The World Health Organization provides public health
recommendations about the use of pharmacologic drugs and vaccines and provides guidelines and assistance in public
health emergencies. When it was founded in 1948, the WHO relied on funding from its member states; their
contributions were assessed based on their national income and population. The funds were not earmarked for any
particular policy. In those days, the WHO was an independent organization. But over time, the WHO leadership traded
its independence and with it, its integrity, for big money.
In 1988, Halfdan Mahler, Director General of the WHO from 1973 to
1988, warned the world against the power wielded by the pharmaceutical industry over the WHO. He stated, in the
Danish daily newspaper (Politiken): “this industry is taking over WHO”. Unfortunately, no one at that time believed
him.[1] The take-over intensified; with Big Pharma dictating global public health policies that the WHO initiates
and promotes. Those policies have vastly enriched Big Pharma, and the WHO has been generously rewarded for its
service.
Currently, 80% of the WHO budget relies on earmarked donations;
primarily from the U.S. government, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Big Pharma. The WHO revenue in
2016-2017 was $5, 139 Billion, of which only $927 million came from assessed contributions by member states; these
“core” funds cover the WHO’s general expenses. By contrast, $4,422 Billion were provided by major donors; and these
funds are earmarked for activities that serve the donor’s financial interests. These major donors dictate and
control the WHO policies, ensuring that WHO policies further their interests. [2]
The WHO, it should be noted, is not accountable to public scrutiny
– as non-profits are. The internal documents of the WHO are not available under Freedom of Information, and most of
the WHO’s financial contracts are secret. In essence, the WHO became a vassal of, and the global marketing agent
for Big Pharma and its aggressive drug and vaccine market expansion agenda. Time and again, the WHO has
demonstrated its allegiance to its financial backers; adopting that have vastly enriched Pharma – even as the
widespread, use – and misuse – of multi-drug cocktails and multi-virus vaccines – have caused epidemic number of
serious adverse side-effects, hospitalizations, chronic illnesses, and deaths. [3]
During Margaret Chan’s tenure, Bill Gates has had a
disproportionate influence over the WHO; his foundation has contributed more than $2.4 billion, while member
countries have grown reluctant to put their money into the agency, especially after the 2008 global financial
crisis. Bill Gates has been labeled by some as “the world’s most powerful
doctor”.
Excerpt from: Anatomy of Corruption: WHO Public Health Guidelines,
by Alliance For Human Research Protection
The Coronavirus Distraction...And The Continuing War On Iran
RonPaulLibertyReport | Mar 18, 2020
* Please Give Page Time To Load *
A damning investigation into the World Health Organisation's hidden practices Trust WHO The
World Health Organization (WHO) was founded with the aim of building a healthier future for people all over the
world. Whether it’s the effects of smoking, the Swine flu pandemic or a nuclear disaster, the WHO is the body we
rely on to advise on and resolve a public health crisis. But can it be trusted? TrustWho documents filmmaker Lilian
Franck’s quest to discover what lies behind the altruistic façade of the world’s largest public health body. What
she uncovers is an alarming picture of corruption and opacity. This powerful investigative doc shines a light on
how industry lobbies have infiltrated the WHO and asks whether the organisation can be trusted to keep the public
healthy.
Historically, the offices of physician and pastor have been among the most trusted
and respected of all callings. However, the Covid scamdemic of the past two years
showed us that the vast majority of physicians and pastors were all too willing to
abandon their callings and to transform themselves into sheepish slaves of the
state—with no mind or will of their own. Had physicians and pastors stood together
as one against what is the biggest hoax in world history, the massive damage that
we are still experiencing—and will continue to experience for many years to
come—would have never happened.
As far as I am concerned, the medical establishment
has not shown scientific evidence that the Covid virus (as it is touted) even
existed. To this day, the virus has not been scientifically isolated, as is
required for the proper identification of any novel virus. Therefore, I am still
not convinced that the Covid virus (again, as it is touted) ever existed. (We know
that the coronavirus as associated with the common cold has been around
forever.)
But even if the virus does exist (as touted), the
so-called cure is a thousand times worse than the disease. And the only
reason that everyone doesn’t know that is because to this very day the medical
establishment and their puppets in the government and media continue to LIE TO
US.
Which leads to the question: Can we ever trust the
medical establishment again?
I’ll tell you this: For me and my house, the answer
is a resounding NO—at least regarding the subject of vaccinations. The chronic liar
and medical fraud, the modern-day version of Dr. Josef Mengele—Anthony Fauci—and
his cabal of pharmaceutical mercenaries at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
have forever destroyed my faith in anything they say regarding vaccinations.
To be sure, there are still thousands and thousands
of good, honest, sincere and conscientious physicians in this country. I personally
know hundreds of them. Sadly, too many of even these good doctors fell in line with
the Covid lie and wouldn’t take a public stand against it.
I am proud to say that at the very height of the
Great Covid Deception, Liberty Fellowship’s very own Dr. Annie Bukacek was
one of the very first—if not the first—physicians to publicly blow the
whistle on the scam.
Here is her courageous speech delivered April 5, 2020, that
went viral across the country and became a catalyst for other doctors speaking
out.
As an aside, this plucky physician is now running
for a seat on Montana’s Public Service Commission and really could use your support
as this campaign comes down to the last couple of weeks.
Her liberal Democrat opponent has received tens of
thousands of dollars from national liberal PACs around the country. They are doing
everything they can to keep this brave soul off of this important commission.
If you are able to send her a campaign contribution,
you would be supporting one of the bravest physicians—and Americans—in this country
and helping to put a champion for Liberty in one of the most important political
offices in the entire State.
Here is the postal address if you would like to
write a personal check (no company checks accepted):
Dr. Annie for PSC5
PO Box 8975
Kalispell, MT 59904
I keep a running account of the under-reported
deleterious ramifications of the Covid “vaccines” on my website here. I invite you to take a few minutes and look through
the massive amount of information documenting the deaths and injuries caused by
the Covid death shots and the cover-up of these facts by the media and medical
establishments.
It is a chilling thought to think
of just how many people in the coming months and years are going to die because of
getting “vaccinated” for the . . . coronavirus (COVID-19).
According to Dr. David Martin, as
many as 700 million people worldwide will succumb to an early grave because of the shots, which we
know flood a person’s body with deadly, clot-forming spike proteins.
Martin came up with this number
after poring through data from the World Health Organization’s (WHO) “Decade of
Vaccines” vision, which was put together in collaboration with billionaire
eugenicist Bill Gates, who lives to vaccinate.
It was in 2011 when the WHO
announced the Decade of Vaccines plan, which aims to depopulate the world by about
15 percent. That figure amounts to about 700 million people.
Back in August 2021, Dr. Robert
Young estimated that 500 million people worldwide had already at that time been
injured by the jabs, with possibly 35 million deaths.
This past August, Steve Kirsch
threw out a more conservative ballpark figure of 12 million deaths from covid
jabbing, based on an estimate of one death per 1,000 doses.
“We are killing nearly close to
10,000 people every single day,” Kirsch wrote.
That same month, Peter Halligan
pieced together data suggesting that as many as 20 million people have thus far
died from the shots, while a whopping 2.2 billion have suffered at least one
injury.
All of this suggests that things
are only just getting started in terms of the fallout from these mystery
injections. Assuming only 20 million people have died, we are only about three
percent of the way there to the full death count.
To think that hundreds of
millions of people are now the walking dead – meaning they could drop dead
at any moment once the clots fully form in just the right spot – is nothing short
of disturbing.
Official government and Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggests that 1.2 million Americans have
already passed away because of the COVID-19 mRNA injections falsely being called “vaccines.” Ben Armstrong did not mince
words in the September 23 episode of “The Ben Armstrong Show,” as he shared
shocking data provided by official government sources.
The adverse effects numbers associated with the Covid-19
injections are already horrifying. In the “best case scenario” Armstrong
estimates that 2.3 million Americans are permanently disabled and 1.2 million
are already dead because of the shots.
Armstrong said that he was given
the actual Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data which the mainstream
media does not report on, at least not accurately.
“I’m giving you the calculated
VAERS data. And this is not a scam,” Armstrong told his viewers. “This is not
scaremongering. But if you’re skeptical and thinking, oh my gosh, this is over the
top. In fact, I’m underselling it.
Note that Mr. Slavo is using official government CDC
numbers—numbers that aren’t reported by the mainstream media. Those numbers are
staggering enough; but the numbers put forward by Dr. Martin above are
bone-chilling.
As stated, Bill Gates is the world’s foremost
eugenicist—as was his father. In the netherworld to which Gates and his little
Frankenstein toady Anthony Fauci will soon enter, there can be little doubt that
these two mass murderers are recognized as having slaughtered more people than any
two mass killers of history—maybe more than all of the mass murderers
combined.
And here is one more report I must share with
readers, as you will not read this report in very many places either.
In a powerful letter making waves
across Europe, French General Christian Blanchon praised citizens who refused the experimental Covid
“vaccines” injections. Despite years of pressure campaigns, discriminatory policies,social exclusion, loss of income, threats, and being blamed for other’s deaths, the General thanked the
“unvaccinated” for their strength, courage, and leadership:
Even if I were fully vaccinated,
I would admire the unvaccinated for standing up to the greatest pressure I have
ever seen, including from spouses, parents, children, friends, colleagues, and
doctors.
People who have been capable of
such personality, courage, and such critical ability undoubtedly embody the best of
humanity.
They are found everywhere, in all
ages, levels of education, countries, and opinions.
They are of a particular kind;
these are the soldiers that any army of light wishes to have in its ranks.
They are the parents that every
child wishes to have and the children that every parent dreams of having.
They are beings above the average
of their societies; they are the essence of the peoples who have built all cultures
and conquered horizons.
They are there, by your side,
they seem normal, but they are superheroes.
They did what others could not
do; they were the tree that withstood the hurricane of insults, discrimination, and
social exclusion.
And they did it because they
thought they were alone and believed they were alone.
Excluded from their families’
Christmas tables, they have never seen anything so cruel. They lost their jobs, let
their careers sink, and had no more money… but they didn’t care. They suffered
immeasurable discrimination, denunciations, betrayals, and humiliation… but they
continued.
Never before in humanity has
there been such a casting; we now know who the resisters are on planet Earth.
Women, men, old, young, rich,
poor, of all races and all religions, the unvaccinated, the chosen ones of the
invisible ark, the only ones who managed to resist when everything fell apart.
Collapsed.
You’ve passed an unimaginable
test that many of the toughest marines, commandos, green berets, astronauts, and
geniuses couldn’t pass.
You are made of the stuff of the
greatest that ever lived, those heroes born among ordinary men who shine in the
dark.
Almost everything you have heard about Revelation
Chapter Six and the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse is patently untrue. And, yes,
it took me over 30 years to figure that out, so don’t feel bad.
But in this message, I explain exactly who the Four
Horsemen are—and are NOT.
*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial
opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may be made by credit card, check,
or Money Order. Use this link:
Before the US economy disintegrates into nothingness — Will any so-called expert out there also notice
that the WHO Director caused a global coronavirus panic over a basic math error?
The controversial Ethiopian politician and Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO),
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, claimed in a press conference in early March that the fatality rate for the coronavirus
was many multiples that of the fatality rate of the common flu.
While many people globally have built up immunity to seasonal flu strains, COVID-19 is a new virus to which
no one has immunity. That means more people are susceptible to infection, and some will suffer severe
disease.
Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died. By comparison,
seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1% of those infected.
This statement led to the greatest panic in world history as the global elite media shared and repeated that the
coronavirus was many, many times more deadly than the common flu.
The problem is his statement is false.
It was not accurate!
As
The Gateway Pundit reported Monday, the coronavirus mortality rate reported by the media as stated by Dr.
Ghebreyesus is completely inaccurate.
Here’s a summary of the analysis updated with today’s latest numbers proving the Director General’s statement
was very misleading and materially false:
N/A – not available
A look at the numbers:
** Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus used the actual number of deaths due to coronavirus divided by
confirmed cases to get his 3.4% mortality rate number (from last week -since that time the mortality rate based on
current reported numbers is near 4%)
** Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus then compared the actual coronavirus mortality rate to an estimated
flu mortality rate of 0.1% — The US flu mortality rate is based on an estimated 22,000 deaths divided by an
estimated 36 million flu cases giving a 0.1% mortality rate.
** Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus compared known numbers for coronavirus (3.4 percent mortality rate)
but did not include the estimated number of those infected who are
asymtomatic. This number is likely in the tens of thousands and could be in the millions! There is
no way of knowing right now. One study released this week
revealed that 6
of 7 people infected by coronavirus are asymptomatic! They do not know they are infected!
** Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus then compared the known numbers of 206,845 cases of coronavirus to
the millions of estimated annual cases of flu cases. Again he does not
include the asymtomatic cases, the 6 of 7 people infected who do not suffer severe symptoms.
** If asymtomatic cases are included in Ghebreyesus’s calculation the
actual mortality rate of the coronavirus is somewhere between 0.2% to 0.8% or lower.
Ghebreyesus compared apples to oranges and his numbers were completely inaccurate!
* * * * * * * * * * *
As of Wednesday morning.
There were 7,301 confirmed cases in the US.
There were 116 confirmed deaths associated with the coronavirus in the US.
The mortality rate for those two sets of numbers is 1.6%.
We also know that according to
a new study by the journal Science — 6 of 7 coronavirus
victims, or
86% of infections, were undocumented.
If latest study published in the Science journal is correct then
the coronavirus scare will be the greatest hoax in world history causing trillions and trillions of
dollars
in economic damage.
The WHO and Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus need to be held responsible!
[BOMBSHELL] [...CDC report
confirming that the Covid-19 death rate is far, far lower than originally
estimated...]
Mandatory Masks, Contact Tracing, Social
Distancing - Tyrants Desperately Clinging To Power -
RonPaulLibertyReport | 5/27/20
With a new CDC report confirming that the Covid-19 death rate is far, far lower than originally
estimated, and Covid deaths plummeting across the country, desperate governors are ignoring facts and imposing even
more authoritarian measures to oppress the population. With rebellion breaking out everywhere, at what point are we
going to see a clash between a population no longer believing the coronavirus myths (that it is ten times more
deadly than the flu, for example) and a political class drunk on power?
White House Press Corps Caught on Hot Mic "Take Off the Masks...It's a HOAX!"
HighImpactFlix | First published at 20:40 UTC on April 21st, 2020.
ALERT! This channel is in jeopardy and may soon be terminated by the powers-that-shouldn't be.
To resist the tyranny of censorship & stay connected...subscribe to my private newsletter. http://bit.ly/HighImpactFlixOfficial (don't forget to
CONFIRM)
- A MUST SEE AND SHARE
- ["...They Lied To
You!"] Lockdowns For Thee, Not For Me!
