a radical change in
humanity’s attitudes and values is essential to achieve social, economic and ecological well-being in
the 21st century… The commission…plans to circulate a final version of the Charter as a People’s Treaty beginning
in mid-1998. The Charter will be submitted to the U.N. General Assembly in the year 2000…(where it will) ensure a
very strong document that reflects the emerging new global ethics.” This is unprecedented
(it is) the first component of an authentic global governance. We are working for
dialogue and peace. We are demonstrating our ability to assert control over our fate in a spirit of solidarity to
organize our collective sovereignty over this planet, our common heritage.”
The American people were not allowed to see this. Americans as a whole do not want the UN to be the head of a
world government. The one thing the majority of this country values, above most everything else, is their freedom.
Or the semblance of freedom we have left should I say.
At the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, the Presidential Council on Sustainable Development in 1996 came to the
conclusion that the world’s human population should not exceed 500 million people. That is a
93% reduction in population!
According to the UN video, “Armed to the Teeth”; and also in the Freedom From War Policy -put into effect by JFK
in 1961-general and complete disarmament and US military power was given over, in full, to the UN. This is a loss
of the sovereignty of America. (Read this document at http://www.scribd.com/doc/5009662/FreedomFrom-War).
The Earth Charter (1992), A Spiritual Vision: “A consensus has developed that the Earth
Charter should be…the articulation of a spiritual
vision that reflects universal spiritual
values, including, but not limited to, ethical values…a people’s charter that serves as a
universal code of conduct for ordinary
citizens, educators, business executives, scientists, religious leaders, non-governmental organizers and
national councils of sustainable development; and a declaration of principles that can serve as a “soft tax”
document when endorsed by the UN General Assembly. ”
In its original form, The Earth Charter failed miserably due to open, blatant pantheistic approach. Gorbachev
and Strong have worked diligently to change the language and make it appear less obvious. You may be wondering what
the Earth Charter has to do with depopulation. It has everything to do with it. Here is a very brief synopsis of
what the Charter holds for us.
According to the Charter, we must:
* “Recognize that all beings are interdependent and every form of life has value…” (Unborn children, of course,
are not included in the UN’s definition of “every form of life.” The Earth Summit II documents continue to support
the UN’s pro-abortion policies.)
* “Affirm faith in the inherent dignity of all human beings.” (UN agencies, however, support policies of
euthanasia for those determined not capable of living a “quality” life.)
* “Adopt at all levels sustainable development plans and regulations….” (This is a prescription for global
socialism in a super-regulated global state.)
* “Prevent pollution of any part of the environment…” (Enforcing this dictum would mean stopping virtually all
human activity.)
* “Internalize the full environmental and social costs of goods and services in the selling price.” (This
seemingly harmless sentence would empower the state to price, tax, and regulate all production and
consumption.)
* “Ensure universal access to health care that fosters reproductive health and responsible reproduction. (This
is a thinly disguised call for that includes abortion and population control.)
* “Eliminate discrimination in all its forms, such as that based on race … [and] sexual orientation.” (This
provision is clearly aimed at criminalizing those who refuse to accept homosexuality as positive and good.)
* “Promote the equitable distribution of wealth within nations and among nations. (See;
The Earth Charter has not been ratified.
Do not make the mistake of assuming it has not been interwoven into our society, however! It is being taught in our
schools and promoted shamelessly by Hollywood, the UN, NBC (owned by GE), ABC, CBS, CNN, HLN & all the Fox
owned stations, with the exception of Fox News in order to keep the supporters blinded to the machinations of
Rupert Murdock. Do not be deceived!
The ability to freely procreate is soon to be removed from us, much as it has been in China for many years. Not
only will we not be allowed to have children, anyone who is termed a “useless eater” (A term coined by Henry
Kissinger) will be euthanized: Mercilessly culled.
In Sweden , the “Sterilization Act of 1934″ provided for the voluntary sterilization of some mental patients.
The law was passed while the Swedish Social Democratic Party was in power, though it was also supported by all
other political parties in Parliament at the time, as well as the Lutheran Church and much of the medical
profession. -Wikipedia
America is scheduled to become compliant to Codex Alimentarius (CA) as of December 31, 2009.
Codex Alimentarius is going to regulate virtually anything that you put into your mouth that is not a
pharmaceutical. The World Trade Organization (WTO) has accepted Codex Alimentarius and any nation that is a member
of the WTO must become compliant with CA. In any dispute between 2 countries, the one that is
Codex compliant automatically wins. This is quite an incentive for all nations to become compliant. – Rima
Laibow
CA guidelines set for vitamins & minerals are said to be voluntary, however, they are scheduled to become
mandatory on December 31, 2009. In 1994, Codex Alimentarius declared nutrients to be
poisons: See the Dietary Supplement Health Education Act (DSHEA).Yet fluoride is
acceptable! Why? It creates complacency. Proper nutrients will ensure a longer, healthier life. Not at all in
keeping with a depopulation agenda.
From Esoteric Agenda, a documentary by Ben Stewart:
“In 1962 it was decreed that there would be a move toward total global implementation of Codex Alimentarius. The
date set for implementation is December 31, 2009. WHO and FAO are the commissions in charge of CA. They fund it and
run it at the request of the U.N.
According to WHO & FAO, epidemiological projections, it is estimated that according to the vitamin and
mineral guideline alone; when CA goes into global implementation on December 31, 2009, it will result in a
minimum of 3 billion deaths; 1 billion due through starvation. The next 2 billion will
die from preventable diseases due to malnutrition.”
“The U.N. has put out dozens of reports calling for an 80% reduction in population (most put the number at 90%).
At the 1997 Women’s World Conference in Beijing, the head of the U.N. Food Program said, “We will use food as a
weapon against the people.””