- #NewWorldNextWeek -
corbettreport | sMay 7, 2020
Welcome to the 406th episode of New World Next Week — the video series from Corbett
Report and Media Monarchy that covers some of the most important developments in open source
intelligence news. This week:
Story #1: UK Gov’t Scientist Neil Ferguson Resigns
After Breaking Lockdown Rules To Meet His Married Lover https://archive.is/s49yf
How Neil Ferguson, Architect of UK Lockdown, Was
Brought Down By Failing to Obey His Own Rules https://archive.is/XGfk3
Story #2: Clinton Fdn Wants To Use AmeriCorps As
“National Contact Tracing Corps” https://bit.ly/3b8xPYo
Video: ”We cannot continue to rely on our military in
order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national
security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." https://bit.ly/35DYtqM
Tom from Scotland asks about the mortality rate of Covid-19, and why it is reportedly so much
higher in Italy. James answers with an in-depth look at the numbers, how they're being reported, and what's being
left out from the equation.
How Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg
sees the current Corona pandemic
OVALmedia | Mar 13, 2020
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg is the first specialist we met to understand the current crisis about the
coronavirus. Please support us so that we can investigate further in making a 90min cinema documentary: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/co...
With this video, we don’t want to drive people to not obey the current rules and recommendations of
the government.
We will meet multiple personalities with different points of view and we will do extensive
fact-based research. During our path to the truth, we think it’s important to open the discussion and analyse all
sides. We intend to gather a maximum of information and then help to understand what is happening, and why it is
happening.
UKC News: How Gov’t, Media Are Misleading Public
About Coronavirus and COVID19
21wire | April 3, 2020 By
As western governments continue their draconian shut-down of economies, societies and democracy,
the real numbers continue to surface which prove that states forcing the public into ‘lockdown’ could have achieved
adequate public health precautions without completely imploding their countries.
Co-hosts Mike Robinson and Patrick Henningsen, along with special guest is Andrew Mather, a
mathematician and City finance and technology professional – for today’s end of week news round-up. Watch:
H1N1 'false
pandemic' biggest pharma-fraud of century? RT | Jan
12, 2010
The Council of Europe will launch a probe into pharmaceutical companies accused of
manipulating Swine Flu data.
This follows a claim by a renowned German scientist that vaccine manufacturers
pressured theWorld
HealthOrganisation into declaring a Swine Flu pandemic
seeking to increase profits.
The World Health Organization (WHO) was founded in 1948 with the aim of building a
healthier future "for everyone, everywhere".
Headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, the WHO is now 7,000 employees
strong, with six regional offices and 150 country offices around the world, and over 194 member states
adhering to the regulations released by the organisation as per the United Nations system.
Whether it's the effects of smoking, the swine flu pandemic or a nuclear disaster, the WHO is the body we
rely on to advise on and resolve a public health crisis. But can it be trusted? How does the WHO decide on its
recommendations? And how reliable are they?
Trust in the WHO's ability to objectively address global health matters is not as strong as it may have been at
its inception. And concerns regarding the organisation's finances and the influences of independent contributors
have been circulating since the 1950s when, after years of inaction, the WHO's relationship with key players in the
tobacco industry came to light.
They [WHO officials] have to depend on scientists. And the scientists are allocated to them by
the countries and by the organisations that finance the WHO. And many of them gave advice and made decisions
that benefited the pharmaceutical industry. -- Wolfgang Wodarg, former delegate to the
European Council
"The tobacco industry founded institutes and bought scientists who would represent their position and they made
sure their own names didn't appear anywhere," says former secretary of health of Switzerland, Thomas Zeltner. "So
the organisations were called things that wouldn't make you suspect they were really representing the tobacco
industry."
Scientists and other important figures within these institutes would often have links to both tobacco giants and
the WHO, simultaneously. One example was a toxicologist who served as a consultant for the WHO in the prime of the
tobacco movement, while on the payroll of an institute funded by multinational tobacco and cigarette manufacturer,
Philip Morris.
After the toxicologist's polyamorous relationship was revealed, however, he still remained a consultant to the
WHO.
There have since been numerous instances where seemingly unnatural relationships have arisen within institutes
with a vested interest in the WHO; most of which appeared to occur at the height of alleged global health
threats.
One such connection was between pharmaceutical companies such as Glaxo and Novartis, the countries that had
signed agreements to purchase swine flu vaccines produced by the aforementioned companies, and the WHO.
The trigger-point for the agreements was a pandemic alert issued by the WHO in 2009.
In the first quarter after the alert, France's largest drugmaker reported a whopping $1.95bn (1.71bn euro) profit annual increase.
The flu, however, did not live up to its deadly reputation. In Germany, 258 people died in the flu's first year of the outbreak - a figure far fewer than
deaths caused by a 'normal' flu outbreak.
While the WHO blamed its extravagant $18bn swine flu budget on being overly cautious, others were, and remain,
sceptical.
"At the time of the swine flu outbreak, I was WHO general-secretary in the Department of Public Health,
Intellectual Property and Medication. Nobody there was afraid," says German Velasquez, who currently works
with the Green Climate Fund (GCF).
"I didn't know anyone at the WHO who had himself vaccinated, including the director-general, who
told journalists in response to their questions that she hadn't had time but would get herself vaccinated
later."
Wolfgang Wodarg, former delegate to the European Council, enforces the scenario of uncertainty and veiled
truths, saying WHO personnel often turn a blind eye to the realities of certain situations in exchange for
funding.
"The WHO officials have no idea about such things. They have to depend on scientists. And the scientists are
allocated to them by the countries and by the organisations that finance the WHO. And many of them gave advice and
made decisions that benefited the pharmaceutical industry," says Wodarg.
Over the years, similar trends in relationships between the WHO, the UN and specific businesses and
organisations have emerged; some in the most unlikely and critical situations, including the Chernobyl
disaster.
As the WHO allegedly played down the number of deaths as caused directly by and due to the aftereffects of the
nuclear explosion, it had become clear that organisation was working closely with the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA). As a matter of fact, the IAEA was initially founded as the 'Atoms for Peace' agency under the UN
umbrella.
And while the two organisations have, ultimately, two very different endeavours - once concerning global health
and the other, the 'safe' use of atomic energy - not only Chernobyl, but also Fukushima were undersold in their
levels of devastation.
TrustWHO shines a light on how industry lobbies have infiltrated the WHO and asks whether the
organisation can be trusted to keep the public healthy.
Dr. Anthony Fauci is unquestionably an expert on infectious diseases, serving as the director of the National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since 1984. He has presided over emerging viruses such as H.I.V.,
SARS, Swine Flu, MERS, Ebola and others. In every case, the rhetoric that emerged sought to force social and
political behavior by suggesting a pandemic and prescribing radical action to combat the threat. Where those other
efforts failed to gain traction, the coronavirus COVID-19 has succeeded.
Dr. Fauci has now revealed his true Technocrat colors by stepping beyond his role of merely informing
policy-makers to making policy directly. This door was opened when President Trump granted him a policy platform
and authority to speak for the Federal government. Big mistake.
Since then, whatever disaster that COVID-19 might bring in medical terms, it has been far surpassed by social,
economic and political carnage that can only be described by one term: NATIONAL SUICIDE.
Dr. Fauci might be absolutely correct that COVID-19 is 10 times ‘more lethal’ than the seasonal flu, but since
his conclusions and predictions are only verifiable by himself, science has essentially become a god and he has
become its sole high-priest.
In any case, his scientific and medical expertise in no way qualifies him as an expert in sociology, economics
or political science. Yet, he is driving the shutdown of the entire nation to “prevent COVID-19 from
spreading.”
Fear Mongering Wins Again
First, alarmist “sky-is-falling” cries were made that millions of Americans could die. Second, the only way to
prevent these deaths is to stop contagion by shutting down social and economic activities. Fauci has since claimed
that he is open to a 14 day total national shutdown.
That is, shut down sports and community events, schools, churches, restaurants, transportation, factories,
services and any other activity where people would come into contact with each other. This insane mentality has now
caused national panic among civic leaders as well as citizens.
Ordinary people are panicked into the irrational hoarding of toilet paper. Really? State governors are firing
off executive orders left and right that are essentially promoting a form of “soft martial law” where civic and
religious groups above a certain people limit cannot meet. City mayors are shutting down restaurants, churches,
schools and government services.
These irrational measures are ripping apart the social and economic fabric of the entire nation. Store shelves
are emptied, the stock market is crashing, national economic activity has cratered, all in the name of saving us
from the coronavirus.
This is the exact reason why America should NEVER allow Technocrats to run the nation. And yet, Technocrats ARE
running the nation anyway… straight into the ground.
When America regains its senses, it will be too late to mitigate the damage. For now, Technocrats like Dr. Fauci
should go back to their laboratories to do something useful for mankind and stay out of the business of running the
nation.
[A MUST LISTEN] Technocrats See Economic Doom
As Open Door For Technocracy
Technocracy News & Trends for Monday, March 23, 2020
With Capitalism and Free Enterprise on the verge of collapse, Technocrats around the world are having a field day
getting ready for Technocracy to make its big debut. They are insane, but not as insane as we are if we let them
get away with it.
Stories covered today
Pandemic Opportunity: It’s Time For A Global Green New Deal
Want To Jump-Start The Economy? Include A Green New Deal In The Stimulus Package
Coronavirus Pandemic Seen To Accelerate 5G Rollout In US
Feds Look To Phone Location Data To Track Coronavirus
Power Grab: The National Plan To Vaccinate Every American
The Age of Terror was inaugurated with a series of controlled demolitions in New York City on
September 11, 2001. Now the world is being led into the Age of Biological Terror with a controlled demolition of
the economy that is already causing unprecedented carnage across markets and around the globe. As the dust settles
on this demolition, an entirely new economy is ready to be erected in its place: one in which no citizen will be
out of the sight of the all-seeing government. This week on The Corbett Report we examine the details of this
collapse and why the bankster class is seeking to destroy the financial Ponzi scheme that they themselves
created
Truthstream Media
First published at 05:27 UTC on October 15th, 2019.
Our first Bitchute-only video, the first of many. If you like what we're doing, please consider
supporting us over at Patreon. We're trying to finish our second feature-length film right now.
Patreon.com/truthstreammedia
Nonstop propaganda
from national media continues to frighten people into mental paralysis and submission to health
authorities. This Technocrat-led tsunami can only be resisted by individuals who refuse to play their assigned role in the Great Panic of
2020.
James Madison: "REFUSE TO COOPERATE"
"...If Enough People Do Not
Comply, Then I Don't Think It Will Work" - Melissa Dykes -
We're Living in 12
Monkeys
Truthstream Media | First published at 16:22 UTC on March 24th, 2020.
Who is Bill Gates? A software developer? A businessman? A
philanthropist? A global health expert? This question, once merely academic, is
becoming a very real question for those who are beginning to realize that Gates'
unimaginable wealth has been used to gain control over every corner of the fields
of public health, medical research and vaccine development. And now that we are
presented with the very problem that Gates has been talking about for years, we
will soon find that this software developer with no medical training is going to
leverage that wealth into control over the fates of billions of people.
In January of 2010, Bill and Melinda Gates announced a $10 billion
pledge to usher in a decade of vaccines. But far from an unalloyed good, the truth
is that this attempt to reorient the global health economy was part of a much
bigger agenda. An agenda that would ultimately lead to greater profits for big
pharma companies, greater control for the Gates Foundation over the field of global
health, and greater power for Bill Gates to shape the course of the future for
billions of people around the planet.
The takeover of public health that we have documented in How
Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health and the remarkably brazen push to vaccinate
everyone on the planet that we have documented in Bill Gates' Plan to Vaccinate the
World was not, at base, about money. The unimaginable wealth that Gates has accrued
is now being used to purchase something much more useful: control. Control not just
of the global health bodies that can coordinate a worldwide vaccination program, or
the governments that will mandate such an unprecedented campaign, but control over
the global population itself.
There can be no doubt that Bill Gates has worn many hats on his
remarkable journey from his early life as the privileged son of a Seattle-area
power couple to his current status as one of the richest and most influential
people on the planet. But, as we have seen in our exploration of Gates' rise as
unelected global health czar and population control advocate, the question of who
Bill Gates really is is no mere philosophical pursuit. Today we will attempt to
answer that question as we examine the motives, the ideology, and the connections
of this man who has been so instrumental in shaping the post-coronavirus world.
Who Is Bill Gates?! MUST SEE Documentary By James Corbett
on Press For Truth!!
Press For Truth | First published at 18:06 UTC on May 26th,
2020.
Who Is Bill Gates is a documentary produced by James Corbett that explores the life
of Gates, his family background, his rise to power and how a software engineer
eventually became the trusted face of global health.
In a four part series this film covers his plan to monopolize
global health, to vaccinate the world, to create a population control grid and how
his eugenics ideology has shaped his world view. In this video Dan Dicks of Press
For Truth speaks with James Corbett of The Corbett Report about the making of the
film, life in a post Cover 19(84) world and most importantly what we as individuals
can do to help stop such a monolithic threat to society!
movie made by Arte: WHO – in the clutches of lobbyists?
Under-funded, and hugely dependent on private donors such as Bill Gates, can WHO still carry out
its mission to protect public health, or is it controlled by vested interests? A robust investigation into
conflicts of interest that hinder the WHO's effectiveness.
What's in a name? Everything. Find out about the latest attempt to package the
Orwellian total police state surveillance grid as something wonderful and wholesome—and why you
should never, ever say "contact tracing"—in this week's edition of #PropagandaWatch.
The Canadian government is currently ramping up their efforts to fight the spread of Covid-19 by
giving sweeping powers to police and by taking big brother into the digital realm. Contact tracing
apps are popping up on the provincial level and we may soon see a nationwide collective effort to
track trace and database every single thing everyone does. Meanwhile families are being forcefully
removed from their homes and taken to psychiatric facilities for peacefully protesting the
governments abuse of power. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth covers the latest police
state news in Canada while also providing workable solutions on how to avoid being tracked by the
government in this post Covid-19(84) world.
As the people of the world grapple with a pandemic that is demonstrably less deadly
than originally reported, the public is being primed to accept an exponential increase in invasions of personal
liberty and privacy. Every day the public grows more weary of lock downs which seem to never end, and the
bankrupting of individuals and businesses around the world. Amidst the frustration and protest a solution is being
presented.
To return to normal, we are told, we must accept certain changes to how our world
operates. Of course, this is actually a push to a “new normal” which will mark the worldafterCOVID-19. Just like the attacks of September 11, 2001, there is the world
we knew before, and there is the post-9/11 era. We are currently in the middle of the COVID-19 era and a shift to
post-COVID19 life will not happen without the completion of local, state, national, and international programs
which identify potential infectees, test them, and, if positive, quarantine them in their homes or other government
facilities.
This is what is known as a contact tracing program. You have likely heard the term
in recent days and weeks because a number of local and state bodies within the United States are considering or
already launching contact tracing programs. Nations like China, Singapore, India, South Korea, and Israel have
implemented these programs but have also faced criticism from digital rights advocates for violations of privacy
protections.
So what exactly is contact tracing?
Contact tracing is a process of identifying individuals who may have come into
contact with an infected person, collecting information about their contacts, and then tracing the contacts of
infected individuals. All persons who may have come into contact with an infected individual are tested for
infection, treated for the infection, and their contacts traced as well.
Regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, we are seeing calls for digital contact tracing
using cell phones to notify individuals when they may have come into contact with an infected person or visited a
hot spot of infection. Digital contact tracing apps use Bluetooth to track encounters, a move which is supposed to
anonymize actual location data. Other forms of contact tracing apps involve the use of location data gathered from
cellular networks.
Additionally, tech giants Apple and Google have promised to help slow the spread of
the virus with new
tracking apps that the public can download to report themselves as infected. Using Bluetooth,
the phones will warn app users when they are near an infected person or a hot spot. The programs will use data
from Android and iPhone users who volunteer for the program later this month. Jennifer Granick, a surveillance
and cybersecurity attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union told Politico that the joint effort between
the tech companies “appears to mitigate the worst privacy and centralization risks.” However, “there
is still room for improvement.”
Microsoft is collaborating with the University of Washington on their own project
which the university promotes as a privacy based contact tracing app. Researchers with the University of Washington
and UW Medicine worked with volunteers from Microsoft to develop CovidSafe. The
researchers stated that the app will alert users about potential exposure to COVID-19, but will do so without
giving up anyone’s privacy.
“With CovidSafe, all information is stored locally on your phone unless you choose to share
that you’ve tested positive,”explained Justin Chan, a UW doctoral student in the Paul
G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering.“Only then is your data sent to a
secure server, and the app alerts anyone who has been nearby. After these notifications are sent, all the
information is deleted.”
CovidSafe is not the only attempt to build a privacy-based contact tracing program.
In April, a team of researchers launched Coalition, a free contact tracing app designed to protect users’ privacy and
protect communities during the COVID-19 crisis. Coalition claims to utilize secure Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) and
cryptography to protect a user’s identity by generating random anonymous IDs. The app uses Coalition’s Whisper
Tracing, an open source privacy-first protocol that randomizes a user’s device identity and does not share
identifiable information with the cloud.
Building a Contact Tracing Army
New York Governor Andrew Cuomorecently announced efforts by NY state to hire thousands
of contact tracers. The state’s contact tracing program is being developed with $10 million from former New York
City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and support from Johns Hopkins University. Cuomo stated that applicants will need to
go through a training program and pass an online exam before being granted the authority of contact tracer. The
state’s program will involve identifying COVID-19 positive individuals, interviewing them about contacts in the
previous two weeks, and then those contacts must isolate for two weeks.
By late April, calls for contact tracing had grown so loud that Congressman John
Garamendi introduced a bill that would “expand volunteer opportunities within AmeriCorps and the
Federal Emergency Management Agency”. Garamendi is the Co-Chair of the AmeriCorps, a nationwide volunteer force
created by former President Bill Clinton in 1993. The Orwellian bill –“Undertaking
National Initiatives to Tackle Epidemic Act”or the UNITE Act – would allow AmeriCorps
and FEMA to create a national contact-tracing corps.
“The coronavirus pandemic has put an unprecedented strain on our society, and our
nation requires a significant scaling of testing and contact tracing in order to flatten the curve and lift
stay-at-home orders,”
Garamendi stated.
Coincidentally, the UNITE Act lines up with recent calls for a contact tracing
“army”. The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control called for more contact tracers in the
state. Dr. Joan Duwve, the Director of Public Health for DHEC, said being able to test someone rapidly was
necessary. “We need an army of contact tracers to respond in a short time to someone who has a positive
diagnosis,”Duwve said.
On the opposite side of the country, California Governor Gavin Newsom has partnered
with the University of California, Los Angeles and the University of California, San Francisco to train more than
3,000 employees to become “coronavirus detectives“. During a live streamed press conference Newsom described the
efforts as a training academy designed to build an “army” of 20,000 people who can test, trace, and isolate people who may be infected.
Sonia Angell, California Department of Public Health director and State Health Officer, also stated that the new
contact tracing program will be connected to California’s existing digital disease surveillance platform. Angell
claims the database will be confidential.
The push for international contact tracing programs has also blossomed in nations
like South Korea and China, who are praised for their aggressive approaches to slowing the growth of the virus.
Forbes noted that South Korea has had a massive drop in COVID-19
diagnoses largely due to “mass rapid testing and comprehensive digitally-enabled contact tracing”. South Korea has
also used GPS phone tracking, CCTV cameras, credit card transaction monitoring, and automated text alerts as part
of a comprehensive universal contact tracing program.
The Chinese government approach is what you would expect from a totalitarian
communist state: an all encompassing app that pretty much “controls your
life.” Bloomberg describes China’s contact tracing app as a “public-private ‘health code’
system” which issues one of three risk assessments in the form of a colored QR code.“A green QR code, which denotes a low risk of having the virus, is the general default, while coming
into contact with an infected person can trigger a yellow code and a mandatory quarantine. Red is for a likely
or confirmed case,”Bloombergreported.It
does not take an extremely paranoid mind to see how this system could be easily abused.
The Indian government recently launched their contact tracing app – Aarogya Setu –
which quickly became the fastest downloaded app on record, with more than 83 million users. Although India is not
the first nation to implement a nationwide contact tracing program, the nation lacks strong privacy and data
protection laws for its more than 1.3 billion citizens. The Guardian reported that the pandemic is being “used as a pretext to erode privacy and
freedom of speech in the name of ‘winning the war’ against coronavirus.” In April The Guardian revealed that a draft government memo explained how the data
gathered by the contact-tracing app could be “de-anonymized” by government officials.
Israel’s attempted grab for tyrannical health surveillance powers were recently
hampered by a decision from the Supreme Court which banned the intelligence community from
tracing the phone location of those infected with COVID-19. The Israeli Shin Bet service was
given emergency powers through the end of April before the court warned of a “slippery slope” where the
surveillance tool could be used against innocent individuals. Whitney Webb recently reported that at least three tech companies involved in the build out
of the “coronavirus surveillance system” have connections to Israel’s government and the usual Big Tech
players.
Following The Orders of the WHO
In early April, Dr. Michael Ryan, the head of the
World Health Organization’s team responsible for the international containment and treatment of
COVID-19, called for looking into families to find potentially sick individuals and isolate them from their
families.
“Due to lock down, most of the transmission that is actually happening in many
countries now is happening in the household at a family level,”Ryan
stated. “In some senses, the transmission has actually been taken off the streets
and pushed back into family units… Now we need to go and look into families, and find those people
who are sick and remove them and isolate them in a safe and dignified manner.”
Ryan was also involved in the now-infamous Event 201, a global
pandemic simulation, conducted on October 18, 2019, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World
Economic Forum, and John Hopkins University Center for Health Security.
Ryan’s bio states that “from November 2013 to October 2014 he worked with GPEI as Middle East
Polio Response Coordinator” and partnered with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (among others) for a
vaccination program which reached 25 million children in eight target countries as part of 44 mass polio
vaccination campaigns.
Ironically enough, the WHO released a document in 2019 which states that under no
circumstances should contract tracing be used. The document, first
reported on by independent researcher Kenny Palurintano, details the WHO’s views on
Non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) in response to a pandemic. In section 6.1, “Contact Tracing,” under “quality
of evidence”, it states, “There is a very low overall quality of evidence that contact tracing has an unknown
effect on the transmission of influenza.” Additionally, under the “Executive Summary”, in Table 1, the WHO
lists contact tracing under the heading “Not Recommend In Any Circumstances”.
Despite the WHO’s own documents denying the validity of contact tracing, officials
in Ventura County are heeding the call of WHO official Dr. Michael Ryan. At a May 4 press conference, Ventura County
Public Health Director Dr. Robert Levin said those who live in homes where they could expose family members to
COVID-19 could be removed from their homes and moved into other health facilities.
“We also realize that as we find more contacts, some of the people we find are
going to have trouble being isolated. For instance, if they live in a home where there is only one bathroom and
there are three or four other people living there, and those people don’t have COVID infection, we’re not going to
be able to keep the person in that home,”Levin stated.“Every person who we’re isolating, for instance, needs to have their own bathroom.And so we’ll
be moving people like this into other kinds of housing that we have available.”
The Ventura County Public Health board did not elaborate on what other kinds of
housing might be made available to those unable to quarantine at home.
If there is a silver lining to the growing support for contact tracing, it might be
the public’s own hesitance to join. According to Forbes, nation-states need about 60 percent of their population to adopt
and regularly use the tool for it to be effective. Forbes reports that most cities are not likely to achieve 60% or
even 40% compliance. Unfortunately,Forbesreminds
us,“It’s a relentless fight. Andit takes an army of tracers.”
Forbes also notes that cities will need to “force changes of behavior” before reopening society.
“Contact-tracing apps are being seen as one of the conditions of ending
lockdowns—mandating and enforcing their use might become a logical next
step.“
How exactly the cities, states, and nations will enforce the use of contact tracing
apps remains to be seen, but we are already seeing a rise in reports of arrests of individuals who violate orders
to close businesses, stay home, and practice social distancing. What should we expect to see when an individual or
an entire community chooses to opt-out of contact tracing surveillance programs?
It is important to understand that contract tracing is only one part of an overall
strategy which poses a danger to liberty and privacy. In addition to creating mobile apps which snitch on you,
Apple, Facebook and Google are also sharing data
with the government to help determine if the public is following social distancing guidelines.
MIT Technology Review reported that at least one company is selling an app that uses machine
learning Artificial Intelligence to monitor social distancing. Meanwhile, Reuters reported that Amazon is using similar software to enforce social distancing
between their warehouse staff. There are also reports of “pandemic drones” flying above the skies of Connecticut
and Maryland to monitor social distancing and take temperatures.
Together these technologies represent the foundation of the Technocratic State,
built on top of the fears of a public which has been conditioned to accept any and all relief from the terrifying
round-the-clock coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic. If the public accepts the COVID1984 Technocracy in the name of
“getting back to normal” it’s likely the world we have known will be regarded as a relic of a past era, a quaint
idea of what life was like and what it could be, if only the public could defeat the new invisible enemy, COVID19.
However, it’s important to understand the institutions which are benefitting from the current pandemic. Only by
acknowledging the true power players – those who maneuver behind the scenes to profit and enslave – can the free
hearts and minds of the world defeat the true enemy: COVID-1984.
H.R.
6666: $100 Billion Dollar Contact Tracing Bill About
Controlling/Tracking Population Ben Swann | May 12, 2020
A House resolution from Illinois Democrat Rep. Bobby Rush that would put Big Government in charge
of tracking citizens’ movements as they relate to COVID-19 mitigation efforts — even sending health
bureaucrats to “individuals’ residences,” “as necessary,” as the legislation states
As the lockdowns go into place and the military takes to the streets
in country after country, the decades of preparation for medical martial law are finally paying off forthe pandemic
planners. Today on this emergency edition of The Corbett Report podcast, James lays out the steps that have led us
to the brink of martial law and the steps that are being taken to implement it now. Please help to spread this
important information and to raise awareness of the crisis that we are facing.
"Here’s the bottom line. You are not supposed to wait
2 or 4 years for some new politicians to get in office and give your permission to be free. You are not supposed
to wait 2 or 4 or 6 years for some federal court to tell you, “ok, you be free now.” You are supposed to stand
up resist, refuse to comply and nullify unconstitutional federal acts – as soon as they happen. All the money
and time you throw at firing congress or winning in federal court will never, ever work – unless you start
resisting right here in your state. And, that resistance needs to be your first response, not your
last."- Michael Boldin, Article: James Madison: How to Stop
the Federal Government
In response to federal overreach, most people tend to focus on three types of actions to stop them: elections,
conventions, and lawsuits. While they all have their place in an overall strategy to defend the Constitution, none
of them should be the first step forward. That is, if you follow the advice of the “Father of
the Constitution.”
Here’s what James Madison had to say in Federalist
#46. The Influence of the State and Federal Governments Compared:
“Should an unwarrantable measure of the federal government be unpopular in particular States, which would
seldom fail to be the case, or even a warrantable measure be so, which may sometimes be the case, the means of
opposition to it are powerful and at hand. The disquietude of the people; their repugnance and, perhaps refusal
to cooperate with officers of the Union, the frowns of the executive magistracy of the State; the embarrassment
created by legislative devices, which would often be added on such occasions, would oppose, in any State, very
serious impediments; and were the sentiments of several adjoining States happen to be in Union, would present
obstructions which the federal government would hardly be willing to encounter.”
Let me translate. Madison said that when the federal government passes an unconstitutional measure there are
powerful methods to oppose it – amongst the people and in the states. He also pointed out that those methods were
available even for warrantable, that is constitutional, measures.
Madison told us of four things that should be done to resist federal powers, whether merely unpopular, or
unconstitutional.
1. Disquietude of the people – Madison expected the people would throw a fit when the feds usurped
power – even using the word “repugnance” to describe their displeasure. That leads to the next step.
2. Repugnance and Refusal to co-operate with the officers of the Union – Noncompliance. The #1
dictionary of the time defined repugnance as “disobedient; not obsequious” (compliant). If you want to stop the
federal government, you have to disobey them. Madison also suggested that people would perhaps directly refuse to
cooperate with federal agents. This is an approach we preach here every day at the Tenth Amendment Center. James
Madison apparently knew what we know today. The feds rely on cooperation from state and local governments, as well
as individuals. When enough people refuse to comply, they simply can’t enforce their so-called laws.
3, The frowns of the executive magistracy of the State – Here Madison envisions governors formally
protesting federal actions. This not only raises public awareness; executive leadership will also lead to the next
step – legislative action.
4. Legislative devices, which would often be added on such occasions – Madison keeps this
open-ended, and in the years soon after, which I’ll cover shortly, we learn how both he and Thomas Jefferson
applied this step.
Madison also told us that if several adjoining States would do the same it would be an effective tool to stop
federal acts. To repeat, he said that doing this “would present obstructions which the federal government would
hardly be willing to encounter.”