In conjunction with Codex Alimentarius, food will be limited and water consumption will be decreased to
10 gallons per day, per person. The average American uses 140 gallons of water every day. The
food provided will be Genetically Modified and nutrient deficient.
As of the Codex Alimentarius (CA) implementation date of 12/31/09, if there were a famine anywhere in the world,
it will be illegal to send any high nutrient density biscuits. Or to distribute them!!
Once a country becomes CA compliant, CA can never be repealed. Membership with the WTO robs the member
nations of any and all sovereignty. Germany is now CA compliant.
Codex Alimentarius goes hand in hand with Agenda 21 and the Kyoto Treaty. The deadline to implement both Agenda
21 and the Kyoto Treaty is 2012.” (Rima Laibow)
Agenda 21 was birthed out of the Rio Summit 1992. Agenda 21 (A 21), a.k.a. Smart Growth, Regionalism, Visioning
Processes, Action Plans, Shared Values; 20/20, Best Practices; Community Festivals & Public/Private
Partnerships. These are the names you will hear A 21 called, the buzzwords.
Every county must set up a council to oversee the implementation of A 21. A 21 is Sustainable Development.
Steven Rockefeller set up the Earth Charter, referenced above. The Earth Charter is the new One World Religion:
Earth worship. The earth is considered to be ‘sacred’, and its protection is a ‘sacred trust’. Global
responsibility will demand basic changes in values, behaviors and attitudes of government, the private sector, and
civil society.
Under Sustainable Development man is considered to be responsible for the pollution of the planet and is
subordinate to all other living creatures. This is a direct contradiction to the Bible where God
placed man in a position of dominance over the entire earth. The elite will worship and serve the creature, rather
than the Creator.
“The environmental agenda is a spiritual agenda with earth worship at its root. As such, the following practices
are all considered to be unsustainable: Fossil fuels, artificial fertilizers, modern systems of agricultural
production, irrigation water, herbicides, pesticides, farmland, pastures, grazing of livestock, consumerism,
dietary habits, salt, sugar, private property, paved roads, dams, reservoirs, logging activities, fencing of
pastures”. – Joan Peros
“Every environmental resource must be measured. What can be measured can be managed under
the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Project.” – Joan Peros
Among the things considered to be unsustainable, as listed above, these are included: Monotheism and the family
unit. The health care plan of President Obama is under A 21. Under this health care plan, the family unit is very
much being attacked. Anyone over age 65 must undergo ‘end of life counseling’ by their doctor every 5 years.
Abortion will be pushed that much harder, especially with the Science Czar wanting sterilants put into our water
supply! One of the new appointee’s to the Obama Administration once said in a book he co-wrote that a child could
be killed up to the age of 2 years old! What kind of a monster could think that is acceptable?
Nearly the exact language used to define Sustainable Development was taken from the 1977 Soviet Constitution!
The Family Dependency Ratio, under the United Nations, will look at every household. They will gauge what that
household has produced in accordance with what it has used (i.e., resources) by the water bills, energy bills, etc.
Are you using more than you are producing? Are you adding to the collective, or merely taking away? This is how the
powers that be will determine whether you are a productive citizen, or, in the words of Henry Kissinger, “A useless
eater”.
In 1990, Prince Charles formed The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum to bring together 50-60 of the world’s
topmost multi-national/transnational corporations to start buying up governments around the world. This is
Public/Private Partnerships: This is the very definition of fascism.
I must stop here. At the rate things are now moving, I could add to this daily. But, December 31 is not so far
away now, only 4 months. I must get this out now. Time is short.
If you find this to be worthy, please, spread it everywhere you can. Email it, blog
it, post it on forums; mail it. Do what you must. People are asleep. They must be woken up. Forced
immunizations are right around the corner. These things will come to pass. It is our job to warn people.
Please, I ask you, warn them.
CNN Founder Ted Turner
Supports
Population Reduction To 2 Billion!!
CNN Founder Ted Turner Supports Population Reduction To 2 Billion!!
Maafa 21:Black Genocide in 21st Century Americawill take those who have sat on the sidelines of the abortion fight and drive them
to the streets.This powerful DVD is about eugenics, racial agendas, and elitism. It exposes the ties
between the Nazis, the American eugenics movement, Planned Parenthood, and a plan to create "racial purity"
that began over 150 years ago.
ENDGAME:
Blueprint For Global Enslavement,explains how for the New World Order, a world government
is just the beginning. Once in place they can engage their plan to exterminate 80% of the world's population, while
enabling the elites to live forever with the aid of advanced technology. For the first time, crusading filmmaker
Alex Jones reveals their secret plan for humanity's extermination: Operation ENDGAME.
ENDGAME
(FULL MOVIE)
Description
For the New World Order, a world government is
just the beginning. Once in place they can engage their plan to exterminate 80% of the world's
population, while enabling the elites to live forever with the aid of advanced technology. For
the first time, crusading filmmaker Alex Jones reveals their secret plan for humanity's
extermination: Operation ENDGAME.
Jones chronicles the history of the global
elite's bloody rise to power and reveals how they have funded dictators and financed the
bloodiest wars – creating order out of chaos to pave the way for the first true world
empire.
Watch as Jones and his team track the
elusive Bilderberg Group to Ottawa and Istanbul to document their secret summits,
allowing you to witness global kingpins setting the world's agenda and instigating
World War III
Learn about the formation of the North
America transportation control grid, which will end U.S. sovereignty
forever
Discover how the practitioners of the
pseudo-science eugenics have taken control of governments worldwide as a means to carry
out depopulation
View the progress of the coming
collapse of the United States and the formation of the North American
Union
REACH OUT TO OTHERS
[Help Educate Family And Friends With This Page And The Links Below]