Judge Andrew Napolitano agreed recently and said that people need to stop enforcing unconstitutional federal
laws. He also said that if you could get an entire state doing this, it would make federal laws “nearly impossible
to enforce.”
What’s important to note here, are some glaring omissions. The powerful means that Madison told us would be used
to oppose federal power successfully did NOT include federal lawsuits in federal courts. He also did NOT include
“voting the bums out” as a strategy, either.
FIRST RESPONSE
Compare that with how people generally respond to what they consider unconstitutional or unpopular federal acts
today.
The first thing I tend to hear from people who are opposed to a federal act is the “vote the bums out” mantra.
We’ll fire congress, right?
Or some people tell us we have to sue and let the courts decide.
I’ve got some news for you. There’s nothing from the founders – anywhere – in which they tell us that our first
response to extreme, repeated violations of the constitution and liberty is to vote the bums out, or sue the feds
in federal court. Nothing.
LEGISLATIVE DEVICES
Thomas Jefferson followed up on this in 1798 with the same kind of advice. That year, the Adams administration
passed a wildly unconstitutional attack on the freedom of speech with the Alien and Sedition Acts. In response,
while sitting as vice-president, Jefferson secretly drafted the Kentucky Resolutions, and here’s a little of what
he wrote:
“The several states composing the united states of america are not united on a principle of unlimited
submission to their general government.”
“where powers are assumed which have not been delegated, a nullification of the act is the rightful
remedy”
“that every State has a natural right in cases not within the compact to nullify of their own authority all
assumptions of power by others within their limits: that without this right, they would be under the dominion,
absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them”
Madison was consistent in his views on this. In 1798, he also drafted and help pass something known as the
Virginia Resolutions, a state-level “legislative device” in response to the Alien and Sedition Acts. Here’s a key
part:
in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said
compact, the states who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting
the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and
liberties appertaining to them.
Like Madison advised in Federalist #46, both he and Thomas Jefferson advised a state-level response to dangerous
federal acts. In 1798, neither of them even mentioned voting or lawsuits.
Jefferson told us that a “nullification is the rightful remedy.” And Madison told us that states are “duty-bound
to interpose.”
When Daniel Webster called on these same principles in response to military conscription plans during the war of
1812, he said:
“The operation of measures thus unconstitutional and illegal ought to be prevented by a resort to other
measures which are both constitutional and legal. It will be the solemn duty of the State governments to
protect their own authority over their own militia, and to interpose between their citizens and arbitrary
power. These are among the objects for which the State governments exist; and their highest obligations bind
them to the preservation of their own rights and the liberties of their people”
Here’s the bottom line. You are not supposed to wait 2 or 4 years for some new politicians to get in office and
give your permission to be free. You are not supposed to wait 2 or 4 or 6 years for some federal court to tell you,
“ok, you be free now.”
You are supposed to stand up resist, refuse to comply and nullify unconstitutional federal acts – as soon as
they happen.
All the money and time you throw at firing congress or winning in federal court will never, ever work – unless
you start resisting right here in your state. And, that resistance needs to be your first response, not your
last.
The World Health Organization provides public health recommendations about the use of pharmacologic drugs and
vaccines and provides guidelines and assistance in public health emergencies. When it was founded in 1948, the WHO
relied on funding from its member states; their contributions were assessed based on their national income and
population. The funds were not earmarked for any particular policy. In those days, the WHO was an independent
organization. But over time, the WHO leadership traded its independence and with it, its integrity, for big
money.
In 1988, Halfdan Mahler, Director General of the WHO from 1973 to 1988, warned the world against the power
wielded by the pharmaceutical industry over the WHO. He stated, in the Danish daily newspaper (Politiken):
“this industry is taking over WHO”. Unfortunately, no one at that time believed him.[1] The take-over intensified; with Big Pharma dictating global public health policies
that the WHO initiates and promotes. Those policies have vastly enriched Big Pharma, and the WHO has been
generously rewarded for its service.
Currently, 80% of the WHO budget relies on earmarked donations; primarily
from the U.S. government, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Big Pharma. The WHO revenue in 2016-2017
was $5, 139 Billion, of which only $927 million came from assessed contributions by member states; these
“core” funds cover the WHO’s general expenses. By contrast, $4,422 Billion were provided by major donors; and
these funds are earmarked for activities that serve the donor’s financial interests. These major donors
dictate and control the WHO policies, ensuring that WHO policies further their interests. [2]
The WHO, it should be noted, is not accountable to public scrutiny – as non-profits are. The internal documents
of the WHO are not available under Freedom of Information, and most of the WHO’s financial contracts are secret. In
essence, the WHO became a vassal of, and the global marketing agent for Big Pharma and its aggressive drug and
vaccine market expansion agenda. Time and again, the WHO has demonstrated its allegiance to its financial backers;
adopting that have vastly enriched Pharma – even as the widespread, use – and misuse – of multi-drug cocktails and
multi-virus vaccines – have caused epidemic number of serious adverse side-effects, hospitalizations, chronic
illnesses, and deaths. [3]
During Margaret Chan’s tenure, Bill Gates has had a disproportionate influence over the WHO; his foundation has
contributed more than $2.4 billion, while member countries have grown reluctant to put their money into the agency,
especially after the 2008 global financial crisis. Bill Gates has been labeled by some as “the world’s most
powerful doctor”.
In 2017, Politico examined
Bill Gates’ influence over the WHO, and the foundation’s influence is setting global public health priorities
that may not be in the best interest of those affected.
“Over the past decade, the world’s richest man has become the World Health Organization’s second biggest
donor, second only to the United States and just above the United Kingdom. This largesse gives him outsized
influence over its agenda, one that could grow as the U.S. and the U.K. threaten to cut funding if the agency
doesn’t make a better investment case.he size of his contributions have brought him an outsized influence on
the WHO’s agenda. He is treated like a head of state.
Gates’ priorities have become the WHO’s. Rather than focusing on strengthening health care in poor
countries – that would help to contain future outbreaks like the Ebola epidemic – the agency spends a
disproportionate amount of its resources on projects with the measurable outcomes Gates prefers.. [concerns
have been raised] that the foundation was distorting research priorities. ‘The term often used was
‘monopolistic philanthropy’.
Concerns about the software billionaire’s sway – roughly a quarter of WHO’s budget goes toward polio
eradication…the foundation’s focus on delivering vaccines and medicines, rather than on building resilient
health systems, has drawn criticism. And some NGOs worry it may be too close to industry. his sway has NGOs and
academics worried.
Some health advocates fear that because the Gates Foundation’s money comes from investments in big
business, it could serve as a Trojan horse for corporate interests to undermine WHO’s role in setting standards
and shaping health policies.
The foundation’s focus on delivering vaccines and medicines, rather than on building resilient health
systems, has drawn criticism. And some NGOs worry it may be too close to industry.In January,
30 health advocacy groups penned an open
letter to WHO’s executive board protesting against making the Gates Foundation an official partner of the
agency because its revenue comes from investments in companies that are at odds with public health goals, such
as Coca-Cola.”
A historical perspective is always revealing: whereas the WHO mission and propaganda
proclaim that its “overarching objective is to ensure healthy lives and to promote well-being for all at all
ages”, the WHO has consistently issued public health recommendations that served Big Pharma’s interest, but
caused severe harm to hundreds of thousands of people. The following are but a few examples of the betrayal of the
WHO mission of improving the public health.
WHO officials are not scientists; the scientists who work with WHO officials have been allocated to the WHO by
its donors. These scientists render decisions that benefit donor industries. The major beneficiary is the
pharmaceutical industry; but other beneficiaries include the tobacco industry, the nuclear energy industry, and the
agriculture genetic modification (GMO) industry.
The focus of this post is the complicity of the WHO in covering up – and/or precipitating – disastrous public
health consequences including cancer, birth defects, and a host of chronic neurological illnesses; illnesses and
deaths caused by the atomic energy industry and the pharmaceutical industry. Most of the focus is during the period
when Dr. Margaret Chan was the Director General of the WHO from 2006-2017.
- WHO downplayed the catastrophic health consequences following Chernobyl nuclear explosion
- WHO declared fake H1N1 “Swine Flu” pandemic
- WHO collaboration with Purdue to expanded opioid use & global addiction
- WHO failure to take action the Ebola outbreak in 2013
- WHO officials’ astronomical travel expenditures exposed in 2017
WHO downplayed evidence of catastrophic consequences following the 1986
Chernobyl nuclear power plant explosion.
In 2003, the United Nations launched an inter-agency Chernobyl Forum,
comprised of the European Commission, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), UN Development Programme,
the World Bank and the governments of the three most affected countries.
- The report, issued by the WHO in 2005, downplayed the dangers of radiation. The authors claimed that the 1986
Chernobyl nuclear power plant explosion resulted in fewer than 50 deaths, while conceding that there could possibly
be 4,000 deaths attributable to the Chernobyl accident. The report by the WHO-IAEA contradicted the accumulating
evidence of expansive, widespread contamination, and disregarded the harm suffered by populations exposed to
ionizing radiation, covering large swaths of Europe.
- The empirical evidence refuted the WHO-IAEA report. Evidence such as the fact that more than 36,000 widows of men
who died as a result of Chernobyl receive death benefits from the Ukrainian government.
- Ian Fairlie, a radiation biologist who co-authored The
Other Report on Chernobyl (TORCH, 2006)[4] explained that the WHO and the IAEA work closely with the Nuclear
industry: “the WHO and IAEA control the science and dictate the agenda at very senior levels. And they
predetermine what line they would take.” Dr. Fairlie estimated that 600,000,000 of the European population
was exposed to radiation.
- In 2009, the Annals New York Academy of Sciences published a translation of a book by Russian scientists in
Vol. 1181of its Annals.
Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and
the Environment. The lead author, Alexey V. Yablokov, a biologist was a member of the
Russian Academy of Science. The Russian scientists estimated that, based on the available medical data by
2004, the death toll worldwide as a result of the Chernobyl disaster, was 985,000. The populations most
exposed include: 830,000 Clean-up workers (liquidators); 350,400 Evacuees from the 30 km zone; and 8,300,000
people in the heavily irradiated zones in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. The authors based their analysis on
1,000 published titles and over 5,000 internet and printed publications, primarily in Slavic
languages.Stakeholders invested in the atomic energy industry attacked the NY Academy for publishing a book
that they characterized as: “spreading fear, uncertainty and doubt about the use of nuclear energy.”
The WHO went so far as to issue a false claim that the NY Academy had repudiated the book and had withdrawn
it. The Academy did no such thing; the book stands.
This report notes that: “Disease/health damage is to be expected as a result of
additional exposure to radiation because of Chernobyl. Thus, it should be noted that the latency period for many
types of cancer is 25 – 30 years. At present we are only just seeing cases of thyroid cancers, breast cancers and
brain tumours in the exposed population. But liquidators have also developed cancer in numerous other
organs: the prostate gland, stomach, cancer of the blood,
thyroid cancer. Genetic changes: malformations, stillbirths, the lack of children, and non-cancerous diseases.
Many organ systems could be affected; brain disorders; accelerated aging process; psychological
disorders.”
- In 2015, the International Journal of Health Servicespublished an article
by Dr. Alison Rosamund Katz summarizing the coordinated IAEA-WHO cover-up:[5]
“Six decades of a high-level, institutional, and internationally coordinated cover-up have deprived the
world’s people of critically important medical and scientific information about the health consequences of
nuclear activities, industrial, and military.
Following decades of an internationally coordinated cover-up, critical information about the health
consequences of the Chernobyl accident, worldwide but particularly in Western and Eastern Europe, was made
available through Volume 1181 of the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. The book also contains unique,
valuable data from the 3 most affected counties, and it suggests that consequences of the Chernobyl accident
are far more serious than has been acknowledged. Many health problems are worsening, including those resulting
from irreversible genetic damage. Given the threat that such information represents to the nuclear
establishment, it was predictable that Volume 1181, of far higher scientific quality than the United Nations’
flagship report The Chernobyl Forum, would meet with violent criticism.
Since its publication in 2009, it has been misrepresented and discredited by the nuclear establishment
and international health establishment – to the extent of making the absurd and false claim that the New York
Academy of Sciences has in some way disowned its own publication. The New York Academy of Sciences defends
publication of Volume 1181 on the grounds of its commitment to open discussion of scientific material and
publication of material of scientific value.”
- In 2019, the BBC report The True Toll of the
Chernobyl Disaster, based on the findings of Dr. Viktor Sushko, Deputy Director General of the National
Research Centre for Radiation Medicine in Kiev, Ukraine, confirmed that: “the Chernobyl disaster is the largest anthropogenic disaster in the history of humankind.”
In 2018, a German documentary by Lilian Franck,
TrustWHO revealed how the WHO’s financial dependence for its stream of funding
has ensured that its policies and activities do not interfere with the business of powerful industrial countries
and multi-national corporations that provide the major portion of the WHO’s funds.
In 2009, WHO Director General, Dr. Chan declared the flu (H1N1 “Swine
Flu”) “a pandemic”
- She declared a pandemic in the absence of any evidence of a severe,
life-threatening, rapidly spreading illness. Nevertheless, she declared a preposterous estimate that 2 billion
people would be infected and millions would die.
- Wolfgang Wodarg, former delegate to the European Council describes how vaccine manufacturers had launched new
production programs to produce vaccines for a flu pandemic for governments to purchase and stockpile. However,
their global marketing plan could only be implemented without a declared pandemic by the WHO.
- A meeting by WHO officials and the European Scientific Working group on Influenza (ESWI) provided the
“scientific” mantle for calling to action preparedness against a non-existent influenza pandemic. The ESWI is
composed of scientists who are financed by vaccine manufacturers – Hoffmann-LaRoche, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline,
Sanofi Pasteur, Genentech, Janssen, subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, and Novarax.
- Margaret Chan obliged by changing the WHO criteria for a pandemic; “severity of illness” and the rapid spread
of infection to millions of people was eliminated as a criterion for declaring a pandemic. By declaring a mild flu,
a “pandemic” the WHO caused an international panic that helped Pharma ensure that governments around the world
would purchase and stockpile the H1N1 flu vaccine in preparation for a fictitious flu pandemic.
The H1N1 vaccine deal was struck behind closed doors.
Even, Dr. German Velasquez, then Special Advisor for Health and Development of Drugs for Neglected Diseases
Institute, and the Director of the WHO Secretariat of the Department of Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual
Property at the Director General Office, was denied entry to the private meeting between WHO officials and Pharma
representatives who worked out the deal. Her estimate that billions of people would be infected, fomented a global
hysteria.
- The media sounded the alarm repeatedly; everyone was terrified about the coming
catastrophe.
“To understand the kind of pressure and stress the statesand the ministries of health were
put under, you need to realize thatnot to buy the vaccines could easily, because of the close links
betweenthe industry and the press, mean the fall of a whole government.” [2]
- The hysteria, about a fictitious pandemic, garnered flu vaccine manufacturers $18
billion.
The hysteria, however, did not resonate with the WHO staff. Dr.
Velasquez, noted that: “No one at the Who was afraid. I don’t know of anyone at the WHO who got
vaccinated, including the Secretary General, Margaret Chan, who stated that she hadn’t time to get
vaccinate.” [TrustWHO]
In fact, there were only 331 cases of influenza in 11 countries, with 10 deaths.
- In 2010, representatives from governments all over the world, who had spent billions of dollars for
unnecessary H1N1 vaccine stock piles, as well international organizations, all agreed that the WHO had caused an
international panic and health disaster by declaring the mild H1N1“Swine flu” to be a pandemic that was threatening
mankind.
- The Council of Europe issued a
critical report in which it pointed to the WHO partnership with the pharmaceutical industry as the true
cause of all the trouble.[6]Forbes also excoriated the WHO: “The World Health Organization
has suddenly gone from crying “The sky is falling!” like a cackling Chicken Little to squealing like a stuck
pig. The reason: charges that the agency deliberately fomented swine flu hysteria.”
- Even within the agency, the director of the WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology in Munster, Germany,
Dr. Ulrich Kiel, hasessentially
labeledthe pandemic a hoax. “We are witnessing a gigantic misallocation of
resources[$18
billionso far] in terms of public health.”[7]
- However, the Swine flu debacle, and the aggressive promotion of the H1N1 vaccine (Pandemrix, manufactured by
GlaxoSmithKline) caused thousands of people to suffer from a wide range of serious adverse effects that were
concealed from the public. [7A BMJ]
- Serious adverse effects include systemic muscle pain, Bell’s palsy, neuritis, chronic pain, paraesthesia,
inflammatory bowel disease, and narcolepsy a chronic neurological disease that especially affected adolescents.
However, leading medical journals refused to publish scientists’ reports of their finding serious health hazardous
following vaccination
- As is the norm when safety hazards involve pharmaceutical products, nine years had passed before the public
learned about the serious hazards posed by the H1N1 flu vaccine. The evidence of serious hazards including deaths,
was uncovered during the discovery process of a lawsuit against GSK. [7A]
- The GSK documents reveal that the Pandemrix vaccine caused a large number of serious adverse events during
clinical trials, including anaphylaxis, convulsions, and deaths.
In the documentary, TrustWHO,
Gaudenz Silberschmidt, WHO Director for Partnerships dismissed questions about the absence of independent
checks and balances to ensure that the WHO guidelines were based on credible science. He invoked the
inviolability of WHO authority, and claimed that: “it is not possible to have an external, independent
review of the science that the WHO relies on, because who is to say, their review is reliable, or the review
of the review is reliable?”
WHO Opioid Prescribing Guidelines Promoted the Expanded Use of
Opioids
WHO Guidelines Served as Marketing Material for Purdue Pharmaceutical
WHO Guidelines Increased Opioid Addiction Globally & Deaths
The details of the collaboration of the WHO and opioid manufacturers were uncovered in company documents during
the discovery phase of lawsuits against Purdue in the U.S. These documents reveal that when Purdue crafted their
aggressive opioid marketing in the 1990s, part of Purdue’s marketing strategy was to deceive doctors about the
addictive properties of OxyContin, and to keep patients on the drug for longer and longer periods.
Purdue’s marketing of OxyContin followed Big Pharma’s modus operandi – as describe by Dr. Sergio
Sismondo in his book, Ghost-Managed
Medicine (2018). A U.S.
Senate report – Fueling an Epidemic,[8] documented the millions of dollars that Purdue and the other opioid manufacturers –
Janssen (Johnson & Johnson), Mylan, Depomed, and Insys – paid to 14 patient advocacy organizations and
professional societies between 2012 and 2017; thereby securing their support.[9]
The
Senate report documents how the pharmaceutical industry transformed physician and patient organizations
into front groups that promoted its opioid products – regardless of the extreme harm they caused. These “advocates”
enabled Purdue to market its misinformation subversively; encouraging physicians to overcome “opiophobia” – i.e.,
hesitancy or reluctance to use opioids. These “advocates” promoted policies favorable to unrestricted opioid use,
and criticized government prescribing guidelines. They have often supported opioid industry interests at the
expense of their own constituencies. The report documents how these ostensibly neutral advocacy organizations
opposed efforts to minimize the risk of opioid addiction.
“at the very least, [the evidence suggests]a direct link between corporate donations and the advancement
of opioids friendly messaging. By aligning medical culture with industry goals in this way, many of the groups
described in this report may have played a significant role in creating the necessary conditions for the U.S.
opioids epidemic.
The recent U.S.
Congressional Report –
Corrupting Influence: Purdue & WHO (2019)[10] lays bare the pivotal, aggressive, and long-term role played by the WHO, to
influence physicians beyond the U.S. to expand their opioid prescribing. The WHO was recruited quite early to
provide credibility to recommendations that expanded the use of opioids.
According to the Congressional Report, the WHO Collaborating Centre for Policy and Communications in Cancer Care
at the University of Wisconsin Pain & Policy Studies Group revealed that from 1999 to 2010, it had accepted
over $1.6 million from Purdue. The WHO began to seek input on the formulation of its guidelines in 2007 and 2008,
when it sought the input of organizations known to have financial relationships with the opioid industry, ensuring
a pro-opioid industry bias to its report. Foremost among these industry-funded organizations is the International
Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), which has chapters such as the European Federation of IASP and the Latin
American Federation of ISP. IASP funded the WHO guidelines.
The WHO collected industry-supported opioid information feedback which was incorporated into its updated opioid
guidelines. The WHO collected the information in the form of a Delphi Study whose methodology relied on reaching a
consensus among participants. In other words, the WHO was formulating a uniform pro-opioid propaganda narrative
that promoted the expanded use for opioids, hence an expanded market for Purdue, its international arm Mundipharma,
and Endo Pharmaceuticals. This guideline was the basis for the later WHO document, Ensuring Balance in National
Policies on Controlled Substances: Guidance for Availability and Accessibility of Controlled
Medicines (2011).
As Congresswoman Katherine Clark, a co-author of the report, noted:
“The web of influence we uncovered paints a picture of a public health organization that has been
manipulated by the opioid industry. The WHO appears to be lending the opioid industry its voice and credibility,
and as a result, a trusted public health organization is trafficking dangerous misinformation that could lead to a
global opioid epidemic. [The company’s] exponential increase in opioid sales and profits
documented that their marketing strategies worked. Trusted public health organizations convinced doctors that
opioids were safe and effective.”
These collaborating interconnected front groups helped to make OxyContin the profitable blockbuster drug that
has addicted millions, ravaged communities and killed tens of thousands of people. The Congressional report shows
that the WHO was a central player who worked in concert to promote higher opioid prescribing rates.
The American Pain Society and its global arm, International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP);
International Children’s Palliative Care Network; the Mayday Fund; International Association for Hospice &
Palliative Care; U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee, Open Society Foundations; Willem Scholten, of the International
Drug Policy Consortium; Richard
Payne of Duke University, who chairs the Center for Practical Bioethics, has numerous financial ties to
drug companies,[11]and former president of the American Pain Society; Russell Portenoy, MD, Chief Medical Officer
& Director of the Metropolitan Jewish Health System (MJHS), the largest in the NY region; Hospice and
Palliative Care in New York; Kathleen Foley, MD, neurologist at
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
The Congressional report notes: “We know that one key to Purdue’s (and the entire
opioid industry’s) success in the United States was their strategy of funding organizations, people, and
research that promoted the company’s marketing goals. We have discovered that many of these same actors are
directly affiliated with the work of the WHO.”
- In 2011, the WHO published its revised opioid guideline: Ensuring Balance in National Policies on
Controlled Substances. The WHO promoted Purdue’s false claim that dependence occurs in less than one
percent of patients. The WHO disregarded the evidence of the serious public health hazard of OxyContin and opioid
addiction, and promoted Purdue’s ruthless three-pronged marketing strategy. That strategy, laid out in company
documents, eliminated step two from its earlier guideline which had recommended to keep the opioid dose low by
combining opioids with non-opioid drugs like Tylenol.
- The WHO assured physicians that: “Opioid analgesics, if prescribed in accordance with established
dosage regimens, are known to be safe and there is no need to fear accidental death or
dependence.”
- This was an outright deception contradicted by the overwhelming evidence. As the Congressional report
notes:
- “a review of the WHO guidelines makes it clear that the ‘problem’ the WHO seems to be addressing is not
how to limit the use of these highly addictive drugs, but rather how to eliminate barriers to their use.”
- By the time WHO crafted the new opioid guideline, opioid deaths and emergency treatment for overdosing had
skyrocketed: the devastation was in plain sight. Nevertheless, the new WHO guideline recommendations followed
Purdue’s opioid prescribing guidelines. The Congressional Report–
Corrupting Influence: Purdue & WHO — notes:
- “When viewed through the lens of the opioid crisis in the United States, [the WHO guideline]
Ensuring Balance’s recommendations are shocking”.
-“The WHO appears to conclude that prescription opioids are safe and effective; that
countries should avoid policies that limit or discourage their use; and that no restrictions should be placed on
their strength or length of use.
- In 2012, the WHO followed up with an even more shocking, medically irresponsible, promotional
opioid guideline for physicians: Pharmacological Treatment of Persisting Pain in Children with Medical
Illnesses. In this revision of its previous Guideline — that had focused on children with cancer — the
WHO adopted Purdue’s marketing term “opiophobia” to disparage physician’s reluctance to use opioids because of
their addictive nature, calling it an “unreasonable fear”. The WHO assured doctors that opioids were perfectly safe
for children, and that “there is no specific or maximum dose of opioids.”
“Rather than acknowledge the highly addictive nature of opioids, the WHO insinuates that providers and
families are simply ignorant of the benefits of opioid medicines. Persisting Pain in Children contains some
eerily similar recommendations to Purdue’s own materials. For instance: The claim that there
is no maximum dose of opioids is a central piece of Purdue’s marketing strategy.”
“the medical community already recognized that higher doses of opioids are not more effective in relieving
chronic pain, and that higher doses of opioids significantly raise the risks of overdose and death.”
Indeed, the deceptive assurances by the WHO to physicians were made despite the fact that US public health
agencies had determined that fatal overdoses in adults had skyrocketed when they were prescribed more than 90
morphine milligram per day. The WHO acknowledges that every recommendation is based on “low” or “very low” quality
of evidence. Yet, despite the low quality of evidence, the WHO emphasizes that all of the
recommendations in the Children’s Guidelines are intended to be followed “unequivocally” and that clinicians must
adhere to these recommendations. As the authors of
Corrupting Influence: Purdue & WHO state:
“In other words, the WHO is unambiguously recommending that highly addictive opioids should be available
to children even though they openly recognize that there is little evidence to support that recommendation, and
that any further research on the topic would ‘likely’ change the suggested course of action. Finally, in the
ultimate act of deference to Purdue’s marketing strategy, Persisting Pain in Children makes a dramatic change
to the WHO’s three-step analgesic ladder for the treatment of pain. It replaces the three-step model with a
two-step approach by completely eliminating the recommendation to use weaker combination opioids — the drugs
Purdue identified as their primary competition. The WHO recommends moving a child from non-opioids such as
NSAIDs and Tylenol straight to strong opioids with no intermediary step. Purdue could not have hoped for a
better outcome.”
The global expansion of the catastrophic opioid crisis can be laid at the door of the WHO; its leadership
delivered to Purdue the highest return for Purdue’s financial support.
-When viewed through the lens of the opioid crisis in the United States, the WHO
recommendations in Persisting Pain in Children are shocking.
***************
Ebola outbreak in West Africa reached crisis proportions in
2014
An Ebola outbreak in 2013, reached crisis proportions before the WHO declared it to be an international public
health emergency; eventually infecting 28,000 people and killing 11,000. The countries affected included, Guinea,
Liberia and Sierra Leone. By failing to take action until the end of 2014, the WHO betrayed its mission and caused
the death of thousands of people.
Independent Panel on Ebola
A panel, made up of 20 experts in global health from around
the world, was chaired by Prof Peter Piot, director of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine, who is the co-discoverer of the Ebola virus. The panel was co-sponsored by the
Harvard Global Health Institute.
The panel determined that the WHO had failed to meet its responsibilities because of a lack of leadership and
accountability. Prof. Piot stated: “Major reform of national and global systems to respond to epidemics are not
only feasible, but also essential so that we do not witness such depths of suffering, death and social and economic
havoc in future epidemics.”
And Ashishs Jha, Professor of Medicine and the director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, said:
“The Ebola crisis has laid bare the inadequacy of the global response. We need a thorough, careful
analysis of what went wrong, and how we might do better in the future.People at WHO were aware
that there was an Ebola outbreak that was getting out of control by spring… and yet it took until August to
declare a public health emergency. The cost of the delay was enormous.”BBC
The panel determined that “The reputation and credibility of the WHO has suffered a particularly fierce
blow.” The panel’s final report was published in The Lancet in 2015.[12]
The culpability of the WHO leadership is further underscored in numerous articles. For example, in Medical
History, 2017:
“as shown by [Secretary General of the WHO] Chan’s rapid declaration of a pheic [Public Health Emergency
of International Concern] in relation to H1N1 swine flu in 2009 and polio in 2014, senior WHO officials could
have chosen to override these bureaucratic procedures. That they chose not to is testimony to the extent to
which by 2014 Ebola had become an object of medical and political neglect. Unlike polio, Ebola did not threaten
to undermine long-standing WHO programmes and investments in disease eradication. Nor were there vaccines and
drugs ready for deployment to the Ebola zone. On the contrary, research into promising investigational Ebola
products had ceased to be a priority.” [13]
Another article, in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B Biological Science,
2017:
“The WHO’s reputation has become irrefutably damaged by the Ebola outbreak, with the general consensus
in the global health community that it fell short of its leadership responsibilities…the WHO’s
role during the outbreak suggests that the disease outbreak demonstrates the tension that exists between the
organization’s normative and operational roles in health crises. While the WHO did offer some
normative leadership, it did not provide an effective operational response. This division between the normative
and operational was further highlighted by the discrepancy between what the global community expects the WHO to
do in a health emergency, and what it is able to do with its financial and organizational constraints.
None of the WHO activities provided direct patient care, strategic managerial oversight or the infection
control that the outbreak response needed. It is apparent that the global community also expected an
operational response from the WHO. However, as the WHO was unable to provide this on-the-ground response in
West Africa.. due to a vacuum of international leadership in the operational response (which several in the
international community expected the WHO to perform), the patient care, infection control and management were
left to others, notably Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), militaries and UNMEER to perform this
functionsThese efforts offered the global community further ammunition for their WHO
criticisms.”[14]
In 2017, The
Associated Press obtained internal WHO documents and published an exposé about the astronomical
travel expenditures by officials of the WHO. Whereas other international aid agencies, such as Doctors Without
Borders, with a staff of about 37,000 aid workers, spend about $43 million on travel a year, the WHO, with a staff
of 7,000 spends more than $200 million annually.
AP reported that:
“During the Ebola disaster in West Africa, WHO’s travel costs spiked to $234 million. Although experts
say on-the-ground help was critical, some question whether the agency couldn’t have shaved its costs so more
funds went to
West Africa . The three countries that bore the brunt of the outbreak couldn’t even afford
basics such as protective boots, gloves and soap for endangered medical workers or body bags for the thousands
who died.
- Dr. Bruce Aylward, who directed WHO’s outbreak response, racked up nearly $400,000 in travel expenses
during the Ebola crisis, sometimes flying by helicopter to visit clinics instead of traveling by jeep over muddy
roads, according to internal trip reports he filed.
- Dr. Chan spent more than $370,000 in travel that year, as documented in a confidential 25-page analysis of WHO
expenses that identified the agency’s top 50 spenders. Aylward and Chan were first and second on that list. WHO
declined requests for an interview with Chan; Aylward did not immediately respond to a request for
comment.
“Three sources who asked not to be identified for fear of losing their jobs told the AP that Chan often
flew in first class…There’s a huge inequality between the people at the top who are getting
helicopters and business class, and everyone else who just has to make do,” said Sophie Harman, an expert in
global health politics at Queen Mary University in London.”
“When you spend the kind of money WHO is spending on travel, you have to be able to justify it,”
Dr. Ashish Jha, director of the Global Health Institute at Harvard University, said. “I can’t think of any
justification for ever flying first class.”
It is difficult to fathom why – other than financial self-interest — the WHO leadership
decided to declare a “Swine Flu” pandemic when none existed. Yet, the same leadership delayed declaring Ebola a
pandemic, or to properly address the human needs as the catastrophe spread. The failure by WHO officials to raise
the alarm and take action resulted in a mounting body count of West African people; the human casualties reached
11,000. The WHO leadership is focused on Big Pharma’s drug and vaccine marketing agenda which the WHO endorses and
vigorously promotes. The Ebola pandemic, at that time provided no opportunity for Pharma, inasmuch as the industry
had nothing to sell; so the WHO failed to take action. but did manage to travel luxuriously. One cannot but reach
the conclusion that Black people’s lives don’t matter to officials of the WHO.
This is Part 1 of a series about the WHO.
See: Part 2: PhRMA & WHO Global Strategic Immunization Agenda 2030
Part 2: Scientists at WHO Summit Confirm the Truth About Vaccine Safety Problems
Rock-SOLID Proof Trump is Working WITH Bill Gates to INJECT
AMERICA!!
HighImpactFlix | First published at 13:24 UTC on May 1st, 2020.
If you're "IN CHARGE" or "FAST TRACKING" the "FINAL SOLUTION," you're NOT working AGAINST....but
WITH Bill (GLOBALIST, EUGENICIST) Gates and AGAINST America...and the World. THAT is what "Operation Warp Speed" is
all about. Change my mind.
Trump Admin Commits
Billions
To Gates-Founded Vaccine Alliance
As Millions Pulled From WHO, Trump Admin Commits Billions To
Gates-Founded Vaccine Alliance
The Last American Vagabond | First published at
23:41 UTC on July 6th, 2020.
Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated
to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24
hours.
TheConsciousResistance | First published at 00:07
UTC on July 11th, 2020.
Derrick Broze checks in to discuss his recent
controversial video/article on the Trump administration's relationship with Bill Gates and Gates
related organizations.
Fear and Centralization of
Power: A Disaster
in the Making for Liberty
Tenth Amendment Center | 3/27/20
We can't say we weren't warned. Fear is the foundation, and politicians and bureaucrats use that
fear to centralize and expand their own power. 10 timeless quotes from the Founders and old Revolutionaries
Path to Liberty, Fast Friday Edition: March 27, 2020
As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious
diseases (HCID) in the UK.
The 4 nations public health HCID group made an interim recommendation in
January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID. This was based on consideration of the UK
HCID criteria about the virus and
the disease with information available during the early stages of the outbreak. Now that more
is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date
information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that
several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality
rates (low overall), and there is now greater clinical awareness and a
specific and sensitive laboratory test, the availability of which continues to increase.
The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) is also of the opinion that COVID-19
should no longer be classified as an HCID.
Cases of COVID-19 are no longer managed by HCID treatment centres only. All healthcare
workers managing possible and confirmed cases should follow the
updated national infection and prevention (IPC) guidance for COVID-19, which supersedes all
previous IPC guidance for COVID-19.
This guidance includes instructions about different personal protective equipment
(PPE) ensembles that are appropriate
for different clinical scenarios.
Mike Robinson and Patrick Henningsen with today's UK Column News.
|To take part in live chat please join us here:https://www.ukcolumn.org/community/live
Notes:
99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness, Italy Says
-By Tommaso Ebhardt, Chiara Remondini, and Marco
BertaccheMarch 18, 2020, 5:56 AM PDT
It's silent. Invisible. It's spreading everywhere. It's going to kill us all. We have to take
extraordinary measures to combat it. Coronavirus? No, silly! CO2. But it's not me making the comparison. Find out
what the climate schemers and technocrat dreamers have in mind for humanity, and how it's reflected in the
post-virus world in this week's edition of #PropagandaWatch.
The Common Roots Of Climate Change And COVID-19 Hysteria
Look Into It | Apr 15, 2020
Technocracy News & Trends for Monday, March 30, 2020
People want to know: just how bad is the COVID-19 virus and is fighting it worth the destruction of
the world’s economic and financial system while disrupting the lives of hundreds of millions of people? The story
behind the story will make it clear that things are seldom as they seem.
In short and when seen through the lens of Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy, the whole
world has just been punked and then panicked into destroying itself over COVID-19.
Drs. Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx should be tried as criminal conspirators who willfully
collaborated in a mass deception that shutdown the U.S. economy, stole over 35 million jobs from the American
people, deceived physicians and the entire medical industry into lying about the true threat (or lack thereof) of
corona and ultimately took (and are still taking) the lives of countless thousands of innocent
Americans.
These deaths are directly due to
the denial of medical care for non-corona illnesses (including cancer and heart disease) and the fear
imposed on people—both physicians and patients—which resulted in doctors taking extended vacations for fear of
contracting corona from their patients and fearful patients refusing to go to hospitals and doctors' offices. Not
to mention, the escalating numbers of deaths from suicide resulting from the devastation of this medically imposed
tyranny. Every job is "essential" when you rely on it for your living.
We now know that Fauci and Birx
used a scam pandemic model from the Imperial College in London authored by recently disgraced Professor Neil
Ferguson to persuade President Trump to lock down the entire U.S. economy and begin an avalanche of State shutdowns
of businesses, schools, churches, etc., all across America.
The Imperial College Model has now been exposed as "completely unusable for
scientific purposes." In other words, it was a total sham.
Here are bullet points from the
report:
** Dr. Tony Fauci and Dr. Deborah
Birx used the Imperial College Model to persuade President Trump to lock down the ENTIRE US ECONOMY.
** The fraudulent model predicted
2.2 million American deaths from the coronavirus pandemic.
** The authors of the Imperial
College Model shared their findings with the White House Coronavirus task force in early March.
** Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx then met
with President Trump privately and urged him to shut down the US economy and destroy the record Trump economy
based on this model.
** A new critique of the Imperial
College Model finds the study is “completely unusable for scientific purposes” — The Imperial College study is a
complete sham.
** Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx pushed a
garbage model on the White House and the American public and destroyed the US economy.
The report concludes:
Ferguson’s model was complete
trash.
Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx ran with it
anyway — without any facts or comparisons. They never got a second opinion!
Now we are facing massive
unemployment and poverty.
It needs to be asked: Will Dr.
Fauci and Dr. Birx face prison time for their colossal mistake?
In conclusion: Dr. Birx and Dr.
Fauci misled the White House and the American public.
The economy is destroyed and over
30 million Americans have lost their incomes.
Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx should
resign immediately and face criminal charges for defrauding the US government and American public.
Also read this report that further puts the spotlight on Neil Ferguson’s
(Professor Panic’s) sham computer model that was used by Fauci and Birx to scare America into surrendering the
Bill of Rights and virtually everything we hold dear—including the freedom of worship.
From the report:
‘[Neil Ferguson’s model] is such a
joke it is either an outright fraud, or it is the most inept piece of programming I have ever seen in my life .
. . This is the most unprofessional operation perhaps in computer science. The entire team should be disbanded
and an independent team put in place to review the work of Neil Ferguson . . . The only reasonable conclusion I
can reach is that this has been deliberately used to justify bogus forecasts intent for political activism . . .
There seems to have been no independent review of Ferguson’s work, which is unimaginable!’
My friend Dr. Don Boys recently wrote a column questioning whether the CDC, rather than being a
guardian of national health, is actually a vaccine company, as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. charges. Boys asks:
But is it [the CDC’s purpose]
prevention of disease or is it to prevent taxpayers from knowing the connection, collusion, corruption, and
conspiracy with the vastly wealthy pharmaceutical companies, vaccine producers, and universities?
I’ll answer the question: The
latter is EXACTLY the purpose of the CDC.
To illustrate: Despite knowing that
the computer model that Fauci and Birx (and Trump) have been using to inflict all of this fear and paranoia over
corona is a big fat scam, in order to keep the phony narrative going, the CDC continues to report deaths from
corona that are egregiously exaggerated—even to the point of manipulation and deception.
For
example, the CDC’s own website dated May 15, 2020 (the CDC often updates the stats on this page,
of course, but the numeric comparisons I’m making here stay the same) reported corona deaths at 60,299. Deaths
with pneumonia, influenza or Covid-19 were reported to be 120,370. Deaths with pneumonia alone were reported to
be 81,318. Deaths from influenza alone were reported to be 6,158.
But if you subtract pneumonia
deaths (81,318) and influenza deaths (6,158) from 120,370, you come up with 32,894 corona deaths. Yet, the CDC
hypes the number at being almost double that amount at 60,299.
And never forget that
the CDC has instructed physicians to assume corona deaths on death certificates without any
testing or knowledge that the deceased actually died from corona. Hence, we know that any numbers we are given
regarding corona deaths are exaggerated. The only thing we don’t know is how MUCH they are exaggerated. The
CDC’s own stats suggest that reported corona deaths are at least double the true figure. And I personally
believe that reported corona deaths are exaggerated even more than that.
But one hint of these fudged
statistics is the CDC report of 6,158 deaths from influenza for the months of February through May 15. That’s 3 ½
months or well over half of the peak months of seasonal flu deaths.
Over the past 9 years, influenza
has killed on average almost 40,000 Americans annually. Yet during over half of the peak months of the 2019/2020
flu season (the exact months coinciding with the coronavirus), the CDC is reporting only 6,000 flu deaths? This
figure defies all reason and logic. The ONLY way this stat makes any sense is that tens of thousands of people who
died from the flu this year were listed as dying from corona in order to maintain the false narrative begun by
Ferguson, Fauci, Birx and Trump.
Plus, several reports are beginning
to surface regardingthe lack of reported deaths from heart attacks. During the past couple of months, coinciding
with the Covid “pandemic,” heart doctors are reporting 60% (and more) reductions in hospital admissions for
heart failure. 60%!!! Plus, acute appendicitis and acute gallbladder disease emergencies are also down
significantly.
Again, this defies reality. All of
these diseases have not suddenly sharply decreased at the very time that the coronavirus is spiraling
upward.
The obvious reason for this
phenomenon is that people suffering from these other diseases have been scared out of their minds by all of the
corona hysteria and are not seeking medical care (or are being denied medical care). I wonder how many people who
died from these other diseases at home were listed as dying from corona.
And make no mistake about it: The
endgame is forced vaccinations and the utter annihilation of our Natural liberties protected in the Bill of
Rights.
Those who think the government is
planning on forcing every American to inject themselves with a coronavirusvaccine may have just received an indication confirming their fears. That’s
because a recent press release from the US Department of Defense revealed that the Department
of Defense (DoD) is partnering with Health and Human Services (HHS) to purchase 500 million ApiJect vaccine
injection devices. Deliveries are scheduled to begin in October of this year. (Source)
Writing for
AmericanThinker.com, Peter Barry Chowka is even more direct:
The reports during the past two
days that President Trump has engaged the military in a project calledOperation Warp Speed to fast track a Covid-19 vaccine – which is being compared to the World War Two Manhattan Project to develop a nuclear weapon –
feels like the final blow. It has taken the wind out of my sails that America can be made great – aka
pre-coronavirus panic – ever again.
President Trump’s promise of a
vaccine yesterday implies words like mandate, monitoring, andimmunity passports. Contact tracing and tens of thousands of new government workers to spy on and enforce compliance with that
unproven strategy which came out of nowhere last month were bad enough. Now we have the next and possibly the
final chapter: A new medical mandate enforced by the military that will make Obamacare’s onerous individual health insurance mandate seem like child’s play.
Chowka quotes Mike Adams’ very
realistic analysis:
Don’t forget that this is being
married with President Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” which aims to bypass all the usual protocols of vaccine
safety testing and clinical trials, delivering up to 300 million coronavirus vaccine doses before the end of
calendar 2020….
If coronavirus vaccines were
planned to be optional — respecting the vaccine choice of individuals — not more than 100 million doses would be
needed. The fact that 500 million doses are being manufactured is an admission that the DoD and
HHSplan to make coronavirus vaccines mandatory. [emphasis original.]
I'm saying it straight out: Fauci
and Birx are criminals whose crimes are so heinous that they should spend the rest of their lives in
prison.
And never forget that Donald Trump
was the one who gave Fauci and Birx the platform to trumpet their sham science. Trump is the one who called for a
nationwide lockdown of our economy, our communities, our businesses, our schools and our churches. And it is Donald
Trump who has selected the U.S. military to spearhead the distribution of corona vaccinations to every person in
America.
At this point and forward, anyone
who continues to cover for—or make excuses for—Donald Trump is a willing participant in the destruction of
America.
This is no longer about choosing a
lesser evil. This is about the survival of our republic in 2020—before we even have a chance to vote for a lesser
evil. This is about America’s survival RIGHT NOW.
Along with forced vaccinations come
universal tracking, forced internments, medical certificates as a requirement to work, board a plane, go to school
and attend public events—perhaps even church. In other words, America will be turned into a western version of
Communist China.
And the man who is making it happen
is Donald Trump.
Fauci and Birx should go to prison
for the rest of their lives. And Donald Trump needs to be shipped to Tel Aviv to share a jail cell with Benjamin
Netanyahu. And every politician in Washington, D.C. (Democrat and Republican), that went along with this
Machiavellian masquerade to enslave and bankrupt our country should be tarred and feathered and put on a slow boat
to China: the country into which they are trying to turn America.
*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing
audience, donations may be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:
A Contagion Of Fear, Cont: In this message Pastor Baldwin reviews the history of
the coronavirus. He reviews the fact that globally the mortality rate of the virus is less than 1%.
He reviews the fact that over 80% of people contracting the virus have "mild" symptoms. He reviews
the fact that we are MANY times more likely to die from a car accident, cardiac disease, an
accidental fall or even choking to death on food than we are from the coronavirus.
The main point of this message is to remind Christians that people who are filled
with the Holy Spirit cannot be filled with the spirit of fear. Pastor Baldwin reminds Christian
brethren that we are not in this world to live for ourselves, but for Christ--and that our life's
goal should be to glorify Christ in our bodies, whether it be by life or by death.
Pastor Baldwin also shows how this manufactured virus scare is greatly augmenting
the Welfare State, the Police State, socialist politicians and Big Pharma. Sadly, many so-called
patriot bloggers and broadcasters are also fomenting fear--and cashing in on the profits of
fear-mongering.
The Bible commands us to FEAR NOT, STAND UP and TRUST GOD.
You'll even hear Pastor Baldwin sing in this message. (Smiley Face)
To purchase a copy of this message or to support the fellowship, please visit
LibertyFellowshipMT.com.
COVID 19: A Pretext
For Civil Tyranny And An Opportunity For Christian
Toughness
LibertyFellowshipMT | Mar. 22, 2020
Montana physician Dr. Annie Bukacek
discusses how COVID 19 death certificates Are Being Manipulated
LibertyFellowshipMT - Apr. 5, 2020
Dr. Bukacek is a longtime Montana physician with over 30 years' experience practicing medicine.
Signing death certificates is a routine part of her job.
In this brief video, Dr. Bukacek blows the whistle on the way the CDC is instructing physicians to
exaggerate COVID 19 deaths on death certificates.
At the height of the government’s coronavirus lies and lockdowns, 30-year veteran
physician, Dr. Ann Bukacek, stood at the podium of Liberty Fellowship and exposed the gross exaggeration of corona death certificates that
were being encouraged by the CDC as a way of manipulating public perception regarding the nature and extent of
the virus. She used the CDC’s own statements to prove her assertions.
For daring to tell the truth about
the coronavirus and the CDC’s hype and fearmongering over the virus, a tsunami of hate, vitriol and personal and
media attacks were hurled at this respected physician (she has been votedBest Family
Physician in the county two years running and three times overall) at a level most of us cannot imagine.
Even many of her peers in the medical profession attacked her mercilessly—some even threatened to get her license
revoked. She didn’t flinch. She has more courage than most men you will ever meet.
Well, hold onto your seats. A
recent report published by the CDC itself totally vindicates Dr. Bukacek and, at the same time, indicts itself. For
the most part, of course, the mainstream media is ignoring the report.
Dr. Annie Bukacek of Kalispell did
her best to try warning Montanans that the death rate of COVID-19 was being stretched and contorted by
misleading death certificates. In the article, Montana Doctor Blows the Whistle on the CDC’s Manipulated Coronavirus Figures, the
Gazette reported Bukacek’s presentation which explained that COVID-19 was being placed on death certificates as
the cause of death merely because the deceased had tested positive for the virus and regardless of
whether or not it actually caused them to die. Bukaceks’ assertions were picked up by the national press and
joined a loud chorus of medical professionals around the nation who were insisting that the CDC’s figures were
skewed.
Largely, Bukacek was slandered in
the press in outlets like The Daily Beast, Buzzfeed, and even Rolling Stone for being an ‘anti-vaxxer’ and
‘conspiracy theorist’ who was ‘undermining COVID-19 response in Montana.’ Buzzfeed wrote of Dr. Bukacek,“In a widely circulated video posted on social media, Bukacek cast doubt over official COVID-19 death
tolls, saying medical professionals were pressured to attribute non-COVID deaths to the virus.”
For this, Montana liberals who were
prone to believe whatever was told to them by Governor Bullock and state health officials and castigate any
opposing view as a “conspiracy theory” launched a petition to oust Dr. Bukacek from the Flathead County Health
Board.
The petition to remove her, which
has roughly half the signatures than the petition to keep her, reads,“Dr Annie Bukacek has
violated public trust by putting her political and religious views ahead of science in regards to the Covid-19
outbreak.”
It turns out, Dr. Bukacek was right
all along, and her understanding of science and medicine has been vindicated in the latest report by the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention.
According to the CDC, only 6% of deaths originally reported as caused by Coronavirus
were deaths exclusively caused by Coronavirus. As Dr. Bukacek warned Montanans from the beginning, the rest of
the deaths attributed to COVID-19 were in cases in which patients tested positive, but who had other underlying
health conditions that actually caused their death.
While news outlets
all across the country are pointing out that the CDC has provided this data, showing that
COVID-19 is the exclusive or primary cause of death in only 6% of the cases (and has been inflated a whopping
1,567%), it should be noted that it doesn’t mean per se that COVID-19 didn’t have a role to play
in the other 94% of deaths. What it does mean is that patients died with or
from other ailments that are far more serious.
Essentially, what the CDC has
admitted is that those who have died from heart attacks or the flu were claimed to have died from COVID-19 on
death certificates and in CDC reporting, whether or not that was the primary cause of their death (or
necessarilya cause at all).
If Montana COVID-19 rates are
largely similar to those across the United States, this means thatapproximately six Montanans
have died exclusively from COVID-19. Meanwhile, Governor Bullock and many local health boards seem to
be unmoved by the latest scientific findings.
Did you get that? The primary cause
of death attributed to the coronavirus has been inflated by a whopping 1,567%.
And did you hear this?
“Essentially, what the CDC has admitted is that those who have died from heart attacks or the flu were claimed to
have died from COVID-19 on death certificates and in CDC reporting, whether or not that was the primary cause of
their death (or necessarilya cause at all).” That’s EXACTLY what Dr. Bukacek told us back in
April.
This local NBC news
report states that the CDC is now admitting that only 9,683 people in the U.S. have died
exclusively from the coronavirus—NOT the reputed 160,000 plus. The rest of the deaths had other serious
underlying diseases that took their lives.
Please let that sink in.
The CDC’s own report says less than 10,000 people have died exclusively from the coronavirus.
That fact is a blatant admission
that the entire CDC/WHO/medical establishment/White House/congressional/news media corona narrative has indeed been
grossly exaggerated and manipulated.
Jordan Hall, Publisher of
theMontana Daily Gazette, which was quoted above, gave an excellent summary of “The Great
Coronavirus Panic Of 2020.”
* The government response to
COVID-19 has done far more damage than the virus itself.
* Far fewer have died exclusively
from COVID-19 than is regularly reported.
* Far more have had COVID-19 than
we were led to believe.
* The so-called “experts” who
insist we listen to them have been wrong on almost everything from the beginning.
* We self-sabotaged our economy and
stripped ourselves of liberty for what amounts to a paper tiger.
* The government now has a far
better idea exactly how far they can push citizens before we push back (and it’s further than any of us
previously thought). This isn’t merely a strategy; it is a test.
* There is clearly a coordinated
effort to keep us afraid of this virus and afraid of each other in a way that far surpasses common-sense
communicable virus mitigation. The media, technocrats, and at least half of our politicians want you to remain
terrified (or should I say, terrorized).
* Masks are clearly far less
effective at preventing the spread of COVID-19 than social distancing (especially if you are sick), but almost
all the PSAs from our Nanny State focus on masks exclusively. I’d suggest this is because without masks there
would be no visible reminder in your daily life that you’re supposed to be terrified of something.
* In fact, if it weren’t for media
propaganda and the hysteria propagated by politicians, I submit to you we would not know there was a ‘pandemic’
at all. That’s right; without their fear mongering, we might have noticed nothing but a nasty respiratory bug
going around, but it would not have struck us as a particularly deadly pandemic.
Amen, Jordan!
This means it’s time for the
American people to call the bluff and throw away those worthless masks, forget those stupid social distancing
mandates and demand that their State and local authorities give the People their country back.
The CDC has lost all credibility.
There is now no doubt: The CDC is nothing but a criminal cabal of white-coated pimps working for Big Pharma.
Anthony Fauci should go to prison. Bill Gates should go to prison. The medical “experts” who regurgitated and went
along with this fraud should find other work, and the politicians and government bureaucrats who helped shut this
country down, who helped destroy millions of jobs, who helped ruin the careers of millions of people and who helped
take the homes and livelihoods of millions of Americans should be tarred and feathered and put on a slow boat to
China. And let’s not forget a president and Congress that stole over 6 trillion dollars from the American
taxpayers—two thirds of which went to their big banker buddies at the Federal Reserve.
Not only has the CDC lost
credibility, so has the U.S. medical establishment. Doctors HAD to have known that the narrative was false, but
they sacrificed their integrity and honesty and played along—they played along for BIG MONEY.
HCA Healthcare is one of the
world’s wealthiest hospital chains. It earned more than $7 billion in profits over the past two years. It is
worth $36 billion. It paid its chief executive $26 million in 2019.
But as the coronavirus swept the
country, employees at HCA repeatedly complained that the company was not providing adequate protective gear to
nurses, medical technicians and cleaning staff. Last month, HCA executives warned that they would lay off
thousands of nurses if they didn’t agree to wage freezes and other concessions.
A few weeks earlier, HCA had
received about $1 billion in bailout funds from the federal government, part of an effort to stabilize hospitals
during the pandemic.
HCA is among a long list of
deep-pocketed health care companies that have received billions of dollars in taxpayer funds but are laying off
or cutting the pay of tens of thousands of doctors, nurses and lower-paid workers. Many have continued to pay
their top executives millions, although some executives have taken modest pay cuts.
The New York Times analyzed tax and
securities filings by 60 of the country’s largest hospital chains, which have received a total of more than $15
billion in emergency funds through the economic stimulus package in the federal CARES Act.
The hospitals — including publicly
traded juggernauts like HCA and Tenet Healthcare, elite nonprofits like the Mayo Clinic, and regional chains
with thousands of beds and billions in cash — are collectively sitting on tens of billions of dollars of cash reserves that are supposed to help them
weather an unanticipated storm. And together, they awarded the five highest-paid officials at each chain about
$874 million in the most recent year for which they have disclosed their finances.
At least 36 of those hospital
chains have laid off, furloughed or reduced the pay of employees as they try to save money during the
pandemic.
Seven chains that together received
more than $1.5 billion in bailout funds — Trinity Health, Beaumont Health and the Henry Ford Health System in
Michigan; SSM Health and Mercy in St. Louis; Fairview Health in Minneapolis; and Prisma Health in South Carolina
— have furloughed or laid off more than 30,000 workers, according to company officials and local news
reports.
The bailout money, which hospitals
received from the Health and Human Services Department without having to apply for it, came with few strings
attached.
Of course, this also means that
there is absolutely NO REASON to take a corona vaccination. None. Zero. Zilch. It means Gates and Fauci are
international con men who make P.T. Barnum look like a choir boy by comparison. It means that all of these
lockdowns, shutdowns, closings and mandates were total frauds. It means the entire corona narrative is a fraud. It
also means there is something much more sinister at work here.
Planting fear, paranoia and
hysteria into the hearts and minds of millions of people over a virus that has directly taken the lives of fewer
than 10,000 people (doubtless, the true number of low corona deaths globally are similar to those in the U.S.)
betrays a massive conspiracy to scare the world into total submission and subjugation. As I have said
from the beginning: This is NOT about our health and safety; this is about our control and enslavement.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. spoke to an
enormous crowd in Berlin on Saturday, as tens of thousands of Germans joined forces to protest what Kennedy Jr.
referred to as Bill Gates’ “bio-security agenda, the rise of the authoritarian surveillance state and
the Big Pharma sponsored coup d’etat against liberal democracy.”
“The pandemic is a
crisis of convenience for the elite who are dictating these policies,” said Kennedy Jr., who praised the
huge Berlin crowd for being on the frontline of the fight against global totalitarianism.
From this point forward, anyone who
submits to this phony, fraudulent corona narrative is a willing participant in tyranny. Those who continue to go
along with this masquerade need to stop waving the flag and stop singingGod Bless America, because
they are volitionally submitting to their own subjugation. THEY ARE WILLING SLAVES.
Everyone who attacked and
besmirched Dr. Bukacek for her courageous stand should crawl on their knees and beg for her forgiveness. And those
who embraced and promoted the phony corona narrative should publicly renounce this global medical Ponzi scheme and
go to work repairing the damage that they have wreaked on our society.
*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing
audience, donations may be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:
[CHUCK BALDWIN] Published: Thursday, March 19, 2020
Does anyone remember these
words: "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself"?
Those words are from President
Franklin D. Roosevelt’s First Inaugural Address delivered on March 4, 1933. These words were spoken at the height
of the Great Depression.
My parents lived through the Great
Depression (and two World Wars). I grew up listening to their experiences of living in the Depression. For poor
people (which my parents were), the Depression was horrific. Today's Americans know nothing of suffering in the
magnitude of that terrible period of U.S. history.
And I can tell you emphatically
that at no point did my parents (or grandparents or aunts and uncles) ever show fear. Never! Neither did they
demonstrate selfishness nor panic. They spoke repeatedly of deprivation, sickness and want, but never of fear. And
selfishness was not in their vocabulary. In the worst of times, they prayed, worked and worshiped
together.
Today, there is a contagion
sweeping the country alright: It's a contagion of FEAR.
Dr. Ron Paul suggests the
coronavirus is a hoax. In a column entitled The Coronavirus Hoax, Dr. Paul said:
People are “willing to give up
freedoms for promises that the government will take care of them.”
“State and local authoritarians
love panic as well,” he continued before singling out U.S. infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci as the
“chief fearmonger of the Trump Administration.”
“Fauci is all over the media,
serving up outright falsehoods to stir up even more panic. He testified to Congress that the death rate for the
coronavirus is ten times that of the seasonal flu, a claim without any scientific basis,” Paul wrote. “Over
what? A virus that has thus far killed just over 5,000 worldwide and less than 100 in the United
States?”
“People should ask themselves
whether this coronavirus ‘pandemic’ could be a big hoax, with the actual danger of the disease massively
exaggerated by those who seek to profit – financially or politically – from the ensuing panic.”
Dr. Paul’s remarks are well taken.
If it's not a hoax, the virus IS being used as a completely exaggerated, super-hyped, super-inflated psychological
ops campaign against the American people—a coordinated full-court press of intimidation and fearmongering by the
government, the mass media and the CDC. And disgustingly, many so-called patriot bloggers and broadcasters have
also given themselves to grotesque fearmongering.
Plus, did you know that
the U.S. Marine Corps has psychological operations units and is paying individual Marines
$40,000 to transfer to these units? How do we know that these military psyops units are NOT being used against
the American people right now?
What we do know is that all of this
fearmongering has worked brilliantly. As Edmund Burke opined, "No passion so effectually robs the mind
of all its powers of acting and reasoning as fear."
A large segment of our
population—probably a majority—is in deep panic. And not only does that mean empty shelves, empty classrooms and
empty restaurants; it means empty minds. People everywhere are begging the government to protect and save
them.
Mark this down: When people are
consumed with fear, they have already surrendered their hearts and minds to tyranny.
What we are witnessing today is
Medical Martial Law.
In addition, Dr. Paul is right in
asking who is profiting from this government/media-induced panic. Who exactly is profiting from the coronavirus?
I’ll tell you: international bankers, socialist politicians, the Welfare State, Big Pharma, the Police State,
government bureaucracy, etc. I’ll say it straight out: The CDC is nothing but a professional, government-backed
lobby group for Big Pharma.
Both parties in Congress and
President Trump are pouring over one trillion taxpayer dollars for more and more government control over our lives.
And the government/media mafia is willing to totally tank the U.S. economy in the process.
Trump says that no more than 10
people should congregate. Okay, that means the U.S. House and Senate should shut down immediately. It means U.S.
military troops must shut down operations involving any unit more than squad size. It means Trump's cabinet must
immediately go home and stay home.
It means police departments must
immediately disband their shift meetings and dissolve their SWAT teams. It means the FBI, ATF, BLM, etc., must
disband all units numbering more than 10. It means the U.N. must close immediately. It means State capitals and
county governments must send home all of their clerical staff numbering over 10. And the CDC must close any
laboratory or office involving 10 or more people.
Does anyone really think any of
that is going to happen? As usual, members of government believe themselves to be above the rules and restrictions
they place on everyone else.
Tens of thousands of people die
from the flu every year, and no one panics. Over 60,000 Americans died of the flu in the 2019 flu season and over
80,000 Americans died of the flu during the 2018 flu season. That computes to more people dying from the flu—just
in America in one month alone—than have died from corona in the entire world to date.
Think of it another way: Every
year, as many or more Americans die of the flu than were killed in all of the Vietnam War. And no panic! No closed
restaurants. No empty shelves in stores. No presidential plea to stay home. No closed churches. No businesses
shutting down. No panic!
Why don’t the media tell us that
the coronavirus has been around since the 1960’s? Why don’t they tell us that 30% of common colds stem from this
virus? Why don’t they tell us that there is absolutely no way that these countries with far less medical
sophistication than the U.S. could identify the cause of all of the so-called corona deaths as being attributed to
COVID-19?
Most countries don’t have a smidgen
of test kits for COVID-19. For that matter, most of the states in the United States don’t even have sufficient test
kits for COVID-19. And many of the testing kits that have been dispensed here in America have already been
returned, because they didn’t work. So, you’re trying to tell me that all of these foreign countries have
accurately diagnosed these deaths as being from the coronavirus or COVID-19? Give me a break!
People with weakened immune systems
from other diseases are susceptible to any virus—including corona. And for some, contracting corona could be the
last straw or could lead to the last straw. But that does not mean that corona is a death sentence. Far from
it.
The next time you hear of another
reported case of “coronavirus,” remind yourself that this is most likely not COVID-19. The CDC and fearmongers in
the government and mass media want to scare us with the word “coronavirus” and make us believe that everyone who
has corona has COVID-19 and is going to die. IT JUST ISN’T SO.
This is pure fearmongering designed
to produce panic.
One absolutely cannot trust much of
the data provided by the World Health Organization and the CDC. These organizations have a vested interest in
exaggerating data to the worst case scenario, as frightening reports guarantee increased financial assistance for
these organizations from the government.
Why don’t they tell us that 80% of
people who contract corona show only “mild” symptoms? Tom Hanks and his wife were diagnosed with corona, and they
left the hospital smiling and happy just 5 days later.
The chance of someone with
symptomatic Covid-19 dying varied by age, confirming other studies. For those aged 15 to 44, the fatality rate
was 0.5%, though it might have been as low as 0.1% or as high as 1.3%. For people 45 to 64, the fatality rate
was also 0.5%, with a possible low of 0.2% and a possible high of 1.1%. For those over 64, it was 2.7%, with a
low and high estimate of 1.5% and 4.7%.
The chance of serious illness from
coronavirus infection in younger people was so low, the scientists estimate a fatality rate of zero.
A physician who is a Public Health
Medical Advisor to two Montana counties gave the following warning as to the lasting deleterious consequences that
this overreaction of fear and panic will have on our country:
During the statewide Governor’s
conference call today, a speaker said that we will never know the results of any over-reaction, but we will
certainly know the results of any under-reaction. This is not true. We will eventually have a very good idea of
the savage economic and social consequences, including deaths in economically marginal populations, of
over-reaction and panic.
Amen, doctor,
Amen!
Why don’t they tell us that the
unusually high mortality rate of the virus in Italy is due to the way that country is rationing medical care—even
denying medical care to those over 80? Why don’t they tell us that even for people over the age of 80, the COVID-19
survival rate is over 80%?
The mortality rate of the
coronavirus is only 2.9% in Hubei province, China, where Wuhan is located. In the rest of China, the mortality rate
is 0.4%. Remember the Diamond Princess cruise ship off Japan that was supposedly thoroughly infected with the
coronavirus? The mortality rate of the virus on the ship was 0.85%. Why don’t they report those facts?
You know why they don’t report
those facts. They are deliberately creating fear and panic all over the world. In order to make the
American people fall for this hype and hysteria and convince them that this is a legitimate pandemic, they had to
create fear and panic in the rest of the world first.
Even more than the financial losses
that this manufactured crisis is costing us Americans is the loss of our First Amendment liberties. Believe it or
not, there was a time in this country when liberty was more important to the American people than their lives or
their fortunes. Can anyone say Patrick Henry and the signers of our Declaration of Independence?
Those days are gone.
The government has no authority to
dictate how many people choose to congregate for any peaceful purpose. Our First Amendment states:
Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble.
Telling people to not attend church
is a violation of the constitutional clause, “prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Telling people they cannot
gather in groups of more than 10, 20, 50, etc., is a clear violation of the constitutional clause, “no law . . .
prohibiting . . . the right of the people peaceably to assemble.”
The coronavirus or any other
“emergency”—real or imagined—does NOT cancel or negate the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
That’s why I’m saying, what we are
witnessing is Medical Martial Law. It is unadulterated, unabashed government tyranny.
Know this: The Big Government,
Police State policies that are starting to take root in our country right now will be with us a long time after the
coronavirus is gone.
We have far more to fear from Big
Government tyranny than we do from any virus.
Every problem the government
touches only gets worse. And that’s exactly what’s happening right now.
You may think all of this is a
benevolent effort of a well-intentioned government and news media to help stave off a crisis. I don’t buy
it.
Corona is merely the latest
election-year medical scare to sweep America.
In 2004, it was SARS.
In 2008, it was AVIAN flu.
In 2010, it was Swine flu.
In 2012, it was MERS. In 2014, it was Ebola. In 2016, it was Zika.
In 2018, it was Ebola again.
Now in 2020, it’s Corona.
It was also Franklin D. Roosevelt
who said, “In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that
way.”
This coronavirus scare will end 1)
when the powers behind it accomplish what they want to accomplish, which always means more government and less
freedom, or 2) when the American people on the whole get tired of the government’s heavy-handed “solutions” and
say, “That’s enough!”
Personally, I vote for the second
option and wish the American people would hurry up. They have waited too long already.
One more note: It is now very
obvious that evangelical Christians will not lead any liberty charge. They are the first ones to run and hide at
the sign of danger.
We fought a War for Independence, a
War of Northern Aggression and two World Wars. We’ve endured floods, famines, wildfires, tornados, earthquakes and
hurricanes. And through it all, our Christian ancestors maintained a courageous and faithful presence in the House
of God.
When British troops were marauding
through the Colonial countryside, Christians faithfully observed the Lord’s Day together in church. I remember my
mother saying she rarely missed a church service during the Great Depression. The Sunday after Hurricane Ivan
had seriously damaged our church buildings and devastated our entire community in 2004, we held our Lord’s Day
service in the church parking lot.
In times of disaster, war and
pestilence, our Christian forebears led their communities into a stronger faith in God through their loving
devotion to united worship. Those days, too, are gone.
Now, Christians are among the first
to shut the doors of their sanctuaries, leaving a distraught public to find spiritual solace somewhere
else.
In this regard, the only Christians
Donald Trump cares about are the multimillionaire televangelists who spend their week on television fleecing the
flock instead of feeding it. The true pastors who are in the trenches with the people, providing spiritual
leadership, courage and hope, are expected to follow Trump’s demands to “stay home” and fend for themselves as best
they can—and leave their flock to do the same.
Today, commitment to God is
measured by how many Trump rallies we attend or how often we raise an Israeli flag.
I truly wonder what evangelicals
would have done had Barack Obama told them that no crowd over ten should congregate—in their churches or anywhere
else.
Maybe evangelicals will find their
backbone after a Democrat returns to the White House.
As it stands right now,
America—including Christian America—is suffering from a contagion of fear, which, as FDR said, is what we should
fear most.
P.S. My message from last Sunday
shares the same title as this column,A Contagion Of Fear.
In this message, I review the
history of the coronavirus. I point out who is profiting from the virus and show the loss of liberties and increase
of Police State tyranny that are being created by this medical scare.
And, most of all, I show the
teaching of God’s Word for Christians to never be consumed with the spirit of fear but to continue to stand for
what is right and trust God.
*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing
audience, donations may be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:
By Andrew P. Napolitano -
Wednesday, March 25, 2020
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither
Liberty nor Safety.”
— Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
One of my Fox colleagues recently sent me an email attachment of a painting of the framers signing
the Constitution of the United States. Except in this version, George Washington — who presided at the
Constitutional Convention — looks at James Madison — who was the scrivener at the Convention — and says, “None of
this counts if people get sick, right?”
In these days of state governors issuing daily decrees purporting to criminalize the exercise of
our personal freedoms, the words put into Washington’s mouth are only mildly amusing. Had Washington actually asked
such a question, Madison, of all people, would likely have responded: “No. This document protects our natural
rights at all times and under all circumstances.”
It is easy, 233 years later, to offer that hypothetical response, particularly since the Supreme
Court has done so already when, as readers of this column will recall, Abraham Lincoln suspended the
constitutionally guaranteed writ of habeas corpus — the right to be brought before a judge upon arrest — only to be
rebuked by the Supreme Court.
The famous line above by Benjamin Franklin, though uttered in a 1755 dispute between the
Pennsylvania legislature and the state’s governor over taxes, nevertheless provokes a truism.
Namely, that since our rights come from our humanity, not from the government, foolish people can
only sacrifice their own freedoms, not the freedoms of others.
Thus, freedom can only be taken away when the government proves fault at a jury trial. This
protection is called procedural due process, and it, too, is guaranteed in the Constitution.
Of what value is a constitutional guarantee if it can be violated when people get sick? If it can,
it is not a guarantee; it is a fraud. Stated differently, a constitutional guarantee is only as valuable and
reliable as is the fidelity to the Constitution of those in whose hands we have reposed it for safekeeping.
Because the folks in government, with very few exceptions, suffer from what St. Augustine called
libido dominandi — the lust to dominate — when they are confronted with the age-old clash of personal liberty
versus government force, they will nearly always come down on the side of force.
How do they get away with this? By scaring the daylights out of us. I never thought I’d see this in
my lifetime, though our ancestors saw this in every generation. In America today, we have a government of fear.
Machiavelli offered that men obey better when they fear you than when they love you. Sadly, he was right, and the
government in America knows this.
But Madison knew this as well when he wrote the Constitution. And he knew it four years later when
he wrote the Bill of Rights. He intentionally employed language to warn those who lust to dominate that, however
they employ governmental powers, the Constitution is “the Supreme Law of the Land” and all government behavior in
America is subject to it.
Even if the legislature of the State of New York ordered, as my friend Gov. Andrew Cuomo — who as
the governor, cannot write laws that incur criminal punishment — has ordered, it would be invalid as prohibited by
the Constitution.
This is not a novel or an arcane argument. This is fundamental American law. Yet, it is being
violated right before our eyes by the very human beings we have elected to uphold it. And each of them — every
governor interfering with the freedom to make one’s own choices — has taken an express oath to comply with the
Constitution.
You want to bring the family to visit grandma? You want to engage in a mutually beneficial, totally
voluntary commercial transaction? You want to go to work? You want to celebrate Mass? These are all now prohibited
in one-third of the United States.
I tried and failed to find Mass last Sunday. When did the Catholic Church become an agent of the
state? How about an outdoor Mass?
What is the nature of freedom? It is an unassailable natural claim against all others, including
the government. Stated differently, it is your unconditional right to think as you wish, to say what you think, to
publish what you say, to associate with whomever wishes to be with you no matter their number, to worship or not,
to defend yourself, to own and use property as you see fit, to travel where you wish, to purchase from a willing
seller, to be left alone. And to do all this without a government permission slip.
What is the nature of government? It is the negation of freedom. It is a monopoly of force in a
designated geographic area. When elected officials fear that their base is slipping, they will feel the need to do
something — anything — that will let them claim to be enhancing safety. Trampling liberty works for that odious
purpose. Hence a decree commanding obedience, promising safety and threatening punishment.
These decrees — issued by those who have no legal authority to issue them, enforced by cops who
hate what they are being made to do, destructive of the freedoms that our forbearers shed oceans of blood to
preserve and crushing economic prosperity by violating the laws of supply and demand — should all be rejected by an
outraged populace, and challenged in court.
These challenges are best filed in federal courts, where those who have trampled our liberties will
get no special quarter. I can tell you from my prior life as a judge that most state governors fear nothing more
than an intellectually honest, personally courageous, constitutionally faithful federal judge.
Fight fear with fear.
Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is a regular contributor
to The Washington Times. He is the author of nine books on the U.S. Constitution.